The Higgs Boson Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ค. 2012
  • On Friday July 13 at noon, faculty and other members of the Physics Department helped the campus community understand the significance of discovering the Higgs Boson, the particle that was predicted by Peter Higgs almost 50 years ago. Mark Richards, Executive Dean of the College of Letters & Sciences, will host this discussion for the Berkeley community.
    Professors Beate Heinemann, an experimental physicist and a member of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in CERN, Switzerland, and Lawrence Hall, a theoretical physicist and former Director of the Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics, explained what the Higgs is, why it was predicted and how it was proven to exist. They were joined by panel members Professor Marjorie Shapiro, also a member of the Atlas experiment, Miller Fellow Josh Ruderman and PhD student and ATLAS member Louise Skinnari.

ความคิดเห็น • 389

  • @philipwesley4
    @philipwesley4 10 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    good idea to skip to 10.45 if you want to miss a very lengthy set of personal introductions

    • @Bobbymohs
      @Bobbymohs 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Philip Wesley V4

    • @stephenshortnacy
      @stephenshortnacy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      10:45

    • @julianreese6021
      @julianreese6021 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A tip: you can watch movies at Flixzone. Been using them for watching loads of movies recently.

    • @shepardhudson4528
      @shepardhudson4528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Julian Reese definitely, been using flixzone for months myself =)

    • @landrygael8473
      @landrygael8473 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Julian Reese Yup, I have been using flixzone for since november myself :)

  • @krischurch5677
    @krischurch5677 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome lecture. Love the humour and audience engagement with it too. Thank you

  • @sfsoma
    @sfsoma 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent presentation and discussion. Interesting group of scientists together. Thanks

  • @brainstormingsharing1309
    @brainstormingsharing1309 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍

  • @Spjungen
    @Spjungen 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Couldn't have said it better myself...
    *applauds*
    Kudos, my friend.

  • @ashok0429
    @ashok0429 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Most fascinating experience !

  • @acquiesce022
    @acquiesce022 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the "heads up"!

  • @Destitutebroadcast
    @Destitutebroadcast 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since they are approaching a quadrillion proton-proton interactions, what would happen if a created super-dense particle started attracting other particles and did not instantly vanish as theorized?

  • @GonzoTehGreat
    @GonzoTehGreat 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the best presentation of the discovery i have seen yet - very nicely done Berkeley!

  • @Dr.HazharGhaderi
    @Dr.HazharGhaderi 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice, thanks for sharing!

  • @mfoucault1984
    @mfoucault1984 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would like to have the slides of the experimental presentation, are they hanging anywhere? Thanks in advance.

  • @2blakarrow
    @2blakarrow 12 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for your support. Especially a future astrophysicist such as myself.
    My intended path: Chabot Community College -> UC Berkeley (undergrad) -> UC Santa Cruz (grad)

    • @bconigliaro
      @bconigliaro ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, did you make it?

  • @tellit2urmomma
    @tellit2urmomma 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't believe I am watching this late at night and find it more entertaining than my Xbox 360

  • @jcmana
    @jcmana 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, this really raised more questions than it answered. Thank you, UCBerkeleyEvents, for sharing this simposium.

  • @geniusofmozart
    @geniusofmozart 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting how even a discovery paves the way for at least 4 other discoveries and research topics. That's the great thing about science, there are always more questions, though it would be nice to have all of the answers one day. Solving the problem that the theoretical physicist at the start mentioned will be a prominent topic in research facilities in the future, I assume.

  • @Imafungi123
    @Imafungi123 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    How and why does the higgs field produce bosons? what causes it to do so? where does the "pure energy" come from? and what form is it in before it turns into 'matter energy'?

  • @drewcullen
    @drewcullen 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    best reply on youtube period.

  • @Redant1Redant
    @Redant1Redant 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is best 18 minute explanation of why the Higgs is important I have found anywhere on the web (starts at 10min mark) . Leonard Susskind is good too, (on You Tube more detailed and 1.5 hrs)

  • @Imafungi123
    @Imafungi123 11 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    45:29 higgs boson mass 126 x proton.....
    So what gives the higgs boson mass?

  • @VillainsVindication
    @VillainsVindication 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    man I wish there were subtitles or closed captioning on this

  • @k3vinaz0
    @k3vinaz0 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    My physics professor worked on this!! He was so excited too

  • @josephlandrut4154
    @josephlandrut4154 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    THAN YOU FOR YOUR VIDEO.

  • @ronaldderooij1774
    @ronaldderooij1774 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Try Leonard Susskind (Stanford) on the Higgs Boson here on you tube. He not only does the maths, but also explains how it works.

  • @bhojprasaddhakal7674
    @bhojprasaddhakal7674 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent presentation but i am unable to clear.

  • @user-ys4cy6jw1v
    @user-ys4cy6jw1v ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it possible to use quantum computers to slow down what you want to catch?

  • @Folkstone57
    @Folkstone57 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question 3# : Even if it did it would dissolve long before it could do much other than eat a few nearby particles.

  • @reginapendleton
    @reginapendleton 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    in quantum physics isn't any particle just an observation? I thought the actual act of observation changed the action of the particle? so how can they say that they have observed the particle without considering the observation effect?

  • @trumanthomas4253
    @trumanthomas4253 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you tell me what the mini blackhole thing in my hotel room was?

  • @sammyfromsydney
    @sammyfromsydney 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Science is my hobby, not my profession though I do have a degree in Astronomy. Listening to that, I wonder if there could be a relationship between the Higgs instability and dark energy. This is all handwaving on my part as I do not know any of the math, but could it be that the universes' acceleration could be caused by the Higgs field. ie. the field "stretching out" and pushing space apart, thus avoiding the instability...just a thought

  • @Sebbenify
    @Sebbenify 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ty men

  • @Stabacs
    @Stabacs 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is no faster than light neutrino? It was a mistake in measurement caused by a broken cable, as far as I heard....

  • @choffidge
    @choffidge 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    what's ironic about the declaration of discovery coming out on july 4th?

  • @leeryder676
    @leeryder676 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    well a simple way to explain that is while a car can be compacted.. can it be stretched.

  • @Imafungi123
    @Imafungi123 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does something with no mass (higgs field) give mass to something with no mass ( Particles before they supposedly interact with the massless higgs field) ?
    When was the first moment "mass" existed, and what caused it to exist? Is mass in essence, quanta that does not travel at the speed of light?

  • @CHistrue
    @CHistrue 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could the S-Particle be in another brane?

  • @iloveRedVsBlue
    @iloveRedVsBlue 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I believe that everything that we discover will constantly be another stepping stone and that everything can be infinatley be broken down smaller and smaller. We will still have answers, But we will constantly have more questions as a result.

  • @LovinLearnin
    @LovinLearnin 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the ones who smoke pot? Also is it also not a fact of parallel universes and realities streaming all around us? What is the 'facts' on multiple co-exsisting realities/universes?

  • @carlajones8741
    @carlajones8741 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks.

  • @lplostburq
    @lplostburq 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to be a part of that!

  • @Imafungi123
    @Imafungi123 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is the higgs field needed at all? why cant the quantites of energy/matter in/of the universe have intrinsic properties of mass?

  • @LucVNO
    @LucVNO 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sooo... All the weight of existence is in the fabric itself not the stuff in it?

  • @nmarbletoe8210
    @nmarbletoe8210 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    there is a small but finite chance that a collision will produce a buick

    • @PatIreland
      @PatIreland 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +N Marbletoe I am glad you specified 'finite."

    • @nmarbletoe8210
      @nmarbletoe8210 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Patrick Ireland "finite" as in "not infinite and not zero" ... kind of a funny way to say it. i think it would be a very small buick.

  • @Critterd1
    @Critterd1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    TY

  • @Thundralight
    @Thundralight 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Example of Something with no Mass giving mass to something with no mass
    Thought-consciousness creating music ? Does music,or sound have any type of mass?.

  • @LucVNO
    @LucVNO 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Higgs Boson is the particle that transfers that mass to reality?

  • @Destitutebroadcast
    @Destitutebroadcast 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    1.How much radiation is produced at the LHC? Please compare it to an X-ray or near a power plant.
    2.They say there have been over 800 Trillion proton-proton interactions at the LHC so far. I am not saying they did not find evidence of a Higgs Boson, but I am asking how can they tell a Higgs Boson from a computer or equipment glitch?
    3.If they increase the energy of the LHC in 2014,is there a theoretical chance (even a miniscule chance) of creating a super-dense particle (subatomic black hole)?

  • @hackerhesays731
    @hackerhesays731 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    rip dora jane dunn,garu dunnsr, gary dunn jr, julie nicholas, troy nicholas jr, all the animals that quickly decomposed, what info released for good hubs used for the opposite.

  • @iloveRedVsBlue
    @iloveRedVsBlue 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The higgs field produces bosons (which are highly unstable) that decay almost immediately into certain matter particles. Something about the higgs field allows for the transfer of pure energy to 'matter energy'. Also why the boson is sometimes considered the 'God' particle, because its the original particle that creates all other particles.

  • @rahulhaque5180
    @rahulhaque5180 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome

  • @LucasVe208
    @LucasVe208 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    if space can expand, then why could it not also contract or even bend?

  • @LovinLearnin
    @LovinLearnin 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh, thank you! I really appreciate you 'briefing' me. I think 'regular' may be relative. ;)

  • @Spjungen
    @Spjungen 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good man

  • @AlainButzberger
    @AlainButzberger 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, skipping to explanation at 10:52 is the way to go.

  • @chriscraft77022
    @chriscraft77022 ปีที่แล้ว

    no nerds can ever put it into perspective.. all these guys are are people with good memories..

  • @Remedynr
    @Remedynr 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol is it just me or does it sound at 00:14:40 like he's talking about all those "feels" on the internet recently :D reference to "I know that feel bro". Couldn't help it but start laughing

  • @venkatbabu186
    @venkatbabu186 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What are Higgs. Extremely high spin circles comparative to the nucleus of an atom.

  • @7777Ralph
    @7777Ralph 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a built in symbiotic relationship of sorts between the nature of light and the observer, like there is with the higgs field and gravity. What good would gravity be without the higgs field, and vise versa what good would the higgs field be without gravity?
    When it comes to photons, there is a relationship between the observer and the photon where the nature of the photon changes based on the act of observing. This means we don't even know how a photon works when it's not observed.

  • @Folkstone57
    @Folkstone57 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    A super dense particle would probably be rather massive. It might not attract any other particles & the more dense/massive the particle, the faster it will either break up into lighter particles, or if it's very dense it would exceed its Schwartchild radius & would collapse into a black-hole & then dissolve .

  • @trumanthomas4253
    @trumanthomas4253 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which force runs your body?

  • @sabotage2288
    @sabotage2288 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    >tfw when no qt3.14 theoretical physicist
    feel.jpg

  • @Imafungi123
    @Imafungi123 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    but anyway, you are relating this to the higgs field having no mass (but assumedly energy?) and so all the energy created in the big bang was massless until it hit the energy of the higgs field, which caused it to have 'mass'? I just dont know what he higgs field would be, it seems to perfect that the universe would belch out an all invasive, invisible, energy field which allows the affect of mass. Why cant the energy of the universe have an intrinsic mass without a higgs field?

  • @LovinLearnin
    @LovinLearnin 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I (being a regular person) assumed all physicists accept that we had 12? dimensions. I actually thought extra dimensions was a fact. Is extra dimensions like a bad word or something?

  • @Destitutebroadcast
    @Destitutebroadcast 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So much fluff on the topic, in this video I learned a small piece of the puzzle.
    1:08:49 "...I don't know any physicist who would ever use that name..." Among others, Leon Lederman (1988 Nobel laureate in physics) wrote a book entitled "The God Particle".
    I have three questions if any body has an idea, please reply-

  • @ahmedgomez1
    @ahmedgomez1 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    alguien ha imaginado alguna vez que la gravedad puede ser un efecto termodinamico?

  • @sanjayraoshedge8924
    @sanjayraoshedge8924 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sire , i trying my best to understand yur lecture !!

  • @flexedsun
    @flexedsun 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    almost there

  • @petemchardy3605
    @petemchardy3605 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you can see higs bosom with a strong magefing glass

  • @Imafungi123
    @Imafungi123 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Consciousness as far as we know depends on the physical brain and body,and consciousness itself may have mass,if it is related to the firing of neurons and brain activity such as that,so it takes relatively lots of energy to remain conscious,according to einstein that energy can correlate to mass in some way,music depends on physical objects with mass to be vibrated against other materials and through air,the sound wave is energy,while I dont know if sound wave has mass, it can impart its energy

  • @sidewaysfcs0718
    @sidewaysfcs0718 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    because that explanation is quite obvious, yes all particle are actually massless and move at the speed of light, but when the higgs interact with most of them, they move slower and gain mass.
    but it's more more hard to explain that to the public without tehnical terms.
    if you start talking about particle coupling and Z emission and spontaneous symmetry breaking and weak hypercharge, people will get bored and leave.

  • @dtrosasco
    @dtrosasco 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Replied to your last post.

  • @99bigox
    @99bigox 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    "We create and perceive our world simultaneously and our mind does this so well that we don't even know it's happening. That allows us to get right into the middle of that process." Inception
    "Like an engineer or artist, who does not know his mind, but it is painted from the mind, all Dharma is so. The mind is like an engineer or artist, able to paint multiverse (spacetime). The five clusters all are born thence, there is nothing it cannot make." Scroll 19 of Flower Garland Sutra

  • @dlaynd
    @dlaynd 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    It got me thinking we spend billions of dollars on entertainment yet have no money for science... It is outrageous to see local colleges and universities building multi-million dollar sport facilities yet their science departments go heavily underfunded for years.
    Wish you all the people who are working hard on understanding the building blocks of our universe many blessings!!!

  • @sanjayraoshedge8924
    @sanjayraoshedge8924 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lecture , i have understood most of it !please carry on , we decode dark energy and dark matter !

  • @oncebittentwiceshy639
    @oncebittentwiceshy639 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If that's how you normally "explain" things, head over to Stanford and ask Lenny Suesskind how it's done.

    • @onderozenc4470
      @onderozenc4470 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      To induce is up to Mr. Sushkin, to deduce is up to you....

  • @sidewaysfcs0718
    @sidewaysfcs0718 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    the higgs field.
    the higgs field itself is massless, and normal particle WOULD be massless, but because these 2 categories interact, the particles we see have mass.
    only 2 particles wich don't interact with the field are photons and gluons (and possibly gravitons)

  • @HiAdrian
    @HiAdrian 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Marjorie Shapiro is such a great woman. She also has a very worthwhile talk on GoogleTalks.

  • @skrie
    @skrie 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    More vids should have comments like this! :)

  • @Folkstone57
    @Folkstone57 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It was actually " The God-damn Particle " but his publisher veto'd the title.....

  • @MrKorrazonCold
    @MrKorrazonCold 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    "E2=mc2c4+p2c2 like dropping pebbles into a pond dividing a unit of space/ multiplied by one unit of time.
    The greater the mass/energy density inward spherical boson waves generating heat by multiplying electrical potential along cubic dynameters compressing the wave amplitude now+4-0-4+-the shorter the expanding transverse waves dividing gravity from its source.
    Energy compression pi +1=mass.de-compressing C2 forming acceleration-G from zero curvature, wave front by wave front as time unfolds."

  • @dtrosasco
    @dtrosasco 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    (cont.) IN CONJUNCTION with whatever spiritual ideas / materials base their beliefs. For example- "God", nothingness, creation, and the idea of a multiverse... Could not our universe have been generated as the result of asymmetrical quanta from another universe/s being aggregated in a new one (ours)? This would facilitate a practical balance of seemingly incongruous phenomena- explaining both creation and the idea of a universe from "nothing". Furthermore, would a consciousness with a "higher"

  • @sidewaysfcs0718
    @sidewaysfcs0718 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    still worth it

  • @frotwithdanger
    @frotwithdanger 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OMG, Louise makes physics HAWT!

  • @robroberts1473
    @robroberts1473 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    local colleges and universities build multi-million dollar sport facilities because they bring in multi-millions of dollars. When there are 60,000 paying fans to watch folks doing math problems then you will get some awesome buildings for that.

  • @hansenmv
    @hansenmv 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    God - i must be a geek.

  • @cody04777
    @cody04777 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    hell yeahh!!!!

  • @mtre3854
    @mtre3854 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    ScienceSunday Physics World
    Euler God Equation is a result of first mode definition of a complex number, is ok because help us a lot in Physics, but we need to know it and to be aware of it.
    Make a discussion for it I will tray to be there when I can.

  • @mwhitehurst2
    @mwhitehurst2 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So what happens when we die? Do we have symmetric particles that could live on?

    • @gasdive
      @gasdive 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      No

    • @Tony-hv6mo
      @Tony-hv6mo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Particles don’t live, and we still have no idea why random spontaneous stuff has consciousness

  • @NeedsContent
    @NeedsContent 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you from the 19th century?

  • @afriedli
    @afriedli 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    The part you are missing out, which bridges the gap between your explanation and that of physics, is the elusive ralph-moron particle. I think you'll find that when you take into account the effects of the ralph-moron what seemed not to make sense will make sense.

    • @calhappycamper4912
      @calhappycamper4912 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      E=mc² . Energy gives Higgs mass. One prediction is supersymetry for example.

  • @ANDUAN93
    @ANDUAN93 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally, no one could explain Higgs Boson to me.

  • @Levon9404
    @Levon9404 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is hard to believe in this video clips what I heard from Lawrence Hall, the speaker introduced him as physicist. He spoke about gravitons does he really serious? I'm having difficulty understand, physicist well aware of gravity is a mass-less energy, what kind of graviton he is talking about? Than he mention three type of field electric, magnetic, gravity what hell is that if he is truly physicist, he should have known that all three fields are the same they come out of nuclear force.

  • @photinoman
    @photinoman 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    einstein's lost sp.rm found ;) Nice video, good explanations for an intoductory particle physics..

  • @deathstate1
    @deathstate1 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    fascinating but i got a GED so would do i know.

  • @mrgoldie109
    @mrgoldie109 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    There has to be a 4th field, an anti-matter field, a null set to the other 3 fields (electric, magnetic, gravitational). This pyramid of forces is spooky.

  • @SitWano
    @SitWano 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't this guy from Back to the Future?

  • @MrHello888123
    @MrHello888123 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I agree

  • @MrKorrazonCold
    @MrKorrazonCold 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Dose that mean that everything is contracting and expanding, a locational spherical inward absorption and outward emission now, of electromagnetic Peter Higgs Bosons?
    You guys are right on the money!, moment by moment, wavefront by wavefront.. . .LOL!!!

  • @flyvernon7
    @flyvernon7 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    after watching this whole, very educating lecture, i have now attained my official "smart ass" card....btw the way did you know.......

  • @Opethfullcovers
    @Opethfullcovers 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In a couple of centuries (assuming we survive for more than a century.) We'll be looking at our older models of the universe and laugh at ourselves.

    • @nmarbletoe8210
      @nmarbletoe8210 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Opethfullcovers yup, even our models will be laughing

  • @elijaguy
    @elijaguy ปีที่แล้ว

    lecture begin: 10:50