@@N8tiv3SonBíkéh all throughout my life (72 now), i have been the VICTIM of policemen breaking the law. The truly sad part ? NO ONE gives a rat's rectum as it is not happening to THEM ! Since they are COWARDS and will NEVER stand up for OUR rights, it doesn't matter
Society is geared towards right and wrong being defined by laws! One fact should stand out for everyone! If you can't afford a good lawyer you have no rights!
One of the big issues is that most lawyers won't get that deep into the facts of a case. Unless of course they're a wealthy client like yours. So they will take their fees to retain their services, and then trade plea deals with the DA like they're pokémon cards. And innocent people end up having to make a decision to go to court with a lawyer who won't fight for them because they don't have the money, or they take a plea deal for a couple years versus facing 10 to 15.
You need to take the 7 Step YATTAFI TECHNIQUE of INNOCENCE to learn how to disrupt the process of a cop trying to develop probable cause to arrest you. Learn the tricks, tactics & techniques they learn to use against YOU.
This exact thing happened to me. The police report was at best 50% accurate. It painted me in the worst way possibly. So i tried to fight the charge and ended up in even more trouble than if i hadnt tried to fight the original charge. The public defenders suggestion actually cost me more.
I was the guy who contacted you with the case in Port Charlotte that moved back to St Louis. Huge fan. I've been following your TH-cam channel. I love your videos and the informative information that you give. I can tell that you really love what you do and truly admire your character. It's so reassuring to see an attorney like yourself who truly loves his job and wants to help his clients! Thank you for all that you do!
Unfortunately the police reports are important and can ruin your career even though the officer is training for 8 weeks or less. I can’t be in a building with the Police officers because they write false reports based on false reports based off a false report. It never ends. They are murdering a cripple.
Excellent. thank you. They arrested me for failure to appear while I did appear except I did not hear my name called. I even asked the Judge his name and he answered. Why didnt they check before they arrested me? That is a false arrest is it not?
My name is Miguel Garcia and Unfortunately I was accused by my daughter and my sister in law of bruising my wife of 45 years and only person in my life. There a lot of money interest for them. Well my daughter called the police they took her to the hospital and the police arrested me and said that my wife wrote a report amusing me of all sorts of things and I simply told the police officer that it's not true my daughter knows how much I love her and then I told the officer and my wife can not speak or write a report she has dementia and he stop for a moment and said well she wrote the report and she gave it to me and you know what happened after that
Im not an attorney, but it's probably a good idea to do these videos when you're not driving. Any accident happening due to distracted driving plus being recorded by you will be used against you in a court of law. Thanks for this information though.
All mounted on dash. Safe and legal to my knowledge. Like talking to a friend in the car. I could mount it from passenger side I guess. I would never want to cause an accident.
If you haven't passed the bar you don't get to school a guy who did on any aspect of law 😂 im sorry this was just plain cringy to read. He's fine I'm pretty sure screaming kids in the back seat or eating a huge sandwich while driving would also qualify as a distraction but you don't see people booting their kids or going hungry lmao
@TitanicExpert01 The Brady list is a list of law enforcement officials with known credibility issues. If prosecutors intend to use somebody on The Brady list to testify in a case, they have to notify the defense. As a result prosecutors usually will not use a Brady list officer, and will throw out a case, if a Brady officer is the primary witness.
@@rockymntnliberty I learned something new Today. I got screwed by several crooked ass 🐷 and still try to obtain legal knowledge. Thanks for your reply.
Question for you, in the State of Florida, does a probable cause affidavit have to be NOTARIZED? If it is what they have used to make their arrest? Affidavits are suppose to be sworn testimates of truth & verified that the person writing & signing it are truly said person. A Probable Cause Affidavit I WOULD think ABSOLUTELY would need to be since it is essentially acting as their "temporary warrant," so to speak. Even if a Superior officer "attests" to it, how does one know he isnt just going along with what Officer Joe SAID happene. Of course he is going to collaborate his buddies story. Where as if it is notarized then they LEGALLY are committing purgery & they would be doing it with malfeasance. Ive found conflicting answers so was hoping maybe you could give me a definitive answer please & thank you sir.
An arrest affidavit or probable cause affidavit is sworn to by the law enforcement officer under the penalty of perjury. Thus, an affidavit need not be notarized. See Baysa v. Gualtieri, et., al…
If a criminal investigator fails to include a witness statement because it helps the person arrested can there be anything done? In the report he said the person didn't witness anything but at the preliminary hearing he was asked three times were there any witnesses? First time & Second time he says No. The last time he says well I think the wife may have witnessed something.
Sounds like there is another witness. Use an investigator and find them. Talk to your attorney. The cops are there to convict you not help you. You have been arrested so you are the bad guy. Use their sloppy investigation to your advantage. That’s what’s wonderful about cross examination. Your attorney gets the opportunity to show the court and all in it how incompetent they are. Or hype them up when it’s helps your defense.
That’s exactly why the reports have to be rigorously vetted and impeached by an independent investigation. Often they contain material errors of fact. This is true of traffic tickets or felony complaints.
I have a probable cause statement signed under penalty of perjury by an arresting officer. It states what happened (supposedly) at the scene but with no real way to tell if any of what was… Said on it to be truth. So now I’m wondering how to expose it as lies. Is it possible to impeach… The officer somehow from their false statements? Ty
I have a huge question, can a cop report you to court with not enough evidence over an audio identity fraud? Also if the cop already reported you the court house takes over they send you the letter and evelope from the courthouse but what if you received the letter from the police station is that like the cop involved into something or what. Because usually I heard that cops don’t get themselves involved into audios unless it’s enough evidence and a threat or something but for a drama they don’t get themselves involved. I just need someone to confirm….???
I've been accused of shoting into an occupied vehicle and offered a deal I declined 5yrs of probation because 1 I'm innocent 2 no evidence of a crime 3 no evidence of w crime what so ever , 4 cop who made report wasn't on scene 5 listed my car as green honda pilot I drive a black Honda crv but I got a dumbass discount court appointed idiot so it's going to trial with no fking proff of a crime
Remember, it's all about the money. The more the government/ state makes there's raises. Then every hour of court is overtime for the police. All about money.
There is a fee/debt/"charge" issued for each crime. If a person is convicted & the JUDGE sentences the person to prison, 82% of the TOTAL of the "charges" goes directly into their retirement fund/ per person they send to prison. Hummmm, let that simmer for a second. How unbiased & impartial do you think that makes alot of them? Do you think the "judges" in our system are giving WeThe People access to a fair trial? Why does the State(who REMEMBER, Constitutionally, anyone accused of a crime has the RIGHT to face their accuser. If their is no victim, how is THE STATE the injured party. Ever seen THE STATE cross examined....ijs) There is a reason PD's & The State come to a plea agreement so readily! If it goes to trial, the CONTROL is now out of their hands. It isn't that woooohoooo, some magical deal was worked out & we the people should be oh so thankful, for the "gift of leniency" they are giving us. It's a scare tactic, saying this is the best you're going to get, you better take it. That way money still lines the State & the judges pockets. If it goes to trial by jury, well, then the run the risk of REALLY loosing. The States Atty & a PD are BOTH EMPLOYED by the STATE. Bit of conflict of interest there if ya think about it. In ANY ARREST & Trial, systemically so many of our Constitional Rights are broken, it is beyond infuriating. Educate yourself, We The People have been railroaded & ran over for so long that MOST have not a clue what our RIGHTS even are anymore. Look up Mulberry vs Madison. Jurisdiction is the ONE thing that can be CHALLENGED @ anytime, theres a REASON, LOOK AT THE CASE ABOVE! It's time we start taking our Rights back & holding them accountable! If we don't start educating ourselves & holding them accountable the corruption of the system will only continue to perpetuate.
So Roger Wana, hear about tunnel vision? K, a long time ago in a single car wreck, where the inebriated captain of the land cruiser left the right of way and rolled the car, five people got out and then traveled south to complete their journey. Now, me b'n an after-market observer had loaned one of the wreck-ies a flash light to look for phones. K, all five of the drunk land sailors started walking south. So, as I had went back into my abode to get a shot or two of whiskey and then re-appeared at the crash site while looking for the flash light I had loaned I noticed the cops intently observing me. This is when I exclaimed, "No,no, I din't do this, no those people are walking that way," while I pointed south. And, it took these fine men a few seconds to clear their fughed brains of what I had told them they then realized that the people walking south had been in the rollover. And, then they jumped in their cars and mashed those motors to investigate. Now I'm not flaming or bashing anyone about this interaction, but them Boyz were deciding to get me, and I had to set them back on the narrow path. Yeah, I've seen this tunnel vision, and I know there is mostly nothing that can be done about it ATM unless you actually can get through to the ones burrowing. Now, here is a tepid aftermath: The guy who owns the land that I rent, why he had his drivers license revoked because the Oregon DMV thinks he was the second driver in a single car accident. Funny thing, because it isn't happening to me, is tunnel vision, actually is pervasive to every thing human.
Reading documents on police history, this was NOT ALWAYS the case of writing a report to convict. There were one or two honorable Chief's of Police in 1954 that wrote " accurate and fair reports"
I trust you got costs awarded for your client against cop and prosecutor, and cop was charged and convicted of perjury, cop was sacked and barred from working in law enforcement; prosecutor was sacked and disbarred for presenting misleading police report knowing it contained lies.
@@MF-ty2zn1 I'm sure William was being sarcastic to make a point. (A valid point.) Unfortunately, you can't get reimbursement for attorneys fees even in civil cases, except in certain limited situations. The U.S. legal system favors the wealthy and the police (and the government in general).
@Milesco you can however ask that each bond created for the case be returned to you. There are at LEAST 3 for each case that she created & traded on the stock market daily! All prosecutors are required to bring a checkbook with them to court!
Just because your not charged nor its not a statute does not meant that it shouldnt be...Dash Mounted Camera's probably are legal but your shooting a TH-cam video and I can see how that distraction could be dangerousand driving with undue care and attention...I am sure if I was a cop pulling you over I could qoute a statute...
If a baggie of drugs is claimed to have been thrown to the ground by a bearhanded, handcuffed defendent, it is expected that that evidence would be preserved and tested for dna or fingerprints. If not, that raises reasonable doubt if there is no reliable eyewitness testimony. In this era of police bodycams, it is expected that this evidence would likely be on video. If not, then there's reasonable doubt. Evidence not preserved or reasonably tested = reasonable doubt.
I will share this knowledge for others to see and understand your perspective as to why it IS imperative to be accurate, concise, detailed versus when an officer writes half ass and how they can look like a buffoon on the stand, because if I was in your shoes, defending my client, it would be to exploit how the state failed to prove the elements to the offense was not reasonable.
Sue his ass for falsifying the police report and call the DOJ civil rights division. Have them investigate what happened between you and the police officer. Police can be charged for crimes under 18 u.s.c 241 & 242 and other federal statutes… I’m no lawyer (at least not yet) but in my experiences with sheriff deputies, SAO, lawyers, and state and federal judges… I’m no one to be fucked with when it comes to constitutional law, specifically Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Also, educate yourself on Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. You can easily find it online. Lastly, don’t let the government officials bully you as if you don’t or show them that you’re buying into their intimidation tactics, they’ll not only respect you but also fear you.
overcome? police reports cant be used as evidence in my state, that would allow the guberment to print any amount of evidence against defendants they want...
You missed the point. While you’re correct that the police report itself isn’t admissible as evidence, the officer will often testify based on the details he recorded in that report. When people read the report, they can feel overwhelmed or helpless, believing it to be an unshakable account of events. However, effective cross-examination can reveal the true value of that testimony by exposing its weaknesses. Through strategic questioning, you can highlight inconsistencies, gaps, or inaccuracies in the officer’s recollection, or show any biases in how the report was written. The goal is to challenge the officer’s credibility, making it clear that the testimony isn’t as solid as it first seems. For example, if the report lacks specific details or includes assumptions, cross-examination can bring those issues to light. By questioning the officer’s certainty about the facts, particularly if they’re relying solely on the report, you can weaken their testimony and strengthen the defense’s position.
@@thelawofficesofrogerp.fole7886 well the era of no one trusting the word of the cops is upon us, they can testify but thats not evidence and their testimony in many cases can also be excluded if you have the right lawyer who knows the right paper work to file. there is nothing that makes the officer's word the truth, specially once you ask them if officers are allowed to lie to do their job, whent hey say yes and they have to say yes cause they can legally it taints their word out the gate. the officer cant be a witness to their own detention, witnesses have to be 4rd parties, the state can and do lie all the time, but like i said the right paper work has to be filed. but you are right, cross exam can easily catch them in lies and poke holes in their story, one dude just got off cause 3 officers all worked their stories out together in a closed room, things like that bring down cases all the time and they discovered that and the details through cross exam. also local laws apply, my fl got some messed up ones for sure lol
Bro i had a domestic case that i never could have got convicted of had trial in june of 2022 keep On mind it was a missdemeanor domestic well the one witness they were goin tomuse was my son against me well the Sa realized my son knew the truth an nothing happpened so my ex didnt show and we waited 15 minutes past trial afyer waitng 2 years to go to trial i got my case expilunged they dropped the child endagwrment an child abuse charges an nolle prosse my domestic i paid mynatty 1300 for the expungement it got expunged 2 months later the SA refiled the domestic on me and the day of trial offered me simple battwry an my lawyer the joke he was was saying justbtake it i said nope im innocent long story short they had different witnesses beand new pictures pictures from my ex not from the police taken an i was found guilty and then the went after my expungement an got that put on my record!!! Long story short bro these SA’s just want convictions If your innocent i want you to be confident Inwas becuaseno knew i didnt do a thing but the truth doesnt matter its all who tells the better story at the end!! I pray an wish younthe best my friend
@@ozzycelik3120 police report are hearsay it can't be use against you in criminal case the jury will never see it they need the fake victim to take the stand to even have a shot to get a conviction most lawyers don't tell people this cause they want you take a plea deal it your word against hers they use cops words for credibility with jury some people still stupid enough to believe cops words they lie and basis when it a men against a woman
Correct. But the point of my video is for those that read the police report should not give up. Being arrested and having a record clearly begins prior to what I am discussing. My point of view is to fight a case and prove accuser wrong. Never give up based on what is contained in a report. Comments by Officer or victim in the report are not facts simply allegations.
I have found what you have shared here to be a very good tool to use and share. It is in understanding when people try to document what happened, it can be open to interpretation and perception by everyone involved. I do agree with your part about when law enforcement do not write detailed reports, it allows the defense to ask more questions to create and cast doubt on the State. You have "Mistake of fact" which can be made known in a report because it is not being concealed. We also have body worn camera video footage that may or may have not captured what an Officer describes in their report. The elements of the offense are required for an arrest and if reasonable, the arrest itself may have not been illegal based upon the totality of circumstances,although to write something that an Officer did not witness would make me cringe because I can see how all the reasonable essentials went out the door.
I would expect that an arrest that never lead to a conviction can be expunged from the public record (of course it would still remain in the private record for government officials, such as cops and judges, to see).
Hello Mr. Foley I’d like to ask is it possible to impeach a police officer for false statements… Made and sworn upon (to be true under perjury) for the purposes of making a just probable cause… Arrest? I’d imagine that statement could be used at trial or no? Lastly could we try to remove… Evidence they submitted after the arrest was made due to the false statements made by that officer? I think a motion to suppress evidence would be the proper step but I’m struggling to… See what needs to be done in disproving they based the arrest on facts but only… Someone’s statement. Which obviously isn’t grounds for an arrest. Ty.
Are cops supposed to put in police report that I was suicidal? Because there’s nothing in the report! And they literally told me as they were processing me! I didn’t even know at all! Aren’t they supposed to make sure before arresting the person? They literally had me on watch 30 minutes on and off
Or don't get pulled over for a minor infraction. My report says: plain smell of odor of marijuana in vehicle. they refused to admit anything in the vehicle k9 alerted to the van. search was conducted nothing found. driver later admitted to smoking marijuana yesterday. cited for failing to have headlights on." Can you guess why I was pulled over? Cuffed and stuck in a police car within three minutes of interaction. Nothing on me. Nothing found. They are out of control.
I was charged with assault by motor vehicle . The cop said he saw on surveillance video the rear right tire of my car run over this fake victims foot . I kept asking for the surveillance video , they kept giving me excuses about getting it to me . Eventually the DA said he lost it ? But that he saw the video before he lost it mind u 18 months later of about 20 hearings . He admits he didn’t see any assault on same video he lost prior to losing it . But he can’t testify to it because he lost it . I had it dismissed for Brady violation losing exculpatory evidence . I then wanted to file a law suit against the detective for lying that he saw me running over this fake victim . As the prosecutor impeached him on the record by admitting u can’t see any assault on video . Just a car driving away . From the get go I explained that u can’t assault anyone with a rear right tire ? What am I an acrobat with a car ??? It’s all fake . The dude filed a false police report . Bottom line I was told u can’t sue the cop because the video is now missing and so what if the prosecutor says there was no assault to be seen before he lost ??? Mind u I lost 19 months of my life because this detective opted to lie instead of protecting me from false reporting . What’s your opinion of that ?? As the only reason there was probable cause was because the detective lied that he saw on same surveillance that I ran this faggots foot over same surveillance that the prosecutor later admitted there was nothing of such content to be seen …. Please advise
I wish I knew more about suing city and county over police misconduct. There are mechanisms to do so. You need court transcripts etc but seek out some attorneys that file those lawsuits for their opinions
I will look into it . Do u know if the statue of limitations to sue starts from the date u were charged or from the date your case was dismissed ? Thanks
I will look into it . Do u know if the statue of limitations to sue starts from the date u were charged or from the date your case was dismissed ? Thanks
Would it be 2 or 3 years from date of disposition or date I was charged ? Because the case almost took two years before it was disposed with a prejudice dismissal
I was the guy who contacted you with the case in Port Charlotte that moved back to St Louis. Huge fan. I've been following your TH-cam channel. I love your videos and the informative information that you give. I can tell that you really love what you do and I admire you! It's so reassuring to see an attorney like yourself who truly loves his job and wants to help his clients! Thank you for all that you do!
"When policemen break the law, then there IS no law, only a fight to survive."
Billy Jack
Victim of corruption
Yes sir I say that all the time it's true ❤️
@@N8tiv3SonBíkéh all throughout my life (72 now), i have been the VICTIM of policemen breaking the law. The truly sad part ? NO ONE gives a rat's rectum as it is not happening to THEM ! Since they are COWARDS and will NEVER stand up for OUR rights, it doesn't matter
Society is geared towards right and wrong being defined by laws!
One fact should stand out for everyone! If you can't afford a good lawyer you have no rights!
One of the big issues is that most lawyers won't get that deep into the facts of a case. Unless of course they're a wealthy client like yours. So they will take their fees to retain their services, and then trade plea deals with the DA like they're pokémon cards. And innocent people end up having to make a decision to go to court with a lawyer who won't fight for them because they don't have the money, or they take a plea deal for a couple years versus facing 10 to 15.
You need to take the 7 Step YATTAFI TECHNIQUE of INNOCENCE to learn how to disrupt the process of a cop trying to develop probable cause to arrest you. Learn the tricks, tactics & techniques they learn to use against YOU.
Yattafi?
@@EndeverInc An ACRONYM.
You Are The Target. Aim For Innocence.
No lie! It's ridiculous, justice is not being served to the innocent.
He’s not a lawyer he’s an attorney
Now tell the story from the perspective of a client without deep pockets?
Regardless if you guilty or innocent and the end you mean money to them that’s the purpose of the legal club system.
This exact thing happened to me. The police report was at best 50% accurate. It painted me in the worst way possibly. So i tried to fight the charge and ended up in even more trouble than if i hadnt tried to fight the original charge. The public defenders suggestion actually cost me more.
Did the cop face consequences for perjury? Would be surprised if the answer is other than "No".
I was the guy who contacted you with the case in Port Charlotte that moved back to St Louis.
Huge fan. I've been following your TH-cam channel. I love your videos and the informative information that you give. I can tell that you really love what you do and truly admire your character. It's so reassuring to see an attorney like yourself who truly loves his job and wants to help his clients!
Thank you for all that you do!
Unfortunately the police reports are important and can ruin your career even though the officer is training for 8 weeks or less. I can’t be in a building with the Police officers because they write false reports based on false reports based off a false report. It never ends. They are murdering a cripple.
The good thing is people can video or document many incidents and upload both sides to social media shining a light on slimy corruption
Excellent. thank you. They arrested me for failure to appear while I did appear except I did not hear my name called. I even asked the Judge his name and he answered. Why didnt they check before they arrested me? That is a false arrest is it not?
@@valdanowill absolutely is!!
My name is Miguel Garcia and Unfortunately I was accused by my daughter and my sister in law of bruising my wife of 45 years and only person in my life. There a lot of money interest for them. Well my daughter called the police they took her to the hospital and the police arrested me and said that my wife wrote a report amusing me of all sorts of things and I simply told the police officer that it's not true my daughter knows how much I love her and then I told the officer and my wife can not speak or write a report she has dementia and he stop for a moment and said well she wrote the report and she gave it to me and you know what happened after that
If you are in fl call my office
I lost my my wife in Virginia and now I am going to loose my house live on 37 Cornell Ave Yonkers ny 10705 thank you for responding
I owe you. For todays' lesson. Its a pleasure to listen. I learn this way. : ) God Bless Sir Roger.
Mike Reidy
Pen. FL
Thanks a million!
WOW awesome. You are so right! Thank you for enlightening me!
I enjoy your courtroom experiences!
They also lie and omit evidence on police reports
Pos can add past events to reflect the present which of course is not reality...
And worse
These are gold! You are gold!
to get you to plea as well
just try getting the law for false swearing or perjury enforced in the POLICE STATE OF LOUSYANA
How do you do this? I had a police officer lie on the report that I refused a blood test but I actually asked and they refused ME!
Im not an attorney, but it's probably a good idea to do these videos when you're not driving. Any accident happening due to distracted driving plus being recorded by you will be used against you in a court of law.
Thanks for this information though.
All mounted on dash. Safe and legal to my knowledge. Like talking to a friend in the car. I could mount it from passenger side I guess. I would never want to cause an accident.
If you crash, delete & over-write the video. Problem solved. Cheers!
If you haven't passed the bar you don't get to school a guy who did on any aspect of law 😂 im sorry this was just plain cringy to read. He's fine I'm pretty sure screaming kids in the back seat or eating a huge sandwich while driving would also qualify as a distraction but you don't see people booting their kids or going hungry lmao
I agree, you could find a FAR better time and place to record a video and pay more attention to driving.
Legal yes… but careless!
You are the best bro!!!
Begs the question, how was the actual perpetrator related to the criminal with the badge? And, was this criminal with a badge put on The Brady list?
And charged with perjury?
Brady list ?
@TitanicExpert01
The Brady list is a list of law enforcement officials with known credibility issues. If prosecutors intend to use somebody on The Brady list to testify in a case, they have to notify the defense. As a result prosecutors usually will not use a Brady list officer, and will throw out a case, if a Brady officer is the primary witness.
@@rockymntnliberty I learned something new Today. I got screwed by several crooked ass 🐷 and still try to obtain legal knowledge. Thanks for your reply.
You a real one
Wow Im need you as my lawyer awesome tutorial 👏 video
Question for you, in the State of Florida, does a probable cause affidavit have to be NOTARIZED? If it is what they have used to make their arrest? Affidavits are suppose to be sworn testimates of truth & verified that the person writing & signing it are truly said person. A Probable Cause Affidavit I WOULD think ABSOLUTELY would need to be since it is essentially acting as their "temporary warrant," so to speak. Even if a Superior officer "attests" to it, how does one know he isnt just going along with what Officer Joe SAID happene. Of course he is going to collaborate his buddies story. Where as if it is notarized then they LEGALLY are committing purgery & they would be doing it with malfeasance. Ive found conflicting answers so was hoping maybe you could give me a definitive answer please & thank you sir.
An arrest affidavit or probable cause affidavit is sworn to by the law enforcement officer under the penalty of perjury.
Thus, an affidavit need not be notarized.
See Baysa v. Gualtieri, et., al…
Money talks BS walks
Great video. The lawyer vs cop voice makes me laugh lol
If a criminal investigator fails to include a witness statement because it helps the person arrested can there be anything done? In the report he said the person didn't witness anything but at the preliminary hearing he was asked three times were there any witnesses? First time & Second time he says No. The last time he says well I think the wife may have witnessed something.
Sounds like there is another witness. Use an investigator and find them. Talk to your attorney. The cops are there to convict you not help you. You have been arrested so you are the bad guy. Use their sloppy investigation to your advantage. That’s what’s wonderful about cross examination. Your attorney gets the opportunity to show the court and all in it how incompetent they are. Or hype them up when it’s helps your defense.
@@thelawofficesofrogerp.fole7886Thabk you for answering this
Spot on sir
I lay on pain at night. I don’t sleep.
I appreciate your video
So what you are saying is a report is not an accurate description of what happened, but a narrative with an agenda.
That’s exactly why the reports have to be rigorously vetted and impeached by an independent investigation. Often they contain material errors of fact. This is true of traffic tickets or felony complaints.
I have a probable cause statement signed under penalty of perjury by an arresting officer.
It states what happened (supposedly) at the scene but with no real way to tell if any of what was…
Said on it to be truth. So now I’m wondering how to expose it as lies. Is it possible to impeach…
The officer somehow from their false statements? Ty
I have a huge question, can a cop report you to court with not enough evidence over an audio identity fraud? Also if the cop already reported you the court house takes over they send you the letter and evelope from the courthouse but what if you received the letter from the police station is that like the cop involved into something or what. Because usually I heard that cops don’t get themselves involved into audios unless it’s enough evidence and a threat or something but for a drama they don’t get themselves involved. I just need someone to confirm….???
Why the hell wasn't that officer charged with filing a false report?
I love these videos!
Can u challenge the four corners of the police report?]]))
My GF was sleeping on the couch when a warrant was executed. The police stated she was hiding under blankets on the report
welcome to the world of crazy. a solid defense attorney will sift through it.
Yada yada yada
Can i sue if the police lied and the courts were in on to persecute and send us to prison.
Just got out of prison last year.
In Texas you only have one year /time limit , to file for malicious prosecution.
Charges against me were dismissed 4 months ago.
Says a man driving hands free in a Tesla !!
Don’t have a Tesla.
@@thelawofficesofrogerp.fole7886 oh.. lol, I stand corrected !
I think I might start following you ! I find your video interesting and compelling !
I've been accused of shoting into an occupied vehicle and offered a deal I declined 5yrs of probation because 1 I'm innocent 2 no evidence of a crime 3 no evidence of w crime what so ever , 4 cop who made report wasn't on scene 5 listed my car as green honda pilot I drive a black Honda crv but I got a dumbass discount court appointed idiot so it's going to trial with no fking proff of a crime
There habitual liars
Remember, it's all about the money. The more the government/ state makes there's raises. Then every hour of court is overtime for the police. All about money.
There is a fee/debt/"charge" issued for each crime. If a person is convicted & the JUDGE sentences the person to prison, 82% of the TOTAL of the "charges" goes directly into their retirement fund/ per person they send to prison. Hummmm, let that simmer for a second. How unbiased & impartial do you think that makes alot of them? Do you think the "judges" in our system are giving WeThe People access to a fair trial? Why does the State(who REMEMBER, Constitutionally, anyone accused of a crime has the RIGHT to face their accuser. If their is no victim, how is THE STATE the injured party. Ever seen THE STATE cross examined....ijs) There is a reason PD's & The State come to a plea agreement so readily! If it goes to trial, the CONTROL is now out of their hands. It isn't that woooohoooo, some magical deal was worked out & we the people should be oh so thankful, for the "gift of leniency" they are giving us. It's a scare tactic, saying this is the best you're going to get, you better take it. That way money still lines the State & the judges pockets. If it goes to trial by jury, well, then the run the risk of REALLY loosing. The States Atty & a PD are BOTH EMPLOYED by the STATE. Bit of conflict of interest there if ya think about it. In ANY ARREST & Trial, systemically so many of our Constitional Rights are broken, it is beyond infuriating. Educate yourself, We The People have been railroaded & ran over for so long that MOST have not a clue what our RIGHTS even are anymore. Look up Mulberry vs Madison. Jurisdiction is the ONE thing that can be CHALLENGED @ anytime, theres a REASON, LOOK AT THE CASE ABOVE! It's time we start taking our Rights back & holding them accountable! If we don't start educating ourselves & holding them accountable the corruption of the system will only continue to perpetuate.
The point is we are not the legal name that's fraud to use the legal name
So Roger Wana, hear about tunnel vision? K, a long time ago in a single car wreck, where the inebriated captain of the land cruiser left the right of way and rolled the car, five people got out and then traveled south to complete their journey.
Now, me b'n an after-market observer had loaned one of the wreck-ies a flash light to look for phones. K, all five of the drunk land sailors started walking south.
So, as I had went back into my abode to get a shot or two of whiskey and then re-appeared at the crash site while looking for the flash light I had loaned I noticed the cops intently observing me.
This is when I exclaimed, "No,no, I din't do this, no those people are walking that way," while I pointed south.
And, it took these fine men a few seconds to clear their fughed brains of what I had told them they then realized that the people walking south had been in the rollover. And, then they jumped in their cars and mashed those motors to investigate.
Now I'm not flaming or bashing anyone about this interaction, but them Boyz were deciding to get me, and I had to set them back on the narrow path.
Yeah, I've seen this tunnel vision, and I know there is mostly nothing that can be done about it ATM unless you actually can get through to the ones burrowing.
Now, here is a tepid aftermath: The guy who owns the land that I rent, why he had his drivers license revoked because the Oregon DMV thinks he was the second driver in a single car accident.
Funny thing, because it isn't happening to me, is tunnel vision, actually is pervasive to every thing human.
Reading documents on police history, this was NOT ALWAYS the case of writing a report to convict. There were one or two honorable Chief's of Police in 1954 that wrote " accurate and fair reports"
I need your help. Is this a possibility?
If it’s in Florida it’s possible. That is where I practice.
@thelawofficesofrogerp.fole7886 ahh Okay. I'm in California. Thanks for the reply though
I trust you got costs awarded for your client against cop and prosecutor, and cop was charged and convicted of perjury, cop was sacked and barred from working in law enforcement; prosecutor was sacked and disbarred for presenting misleading police report knowing it contained lies.
Criminal cases don't get attorneys fees. It's a bunch of BS, but only civil cases get that.
@@MF-ty2zn1 I'm sure William was being sarcastic to make a point. (A valid point.)
Unfortunately, you can't get reimbursement for attorneys fees even in civil cases, except in certain limited situations.
The U.S. legal system favors the wealthy and the police (and the government in general).
@Milesco you can however ask that each bond created for the case be returned to you. There are at LEAST 3 for each case that she created & traded on the stock market daily! All prosecutors are required to bring a checkbook with them to court!
@@stayuf What the heck are you talking about???
20 dollars a week is all you get. Dad said.
It all sounds good but I think you should be charged with driving a motor vehicle with out due care and attention...!
what statute is that? Don't I get a warning first? I think dash mounted cameras are legal.
Just because your not charged nor its not a statute does not meant that it shouldnt be...Dash Mounted Camera's probably are legal but your shooting a TH-cam video and I can see how that distraction could be dangerousand driving with undue care and attention...I am sure if I was a cop pulling you over I could qoute a statute...
Dash Camera's legality is not the issue...Guns are legal too but shooting people with them is not...
@@thelawofficesofrogerp.fole7886
If a baggie of drugs is claimed to have been thrown to the ground by a bearhanded, handcuffed defendent, it is expected that that evidence would be preserved and tested for dna or fingerprints. If not, that raises reasonable doubt if there is no reliable eyewitness testimony.
In this era of police bodycams, it is expected that this evidence would likely be on video. If not, then there's reasonable doubt. Evidence not preserved or reasonably tested = reasonable doubt.
You see “saw”? See written word. Written symbol. Written picture.
So according to nick and his cops celebs have to stay inside and stay scared and kanye is somehow just crazy
I will share this knowledge for others to see and understand your perspective as to why it IS imperative to be accurate, concise, detailed versus when an officer writes half ass and how they can look like a buffoon on the stand, because if I was in your shoes, defending my client, it would be to exploit how the state failed to prove the elements to the offense was not reasonable.
The cop falsified my police report.
Sue his ass for falsifying the police report and call the DOJ civil rights division. Have them investigate what happened between you and the police officer.
Police can be charged for crimes under 18 u.s.c 241 & 242 and other federal statutes…
I’m no lawyer (at least not yet) but in my experiences with sheriff deputies, SAO, lawyers, and state and federal judges… I’m no one to be fucked with when it comes to constitutional law, specifically Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Also, educate yourself on Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. You can easily find it online.
Lastly, don’t let the government officials bully you as if you don’t or show them that you’re buying into their intimidation tactics, they’ll not only respect you but also fear you.
what if the officers report is three different stories
That helps your defense
Im pro se and when i had gaven my statement he didnt read me my rights and waited 3 years later to press charges
overcome? police reports cant be used as evidence in my state, that would allow the guberment to print any amount of evidence against defendants they want...
You missed the point. While you’re correct that the police report itself isn’t admissible as evidence, the officer will often testify based on the details he recorded in that report. When people read the report, they can feel overwhelmed or helpless, believing it to be an unshakable account of events. However, effective cross-examination can reveal the true value of that testimony by exposing its weaknesses.
Through strategic questioning, you can highlight inconsistencies, gaps, or inaccuracies in the officer’s recollection, or show any biases in how the report was written. The goal is to challenge the officer’s credibility, making it clear that the testimony isn’t as solid as it first seems. For example, if the report lacks specific details or includes assumptions, cross-examination can bring those issues to light. By questioning the officer’s certainty about the facts, particularly if they’re relying solely on the report, you can weaken their testimony and strengthen the defense’s position.
@@thelawofficesofrogerp.fole7886 well the era of no one trusting the word of the cops is upon us, they can testify but thats not evidence and their testimony in many cases can also be excluded if you have the right lawyer who knows the right paper work to file. there is nothing that makes the officer's word the truth, specially once you ask them if officers are allowed to lie to do their job, whent hey say yes and they have to say yes cause they can legally it taints their word out the gate.
the officer cant be a witness to their own detention, witnesses have to be 4rd parties, the state can and do lie all the time, but like i said the right paper work has to be filed.
but you are right, cross exam can easily catch them in lies and poke holes in their story, one dude just got off cause 3 officers all worked their stories out together in a closed room, things like that bring down cases all the time and they discovered that and the details through cross exam.
also local laws apply, my fl got some messed up ones for sure lol
In my police report the alleged victims never accused me of theft but that’s what I was charged with.
Dont wreck lol 😂
My rape case is going to preliminary hearing. No dna no physical evidence. I don’t feel scared at all. I know I’m going to win this
Police report looks ridiculous tho. It makes me look guilty
Bro i had a domestic case that i never could have got convicted of had trial in june of 2022 keep
On mind it was a missdemeanor domestic well the one witness they were goin tomuse was my son against me well the Sa realized my son knew the truth an nothing happpened so my ex didnt show and we waited 15 minutes past trial afyer waitng 2 years to go to trial i got my case expilunged they dropped the child endagwrment an child abuse charges an nolle prosse my domestic i paid mynatty 1300 for the expungement it got expunged 2 months later the SA refiled the domestic on me and the day of trial offered me simple battwry an my lawyer the joke he was was saying justbtake it i said nope im innocent long story short they had different witnesses beand new pictures pictures from my ex not from the police taken an i was found guilty and then the went after my expungement an got that put on my record!!!
Long story short bro these SA’s just want convictions If your innocent i want you to be confident Inwas becuaseno knew i didnt do a thing but the truth doesnt matter its all who tells the better story at the end!!
I pray an wish younthe best my friend
How did it go?
I have prelim on may 14
@@ozzycelik3120 police report are hearsay it can't be use against you in criminal case the jury will never see it they need the fake victim to take the stand to even have a shot to get a conviction most lawyers don't tell people this cause they want you take a plea deal it your word against hers they use cops words for credibility with jury some people still stupid enough to believe cops words they lie and basis when it a men against a woman
You didn’t mention that your client was booked, and now has an arrest record.
Correct. But the point of my video is for those that read the police report should not give up. Being arrested and having a record clearly begins prior to what I am discussing. My point of view is to fight a case and prove accuser wrong. Never give up based on what is contained in a report. Comments by Officer or victim in the report are not facts simply allegations.
@@thelawofficesofrogerp.fole7886
Why not file for demurrer then SJM?
I have found what you have shared here to be a very good tool to use and share. It is in understanding when people try to document what happened, it can be open to interpretation and perception by everyone involved. I do agree with your part about when law enforcement do not write detailed reports, it allows the defense to ask more questions to create and cast doubt on the State. You have "Mistake of fact" which can be made known in a report because it is not being concealed. We also have body worn camera video footage that may or may have not captured what an Officer describes in their report. The elements of the offense are required for an arrest and if reasonable, the arrest itself may have not been illegal based upon the totality of circumstances,although to write something that an Officer did not witness would make me cringe because I can see how all the reasonable essentials went out the door.
I would expect that an arrest that never lead to a conviction can be expunged from the public record (of course it would still remain in the private record for government officials, such as cops and judges, to see).
Hello Mr. Foley I’d like to ask is it possible to impeach a police officer for false statements…
Made and sworn upon (to be true under perjury) for the purposes of making a just probable cause…
Arrest? I’d imagine that statement could be used at trial or no? Lastly could we try to remove…
Evidence they submitted after the arrest was made due to the false statements made by that officer?
I think a motion to suppress evidence would be the proper step but I’m struggling to…
See what needs to be done in disproving they based the arrest on facts but only…
Someone’s statement. Which obviously isn’t grounds for an arrest. Ty.
Are cops supposed to put in police report that I was suicidal? Because there’s nothing in the report! And they literally told me as they were processing me! I didn’t even know at all! Aren’t they supposed to make sure before arresting the person? They literally had me on watch 30 minutes on and off
❤💖🧡💛💚💙💜🤎🖤🤍👻
See
Ghuzah gacasum geiesum
Once again, showing they don't hire the smartest amongst us to be jackals/police officers!
How to not have jacked up police reports:
Don’t commit terrible crimes
Or don't get pulled over for a minor infraction. My report says:
plain smell of odor of marijuana in vehicle. they refused to admit anything in the vehicle k9 alerted to the van. search was conducted nothing found. driver later admitted to smoking marijuana yesterday. cited for failing to have headlights on."
Can you guess why I was pulled over?
Cuffed and stuck in a police car within three minutes of interaction.
Nothing on me. Nothing found.
They are out of control.
I was charged with assault by motor vehicle .
The cop said he saw on surveillance video the rear right tire of my car run over this fake victims foot .
I kept asking for the surveillance video , they kept giving me excuses about getting it to me . Eventually the DA said he lost it ? But that he saw the video before he lost it mind u 18 months later of about 20 hearings .
He admits he didn’t see any assault on same video he lost prior to losing it . But he can’t testify to it because he lost it .
I had it dismissed for Brady violation losing exculpatory evidence .
I then wanted to file a law suit against the detective for lying that he saw me running over this fake victim . As the prosecutor impeached him on the record by admitting u can’t see any assault on video . Just a car driving away . From the get go I explained that u can’t assault anyone with a rear right tire ? What am I an acrobat with a car ???
It’s all fake . The dude filed a false police report .
Bottom line I was told u can’t sue the cop because the video is now missing and so what if the prosecutor says there was no assault to be seen before he lost ???
Mind u I lost 19 months of my life because this detective opted to lie instead of protecting me from false reporting .
What’s your opinion of that ?? As the only reason there was probable cause was because the detective lied that he saw on same surveillance that I ran this faggots foot over same surveillance that the prosecutor later admitted there was nothing of such content to be seen ….
Please advise
I wish I knew more about suing city and county over police misconduct. There are mechanisms to do so. You need court transcripts etc but seek out some attorneys that file those lawsuits for their opinions
I will look into it . Do u know if the statue of limitations to sue starts from the date u were charged or from the date your case was dismissed ?
Thanks
I will look into it . Do u know if the statue of limitations to sue starts from the date u were charged or from the date your case was dismissed ?
Thanks
@@mikemichael5591 I dont know its either 2 or 3 years but not my area. sorry
Would it be 2 or 3 years from date of disposition or date I was charged ? Because the case almost took two years before it was disposed with a prejudice dismissal
I was the guy who contacted you with the case in Port Charlotte that moved back to St Louis.
Huge fan. I've been following your TH-cam channel. I love your videos and the informative information that you give. I can tell that you really love what you do and I admire you! It's so reassuring to see an attorney like yourself who truly loves his job and wants to help his clients!
Thank you for all that you do!