Starfield - 9 NEW BIGGEST UPDATES That Completely Change It
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- Like Bethesda Game Studios' past titles, Starfield has the potential to become something much bigger in the coming years. Whether you enjoyed it or not at launch, the developer has made significant strides to improve the experience. On May 15th, its biggest update yet goes live, offering some truly game-changing features.
There are now proper Surface Maps, with major cities having markers to fast travel to. Gameplay options let you adjust everything from enemy damage to carrying capacity and even where you can access the ship's cargo from. Extreme difficulty should provide a more challenging experience for experienced players, while ship designers will appreciate the expanded interior decorating options.
Those are some of the big changes in this update, but there's even more in store. Join us as we dissect the May Update and its various other improvements.
It’s popular to hate on Starfield but I’ve put in near a hundred hours and I really like it, the recent update video give me hope and I really think it’ll be even better by the time the Shattered Space dlc comes out. For me it’s like a solid 7/10, I don’t think it’s amazing but I have a pretty good time with it.
Completely agree with. Bethesda went for quantity over quality with the exploration and it really hurt the experience. That and all the damn loading screens. BG3 also really elevated the standards for rpg’s and to some extent cyberpunk and Bethesda needs to take note.
I am always so curious about opinions like these, how is it you can play 100 hours and give something a 7? I'm not disagreeing with the score. I think i'd give it a 7 too, judging by how it was at launch. And as a result I couldn't keep playing after 20ish hours, even though I have a 1000 hours with Skyrim and Fallout 4 combined. Not hating, just trying to understand.
@@JT-zy2ft what do you play the game on that loading screens are THAT much of an issue. On pc Loading screens for me are barely even noticable in the Bethesda game sense. like Sub 3 seconds or less
@@Jerbear889 Xbox series x but coming from a game like cyberpunk where you can do and interact with pretty much everything without a loading screen. Same with BG 3. It’s just with how starfield is setup you’re seeing a lot of loading screens for everything you do.
@@JT-zy2ft Cyberpunk is also one City that is pretty small in KM squared, and BG3 is a top down RPG with little to no Physics engines. Great game but not as much depth as a BGS game, gameplay wise. Storychoices sure.
Excited to give starfield another go when this releases
These are the kind of updates the game needs, hope there are a couple more in the pipeline. I'll wait until Shattered Space before I start playing again.
i logged 180hrs within the first 6 weeks of it coming out. new game+10, level 80.. all the good stuff. then encountered a game breaking bug and lost everything. It's been very hard to get back into the game since. Very glad to see some nice updates finally coming through. Certainly getting closer to the point of being worth trying it again
You're good. No need to come back after 180 hours. Lol!
I’m glad they are updating this game ! As I have been really interested in it for so long and plan on getting it one day ! I hope they continue to add more features !
Might check it out now… it would have been nice to want to play it at launch though.
I’ve never been a massive Bethesda fan but I’ll consider seeing what Starfield has got now especially with my difficulties involving navigation as a whole with RPGs in particular.
360 hours in and the game is great!
It bothers me that so many gamers now just accept this trend of full price games being released unfinished and then praising developers for slowly patching/updating and fixing the game.
Agreed. I'll give a pass to devs like HelloGames because they were a tiny indie studio that got thrust into a world they weren't at all prepared for. But Bethesda? They're one of the biggest AAA game development and publishing companies, on top of being owned by one of the biggest tech companies in the world. They flat ass do not have any excuse for this shit.
And they didn't even fix the worst thing about the game: it's a fucking loading screen simulator. It's so bad I'm surprised you can open and close your inventory without a loading screen. Reminds me of being back in the Morrowind days.. 20 years ago.
It´s really a shame that the feature of patching a game once was just tweaking it and a little bit of fixing a game and was seen as an advantage and now it is just exploited (a lot).
I think it's more so investors and whatnot wanting the product out now rather than later. I'm not in the business so idk for sure. I also think the people praising the devs are just happy they're able to enjoy their game. I mean, just look at how they turned cyberpunk around. Bethesda needs to do an overhaul similar to what CDPR did.
I know we're certainly not okay with this though. If you have a petition to make it a law to make sure the game is absolutely finished before releasing it I'll gladly sign it, man. Haha
Take care.
chill boi
I’m one of those people that paid £100 for early access on this game played it for the first two weeks and never went back to it. Thought it was crap… I’ve reinstalled it on the series X and I’m waiting for the update to give this a second attempt.
The story does get better if you see out the early hours.
@@TheGameReelHub Everyone but you say otherwise.
@@TheGameReelHubagree
@@perryeastep5675 I think most compliants come from how the planets are created procedurally. But the story itself is pretty good.
@@TheGameReelHub I've only heard the story, and especially the ending is very lame, and the entire game feels lifeless.
I’d like to see colored reticles for long distance shooting or sniping at night
Sniping at night with a Black Reticle is no go :(
I really hope they might add seamless planetary landings ! I would really enjoy flying down to the planets and taking off ! This was a feature that very much disappointed me that was not in the game ! I hope one day they can add this feature ! 💯
Why?
I'm so excited ngl. Finally an update with some actual meat.
And I know the game is not everyone's favorite and I respect that but I believe it has potential. Many games launched in less than ideal states but managed to turn things around, like Destiny, No Man's Sky, Cyberpunk etc.
I'm giving it this year. If by the end of 2024 the game hasn't made any signifigant improvments then I'll likely move on. Until then tho I'll be intrepidly sailing the blackest sea.
I might revisit it but i've already played the main questline, which I enjoyed. I understand why others don't like it, the emptyness of procedural planets is definitely a sore point. Side quests are great though, expect nothing less from Bethesda.
DLC and car/buggy will be out months before then.
The vehicle addition makes a lot of sense but it still doesn’t change the fact that there’s nothing really worth exploring on the planets. Choosing quantity over quality was a big mistake.
@@JT-zy2ft yes, but they are literally working on that as we speak.
@@JT-zy2ft Well I think they kind of painted themselves into a corner with the scale they were going for. They wanted to make a game abt space exploration so inherently there had to be a lot of planets/systems etc, one could argue they went a little overboard, so it would be nearly impossible to handcraft every single one of theos spaces. So I understood some procedural generation would be necessary. Where I agree with you and where I think Bethesda really missed the mark was not including more handcrafted "unique" spaces/experiences sprinkled here and there for you to stumble upon amongst all the procedurally generated content. Like stumbling onto secret room within a compound you may have cleared a dozen times before but this time there's a chance to have something unusual happen, these could have been used for further exposition abt the verse its lore or its factions. You know like a diamond in the rough that makes slogging through all the copy/pasta procedural generation feel in some way more worthwhile.
Wait does changing the game settings disable achievements? Because I want more experience for taking down enemies. Since I have it at default settings I get crap XP since I am replaying again. 😅
Massive updates upcoming, especially for the veichles
Am I watching this video: yes
Do I own an Xbox: No
Iv done over 250 temples maxed all the powers to 10 and im still stoked for the update , got everything ready for my last jump , fingers crossed ita a good galaxy 😊
Hope they fix the bug at outposts when trees and other flora grow through your landing pads, habs, or anything else you place!! A landscaping tool would have been helpful as well
Not gonna lie, I’m super excited about the maps 🤦🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤗😜
I am still looking for the car that bethedsa said was going to be in the game with the new update..
Its a lot of great updates, but ive already 100%'d the game so im just gonna wait Shattered Space.
My issue was none of these problems. They need to overhaul the story
i wish this come to PlayStation 5 i am now enjoying fallout 4 soo much
Nah fuck you sony pony’s. Y’all are entitled to every game Xbox has while also gatekeeping yours. Pete Hines needs to change his mind and keep our exclusives on Xbox
With the way Microsoft are strategising, you may well see it on the PS5 in the future. Between me and you though, Fallout 4 is better :D
@@TheGameReelHub nah fallout 4 is broken and unplayable now.
the combat settings and gameplay adjustments look so much like an MCM
It's not worth the re-downlaod. They need to focus on their upcoming projects.
I agree. Huge waste of time updating a giant turd.
I’d be happier with the game, if they reduced the amount of loading screens…. By a lot!!
60fps? Because I do not and will not play at 30 it hurts my eyes
Movie must hurt then and yes, 30/40/60fps.
Yep.
Maybe i start playing this again, let see.
OMG, I played this game for 500 hours at lauch and made it all the way to NG7 before I just got tired of the navigation and loading screen annoyances. I am coming home, Sarah. I left her at a base called Dauntless on Eta Casseopia that was right near her ship of the same name for the past 8 months. Andreja and Sam are there, too, so don't worry. Stopping hitting on me and you can come there too, Barrett.
My dude they added survival mode, you gotta eat and sleep.
Finaly is coming out of pre alpha???
XD
Yeah, this is essentially what should have been the 1.0 release. Still a bunch of broken stuff though.
This game was awesome at launch. Gonna play it again with the update. 30 fps is better for me.
Man im Just waiting for the Xbox mod Menu like in fallout 4
Wow okay…you could’ve said spoilers for the end of the game.. wtf dude.
How does this game compare to mass effect
Mass effect is incredibly fun, on the other hand, Starfield is one of if not, the most boring games I have ever played . Not to say it’s bad, it’s just insanely boring a solid 4-5/10
@fridaysatjons1097 I have no plans to play this game if it comes to ps5 just wondering. Why do ms fanboys love it so much
@@batman-cu1ep not sure, guess Microsoft/bethesda fans are used to mediocrity. Bethesda fell off after Skyrim
@@fridaysatjons1097 oh wow
Sony pony mad 😡
Well, they don't change the game do they... they should have been in day 1. These are not game changers at all. It might change how you navigate a map, and your not going to care about a camera angle when talking to npc, after 5 minutes. This also must be one of the rare occasions 60fps wont help it, because the issues a fundemental issues with the base game. It just makes a boring tedious game, a boring and tedious game in 60fps.
I have had over 60fps on my pc since the release, and no, thats not the issue with the game.
And no... im not a free loading xbox gamepass moaning, i paid for the £99 premium version on steam. I have 15.3 hours on record and stopped, because its terrible.
I actually booted up fallout 76 to see how bad that was...and stayed n played for just over 200 hours, so for me, starfield is a dud. But it might be better...in 5 years ? Like 76 took to get to being good ?
No idea, but with only 5k starfield players daily on steam whom have all probably installed lots of mods. Im sorry but i did not pay £99 ($125) to have to rely on a modding community desperately trying to save the game. I expect a game to be bloody complete on purchase thank you very much bethesda.
Im not holding out its enough to support it. Skyrim has a solid 20 to 30k daily still since 2016.
In fact morrowind from 2002 released game still has 500 daily players...
Shame, as i am super old, and been playing bethesda since daggerfall. (And was 23 yrs old when even that dropped in 96').
But do they change it or have we had to do things to remind them to change it
These are good improvements, I’ll give them that. But it does not change the fact that there is zero exploration and it is just loading screen after loading screen. I will never go back to this game.
Loadin screen after loading screen? I mean dude that’s been every Bethesda game, plus the loading screens are literally like two seconds. Y’all are so entitled and ignorant to how games are actually made. Easier to just be a pretend wanna be gamer chair dev and talk crap.
@@Mrchair905 clearly you have never played a bethesda game. Yes, fallout and Skyrim have loading screens, but to get to said loading screens, you had to actually explore and play the game. Not just point and click in a menu all the time like in starfield. Oh, and I have been a gamer for over 30 years. I know what a good game looks like. And starfield is not.
@@michaelboys2602 anyone who has to brag about how long they have been playing games is someone not worth talking to. Also keep in mind just because YOU dont think a game is good doesnt mean everyone has the same opinion. I know thats a weird concept but something to consider...
@@nuttyair4643 first if all, I was not bragging, I was just stating a fact. And second, clearly you do think I am worth talking too otherwise you would not have commented. And lastly, if people like the game, then fair doos. But people are being fanboys about it and not acknowledging its flaws.
There's no reason to explore in this game and until thay changes I won't go back
Yeah the whole randomly generated planets was a mistake. Exploring is really boring since most of the planets are empty. Which in reality is probably accurate but makes for a poor game experience.
Allow us to choose where the doors & ladders go in our ships!
I don't care about loading screens, maps, or FPS!
The main quest is just an annoying faction quest that we are forced to start!
There should have been about six different main quests for different character arcs for the player to choose between! Two hero, two villain, and two neutral storylines for us to choose!
Stop making games with narrow & shallow storylines!
Oh shit i had no idea star field was still relevant
Game is not fixable.
Nah but the Outpost stuff and material farming is so garbage, should've kept it simple like they did with Fallout 4. Had a blast making settlements but outpost in Starfield is just so bad. So I can't honestly be excited for customizing in the ship...
Anything below 72fps is a big no for me since I shifted to pc
youve been spoiled by pc
Hopefully, this will change the game's fortunes.
How about add violence
Still um not buying this game until they release shattered Space & get rid of loading screens.
just hoping starfeild will get cyberpunk 2.0 treatment.
Tough shit cause that ain’t gonna happen.
@@skrunklyOwO is it that hard to get rid of loading screens??
also if they fix some npc ai & physics in the game will be much better
Is one of those updates finally adds fun to Starfield? No? Then why are you talking about Starfield?
This was the last game I bought full price. I had fun but the game was not worth the price it was set to. I hate people who keep defending thus to make themselves feel better about feeling ripped off. It's okay to be pissed off. As consumers, we are signing Bethesda's paycheck.
Bro, this might come as a complete shocker but people have different opinions. I never thought the game was bad I like the combat I like the space fighting I like building ships at no point did I want to be able to land my ship that shit seems cool for five minutes and then tedious so that gripe was never a problem for me. I always go straight to my map and fast travel. My biggest gripe was that I was always over encumbered, and had to huff it back to my ship idk that’s just me
They could have just left it as-is and never tried to improve it. Would you like that better?
Fr
So we still don't get ship dismantling? I don't understand why they continue to leave out this important feature, and who made the choice not to include it from the beginning. The whole piracy mechanic is so much fun, one of the most amazing parts of the game in my opinion, but then you're left with ships that are mostly worthless. I want to collect good parts and put them on my main ship. I mean the game literally has a skill called "Starship Design" but doesn't let me actually propelry tinker with my ship.
this is looking like the cyberpunk 2.0 effect, where the game came out horrible and little by little increased its quality
Cyberpunk was broken at launch. Starfield was not at all. If anything it was too bug free for a Bethesda game. I spent over 250 hours within the first couple weeks thinking id have to put aside till its patched. Needed none of that..
😐😐😐😐😑
This changes nothing. It’s still a boring ass empty game
Stanfield sucks
So does your mom.
So in other words, the game still stinks.
Cause the series x sucks
In pony land anyway 😂
Because Xbox just only doesnt have remakes, remaster and rebirthes?
Have fun with zero more games this year on pisstation. 😂
@@ivanexell-uz4mv in all lands
@@dusermiginte4647 oh your laughing at yourself. I would also with that stupid comment. Smh
Definitely a shame last place Sony has zero games, features or specs to compete all gen.
nobody cares, lol
starfield: disappointment the game
Just say you didn't play it and shut up
Betting people will continue to whine about it yet will still be playing it a decade from now.
@@mstach2 I doubt that games boring
Yea, k liked it tho.
@@kiingsama9441 it’s only boring if you have the attention span of a toddler.
First?
👏
Almost
Meh.
Add this to the Todd Howard lies compilation
Omg an actual map!
These sound like good changes, but unfortunately, I don’t think that there is any amount of changes that can feasibly be made that could potentially save the game. Because the problem is things like the dialogue and the story and the voice acting and inherent problems with the engine.
Ok negative Nancy, I’m excited about it. I honestly think it’ll make a comeback akin to cp2077, eight months after cp2077’s release everyone hated it and said it was beyond fixing and that cdpr were finished…well look at it now.
New content would help out tho, DLC coming out in the Fall, could give it new life 🤷♂️
I love how Todd and these games “journalists” (activists) are desperately trying to make starfield relevant now. It’s too little too late. Space vehicles or not the damn game is boring and fucking sucks. These outlets can post all the starfield propaganda they want it’s not gonna change the fact the whole game is such a massive disaster that even modders gave up on it. This game will never get a resurgence of players like cyberpunk stop kidding yourselves. It’s dead and gone.
Nope.
Do you think it's more hilarious last place Sony has zero games all gen to compete or that you only have Xbox to spend your days crying about? Both are hilarious so hard to pick.
Chin up little last place, gameless unicornkid. Only a year and half until Baby Steps. Don't forget to order the deluxe edition that comes with the diaper to wear while you play. 👶🏻👣👍
@@ryanb3908so obvious a butthurt pony😂😂
Uhh sorry but how exactly can a single player rpg ever be “dead”? As long as there is 1 person playing then the game then it’s not dead.
@@skrunklyOwO exactly lmfao