I found that little graph of response rates in the two different trial phases to be most illuminating. It seems the picture is usually rosiest when you haven't looked too hard. I'm not an oncology professional, but I still found this video informative regarding the R&D of designer drug development. Thanks for recommending the book, "Malignant." I'm going to look it up.
In ONC for almost 9 years, thought it would be my life's work but this sort of totally useless "study" is one of the reasons I am looking to get out of it. Sound and fury...signifying nothing.
Doc is it just a coincidence or are you noticing more Lymphomas after 'the recent medical world experiment?' I know three people, two men and a woman in my town that have been diagnosed with Lymphoma afterwards and they are doing it tough as it seems quicker than normal in most according to their stories.
@@Ralph_Baric_PhD_C2019 Gottcha yep exactly! Well said, although I do believe there is some truth that people missed cancer being diagnosed because of lockdowns and closures as well but man the increase in heart attacks, strokes and rampant cancers is due to something we know but can't say on YT. And all the people that Died Suddenly...seen that on Rumble yet Jack?
@@ShadowMan66 Yeah, a friend of my sis, regular blood donor, 30 yo, was able to give blood pretty much the whole pandemic, classed as essential service, notified her in 3rd quarter 2022 about 9 months post jab that she better go to the emergency room, dangerously low white blood cells. So in this case its not a "late diagnosed" its a new diagnosis. Same with my dad, except its the big P, but we do have a family history and he's been regular 2 year PSA, again post jab, but that means nothing, right ?
Do you also think the world is flat? Just curious, I know a few people who think everything that is bad happening goes back to the vaccine, also believes the world is flat. What's scary to me is how many paranoid people we have on both ends of the spectrum. You've got the people still wanting to mask, and you've got people who think every pimple on their butt must be from the vaccine. I mean no kidding "Operation push it out as fast as you can" was a terrible idea, duh. Tis why you don't want ex-game show hosts turned terrible politicians, making science decisions. But believe it or not conspiracy theorists, people are going to come down with cancer just like they always did. Americans eat eat eat crap, smoke, drink to their livers explode, but oh man it's gotta be that vaccine! Sad, we need more mental health help in this country.
60 patients over 3 years doesn't seem like a great population study. "Not as bad as" and 'stable disease" is not very scientific. The words, "Smart Start" are insulting. I wonder about the connection between the distributor of the chemo agents and this study... Thank-you for exposing more on the medical industrial complex.
Dr Prasad is wonderful ... Dr Aseem Malhotra is on yt as well and challenging the current system..... The system that fakes it til it makes it. Pulls it if it doesn't. So many have been pulled that were once deemed "safe and effective".
Just hope I don’t get I’ll! Mind you it seems easy to be offed now legally and with little consequence for the ones who are prepared to kill ! How things change, Harold Shipman was just too early with his method?
@@ms-jl6dl There are also hundreds of people who also cured their cancer trying this garbage. Gotta use all tools available if someone is going to die anyway. To each their own good luck
*Dr Prasad can you discuss that the CDC estimates more than 57 percent of U.S. Covid infections are now due to the ‘BQ’ subvariants: BQ.1 and BQ.1.1. Combined, those subvariants knocked BA5 from dominance.*
Cochrane Library’s strong acknowledgement of the value of observational control studies: Cochrane Systematic Review from data of 1583 meta-analyses that covered 228 different medical conditions.: “Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials” The Cochrane Library determined: “Our results provide little evidence for significant effect estimate differences between observational studies and RCTs, regardless of specific observational study design, heterogeneity, inclusion of pharmacological studies, or use of propensity score adjustment”.
![Lecture on Cancer [ Coffee/ cancer; EV Pembro; Censoring] to UCSF Fresno](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E936vM2KJNY/mqdefault.jpg)
I found that little graph of response rates in the two different trial phases to be most illuminating. It seems the picture is usually rosiest when you haven't looked too hard.
I'm not an oncology professional, but I still found this video informative regarding the R&D of designer drug development. Thanks for recommending the book, "Malignant." I'm going to look it up.
Thank you Vinay
In ONC for almost 9 years, thought it would be my life's work but this sort of totally useless "study" is one of the reasons I am looking to get out of it. Sound and fury...signifying nothing.
Thank you, Vinay!!!
Doc is it just a coincidence or are you noticing more Lymphomas after 'the recent medical world experiment?'
I know three people, two men and a woman in my town that have been diagnosed with Lymphoma afterwards and they are doing it tough as it seems quicker than normal in most according to their stories.
yes
but that is just a catch up from low diagnoses during 2020-22 because peeps didnt want to go to the doctor...
Sarcasm
@@Ralph_Baric_PhD_C2019 Gottcha yep exactly! Well said, although I do believe there is some truth that people missed cancer being diagnosed because of lockdowns and closures as well but man the increase in heart attacks, strokes and rampant cancers is due to something we know but can't say on YT. And all the people that Died Suddenly...seen that on Rumble yet Jack?
Dr Ryan Cole
@@ShadowMan66 Yeah, a friend of my sis, regular blood donor, 30 yo, was able to give blood pretty much the whole pandemic, classed as essential service, notified her in 3rd quarter 2022 about 9 months post jab that she better go to the emergency room, dangerously low white blood cells.
So in this case its not a "late diagnosed" its a new diagnosis.
Same with my dad, except its the big P, but we do have a family history and he's been regular 2 year PSA, again post jab, but that means nothing, right ?
Do you also think the world is flat? Just curious, I know a few people who think everything that is bad happening goes back to the vaccine, also believes the world is flat. What's scary to me is how many paranoid people we have on both ends of the spectrum. You've got the people still wanting to mask, and you've got people who think every pimple on their butt must be from the vaccine. I mean no kidding "Operation push it out as fast as you can" was a terrible idea, duh. Tis why you don't want ex-game show hosts turned terrible politicians, making science decisions. But believe it or not conspiracy theorists, people are going to come down with cancer just like they always did. Americans eat eat eat crap, smoke, drink to their livers explode, but oh man it's gotta be that vaccine! Sad, we need more mental health help in this country.
Please upload to Rumble! I can listen to you with my phone locked and without ads!
*failed to demonstrate superiority is not the same as equivalence;* nice. _JC
60 patients over 3 years doesn't seem like a great population study. "Not as bad as" and 'stable disease" is not very scientific. The words, "Smart Start" are insulting. I wonder about the connection between the distributor of the chemo agents and this study...
Thank-you for exposing more on the medical industrial complex.
Dr Prasad is wonderful ...
Dr Aseem Malhotra is on yt as well and challenging the current system.....
The system that fakes it til it makes it. Pulls it if it doesn't.
So many have been pulled that were once deemed "safe and effective".
Just hope I don’t get I’ll! Mind you it seems easy to be offed now legally and with little consequence for the ones who are prepared to kill !
How things change, Harold Shipman was just too early with his method?
How is it legal to use indirect language for "death" in these publishings? How is any of this toxic "science" legal?
It’s all sophistry aka wordplay, to get around legal consequences. The devil is in the details, as they say.
Prolong fasting and high dose Vita C IV infusions
There are hunderds of dead cancer patients trying that garbage.
@@ms-jl6dl There are also hundreds of people who also cured their cancer trying this garbage. Gotta use all tools available if someone is going to die anyway. To each their own good luck
*Dr Prasad can you discuss that the CDC estimates more than 57 percent of U.S. Covid infections are now due to the ‘BQ’ subvariants: BQ.1 and BQ.1.1. Combined, those subvariants knocked BA5 from dominance.*
*23:40** Kleenex is a brand, & sponsored content has to be marked.* unless you mean _hope they have thr _*_tissues_*_ ready._ _JC
♿️
Cochrane Library’s strong acknowledgement of the value of observational control studies: Cochrane Systematic Review from data of 1583 meta-analyses that covered 228 different medical conditions.: “Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials” The Cochrane Library determined: “Our results provide little evidence for significant effect estimate differences between observational studies and RCTs, regardless of specific observational study design, heterogeneity, inclusion of pharmacological studies, or use of propensity score adjustment”.