The Apache is like a stealthy tiger and the HIND is like a big intimidating lion. You see a lion in the wild and you freeze in fear as it runs towards you, knowing it will kill you. If you see the tiger, your dead already.
I assure you...the Mi-24 is much more feared than the AH-64 will ever be. It has seem more conflicts and not only killed, but transported more people than probably any other helicopter. Not only that, but it holds the world record still for its top speed.
Though these machines don't share the same designation, both are just insane! The Apache is a deadly dragonfly, while the Hind is a beast, just a beast!
Hind all the way never much of a fan of the Apache, numerous problems with the Apache and most likely the Hind also. But the the cooler looking and meaner sounding of all but the Mi-28 Havoc. Good choice.
The Apache looks more advanced, but the Hind looks outright intimidating and more powerful. They're both incredible aircraft and it's so hard to choose!
Supreme video! Thanks for posting! Sounds of Mi-24 are astonishing - engines, main rotor and roaring tail rotor. And you can see how much Mi-24 is heavier than AH-64.
Apache is an attack helicopter with 2 pilots. And the Mi-24 is an attack transport helicopter, 2 pilots+ 8 soldiers in the cargo compartment can carry.
You're right ! The sound of the Mi-24's propellers is more pleasant and melodious !! If the Mi-26 had retracted its landing gear, it would have looked more serious !
- Товарищ прапорщик, а крокодилы летают? - Нет, рядовой, не летают! - А вчера товарищ генерал сказал, что крокодилы летают! - Генерал сказал?! Ну если и летают, то совсем низенько - низенько! P.S. МИ-24 - "крокодил" ;-)
Luckily Indonesian Army were operating both Apache and Hind, although it's the export version of Hind (Mi-35P). Combination of the terrifying looks of Hind and the advanced technology of Apache, give them an advantage for ground troops to advancing their position. It's only that Indonesian Army still lack of ideal amount of both of these Apache and Hind, and also for heavy transport helicopter.
Not sure if these would ever go head to head...I feel that the alligator is more fitting in a versus scenario. Having said that, the HIND held its own quite impressively and I say that as an Apache fan.
Apache for agility and maneuverability and able to shoot blind from line of sight, exceptional radar, and hind for capacity and and dual role assault, attack.
Love these two helicopters for different reasons. But the hind was a ingenious idea, from the back end of the 60's. But could you imagine what is achieved on the battlefield, if both choppers worked together, frightening. Moving and protection of ground troops against armour Andy no need for any other support aircraft.
Вы хитрые ребята сравнили вертолёты разных классов а сравните свой Апач с КА-50 Чорнай Акула или с КА-52 тогда совсем по другому будет , у КА -50 диапазон работы пушки намного шире.
правильно сделали, что с Ми-24 всё оружие поснимали. Если бы "крокодил" перед посетителями шоу предстал в полном своём обвесе - все зрители гарантированно тогда бы обосрались (ну или описались, кто посмелее) ;-)
@@RAVI-vt4uq не, ну это ж шоу. зачем так сильно интуристов стращать? хотя вместо десантников можно было бы чеченский спецназ туда посадить.... или сказать что посадили - эффект будет тот же ))
Mi64 Hind D is faster than Apache. The Mujaheedin only able to shut it down with Stinger missiles in Afghanistan. .50cal and even Russian RPG cannot even put a scratch on it. Hughes Helicopter Division the original genius who created the Apache originally built the Apache a real flying tank that even a 20mm cannon will have a hard time stopping it, but the Pentagon discontinue using such armor for the Apache. Same reason why they discontinue the development of Sikorsky Comanche Stealthy Recon Attack Helucopter and favors a Bell Helicopter concept of lesser tech than the Comamche. Stupid US Govt.
@@1quickster distegarding that first production Apache was built in 1995... it didn't have it's famouse radar until 1997 (mainline was AH-64A which can shoot only in direct line of sight, not BVR). Regarding speed, apache is slower, so it can't escape fight if Mi-24 crew would insist, so it could only "involuntary engage". Also apache can't catch up with Mi-24 if it's crew would avoid engagement. Regarding comparable armor... apache also more fragile. So it's not so obviuos and not so "easy" as you brag aboug it.
@@raimrinat4730 вот так и может. И то что заложено, не значит, что это использовалось. От десанта в кабине отказались практически сразу. В Афгане даже подвески все никогда не вешали. Он и так перетяжелён.
Apache is almost two times lighter than Hind and naturally sharp maneuvers are easier for him. Mi-24 is heavier, control is also not easy and you need a great height for tricks. However, if the pilot is experienced and the management allowed a little risk, then he will do all the elements of aerobatics.
What air dynamics do you mean? That one which prevents apache from being fast? It's air dinamics of brick with enough powerful engine. Mi-24LL can fly 405 km/h. Production versions of Mi-24 fly at 310 km/h. That what is called air dynamics. Agility of Apache (at low speeds) has it's cost: it's lighter, less armored and more fragile.
Nope. Hind has better armor, more slots and carrying load for ordinance. Different roles, Apache is a recon attack helicopter designed for fire support and recon, Hind is an Assault Helicopter designed for the front line.
@@13thSystem Not true, The Apache is a front line helicopter designed for one an one engagements against such advisories such as the or now the MI-28 Havoc. It was originally a tank buster yes, but was designed to take on such threats as the Hind from the start. The Apache is much more maneuverability with the technology to back it. Better armor, the Hind is a machine that can survive small arms fire yes, but it's not armored like the Apache except on the sides of the cockpit with minimal armor.
@@mesocyclone9031 By front line I mean the actual front as in landing right at the face of the enemy to take troops in and out of battle while providing fire support. Hind's armor is thick steel rated to resist up to the smaller auto cannon calibers. Apache has thick Kevlar only rated for heavy machine guns. Apache is a recon attack helicopter, Hind is an assault helicopter, different roles.
@@ДмитрийЛюднов well technically yes, an apache can shoot down a plane easily if they wanted to by simply putting in air to air missiles instead of hellfire missiles, the superior radar on the apache would also make it more effective in such a role but US doctrine doesn't need air to air missiles on helicopters.
من میگوفتم هیلکوپتر امریکائی قوی برتر باشد اما حالا هیلوکوپتر روسی قویتر است وهیلوکوپتر روسی بسیار مقبول زیبا خشن و جنگنده عصبانی فقط برای بخاطر جنگ آمده باشد معلوم میشود
![TEEDEE TADA - DIAMOND NARAKORN X LEGO LYKN [Special Dance Performance]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QgtZedFeumA/mqdefault.jpg)
The two biggest rivals in helicopter gunships flying together. Both are truly masterful creations in the world of rotorcraft.
Hind have a great characteristic,it can drops troops,bring loads and it's an attack helicopter. That is just beautiful.
An assault chopper and attack chooper in the same time.
This is like a Lion and a Tiger playing together in the wild..
The Apache is like a stealthy tiger and the HIND is like a big intimidating lion. You see a lion in the wild and you freeze in fear as it runs towards you, knowing it will kill you. If you see the tiger, your dead already.
@@gigachad250 both helicopters are noisy HIND produces louder noise than the apache.MI 28 is truly stealth hunter
That's something one never sees together side by side. Cool!
These are different categories of helicopters! AH-64D must compete with MI-28N!
I assure you...the Mi-24 is much more feared than the AH-64 will ever be. It has seem more conflicts and not only killed, but transported more people than probably any other helicopter.
Not only that, but it holds the world record still for its top speed.
@@AmishHitman73.Archive Now imagine such a public display of the AH-64D and MI-28N!
also with Ka-50N
@@Simbirsk2130 The Ka-50 has no analogues))
@@СергейСонин-д1б that is correct!
th-cam.com/video/5EnasEI5gcs/w-d-xo.html
The only video in the whole net in which we get to see these beautiful machines flying together...something I've waited for years to see!
Perfect team. Tank Mi 24 with its ordnance capacity and armour, Rogue Apache with better sensor and long range precision.
Mi-24 sounds like aThunderstorm. AH-64 more like a PC fan.
Ты прав ! Звук винтов у Ми-24 приятнее и мелодичней !! (You're right ! The sound of the Mi-24's propellers is more pleasant and melodious !!)
Lol dual core Russian pc maybe
probably a good thing, you dont want your enemies to hear you coming
Крокодил потрясающе красив
лётающая бмп
Причём красота, от которой кровь стынет в жилах
Корова
@роман николаев их всех сбивают из пзрк_рогатка_ бронь им что попизде ладоха
Автобус с автоматчиками.
Though these machines don't share the same designation, both are just insane! The Apache is a deadly dragonfly, while the Hind is a beast, just a beast!
Mi 24 best of best
так и есть только теперь это ми 35
I'm a American. i like them both..but from the two I'd pick the hind...amazing and intimidating gunship.
Yes,the Apache is also nice but the Hind is great and nice!
Hind all the way never much of a fan of the Apache, numerous problems with the Apache and most likely the Hind also. But the the cooler looking and meaner sounding of all but the Mi-28 Havoc. Good choice.
The Apache looks more advanced, but the Hind looks outright intimidating and more powerful.
They're both incredible aircraft and it's so hard to choose!
ship with guns ......in the air :D
The hind is legendary and still relevant.
Ми-24 👍
Supreme video! Thanks for posting!
Sounds of Mi-24 are astonishing - engines, main rotor and roaring tail rotor.
And you can see how much Mi-24 is heavier than AH-64.
Different classes of Heli... Apache's analogue is mi-28
Mi-24 still doesn't have any analogue at NATO Heli....
Apache is an attack helicopter with 2 pilots. And the Mi-24 is an attack transport helicopter, 2 pilots+ 8 soldiers in the cargo compartment can carry.
That's amazing!
Ok that was cool. I'd like to have seen them flying more together, but that was sweet.
Love the sound of the rotors punishing the air.
The new mi-24 in Russ is mi-35
doesn't the "Mi-35" term was use only for Exports version?.
@@Daiman01 no, its new version for russian army..
You're right ! The sound of the Mi-24's propellers is more pleasant and melodious !! If the Mi-26 had retracted its landing gear, it would have looked more serious !
My goodness that Russian chopper looks mean it reminds me of Rambo 1
Yes a Hind 24 is seen in the third Rambo movie. It's the one were he rescued his Colonel buddy in Russia.
There was never a Russian chopper in Rambo I (First Blood). It’s in Rambo II and Rambo III
The momma heli goes on a stroll with her youngling.
mi24 air bmp. ah64 antitank helicopter
- Товарищ прапорщик, а крокодилы летают?
- Нет, рядовой, не летают!
- А вчера товарищ генерал сказал, что крокодилы летают!
- Генерал сказал?! Ну если и летают, то совсем низенько - низенько!
P.S. МИ-24 - "крокодил" ;-)
Думаешь тут есть такие, кто не знает?
@@SuperSuperka , канал англоязычный. МИ-24 по классификации НАТО "Hind" - "Лань" (читай в названии ролика).
Ми 24 лучший
Excellent film footage and sound.
What we really need is some excellent sound guys to identify the Heli by sound. I love to bass out to Rotor even more than Rap music!
Вертолеты для разных боевых задач
Хоть сракай тряси.... Мишка выдержит все. И лич. Сотав доставит. Эта машина для боя. Что и доказала.
AH 64 😍😍😍😍
Mi24 any day !
It was awesome to see the U.S. AH-64 Apache Longbow flying with the Russian Mil Mi-24 Hind together in peace👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼!!!
Luckily Indonesian Army were operating both Apache and Hind, although it's the export version of Hind (Mi-35P).
Combination of the terrifying looks of Hind and the advanced technology of Apache, give them an advantage for ground troops to advancing their position. It's only that Indonesian Army still lack of ideal amount of both of these Apache and Hind, and also for heavy transport helicopter.
Lol at the CPG on the Apache doing his part for the airshow too
Que máquinas!!! Ojalá mi país tuviera los dos aparatos.
Sería excelente la comparación entre un Apache y un Kamov or Mi 28
They were supposed to fight each other.... but gladly they didn't.
@fassenkugel.. Yeah, i know... but i ment more like opposing countries 😁
AS MANOBRAS DO AH-64 APACHE SÃO INSUPERÁVEIS... ELE É O MELHOR E SEMPRE SERÁ...
Херня ваш "Апач", ты ещё КА-52 не видел !
Not sure if these would ever go head to head...I feel that the alligator is more fitting in a versus scenario. Having said that, the HIND held its own quite impressively and I say that as an Apache fan.
This is like seeing Sasquatch ride a unicorn. Just a sight to see on their own but together make a view.
МИ 24 Мощь!!!!
Q lindo ver a estos dos Titanes juntos
Apache for agility and maneuverability and able to shoot blind from line of sight, exceptional radar, and hind for capacity and and dual role assault, attack.
Крокодил и в Африке крокодил красив и страшен как хищник
Hind - E 👍👍❤love and respect from India🇮🇳 🙏
Love these two helicopters for different reasons. But the hind was a ingenious idea, from the back end of the 60's. But could you imagine what is achieved on the battlefield, if both choppers worked together, frightening. Moving and protection of ground troops against armour Andy no need for any other support aircraft.
Super hind tune, look like a beautifull
Nice! Sound at its best! Dziekuje c Lipsk! ;o)
apache is beautiful
The virgin Ah64 vs the Chad MI24 hind
true
Take a look from @9:10 - I'm looking at both the pilot and WSO seats and I can't see anyone in there - time to start worrying maybe???!!!
Вы хитрые ребята сравнили вертолёты разных классов а сравните свой Апач с КА-50 Чорнай Акула или с КА-52 тогда совсем по другому будет , у КА -50 диапазон работы пушки намного шире.
Jeśli chodzi o kultowe śmigłowce bojowe to chyba nie można było sparować bardziej ikonicznych maszyn.Zabrakłoby jeszcze tylko Bell 209 Cobra.
правильно сделали, что с Ми-24 всё оружие поснимали. Если бы "крокодил" перед посетителями шоу предстал в полном своём обвесе - все зрители гарантированно тогда бы обосрались (ну или описались, кто посмелее) ;-)
А русский сказал бы - маловато будет надо было и десантников в него загрузить)
@@RAVI-vt4uq не, ну это ж шоу. зачем так сильно интуристов стращать? хотя вместо десантников можно было бы чеченский спецназ туда посадить.... или сказать что посадили - эффект будет тот же ))
@@vladislavverbitskiy8319 "чеченский спецназ"! Этим все сказано.
@@vladislavverbitskiy8319 ой,дурак...и зачем тебя только из больницы выпустили?
Very cool flying! 🔥 Hello from Russia
Ми24 потрясающе красивый вертолет наш мощнее и красивее
У нас все красивее и мощнее! Даже бумага наша белее, и железо наше ТЯЖЕЛЕЕ! А если серьезното пропасть огромная.
Aww the huey didn't get to play with the big boys
Good show i
if it's called dogfight for fixed wing aircrafts then what's the term for two helicopters in combat?
Cat fight
Nice
Flying fighting the fall!
AH-64D Apache é o MELHOR helicóptero de ataque do MUNDO...
I wan't the Hind because I feel its the only one I can afford on my £25,000 a year job and rental apartment . . .
HIND 👍👍👍
Задачи разные были у них, хорошо обои, ток ка50 не хватает...
The 2 sounds a Jihadi does NOT want to hear
Mi 28N, K52, jo jo jo.
Which of these would you prefer to have in your army? (Can only chose one.)
Russian lol
Apache. 😍belleza de helicóptero , apache all the way
MI-24
Mi-24 Hind of course. Mean Supreme Troop carrying capable Killin Machine.
Agility Vs Speed.
Mi64 Hind D is faster than Apache. The Mujaheedin only able to shut it down with Stinger missiles in Afghanistan. .50cal and even Russian RPG cannot even put a scratch on it. Hughes Helicopter Division the original genius who created the Apache originally built the Apache a real flying tank that even a 20mm cannon will have a hard time stopping it, but the Pentagon discontinue using such armor for the Apache. Same reason why they discontinue the development of Sikorsky Comanche Stealthy Recon Attack Helucopter and favors a Bell Helicopter concept of lesser tech than the Comamche. Stupid US Govt.
Abache 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
Pathetic , the Arabs don't have a 'P' in Arab vocabulary , so they pronounce Abache instead of Apache
@daAnder71 The Arabs don't pronounce 'p' even if there is Latin letter p
Imagine the Mi-24 with moving nose gun, armaments and electro optical systems of the Apache AH-64. 😜
It's called the Mi-24 Superhind and Mi-35
Апач и Ми-24 - это "танкетка" и БМП.
Танкетка и БМП? Бронеавтомобиль и танк!
Ми-24 это автобус с автоматчиками.
Wow that Russian chopper is like coming from space .deadly
Wow you do not see that everyday
THE SOVIET IS BETTER
Always Braulio that thing looks amazing
I was in the Army in 1983-86. The apache can easily take that Russian tank anytime.
@@1quickster distegarding that first production Apache was built in 1995... it didn't have it's famouse radar until 1997 (mainline was AH-64A which can shoot only in direct line of sight, not BVR). Regarding speed, apache is slower, so it can't escape fight if Mi-24 crew would insist, so it could only "involuntary engage". Also apache can't catch up with Mi-24 if it's crew would avoid engagement. Regarding comparable armor... apache also more fragile. So it's not so obviuos and not so "easy" as you brag aboug it.
Dream team:
AH64 Apache attack gunship
Mi24/35 troop carrier gunship.
крокодил ветеран Афганистана медаль на груди
как можно сравнивать эти два разных вертолёта. у ми - 24нет аналогов. Апач нужно сравнивать с Ми28
У 24 аналог кобра.
@@pivko1750 как он может быть его аналогом, кобра может взять десант на свой борт?
@@raimrinat4730 вот так и может. И то что заложено, не значит, что это использовалось. От десанта в кабине отказались практически сразу. В Афгане даже подвески все никогда не вешали. Он и так перетяжелён.
но тут как раз от заложеного и спорится
А вот интересно крокодилы ели индейцев ???
Jesus Christ that hind can move fast. Will leave other choppers beHind.
Apache fly wild better than Mi-24 because lower weight and aero dynamic.
Yeah, but try to hang howitzer underneath Apache, pick up 12 men with equipment and carry all that 200km :D :D :D
Apache is almost two times lighter than Hind and naturally sharp maneuvers are easier for him. Mi-24 is heavier, control is also not easy and you need a great height for tricks. However, if the pilot is experienced and the management allowed a little risk, then he will do all the elements of aerobatics.
@daAnder71 while being too heavy to be agile it doesnt stop it from being fast.
What air dynamics do you mean? That one which prevents apache from being fast? It's air dinamics of brick with enough powerful engine. Mi-24LL can fly 405 km/h. Production versions of Mi-24 fly at 310 km/h. That what is called air dynamics. Agility of Apache (at low speeds) has it's cost: it's lighter, less armored and more fragile.
Mi.24 sandinista
Apache fought so many big wars and they win... When the hind fought they lose...a lot...
The hind is an assault helicopter, the apache fought against guys armes with rpgs and old ak-47's
Both of them were lost in Afghanistan
👍mi 24
Hunter or savage?
Helikopter helikopter
СТРИКОЗА И КРОКОДИЛ...
Seems like czech pilot not skilled enough to show all the capabilities and pilotage of the Mi-24V Hind-E.
Mi 24
เย็ดแม่มึงยังห่างไกลจากมะกันอีกเยอะวะกว่าจะลงจอดใด้แม่งบินวนหาแม่งมึงสิกัวควยเปล่าๆแม่เย็ด
The hind is good but it wouldn't last a second against the Apache in a 1v1.
Nope. Hind has better armor, more slots and carrying load for ordinance. Different roles, Apache is a recon attack helicopter designed for fire support and recon, Hind is an Assault Helicopter designed for the front line.
@@13thSystem Not true, The Apache is a front line helicopter designed for one an one engagements against such advisories such as the or now the MI-28 Havoc. It was originally a tank buster yes, but was designed to take on such threats as the Hind from the start. The Apache is much more maneuverability with the technology to back it. Better armor, the Hind is a machine that can survive small arms fire yes, but it's not armored like the Apache except on the sides of the cockpit with minimal armor.
@@mesocyclone9031 By front line I mean the actual front as in landing right at the face of the enemy to take troops in and out of battle while providing fire support. Hind's armor is thick steel rated to resist up to the smaller auto cannon calibers. Apache has thick Kevlar only rated for heavy machine guns.
Apache is a recon attack helicopter, Hind is an assault helicopter, different roles.
@@13thSystem did apache shut down air plane? But mi 24 did
@@ДмитрийЛюднов well technically yes, an apache can shoot down a plane easily if they wanted to by simply putting in air to air missiles instead of hellfire missiles, the superior radar on the apache would also make it more effective in such a role but US doctrine doesn't need air to air missiles on helicopters.
крокодил
من میگوفتم هیلکوپتر امریکائی قوی برتر باشد اما حالا هیلوکوپتر روسی قویتر است وهیلوکوپتر روسی بسیار مقبول زیبا خشن و جنگنده عصبانی فقط برای بخاطر جنگ آمده باشد معلوم میشود
Al perecer en un combate entre estos dos Helicopteros ganaria el Apache de USA. Pues tiene mas maniobravilidad ...el MIL.24.Ruso es muy lento..
😂😂😂😂
El Mi 24 no es de la misma categoría pues también es de carga, el competidor del Apache es el Mi 28.
@@alemart7514 puede ser...
Vs mi28💪💪💪💪
Like gta v siky
Of those choppers was a woman I kiss eem💋💯
Апач чуть чуть моневренныйраак экен
Так он легче и менее бронированный )
Апач петлю может сделать )
они для разных целей
24 то толком и не летала.
@@Bee87ify только косую :)
Aum mane padme hum I
Mil veces mejor los helicópteros rusos.