Just a videogame pet. It was actually a fantastic battle for both sides and pretty even, you call it Pathetic because you lost and that sucks for you but you should enjoy the intrigue and scenarios that we chance upon ingame, instead of coming from it from a win at all costs perspective.
@@fragfmgill "Just a game" argument is pathetic and from my perspective it's a siege, we all want to have fun in some way and when you are sieging someone and getting fucked by 3 clan in the back that forces on you to push on bad terms it just ruins it for one side even tho it might look fun for the others... Also the relation beetwen VD and HOST is just toxic for the rest of the server because you can't just have content without making sure you can defend from them both helping the other one in every single scenario you could possibly think of. Some people want to just log in after work, go to siege and log off, they don't need cancer allying. I'm sure HOST's even tho they were 35 at peek dont mind getting sieged because we all know defending is quite fun activity but when people like VD and BRE just backstab it ruins the fun and brings cancer to the game...
@@adanos2982 If i recall correctly didn't Poland hire Lost mercs on the first or second siege attempt as to why Host tried to hire mercs to counter them for a total of 100+ guys on the offense, Also BD and Poland came to siege the second time around and won then.
Also the first part of the video seems to be from the BD point of view during the second assault where host tried to hire mercs to even out the 75 vs 30 and lost the defence, And the VD point of view was during the first assault where host was defending against 100+vs 35 where VD and BRE barely won the defence for Host.
@@lordcarson7796 No, basicly it was Pols and BD's 30+30 but then BD's started to loggin more and moire and they finally got 45 people but you cant just tell people nah we cancel the siege and as far as we were ltierally expecting VD's to backstab, we didnt know BRE and MERC will join the siege too... And at no point we had merc at first attempt, it was pure 2v1 siege with 90% chance of VD coming to help but BRE + MERC (around 45-50 men) was too much
why these videos for epic big multiplayer battles show t he most epic edition showing little lore and all but when they show some of the gameplay on the ground its a bunch of people screaming on the worst mic quality you heard in your life
Herishey's POV: th-cam.com/video/RwaA4s57jtU/w-d-xo.html
Very great and accurate retelling love it I wish we could've done more as mercenaries, but time will tell I guess
I mean 75vs30 seems like gank but like Pols and BD's knew VD would backstab it yet they had to call for mercenaries and BRE on top of that... Pathetic
Just a videogame pet. It was actually a fantastic battle for both sides and pretty even, you call it Pathetic because you lost and that sucks for you but you should enjoy the intrigue and scenarios that we chance upon ingame, instead of coming from it from a win at all costs perspective.
@@fragfmgill "Just a game" argument is pathetic and from my perspective it's a siege, we all want to have fun in some way and when you are sieging someone and getting fucked by 3 clan in the back that forces on you to push on bad terms it just ruins it for one side even tho it might look fun for the others...
Also the relation beetwen VD and HOST is just toxic for the rest of the server because you can't just have content without making sure you can defend from them both helping the other one in every single scenario you could possibly think of. Some people want to just log in after work, go to siege and log off, they don't need cancer allying. I'm sure HOST's even tho they were 35 at peek dont mind getting sieged because we all know defending is quite fun activity but when people like VD and BRE just backstab it ruins the fun and brings cancer to the game...
@@adanos2982 If i recall correctly didn't Poland hire Lost mercs on the first or second siege attempt as to why Host tried to hire mercs to counter them for a total of 100+ guys on the offense, Also BD and Poland came to siege the second time around and won then.
Also the first part of the video seems to be from the BD point of view during the second assault where host tried to hire mercs to even out the 75 vs 30 and lost the defence, And the VD point of view was during the first assault where host was defending against 100+vs 35 where VD and BRE barely won the defence for Host.
@@lordcarson7796 No, basicly it was Pols and BD's 30+30 but then BD's started to loggin more and moire and they finally got 45 people but you cant just tell people nah we cancel the siege and as far as we were ltierally expecting VD's to backstab, we didnt know BRE and MERC will join the siege too...
And at no point we had merc at first attempt, it was pure 2v1 siege with 90% chance of VD coming to help but BRE + MERC (around 45-50 men) was too much
Dogs as always WP at least by ganking you can win XD
4.10 XD
why these videos for epic big multiplayer battles show t he most epic edition showing little lore and all but when they show some of the gameplay on the ground its a bunch of people screaming on the worst mic quality you heard in your life
worst mics are the funniest mate, welcome to bannerlord multiplayer
The term Backstab is daft.
How so?