BATTLE OF THE NEGATIVES!! - Stearn vs D'Alembert Betting Systems

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2020
  • Stearn vs Flat: • NEW BETTING STRATEGY R...
    We testing out two negative progression systems. Two modified martingale systems!
    If you aren't familiar with the Stearn Betting System. Here is how it work:
    There are 9 levels. With each loss you proceed to the next level. Each level has its own betting unit:
    - If you win one hand, you are to stack that bet and go for a 2nd win.
    - If you lose the 2nd hand, continue through the levels.
    - If you win the 2nd hand, you start back at level 1!
    - In order to start back at level 1, you must first win 2 hands in a row.
    - Levels are below:
    Level 1-3: Bet 1 unit
    Level 4-5: Bet 2 units
    Level 6-7: Bet 4 units
    Level 8-9: Bet 8 units
    #blackjack #casino #lasvegas
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 10

  • @pewing99
    @pewing99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I want to see the Battle of the D'Alemberts. Positive (reverse) vs Negative (standard). I haven't decided which I like better myself.

  • @andrewmathews3911
    @andrewmathews3911 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I would like to see the d'alembert against the reverse Fibonacci

  • @pewing99
    @pewing99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I went back and recorded all the results playing this with Reverse D'Alembert which is the positive progression version and it just killed this shoe but you are basically playing most of the shoe in the Black Action mode which is a clench the butt-cheeks level for me. From around hand 21 on you were at $100+ bets with just a couple dips to $90. High base bet was $140 which was a loss. Highest bet was a double on $120 (the double on nine) which won $240 giving the highest running total of the show at $1330. it was downhill from there ending in $1060 for a $560 profit on the shoe. Personally I would have walked after winning that first Black Chip bet which put me at $1040 which is my walking point (doubling buy-in). That would have been about mid shoe. This shoe was so win heavy though any positive progression would have been out there. There was only two points you would have been losing and it was only at $490 both times.

    • @thedoubledownroom5614
      @thedoubledownroom5614  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah walking away after a certain profit is way smarter than playing all the way through an entire shoe!

  • @burakyldrm1738
    @burakyldrm1738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If we lose the first 4 bets and win the 5th one, I mean the second 2 unit bet, what should be the 6th bet? 2 units or 4 units?

  • @ronknowles8865
    @ronknowles8865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was a great shoe my friend, I usually get up once I've reached $100 depends on by in

    • @eastcalican
      @eastcalican 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Went to the casino today and played the D'Alembert system and made $100 within my first like 8 hands lol Too Easy!! Do you usually play the stern system when you play?

  • @90BeastMode90
    @90BeastMode90 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a way to combine these? These are my two favorite systems and I’d love to see a “super system” If possible

  • @bi3839
    @bi3839 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great shoe !!

  • @thaohuynh3930
    @thaohuynh3930 ปีที่แล้ว

    U didn't parlay for the Stearn a fewv hands during a long run.