There’s a bunch of different RGW90 versions, what Ukraine got was RGW90 HH (HEAT/HESH) which is used against armored vehicles etc. There’s also an anti-structure version RGW90 ASM which is used against enemies behind walls or to create holes in walls for entry. RGW90 LRMP (long range multipurpose) is used against infantry or unarmored vehicles, apart from a direct fire mode it can also be used in an air burst mode at up to a range of 1200 meters. It has a fragmentation warhead with tungsten balls. There’s also an illumination version and a smoke version. In the final stages of development is a RGW90 HH-T version which has a tandem HEAT warhead and is thus more useful against enemy main battle tanks with ERA.
NLAWs and Javelins get the majority of attention by people. But I’ve seen hundreds of combat footage from Ukrainians who have used MATADORS and the classic RPG-7s more often. Too often only certain weapons are celebrated by the media and casual onlookers… HIMARS, NLAWs, Javelins, Stringers, etc. But if you pay attention, other systems are more widely used and equally efficient. Such as… RPG-7s, Ukrainian made Stugna-Ps, M270 MLRS, etc.
True. Everyone's talking about the American Patriot anti-air systems, but the German IRIS-T (especially with Hensoldt radar) is 99,9% effective (Kinzhal included) until now.
Why do all of the animations show a flame coming out of the back upon firing, when literally the entire point of the RGW is that there is no flame out the back, because the hot gasses are trapped in the sealed internal chamber?
Matadors were developed by Germany, Israel and Singapore. So, Germany doesn’t need Israeli permission. Unlike, nations with F-16s need US approval to donate. Now, the Israeli Spike ATGM was solely developed by Israel and that’s why Ukraine doesn’t have any. Why donated Swedish CV90 IFVs doesn’t have Spike ATGMs.
"How RGW 90 (Matador) is Helping Ukraine's War Effort? [sic]" -- if you want to frame that as a question, write "How is the RGW 90 (Matador) Helping Ukraine's War Effort?", but you could simply omit the question mark.
There’s a bunch of different RGW90 versions, what Ukraine got was RGW90 HH (HEAT/HESH) which is used against armored vehicles etc.
There’s also an anti-structure version RGW90 ASM which is used against enemies behind walls or to create holes in walls for entry.
RGW90 LRMP (long range multipurpose) is used against infantry or unarmored vehicles, apart from a direct fire mode it can also be used in an air burst mode at up to a range of 1200 meters. It has a fragmentation warhead with tungsten balls.
There’s also an illumination version and a smoke version.
In the final stages of development is a RGW90 HH-T version which has a tandem HEAT warhead and is thus more useful against enemy main battle tanks with ERA.
NLAWs and Javelins get the majority of attention by people. But I’ve seen hundreds of combat footage from Ukrainians who have used MATADORS and the classic RPG-7s more often. Too often only certain weapons are celebrated by the media and casual onlookers…
HIMARS, NLAWs, Javelins, Stringers, etc.
But if you pay attention, other systems are more widely used and equally efficient. Such as… RPG-7s, Ukrainian made Stugna-Ps, M270 MLRS, etc.
Also AT4 and panzerfaust 3
True. Everyone's talking about the American Patriot anti-air systems, but the German IRIS-T (especially with Hensoldt radar) is 99,9% effective (Kinzhal included) until now.
God 💪 Bless 👊 Ukraine 🇺🇦
Precursor charge is already on its way / already tested.
Why do all of the animations show a flame coming out of the back upon firing, when literally the entire point of the RGW is that there is no flame out the back, because the hot gasses are trapped in the sealed internal chamber?
because the first thing we need to check before firing is "back blast clear"
0:58 he missed.
I didn't know that this anti-tank weapon was being used by the Ukraine military because Israel wasn't wanting to send them any weapons.
Germany sent them not Israel. But probably they had to ask Singapore and Israel before they were sent.
Matadors were developed by Germany, Israel and Singapore. So, Germany doesn’t need Israeli permission. Unlike, nations with F-16s need US approval to donate.
Now, the Israeli Spike ATGM was solely developed by Israel and that’s why Ukraine doesn’t have any. Why donated Swedish CV90 IFVs doesn’t have Spike ATGMs.
@@TheBongReyes nah the German company that worked with Israel is owned by Israel lol
German company Dynamit Nobel Defence (DND), a subsidiary of Israeli Rafael
Welcome to Croatia...❤❤❤
Not a rocket launcher. It doesn’t launch a rocket. It propels a grenade
Very interesting thank you
"How RGW 90 (Matador) is Helping Ukraine's War Effort? [sic]" -- if you want to frame that as a question, write "How is the RGW 90 (Matador) Helping Ukraine's War Effort?", but you could simply omit the question mark.
Polish police is very fond of this weapon system! 😂
0:37 panzerfaust 3
Mariupol?
3152 Ullrich Forge
Marvin Trafficway
Croatia is buying 👌🏻🇭🇷
❤❤❤❤
Stoltenberg Valleys
Casimer Road
236 Adriel Point
9279 German Passage
Carroll Ranch
Schmitt Court
Duncan Mountains
Lehner Center
Taylor Paul Smith Joseph Brown Thomas
Fisher Ranch
#ruSSiaparasha .
Glory to Ukraine, Glory to Ukrainians, Glory to all Civilized Countries!
P.S. ruSSia will crumble in near future!!!
Glory to the Nazis/Banderites in Ukraine? Ukraine lost the war
@@uwekonnigsstaddt524Glory to the Wagner Nazis? One people, one realm, one leader. Heil Putin! _🤚🏻🤡_
Hills Centers
one year after we can say NO. it's not helping that much.
Hammes Rapid
Lind Mills
Hammes Groves
Paris Points
Bofors
No, Dynamit Nobel Defence
helping? you mean helping to obliterate that country? or helping the weapons manufacturer to make a lot of money?
We're discussing the RGW 90's strategic use in combat, not endorsing any particular viewpoint or outcome.
Helping, defending against the russian Invasion!!
hey look, a surrender monkey !
They are being invaded, then who is destroying the ukraine? US? The west? No its Russia
7549 Maurice Creek
93551 Wilderman Avenue
61820 Heather Inlet
8574 Pedro Brook