PEG ratio - what does it tell us? - MoneyWeek Investment Tutorials

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 97

  • @cryptogirlusa
    @cryptogirlusa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    After 11 years of posting this video, the knowledge is still so valuable

  • @fabsilva1119
    @fabsilva1119 13 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    "The ratio needs to fit the sector" (11:50).... that was worth watching this video. Nice job!

    • @curtis.couple
      @curtis.couple 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      fabsilva1119 right, I was wondering why utility companies were so low pe

  • @Discovery_and_Change
    @Discovery_and_Change 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:38 PEG = "Price-to-earnings" divided by "growth ratio"
    0:47 P/E is one way of telling whether a share is cheap or expensive
    0:57 P/E is current share price divided by one-year's worth of earnings

  • @JoseMC2193
    @JoseMC2193 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Sir, you really deserve more recognition. Thank you for all the information you are providing.

  • @shuyuye2505
    @shuyuye2505 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    one of the best teachers, clear and straight to the point explanation. Looking forward to more videos from you.

  • @514jamal
    @514jamal 12 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Very informative...I love this guy's video!!!

  • @99greenenvy
    @99greenenvy 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great, sat through countless university classes without understanding this stuff. 10 mins watching this and I have a real understanding.
    Thanks. Like your other vids too.

  • @brandtmccall5184
    @brandtmccall5184 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am a big PEG fan, and hence I have a very important question. I have always used the 5 year PEG, as I agree with you it gives far more scope than the one year. I have applied that a value of 1 is good, above the stock needs further analysis. Above 2 not to buy. But someone and I think they are incorrect about this mentioned that if the PEG over 5 years is above 1 that is good, but if it above one for one year that is not good. There is not difference if the PEG is more than 1 for the 5 or 1 year PEG it is possibly overvalued. I have read and heard always a PEG of less than 1 for the 5 year is good not more than that. Thank-you.

  • @Dsky44
    @Dsky44 12 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    this video has 8thousand views and gangnam style has over 800million views. and people wonder why they cant get jobs!

    • @arnaudmeert1527
      @arnaudmeert1527 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      gangnam style doesn't feel that long ago..

    • @AnkurSethi108
      @AnkurSethi108 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arnaudmeert1527 It was 2012, feels like yesterday

    • @vegas1854
      @vegas1854 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'd rather be full Gangnam Style than have a job.

    • @960john
      @960john 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vegas1854 You learn to invest because you DON'T want a real job. For most jobs, you don't need to know what PEG is.

    • @anangambarman4606
      @anangambarman4606 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol

  • @PaulShare1
    @PaulShare1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You explained the growth rate. So many other vids that explain PEG fail to explain the how you get the growth rate. By breaking this down you can then further explore the possible problems associated with tje PEG value.
    Great video, makes you wonder why the others bother.

  • @Intothemarket101
    @Intothemarket101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you so much for this useful data! Greatly appreciated.

  • @mohitsingha210
    @mohitsingha210 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent coverage of this topic, Sir.

  • @stephanschop
    @stephanschop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clear explanation, thanks so much. Do you have some videos where to look on for dividend stocks in particular ?

  • @acupoftea8635
    @acupoftea8635 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    9:50 if investing is that simple...

  • @peters972
    @peters972 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!
    The obvious follow up question: Is there a ratio that takes the pe or peg ratios and adjusts for expected dividends so as to bring dividend stocks under better comparison?

    • @Conangreer
      @Conangreer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      PEGY ratio. PE / (earnings growth % + dividend yield %)

  • @mariuspinte3624
    @mariuspinte3624 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, could somebody help me to clarify one mathematical aspect at minute 7:00? Why is EPS Growth defined as 20%, but when actually written in the formula only 20 is keept, and the % is left out? tnks

  • @TheVitalij24
    @TheVitalij24 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FOR NEW investor (noob) would you advice to focus on divident pay stocks?

  • @pokerista17
    @pokerista17 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, thank you so much for an insightful video! Just a question about your comment at 11:16 about cash flow -- I'm going to take your word for it that the PEG ratio tells us nothing about whether the company can turn its earnings into hard cash. But what are those factors that would keep the company from turning the earnings into actual monies? Thanks!

    • @feverpitch82
      @feverpitch82 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +John Smith ROE or Return on Equity will tell you more about whether the company can turn the earnings into profits. The higher the ROE, the more profit the firm generates from publicly traded equity

  • @yallasaikalyan8904
    @yallasaikalyan8904 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That's really a good video. But you did growth rate of earnings by comparing forecast earnings, why can't we do see the growth of last 2-5 years and place over PEG?

    • @960john
      @960john 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can. But it's still inaccurate, because you can't know what the future holds. If a company sells wine, and next year is very rainy, they don't have any vineyards to work on.. so earnings will decline. That's the problem in investing. You need to know a hell of a lot to make predictions or projections

  • @MyDreamside
    @MyDreamside 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i dont understand if p/e=10 and growth rate is 20% then why you divide 10/20 and not 10/0,2 ?

    • @slawdel
      @slawdel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +MyDreamside Because you aren't diving by the actual percentage. If you were to do that you'd have a huge number. Since a percentage is a fraction. Ex: 10/0.2 is the same as saying
      10/ 1/5. Which in turn is the same as saying 10*5. When you divide by a fraction you multiply by its reciprocal. Hopefully that helped a bit "/

  • @thefirestone8705
    @thefirestone8705 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir I've a query..... Instead of taking Future EPS growth rate in the PEG Ratio, can we take Historical EPS growth rate in the PEG Ratio? Will this ratio better work with Historical EPS growth rate as compared to Future EPS growth rate?
    Please give a reply to my query.
    Thank you Sir.🙏

    • @hansel1611
      @hansel1611 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think using historical earnings is much better in my opinion. It's usually more conservative than analyst estimates

    • @bighands69
      @bighands69 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hansel1611
      You can use both. The problem with historical is that it may not represent the future.

  • @okay4403
    @okay4403 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very clearly explained. Thank you!

  • @mr.pasuli3291
    @mr.pasuli3291 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you teaching me more than my professor at this point tbh

  • @abhinavitsmebellamy
    @abhinavitsmebellamy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video. Thanks Tim!!

  • @dailyforman
    @dailyforman 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what if i forecast -10% when PE is 10? What is PEG then?

  • @odeicastresana8036
    @odeicastresana8036 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. Q: If you buy a share with PEG=3 right now; and you expect the PEG goes further;8,9,10... That can be a posibility right? In fact Im talking about AMZ.
    Nice job!

  • @hammerhead19able
    @hammerhead19able 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you. Very helpful.

  • @sagarsingh1234
    @sagarsingh1234 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very well done!!!

  • @getrolli469
    @getrolli469 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What about negative PEG ?

    • @sulemangill7948
      @sulemangill7948 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same question.

    • @wodroi
      @wodroi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sayli5892 or the growth rate is negative , sell in my opinion , correct me if i am wrong please . :)

    • @hansel1611
      @hansel1611 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wodroi The PEG punishes low growth, high dividend yield stocks. So a company with a very low growth potential, but a dividend yield of 5% might seem overvalued. A simple fix is adding the sum of the dividend yield to the growth rate:
      PEGY ratio = P/E ratio without NRI ÷ (5 year EBITDA growth rate + TTM dividend yield)

  • @TXLionHeart
    @TXLionHeart 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What does a negative PEG ratio imply? Does it mean it's very low and, thus, attractive?
    For example, I'm looking at a company with a trailing P/E ratio of 21, and a forward P/E ratio of 19. Yet, the PEG is -25.27. Doesn't the lower forward P/E ratio imply anticipated earnings growth? Why is the PEG ratio negative?

    • @puluzo
      @puluzo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No that means company's growth of earnings decreased. That's not good.

  • @ervjun
    @ervjun 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best teacher ever

  • @AbdulHameed-hy6qg
    @AbdulHameed-hy6qg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir, informative,presented very well

  • @sulemangill7948
    @sulemangill7948 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about the negative PEG?

    • @hansel1611
      @hansel1611 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It usually means that the company is unprofitable

  • @ditshegomosienyane7252
    @ditshegomosienyane7252 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait a minute, how do you expect me to wrap my mind about what dividing a ratio by a percentage mean? I mean just mathemAtically, what does it mean? Also what theory underpins this PEG? In practice, I am interested in knowing how far apart P/e is from P/B; I achieve that by working out a ratio of P/e to P/book. In this way, I can then say how overpriced that share price in relation to the company’s indicator of networth without splitting hairs. Please respond. Thanks in anticipation.

  • @sandeepvk
    @sandeepvk 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    if we take average of Earning per share then why are not taking average of P/E during the same period ?

  • @kathrin9674
    @kathrin9674 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you, that helped me SO much!

  • @craigrik2699
    @craigrik2699 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good stuff, I've sat through many financial analysis classes and still can't remember what my tutor said, didn't help that he put me to sleep as soon as he opened his trap, thanks man. Whats with all the other products being blogged on here? losers, make your own videos, I'll check out your other vids too, cheers mate

  • @jeremyleidy5566
    @jeremyleidy5566 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video thanks

  • @bx338
    @bx338 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Based on an original concept by jim Slater. Good video on PEG but not the whole story you need to decide. You need to consider the gearing of the company and also look at the directors share dealings, with these two additional pieces of info you have a much better picture.

    • @slawdel
      @slawdel 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Derek Ferguson By gearing do you mean the direction they're heading? Such as a new company they're acquiring?

  • @youcan5863
    @youcan5863 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @gauravkapoor111111
    @gauravkapoor111111 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, @10:52 i guess growth rate can be expressed in terms of dividend...g=(1-payout ratio)*ROE

    • @hansel1611
      @hansel1611 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Growth rate is referring to the average EBITDA growth rate. If we sum the growth rate with the dividend yield, PEG turns into the PEGY ratio which is much better imo. PEGY doesn't punish low growth, high dividend yield stocks like the PEG does

  • @teeahtate
    @teeahtate 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey....THANKS FOR THIS!

  • @Hereweare75
    @Hereweare75 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do you find this information in order to make the calculations?

    • @rizywizy
      @rizywizy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      annual reports

    • @tomzablee
      @tomzablee 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just go on google/yahoo finance, or any good brokers website

  • @Joe-mz6dc
    @Joe-mz6dc 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent.

  • @mordecaimorales7264
    @mordecaimorales7264 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir Tim you explained it so well T_T

  • @KilgoreTroutAsf
    @KilgoreTroutAsf 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So basically you just have to figure out the future growth of the business...

  • @charisborquaye68
    @charisborquaye68 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tim Bennett ❤️

  • @eoin18121971
    @eoin18121971 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent ..... if it doesn't work out for you in Investment Tim, I think you could make a great comedian...Great video!

  • @gc8610
    @gc8610 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who came to the conclusion that 10% for a PE of 10 is good? 1. You yourself said all industries have different PE ratios so how can this ratio be standardised. 2. Again, what is the logic? @ If something had a PE of 100 and growth of 50% I'd consider that pretty good. I understand the math but not the reasoning. Did someone just say 10% is a good for a PE of 10? Please help.

  • @thefirestone8705
    @thefirestone8705 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot Sir🙏

  • @icyboy771z
    @icyboy771z 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do these people estimate the earnings growth? Seems like something they pull out their ass

    • @bqhatevwrsb
      @bqhatevwrsb 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Discounted cash flows

    • @hansel1611
      @hansel1611 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You average out the EBITDA growth rate

    • @sleepless2541
      @sleepless2541 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      sustainable growth rate too maybe?

  • @erandeser5830
    @erandeser5830 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For those who are not sure about "earnings", stay away from stocks. 😅😅😅

  • @mjriplada1707
    @mjriplada1707 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hihi, have you wondered this thing called the Intellitus Cash System? (check google). My coworker says it gets people tons of money.

  • @curtisianni7528
    @curtisianni7528 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the more videos I watch the more I realize that nothing is actually useful lol

    • @LinusLimMJ
      @LinusLimMJ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There are many useful financial ratios out there that you can use for your investing and trading. You got to figure which works best for you. If you are a long-term investor, you might place more emphasis on certain ratios and numbers over others etc

  • @brandonhoffmann9248
    @brandonhoffmann9248 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    chlorophyll... more like borophyll!.... zzzzz

    • @zzhughesd
      @zzhughesd 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Must be tricky jazz up this content!!!!! Yellow Lambo girls hooters this ain't

  • @remlatzargonix1329
    @remlatzargonix1329 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    (10 / 20%) does not equal 0.5......indeed, it equals 50.0

    • @hansel1611
      @hansel1611 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For PEG, the growth rate is treated as a whole number instead of as a percentage

  • @rahikalhasan
    @rahikalhasan 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, have you heard of "Thousands for Surveys" (just google it)? There you will discover beneficial facts on how you can make easy money online just by responding to simple and easy sets of questions. This helped Gary to work from the comfort of home and thus experience monetary freedom very fast. Perhaps it will help you out too...