you've got to admire their reconstruction, even down to using the same knot, a green handled screwdriver and even making the same bullet pattern, that's some dedication
Biggest difference is definitely in character direction. Older version has a sense of bravado to him. Newer version he is a lot more sinister and mellowed out.
@@Dodo-wn4kh Real shit lol. People complaint about studio not making new original movie/series. Meanwhile when new movie/series released, it flopped despite a good review and everything
the old jackal wasnt surprised at all that a unique handmade weapon's accurracy is bad, he used to it, i dont know why they made it in remake like he never seen a weapon that needs correction before :D
I watched the 1973 movie many years ago as a kid and when I watched this scene in the series I admired the nod they were giving the original making it shot for shot identical as the adaption, and nature of the character is so completely different.
Look at how the pants and shirt fit him. How elegant is the scarf around his neck, his gait and movements. The original and the Chinese knockoff with a garish dummy with a gait like he took a shit in his underpants.
В старом фильме он выбрал дерево, которое не будет качаться, чтобы метко выстрелить. В новом фильме он выбрал случайное дерево, которое даже в кадре качается.
Fully agree. Good colour correction is when you don't notice it's there. Nowadays it's "Look at my "stylish" (insert favourite colour) colour correction!"😄 Different optics too. Original slightly softer (film vs digital I guess?) but more background in focus.
I guess not everyone is old enough to know the first movie. Its happened many times with me that I wasn't even aware that a movie or series was a remake.
@@cookiemonster9208 I guess there's an audience for remakes. I just think the original is still great and if the remake is attempting to copy it frame by frame it's a bit redundant.
Wow, a shot-for-shot remake? I guess I will watch this! Though based on this clip, I'm not quite sensing "ice-cold assassin" from Redmayne the way I do from Fox.
There's def a bit of ice cold to Redmayne's character but he's human too. I've never seen the movie so I can't say how it compares, but he's not untouchable, and I like that abt the show. Makes the ice cold even scarier, bc you see him act like a guy with emotions and then in a split second act like someone completely different when he's got a job to do. Well worth the watch, imo
Redmayne stayed true to the character's diagnosis, but being a TV Series reveals to us more of the motivations and the way he relates to others: Likely DSM-5 Diagnoses Based on expanded traits from a TV series: 1. Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD): The most likely diagnosis due to his disregard for others, deceit, and lack of remorse. 2. Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD): Possible secondary diagnosis if his grandiosity and self-belief are emphasized. 3. Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Traits: Likely co-occurring traits, given his meticulous nature.
@@johnneilson377 Thank you! .22 WMR Muzzle Velocity: ~1,875-2,200 fps Effective Range: 150 yards Trajectory: Flatter Trajectory Accuracy: Less accurate at long range Use: Varmint hunting, pest control, self-defense (limited)
@@JackSparrowTheCAPTAIN Why are replying to every comment? This show is easily top 5 best shows of 2024. You seem desperate to spread hate just because you don't like it. 🤣
From what I heard, it’s actually less durable. (7-8 shots before it becomes useless, though it makes sense considering the tighter security of today) Still, I like both.
Only time I've ever heard of Day of the Jackal was when Avon was yelling at Stringer, but watching this dude zero a scope on a loose rifle barrel with a crutch as a stock has me interested
не стоило ремейк делать в современном сеттинге, слишком много киношных условностей получается (например, все эти уловки с переодеванием и гримом для маскировки уже не работают, кругом камеры с распознованием лиц; ДНК анализ и многое другое)
Beautifully accurate tribute, but you just can tell how the rifle in the new one is nothing but a hollow prop, there is absolutely zero weight to it and the closeups just look bad, like a bunch of hardware store PVC piping and a 3D-printed box. The original rifle was fantastic because it was actually a real functioning firearm made for the film.
Put the old footage on the left and new footage on the right, we read Left to Right, even your title is 1973 vs 2024; yet you flipped the presentation.
I love the fact that they made the Eddie Redmayne ones without cigarette, and has more sinister demeanor. For it could imply he's more off a sociopath because sociopath are known to be sophisticated and DNA could be picked from cig butts.
The female character is there just for DEI. I don't understand how an MI6 agent can be obese, useless..... I'm glad she dies in episode 10 of the first season.
Не смотрела оригинал, поэтому мне сериал в целом понравился. Но по кадрам здесь кажется что картинка в оригинале гораздо лучше. Актер, локация, звук, даже цветокоррекция в оригинале выглядит выиграшнее. Я должна срочно посмотреть оригинал.
The female character is there just for DEI. I don't understand how an MI6 agent can be obese, useless..... I'm glad she dies in episode 10 of the first season.
Я смотрел оригинал 1973 года, самый лучший фильм. Остальное всё пародия. Старые фильмы более лучше, в них всё естественно и не принуждённо . И нет этой ненормальной политики, как сегодня.
Old version acting makes you believe he's a professional. Smooth crisp actions with pupose. New version looks like he's trying to figure out how to act... I miss the old movies with real actors and real stories...
Old acting looks theatrical and typically lacks the nuances and subtleties of real human expressions and actions. Although this film may be an exception, to believe that old acting is better is simply wrong.
That's because he was probably concentrating on the exact moves he had to make and (pure speculation here) a team of checkers nagging the director as to every tiny detail that needed to be copied. It's a pretty good job though, and a very flattering homage to the original.
why didn't he sight his gun while looking down the scope in either movie? Even looks like the 1973 dude has actually shot a gun a few times. If his shot registered on target I would think he would just adjust his scope using that bullet hole rather than look up and guess. Probably why it took so many shots I guess.
The whole film isn’t like this, right? I understand if a few scenes are like this, especially as the original is a classic, but if the whole things exactly the same I just don’t get why they made it?
I've never watched either of these, but the 1973 version just seems cooler and more enticing. The 2024 version seems pretty hollow and devoid of panache.
1:22 he looked more surprised.. the old jackal exactly knew whats happening :D why did they do it like this? hollywood literally do remakes worse on purpose 😛😛 so that u wont be disappointed in an old movie, gentle as a British 😎
What is there to admire, Hollywood can't come up with anything new/fresh, everything is a reboot or inspired by the original. I can't remember watching a movie in the theatre or even bothering to watch a Hollywood/Netflix/Amazon/Apple movie.
How sad is this😮😢 The filmmakers not even trying to create something. They only copy paste the original script😢 Don t spend money on the new version, they don t deserve it!!! Rather watch the old version!!! Maybe this will force the filmmakers to do something instead of only collect your cash -for nothing😢
![Weekend in Taipei | เร็วแรงทะลุไทเป - Official Trailer [ซับไทย]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TUEJsWUvFjI/mqdefault.jpg)
my take away from this is that smoking isn't cool any more
Not just that. The original actor has a charm to him even without it. This new one they wanted a more deranged look
@@JustSumGuy01 I rate the new series, I think Redmayne was a good choice
Smoking will always be cool
@@JustSumGuy01well a killer wouldnt exactly be the most cheerful character
He does smoke later on in the show, it looks cool ofc
you've got to admire their reconstruction, even down to using the same knot, a green handled screwdriver and even making the same bullet pattern, that's some dedication
but at the same time... what for?
@@theAristocrap fan service probably
even the number on the cardboard box!
@@HVG67 I missed that one, good eyes
it was done horrible orig is better actor choice made no sense idk
Biggest difference is definitely in character direction. Older version has a sense of bravado to him. Newer version he is a lot more sinister and mellowed out.
and to be fair, really boring
@@JackSparrowTheCAPTAIN horrible take.
Another remake… who cares, let’s try to make a NEW film, shall we??
@@peopleselbow2657 Hundreds of new films and tv come out all the time. Maybe try actually watching them instead of complaining about remakes.
@@Dodo-wn4kh Real shit lol. People complaint about studio not making new original movie/series. Meanwhile when new movie/series released, it flopped despite a good review and everything
The old version looks like the man know what hes doing, professional, while the new version is dark grim, sinister like
Damnn the smoking really makes it feel like more if a casual scene, Like this is just another day at work and he has done it 1000x
the old jackal wasnt surprised at all that a unique handmade weapon's accurracy is bad, he used to it, i dont know why they made it in remake like he never seen a weapon that needs correction before :D
I watched the 1973 movie many years ago as a kid and when I watched this scene in the series I admired the nod they were giving the original making it shot for shot identical as the adaption, and nature of the character is so completely different.
Nothing can beat the original
The only reason why the original is superior in this scene is the cig in his mouth the whole time. There's a charm to the original
In a real life scenario a cigarette is a giant bullseye on your head
@@oddish3022 Dude is just practicing.
Look at how the pants and shirt fit him. How elegant is the scarf around his neck, his gait and movements.
The original and the Chinese knockoff with a garish dummy with a gait like he took a shit in his underpants.
No.
Tal vez el actor de la película actual no fuma
Even kept the detail that he used his left eye to aim the last shot after having used the right to zero.
В старом фильме он выбрал дерево, которое не будет качаться, чтобы метко выстрелить. В новом фильме он выбрал случайное дерево, которое даже в кадре качается.
Old is gold
I didn’t even realize this was a remake when I watched it cool to see the resemblance
The characters are stunningly different. Amazing cut by cut
1973 color correction is absolutely mesmerasing
Fully agree. Good colour correction is when you don't notice it's there. Nowadays it's "Look at my "stylish" (insert favourite colour) colour correction!"😄 Different optics too. Original slightly softer (film vs digital I guess?) but more background in focus.
Why did this need to be redone?
It might not be necessary, but it's just simply cool isn't it?
I'd love to see more versions with different actors.
To sell it a second time
I guess not everyone is old enough to know the first movie. Its happened many times with me that I wasn't even aware that a movie or series was a remake.
The original is still the best.
@@cookiemonster9208 I guess there's an audience for remakes. I just think the original is still great and if the remake is attempting to copy it frame by frame it's a bit redundant.
The high-waisted pants from the 70's look so much better than today's low-rise pants.
I think the one in 1974 looks better.
It does look better. Especially because cameras back then were higher quality too/ higher level of resolution
Never seen a sniper aim through the sight with the other eye before.
Wow, a shot-for-shot remake? I guess I will watch this! Though based on this clip, I'm not quite sensing "ice-cold assassin" from Redmayne the way I do from Fox.
There's def a bit of ice cold to Redmayne's character but he's human too. I've never seen the movie so I can't say how it compares, but he's not untouchable, and I like that abt the show. Makes the ice cold even scarier, bc you see him act like a guy with emotions and then in a split second act like someone completely different when he's got a job to do. Well worth the watch, imo
no, only this scene
Redmayne has a psycho killer look to him
Redmayne stayed true to the character's diagnosis, but being a TV Series reveals to us more of the motivations and the way he relates to others:
Likely DSM-5 Diagnoses
Based on expanded traits from a TV series:
1. Antisocial Personality Disorder (APD): The most likely diagnosis due to his disregard for others, deceit, and lack of remorse.
2. Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD): Possible secondary diagnosis if his grandiosity and self-belief are emphasized.
3. Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Traits: Likely co-occurring traits, given his meticulous nature.
Much larger caliber of bullet in the 2024 version. What did they use in the 1973? That looks smaller than a .22?
.22 WMR
@@johnneilson377
Thank you!
.22 WMR
Muzzle Velocity: ~1,875-2,200 fps
Effective Range: 150 yards
Trajectory: Flatter Trajectory
Accuracy: Less accurate at long range
Use: Varmint hunting, pest control, self-defense (limited)
the remake on peacock is outstanding. cannot wait for season 2
Best zoom😂😂😂
73 VERSION STILL THE BEST
One of the best mini series of 2k24
lol, nope
@@JackSparrowTheCAPTAIN Why are replying to every comment? This show is easily top 5 best shows of 2024. You seem desperate to spread hate just because you don't like it. 🤣
No,
Yeah maybe, how many good series were there last year?
I like the OG 1973 gun, looks much, much sleeker. Though the 2024 looks more durable.
From what I heard, it’s actually less durable. (7-8 shots before it becomes useless, though it makes sense considering the tighter security of today) Still, I like both.
Only time I've ever heard of Day of the Jackal was when Avon was yelling at Stringer, but watching this dude zero a scope on a loose rifle barrel with a crutch as a stock has me interested
не стоило ремейк делать в современном сеттинге, слишком много киношных условностей получается (например, все эти уловки с переодеванием и гримом для маскировки уже не работают, кругом камеры с распознованием лиц; ДНК анализ и многое другое)
The series copies the old film throughout?
Nope, this was the only scene that they recreated shot for shot, a smart choice imo
İkisininde oyunculuğu takdire şayan. Mükemmel bir anma olmuş.
Beautifully accurate tribute, but you just can tell how the rifle in the new one is nothing but a hollow prop, there is absolutely zero weight to it and the closeups just look bad, like a bunch of hardware store PVC piping and a 3D-printed box.
The original rifle was fantastic because it was actually a real functioning firearm made for the film.
Thats because the new one is a specially made plastic rifle. Thats the whole point of the new one.
@@sheevpalpatine-grayson2456 Stop!
Im sure he'll look at his OSCAR and sleep very soundly
He did an incredible job
@@sheevpalpatine-grayson2456 People out here complaining without context is so funny to me lol
Так она и напечатана на 3D принтере.
Put the old footage on the left and new footage on the right, we read Left to Right, even your title is 1973 vs 2024; yet you flipped the presentation.
A mesma constituição da cena ....incrível
Amazing show
Yeah the lack of smoking completely ruins the aesthetic
Jack in 2024 has successfully quit smoking 😂
But he is now unable to shut one eye...
I love the fact that they made the Eddie Redmayne ones without cigarette, and has more sinister demeanor. For it could imply he's more off a sociopath because sociopath are known to be sophisticated and DNA could be picked from cig butts.
Movie is in 1963 , DNA tests were discovered in 1984. Him thinking about something like that is nonsense.
Awesome production!
Eddie Redmayne couldn't carry Edward Fox's jockstrap.
hey they used the same color screwdriver - what a rip!
What was really the point of this move do over? What did it really add onto the story?
so that's why they used a close up
Does the rifle have zero recoil, or is his eye made of steel?
0:48
Virgin "Jackal 2024" vs Chad "Jackal 1973"
Newt Scamander prepares to fight Grindelwald.
Excellent book, good films
I stopped watching the new one, I thought it stunk.
The original is a classic!!
Words cannot express how much I loved the new show.
The female character is there just for DEI. I don't understand how an MI6 agent can be obese, useless..... I'm glad she dies in episode 10 of the first season.
What is that gun he use? is it self made or that gun actually exist?
In 1973, smoking was classy, in 2024 smoking is a total shame 🤣
Не смотрела оригинал, поэтому мне сериал в целом понравился. Но по кадрам здесь кажется что картинка в оригинале гораздо лучше. Актер, локация, звук, даже цветокоррекция в оригинале выглядит выиграшнее. Я должна срочно посмотреть оригинал.
Yes. watch it! "The Day Of The Jackal" is one of the best movies ever!
Is this new series any good comparatively?
Its fantastic
it's really bad, boring 9/10
It has a fantastic attention to detail.
The female character is there just for DEI. I don't understand how an MI6 agent can be obese, useless..... I'm glad she dies in episode 10 of the first season.
Decent in parts, bit mediocre in others.
왼쪽이 24년도 리메이크인데 왜 제목은 반대로죠?
Я смотрел оригинал 1973 года, самый лучший фильм. Остальное всё пародия. Старые фильмы более лучше, в них всё естественно и не принуждённо . И нет этой ненормальной политики, как сегодня.
where is the cigarrete?
And the same location? 🙂
so thats why this scene is so familiar.
Old version acting makes you believe he's a professional. Smooth crisp actions with pupose. New version looks like he's trying to figure out how to act... I miss the old movies with real actors and real stories...
Old acting looks theatrical and typically lacks the nuances and subtleties of real human expressions and actions. Although this film may be an exception, to believe that old acting is better is simply wrong.
That's because he was probably concentrating on the exact moves he had to make and (pure speculation here) a team of checkers nagging the director as to every tiny detail that needed to be copied. It's a pretty good job though, and a very flattering homage to the original.
Dude, if they are gonna replicate it, shot for shot, why make a movie?
Muito Bom 👍🏻
Kinda doesnt make sense. He does know that he has to change up the zeroing again.
But the original is still there. What's the point of remaking it?
1973 guy has way more swag.
С Уиллисом правдоподобнее, получается)
То вообще другой фильм.
They eaven made the same bullet mark but they removed cigarette lol
I didnt know they 3D printed guns back int he 70s.
I think I've missed the point. Why did they do the same frame shots instead od their own?
Why on earth did they remake this movie?
INSANEEE
why didn't he sight his gun while looking down the scope in either movie? Even looks like the 1973 dude has actually shot a gun a few times. If his shot registered on target I would think he would just adjust his scope using that bullet hole rather than look up and guess. Probably why it took so many shots I guess.
only me, who cnt undestant for what remake this kind of films&&
Why dis dude always be having teary eyes
I know right . He looks like he is about to cry at any moment
Try whatever you want with your fancy camera, they never gonna capture that fred zinnemann aesthetic noir
eddie redmayne is classy
The whole film isn’t like this, right?
I understand if a few scenes are like this, especially as the original is a classic, but if the whole things exactly the same I just don’t get why they made it?
The rest is very different, but this scene is a nice reference to the older film for those who saw it.
The old version had a better-looking gun.
I've never watched either of these, but the 1973 version just seems cooler and more enticing. The 2024 version seems pretty hollow and devoid of panache.
i never understood the need to redo the same exact thing why just better the actual footage with modern technologie ???
lol that wimpy little action int he new one ain't hold that kind of pressure in.
Why to remake it? The movie already exists!
그래 자칼이면 이 장면 나와줘야 하는거지... ^^
Hollowood has run out of new ideas.
Up next, Gone With The Wind ‘25 starring Vince Vaughn as Rhett Buttler and Tina Fey as Scarlet O’Hara.
Remayne should be vaping in the new version! I know no one wants to hear it but if you’re gonna remake it then modernize it correctly!
He does smoke, but not in this scene.
Kelebihan karakter tentu lebih moderen tapi yg alami karakyer baru lebih keten tanpa merokok
this gun really exsist?
No
Defo cooler smoking than not.
총을 고정하는 나무가 2024년 버전은 너무 가늘어서 흔들거립니다. 저 얇은 나무에 고정하고 쏠거면, 차라리 그냥 쏘겠네요. 1973년 버전이 더 사실적입니다.
What's even the point of doing a remake if everything is almost the same but worse
I think they chose the wrong tree in the new one, you can see it swaying in the breeze. Where Mr Fox's is as stiff as his upper lip.
1:12 the original won
1:22 he looked more surprised.. the old jackal exactly knew whats happening :D why did they do it like this?
hollywood literally do remakes worse on purpose 😛😛 so that u wont be disappointed in an old movie, gentle as a British 😎
Like you buy a Chinese copy of a G-Wagon
What is there to admire, Hollywood can't come up with anything new/fresh, everything is a reboot or inspired by the original. I can't remember watching a movie in the theatre or even bothering to watch a Hollywood/Netflix/Amazon/Apple movie.
How sad is this😮😢
The filmmakers not even trying to create something.
They only copy paste the original script😢
Don t spend money on the new version, they don t deserve it!!! Rather watch the old version!!!
Maybe this will force the filmmakers to do something instead of only collect your cash -for nothing😢
Replace Eddie Redmayne with Paddington Bear.
So no smoking?
Did this film really need a remake...?
stop crying
No
Posh lads seem to find it easy to play violent psychopaths, no idea why. Let's hope the latter Edward doesn't end up a Kipper like the former.
Ah! Yes, the scene all the OG fans pointed fingers to annoying everyone around them!
И зачем нам это показали?
Side by side and title of the video are round the wrong way.
Do better