Goods market equilibrium

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @Giray-og1kj
    @Giray-og1kj 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your explanation is so simple and clear, ı understand more in here than my class. Thanks !

  • @MrTugwit
    @MrTugwit 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Department of Economics, the Keynesian "multipliers" are for spending increments.
    Increment variables have deltas, for instance ΔY, ΔCo, ΔT, ΔI, ΔG.
    At about 9:40, you show a "multiplier" equation with baseline variables:
    Y = (1/(1-c1)) (Co -c1T + I + G)
    You can't increment anything in (Co -c1T + I + G)
    because that would be illegal addition or subtraction
    before parentheses and multiplication.
    This is the multiplier equation for increments:
    ΔY = (1/(1-c1)) (ΔCo -c1ΔT + ΔI + ΔG)
    0 = (1/(1-c1)) (0 -c1(0) + 0 + 0 ) [Start at delta zero]
    0 = 0 - 0 + 0 + 0 [Multiply]
    2 = 1 - 1 + 1 + 1 [Add and subtract]
    P-E-MD-AS says there's no multiplier
    because you must multiply BEFORE adding and subtracting.

  • @CATLAZILY
    @CATLAZILY 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Your explanation is so simple and clear! Thanks a lot! The electronic highlighter and the hand writing is also fascinating. Do you mind to share what kind of program you are using for this video?

  • @teamorganics6688
    @teamorganics6688 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    please explain mathematically how you get (1-c1)Y. In more detail, my math is rusty

  • @samlaf92
    @samlaf92 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:13 Why don't we also have the financial markets (financial investments) and overseas markets (exports)?

    • @loosenup8152
      @loosenup8152 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Closed economy so IM and EX=0

  • @astroxin
    @astroxin 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think he's assuming this is a closed economy so NX is assumed = 0?

    • @TreBlass
      @TreBlass 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Connor Jung yeah.. 7:04

  • @Theseparo2
    @Theseparo2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for clearing the graph up. Keep up the good work.

  • @VanNguyen-mz5kd
    @VanNguyen-mz5kd 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I thought the aggregate demand should also include net export?

    • @TreBlass
      @TreBlass 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Van Nguyen It should be a closed economy

    • @TreBlass
      @TreBlass 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Van Nguyen 7:06..he said that

  • @actopzz5989
    @actopzz5989 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a question regarding the use of variables. Y is income but Y is also GDP, determine by C+I+G+(X-M). Now the other variable on the graph is Z, total demand in a country, ask AD, which also has the same formula has GDP. How does one graph have two variables on each axis which are calculated in the same way? Ty

  • @muhammadramzikhairunnas1021
    @muhammadramzikhairunnas1021 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!!

  • @MrTugwit
    @MrTugwit 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Department of Economics, your video is NONSENSE.
    At about 5:55, you have this equation:
    Z = Co + c1(Y-T) + I + G
    And you say the endogenous part of demand is c1 times Y:
    c1Y
    At about 6:09 you say:
    "If aggregate income rises by a dollar
    aggregate demand will rise by a fraction of that, c1."
    That's complete, and obvious, nonsense.
    You can't increase the value of Y in the equation
    Z = Co + c1(Y-T) + I + G
    because that would be ILLEGAL addition to Y
    before parentheses: (Y-T)
    and before multiplication of (Y-T) by c1.
    Considering just your expression c1Y,
    increasing the value of Y by $1
    would be ILLEGAL addition to Y
    before multiplication of Y by c1.
    P-E-MD-AS (from GRADE SCHOOL)
    shows that parentheses and multiplication
    come BEFORE addition, not after.

  • @Umarkhan-vh5wy
    @Umarkhan-vh5wy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kindly need more explanation like.... It is classical or Keynesian etc