I had a long argument with my high-school biology teacher back in the early 80s about environmental effects on genes. She said it was impossible and almost lowered my grade for arguing about it. Good to know I was right!
when I taught there was no problem with my best students, they already had their degree in the first year, they only had to do the work like filling in a form. the students who I spent most of my time with, were equally as good. but they were quashed by their parents never being there.. not on open days, not in conversation.. sad kids. family is not the point,. love and security is what makes ppl feel worthy. think about yourself. you have love in you life.. you shine like a diamond.
I subscribe to science journals (the cheap ones) It is indisputable fact that genes which determine behaviour are activated in many cases by nurture. A good example is the 'plague' of ADHD, it need not exist if kids are not stressed or exposed to poisons, .it s statistical fact. This is not science but comes from my experience as a lecturer. Students who were brilliant had parents come to my open days. so sad and damaging for those who's parent's didn't. It was like pain which lasted for weeks.
this would imply that if one re-program oneself to act always in the best interest of all -to the point of self-perfection - that they would then pass this programming on to their offspring
@edthewave - Hm, yes and no. I think that they understood (or were taught) that spiritual laws are often the same as, and inter-connected to physical ones...
on a long term though I doubt that epigenetics have such an important role.. basically it's important on the short-term, the first generation after you..
How behavior can affect genes accordingly is beyond me. Sure, many activities can put genes at risk of being modified, but modifying them to reinforce that behavior? It sounds far too Lamarckian to be valid... Granted, I am not a geneticist nor a biologist, but I am not ignorant of the topic, either.
I see lots of people here jumping to all sorts of conclusions about this., let's not get carried away, eh folks? let's await sound scientific findings rather than assuming hanging by your feet produces tall children (OK i'm mocking a little).
55 comments 7 months ago...... 2 the following month...then 1, next month 1...then none ...none.... then 1.... mmmm.... where am I going with this..... not sure. However.. my thoughts on the actual theory..... BEHAVIOUR - is it a gene based.... or thought based ... If it's thought based.... wow we have a lot of control.... we can enlighten people and change the world!!
Then, the Environment you grew up in will, how you reacted to it will have an impact upon the following generations....Imagine then the impact upon Iraq and Afghan population 20, 40 years from now .
@067012732 however young one experience is seeing with ones own eyes and if you are limited in studies of history and idea to create a super race,then you have a lot to learn come back then.
I had a long argument with my high-school biology teacher back in the early 80s about environmental effects on genes. She said it was impossible and almost lowered my grade for arguing about it. Good to know I was right!
when I taught there was no problem with my best students, they already had their degree in the first year, they only had to do the work like filling in a form.
the students who I spent most of my time with, were equally as good. but they were quashed by their parents never being there.. not on open days, not in conversation.. sad kids.
family is not the point,. love and security is what makes ppl feel worthy.
think about yourself.
you have love in you life.. you shine like a diamond.
When will Dr. Bronner's epigenomic fortification tonic and aftershave lotion be available?
I subscribe to science journals (the cheap ones)
It is indisputable fact that genes which determine behaviour are activated in many cases by nurture.
A good example is the 'plague' of ADHD, it need not exist if kids are not stressed or exposed to poisons, .it s statistical fact.
This is not science but comes from my experience as a lecturer.
Students who were brilliant had parents come to my open days.
so sad and damaging for those who's parent's didn't.
It was like pain which lasted for weeks.
Check Cole et al;, 2005, Genome Biology - Social regulation of gene expression!
Decorator pattern for genes?
Does this make genetics object-oriented?
this dude is crackin me up...great vid
Duuhhhh!!! this is what our ancestors and elders were teaching us...it is absolutly imperative that we teach our children what tha ancestors taught us
this would imply that if one re-program oneself to act always in the best interest of all -to the point of self-perfection - that they would then pass this programming on to their offspring
i wud like to see the proof for this, please and thank you
@SopLusus you'd be surprised how many people don't know this yet. I think "epigenetics" will be a household word in less than 10 years.
@edthewave - Hm, yes and no.
I think that they understood (or were taught) that spiritual laws are often the same as, and inter-connected to physical ones...
Lamarck's last laugh.
@prosvjeta - What does this have to do with evolution? However, this is a concept that is mentioned in many faiths, including Christianity & Judaism.
on a long term though I doubt that epigenetics have such an important role..
basically it's important on the short-term, the first generation after you..
Wasn't it the other way around?
How behavior can affect genes accordingly is beyond me. Sure, many activities can put genes at risk of being modified, but modifying them to reinforce that behavior? It sounds far too Lamarckian to be valid...
Granted, I am not a geneticist nor a biologist, but I am not ignorant of the topic, either.
I see lots of people here jumping to all sorts of conclusions about this., let's not get carried away, eh folks? let's await sound scientific findings rather than assuming hanging by your feet produces tall children (OK i'm mocking a little).
@Sinekyre14 List some evidence to support your statement.
has this idea been tested yet?
@sabotoged Do you think the ancient prophets and sages were privy to this information?
my kids are going to have a great time..,,,,,
Doesn't sound crazy or strange at all. If environment and behavior were not effecting genes, then how could evolution be possible?
See Bruce Lipton's work.
55 comments 7 months ago...... 2 the following month...then 1, next month 1...then none ...none.... then 1.... mmmm.... where am I going with this..... not sure. However.. my thoughts on the actual theory..... BEHAVIOUR - is it a gene based.... or thought based ... If it's thought based.... wow we have a lot of control.... we can enlighten people and change the world!!
@TheBluePianist it does sound crazy to him
whoa
@CoffeyBreaks haha thats great
Then, the Environment you grew up in will, how you reacted to it will have an impact upon the following generations....Imagine then the impact upon Iraq and Afghan population 20, 40 years from now .
@killkill0
So you're saying epigenetics is pseudoscience?
I'm a neuroscience major, what he's saying about epigenetics is 100% true, lmao.
@killkill0 U mad bro?
Lamarck FTW!
@067012732 however young one experience is seeing with ones own eyes
and if you are limited in studies of history and idea to create a super race,then you have a lot to learn
come back then.
Lamarckism Is partially true!?
That's what the Bible's talking about !
HELLO!!! What do you thing the Bible is telling you!