Subhan Allah, ustadh has a way of rejuvenating our inherent inclination towards deen and hope and goodness! may ALLAH AZZA WAJAL preserve him bi'ithnillah 💫
I’ve been listening to nouman since year one of college in NYC. Never heard of him back then and I was ditching class to listen to his lectures in Barnes n noble. I learned nothing in class and took the Quran my salah an deen a bit more serious because of how simple and easy going with his humor made me listen to him for almost 10 years. There’s no one who explains and gives examples or engages the crowd and makes them laugh like nouman
Mashaa Allah! May Allah bless your family!! You have been helping me a lot since 2008 into understanding and growing into this deen. Listening to your lecture made my husband go to hadji made me wear hijab made me and my family put the deen first. Jakalahu khair!!!
QUR'ANIC ACCOUNT OF CREATION VS THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION CREATION OR EVOLUTION (1) The theory of evolution asserts that living things are not part of creation or intelligent design, but a coincidental causes and natural process. However, this " theory of Evolution by natural selection " gave rise to doubts from the very beginning. 1- What were the " natural and coincidental variations " referred to by Darwin ? How could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species ? 2- Darwin asserted that " living beings evolved gradually". In this çase, there should have lived millions of " transitional forms". Yet there was no trace of these theoretical creatures in fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought this problem, and eventually arrived at this conclusion that " further research would provide these fossils." 3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes , ears or wings? How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing. H.S.Lipson, a British physicist makes the following comments about these " difficulties " of Darwin's: " On reading ' The Origin of Species ' I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be ; the chapter entitled " Difficulties of the Theory" for example, shows considerable self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen. (1) However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties. The Problem of Origin of Life : The theory that non-living matter could come together to form living organism, had been widely accepted. Even in the period of Darwin's ' Origin of Species ' was written, the belief that bacteria could come into existence from inanimate matter was widespread. A corner stone of the Theory of Evolution was disapproved by Louis Pasture. In his lecture at the Sorbbone in 1864. He said: " Never will be the doctrine of spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow srtuck by this simple experiment." (2) However, as scientific progress revealed the complex structure of the cell, the idea that life could come into being coincidently faced an even greater impasse. The problem of Genetic : Another subject that posed a quandary for Darwin's theory was inheritance.Vague beliefs about inheritance led Darwin to base his theory on completely false ground.Darwin assumed that : Naturaĺ selection was the " mechanism of Evolution." He was unable to explain how would " useful traits" be selected and transmitte to the next geneation? At this point, he embraced the Lamarckan theory, that is " the inheritance of acquired traits". However, Lamarck's thesis was disapproved by the laws of genetic inheritance discovered by Gregor Mendel. The concept of "useful traits" was therefore left unsupported. Genetic laws showed that acquired traits are not passed on, since no alteration in their genetic data takes place, no transformation of species occurs. This was a serious deadend for Darwin's theory, which tried to base the concept of " useful traits " on Lamarck. Mendel opposed not only Lamarck's model of evolution,but also Darwin's. Mendel was in favour of the orthodox doctrine of special creation. (1) H.S. Lipson, " A Physicit's view of Darwin's theory", Evolutio Trends in Plants, vol.2, No, 1988, p.6 (2) Sidney Fox, Klause Dose, Molecular Evolution and The Origin of Life. W.H.Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1972, p.4. Continue : -- Dr. Mohammad Laeeque Nndvi nadvilaeeque@gmail.com
Subhan Allah, ustadh has a way of rejuvenating our inherent inclination towards deen and hope and goodness!
may ALLAH AZZA WAJAL preserve him bi'ithnillah 💫
I’ve been listening to nouman since year one of college in NYC. Never heard of him back then and I was ditching class to listen to his lectures in Barnes n noble. I learned nothing in class and took the Quran my salah an deen a bit more serious because of how simple and easy going with his humor made me listen to him for almost 10 years. There’s no one who explains and gives examples or engages the crowd and makes them laugh like nouman
Mashaa Allah! May Allah bless your family!! You have been helping me a lot since 2008 into understanding and growing into this deen. Listening to your lecture made my husband go to hadji made me wear hijab made me and my family put the deen first. Jakalahu khair!!!
Subhanallaah...
may Allah bless you and your family....may Allah increase your eaman
owlie alim Ameen!!
I will be waiting for your video.
Swear unrated video this should be millions of veiwers
إني أحبكم حب الوالد لولده للله وفي الله
Jazakillah
Jazakallah have
Subhanallah
سلام الله عليكم يا شيخي my teacher نومنا ءلي خن
Mash Allah
Lovvvve it
Why thus is not heard by all people
ALLAHU AKBER
wonderful
QUR'ANIC ACCOUNT OF CREATION
VS
THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION
CREATION OR EVOLUTION
(1)
The theory of evolution asserts that living things are not part of creation or intelligent design, but a coincidental causes and natural process.
However, this " theory of Evolution by natural selection " gave rise to doubts from the very beginning.
1- What were the " natural and coincidental variations " referred to by Darwin ?
How could these variations provide an explanation for the diversity in animal and plant species ?
2- Darwin asserted that " living beings evolved gradually". In this çase, there should have lived millions of " transitional forms". Yet there was no trace of these
theoretical creatures in fossil record. Darwin gave considerable thought this problem, and eventually arrived at this conclusion that
" further research would provide these fossils."
3- How could natural selection explain complex organs, such as eyes , ears or wings?
How can it be advocated that these organs evolved gradually, bearing in mind that they would fail to function if they had even a single part missing.
H.S.Lipson, a British physicist makes the following comments about these " difficulties " of Darwin's:
" On reading ' The Origin of Species ' I found that Darwin was much less sure himself than he is often represented to be ; the chapter entitled " Difficulties of the Theory" for example, shows considerable
self-doubt. As a physicist, I was particularly intrigued by his comments on how the eye would have arisen. (1)
However, contrary to his expectations, more recent scientific findings have merely increased these difficulties.
The Problem of Origin of Life :
The theory that non-living matter could come together to form living organism, had been widely accepted. Even in the period of Darwin's ' Origin of Species ' was written, the belief that bacteria could come into existence from inanimate matter was widespread.
A corner stone of the Theory of Evolution was disapproved by Louis Pasture. In his lecture at the Sorbbone in 1864. He said:
" Never will be the doctrine of spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow srtuck by this simple experiment." (2)
However, as scientific progress revealed the complex structure of the cell, the idea that life could come into being coincidently faced an even greater impasse.
The problem of Genetic :
Another subject that posed a quandary for Darwin's theory was inheritance.Vague beliefs about inheritance led Darwin to base his theory on completely false
ground.Darwin assumed that : Naturaĺ selection was the " mechanism of Evolution."
He was unable to explain how would
" useful traits" be selected and transmitte to the next geneation? At this point, he embraced the Lamarckan theory, that is
" the inheritance of acquired traits".
However, Lamarck's thesis was
disapproved by the laws of genetic
inheritance discovered by Gregor
Mendel. The concept of "useful traits" was therefore left unsupported.
Genetic laws showed that acquired traits are not passed on, since no alteration in their genetic data takes place, no transformation of species occurs. This was a serious deadend for Darwin's theory, which tried to base the concept of " useful traits " on Lamarck.
Mendel opposed not only Lamarck's
model of evolution,but also Darwin's. Mendel was in favour of the orthodox doctrine of special creation.
(1) H.S. Lipson, " A Physicit's view of
Darwin's theory", Evolutio Trends in
Plants, vol.2, No, 1988, p.6
(2) Sidney Fox, Klause Dose, Molecular Evolution and The Origin of Life.
W.H.Freeman and Company, San
Francisco, 1972, p.4.
Continue : --
Dr. Mohammad Laeeque Nndvi
nadvilaeeque@gmail.com