Excellent presentation. Unfortunately a bit too quick to discount focal therapy. Would also have liked to see some correlations between this research and dietary and lifestyle, obesity etc, which I doubt exists. (I am a ten-year survivor of Gleason 9 PCa, and have recently received TULSA-PRO therapy.)
off topic but I don't understand that on one side they say.. Gleeson 6 will never metastasize then on the other 50% of patients with Gleeson 6 go on to have treatment within 10 years.. Can gleeson 6 change to Gleeson 7.. Anyone. Please help.
Perhaps in SOME cases there is a suspicion the biopsy core samples (resulting in a Gleason 6 finding) may not be telling the whole story. (FWIW, in SOME cases those suspicions are confirmed in pathology following surgery.).
My experience with "active surveillance " was to be totally ignored for years. There was no "active " present. 🤔
Excellent presentation. Unfortunately a bit too quick to discount focal therapy. Would also have liked to see some correlations between this research and dietary and lifestyle, obesity etc, which I doubt exists. (I am a ten-year survivor of Gleason 9 PCa, and have recently received TULSA-PRO therapy.)
off topic but I don't understand that on one side they say.. Gleeson 6 will never metastasize then on the other 50% of patients with Gleeson 6 go on to have treatment within 10 years.. Can gleeson 6 change to Gleeson 7.. Anyone. Please help.
Perhaps in SOME cases there is a suspicion the biopsy core samples (resulting in a Gleason 6 finding) may not be telling the whole story.
(FWIW, in SOME cases those suspicions are confirmed in pathology following surgery.).