Take it one step further: Hold to account agents of the State for violating the Constitutional rights of others, perhaps even criminally if such violations are found to be intentional.
Since their just powers are derived from the consent of the governed and the courts abandoned their oath to the Constitution and uphold the law, then it would naturally be fitting to yank their just powers and override/overstand the court with original private jurisdiction of the republic which is actually foreign to the special maritime jurisdiction that the courts are operating under and is inferior to the jurisdiction of the republic. "court clerk note that the judge has abandoned his/her oath of office and office and I order this case dismissed with cause and prejudice. This meeting is now adjourned."
@@Ha-Youll-Never-Guess-Who-I-Am but then you will need a third police called the “police police police” that police police police who then police police
081321. There are other cases that apply Mapp v Ohio. A man called the police once in his house the police arrested the man for stolen property. Because the police did not have a warrant to search his house 4th Amendment Violations plus no warrant to search. The case was dismissed. There are many other similar cases. Once a US citizen states I don't want you in my house. The search should stop. Especially since non tax payers are living on the streets in their make shift homes safely. Its a shame SOME citizens don't get the benefits of our Constitional & Civil rights that people died for. HeavenLee Justice
Of the 3 decisions Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) I would like to see Gideon v. Wainwright overturned the most, then Mapp v. Ohio second most and Miranda v. Arizona the least. I think all 3 were bad decisions but if I could only have one overturned it would be Gideon v. Wainwright
Police still do illegal searches and seizures even with the exclusionary rule, it's hard to imagine how bad they would get without it. I watched the video just yesterday wear a cop arrested a guy for a wide right turn just so he can search his car and use the inventory excuse.
thanks this helped with my American government homework
Thank you. I've read this for my criminal justice homework, but I am a visual learner. This made it clear and easy to understand. Thank you so much!
Take it one step further: Hold to account agents of the State for violating the Constitutional rights of others, perhaps even criminally if such violations are found to be intentional.
★ Froggie Animation ★ huh??? I think that would be the very definition of justice
Another remedy is to fire the cop and charge them with the same crime as a common burglar.
Better have a warrant.
Since their just powers are derived from the consent of the governed and the courts abandoned their oath to the Constitution and uphold the law, then it would naturally be fitting to yank their just powers and override/overstand the court with original private jurisdiction of the republic which is actually foreign to the special maritime jurisdiction that the courts are operating under and is inferior to the jurisdiction of the republic. "court clerk note that the judge has abandoned his/her oath of office and office and I order this case dismissed with cause and prejudice. This meeting is now adjourned."
What do you do when the police won't police themselves
make another police to police the police of course
@Aidan V i don’t know if giving me that much power is the best idea . . .
@@Ha-Youll-Never-Guess-Who-I-Am but then you will need a third police called the “police police police” that police police police who then police police
Maybe prosecute police for illegal activity like breaking and entering as well to disincentivize *illegal* behavior as well. Weird I know >.>
Go to the police to report the police, makes sense.
081321. There are other cases that apply Mapp v Ohio. A man called the police once in his house the police arrested the man for stolen property. Because the police did not have a warrant to search his house 4th Amendment Violations plus no warrant to search. The case was dismissed. There are many other similar cases. Once a US citizen states I don't want you in my house. The search should stop. Especially since non tax payers are living on the streets in their make shift homes safely. Its a shame SOME citizens don't get the benefits of our Constitional & Civil rights that people died for. HeavenLee Justice
Thank you!!!
Of the 3 decisions
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
I would like to see Gideon v. Wainwright overturned the most, then Mapp v. Ohio second most and Miranda v. Arizona the least. I think all 3 were bad decisions but if I could only have one overturned it would be Gideon v. Wainwright
To the point, great presentation
Police still do illegal searches and seizures even with the exclusionary rule, it's hard to imagine how bad they would get without it. I watched the video just yesterday wear a cop arrested a guy for a wide right turn just so he can search his car and use the inventory excuse.
I think states might actually impose remedies that are better than the exclusionary rule
The police are policy enforcers, they lie and make up false charges to extort money from the people.
Thank you
Exclusionary rule that's not at all exclusionary anymore, so why even both with this?
It is still a rule
No the evidence should me used in court 4TH AMENDMENT
what civil liberties were being considered in this case??
If I'm not mistaken, the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and the unspoken right to privacy.
Don king bought me here
Tainted evidence.