Please think about supporting us, fellas. We give away ~$2k in gift certs to Top Gun Supply and Blue Alpha EVERY month, plus access to the VIP only Discord where James and Hop make the occasional dreaded appearance: www.subscribestar.com/tfbtv
Now that you mention it, it would actually make a lot of sense if Magpul has been semi-intentionally delaying the launch of the FDP until after they had launched their in-house (ish) Glock FCU. B&T already released their BWC9 using a P320 chassis, so Magpul couldn’t just drop their own folding P320 abomination, but perhaps there’s some design benefits to using a chassis style FCU in a folding sub gun.
Magpul: "Damn! We have all these aftermarket Glock magazines but they keep buying OEM magazines!" Ruger: "Well, hello there sonny....would you like to make a few nickels?"
I purchased 24 PMAG 15 GL9 magazine's and have been running the crap out of them for the past 5 years with 100% reliability and 0% breakage. I'm not a fan of this chassis and frame though.
@@alanmeyers3957 yeah i like them too. Never had a problem with them. Except they dont like steel case, but thats ok because i dont like steel case either.
PMAGS generally outsells the OEM in stores. And a lot of the PCCs, AR9’s and Glock clones come with PMAGS in the box. They didn’t need help selling mags.
I’ve never had an issue with pmags either. The only real (valid) complaint I have about Glocks is that mags tend not to drop out without a flick of the wrist to get it moving.
@@relevation0 Cheated on his wife, married again, cheated on her, cheated on his mistress with a side piece. Women just throw themselves at him and he cant control himself.
And the Springfield Echelon. The Echelon is essentially a gen 3 Glock clone with a chassis system... The same as this. I'm a big fan of Magpul, though, so I'd probably like the Ruger better... If I didn't dislike the Glock grip angle.
Magpul is already showing the grip frame for sale. Looks like for a couple twenty dollar bills you can get a different color. Only black and stealth grey are on the website now.
Not only does James steal his little sister's shirts, he has the balls to steal her shorts. Much respect. Now... what's this little pistol we have here?...
I'd like to see an arm wrestling match between James and Mike. I know where my money is. Because ones a based Chad and the other wears girls clothes and sits to pee.
Apparently the gen 485769 is going to be exactly the same as the gen 3, but with no trigger group. I cannot wait to spend more than the firearm on mods.
@@BlackRifleBear I’m a Canik fanboy, but S&W knocked the 2.0 series out of the park. I’ve had a couple and really liked them. Excellent quality at a far more reasonable price than the higher end stuff.
Ruger has always been a solid company and always made great products for the price. It's only the young newbies that think ruger has little credibility. In my opinion NOBODY under 25 has any credibility.
Don't forget no stupid plate required for multiple optics options. For Glock, without a plate, you can only get Holosun SDS. And to be honest, quality of CHPWS went down rapidly as they are using chinesium made screws which like to broke after 2-4 thousands of rounds. So CHPWS is no longer an option
It's an amalgamation of the last 25 years of striker fired pistols with Magpul support right from the start. Seems well thought out. With the right execution they could take a nice chunk of the Glock clone market and maybe Sig as well.
GEISLER DEFENCE looks way better and cheaper and you can just pick your own slide for 200 and buy a 30 dollar flat trigger and trigger bar etc. all for $280
$499 MSRP means it'll be $399 within a year unless something crazy happens. Ruger stuff tends to get pretty cheap when the hype wears off. Heck you can often get an LCP Max for $250 and the MSRP for that was $449. And that was easily the best pocket pistol on the market until the Bodyguard 2.0 came out.
@@My-Name-Isnt-Important my thoughts exactly, dude. I think Ruger would sell way more rifles if it took stanag mags. If Ruger doesn’t wanna put the engineering/development investment in to make that work, I’d accept mini-14 PMAG’s as an viable substitute…assuming they’d cost less than the ridiculous $42/ea that Ruger sells their mags for.
I’ve never been a big fan of Ruger’s centerfire pistols. The American series, SR series and P series never really impressed me. I’m glad Ruger is doing something different by doing something plain.
My American compact seems indestructible, but it's a 3" barrel and 12 round default capacity and still manages to weigh 7 ounces more than my P99. It feels fine in the hand, balance is nice, grip shape and master grip interface are nice, the fat, blocky shape calls up associations with my USP, but I'm not a fan of the position of the safety. The slide lock does not reliably engage, and will not engage at all with two of my four magazines. When I got the gun, there was drill kerf inside the striker channel causing intermittent light strikes. Like one out of three rounds or worse just wouldn't fire. I fixed that by disassembling the slide and cleaning it by flushing it with contact cleaner and then compressed air. I attempted to fix the slide lock issue by disassembling the frame to remove the slide lock lever for adjustment, but to my dismay, Ruger says it requires special tools not available to the consumer for reassembly. THey helpfully offered to fix it and then have a look at the slide lock issue. They said they were unable to duplicate the problem though. Still, cost me nothing. Like the USP, it's overweight, under capacity, probably indestructible, but suffering weight penalties as a result. I've been trying to re-sell it to buy more mags and a proper tritium sight set for my P99, but nobody seems to want to buy it.
I have a real love/hate thing with Ruger's pistols. My P89 is something I had always wanted to own, it's fun to shoot. It's also like carrying an ingot of lead on my belt. Security-9 is a nice gun to shoot and carry, but the slide finish is sub par and it just feels a bit cheap. Ruger has done a good job of positioning itself as the common man's, Ford F-150 type, gun maker. But almost too good a job-- they're leaning a little too much into the lower end, in my opinion, and risk coming off as cheap brand-- which I do not want to see happen. I own many Rugers. I'm a Ruger fan-boy. I love my Blackhawk, Mini-14 (stainless), Redhawk (stainless), SR-1911 (stainless) and, of course, 10/22 (stainless-- notice a trend?). Give me this pistol with it's stainless internals, add a matte stainless slide, option for a manual safety, the ability and factory training materials to detail strip it (which Ruger is loathe to do), AND if I can shoot it well, it would happily replace my Glocks.
Why would they? During the world wars pretty much every firearm company made 1911’s for the military. Some of the most popular are rare ones made by sewing machine companies and others that never produced firearms before too.
@@KennethReed-j8r "Why would they?" Because if a 1911-type pistol isn't a Colt it's a clone, obviously. "During the world wars pretty much every firearm company made 1911’s for the military." So? Those clones were authorized by Colt as part of the agreement Colt made with the US military. Colt retained exclusive rights to manufacture the commercial version (the Colt Government Model) while authorizing other companies to make them under military contract. Colt held all the patents (which have long since expired of course). Also, other than Colt, the only two gun companies that made (and delivered) USGI M1911s or M1911A1s were Ithaca and Remington UMC. Everyone else was either not a gun company or not a company at all. That's not exactly "pretty much every firearm company," is it? "Some of the most popular are rare ones made by sewing machine companies and others that never produced firearms before too." Only one sewing machine company made them (Singer; 500 of them).
Ruger stuff tends to get pretty cheap over time. You can find an LCP Max for $250 rather frequently and that's a $449 MSRP. Give it a year and I'm sure it will be getting into that ballpark.
@@NoodleMcGee yeah true. Drop shippers like Dahlonega will likely get into the ballpark at least, probably before too long though. They tend to be fine making a few bucks ($20-30) per sale and just doing large volume.
@NoodleMcGee That's right out the gates. As they pay off tooling and continue mass producing I bet it goes down. LCP Max was $449 MSRP and I somewhat regularly see the stainless model hitting $250
When I heard Ruger and Magpul were working together, I was really nust hoping for a Mini 14/30 PMAG, but this is pretty neat. My only concern is it seems Ruger only made the upper, and the finish on their slides is notoriously terrible, so hopefully they figured that out.
My thoughts exactly. Something like the Tapco Gen 2s, but Magpul. (Pmags can be modded to fit Minis, but I’ve never done this so I can’t vouch for the reliability of doing this Google it!)
It wouldn't surprise me if the corrected that feature with the Mini.It's another platform that needs to be brought up to speed.I especially hate the Mini 30 mags and their sharp edges and tendency to show freckling and corrosion in wet environments over time.Hogue corrected the stock long ago.
Yeah that's why I got the stainless version of the LCP Max. That has been great though. I have sweated all over that gun and have had it subjected to a lot of less than ideal conditions. I clean it probably twice a year and it basically looks like it did the day I bought it. I'm probably trading it in for a bodyguard 2.0 soon, but that's purely for the huge upgrade with ergonomics. The Max has been a great little gun.
@melissasmess2773 I got to mess with one in my LGS the other day and it's just a matter of scraping the cash together at this point. It's SO much better feeling in the hand.
I went to Ruger's website and did a deep dive into this pistol and found it to be exceptionally well specd out. Usually, Ruger polymer pistols are not rated as +P compatible, which was one of the concerns I had first viewing this pistol. I am happy to report that this collaboration has rendered a pistol that is NATO, US, SAAMI, and CIP capable to include factory manufactured +P ammunition. It does state that +P+ is off the table as it could result in damage, injury, and voiding of the warranty. The other thing that I was curious about was if grip modules were already in swing and if so how much were they. You can get them from magpul directly for under 40 bucks and are said to ship with 2 magazines and already loaded up with magazine release and springs. If that was not a typo it has to be one of the best bargains going for a grip module package ever. I am thoroughly impressed by what I have seen in the few review videos and by what I have been able to research on my own in the past two hours. One review demonstrated the trigger pull weight with a Lyman digital scale at consistent 3.5 lb. pulls which is a significant improvement over any stock Glock trigger and even some aftermarket upgraded models. For this I say good show Ruger. What I found to be even more amazing is that even with this being a Fire Control Insert chassis system, Glock gen 3 fire group components and aftermarket components are still compatible. That makes fine tuning the fire arm to your liking very accessible with already existing components on the market; again, big kudos to Magpul and Ruger for not making these Fire Control Inserts out of proprietary componentry. Now, if Magpul makes a 19x sizes grip frame for this system then the RXM will literally meet all the specifications that Glock did not meet for the military trials. I personally like the Glock 19x format and own a Tisas Gen 3 Duty because it is built on that format of the G19 4" barrel with the full G17 size grip. I just cannot get used to the Glock grip angle and this RXM fixes that issue. Now it may just be me but I have seen thousands of shooting videos of the Glock 19 models over the years and I would almost argue that the RXM shoots a bit flatter than a Glock. From the shooting videos I have seen it looks as though the RXM produces more of a push back recoil than a muzzle rise recoil impulse. If this is not a misperception it would be a very welcomed advancement to an already relatively flat shooting platform. Furthermore if that is the case then I hope that Ruger and Magpul will offer up different caliber configurations in the future such as 10mm, 40 s&w, and 45 acp. Maybe not so much 40 s&w as it is not a very hot commodity anymore, but 10mm and 45 acp are still popular. If this series of pistols grabs traction and works out it may very well be the epitome of the perfect Glock, as it is everything that a current Glock pistol should be innovatively. Wonder if there will be backstrap and side grip panel modularity in the future? If any American manufacturer can pull off such a feat and keep it affordable Magpul and Ruger could. Great to see more options coming to market and from well established and trusted manufacturers.
I will never understand the proliferation of Glock clones. It would make sense if Glocks were outrageously expensive. Fake Rolex's I can understand. Fake Glocks are just stupid.
The market exists solely because Glock hasn't followed with the industry and actually innovated in...15-20 years. Glock clones are designed to fix all the ancient Glock design issues.
@@oskar6661 I don't see any issues. Glocks are duty weapons. They're more tool than eye candy. Gucci Glocks aren't as reliable in my experience. I have 5 and one Glock clone. My PSA Dagger is ammo sensitive. It's relegated to range use. My Glocks go with me everywhere and I trust them with my life.
@@Giovanni-33The frame is a major issue for a lot of us. It’s not about looks. It’s the fact that the useless hump on the backstrap not only makes it point high if you’re used to shooting literally any other handgun, that hump also digs into the bone of my palm and is very uncomfortable. The undercut is poorly executed and causes “glock knuckle”. It’s also a $600 gun that should really be about $400. Glocks reliability isn’t really that special anymore as guns from HK, FN, S&W, Walther, CZ etc. have all been just as good or have caught up in reliability standards. The only thing Glock has going for it is aftermarket support and that’s where these clones are getting a piece. If this proves reliable like a Glock, this is literally a better Glock lol. That’s definitely a big IF though. Ruger isn’t a go to brand for me. I’m curious how many parts are Gen 3 compatible? If you could take the stripped chassis and frame and just build every single other part with Gen 3 genuine Glock parts that would be the perfect gun lol.
I am getting one. My first Polmer Carry gun was the Ruger SR9C. It was fantastic. Later I went to G19 and still carry a G19 but I am getting this new Ruger for sure 100%
Years ago, I took the position that Glock was the AK of handguns. Today, I realized that I was wrong. It's the AR of handguns. Everybody and their dog are making Glocks and Glock parts. And if you're not making Glocks and Glock parts, what are you even doing with your life?
Agree. Big boys like Ruger, Smith or so on they might need to consider bringing back some of their iconic firearms and modernize them. These days EVERYBODY is just clone/copying each other ever since Glock Gen 3 patent expired.
I don't think they could do it without undercutting Beretta 92s and CZ75s. If a P series isn't any cheaper whats the point when da/sas with more prestigeous Military Service history exist for the same money.
This will be a success, might be a bit pricy for a gen 3-like but it’s got lots of name brand recognition. And the only thing you can’t completely change on a Glock is the polymer grip, but imagine getting a steel or aluminum and the only way to do that is this. For the optic you can always get a plate or swap the slide completely
Never heard of this gun before today when I got an email from Bud's with this gun on sale for $399. Saw the frame was Magpul (love my Magpul 1911 grip panels) and had to learn more. Looks like a great alternative to a G-19.
This is James' review of the RXM. There are many like it but this one is the one we watched first. James is our best friend. He is our life. Without James, we are useless. Without us, James is useless.
@@SuspiciousGanymede are they? The website description describes them as "range mags" so I'm not shocked if they are put through rigorous testing, but are you saying that they are failing during normal use?
The Ruglock will sell well in the budget tier, and there are interesting opportunities with the serialized trigger frame. It's so much better than the American pistol.
6:25 finger on trigger guard…I find myself gravitating back to doing that after hearing not to do it. Is this a Jack Daniel approved grip modification? Great stuff as always, James. Died at the GT troll. 😂 Merry Christmas, my dude. 🎄
"I doubt PSA is going to suffer much selling their Glock clones… after all there are 43,000 housing communities in the United States, so PSA has a very wide customer base that has never seen $500 in one place at the same time." Ow, what a burn, I felt that.
My company has been holding these for the past few days waiting to tell everybody about them. They're not too uncomfortable, it does need to have a little more undercut underneath the trigger.
Just bought a blem PSA Dagger frame for $39.99 plus tax and shipping ($51 total) so it's going to be tough to beat that deal. We'll see how good the trigger is.
This is an idea I was hoping someone would make for about a year now. Glock mag/slide compatibility with any grip angle you want? This is a win win for the consumer
It makes a lot of sense for big names to offer cheaper glocks with good triggers. Even if there isnt other options for grips, buying two or three spare grips and painting some, or stippling one or cutting one down to a smaller size or doing any sort of DIY gives you options as well.
This looks like a lot of features for the price point as long as it has gen 3 Glock reliability. I particularly like the fact that the slide is direct milled and the grip angle and texture looks nice. I’m seeing them for 4 hundo currently.
If the trigger is decent it might actually be a good budget option. I was gona trash on it but after watching ill wait shoot it and see. Great video man thanks!
As a true M&P guy, I've become a big Shadow Systems fan in recent years. I like so much about SS, but they are at a mid-premium price point. I'm interested to see how this RXM does considering it seems to offer a lot of the same key features with a different flavor but at only slightly more than half the price of a SS MR920.
Bought mine for $399 plus tax. Hell yeah. First and ONLY ruger pistol and can’t wait to pop an optic in my gen 3 Glock clone with a roughly 3.5lb trigger. I am one happy fanboy.
@@brentmansfield1289 I did product testing for PSA, I've got a Dagger with about 13k rounds through it on my workbench. It's got all Glock OEM internals but the stock slide and frame, most of the PSA parts failed by 10k rounds. For the same price you can get a used glock 19 and not worry about the barrel rifling stripping out or striker tips breaking within 1000rds
@@SuspiciousGanymede I’ve always been hesitant to buy any used gun (unless it’s from someone I know) because how do I know that 10k rounds hasn’t already been shot through it? I see your point though and I have seen videos where the striker is prone to failing after a couple thousand rounds. I’ll buy Glock oem parts when/if they fail. Both are just range toys anyway
@@SuspiciousGanymedeidk someone telling me the parts on a 300 dollar gun lasted 10k rounds sounds pretty good. Toss in the fact that Glock oem parts are cheap and plentiful kinda helps too. I have owned Glocks and daggers and,while the Glock was nicer, particularly the barrel, I’ve never fallen in love with the design; it works but I feel it is overpriced given other reliable options.
I say this as someone who generally doesn't like Glocks (nothing wrong with them, just never really liked them that much) but who has a P320 where only the FCU is original and who is building a P365... if third parties start releasing grip modules, this thing is going to kill it.
Two manufacturers now using the Strike industries optics mounting system for optics. Even the slide on this one is simular. Purchased my Strike Ind. Slide around six years ago. They were ahead of the curve. This Ruger is a no brainer to be a purchase. They always are top notch for quality and price points.
If you go back and read the Congressional hearings, and look up the meetings he had with specific congressman, Bill Ruger sacrificed greater than 10 round magazines to save handguns from being banned in America during the assault weapons ban, I really feel ashamed for gun historians who do not talk about this
I would rather watch new gun reviews done by James. It’s silly but I trust his opinion more than others. Or maybe it’s because he’s a sarcastic dude and I enjoy that sort of humor. Carry on sir.
If the optics mount does leave a gap that is very concerning. The last pistol optics course I was at the instructor was talking about how every time they do a class they have an optic fail, and sure enough in our class there was one where the screws sheared off because the optic wasn't mounted tight to the cut and had a small gap front to back. If it has mounting pins in addition to the screws that may help, but the way Shadow Systems does it with the plastic spacers that may be an advantage. Hopefully Ruger decides they can sell the FCI on its own like Sig does. We already know Magpul is going to be selling different frames, this way we'd be able to "build" ourselves our own handgun by selecting an upper of our choice.
Haven’t felt the need for a new Glock since I bought the gen1 19 but I want this. Color matching to your outfits is great if you’re into that sort of thing but I’m looking for a replacement frame with a 1911 grip angle.
To date, I haven't seen a Gen 3 clone that's got my attention like this one. I started my "carry life" with a (then) brand new Ruger P95 & I've owned other excellent Rugers like my 2" Security Six, so I know they're stuff is quality. And then the fact that Magpul's involved... Very cool!
Please think about supporting us, fellas. We give away ~$2k in gift certs to Top Gun Supply and Blue Alpha EVERY month, plus access to the VIP only Discord where James and Hop make the occasional dreaded appearance:
www.subscribestar.com/tfbtv
Can you support my college career into Criminal Justice and Psychology?
Look forward to the 1000 round review of the RXM.
Had to leave a like after the trailer park joke 😉
Looks more like a Smith EZ which is a good thing minus that grip safety of course
Is the grip angle a bit more neutral than the real glock? Like i believe the psa grip angle is a little bit more of a normal angle than a real Glock?
“Like being impregnated by a gun tuber there is no guarantee of support for you…” that’s wild lol
Isn't that just a Garand statement to make? I can't put my Thumb on who he might be referencing 🤔
@@GriffXJ Nice.
Absolute Boss comment.
James Reeves disclaimer to women
Applies to me as well.
Magpul needs to make a PDW chassis with a folding pistol brace to drop the trigger module into. It would sell like crazy
I don't think PDW braces actually sell all that well. I have never seen a single one on this side of a sales counter.
Yea but they won't. Magpul rarely does anything consumers want.
Came here to say this
Now that you mention it, it would actually make a lot of sense if Magpul has been semi-intentionally delaying the launch of the FDP until after they had launched their in-house (ish) Glock FCU. B&T already released their BWC9 using a P320 chassis, so Magpul couldn’t just drop their own folding P320 abomination, but perhaps there’s some design benefits to using a chassis style FCU in a folding sub gun.
So a Flux Raider.
Ruger and Magpul have the chance here to dominate a small but growing market if they introduce a reasonably priced PDW style frame for this gun.
Hopefully we will see something from Flux in the near future.
GritGrips is the best clone frame out there, I’m not sure why they didn’t just work with them.
@@TAGriff5432 I assume it's because Magpul is already big enough to supply these in the tens of thousands needed for law enforcement agencies.
Brass Facts is that you?
@@c0c0asauce I agree, large company support matters.
Magpul: "Damn! We have all these aftermarket Glock magazines but they keep buying OEM magazines!"
Ruger: "Well, hello there sonny....would you like to make a few nickels?"
I don’t know who you’re referring too, but the magpul Glock mags are good too go.
I purchased 24 PMAG 15 GL9 magazine's and have been running the crap out of them for the past 5 years with 100% reliability and 0% breakage. I'm not a fan of this chassis and frame though.
@@alanmeyers3957 yeah i like them too. Never had a problem with them. Except they dont like steel case, but thats ok because i dont like steel case either.
PMAGS generally outsells the OEM in stores. And a lot of the PCCs, AR9’s and Glock clones come with PMAGS in the box.
They didn’t need help selling mags.
I’ve never had an issue with pmags either. The only real (valid) complaint I have about Glocks is that mags tend not to drop out without a flick of the wrist to get it moving.
Everyone taking shots at Garand Thumb lmao
Yea what's that drama about?
@@relevation0he cheated on his second with with online heaux and was trying to sell his semen 😂😂😂
@relevation0 GT cheating on his wife. Trying to breed everything with 2 sets of lips.
@@relevation0 Cheated on his wife, married again, cheated on her, cheated on his mistress with a side piece. Women just throw themselves at him and he cant control himself.
@@RAWBOT301Dude, that's fucked. Both literally and figuratively. Lol
"This is the first time we've seen a Glock clone from a large established manufacturer"
S&W Sigma: "Am I a joke to you?"
No, but you are a lawsuit.
And the Dagger
And the Springfield Echelon. The Echelon is essentially a gen 3 Glock clone with a chassis system... The same as this. I'm a big fan of Magpul, though, so I'd probably like the Ruger better... If I didn't dislike the Glock grip angle.
I didn't buy another plastic S&W for almost thirty 30 after that POS Sigma from the 90's.
@@zues287this beats the echelon simply because it accepts Glock mags
Magpul is already showing the grip frame for sale. Looks like for a couple twenty dollar bills you can get a different color. Only black and stealth grey are on the website now.
Not only does James steal his little sister's shirts, he has the balls to steal her shorts. Much respect. Now... what's this little pistol we have here?...
😂
Now give it to Hop so he can tell us it will never be as good as his Rugar SR9
He ain’t wrong . SR series are gems
hop should have gotten this gun first and not queer reeves
That shot at Garand Thumb was bold as hell
I LOL'd.
I'd like to see an arm wrestling match between James and Mike. I know where my money is. Because ones a based Chad and the other wears girls clothes and sits to pee.
The shade thrown was elegantly executed.
Glock makes a glock clone. It's gonna be called the gen 6.
until the gen 7 vomes out. but i hear the gen 9s are gonna be awesome.
"Perfection"
The Gen 6 is already out, it's called the M&P 2.0.
Apparently the gen 485769 is going to be exactly the same as the gen 3, but with no trigger group. I cannot wait to spend more than the firearm on mods.
@@BlackRifleBear I’m a Canik fanboy, but S&W knocked the 2.0 series out of the park. I’ve had a couple and really liked them. Excellent quality at a far more reasonable price than the higher end stuff.
Ruger’s naming conventions for guns needs an overhaul. I hope Magpul embraces accessories, lots of possibilities.
Still waiting on the Hard R
Just thinking of magpul making frames for it and pdw chasis excites me, they will be well made and in stock lol and obtainable
This looks so generic it should just be called the Ruger "Gun-3"
@@lexwaldez Introducing Ruger’s new firearm, the Ruger Gun!
Ruglork
4:41
Don't impregnate me bro
You are the first (and only so far) person to review this pistol. Good job being first to the table. 👍👍
Smart to collaborate with Magpul. Ruger has a good rep, but Magpul gives it some “professional user” cred I imagine
Ruger has always been a solid company and always made great products for the price. It's only the young newbies that think ruger has little credibility. In my opinion NOBODY under 25 has any credibility.
Love the garand thumb reference. I noticed he's still got his tattoo wedding ring on.
What happened to GT?
@@dubvc1getting a divorce unfortunately
@@Butch.Ernesta They are all 304s if you are dum enough to get married. You brought it on yourself
It's a tattoo 😂
@@Butch.Ernesta tends to happen when you cheat
400 bones? ✔️
Glock Magazine? ✔️
Glock Holster? ✔️
I'm in.
Don't forget no stupid plate required for multiple optics options. For Glock, without a plate, you can only get Holosun SDS. And to be honest, quality of CHPWS went down rapidly as they are using chinesium made screws which like to broke after 2-4 thousands of rounds. So CHPWS is no longer an option
It's an amalgamation of the last 25 years of striker fired pistols with Magpul support right from the start. Seems well thought out. With the right execution they could take a nice chunk of the Glock clone market and maybe Sig as well.
$399 and maybe it would have my interest
GEISLER DEFENCE looks way better and cheaper and you can just pick your own slide for 200 and buy a 30 dollar flat trigger and trigger bar etc. all for $280
That's the price at Rural King today
yes $500 is too much
$499 MSRP means it'll be $399 within a year unless something crazy happens.
Ruger stuff tends to get pretty cheap when the hype wears off. Heck you can often get an LCP Max for $250 and the MSRP for that was $449. And that was easily the best pocket pistol on the market until the Bodyguard 2.0 came out.
MSRP.
It’ll be $350-$375. That should still be inexpensive enough for everyone.
It's the Glonk R320.
Yeah but this one doesn’t put your femoral in danger
Gluger
@@stevejames9510the Gronk
It’s a Rock
Ruglock American 320
Sure, Magpul will do this but they wont make PMAGs for the mini-14…
Agreed!!!! Probably a ruger issue though. Either way, make it happen for us.
A Magpul 'TAPCO gen 2'!!!
Ruger should change the Mini-14, and allow it to accept stanag mags. It's ridiculous that they keep it proprietary.
@@My-Name-Isnt-Important my thoughts exactly, dude. I think Ruger would sell way more rifles if it took stanag mags. If Ruger doesn’t wanna put the engineering/development investment in to make that work, I’d accept mini-14 PMAG’s as an viable substitute…assuming they’d cost less than the ridiculous $42/ea that Ruger sells their mags for.
I’ve never been a big fan of Ruger’s centerfire pistols. The American series, SR series and P series never really impressed me. I’m glad Ruger is doing something different by doing something plain.
You forgot the Ruger SR1911. I have a couple of them and they are very nice and work well.
My American compact seems indestructible, but it's a 3" barrel and 12 round default capacity and still manages to weigh 7 ounces more than my P99.
It feels fine in the hand, balance is nice, grip shape and master grip interface are nice, the fat, blocky shape calls up associations with my USP, but I'm not a fan of the position of the safety. The slide lock does not reliably engage, and will not engage at all with two of my four magazines. When I got the gun, there was drill kerf inside the striker channel causing intermittent light strikes. Like one out of three rounds or worse just wouldn't fire. I fixed that by disassembling the slide and cleaning it by flushing it with contact cleaner and then compressed air. I attempted to fix the slide lock issue by disassembling the frame to remove the slide lock lever for adjustment, but to my dismay, Ruger says it requires special tools not available to the consumer for reassembly. THey helpfully offered to fix it and then have a look at the slide lock issue. They said they were unable to duplicate the problem though. Still, cost me nothing.
Like the USP, it's overweight, under capacity, probably indestructible, but suffering weight penalties as a result.
I've been trying to re-sell it to buy more mags and a proper tritium sight set for my P99, but nobody seems to want to buy it.
I have a real love/hate thing with Ruger's pistols. My P89 is something I had always wanted to own, it's fun to shoot. It's also like carrying an ingot of lead on my belt. Security-9 is a nice gun to shoot and carry, but the slide finish is sub par and it just feels a bit cheap. Ruger has done a good job of positioning itself as the common man's, Ford F-150 type, gun maker. But almost too good a job-- they're leaning a little too much into the lower end, in my opinion, and risk coming off as cheap brand-- which I do not want to see happen. I own many Rugers. I'm a Ruger fan-boy. I love my Blackhawk, Mini-14 (stainless), Redhawk (stainless), SR-1911 (stainless) and, of course, 10/22 (stainless-- notice a trend?). Give me this pistol with it's stainless internals, add a matte stainless slide, option for a manual safety, the ability and factory training materials to detail strip it (which Ruger is loathe to do), AND if I can shoot it well, it would happily replace my Glocks.
P series is chunky and a leaves a little to be desired in terms of trigger...but they are tanks that shoot well forever
The mark 4 standard bro thats a really nice ass .22lr frankly. Its really like one of the .22lr of all time.
I wonder if there are still people calling 1911s clones if they are not colts?
there is still an entire genre of videogames called "rogue-likes"
rogue was released in the early 1980s
Why would they? During the world wars pretty much every firearm company made 1911’s for the military. Some of the most popular are rare ones made by sewing machine companies and others that never produced firearms before too.
@KennethReed-j8r just kidding. I guess, for you, I should have said ARs.
@@KennethReed-j8r "Why would they?"
Because if a 1911-type pistol isn't a Colt it's a clone, obviously.
"During the world wars pretty much every firearm company made 1911’s for the military."
So? Those clones were authorized by Colt as part of the agreement Colt made with the US military. Colt retained exclusive rights to manufacture the commercial version (the Colt Government Model) while authorizing other companies to make them under military contract. Colt held all the patents (which have long since expired of course).
Also, other than Colt, the only two gun companies that made (and delivered) USGI M1911s or M1911A1s were Ithaca and Remington UMC. Everyone else was either not a gun company or not a company at all. That's not exactly "pretty much every firearm company," is it?
"Some of the most popular are rare ones made by sewing machine companies and others that never produced firearms before too."
Only one sewing machine company made them (Singer; 500 of them).
@@MaximRecoil I meant to say “why would they not”
43,000 "mobile homes" 🤣🤣🤣 If these street price at $300-$350ish I'm down for one.
Ruger stuff tends to get pretty cheap over time. You can find an LCP Max for $250 rather frequently and that's a $449 MSRP.
Give it a year and I'm sure it will be getting into that ballpark.
It’s dropping at $399 street price so it’ll probably drop into that range before too long.
I've heard from a dealer that the wholesale price is $340 at the moment, so it'll probably be a minute before the street price drops
@@NoodleMcGee yeah true. Drop shippers like Dahlonega will likely get into the ballpark at least, probably before too long though. They tend to be fine making a few bucks ($20-30) per sale and just doing large volume.
@NoodleMcGee That's right out the gates. As they pay off tooling and continue mass producing I bet it goes down.
LCP Max was $449 MSRP and I somewhat regularly see the stainless model hitting $250
Cast slide and barrel?
Also the GT and trailer Park references had me dying
Ruger cold hammer forges their barrels
@ I know at least some of their guns had a cast barrel and there were some issues with them so I was hoping they dropped that
@@jsotelo5150 Which of their guns had that
@ SR9
That GT reference 🤣🤣🤣
I love the Garand Thumb stab 😂😂 so out of pocket, so necessary haha
Magpul is one of a few one of a few names I trust as much as Glock
When I heard Ruger and Magpul were working together, I was really nust hoping for a Mini 14/30 PMAG, but this is pretty neat. My only concern is it seems Ruger only made the upper, and the finish on their slides is notoriously terrible, so hopefully they figured that out.
My thoughts exactly. Something like the Tapco Gen 2s, but Magpul. (Pmags can be modded to fit Minis, but I’ve never done this so I can’t vouch for the reliability of doing this Google it!)
It wouldn't surprise me if the corrected that feature with the Mini.It's another platform that needs to be brought up to speed.I especially hate the Mini 30 mags and their sharp edges and tendency to show freckling and corrosion in wet environments over time.Hogue corrected the stock long ago.
Interesting. Im gonna gave to get the mini14 tactical at some point that gun is too cool man
I just pray the finish on the slide is much better than all of Ruger pistols
Yeah that's why I got the stainless version of the LCP Max. That has been great though. I have sweated all over that gun and have had it subjected to a lot of less than ideal conditions. I clean it probably twice a year and it basically looks like it did the day I bought it.
I'm probably trading it in for a bodyguard 2.0 soon, but that's purely for the huge upgrade with ergonomics. The Max has been a great little gun.
@@TheDarksideFNothing you'll never carry the LCP again after you buy the new Smith and Wesson 🤤
@melissasmess2773 I got to mess with one in my LGS the other day and it's just a matter of scraping the cash together at this point. It's SO much better feeling in the hand.
You gotta get them cerakoted. $80 - $100 is easily done when most of their pistols are less than $400 out the door.
Could do manganese phosphate as well.
Something about Ruger hopping on the "lets make a glock" train is beyond the pale...
Glock Killers to Glock Cloners.
Words of wisdom from Uncle Cletus.
You know what they say….if ya can’t beat em….😏
Shadow System is better than Glock
@@jammnefu4950 I should hope so, considering it's an upgraded gucci glock for $1,200.
I went to Ruger's website and did a deep dive into this pistol and found it to be exceptionally well specd out. Usually, Ruger polymer pistols are not rated as +P compatible, which was one of the concerns I had first viewing this pistol. I am happy to report that this collaboration has rendered a pistol that is NATO, US, SAAMI, and CIP capable to include factory manufactured +P ammunition. It does state that +P+ is off the table as it could result in damage, injury, and voiding of the warranty. The other thing that I was curious about was if grip modules were already in swing and if so how much were they. You can get them from magpul directly for under 40 bucks and are said to ship with 2 magazines and already loaded up with magazine release and springs. If that was not a typo it has to be one of the best bargains going for a grip module package ever.
I am thoroughly impressed by what I have seen in the few review videos and by what I have been able to research on my own in the past two hours. One review demonstrated the trigger pull weight with a Lyman digital scale at consistent 3.5 lb. pulls which is a significant improvement over any stock Glock trigger and even some aftermarket upgraded models. For this I say good show Ruger.
What I found to be even more amazing is that even with this being a Fire Control Insert chassis system, Glock gen 3 fire group components and aftermarket components are still compatible. That makes fine tuning the fire arm to your liking very accessible with already existing components on the market; again, big kudos to Magpul and Ruger for not making these Fire Control Inserts out of proprietary componentry.
Now, if Magpul makes a 19x sizes grip frame for this system then the RXM will literally meet all the specifications that Glock did not meet for the military trials. I personally like the Glock 19x format and own a Tisas Gen 3 Duty because it is built on that format of the G19 4" barrel with the full G17 size grip. I just cannot get used to the Glock grip angle and this RXM fixes that issue.
Now it may just be me but I have seen thousands of shooting videos of the Glock 19 models over the years and I would almost argue that the RXM shoots a bit flatter than a Glock. From the shooting videos I have seen it looks as though the RXM produces more of a push back recoil than a muzzle rise recoil impulse. If this is not a misperception it would be a very welcomed advancement to an already relatively flat shooting platform. Furthermore if that is the case then I hope that Ruger and Magpul will offer up different caliber configurations in the future such as 10mm, 40 s&w, and 45 acp. Maybe not so much 40 s&w as it is not a very hot commodity anymore, but 10mm and 45 acp are still popular. If this series of pistols grabs traction and works out it may very well be the epitome of the perfect Glock, as it is everything that a current Glock pistol should be innovatively. Wonder if there will be backstrap and side grip panel modularity in the future? If any American manufacturer can pull off such a feat and keep it affordable Magpul and Ruger could. Great to see more options coming to market and from well established and trusted manufacturers.
S&B range ammo is a personal favorite. Great review and spot on with the critique on color options.
With magpul making multiple frames, and even with a brace like a B&T usw.. could be a major hit!
Ain't no way 😂 4:40
Yeah way!
he did it, he really did it!
And I’m here for it 😂
YOOOOOOOOOOO
Too fucking good!
I will never understand the proliferation of Glock clones. It would make sense if Glocks were outrageously expensive. Fake Rolex's I can understand. Fake Glocks are just stupid.
The market exists solely because Glock hasn't followed with the industry and actually innovated in...15-20 years. Glock clones are designed to fix all the ancient Glock design issues.
@@oskar6661 I don't see any issues. Glocks are duty weapons. They're more tool than eye candy. Gucci Glocks aren't as reliable in my experience. I have 5 and one Glock clone. My PSA Dagger is ammo sensitive. It's relegated to range use. My Glocks go with me everywhere and I trust them with my life.
@@Giovanni-33The frame is a major issue for a lot of us. It’s not about looks. It’s the fact that the useless hump on the backstrap not only makes it point high if you’re used to shooting literally any other handgun, that hump also digs into the bone of my palm and is very uncomfortable. The undercut is poorly executed and causes “glock knuckle”. It’s also a $600 gun that should really be about $400. Glocks reliability isn’t really that special anymore as guns from HK, FN, S&W, Walther, CZ etc. have all been just as good or have caught up in reliability standards. The only thing Glock has going for it is aftermarket support and that’s where these clones are getting a piece. If this proves reliable like a Glock, this is literally a better Glock lol. That’s definitely a big IF though. Ruger isn’t a go to brand for me. I’m curious how many parts are Gen 3 compatible? If you could take the stripped chassis and frame and just build every single other part with Gen 3 genuine Glock parts that would be the perfect gun lol.
I am getting one. My first Polmer Carry gun was the Ruger SR9C. It was fantastic. Later I went to G19 and still carry a G19 but I am getting this new Ruger for sure 100%
Years ago, I took the position that Glock was the AK of handguns. Today, I realized that I was wrong. It's the AR of handguns. Everybody and their dog are making Glocks and Glock parts. And if you're not making Glocks and Glock parts, what are you even doing with your life?
“Like being impregnated by a guntuber there’s no guarantee of support in the future”
😭 Oh Damn we on topic
I'll pass. Ruger needs to bring back a much thinner and improve P- series of P- 90 and 95 hammered fired pistols.
don't forget the P97
I have a P-89 that works quite well. I love it.
A modern P89 would be cool
Agree. Big boys like Ruger, Smith or so on they might need to consider bringing back some of their iconic firearms and modernize them. These days EVERYBODY is just clone/copying each other ever since Glock Gen 3 patent expired.
I don't think they could do it without undercutting Beretta 92s and CZ75s. If a P series isn't any cheaper whats the point when da/sas with more prestigeous Military Service history exist for the same money.
I was just thinking 🤔 you know what we need ... another Glock clone 😅
😂😅😂😅😂
This will be a success, might be a bit pricy for a gen 3-like but it’s got lots of name brand recognition.
And the only thing you can’t completely change on a Glock is the polymer grip, but imagine getting a steel or aluminum and the only way to do that is this.
For the optic you can always get a plate or swap the slide completely
im surprised magpul hasnt come out with a p365 or p320 frame looks like its one step closer!
Magpul has announced a couple P320 frames, they just haven’t made it to stores yet
They have a P320 frame but don't get excited, it's hideous
The shot at garand thumb is wild
Yes, the guy that retired from "Air Force special operations " with zero deployments.
He's the living definition of a geardo
James for ATF director ❤
Why would you do that to James? It'd be worth it if he always wore tight shorts. I'm for it.
Now if only Ruger can make a finish that doesn't wear off and rust in 6 months.
Well, shit. Not a Ruger fan boy but this is something that I’d seriously consider if I were in the market for another Glock.
James, please tell Ruger and Magpul that we want a minimalistic drop in PDW chassis with a folding pistol brace. Similar to the flux raider
I am shocked no one had pointed out that it has a very similar shape to the P80
It's a glock clone.. they kind of all look like glock clones
Never heard of this gun before today when I got an email from Bud's with this gun on sale for $399. Saw the frame was Magpul (love my Magpul 1911 grip panels) and had to learn more. Looks like a great alternative to a G-19.
It blows my mind that Magpul still doesn’t sell grip modules for the MANY variants of the Sig P365…WTF?🤷♂️
This is James' review of the RXM. There are many like it but this one is the one we watched first. James is our best friend. He is our life. Without James, we are useless. Without us, James is useless.
We need a clear frame and magazine combo from magpul
Considering their TMAGs are already failing i doubt that's gonna happen. There are clear frames and mags though
@@SuspiciousGanymede e not heard about them failing, good to know since i have not bought one yet
No way, then they wouldn't show up on metal detectors!
@@Statusinator Ghost ninja assassin assault Glocks for days, man!
@@SuspiciousGanymede are they? The website description describes them as "range mags" so I'm not shocked if they are put through rigorous testing, but are you saying that they are failing during normal use?
The Ruglock will sell well in the budget tier, and there are interesting opportunities with the serialized trigger frame. It's so much better than the American pistol.
6:25 finger on trigger guard…I find myself gravitating back to doing that after hearing not to do it. Is this a Jack Daniel approved grip modification? Great stuff as always, James. Died at the GT troll. 😂 Merry Christmas, my dude. 🎄
Thats, incorrect, I've seen 500 dollars in a cash register before. Unfortunately I did not have my PSA with me at the time to take it for myself.
Used Glock 19 vs. New RXM = Used Camry vs. New Malibu. I’d go with the gently used G19 & Camry, but to each his own. Thanks for the review.
Comparing any firearms brand to a Chevy Malibu is pretty rough.
That's an interesting analogy. Can't argue with your logic
"I doubt PSA is going to suffer much selling their Glock clones… after all there are 43,000 housing communities in the United States, so PSA has a very wide customer base that has never seen $500 in one place at the same time." Ow, what a burn, I felt that.
I love that James has perfected the John Wick mag flick.
My company has been holding these for the past few days waiting to tell everybody about them. They're not too uncomfortable, it does need to have a little more undercut underneath the trigger.
Just bought a blem PSA Dagger frame for $39.99 plus tax and shipping ($51 total) so it's going to be tough to beat that deal. We'll see how good the trigger is.
Yeah but then there’s the $30 or so FFL fee to pick it up. At least in my area.
Psa dagger are junk
@@southmountain111and you base that observation on what? Never seen a negative review of the dagger. Careful your snobby fanboy is showing.
looks awesone, and anything Ruger and Magpul is good. Plus no stupid glock hump
Need RXF, Ruger and Flux defense
This is an idea I was hoping someone would make for about a year now. Glock mag/slide compatibility with any grip angle you want? This is a win win for the consumer
I like my psa daggers I probably wouldn’t be interested in the Ruger thanks for the review James
They have a very different feel. Closest thing I can think of is a compact CZ with finger grooves.
It makes a lot of sense for big names to offer cheaper glocks with good triggers. Even if there isnt other options for grips, buying two or three spare grips and painting some, or stippling one or cutting one down to a smaller size or doing any sort of DIY gives you options as well.
CZ P10C is a great glock clone also. 👍
Some would say it's better than a Glock
Bought mine before they had the OR models so for my Christmas present I'm getting the slide milled. Can't wait to get it back 👍
@@Paul_Colton_ I'd imagine most people would say that and they'd be right.
great **pistol.** not a clone
This looks like a lot of features for the price point as long as it has gen 3 Glock reliability. I particularly like the fact that the slide is direct milled and the grip angle and texture looks nice. I’m seeing them for 4 hundo currently.
Glock makes the Best Glocks.😁
True
Of everything on the planet that was not needed or wanted, another glockamole gun is one of those things. Bring back the SR9C, revised if anything!
This got me so excited that I bought an LE trade-in G19 instead, and now I'm fine...
Let me guess, it only had about 2,000 rounds or less? Needed oil? Lots of oil? The LE trade ins really are fantastic deals.
If the trigger is decent it might actually be a good budget option. I was gona trash on it but after watching ill wait shoot it and see. Great video man thanks!
Didn’t see this on my 2025 bingo card
The nice thing about the sig p320 is tons of places make grips and stuff. If this thing got half that support it will be great.
It’s new old gun day…… that’s what Glock clones are. Lol
And I love it! I wonder what the current numbers are on gen 3 Notaglock glock clones are out now.
As a true M&P guy, I've become a big Shadow Systems fan in recent years. I like so much about SS, but they are at a mid-premium price point. I'm interested to see how this RXM does considering it seems to offer a lot of the same key features with a different flavor but at only slightly more than half the price of a SS MR920.
Being an unfortunate Shadow Systems owner who got a genuine dud...I'd imagine Ruger has a stronger reliability record.
Ruger hasn't been Ruger since the 80s . And why buy a Glock clone when I can buy a Glock for 500 that's proven
Bought mine for $399 plus tax. Hell yeah. First and ONLY ruger pistol and can’t wait to pop an optic in my gen 3 Glock clone with a roughly 3.5lb trigger. I am one happy fanboy.
Looks like a PSA Dagger with a 1911 grip angle. Not spending more than $350 for one and wait a year for a gen2
This will be a lot better quality, how dare you compare magpul and ruger to that PSA garbage, which is what it is.
I have 2 daggers with around 2k rounds through each them with no hiccups. Why you such a hater?
@@brentmansfield1289 I did product testing for PSA, I've got a Dagger with about 13k rounds through it on my workbench. It's got all Glock OEM internals but the stock slide and frame, most of the PSA parts failed by 10k rounds.
For the same price you can get a used glock 19 and not worry about the barrel rifling stripping out or striker tips breaking within 1000rds
@@SuspiciousGanymede I’ve always been hesitant to buy any used gun (unless it’s from someone I know) because how do I know that 10k rounds hasn’t already been shot through it? I see your point though and I have seen videos where the striker is prone to failing after a couple thousand rounds. I’ll buy Glock oem parts when/if they fail. Both are just range toys anyway
@@SuspiciousGanymedeidk someone telling me the parts on a 300 dollar gun lasted 10k rounds sounds pretty good. Toss in the fact that Glock oem parts are cheap and plentiful kinda helps too. I have owned Glocks and daggers and,while the Glock was nicer, particularly the barrel, I’ve never fallen in love with the design; it works but I feel it is overpriced given other reliable options.
I say this as someone who generally doesn't like Glocks (nothing wrong with them, just never really liked them that much) but who has a P320 where only the FCU is original and who is building a P365... if third parties start releasing grip modules, this thing is going to kill it.
No thanks
As a dagger owner, that tangent on the owners of them not only hurt but was entirely correct
One thing companies should do is come up with better names. If they're copying from Glock designs, they should keep the number designation. Ruger 19.
Patent being expired does not mean trademark/copyright no longer applies to names.
@fragglerock15 So? A Ruger 19 is *NOT* a Glock 19. You can't copyright a number lmao
@@colby1398 Pretty sure Chanel has the number 5 trademarked. You won’t be seeing a Bath & Body Works No. 5 any time soon.
Two manufacturers now using the Strike industries optics mounting system for optics. Even the slide on this one is simular. Purchased my Strike Ind. Slide around six years ago. They were ahead of the curve.
This Ruger is a no brainer to be a purchase. They always are top notch for quality and price points.
Soooo I’m just gonna skip the extra step of buying a Glock and actually just buy a Glock
"PSA has a very wide customer base that has never seen $500 in one place at the same time", savage and true
Only bad part I can see is it's by "No honest man needs more than 10 rounds in any gun" Ruger.
If you go back and read the Congressional hearings, and look up the meetings he had with specific congressman, Bill Ruger sacrificed greater than 10 round magazines to save handguns from being banned in America during the assault weapons ban, I really feel ashamed for gun historians who do not talk about this
Bill Ruger died a fair while ago........
@@Hansengineering Bill’s gone, along with that mindset.
Bill Ruger died over two decades ago, they have obviously moved on.
I would rather watch new gun reviews done by James. It’s silly but I trust his opinion more than others. Or maybe it’s because he’s a sarcastic dude and I enjoy that sort of humor. Carry on sir.
Damn near thought Ruger stopped making handguns at this point. They don't be releasing shit
Leave it to James to call PSA trailer trash without actually calling PSA trailer trash. Brilliant.
If the optics mount does leave a gap that is very concerning. The last pistol optics course I was at the instructor was talking about how every time they do a class they have an optic fail, and sure enough in our class there was one where the screws sheared off because the optic wasn't mounted tight to the cut and had a small gap front to back. If it has mounting pins in addition to the screws that may help, but the way Shadow Systems does it with the plastic spacers that may be an advantage.
Hopefully Ruger decides they can sell the FCI on its own like Sig does. We already know Magpul is going to be selling different frames, this way we'd be able to "build" ourselves our own handgun by selecting an upper of our choice.
Interchangeable modules is smart for the people who want to be “artsy” with a soldering iron.
I do like how when James references the PSA for the Poors pistol, he uses footage of Hop holding it.
Magpul and Ruger are 2 of my favorite companies. I'll definitely be getting one soon.
Haven’t felt the need for a new Glock since I bought the gen1 19 but I want this. Color matching to your outfits is great if you’re into that sort of thing but I’m looking for a replacement frame with a 1911 grip angle.
I would buy this. Better texture, grip angle, iron sights, optic mounting, decent trigger, plus the fcu. Yeah I’m gonna get one
To date, I haven't seen a Gen 3 clone that's got my attention like this one.
I started my "carry life" with a (then) brand new Ruger P95 & I've owned other excellent Rugers like my 2" Security Six, so I know they're stuff is quality.
And then the fact that Magpul's involved... Very cool!