@@drdarrylschroeder5691 oh, thanks for telling me, when to get emotional and when not. I just have a big passion for the etudes by playing them myself. And these etudes, whilst just being a study, would have never become that famous if they would not stand out from many other technical studys (from Brahms, Moszkowski etc.) if they weren't composed with this amount of brilliant musical beauty at the same time. And for me personally, this particular performance is outstanding, so don't tell me to feel no emotional response please. Best wishes
@@theodorschiel9678 The comment is not meant to be taken personally. It is applicable impersonally in the academic sense to the type of piece which is the study and therefore an exercise as opposed to a nocturne or one of the two concertos. Obviously it was written during the Romantic period. Chopin was part of this despite being an inveterate snob. So perhaps we can finish crying now and get to some honest practice. Best wishes - Rev Dr DHA Schroeder PhD/Ministry
@@drdarrylschroeder5691 I am sorry for taking it personally. It sounded to me like was meant like that, but maybe because there is a lot of nonsense going on in comment sections. I fully understand the context of these pieces of Chopin, thanks for summarizing. Despite that, your name seems to be very important for you, which to me is a sign of either being insecure or taking yourself to seriously. Best wishes
Have loved and adored Martha for years but only came across this performance last night when I was about to close YT and go to sleep...what a miracle! First thing I did in the morning was to return to it. I can't stop crying, simply can't stop. Martha has, once again, brought so much beauty and consolation into my life. I owe her so much...
Come on! Not True! More colorful beautiful piano sound than Argerich=Wilhelm Kempff Emil Gilels Radu Lupu Artur Rubinstein Vladimir Ashkenazy Grigory Sokolov! More genius than Argerich=Sviatoslav Richter Solomon Cutner Grigory Sokolov Maurizio Pollini Stanislav Bunin Maria Grinberg Murray Perahia Alexei Lubimov Dinu Lipatti Stanislav Igolinsky! More powerful louder than Argerich=Mikhail Pletnev! The Second Loudest ever was Lazar Berman! The 3rd Loudest was Erwin Nyiregyhazi! Horowitz his technique attack better than Argerich's technique!!
This is one of the hardest to perform live, especially with nerves in a competition of this high profile. She plays it as one of the best, and that was when she was young!
for sure one of the best interpretation of this piece...theres everything in it - energy, spirit, musicality, speed, phrases and delicateness - genius!
@@hadial-mokdad5322 tbh, it's not a matter of which is better, but to understand that both pieces tell different stories and are unique for your interpretation in each way. At the highest of the highest level, comparing two performances based off of good and bad is an immature perspective of listening classical music.
For me the most perfect handling of dynamics and tempi; perfectly capturing the 'drama' that follows the A7 chord in bar 25 without overdoing it; my absolute favourite part of the piece.
Diese Gesamtharmonie trotz der erstaunlich großen und erhabenen Dynamik - eine Wonne! Und das fehlerfrei! Drüber weg spielen - war einfach nicht notwendig hier! Ich habe noch niemanden gehört, der das annähernd so gut kann. Sie ist unerreicht von Nachahmern!
Not really. Pollini's rendition is absolutely close to timing perfection, as a metronomy. Argerich's performance has a point of passion, heart...which is apparently absent at Pollini's approach to this piece
This is perfect .Each finger so strong and to get that evenness a perfectly maneuvered , subtle wrist ! And the entire etude just sings from its weighty bass .Noone sounds like this not Richter or even Pollini .She has imagination and isn't afraid to be subjective something classical music in searching for boring urtext (which ignores music ) has distressingly too little of ! I long for the day when instrumentalists show something of themselves !
It's an incredible performance of techniques. If you listen to this performance, you'll all know who the best technician of the 21st century is. Archerich's technique as a young man is comparable to Horowitz and Richter.
before somebody says, that this interpretation is best ever, please check vladimir Ashkenazy version for this chopin etude and after you can says thats want❤️
I don't think she played it - I heard the program said she was playing the Concerto in E minor when she played the one in F. It may have been incorrect.
Come on! Not True! More colorful beautiful piano sound than Argerich=Wilhelm Kempff Emil Gilels Radu Lupu Artur Rubinstein Vladimir Ashkenazy Grigory Sokolov! More genius than Argerich=Sviatoslav Richter Solomon Cutner Grigory Sokolov Maurizio Pollini Stanislav Bunin Maria Grinberg Murray Perahia Alexei Lubimov Dinu Lipatti Stanislav Igolinsky! More powerful louder than Argerich=Mikhail Pletnev! The Second Loudest ever was Lazar Berman! The 3rd Loudest was Erwin Nyiregyhazi! Horowitz his technique attack better than Argerich's technique!!
questa, a parte la versione di pollini, e la mia a 18 anni, e' la migliore esistente... La potenza e la volcita, noche' la precisione, sono di un altro mondo...
Lisitsa plays it slightly slower, but I think is an interpretation choice, not that she can't. Frederic Kempf plays it even faster, but loses all the musicality.
Magnificent interpretation! ... some rare false notes ... Best version of this relentless study after Pollini 1972 and 1960. / Magnifique interprétation ! ... quelques rares fausses notes ... Meilleure version de cette implacable étude après Pollini 1972 et 1960.
![[Round 1] Martha Argerich - Live recordings in Chopin Competition 1965](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NKlQP-eavfc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Round 1] Martha Argerich - Live recordings in Chopin Competition 1965](/img/tr.png)
A performance tarnished only by the sound of the dreams of her young competitors in that competition being shattered.
😆 so true 😂😂
Rebecca pennys be like:
always the young Argerich after her death we will have the young Argerich
😂😂😂😂😂
another performance that brought me to tears. Just amazing!
It is a Study, an exercise in dexterity, not intended to elicit an emotional response. Best wishes
@@drdarrylschroeder5691 oh, thanks for telling me, when to get emotional and when not. I just have a big passion for the etudes by playing them myself. And these etudes, whilst just being a study, would have never become that famous if they would not stand out from many other technical studys (from Brahms, Moszkowski etc.) if they weren't composed with this amount of brilliant musical beauty at the same time. And for me personally, this particular performance is outstanding, so don't tell me to feel no emotional response please. Best wishes
@@theodorschiel9678 The comment is not meant to be taken personally. It is applicable impersonally in the academic sense to the type of piece which is the study and therefore an exercise as opposed to a nocturne or one of the two concertos. Obviously it was written during the Romantic period. Chopin was part of this despite being an inveterate snob. So perhaps we can finish crying now and get to some honest practice.
Best wishes - Rev Dr DHA Schroeder PhD/Ministry
@@drdarrylschroeder5691 I am sorry for taking it personally. It sounded to me like was meant like that, but maybe because there is a lot of nonsense going on in comment sections. I fully understand the context of these pieces of Chopin, thanks for summarizing. Despite that, your name seems to be very important for you, which to me is a sign of either being insecure or taking yourself to seriously.
Best wishes
I am honestly curious.
The clarity is insane
INSANE... I remain bewildered everytime I listen to her... 😮😅
Have loved and adored Martha for years but only came across this performance last night when I was about to close YT and go to sleep...what a miracle! First thing I did in the morning was to return to it.
I can't stop crying, simply can't stop. Martha has, once again, brought so much beauty and consolation into my life. I owe her so much...
Aaarrrgh... erich. Always so wonderfully wild and perfect at the same time.
Simply unique - No one compares.
Come on! Not True! More colorful beautiful piano sound than Argerich=Wilhelm Kempff Emil Gilels Radu Lupu Artur Rubinstein Vladimir Ashkenazy Grigory Sokolov! More genius than Argerich=Sviatoslav Richter Solomon Cutner Grigory Sokolov Maurizio Pollini Stanislav Bunin Maria Grinberg Murray Perahia Alexei Lubimov Dinu Lipatti Stanislav Igolinsky! More powerful louder than Argerich=Mikhail Pletnev! The Second Loudest ever was Lazar Berman! The 3rd Loudest was Erwin Nyiregyhazi! Horowitz his technique attack better than Argerich's technique!!
This is one of the hardest to perform live, especially with nerves in a competition of this high profile. She plays it as one of the best, and that was when she was young!
That's what make this perfomance so unique! It surpasses even Richter so to say
She catches all the light and shade even at this break neck tempo
for sure one of the best interpretation of this piece...theres everything in it - energy, spirit, musicality, speed, phrases and delicateness - genius!
I would even say that this interpretation is underrated for how great it is.
Listen to Seong-Jin Cho's recording in the Chopin Competition. Unmatched in my humble opinion..
the fact that this is a recording of her playing in a competition is astonishing.
@@hadial-mokdad5322 Ashkenazy?
@@hadial-mokdad5322 tbh, it's not a matter of which is better, but to understand that both pieces tell different stories and are unique for your interpretation in each way. At the highest of the highest level, comparing two performances based off of good and bad is an immature perspective of listening classical music.
Unbelievable that this was live
Pro tip: watch movies at Flixzone. Me and my gf have been using it for watching a lot of movies recently.
@Lian Ian definitely, been watching on Flixzone for since november myself :D
@@mingzelipiano0920 they are bots lmao
@@sebastianfernandezmascagni556 oh haha now i feel stupid typing that comment
@@mingzelipiano0920 xd dw
This performance is mindblowingly good. But what else could one have expected from a young Argerich.
The fire from the youth, in this case, hers
For me the most perfect handling of dynamics and tempi; perfectly capturing the 'drama' that follows the A7 chord in bar 25 without overdoing it; my absolute favourite part of the piece.
Yeah sure
Martha!!!!!!! She always has such fire, and I love it. ❤️
Yesss it’s fire!
WOW, from first second - unbelievable velocity on those octaves.
Diese Gesamtharmonie trotz der erstaunlich großen und erhabenen Dynamik - eine Wonne!
Und das fehlerfrei!
Drüber weg spielen - war einfach nicht notwendig hier!
Ich habe noch niemanden gehört, der das annähernd so gut kann.
Sie ist unerreicht von Nachahmern!
Magnificient!
Agerich's performance is similar in sound to Pollini. Extremely light and ethereal. Just brilliantly played!
Not really. Pollini's rendition is absolutely close to timing perfection, as a metronomy. Argerich's performance has a point of passion, heart...which is apparently absent at Pollini's approach to this piece
@literatura-violintrivium-q9952 I agree 👍 with you! Argerich's performance does have more passion in her performance.
So in love with martha's interpretation 😍😍
Этюд великолепный и исполнение блестящее. Браво!
She Slayed It
Wonderful technique and amazing how clear/fast/accurate she plays it but I personally prefer interpretations that bring out the voices more.
Excellent in so many ways . . . 1965!!! Beautiful!!!
I wish there was a video, any video, of her playing this etude
my favourite chopin piece
Beautiful performance ! Thanks for sharing!
Awesome interpretation
Scary and intimidating come to mind. Pure fire.
Astonishing. I think Chopin would also be astonished, in his way-
So so beautiful.
Beautiful perfomance!!!
This is perfect .Each finger so strong and to get that evenness a perfectly maneuvered , subtle wrist ! And the entire etude just sings from its weighty bass .Noone sounds like this not Richter or even Pollini .She has imagination and isn't afraid to be subjective something classical music in searching for boring urtext (which ignores music ) has distressingly too little of ! I long for the day when instrumentalists show something of themselves !
John e martin III check vladimir ashkenazy
damn true
Every musician is different & unique than the other.
Absolutely brilliant !
Absolute perfection.
lets not forget that is martha playing in a competition, my best performances are always myself practicing at home not even in front of my teacher
Thai is incredible how she manages to play this piece like that, every sound is heard well. It is a hell a lot of devotion into it.
Fantastica!!!
I love that picture
There's so much sass and guile in this interpetation. It's understated but totally transforms the music for me.
Grazie mille per la condivisione whawwwww! Fantastica💕
amazing, as always!!
This one makes me fall in love with her, brave woman.
beatiful
Martha la grande❤
Woooooow!!!! Velocidad y precisión! 🤩👏🏻
So fast..! The technique is extremely high to be able to play this at this speed.
perfect
It's an incredible performance of techniques. If you listen to this performance, you'll all know who the best technician of the 21st century is. Archerich's technique as a young man is comparable to Horowitz and Richter.
her technique is better than horowitz, richter is toss up imo
@@usstockchannel 라이브임 심지어
not sure Archerich as a young man is as good as Argerich as a young woman, but if you say so...
The best technician of the Century may be Yunchan Lim. Listen to his Liszt Transcendental Etudes 1-12 in the same competition as his iconic Rach 3...
@@bobbarns4516ridiculous comment.
Where can I give thousand of thumbs up?!
Martha ❤❤
before somebody says, that this interpretation is best ever, please check vladimir Ashkenazy version for this chopin etude and after you can says thats want❤️
0:16
0:17 gg i win
Excelente interpretación, con la fuerza y pasión que debe tener este estudio
One of the best...some pianists played it well, but...not do fluid. Sometimes even the great names sounded a bit choppy 🙃
The bundled photos in B&W already hightlights the gaps.. frontiers remain
bellissimo
Ewidentnie to się podobało
La migliore esecuzione
i cried and i didn't even know why
the chord progressions hit you right in the feels
@@GeometryDashDyno yess
Me too, every time
Bella mujer
LA PIU'GRANDE!!!!!! QUEEN MARTHA!
👑🎹
tremenda pose de marta con el waterfall de fondo...
♥
wow
Gra Marty Argerich pozwala dotknąć fenomenu Fryderyka Chopina. Dziękuję :)
Chopin Institute, is there a recording of Etude op 25 no 10 played by Martha Argerich during the competition?
I don't think she played it - I heard the program said she was playing the Concerto in E minor when she played the one in F. It may have been incorrect.
@@owenkrahl7446 She did play the E minor Concerto (No 1), and not the F minor (No 2).
@@rigel48 Oh...in that case, I'm not sure. I heard she didn't play it, and that the program was wrong. If i find the audio, I'll send it to you.
@@lospazio she played Op.10 No.10 as well
th-cam.com/video/TlqvsLtnUX0/w-d-xo.html
Agerich was also play best strict tempo.
Pan Fryderyk Chopin jest dumą Polski! Cały naród jest z niego dumny! 🇵🇱
Much better than Ashkenazy, who could put you to sleep playing the revolutionary at 200 bpm
Come on! Not True! More colorful beautiful piano sound than Argerich=Wilhelm Kempff Emil Gilels Radu Lupu Artur Rubinstein Vladimir Ashkenazy Grigory Sokolov! More genius than Argerich=Sviatoslav Richter Solomon Cutner Grigory Sokolov Maurizio Pollini Stanislav Bunin Maria Grinberg Murray Perahia Alexei Lubimov Dinu Lipatti Stanislav Igolinsky! More powerful louder than Argerich=Mikhail Pletnev! The Second Loudest ever was Lazar Berman! The 3rd Loudest was Erwin Nyiregyhazi! Horowitz his technique attack better than Argerich's technique!!
😍
Ohhh, I always thought Ashkenazy's rendition was "the best" until I heard that!
Me too
Forse sarebbe il caso di ascoltare anche quella di Pollini!
nah he's not even in the same league
faster slightly blurred .Not better than Vladimir
@@paulhersch4787 I dont might a little blurring if the intensity increases that much!
The 9 thumbs down are deaf in one ear and cannot hear out of the other....
看到今年又一堆人被這首拍死，阿格麗希真的太神啦
真的⋯⋯⋯⋯
no phenomenal !
음색 찬란한거보소
테크닉 돌았다…
I came.
I saw.
GD Dyno I conquered.
cool
You better wipe it off the floor before Martha comes in
This is why I don’t play Chopin etudes. Not even in my dreams.
omfg.
I hear Bach in Chopin here
Indeed, this piece is harmonically inspired by Bach P&F in C book I. A kind of "hommage"
THAT IS WHY I LIKE IT SO MUCH. It has Bach in it
no wonder i dont reallyt like this
@@陳柏安-q5k I disagree.
Eso la hace mejor.
The Top Argerich 1965-1975 after less good
20 personas sordas han mirado este vídeo.
questa, a parte la versione di pollini, e la mia a 18 anni, e' la migliore esistente...
La potenza e la volcita, noche' la precisione, sono di un altro mondo...
The only woman I've heard who can play this up to tempo (maybe Lisitsa).
Seong jin cho too
Lisitsa plays it slightly slower, but I think is an interpretation choice, not that she can't. Frederic Kempf plays it even faster, but loses all the musicality.
Cziffra
@Ling Ling no, but jeong gin cho play it very good too
Ashkenazi did it. But Argerich is the best
Magnificent interpretation! ... some rare false notes ... Best version of this relentless study after Pollini 1972 and 1960. / Magnifique interprétation ! ... quelques rares fausses notes ... Meilleure version de cette implacable étude après Pollini 1972 et 1960.
Seong jin cjo is better
only Richter compares to this, really.
trop rapide il est ou chopin? c du fast food
C'est le tempo indiqué par Chopin : 176 la noire.
Wtf
too fast
Lol there's always one
you're to slow probably
Quarter Note = 176
Rushed, arbitrary rubato and dynamics
A few wrong Notes but superb
maybe Wujia Wang is the only female can play like this or at different level
Why does gender matter?
The best performance ever is that of the Grand Master Maurizio Pollini!
0:16
0:16
0:16