The Final Hunt for Jack the Ripper: A Journey Through History | Murder Casebook | Real Crime
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- Jack the Ripper. In this episode, Fred Dinenage takes a journey back to the poverty stricken East End of 1888 and speaks to Ripperologists about the continuing fascination behind the Jack the Ripper mystery. With interviews from historian John Bennett and author Linda Stratmann, we tell the story of life in the East End and what could have led to some of the most horrendous murders of the 19th Century. We also discover a new suspect who maybe the man we have been looking for.
Make sure you subscribe to get your regular crime fix: / realcrime
From "Murder Casebook"
Content licensed from Woodcut International to Little Dot Studios.
Any queries, please contact us at:
owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
To be fair, given the dismal water sanitation, it was probably often safer to drink alcohol
I know that was true for most of history which is why even kids drank alcohol. They watered down wine or drank ale and mead for most of it. It was only if you had a clean stream or a decent well that you could count on the water. I've heard historians go back and forth about how bad the water really was and when people did or did not drink water. Too bad they didn't know about boiling water. I think that would have killed most things.
@@marniekilbourne608 The drinking of ale took care of that issue. The water is boiled in the process and the alcohol keeps it from getting contaminated again. The people just didn't know that was why it worked.
Another reason the killer was able to make his getaway so easily is that Victorian London at the time was really dark, especially in a low-income area like Whitechapel. Streetlamps are expensive. You could be half a block away and not see him.
I haven’t looked into the moonlight phases for those murders, but if he was choosing no moon nights or when the moon was smaller to kill, then your theory may hold water
A great uncle of mine visited south London in 1893 and in his journal he wrote: "Such a terrible haze and fog about. Take a deep breath through the mouth and I would bet my gold tooth, if I were one prone to gambling, there would be tar and muck in your spittle"
My neighborhood is so bad that they installed 100 new streetlamps which reduced crime by 50 percent. It would have been 100 percent but half the lamps were stolen
@Lucio Di Pace it can be
He knew the area, grew up in the area. Worked in the area as well. Charles Allen Lechmere.
Possibly the reason that the man named William Webber (Milkman), his wife and daughter moved to Hartlepool, North England from London is because they were trying to move away from the East End Lo London, where the Poverty and Crime was so bad at the time. Especially, living in Whitechapel where Jack the Ripper was killing. My interest in the Jack the Ripper, is that my bloodline ancestors were living in Whitechapel at the time. I know that they moved to WestHam, Essex soon after and I believe they too were trying to get away from this Notorious area where Jack the Ripper roamed.
Maybe. And I don't think he was a butcher, but a doctor. Maybe he didn't live there, but for some reason he well knew the place. Maybe his nanny was from that place?
Thanks for your information. People argue about whether Jack had medical knowledge or not. The question isn’t whether he had such knowledge but how he could have possibly removed the desired organs in Mitre Square in the dark. Even a horse/pig/cattle butcher couldn’t do it in the dark.
Totally. I mean he is interesting but its very thin gruel.
Whoever Jack was, he blended in with everyone else, so, was no one dressed nice or riding around in a fancy carriage.
Many say he was one of Queen Victoria's grandsons therefore the police didn't much endeavour to find him.
@@VenusEvan_1885 Yeah, idiots say that
@@VenusEvan_1885 what were their names
obviously, you didn't read the witness testimonies very well. they were all seen in the company of a fancy gentleman carrying a doctor's medical bag and wearing a fancy top hat. and there were several horse-drawn carriages parked nearby. Elizabeth Stride was found with a fancy box of chocolates and a bunch of grapes in her hands when she died. although she didn't have a chance to eat any of them.
I don’t usually get choked up watching true crime, but this one hit hard. Beautifully told - thank you!
😆😆😆😆😆😆
Yeah, right, he is just having a laugh like Uncle Nugget.
My favorite Jack the Ripper movie adaptation by far is the 1988 miniseries with Michael Caine. Excellent.
So the only real note was the one with the kidney. And he was unlikely to be a foreigner, bc the last victim was killed at a time when people were already afraid of it being a foreigner. One last thing, it is not a certainty that he stopped bc he was incapacitated in some way: there are cases of serial killers who stopped not because they were dead/incarcerated etc, but bc they stopped, for a while... the while can be some years. It is also of note that the last victim was mutilated especially viciously; perhaps he had reached whatever he was reaching for, and took a break.
He was on a mission. Lusk was a greedy wannabe who needed a wakeup call. He got it in spades.
Jack the Ripper was a educated man.If his letters are anything to go by
@@marilynashley9784those letters were not written by J.T.R. ALSO he was not a well educated man because J.T.R. was a delivery person for a meat company.
From all the docs I have watched about this case, Charles Lechmere seems like the best candidate to me. He wasn't foreign I don't think but he lived and worked in the area of the murders and was caught by one of the bodies by another man and he said he just found it and directed the guy to go get a policeman. He also gave his name as Charles Cross (his stepfather's last name). He gave some testimonial and the police did interview him. They have a picture of him as an older man. I think he worked in a slaughterhouse so having blood on him would not be unusual. I also think that some previous murders were his early handiwork and there were a couple after that they don't count for some reason. They just kind of let the case go like they knew at some point the guy was off the streets. He did spend some time in an asylum. It's very strange.
@@marniekilbourne608I saw somewhere that the letter with the kidney was considered a prank by many people. Like there was no way of identfying at that time that the kidney does really belonged to Elizabeth stride.
I have been on the Ripper tour, and it was a thrill, the guide was very knowledgeable, his way of describing the murders were spine-chilling.
I am afraid to say that unless we have a time machine, we shall never be able to identify who the true killer is.
We must track this villain. But how? Well, that's...
elementary!
Lechmere
ghosts that appear and disappear
@@thabomauoane4779 Mrs Battersby
She said the only reason he stopped was because he either was arrested, or in an asylum…. What a load of rubbish… what if he just moved out of the area, I’d say start looking at other places to see if there are any similar killings…. I also heard that he probably went to the Americas, perhaps NYC… 🤷🏻♂️ but like dude said, we’ll probably never know who he was or why he stopped… if he even did stop.
A serial killer uselly stays in the area it's a baffling case really
1st time I’ve heard about a piece of apron, from the victim, being found in a far different location.
I was surprised that they didn't mention that right above where that piece of apron was found was some graffiti that may have been written by the Ripper.
@@otisdylan9532 I think that was there already and had zero to do with the case.
@@TheIndependentLens That's possible. We really don't know. If nothing else, it's a big part of Ripper lore. What they could have done is mention it, and add that it's uncertain whether or not The Ripper wrote it.
@@TheIndependentLens I don't agree. He had just been close to the murder site of Miriam Angel. He assaulted and killed a woman, and nobody did a thing to stop him. Upholsterers use chalk.
The best jack the ripper documentary I've seen so far on TH-cam...and I've seen them all literally. Very well done
You probably haven't seen "JTR The Missing Evidence" though.
Watch "The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper" The best documentary and suspect.
@@blazbratovic2724 Yes. You know it.
@@walkawaycat431where can I see it?
@@drunkensailor112 "The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper. On you tube
May Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Catherine Eddowes, and Mary Jane Kelly all rest in peace.
R.I.P these poor women. Salutes from Tampa, Florida.🎉🎉🎉
Yeah right, he just having a laugh like uncle nugget.
Here’s a possible theory, not about the identity of the killer, but about his motive, psychologically: when you know what the killer’s motive was, it usually helps to point to the identity of the murderer. The official belief was that the Ripper was a sexual deviant and killing those poor women and obliterating their corpses was how he got his kicks. But I think that might be at least partly wrong. What he did was evil and sick, that I agree. But what if he was enacting a different kind of fantasy on his victims. I think he might have been a social deviant, (a Narcissist or psychopath at the very least) instead of a sexual one, and I think there was someone in his close circle, his personal life, who he couldn’t harm but very much wanted too. A relative or spouse perhaps. And probably female, because no man was ever killed by the Ripper, as far as we know. He’s cognizant enough to know the police will focus on him if anything bad happens to this person, but he is emotionally immature enough that he doesn’t dismiss the evil and dwells on it to the point that he feels he must act, to release the violent rage inside him. So he goes out and kills complete strangers instead. And these unfortunate women happened to be quite common in the place where he lived and worked. He had nothing against his victims personally. He was fantasizing about murdering someone else, and was using them.
He may have wanted to harm someone who was already dead; possibly his mother, which is why he took the uterus
So you must like JAmes maybriCK as your ripper
@@davidhallett8783 I see what you did there. I like it, I like it. That little puzzle is just as good as any other theories.
@@davidhallett8783 Charles Allen Lechmere.
@@brettbanta2100 Charles Allen Lechmere is by far the best suspect.
I think that if we found out for certain who Jack the Ripper was, we would be hugely disappointed. You can be sure that he was at least superficially very ordinary and blended in with the scenery.
Charles Allen Lechmere.
@@walkawaycat431 Possibly.
@@tangerinefizz11 More than likely.
@@walkawaycat431 he would have had blood all over him
@@tinahillsdon2776 The victim was strangled, there would be no arterial blood spray. When the heart is not pumping the blood does not squirt out. You seriously did not know this? I'm speaking about Polly Nichol's.
I believe someone, at the time, knew who Jack the Ripper was...there would have to have been visual evidence of blood on the man, or men; the question is, did that knowledge come down through the generations...or did that/those people bury it, for their own reasons...
Not if he walked into his job at a meat delivery slaughter house. Watch "The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper" on Smithsonian channel.
@@walkawaycat431 I watched it twice and I'm convinced Charles Lechmere was Jack the Ripper 🤯
@@EternaResplandiente Have you watched "The House of Lechmere"? Edward Stow's channel. He helped Christer Holmgren with his book and the documentary. Edward Stow probably knows more about the east end of London and JTR than anyone alive. Susan Lechmere is his camera operator for his videos. There is so much more circumstantial evidence than they show in the documentary. I've learned a lot. Have a great day. Christer Holmgren and Edward Stow are both on videos "The Jack Ripper tour channel"
@@EternaResplandiente Firstly, there is No evidence let alone Proof, that Cross is Lechmere. The fact of the matter is - no killer, let alone a Knife killer, would approach a witness who has Seen him now, then walks away chatting with him & then makes himself Known to the Cops. Then, continues skulking around the streets in the early morning hours when Many people know he was on the scene of that victim & he is Known to More of the cops because he did go to the inquest. Even if Cross is actually Lechmere, who lived in Whitechapel his whole life & worked at Pickfords for over 20 years, then he is Well Known to loads of locals & work colleagues & as a carman, also business associates. A couple of Morons make a doc & fooltube videos putting about that - he continued walking the streets in the black early morning hours for Weeks & carried on approaching prostitutes In Front of people & did the killings with the same & much worse MO. And people are drinking the Kool aid no matter the lunacy of the ‘reasoning’ behind the blather.
@@walkawaycat431 Firstly, there is No evidence let alone Proof, that Cross lived at that address & so, no Proof that Cross is Lechmere. An inquest document online - Chas. Andrew Cross. The fact of the matter is - no killer, let alone a Knife killer, would approach a witness who has Seen him now, then walks away chatting with him & then makes himself Known to the Cops. Then, continues skulking around the streets in the early morning hours when Many people know he was on the scene of that victim & he is Known to More of the cops because he did go to the inquest. Even if Cross is actually Lechmere, who lived in Whitechapel his whole life & worked at Pickfords for over 20 years, then he is Well Known to loads of locals & work colleagues & as a carman, also business associates. A couple of Morons make a doc & fooltube videos putting about that - he continued walking the streets in the black early morning hours for Weeks & carried on approaching prostitutes In Front of people & did the killings with the same & much worse MO. LOL. Really??
All the jibber jabber about 'times' for 3 cops & 2 other men is boring as all hell Childish friggin Bunk, nobody will Ever get it sorted. 5 men have No Idea what time they were where. End of. Each one says a time, each newspaper states various times & Christer makes up His own time to suit his stupidass 'theory' about a guy by the name of Charles A. Cross & Christer does Not Know his home address. Putting modern font on a page with 1888 newspaper headers above, is Not proof of Cross' home address. The professional hypnotist Stealthy Eddy Stow has made up His own 'times' to suit His mind numbing Gobshite & repeats it all over & over as his Brainwashing tactic. LOL.
Umm, get a Grip, there most certainly Were other males who came across other of the bodies.
Cross sure Did raise the alarm Straight Away, he did Not keep walking on down the road. It is very understandable considering the Times & the conditions for that area in 1888, that when he saw a woman who lay prone on the ground, his thoughts went to someone who had maybe been attacked & as there were lots of prostitutes who roamed around in the early morning hours, he was very well aware that would be the case & as they were known to Drink, his first thoughts did not turn to murder. If I was a male back then in Whitechapel, I sure as hell would Not have wanted to be the male to try & wake her up at 3.30 a.m., all by myself, at the very least, in whatever state, she could have just started screaming. He did Nothing wrong.
I do Not believe the Rubbish from Holmgren or Stow, both dopes who think they are smarter than all the police involved including Inspector Abberline from Scotland Yard who was brought in after the murder of Mary Ann Nichols, as he knew Whitechapel very well.
There are Zero 'connections' lovey & the bunk about the same guy being the torso killer is also Nonsense.
I pity people like you, I really do. And BTW - in regards to Nichols, there were Two cuts to her throat plus 2 stabs to the vagina, several stabs & cuts to the abdomen causing the Bowels to Protrude through the abdomen. Now you are Informed of the basics, pleease don't carry on as if there would have been no blood on that friggin Knife, or anywhere else. In the black of night down that road with high buildings both sides, the killer would Not have Known about blood on his person, clothes or shoes. End of.
And FYI - Mary Ann had bruises on her face And on her hands, meaning, she put up a Fight.
And people are drinking the Kool aid no matter the lunacy of the dumb as dog doo ‘reasoning’ behind the blather. LMAO. Doh.
I don't care what these ladies life style was may they rip 🙏 the horrific agony they went through 😪 cheers stevo 🍀🍀🍀🍀
Ladies of the night was always & remains the easiest targets, which is why Jack went after them, duh.
amen...a guide to the tour that Jack London went on led them through White Chapel church yard,where families slept rough in the church/graveyard. The guide told them that the price for the women's bodies was a penny,a loaf of bread, or a hunk of cheese...you'd literally pay more for a loaf of bread than you would use of their bodies. Sad thing is,our values as a society haven't changed that much regarding our perception of sex workers.
@sphinxrising1129 Right. He wasn't specifically targeting prostitutes. They just went along with him in dark corners, they were available. No self respecting Victorian woman would be caught dead (no pun intended) in the streets in the middle of the night. Have you watched "The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper" on the Smithsonian channel? It's much better than this rubbish documentary.
Ahem, they weren't the ones for whom doing the rip was their jam... You could almost say that they weren't rippers.
The way the guy described the mutalations ... i had a perfect picture in my mind ...
I’m in agreement with Christer Holmgren as Charles Lechmere (aka Charles Cross) being Jack the Ripper and the Thame Torso murderer.
Hey there! You're correct. They haven't even mentioned him. Can't take any documentary seriously that leaves out CAL. That means they know nothing about JTR.
Firstly, there is No evidence let alone Proof, that Cross is Lechmere. The fact of the matter is - no killer, let alone a Knife killer, would approach a witness who has Seen him now, then walks away chatting with him & then makes himself Known to the Cops. Then, continues skulking around the streets in the early morning hours when Many people know he was on the scene of that victim & he is Known to More of the cops because he did go to the inquest. Even if Cross is actually Lechmere, who lived in Whitechapel his whole life & worked at Pickfords for over 20 years, then he is Well Known to loads of locals & work colleagues & as a carman, also business associates. A couple of Morons make a doc & fooltube videos putting about that - he continued walking the streets in the black early morning hours for Weeks & carried on approaching prostitutes In Front of people & did the killings with the same & much worse MO. And people are drinking the Kool aid no matter the lunacy of the ‘reasoning’ behind the blather.
Absolutely True ✅😈🇬🇧
It is an absolute misconception that serial killers never stop. There are multiple examples of that. Some of them stopped for years and continued later others stopped entirely.
What if he went somewhere far and quiet and continued murdering people . Coz I think at that time boarding a ship and escaping to another country was not that difficult.
I know that it's a fictional story of J the R, but I loved the movie 'From Hell's starring Johnny Depp, at least it had a semi happy ending!
That was a great movie !
Did you really just write "j the r"??? Why? Nobody calls him that. Yall really abbreviate any damn thing huh? 🤦♂️ lol
What do you mean - semi-happy? A women got murdered in her stead?
My theory is he was part of the vigilantes.
What better way to patrol the streets.
Officer: what you doin?
Just patrolling for jack the ripper.
Officer: same carry on then.
Can't be William. People whom have a history of abuse do it on impulse. They explode. They can't hold their rage long enough to walk the streets looking for the weakest amongst society. That takes patience and stoicism. Completely different behaviors
Not true they learn to channel it trust me 😈😎
They have found him you know? 😁
What if Jack the Ripper was caught red handed with the first victim? If that's the case then his name was Charles Allen Lechmere...he was caught right next to the first victim, before her blood even had time to pool. He lied to the policeman he passed after he left the scene. During the investigation, he gave a false name, Cross. This was briefly his stepdad's name as a child and he only used the name Cross twice! Once when he accidentally ran over and killed a kid, with his cart and again years later when he was found with the first victim.
If a cop stopped me and I gave him the name "Graves" my former stepdad's name, the cop would say I gave him a false name.
Charles' job had him riding a cart, around the same streets as the victims and early in the morning, when most were killed. One of the murders occurred at a different area and Charles just happened to be visiting his mother in that very area, when she was killed.
A bloody apron was found, near one of the murders. Lechmere was a "carman" and if you look at pictures of Car-men from around back then, they _did_ wear a leather apron. They'd pickup and transport goods and raw meats, to businesses in London. Also even though Lechmere wasn't working that day, for some reason he wore his apron to the inquest.
And he only came forward, several days later, after a newspaper mentioned there had been a second person who "discovered the body".
A police man arrived at the body, a couple minutes afterwards and said there was a large pool of blood around her. And yet when Lechmere and the other man were there, minutes earlier, they couldn't see any blood. Which means she must have been stabbed just before the man rounded the corner and saw Lechmere there; as the blood hadn't even seeped through her thick Victorian clothes yet.
And there's alot more very suspicious circumstances surrounding Lechmere and this case. I highly recommend watching some of the many videos on him and deciding from yourselves!
Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde was the popular play doing the rounds at that time.
if we look back in medical history bodies and body parts were a valuable commodity. I have watch several jack the ripper documentaries, and I have always wonder if it was someone wanting body parts, and thought prostitutes would not be missed.
That would explain how he possible moved out of the east end of london, and would make sense that there was one last one before he moved out of london for good. It gives a believeable motive and explains why they were so gruesome without having obvious connections. Plus if he did this regularly he would have the skill he needed with the knife.
Charles Allen Lechmere aka Charles Allen Cross. The police had him right at the first murder scene but let him go.
yup
Oh the flavour of the month Lechmere crowd. 😂😂😂😂
He was a witness, not the killer.
@@TheIndependentLens nah. He actually checks off a lot of boxes that other fly by might suspects don't.
@@matthewwilliams9584 maybe. He also might be the killer who just thought on his feet when he was almost caught. And the geographical profile fits him extremely well..... even the killing that happened south of white chapel road can be explained because that happened in his day off and his mom lived over there where he used to visit his child. As far as named suspects go he fits best with the data.
Whichever way you go with a culprit. The fact that he was so good at what he did something had to have happened to him to narrow down a logical suspect. The lady is right. There was no reason for him to stop. It's sick and sad but it is what it is.
That simply isn't true. It's a myth that serial killers don't stop, because there have been quite a few who did. One notable one was BTK, who stopped because he had a close call and didn't want to get caught. The exact same thing might have happened to Jack the Ripper. We don't know why he did what he did - apart from the standard pseudoscientific profiling explanations - so we don't know why he stopped.
He didn't stop. He also committed the Thames torso murders.
Mary Ann Nichols never dreamed she'd be on TH-cam in 2023
I often think if someone told these women would be famous a 100 years on what would they think
I don't know how to tell you all this but I think he got away .... 🤔
You give up too easily. We'll catch him.
The blood of Jack the Ripper's victims cry out for justice from the ground.
While he had escaped men's justice,
he will surely be called to account
when he meets their Maker.
at 7 minutes and 48 seconds this is already at fault
P.C Neil did not find the body , he was the 3rd person with the body.
1st was the killer [ who told nr2 he found a woman ]
2nd the man who came a few minutes after him [ together the went for help [ at least that is what the 2nd person thought ]].
3 rd P.C Neil
4 th the copper send by person 1 & 2
Exactly right. I lost interest in this after that error. Charles Allen Lechmere found the first body.
Firstly, there is No evidence let alone Proof, that Cross is Lechmere. The fact of the matter is - no killer, let alone a Knife killer, would approach a witness who has Seen him now, then walks away chatting with him & then makes himself Known to the Cops. Then, continues skulking around the streets in the early morning hours when Many people know he was on the scene of that victim & he is Known to More of the cops because he did go to the inquest. Even if Cross is actually Lechmere, who lived in Whitechapel his whole life & worked at Pickfords for over 20 years, then he is Well Known to loads of locals & work colleagues & as a carman, also business associates. A couple of Morons make a doc & fooltube videos putting about that - he continued walking the streets in the black early morning hours for Weeks & carried on approaching prostitutes In Front of people & did the killings with the same & much worse MO. And people are drinking the Kool aid no matter the lunacy of the ‘reasoning’ behind the blather.
Ms. Stratmann, one of the featured experts, is hanging on to the old notion that serial killers can’t stop. Is this an old video? More modern analysts realize these killers can stop if they are so motivated. None of them want to but some of them can. Jack probably did and relocated himself. That’s why Americans and others look to see whether they can spot similar crimes after 1888.
The Thames torso murderer. Watch "The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper" The best documentary and suspect by far. You won't be disappointed.
These guys on here are really not experts. Christer Holmgren, Edward Stow, Donald Rumbelow, and Derek Osborn are the true experts. I forgot about Richard Jones. But no one alive knows more about the Ripper murders or the east end of London than Edward Stow.
From all the docs I have watched about this case, Charles Lechmere seems like the best candidate to me. He lived and worked in the area of the murders and was caught by one of the bodies by another man and he said he just found it and directed the guy to go get a policeman. He also gave his name as Charles Cross at that time (a name he formerly had before his mother remarried I think). He gave some testimonial and the police did interview him. They have a picture of him as an older man. I think he worked in a slaughterhouse so having blood on him would not be unusual. I also think that some previous murders were his early handiwork and there were a couple after that they don't count for some reason. They just kind of let the case go like they knew at some point the guy was off the streets. He did spend some time in an asylum and I think that coincided with the end of the murders. It's very strange.
Jack the Ripper gave himself THAT name in one of his letters! In one of his letters there was the 3 initials of Walter Rihard Sickert. Another one of those oddities that most decide to ignore!
Thinking about evidence, the best evidence would be a modern autopsy of each of the victim’s remains if possible.
Yes! Get in your Time Machine and head back to get started on that!
yes, and dna, then up from nowadays match. Starting from the letters' saliva. And if some victim's bones has remained, they can see if they had syphils.
@@TheIndependentLens 2000 years old bones are found.
@@antonellabanto Dude;, shut up! Have a relevant point! Wow! Freaking annoying.
@@antonellabanto Yes, and anthropologists just excavated H.H Holmes remains. It is an entirely viable method, although English burial traditions for the poor could make it challenging.
No one has proposed why Jackie killed. Why he got more brutal. Why he disappeared. Why was he was soooo angry. These are all related.
Are we calling him 'Jackie' now? lol
@@renejean2523 slang for Jacob. I think he was Jewish. A combat veteran, had PTSD, Had VD. and went insane from mercury poison and syph.
I wonder if the Ripper’s dropping out of sight may have been due to an extra long ‘cooling off period’, after the last and most brutal and time spent murder? Feeling satisfied, he may not have started up again until much later on,( maybe years) and somewhere else. By this then his M.O. may have changed somewhat,as well.
More likely, he died, was injured, imprisoned, moved away.
@@sphinxrising1129 Those are pretty much all the reasons to stop 😂
Poor Lechmere, everyone pointing at him just for finding the body. Not fair.
True and very recently
Lechmere managed to evade scrutiny in his lifetime. It's only modern police theory that focusses on the "finder" of the body and looks for people who can hide in plain sight, rather than depraved lunatics.
Charles lechmere was the first on the scene at bucks row and is currently a prime suspect 😎
They didn't even mention Lechmere... or Robert Paul. Let's not forget the Thames Torso murders. From 2013, no wonder...
@@catfishcave379 btw if Lechmere didn’t do it how was no other person seen since the murder had just happened and Paul and pc Neil were converging on the site from the only opposite directions possible?😎
@@joelmahan Exactly! When Paul knelt down next to the body, his pants had no blood on them, 5 minutes later, there were pools of blood on the ground.
Are you familiar with Edward Stow and the House of Lechmere channel on TH-cam?
It definitely wasn’t Lechmere.
@@catfishcave379 totally-the only way out for lechmere if he’s innocent is if the killer went into one of the houses on bucks row-there was no exit along the street .
house of lechmere is great😎
Actually some serial killers do stop for long periods of time like BTK who actually stopped till captured
Very few.
@@TheIndependentLensBTK, Golden State Killer, Green River Killer, and many lesser known serial killers stop killing on their own. It’s a myth that they keep killing until they’re arrested or killed. Most of them age out to the point where they become too old to physically put in the work, or their sex drive/need to kill decreases significantly, as it does for most of us when we get older, or they don’t have time anymore due to having kids and not being able to sneak out of the house, or for any number of reasons.
In the early days of behavioral forensics, it was thought that serial killers couldn’t stop on their own, but now we know that to be a myth. Jack the Ripper probably stopped on his own.
I'm surprised you didn't bring up the DNA testing. I would love to hear more about that
This happened in 1888. Most likely there is no DNA. And if you’re referring to the shawl, there’s never been proof it actually belonged to Eddowes.
@@DannyDGeorgiathis video said the piece matched perfectly to the rest of the shawl on her body (though that's the first time I've heard that)
No mention of the graffito, which may or may not have been written by Jack. It's a shame they didn't photograph it and compare handwriting to the letters. Also a shame that the kidney sent to Lusk could never be conclusively matched to the actual victim.
@@drbigmdftnu I believe the word in this video that was used was apron. There was never a listing, or a mention of a shawl in the police reports. And the piece that was ripped away did match her apron, and it was discarded in Goulston Street.
agree
we
never drink much alcohol plus if
not often
we
are
no
BiTches were no
No dna
After studying Jack for many years and watching every video that ever came out on him I am left with two theories …
The first is that Jack was Charles Allen Lechmere . He was the one who “discovered” Polly but in my opinion based on inconsistencies in his stories , the lie about his identity and his ties to each crime scene he didn’t discover her he was discovered with her after he killed her .
But my other theory that has been growing stronger for a while is that there was no Jack The Ripper. I know I know that would kill the fun and mystery of one of the biggest murder mysteries of all time but I have my reasons .
First many myself included don’t believe Polly was victim 1 if there was in fact a single serial killer . I believe it was likely Martha Tabrum. But let’s say Polly was first . In my mind Lechmere was most certainly her killer. But the others could be the work of other killers using the mass hysteria over a viscous serial killer to carry out their own violent acts and hoping to pin it on “THE” madman of the day . The double event in my mind is hugely important because while some argue Jack was interrupted with victim 1 that night I think it’s possible she wasn’t a Jack victim at all but the work of someone else . Then to say he suddenly appeared elsewhere still wanting blood to me is a stretch. And with Mary Kelly her murder doesn’t fit with the others . It was done inside not outside and the amount of mutilation to me indicates it was a crime of passion a deeply personal crime . I’m not saying it’s impossible but I just don’t think some random person who have done that to another . My money is on Mary’s boyfriend at the time . But of course others argue she was his “masterpiece” a culmination of his sickest desires and once he was done he was done but to me that’s ridiculous. Serial killers don’t stop at least not forever unless they die or are caught . To suggest he stopped with 5 is laughable. If in fact there was a single killer to me there had to be other victims before Polly like Martha and after Mary who he could have killed . There are other ripper like murders that occurred in America suggesting he could have taken his act abroad . Lechmere himself lived a good long life if he was in fact Jack he likely had many other victims the police did not want to pin on Jack so that the hysteria would fade . Whatever the truth Lechmere, A different Jack or no Jack at all. Or 5 London murder victims , many other London victims or an international serial killer . I don’t think the mystery is ever going anywhere .
White chapel at the time was hell and full of a lot of seedy and disturbed people. It is most definitely possible there were multiple killers in the area either just doing their thing or using the cover of the Jack story to commit their crimes and hope the police pinned it on the boogy man. But it’s also possible there was one lone crazed psycho . I don’t think we will ever know for sure
Possible theory
@missyrose didn't the cops or news paper say that there was 11 woman who were killed before the other 5 woman?
I’ve never heard the theory of no Jack the Ripper and as Spock would say I found it “fascinating” reading. As you know, today we call it “copy-cat”. I don’t know if I would go so far as to say “mass hysteria” BUT I would find some agreement with copy cat. Never even considered it. I’m not saying that, that’s what was, but WELL written and well thought out, bravo!
Sarah Bax Horton, who is a relative to an officer who conducted the original investigation, claims a man named Hyam Hyams fits the description
You started out with Lechmere which tells me you have not studied this at all, but instead are a current day trendy and mindless follower of what is the current claim. Yeah, in other words stop lying! You know NOTHING about this and basically watched two documentaries. 😮
A lot that is believed about Jack is fallacy, as for starters, the cuts while neat was nowhere near surgical in precision.
How are you so familiar with the quality of the cuts??
Exactly, more like a butcher or a meat cart delivery driver.
@@walkawaycat431 - Yeah. A meat delivery driver called Charles, probably.
The House of Lechmere is a pretty good series of videos making a really good case against the man.
Thank you!
I just love the instrumental music😅..anyways about this jack guy,he definitely took the cake when it comes to murders😮
@35:58 Surely not every theory has to be a "Conspiracy" ?
Jack was the guy who made deliveries from the butcher shop late at night
What about one of prince of great britain could have been jack the ripper 🎉🎉🎉
Do you mean Lechmere? I think he is the one too
Thoughty I see.
@@Afrosom38 couldn't have been. Jack had to be a weak pathetic old inadequate male. He probably was impotent, verbally castrated by his wife, probably had all daughters and most likely relied on his mother. I say this because a strong man doesn't need to attack the weakest amongst society. I don't think their being prostitutes had anything to do with it other than they were ready pickings. I think he was disgusted by the drink probably negate he had problems with the drink and was either disgusted by it or proving to himself the drink didn't effect him. Many a prostitute went unharmed. He only attacked the one so drink they held onto the wall as they walked. He was weak. He attacked from drink women because he wasn't man enough to attack a male or a sober woman. Also, let us not forget even wealthy elite women sold sex in those days. Prostitutes weren't looked down upon as they are today. Actors were thought of as more disgusting than Prostitutes. Also, the way the women were killed is exactly how one would kosher kill and field dress am animal. Cut the throat and bleed out, cut from taint to sternum, remove organs intact so the meat cools quickly and doesn't spoil. This was all done by weak pathetic inadequate male who needed his mommy more often than not. When he and his wife made up he would have stopped killing because he wasn't able to kill anyone that wasn't falling down drunk or helpless a child or elderly. He was weak not stupid. He wouldn't have wanted to get caught. He would have been afraid his mommy would get mad at him and stop giving him money or shelter.
Look for a weak, pathetic, liar, with possibly all daughters, fought with a wife or lost his wife. Lived of and on with his mother. Relied on women for house and home. Had issues with the drink. Older and weak. So weak he had to kill in the dark from behind because he didn't even have the balls to be seen by his victims. Not weak physically but weak mentally and emotionally. Like a rapist who believes themselves dominant for sa the weakest amongst society. Doing that is like saying stomping on an ant makes them Hercules. It doesn't. They are weak and pathetic.
@@kcrowe559ya they must be referrering to Lechmere he delivered meat and was also placed at the scene of the 2nd killing when he was standing over the body when another person came down the street. and he even lied to the police. then showed up at the inquest and lied about his real name and address. also, every one of the other murders also happened to be along the routes he took to and from work or in areas near where he was familiar with. and all within the same time frames he would of been near any of the areas.. It was definitely him or hes the most unlucky guy to of been at or near every killing and within minutes of them all. and the odds of it all just being a big coincidence would be astronomical
The people that lived in the room after Kelly said there was still dried blood on the walls and floor and bed frame.
From Jack the Ripper to Billy the Kid by Henry wall.
I think it was the doctor that was in the high society the removal of their organs also perfect incisions.
Nonsense
Not a Dr - An anatomy student? Or a hog or cow butcher . . . I guess I don't think it was a young person - like college age - I think someone male over the age of 37 and literate with a skill in cutting . . .plus he had some kind of mental illness . . .
There was more than five murders and honestly that part of london was so crowded so much crime. How do we really know the ripper was not disturbed unterrupted during all the crimes. But the important clue is there was more than 5 murders
There's another serial killer know as Jack thr Stripper
Some Ripperologists even think that "Jack" the Ripper may have been a woman.
Jack The Ripper could've been in the butcher or medical business (maybe a medical student) 🤔 it's seems like we will never know 😔 but it could be a woman also 🤔
There are some that strongly feel that Jack the Ripper worked in one of the slaughterhouses on the East side. Dr. Andrew Knight has a great article that explains in great detail why he feels it was a slaughterhouse worker. The victims were cut in the same technique as slaughterhouse workers, not like a surgeon. The article is titled "New Jack the Ripper theory links meat works and sexual violence" Very convincing theory.
“He literally ripped.” Ffs, in the first sentence. No, he used a cutting implement
Yo Fred Dinenage you are the best ever..... I love your voice.... You are the best Narrator of all Narrator.... Don't drop of the scene.
Donald Rumbelow and Martin Fido have the Real deal on the Ripper..😑😑
And many more but those 2 are fabulous
"which to this day remain unsolved". QC James Scobie might disagree. Charles Cross/Charles Lechmere was more than just an "innocent" founder of body of Polly Nichols. Excellent starting point into the topic is YT documentary "JTR Missing Evidence" while YT channel "The House of Lechmere" provides additional excellent material for free. Christer Holmgren (featuring prominently in the "Missing Evidence " documentary) has also written a book "Cutting Point".
Firstly, there is No evidence let alone Proof, that Cross is Lechmere. The fact of the matter is - no killer, let alone a Knife killer, would approach a witness who has Seen him now, then walks away chatting with him & then makes himself Known to the Cops. Then, continues skulking around the streets in the early morning hours when Many people know he was on the scene of that victim & he is Known to More of the cops because he did go to the inquest. Even if Cross is actually Lechmere, who lived in Whitechapel his whole life & worked at Pickfords for over 20 years, then he is Well Known to loads of locals & work colleagues & as a carman, also business associates. A couple of Morons make a doc & fooltube videos putting about that - he continued walking the streets in the black early morning hours for Weeks & carried on approaching prostitutes In Front of people & did the killings with the same & much worse MO. And people are drinking the Kool aid no matter the lunacy of the ‘reasoning’ behind the blather.
George Lusk, not Joseph. Chairman of the Vigilance Committee.
Jack was completely out of line...
He was roguish, for sure. Quite the rascal.
@@renejean2523 Saucy, even
Fred Dinagases voice, always helps me to sleep 😍
He's like Alan Partridge
Patricia Cornwell wrote an interesting book presenting the artist, Walter Sickert, as being the murderer. I too think From Hell with Johnny Depp was interesting, but Ms Cornwell's research and forensic background lend credence to her profile.
Sickert is thought to have been in France at the time of the murders.
@@otisdylan9532 Ms. Cornwell addresses that in her book.
@@raydavison4288 My understanding is that she addresses it by saying that he could have kept going back and forth between France and England to commit the murders, without providing any evidence that he ever actually was in England at the time. Everything she says needs to be checked with the best sources, because she often gets the facts wrong.
@@otisdylan9532 Have you read the book?
@@raydavison4288 No I haven't. If you think I'm mistaken, then what's your understanding of how Cornwell justifies the idea that Sickert was in London when the murders occurred?
HH Holmes was thought to be the actual Ripper the killings stopped because he went back to his Castle of Horrors in Chicago.
If the police man who found Catherine Eddowes had been what 5 minutes early, he probably would’ve stumbled upon the murder as it was happening.
Jack was almost caught but escaped with only a few minutes to spare several times. LEMMINO has made a much more detailed video on Jack the Ripper and his murders.
Thats why I keep thinking about it being a cop. But how? How would a cop be able to keep the blood off his clothes? idk. the whole thing is insane
"If the police man who found Catherine Eddowes had been what 5 minutes early, he probably would’ve stumbled upon the murder as it was happening. " If PC Neil had arrived at the scene of murder of Polly Nichols in Buck's Row 5 minutes later, we probably wouldn't have Jack the Ripper story.
The best documentary on JTR is "The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper" on the Smithsonian channel. The best suspect you'll ever see.
@@buschovski1I've considered the same thing........possibly a cop!
@@buschovski1 well the killings were in the middle of the night in poor area without street lights, if he was wearing dark clothing you probably wouldnt notice someone is bloody
moniker ..fe rdee? Some wonder if there was something special with Elizabeth Stride in the case, some sort of warped "reverence" (compared to what happened to the other victims)
Charles Lechmere is the top suspect
Ok so, the idea that he was insane by legal definition and would have been committed to an asylum doesn't jell with modern serial killers. Gacy, Dahmer, Dennis Ryder, Bundy, Gien, and a host of others. I don't think we can say, because a person was committed and is labeled insane that it's evidence of guilt. Also, most recent serial killers don't have a history of violence except Gacy. I'd like to explore the theory that a constable may have been "Leather Apron". Any constable with a history as a butcher or military surgical aid at the time? One that was reported to be abusive to the Whitechapel ladies of the night? One that may have been off duty each night a murder was committed? Who may have died at the time the killings ended? Any fit that profile?
I've always wondered if Jack the Ripper moved to Europe or America to continue his crimes.
Then Francis Tumblety might be the most interesting suspect for you
@@martinolsen660 Another American suspect that got a lot of attention recently was H.H. Holmes aka Mudgett. His modus operandi, however, was entirely different from the Whitechapel Murderer's. Tumblety, on the other hand, was a favourite suspect of ripperologist Stuart Evans.
@@martinolsen660 quite right. Many Ripperologists believe he was their prime suspect. Anyone who keeps jars of uteruses and shows them to company has got to be considered a strong candidate for Jack the Ripper.
As do I
@terribolton2323 Not the respected Ripperolists. The prime suspect among the most respected Ripperolists is Charles Allen Lechmere. Christer Holmgren, Edward Stow, Richard Jones, and Derek Osborne all believe Lechmere is the JTR. Watch "The Missing evidence: Jack the Ripper" on the Smithsonian channel. Can't believe people still haven't heard of this documentary or suspect. I can't take this documentary seriously. Watch what I recommended, and you'll see. You can thank me later 😁
I would like to see a movie of Jack the Ripper.
I don’t know if they’ve ever done one that was really that good? “From Hell” was lame and that was big budget.m
@@TheIndependentLens I've seen you before on JTR videos. Charles Allen Lechmere is the best suspect by far.
@@walkawaycat431 no, and quit stalking me like a weirdo.
@@TheIndependentLens You're delusional 😂
@@Jojo-vo4cu nope! You have zero knowledge of this.
If CNN had been around back then, they would have blamed Trump.
Boy oh boy.....you hit the nail on the head!!!!!!!!
😂😂😂
And he probably would have been guilty too
@@julianakleijn9254 No. He would have been innocent. But CNN and the dim-witted people who suffer TDS wouldn't care. Innocent people being killed is not a problem for them. They support it.
lies, Jack was not a fat orange scumbag!
I personally dont think Stride was a Ripper Victim...
so do i. i also think elizabeth jackson and martha tabram were also ripper victims
Charles Lechmere was Jack the Ripper
Hello! Yes, CAL was Jack the Ripper.
@@walkawaycat431 Hi, definately! All the evidence points to him!
Firstly, there is No evidence let alone Proof, that Cross is Lechmere. The fact of the matter is - no killer, let alone a Knife killer, would approach a witness who has Seen him now, then walks away chatting with him & then makes himself Known to the Cops. Then, continues skulking around the streets in the early morning hours when Many people know he was on the scene of that victim & he is Known to More of the cops because he did go to the inquest. Even if Cross is actually Lechmere, who lived in Whitechapel his whole life & worked at Pickfords for over 20 years, then he is Well Known to loads of locals & work colleagues & as a carman, also business associates. A couple of Morons make a doc & fooltube videos putting about that - he continued walking the streets in the black early morning hours for Weeks & carried on approaching prostitutes In Front of people & did the killings with the same & much worse MO. And people are drinking the Kool aid no matter the lunacy of the ‘reasoning’ behind the blather.
Hi Sir you were part of the team of HOW regards David MARTIN
Jack the ripper is Charles Lechmere or Charles Allen Cross who discovered Polly Nichols
Firstly, there is No evidence let alone Proof, that Cross is Lechmere. The fact of the matter is - no killer, let alone a Knife killer, would approach a witness who has Seen him now, then walks away chatting with him & then makes himself Known to the Cops. Then, continues skulking around the streets in the early morning hours when Many people know he was on the scene of that victim & he is Known to More of the cops because he did go to the inquest. Even if Cross is actually Lechmere, who lived in Whitechapel his whole life & worked at Pickfords for over 20 years, then he is Well Known to loads of locals & work colleagues & as a carman, also business associates. A couple of Morons make a doc & fooltube videos putting about that - he continued walking the streets in the black early morning hours for Weeks & carried on approaching prostitutes In Front of people & did the killings with the same & much worse MO. And people are drinking the Kool aid no matter the lunacy of the ‘reasoning’ behind the blather.
I'm from London and live close to the sites of the ripper
This suggestion may not land well with some folk, but it's my belief that Jack might actually be a Jill. Everyone from the beginning has been looking for a man and coming up empty with loads of wild theories. Just think about it a little. Who knows?
It doesn't land well because it's a dumb theory with nothing backing it other than "hey, maybe."
Matter of fact, it's contradictory to the gruesomeness of the evidence. How many female butchers do you know with the strength to remove human ligature in the middle of the night, quickly?
Don't think so. That type of violence and precise motor skill is more consistent with a man. Now women are capable of being just as cruel. But the methodology usually involves the use of proxy or poisons .
They found out who it was already.
No, "they" didn't lol
@@okiguess8103 yes They did.
@@SubRosa33 who did and who was Jack the ripper, because strangely, this case is classified as unresolved all over the internet. So I'm sorry if I'm doubtful. But I'm sure you have a great explanation
@@okiguess8103 look up DNA analysis of semen and blood from the scarf of one of the victims forgot which one.
Charles lechmere is the only one looking good so far
No, it obviously wasn’t Lechmere. 🙄
Not really no
I think it was Lechmere but that he was only responsible for 3 of the canonical victims and maybe Tabram.
@@katrinamoran1209 Firstly, there is No evidence let alone Proof, that Cross is Lechmere. The fact of the matter is - no killer, let alone a Knife killer, would approach a witness who has Seen him now, then walks away chatting with him & then makes himself Known to the Cops. Then, continues skulking around the streets in the early morning hours when Many people know he was on the scene of that victim & he is Known to More of the cops because he did go to the inquest. Even if Cross is actually Lechmere, who lived in Whitechapel his whole life & worked at Pickfords for over 20 years, then he is Well Known to loads of locals & work colleagues & as a carman, also business associates. A couple of Morons make a doc & fooltube videos putting about that - he continued walking the streets in the black early morning hours for Weeks & carried on approaching prostitutes In Front of people & did the killings with the same & much worse MO. And people are drinking the Kool aid no matter the lunacy of the ‘reasoning’ behind the blather.
Even here in Belize central America as young boys we were always told stories about Jack the ripper
Your country used to be called british honduras til 1973
@@davidhallett8783that’s because in 1973 “The Exorcist” came out and changed that.
They should make them pick a suspect not say i dunno im with the Lechmere train at the moment
It was the cat meat man imo
I’m sure he killed more 😮
I think so too. Especially since he was never caught. Your average serial killer doesn't start killing like that, kill only 5 people and then just stop for no reason. My theory is that the police had in one way or another obtained the evidence to catch him, despite them not realizing who he was at the but he KNEW they were on him and he ended up moving out of the area before they could directly and conclusively identify him. I'm even willing to say that he may very well have left England altogether to make ABSOLUTELY sure he wouldn't be caught. If he did go to another country and continued his murders it's also a very good possibility he probably would have made certain changes to his MO in the off chance that if he kept it then a connection could possibly have been made to his English victims. I STRONGLY think he had MANY MORE victims than just the 5 though because again your average killer doesn't do what he did, and only kill a few people. Usually if someone starts killing like that they keep killing until they're forced to stop they're not going to stop just to stop.
What are you people talking about?
Women thrown out in the streets?.
One of them was a houskeeper, cought stealing. The other one was reciving 10 shillings, but her man died. Fu.
To me, the main reason the killer was never identified is, there was more than 1 killer. Everyone is getting hung up on the fact they think it's 1 killer escalating his kills.
Agreed. I think Barnett killed Mary Kelly, but not the others. And I think someone else killed Elizabeth Stride. But I think the same person is responsible for the other 3 canonical victims and maybe Martha Tabram.
It was 19th century England, not modern day America! There were murders, yes, but not brutal murders like the ones attributed to Jack the Ripper. The idea that there were multiple murderers carving up prostitutes, disfiguring their faces, hacking their genitals, and stealing their organs - in the one place, at the same time - is preposterous. There was a reason the crimes became so famous, and even had Queen Victoria getting involved. They weren't your normal, run of the mill murders...
Having said all that, it could be that Stride was murdered by someone else and wasn't part of the "double event", but that's not a unique idea; anyone with a knowledge of the cases agrees with that.
He has been identified
Sarah Bax Horton, who is a relative to an officer who conducted the original investigation, claims a man named Hyam Hyams
Unfortunately unless there is some DNA this will never be considered solved,. 👀
It was Charles lechmere the first ' jack the ripper ' In 1888
I believe it was George Hutchinson
Awesome program magic
I’ve watched so many vids about this…. Could it be that in Whitechapel back then, was a restricted area do to the fact many people had syphilis? In his mind, Jack the ripper probably got this illness from one of these women, by having sex with them in the past, then he discovered his illness, then, he got petrified, angry and blamed those women not only that, he decided to kill them all. In his mind obviously they deserved to die and they were prostitutes. According to other videos I’ve watched, he would from behind cut their throats to avoid conflict with them. Also he would commit those murders only on the weekends, Fridays, Saturdays and Sundays. That tells me that he had a job from Monday to Friday. I find it fascinating that after all this time this case is unsolved, coz nobody knows who Jack was, how strange, is a peculiarity Could it be?. He got away with it? Who has all that time in those days, to kill a person in such manner? Who has such precision to do such atrocious physical cuts? Is this fair? After all this time nobody knows who ¨Jack¨ was/is, all these women did not deserved to be murdered.
Good theory!!!
There was a serial killer in Rochester ny in the early 90s who killed prostitutes. It had to take someone with skill because it was done in the dark
Aaron Kosminski, Jewish barber, did it all.
Kosminski, either in age or build, does not fit the eyewitness sightings of the Ripper. Kosminski was at liberty for nearly two years after the murder of Mary Kelly, so why did he stop killing? There is also no evidence he possessed any anatomical knowledge or had violent, suicidal or homicidal tendencies, and was not considered a danger to other people.
your mom did it all
Why?
@@MrDevious239 I don't know why but it's been proven through modern DNA analysis.
@@Tomatohater64 through the letters he didnt wrote!
We will never know who he was.
Charles Allen Lechmere.
I still think the painter Robert Sickerd (pretty sure not spelling his last name right) was Jack. When he came to America the murders stopped plus his paitings were very close to looking like the muders. This is purely my opinion.
Walter Sickert
Patricia Cornwell wrote a book on who she thought was JTR. Compelling evidence.@@lauravanzilen8599
this case may still be able to be solved yes it will be hard to do BUT the man i know was the ripper left London in 1891 if we can find where he went we should be able to find more murders once thats done if we can link him to any new murders its should be enough to show in a court and to the world he was the ripper. I have been studying serial murder for years and when i looked into this case i had not read anything on this case but i knew i needed to use todays tools to find the ripper and that just what i did he was not that hard to find because of what i have learned. i looked at all the suspects and this man is the only man who fit in everyway to what we know as a lust killer on top of that he was the right age lived in the middle of the murders and involved himself in the case with a statement he was scared into making. had a woman named Sara Lewis not seen him and told police we would never hear of this man. after hear he was seen he went to police with his statement that was three days after the murder and Inquest. I saw in his Statement his Ego was huge and shined bright as he told his tail. this mans name was George Hutchinson he was a friend of Mary Kelly and saw and talked to her the night he killed her. One of the things we see with this type of killer is they kill strangers but if they kill a known person they will cover the face and body and sometimes destroy it there were two victims this happened to Mary Kelly and Kate Eddowes and he knew them both. there is lots more that tie him to these murders i found but its long to go into it here. I am not doing this to make money or write a book i am doing it for the victims and their families as i am sick of seeing the rats of this world make money off victims. there are police that also know this man is the killer but they would rather keep the case going so they and others can make money. You people can believe who you want but the man Known as Jack the ripper was George Hutchinson.
It's a bloody world bloody just bloody
How bloody, buddy?
funny how these killers become legend remebered....why do we glorify these killers? it literally is what fills them it like sure u get killed or caught at some point but ull be remember where the victims wont pass the family
Hello everyone from mobile Alabama USA how is everyone doing
It was Paul Joseph Watson’s great grandfather
Hello lovely, doing just great up here in Detroit Michigan, how are you??🌹
Maybe he passed away...i mean committing murder in 1888...that's a long time ago .
Is there any chance for dna material left?
Such a polite murderer signing the letter Yours truly
Yeah. And 'Dear Boss...' Respectful. I like that.