Game constantly crashes when saving, so even though I love the game, it is now a dumpster fire for me. Started crashing after the latest patch. Devs don't give a shit.
@@GoalOrientedLiftingI would be shocked if Starfield hasn't been completely abandoned by the devs before it hits 3 years. CP has a pretty good story and a lot of interesting things worth exploring, Starfield is just copy and paste garbage. I got all the achievements and reached NG+12 and level 190, but other than the kind of okayish armor it wasn't very fun after +2.
There is something about this game where, I don't even have to be playing it, just seeing it played instantly bores me. I don't think I've ever felt that way about another game in my life. I commend you for trudging through this game. I'll drop a like just for that.
I would be really happy if they added a database for the scanner. You scan stuff, your database updates, you can access it from a terminal on your ship or something. Lets you see what materials can be harvested where. As it sits, your scanner does nothing in-game outside of giving you experience points.
@persona_yt and your dreams are just dreams and you lie on the internet lmao 🤣 just cuz I play video games don't mean my dreams ain't a reality. Where I live.
i’ve been playing on series x got a save going on 24 hours now and i’ve seen no bugs and it’s been great gameplay. i chose not to play for a long time because of vids like these and people hating but it’s been absolutely wonderful. give it a try yourself and don’t play if you’re impatient it’s not meant for you
I've been playing is since it released and I've never gotten why their is so much hate about this game. I can understand if it's just your cup of tea, but I have hundreds of hours on it and I still enjoy it. I know there's many other people like you who have seen all of the hate videos and therefore haven't tried it for themselves but they would probably enjoy it if they did.
I honestly think it has just become a "cool trend" to hate on this game because of expectations and Bethesda. The main criticisms, load screens/landing cuts/bugs never once bothered me, and I played on launch. Saw maybe 4 visual bugs that's it. The stories were very interesting because I had zero spoilers. Very nicely done, a lot of mystery. The textures are the best on the market, beating Cyberpunk. Both are graphically top shelf, Starfield honestly a bit more realistic and fresh. After playing both games for 100-150 hours, I enjoyed them equally. Even though Starfield is more of a looter, Cyberpunk feels more messy. There's a million random attributes that have almost no impact, and the looting is quite random. You display separate clothes than you equip. In Starfield, you get to know all of the manufacturers closely, for weapons and ships, it's a better RPG in the systems-sense. For Cyberpunk, the action during missions is movie like, and more immersive. Crazy shit happening all the time that really pulls you along, whilst Starfield keeps you in the athmosphere without many cut-scenes, simple and quite realistic.
You use realistic as a quality like it means anything other than "This game is so dull that the hum drum of real life is vastly more entertaining than it." As well, you have a serious chip on your shoulder about Cyberpunk. I dislike the cyberpunk genre as a rule, but you cannot tell me in any capacity that Starfield is better than it because "its more realistic" as the only thing you can say about it. This review is comical, let alone the accusation that people dislike this half baked trash because it's popular to.
@ballisticwaffles last I checked realistic graphics was the main selling point of most consoles and games since the launch of the ps3 and XBox360. Though I agree graphics mean nothing if the game play is bad.
7:17 the main story doesnt require you to do the 24 temples, only the first one is mandatory. If you skip the main quest on NG+, you get a much shorter quest and 0 temple is mandatory.
When this update came out I bought the RAV right away, then I turned off my console. I'm not even joking, I didn't even drive it. Just the thought of playing it was enough for me.
I personally love starfield with my 144 hours into it and on my third playthrough with the custom difficulty and I plan to beat it just before the dlc and then playing that immediately
@@jasperfox6821 that's not something to be proud of. If the studio that made Starfield is gonna make ES6 and we just let them take shortcuts I don't think it's going to be fun based off what was presented to us in starfield and saying its okay basically is giving up on the next elder scrolls game
Game constantly crashes when saving, so even though I love the game, it is now a dumpster fire for me. Started crashing after the latest patch. Devs don't give a shit.
It's exactly the same as before. Small bug fixes and some quality of life changes, but the Outpost's (major feature) are broken. Also I think your low subscriber count may be due to the fact that you use so much "British" in your videos and the subscriber base is mostly USA. I don't know what your main target audience is, but half the words you use, I don't know what it means.
@@L321 mods have ironed out 50% of the issues already. Which is A LOT faster than i expected. Now essentially we need to wait for some DLCs(all Bethesda games have been fleshed out and fixed by DLCs, even new Vegas) and the larger mods to drop
@@GoalOrientedLiftingthe base game should be “fun” from the start the difference between starfield and othe bgs games is that the core game loop is just boring. All of the poi are just randomly generated same stuff on every planet. Morrowind, oblivion, skyrim, fallout 3, and even fallout 4 had curated locations that made the setting feel alive and interesting. In starfield you have to go through multiple loading screens before you even get to explore and by the time you do, you realize it’s all just procedurally generated and has no point. Hey if you like the game I am happy for you but almost all bgs games are good without dlc… the main game is supposed to get me excited for upcoming dlc, not hope for it to complete an unfinished game lol
The fact that the buggy was not at launch is wild. I played the game, enjoyed the story, My only complaint is the repetitive dungeons and empty planets.
Just sub, i apperiate your raw straight foward opinion, keep reviewing older games as now in days most games arent really completed for like 1 to 2 years after release
@@skyriminspaceI think shattered space will be very good and give us a lot of stuff. And in turn the modders will have more stuff to. I'll always support modders.
The difference between Cyberpunk and Starfield is that Cyberpunk was good right after release. Yea, we had some whining people, but they were lied that CP works on older consoles/computers, which it didn't, but as time progressed those people just upgraded their machines and boom - "Cyberpunk great now" Starfield is just not good and they have to make a new game in order to fix it...
Are you dumb? Don't start making up lies and b.s. man. Cyberpunk was a buggy and unplayable mess when it first launched. It wasn't until maybe a year ago that it was much MUCH better. And that happened 4 years AFTER it's release! Look I think starfield is bad too, and just like you I like Cyberpunk lore. But the video game was trash until they put more time, updates and love into the game. Don't lie about that
@AltsekBUL dude don't do that there is no reason to lie. Cyberpunk is good "now" it was never like that before. It's release was messy and it was unplayable until I'd say 2 or 3 years ago. So yeah those "whiners" were right for a long time. I like Cyberpunk too, but don't at like it was always great.
Started in Nov '23.Stopped in Jan '24 bored with it. Went back 2 to 3 weeks ago and started from the beginning with a few Creation mods running. A much better experience all round- it looks and plays miles better, some of the side missions are very good. Pity it wasn't like this from the off.
Interesting. I played the same time frame, I put quite a few hours in and then realized the game kinda sucks and stopped. Maybe it’s time to try it again.
Not saying Starfield is good, it's just ok, but ok I think is still better than what Elder Scrolls Online and Fallout 76 was at launch. So... progress? Lol XD
Here enjoying the game after finishing my 35th play through of fallout new Vegas and I can say after getting used to the game 20 hours in I’m enjoying it a lot and have had no shortage of things to do. I’ve also had zero bugs so far.
I would press the button that just erases emil from the timeline ... I guarantee the moment it happen, Skyrim would magically split into about 3 or 4 genuinely good Elder Scrolls spinoffs, each one focused on a particular race and particular location. My favourite would have been Allthall , Contienent of Champions basically the island is a huge fucking Gladiator battle arena filled with "throw aways", or maybe Just orcs , or maybe just like rule breakers anyways it would tie into the High Elfs story where they fix up crystal balls to allow essentially "Pay Per View" , and people from all over the skyrim planet join and watch.
Part of Allthall would be you breaking out of Gladiator battle either by conquest, or cunning only to be met with High elves who specialize in both of those things , wacky interactions abound
I haven't played this game since it dropped. I'm waiting for this game to do a total of 360 like NMS. Just how NMS made me jump back on it with the World's Part 1 update.
land vehicleS? All I see is one buggy buggy, and I`d rather play astroneer than waste my time with that. Also praising the game for being better than when it released is ridiculous and pointless, because it could barely be called a game at that point. Yes, I`m pissed, but I`m also right.
This has made exploration alot better cus its certainly more fun exploring with a car than it is hopping around like a idiot but i still don't find the game fun since its mainly just sitting in loading screens and i dont find much of the quests / world interesting. like it really just makes me want to go and play no mans sky / fallout 4 again whenever i try to play it. ill admit its getting better but i dont think they are gonna be able to fix the game to the point ill actuly want to play it for longer than a few hours. Like i just cant see them fixing the loading screen bombardment the game is littered with and they cant fix how bad the main quest is. I just dont understand how no mans sky can do seamless plant to plant travle in 2014 yet this game released only a year ago needs to load just to enter the ship then take off then travel to the space around a planet then to land on the planet and then to exit the ship. to go from 1 planet to another is almost 5 load screens and even on my super fast ssd it still takes longer than i would like.
Even Star Citizen allows seamless travel to planets. Personally, I'd be more happier if a future update completely overhauls the Creation Engine 2 to allow seamless planetary travel without loading screens and most importantly, more interesting planets, sidequests, POI, etc. Although, a little female fanservice/eye candy also wouldn't hurt.
I always liked Starfield, it's the game I've been waiting for since I was a kid, the ability to build and walk around your ship alone was enough for me. However, I can see why people think it kinda sucks. But it's still receiving updates meaning it can obviously get better. To me it's great and making a game like it is beyond difficult. Which isn't something I'd say if we weren't talking about Bethesda. The Skyrim guys, one of gaming's last bastions of creativity or at least of moderate fun. Right up there with CD Project Red and FromSoft. Gotta support them now before they sell out COMPLETLY. Besides they've only ever let us down when they were forced to make something, like RedFall or if they do something different like Fallout 76. Their good at what they do, have faith They'll fix Starfield, and that Elder Scrolls 6 will be great. Loyalty my friends, at least until thery truly fail us.
@@Zack29810 Which would be deserved, but for now im more worried about them getting swallowed up by a bigger conglomerate and forced to make actual bad games as opposed to things like starfield which was just more of a letdown than failure. Recently heard that's what fromsoft is about to do, get swallowed up be Sony.
Doing the temples is completely optional outside of the first temple. The temples only suck ass if you force yourself to do them over and over and over back to back. If you just do the temples as you naturally come across them (not talking to Vladimir) Its just a side objective to pursue on your own time. Just relax and do what seems fun when you play this game and you will have fun.
I play vast amounts of Starfield (1500+ hrs .. Yes 1500) because there is not much else about that suits my rigid tastes of single player RPG. My all time favourite game being RDR2, to give some idea. My main issue with Starfield on my Xbox Series S is that it is horribly unstable and often ludicrous. For example, I presently cannot finish the Ruyjin quest because … Whilst I can enter the correct building in New Atlantis .. it will NOT LET ME OUT!!! No joke, it just crashes, every single time. Plus … I cannot really go to the Well, it will not let me out of the elevators. Plus .. I cannot go to Akilah City, it will not even let me land … If I do manage to get there I can enter but never leave the Rock or the Trackers Alliance Plus .. Every time I go to Cydonia … it crashes as I attempt to enter or leave. Plus … There are various bugs stopping various small side quests working, such as collecting DNA for the Cydonia Terra Morph Lab. 99/100 of the time the game will not allow me to exit save. I lost my first 560 hrs play because of that I cannot get onto Va'ruun Kai without it crashing 9 out of 10 attempts. Then within 5 minutes it'll crash anyway … I CANNOT complete the Duel quest at all for crashing. *_Bethesda on it's own site KNOWS this is an issue on Xbox Series … Their major answer? ….. "Err, turn your internet off it'll help a bit."_* Seriously? .. Yeah, we'll fix it sometime when we can be bothered …. Apparently
I'm looking forward to playing this. I just switched to a series x and downloaded this with game pass. I think this should be a good time and perfectly good if you haven't paid a dime for it but I imagine frustrating at full price
@ yeah but $20 a month for hundreds of games is not the same financial commitment as $70 for a single game. paying for the service is not paying for the specific game
To be honest - I expected Skyrim in space and I got Skyrim in space. I knew from the start that they will not pull off a AAA title and it will not look and feel like AAA title. For everything that I have expected from Bethesda as a person who started his gaming journey with Morrowind (my first game as a child) - I got everything that I have expected. Buggy and messy toy that I constantly need to fix and mod in order to enjoy. Problem is in the fact that they still consider something like this an complete product that should keep up with todays games, that you pay for that and the last part is the problem that they constantly oversell their stuff with marketing and openly lie to us years on end now.
I was about to download Starfield again before I watched this. Thank you for saving my time 🙏 This game could be soo good if they actually made an effort
And here i am saving money for the winter sale to buy the game lmao. I enjoyed mostly the ship building but.thisnvideo made me want to wait another 5 years where it becomes like 10 dollars to buy hopefully
I might get flake/stones thrown at me but I genuinely feel like starfield has Potential, sure there might be the grim reality bethesda never polishes this rough game to the standard of Cyberpunk, but I still have hope! What I find fun in the game for me, is essentially trying to mimic a satisfactory playstyle as well as do niche missions, and my adhd tendencies have not let me complete shattered space yet, I give this opinion in due part of basis that this is Bethesda's new universe and franchise, and I know some devs have been rude to some interviews but aside from that I give Starfield a wide berth of hopefulness since its a new franchise and who knows we might get Starfield II haha (Being satirical here pls dont hurt me) overally, i stand with my personal rating of a 7/10, pretty alright and I LOVE the details of the food items and whatnot.
Asmon lost 40 minutes? I literally lost 80 hours since the game only puts 100 (of your oldest) saves on Steam cloud. Had to reset my PC, came back to play and I was only 30 hours in to my current 110 playthrough. I lost 80 hours... I was looking forward into playing the DLC but now I don't want to. I don't want to have to re-play the whole game again.
I assume you can backup the save files manually. I started doing this with Elden Ring on PC when my one and only 100 hour game file got corrupted. The steam backup was the corrupted save too. It’s just a file on your pc. Now all games I play I regularly backup the save files.
i still hope they continue improve the game expand soem gamesystem and improve current gamesystem. I realy hope they have long term plans to do this so the game gets better and better and at some point is close to the game we all have hoped for
I will admit Starfield is pretty much objectively worse than F4, or ES5. But despite that, it still provides a certain type of game that really no other game does. And I have 400 hours into it, and "with mods" I'm still enjoying every minute. It's a platform. For people like us to build on. To me all Bethesda games have been nothing but platforms. Some are less stable/impressive than others, but so long as they are a clay that is moldable by modders, they serve their purpose. What other game does that on this level? I don't WANT Bethesda games to update to modern graphics or modern techniques. Because it will make it that much more difficult for modders to work their magic. And THEY are what makes EVERY Bethesda game to me. With Starfield itself, I understand why it falls short. It had two writers. Look into it. *Two* in-house Bethesda writers worked on Starfield. Bethesda is still fully capable of making a Skyrim, or maybe even a new Vegas. The people who made those games are still there. It's just a matter of DIRECTION, and Influence. It's a matter of community feedback being loud, and unified. And to me, the fact that I know the talent is still there, gives me hope. As oppose to a company like 343 industries. Who replace over half their staff every single halo game. With the last of the Bungie OG's being fired in 2013 with Marty O'Donnell. Meanwhile the guy who was corporatizing Bungie in 2007 before being pushed out by it's original founders, is now the CEO of Bungie. (Monsieur, Pete Parsons) So long as Bethesda games remain a platform for people who can freely express their passion with mods, I will continue to love the games they make. (Except for 76. You can't mod that mess of a game..... Atleast it's fun with friends.) But that's not what I play Bethesda games for. Leave me alone, let me make my female companions busty (even though I'm gay, I do it anyways), let me make my dragon a into macho man, and let me turn my new Atlantis UC guards into stormtroopers so I can pretend Lukas Games actually made a good star wars game since 2005.
since i had early access for starfield, i was able to play the story and explore the rest, it was awful and was able to refund it before it launched and never came to the idea to buy it again lol. game basically has nothing that catches you, cyberpunk & skyrim still the best open world rpgs imo
It’s not bad with the 60FPS mode it’s actually not a terrible game I caught myself giving it a chance recently again after I didn’t play it after launch it’s not bad I don’t know what people expect from this game the ones that complain I have the series X and it’s a great on there in my opinion
@@dmhzmxn😂 it is you silly excuse. Its not only in the same category but most of the open world space exploration with combat and base building games are. Do you know which ones I've been talking about? Here. Star citizen, star trek online, Starfeild, Star wars Outlaws, No man's sky, space engineers... +More. All can be compared to eachother, all have atleast 4 of the same main points and all revolve around space. Midfeild is a joke. So much so that modders are publicly announcing they're no longer making mods and quitting on the creation club mod page because Bethesda greed and pushing paid mods. It's bad, and the comparisons show you just how bad.
I was 60+ hour's into Cyberpunk 2077 and recently started playing Starfield due to the latest patch fixing a bugged quest i was on. Im now not wanting to play Cyberpunk because im so hucked again. The game is such a chill i love it and if i was stuck on a gaming desert island 🏝️ and could have the one or the other im choosing Starfield. So it's certainly a good game to many and far from boaring
I never had an issue with starfield beyond the fps rates until the newer uodates. I think everyone thought it was going to be this game that was like a nms/starfield baby, and i knew from the get go it was going to be a textbook bethesda game in space and i had no disappointments
pony boy haters r gonna hate. ANd this wanker is one of the worst, he got the buggy and immediately took his max size class C ship to the smallest confined landing field and wondered why his buggy spawned in a wall. Notice he did show it where he bought it which wouldve been at one of the larger enclosed ports, an when he did show it he showned it bugged which my series X hasnt done yet. Maybe the pony is playing on a 30 year old PC which cant run starfield, Maybe hes got a illegal mod for his PS to play it and thats why its screwing up. All that assside his buggy in the wall was his fault an im betting he did it on purpose to shit on starfield!
For crying out loud, when will ENB be ready for the game?! Is it even in the works? It looks so drab! I can somewhat stomach playing Skyrim and Fallout without ENB, but in regards to Starfieid - mission impossible.
I really loved Fallout 4. It was one of the best games I have ever played, so I had really high hopes for this game. I played it shortly after release, then ditched it for obvious reasons. Now I think I just have to realise - this game is never gonna be a good game. Bethesda simply fucked up.😢
I quit playing this game due to the bugs! Made it really unplayable could not upgrade my ships certain missions would not work. I put hours and hours months into it for nothing! The second time I replayed it i couldn’t get past level 17 the bugs and missions were worse!
*For those who might want to try out Starfield, get it on sale here with up to 90% off various games* 👀👉 shorturl.at/GY3fv
You're doing God's work saving us time and money. So glad I never played this shit game.
Why would anybody wanna try this game for money just get game pass then you get all these other good games and one piece of crap
Game constantly crashes when saving, so even though I love the game, it is now a dumpster fire for me. Started crashing after the latest patch. Devs don't give a shit.
@@christianhill4404 Gamepass is free?
The only people who should ever play Starfield are content creators. Objective waste of money for anyone else unless they've had a recent lobotomy
Its been nearly one year since star field was released and it has been nearly 1 year since I played it LOL.
😂😂😂 don’t blame ya
Bro should host (insert named gaming event) and make that joke directly to Todd Howard's face.
After seeing this game I'm actually concerned for elder scrolls 6
same....but i'd like my fuckin money back :/
same lol
At least no loading screen to enter vehicle 🙂. Amazing how they decided on a "buggy" for the first vehicle.
Thanks man
notice that it doesn't drive well on uneven terrain 4:56. Skyrim horse would never
@@PeterPanbe Amazing?? Lol
@@mrfishsticks266 I believe it's sarcasm
@PeterPanbe actually look at a beta of qanga even that is better than starfield and my star citizen much better now than 10 years ago haha
The game is now better! Now they have to optimize it and remove all the stumping long loading screens and make worlds actually round and interesting
Are the loaing screens shorter? Is it more immersive?
@@gbond1010 ive just started playing this, and i found the loading times to be faster than fo4...
Cyberpunk > Starfield
True
Cyberpunk with 2 years update > Starfield with 1 year update
Give starfield 3 years, like cyberpunk got, and well see
Not comparable
@@GoalOrientedLiftingI would be shocked if Starfield hasn't been completely abandoned by the devs before it hits 3 years. CP has a pretty good story and a lot of interesting things worth exploring, Starfield is just copy and paste garbage. I got all the achievements and reached NG+12 and level 190, but other than the kind of okayish armor it wasn't very fun after +2.
There is something about this game where, I don't even have to be playing it, just seeing it played instantly bores me. I don't think I've ever felt that way about another game in my life. I commend you for trudging through this game. I'll drop a like just for that.
Could be due to looking at the damn loading screens more than playing the damn thing
Isn't it kinda dumb watching videos about stuff that bores you?
The guy recommended the game at the end and your still repeating this nonsense 'starfield is bad' crap
really what is boring about going to a populated city and getting into a brawl or doing the main story / uc story line .
@@syminite1he wouldn’t know it bored him if he didn’t watch
I would be really happy if they added a database for the scanner. You scan stuff, your database updates, you can access it from a terminal on your ship or something. Lets you see what materials can be harvested where. As it sits, your scanner does nothing in-game outside of giving you experience points.
Or see all the various alien life form descriptions would be cool
You mean like in Mass effect or No Mans Sky? IMPOSSIBLE, never been done before.
@@joaocardoletto I mean, those were made by huge companies, you know Bethesda can't compete!
Thank god I can explore empty planets in a go kart instead of on foot now 😂
I may actually play it now
@@Tail472 I quit playing games when I was 14, 5 years later I am a millionaire.
@@persona_yt bs
@@Tail472 That's why your dreams remain dreams.
@persona_yt and your dreams are just dreams and you lie on the internet lmao 🤣 just cuz I play video games don't mean my dreams ain't a reality. Where I live.
i’ve been playing on series x got a save going on 24 hours now and i’ve seen no bugs and it’s been great gameplay. i chose not to play for a long time because of vids like these and people hating but it’s been absolutely wonderful. give it a try yourself and don’t play if you’re impatient it’s not meant for you
Same same I don’t get the harsh criticism of this game at all
Thanks for this review, will definitely check it out
There's a lot of wasted space do you have a bunch of planets that have nothing on them. End every mission is pretty much on repeat
@@TheCincycrazy ahhh damn it looks good visually but I want a good story
I've been playing is since it released and I've never gotten why their is so much hate about this game. I can understand if it's just your cup of tea, but I have hundreds of hours on it and I still enjoy it. I know there's many other people like you who have seen all of the hate videos and therefore haven't tried it for themselves but they would probably enjoy it if they did.
I honestly think it has just become a "cool trend" to hate on this game because of expectations and Bethesda. The main criticisms, load screens/landing cuts/bugs never once bothered me, and I played on launch. Saw maybe 4 visual bugs that's it.
The stories were very interesting because I had zero spoilers. Very nicely done, a lot of mystery.
The textures are the best on the market, beating Cyberpunk. Both are graphically top shelf, Starfield honestly a bit more realistic and fresh. After playing both games for 100-150 hours, I enjoyed them equally.
Even though Starfield is more of a looter, Cyberpunk feels more messy. There's a million random attributes that have almost no impact, and the looting is quite random. You display separate clothes than you equip. In Starfield, you get to know all of the manufacturers closely, for weapons and ships, it's a better RPG in the systems-sense.
For Cyberpunk, the action during missions is movie like, and more immersive. Crazy shit happening all the time that really pulls you along, whilst Starfield keeps you in the athmosphere without many cut-scenes, simple and quite realistic.
You use realistic as a quality like it means anything other than "This game is so dull that the hum drum of real life is vastly more entertaining than it."
As well, you have a serious chip on your shoulder about Cyberpunk. I dislike the cyberpunk genre as a rule, but you cannot tell me in any capacity that Starfield is better than it because "its more realistic" as the only thing you can say about it. This review is comical, let alone the accusation that people dislike this half baked trash because it's popular to.
@ballisticwaffles last I checked realistic graphics was the main selling point of most consoles and games since the launch of the ps3 and XBox360. Though I agree graphics mean nothing if the game play is bad.
7:17 the main story doesnt require you to do the 24 temples, only the first one is mandatory. If you skip the main quest on NG+, you get a much shorter quest and 0 temple is mandatory.
I was just exaggerating. But to me it feels more like 40. I’ve still not finished them all that’s how bored I got with them 😢
When this update came out I bought the RAV right away, then I turned off my console. I'm not even joking, I didn't even drive it. Just the thought of playing it was enough for me.
The thought of playing elder scrolls 6 should be more than enough for you then
As it should be
I personally love starfield with my 144 hours into it and on my third playthrough with the custom difficulty and I plan to beat it just before the dlc and then playing that immediately
Same here
Thats really cool thank you Bethesda employee and Tom Howard on a throwaway account
@xIcyStarzz-yz7my Ah that must mean I'm also a Bethesda employee because I like starfield too :3
@@jasperfox6821 that's not something to be proud of. If the studio that made Starfield is gonna make ES6 and we just let them take shortcuts I don't think it's going to be fun based off what was presented to us in starfield and saying its okay basically is giving up on the next elder scrolls game
@@xIcyStarzz-yz7my I see what yee mean, but oh well. I enjoy starfield, sue me. It's decent but not as good as morrowind or oblivion.
3:16 bro this was too funny wtf 🤣🤣
1:35 never seen that before. How weird is that?
Ikr never seen that before
@@L321 i've seen it too after this update weird
when planets show that its just a mod or 2 messing up
thats so funny bc thasts what the planets looked like the first time i even played 😭😭 i thought they were supposed to be like that
Bethesda: Adds a single car that doesn't have a docker and you can only change the color of it.
The players: It's actually good now
It is, even there will be times when people will say that you are actually fine now😻
Game constantly crashes when saving, so even though I love the game, it is now a dumpster fire for me. Started crashing after the latest patch. Devs don't give a shit.
Using saves created in a previous version of a game can do that.
*What are your honest thoughts on Starfield? Have you played it recently?*
It's exactly the same as before. Small bug fixes and some quality of life changes, but the Outpost's (major feature) are broken.
Also I think your low subscriber count may be due to the fact that you use so much "British" in your videos and the subscriber base is mostly USA. I don't know what your main target audience is, but half the words you use, I don't know what it means.
It's amazing! Also your mods is why you're crying.
@@L321 mods have ironed out 50% of the issues already. Which is A LOT faster than i expected. Now essentially we need to wait for some DLCs(all Bethesda games have been fleshed out and fixed by DLCs, even new Vegas) and the larger mods to drop
@@GoalOrientedLiftingthe base game should be “fun” from the start the difference between starfield and othe bgs games is that the core game loop is just boring. All of the poi are just randomly generated same stuff on every planet. Morrowind, oblivion, skyrim, fallout 3, and even fallout 4 had curated locations that made the setting feel alive and interesting. In starfield you have to go through multiple loading screens before you even get to explore and by the time you do, you realize it’s all just procedurally generated and has no point. Hey if you like the game I am happy for you but almost all bgs games are good without dlc… the main game is supposed to get me excited for upcoming dlc, not hope for it to complete an unfinished game lol
Love the game and can’t wait for the dlc
The fact that the buggy was not at launch is wild. I played the game, enjoyed the story, My only complaint is the repetitive dungeons and empty planets.
Just sub, i apperiate your raw straight foward opinion, keep reviewing older games as now in days most games arent really completed for like 1 to 2 years after release
Looks like Bethesda didn't call it buggy for no reason...
starfield is so good man i love it and have since early access
Good game maybe destined for greatness.... Shattered space will decide. Not long now!
@@skyriminspaceI think shattered space will be very good and give us a lot of stuff. And in turn the modders will have more stuff to. I'll always support modders.
@@Juiciejuice 100%.
Yo this guy funny😂😂😂 I have to subscribe, keep up ur work bro
The difference between Cyberpunk and Starfield is that Cyberpunk was good right after release. Yea, we had some whining people, but they were lied that CP works on older consoles/computers, which it didn't, but as time progressed those people just upgraded their machines and boom - "Cyberpunk great now"
Starfield is just not good and they have to make a new game in order to fix it...
Are you dumb? Don't start making up lies and b.s. man. Cyberpunk was a buggy and unplayable mess when it first launched. It wasn't until maybe a year ago that it was much MUCH better. And that happened 4 years AFTER it's release! Look I think starfield is bad too, and just like you I like Cyberpunk lore. But the video game was trash until they put more time, updates and love into the game. Don't lie about that
cyberpunk has never been good
@AltsekBUL dude don't do that there is no reason to lie. Cyberpunk is good "now" it was never like that before. It's release was messy and it was unplayable until I'd say 2 or 3 years ago. So yeah those "whiners" were right for a long time. I like Cyberpunk too, but don't at like it was always great.
@@LymeGreen04 You're right, it is great
@BengaloFFM it's really not though
Started in Nov '23.Stopped in Jan '24 bored with it.
Went back 2 to 3 weeks ago and started from the beginning with a few Creation mods running.
A much better experience all round- it looks and plays miles better, some of the side missions are very good.
Pity it wasn't like this from the off.
Interesting. I played the same time frame, I put quite a few hours in and then realized the game kinda sucks and stopped. Maybe it’s time to try it again.
Not saying Starfield is good, it's just ok, but ok I think is still better than what Elder Scrolls Online and Fallout 76 was at launch. So... progress? Lol XD
Here enjoying the game after finishing my 35th play through of fallout new Vegas and I can say after getting used to the game 20 hours in I’m enjoying it a lot and have had no shortage of things to do. I’ve also had zero bugs so far.
Absolutely not. First thing I would do if I had billions of dollars would be to buy Bethesda and fire Todd Howard.
So Emil can stay then?
If that's the first thing you would do if you had billions of dollars, then you're no better than Todd lol
@@captainawf2341 well it’s not the first thing I would do, but it would be on my list
I would press the button that just erases emil from the timeline ... I guarantee the moment it happen, Skyrim would magically split into about 3 or 4 genuinely good Elder Scrolls spinoffs, each one focused on a particular race and particular location. My favourite would have been Allthall , Contienent of Champions basically the island is a huge fucking Gladiator battle arena filled with "throw aways", or maybe Just orcs , or maybe just like rule breakers anyways it would tie into the High Elfs story where they fix up crystal balls to allow essentially "Pay Per View" , and people from all over the skyrim planet join and watch.
Part of Allthall would be you breaking out of Gladiator battle either by conquest, or cunning only to be met with High elves who specialize in both of those things , wacky interactions abound
I haven't played this game since it dropped. I'm waiting for this game to do a total of 360 like NMS. Just how NMS made me jump back on it with the World's Part 1 update.
Aparently that is now possible because of the limited engine Bethesda uses which also makes it impossible to be fixed with mods
.... 3:51.... was that your scream or the NPC? 😂😂😂😂
land vehicleS? All I see is one buggy buggy, and I`d rather play astroneer than waste my time with that. Also praising the game for being better than when it released is ridiculous and pointless, because it could barely be called a game at that point. Yes, I`m pissed, but I`m also right.
2:25 wtf is this game, but that is hilarious lol
it kinda depresses me how bad this game is. I used to love Bethesda so much.
This game is GREAT!!! if you enjoy wasting 70$ and 120gb of storage. If you want to play a space game just get NMS ffs
NMS was a giant pile of crap when it released too. It took years to finally be good.
Do you need a xbox gamepass to play starfield? If i was to purchase the game at full price. Do i need a subscription to play?
Really like your armor. What’s it called?
This has made exploration alot better cus its certainly more fun exploring with a car than it is hopping around like a idiot but i still don't find the game fun since its mainly just sitting in loading screens and i dont find much of the quests / world interesting. like it really just makes me want to go and play no mans sky / fallout 4 again whenever i try to play it. ill admit its getting better but i dont think they are gonna be able to fix the game to the point ill actuly want to play it for longer than a few hours. Like i just cant see them fixing the loading screen bombardment the game is littered with and they cant fix how bad the main quest is. I just dont understand how no mans sky can do seamless plant to plant travle in 2014 yet this game released only a year ago needs to load just to enter the ship then take off then travel to the space around a planet then to land on the planet and then to exit the ship. to go from 1 planet to another is almost 5 load screens and even on my super fast ssd it still takes longer than i would like.
Even Star Citizen allows seamless travel to planets. Personally, I'd be more happier if a future update completely overhauls the Creation Engine 2 to allow seamless planetary travel without loading screens and most importantly, more interesting planets, sidequests, POI, etc.
Although, a little female fanservice/eye candy also wouldn't hurt.
I always liked Starfield, it's the game I've been waiting for since I was a kid, the ability to build and walk around your ship alone was enough for me. However, I can see why people think it kinda sucks. But it's still receiving updates meaning it can obviously get better. To me it's great and making a game like it is beyond difficult. Which isn't something I'd say if we weren't talking about Bethesda. The Skyrim guys, one of gaming's last bastions of creativity or at least of moderate fun. Right up there with CD Project Red and FromSoft. Gotta support them now before they sell out COMPLETLY. Besides they've only ever let us down when they were forced to make something, like RedFall or if they do something different like Fallout 76. Their good at what they do, have faith They'll fix Starfield, and that Elder Scrolls 6 will be great. Loyalty my friends, at least until thery truly fail us.
they've already failed us twice. Fallout 76 and Starfield. one more and a lot of people are gonna jump ship.
@@Zack29810 Which would be deserved, but for now im more worried about them getting swallowed up by a bigger conglomerate and forced to make actual bad games as opposed to things like starfield which was just more of a letdown than failure. Recently heard that's what fromsoft is about to do, get swallowed up be Sony.
Every sane Starfield player plays it in mandalorian armor 🙌
Doing the temples is completely optional outside of the first temple. The temples only suck ass if you force yourself to do them over and over and over back to back. If you just do the temples as you naturally come across them (not talking to Vladimir) Its just a side objective to pursue on your own time.
Just relax and do what seems fun when you play this game and you will have fun.
Great advice.
That's true lol
I'd rather play no man's sky. That game is so much better, especially with friends which I don't have.
Fact: Over 95% of commenters never even played it.
I actually think most have played it. I put 30 hours in it because every review at the time said it gets good later, it never got good.
@@redvirknight9430 Most people have played it? That's just incorrect.
@@YouthEnergy Most people in the comments blockhead
@@redvirknight9430 Maybe in the comments in this video, sure. Go to any Starfield video Luke Stephens has made for a different story.
Though name a Bethesda game where the main quest isn't completely boring compared to the side quests.
I play vast amounts of Starfield (1500+ hrs .. Yes 1500) because there is not much else about that suits my rigid tastes of single player RPG. My all time favourite game being RDR2, to give some idea.
My main issue with Starfield on my Xbox Series S is that it is horribly unstable and often ludicrous.
For example, I presently cannot finish the Ruyjin quest because … Whilst I can enter the correct building in New Atlantis .. it will NOT LET ME OUT!!! No joke, it just crashes, every single time.
Plus … I cannot really go to the Well, it will not let me out of the elevators.
Plus .. I cannot go to Akilah City, it will not even let me land … If I do manage to get there I can enter but never leave the Rock or the Trackers Alliance
Plus .. Every time I go to Cydonia … it crashes as I attempt to enter or leave.
Plus … There are various bugs stopping various small side quests working, such as collecting DNA for the Cydonia Terra Morph Lab.
99/100 of the time the game will not allow me to exit save. I lost my first 560 hrs play because of that
I cannot get onto Va'ruun Kai without it crashing 9 out of 10 attempts. Then within 5 minutes it'll crash anyway … I CANNOT complete the Duel quest at all for crashing.
*_Bethesda on it's own site KNOWS this is an issue on Xbox Series … Their major answer? ….. "Err, turn your internet off it'll help a bit."_*
Seriously? .. Yeah, we'll fix it sometime when we can be bothered …. Apparently
Love the narration 😂😂😂 #Hilarious
I played for around 250 hours and loved it but I don't think this is enough to draw me back in. Maybe in another year.
Bethesda trying to do a space game, is similar to watching James Gunn take over Superman. Like.. why are you like this lol?
I'm looking forward to playing this. I just switched to a series x and downloaded this with game pass. I think this should be a good time and perfectly good if you haven't paid a dime for it but I imagine frustrating at full price
you pay for Game Pass though.
@ yeah but $20 a month for hundreds of games is not the same financial commitment as $70 for a single game. paying for the service is not paying for the specific game
To be honest - I expected Skyrim in space and I got Skyrim in space. I knew from the start that they will not pull off a AAA title and it will not look and feel like AAA title. For everything that I have expected from Bethesda as a person who started his gaming journey with Morrowind (my first game as a child) - I got everything that I have expected. Buggy and messy toy that I constantly need to fix and mod in order to enjoy.
Problem is in the fact that they still consider something like this an complete product that should keep up with todays games, that you pay for that and the last part is the problem that they constantly oversell their stuff with marketing and openly lie to us years on end now.
I was about to download Starfield again before I watched this. Thank you for saving my time 🙏
This game could be soo good if they actually made an effort
And here i am saving money for the winter sale to buy the game lmao. I enjoyed mostly the ship building but.thisnvideo made me want to wait another 5 years where it becomes like 10 dollars to buy hopefully
Main quest still sucks. So no, not worth wasting time with.
Main quest is still terrible but the side missions are good
@@L321 Side quest are good for like an hour until you've literally seen everything else the game has to offer.
And here I was just thinking that maybe people support it because it has a solid story...
call me crazy why tf does his character look like the mandalorian
It's a mod.
@@dtube441 ok how am I supposed know that
@@LTK2.0 lol I wasn't being funny I was just getting to the point
You're crazy.
There is a reason the vehicle is called 'buggy'.
I might get flake/stones thrown at me but I genuinely feel like starfield has Potential, sure there might be the grim reality bethesda never polishes this rough game to the standard of Cyberpunk, but I still have hope! What I find fun in the game for me, is essentially trying to mimic a satisfactory playstyle as well as do niche missions, and my adhd tendencies have not let me complete shattered space yet, I give this opinion in due part of basis that this is Bethesda's new universe and franchise, and I know some devs have been rude to some interviews but aside from that I give Starfield a wide berth of hopefulness since its a new franchise and who knows we might get Starfield II haha (Being satirical here pls dont hurt me) overally, i stand with my personal rating of a 7/10, pretty alright and I LOVE the details of the food items and whatnot.
So immersive, such wow.
Loving the videos mate, I'm still one of those 2.3% subscribed watching your videos 👍
Thank you man
@@L321All good bro 👍
2.3 might be pretty good, means there's a lot of passing traffic.
Been a long time since i did TH-cam as a business & studied the algo's.
How did you get Mando's outfit?
Asmon lost 40 minutes? I literally lost 80 hours since the game only puts 100 (of your oldest) saves on Steam cloud. Had to reset my PC, came back to play and I was only 30 hours in to my current 110 playthrough. I lost 80 hours... I was looking forward into playing the DLC but now I don't want to. I don't want to have to re-play the whole game again.
I assume you can backup the save files manually. I started doing this with Elden Ring on PC when my one and only 100 hour game file got corrupted. The steam backup was the corrupted save too. It’s just a file on your pc. Now all games I play I regularly backup the save files.
It’s 2024, I’m surprised Bethesda hasn’t figured out how to patch the loading screen issue
i still hope they continue improve the game expand soem gamesystem and improve current gamesystem. I realy hope they have long term plans to do this so the game gets better and better and at some point is close to the game we all have hoped for
I will admit Starfield is pretty much objectively worse than F4, or ES5.
But despite that, it still provides a certain type of game that really no other game does. And I have 400 hours into it, and "with mods" I'm still enjoying every minute.
It's a platform. For people like us to build on. To me all Bethesda games have been nothing but platforms. Some are less stable/impressive than others, but so long as they are a clay that is moldable by modders, they serve their purpose. What other game does that on this level?
I don't WANT Bethesda games to update to modern graphics or modern techniques. Because it will make it that much more difficult for modders to work their magic. And THEY are what makes EVERY Bethesda game to me.
With Starfield itself, I understand why it falls short. It had two writers. Look into it. *Two* in-house Bethesda writers worked on Starfield.
Bethesda is still fully capable of making a Skyrim, or maybe even a new Vegas. The people who made those games are still there. It's just a matter of DIRECTION, and Influence. It's a matter of community feedback being loud, and unified.
And to me, the fact that I know the talent is still there, gives me hope. As oppose to a company like 343 industries. Who replace over half their staff every single halo game. With the last of the Bungie OG's being fired in 2013 with Marty O'Donnell.
Meanwhile the guy who was corporatizing Bungie in 2007 before being pushed out by it's original founders, is now the CEO of Bungie.
(Monsieur, Pete Parsons)
So long as Bethesda games remain a platform for people who can freely express their passion with mods, I will continue to love the games they make.
(Except for 76. You can't mod that mess of a game..... Atleast it's fun with friends.)
But that's not what I play Bethesda games for.
Leave me alone, let me make my female companions busty (even though I'm gay, I do it anyways), let me make my dragon a into macho man, and let me turn my new Atlantis UC guards into stormtroopers so I can pretend Lukas Games actually made a good star wars game since 2005.
Can I play without game pass? Plz tell me if you know ❤️
yeah, if you buy the game.
your options are purchasing Starfield, or subscribing to the game pass.
I appreciate you making me laugh so much it made me shit my pants that's the mark of a good TH-camr in my book
I think it's as fun as the outer worlds, even though the story isn't as well written.
since i had early access for starfield, i was able to play the story and explore the rest, it was awful and was able to refund it before it launched and never came to the idea to buy it again lol.
game basically has nothing that catches you, cyberpunk & skyrim still the best open world rpgs imo
It is much better now but still far from perfect
Nope, still boring. Bereft of awesome exploration and meaningful storyline
It’s not bad with the 60FPS mode it’s actually not a terrible game I caught myself giving it a chance recently again after I didn’t play it after launch it’s not bad I don’t know what people expect from this game the ones that complain I have the series X and it’s a great on there in my opinion
You can also levitate with the buggy when pressing space.
Don't load it on SSD cards like they said and it will work. Also you cannot run it on a 65' bigscreen tv.
Starfield can't even get a single player space game ground vehicle physics right, and you guys hate on star citizen
Actually facts lol
Completely incomparable.
@@dmhzmxn😂 it is you silly excuse. Its not only in the same category but most of the open world space exploration with combat and base building games are. Do you know which ones I've been talking about? Here. Star citizen, star trek online, Starfeild, Star wars Outlaws, No man's sky, space engineers... +More.
All can be compared to eachother, all have atleast 4 of the same main points and all revolve around space.
Midfeild is a joke. So much so that modders are publicly announcing they're no longer making mods and quitting on the creation club mod page because Bethesda greed and pushing paid mods.
It's bad, and the comparisons show you just how bad.
3:10 as a halo player I take offense to that 😂
Where do you get the Mandalorin Character from?
Best commentary ever
I was 60+ hour's into Cyberpunk 2077 and recently started playing Starfield due to the latest patch fixing a bugged quest i was on. Im now not wanting to play Cyberpunk because im so hucked again. The game is such a chill i love it and if i was stuck on a gaming desert island 🏝️ and could have the one or the other im choosing Starfield. So it's certainly a good game to many and far from boaring
Hey if I downgrind my gta 4 to oldest version will my all gaming progress will be lost???
Yes I think so. Make sure to backup your gamesave
Boosteroid's performance is top-tier. You won't regret joining
I never had an issue with starfield beyond the fps rates until the newer uodates. I think everyone thought it was going to be this game that was like a nms/starfield baby, and i knew from the get go it was going to be a textbook bethesda game in space and i had no disappointments
Love watching all the people trained to live to hate on random things (varies by class)
I personally love starield on Xbox series x❤
Same here… the haters are just insufferable at this point. It’s not a bad game
pony boy haters r gonna hate.
ANd this wanker is one of the worst, he got the buggy and immediately took his max size class C ship to the smallest confined landing field and wondered why his buggy spawned in a wall. Notice he did show it where he bought it which wouldve been at one of the larger enclosed ports, an when he did show it he showned it bugged which my series X hasnt done yet.
Maybe the pony is playing on a 30 year old PC which cant run starfield, Maybe hes got a illegal mod for his PS to play it and thats why its screwing up.
All that assside his buggy in the wall was his fault an im betting he did it on purpose to shit on starfield!
@@domymbd do you remember skyrim when that first came out? It got the same hate
See ya later I’m going back to Skyrim
Game has always been amazing
Vehicles have always been crap in their engine. Modders tried to make them a thing MANY times and it was jank every time.
I think the problem is, people are exepacting a bathesda to be something other than a Bethesda game
No way he says Cyberpunk sucks but then says this is good
Remember when u used to advertise 360s even tho they was long dead
I always wait a year after release to play any Bethesda game
When the game allows PC mods on console, it will flourish like Skyrim V.
It does lol
Boosteroid's reliability and performance are unmatched
the subtitle and the choices don't show up any one know how to fix it
....3:32... He turned Starfield into GTA-6
IT JUST WORKS!
For crying out loud, when will ENB be ready for the game?! Is it even in the works? It looks so drab! I can somewhat stomach playing Skyrim and Fallout without ENB, but in regards to Starfieid - mission impossible.
I really loved Fallout 4. It was one of the best games I have ever played, so I had really high hopes for this game. I played it shortly after release, then ditched it for obvious reasons. Now I think I just have to realise - this game is never gonna be a good game. Bethesda simply fucked up.😢
I love the game. I get why everyone hates it. I really really do but I like the relaxing (boring) game play. Sue me.
Starfield was always fun
Boosteroid has really taken my gaming experience to the next level
This can never be good, they would need to remake it from scratch.
I quit playing this game due to the bugs! Made it really unplayable could not upgrade my ships certain missions would not work. I put hours and hours months into it for nothing! The second time I replayed it i couldn’t get past level 17 the bugs and missions were worse!
Yea it's worth it. Exploring space. Stories. Especially if you smoke smoke 😂