UFO Disclosure Won’t Happen Unless... Eric Weinstein & Joe Rogan

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ก.พ. 2023
  • Don't miss Eric's first appearance since being on Joe Rogan: • Eric Weinstein: Are Yo...
    Watch the episode on Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/7MDx...
    Check out my Eric Weinstein playlist: • Eric Weinstein (The Po...
     Eric on @joerogan • Eric Weinstein "We May...
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @drbriankeating
    📺 Watch my most popular videos:📺
    Neil Turok • Why Neil Turok Believe...
    Frank Wilczek • Nobel Prizewinner Fran...
    Eric Weinstein vs. Stephen Wolfram • Stephen Wolfram vs. Er...
    Sir Roger Penrose: • Nobel Prize in Physics...
    Noam Chomsky: • Noam Chomsky: Consciou...
    Sabine Hossenfelder: • “I Don’t Care About Yo...
    Avi Loeb: • UFOs & UAPs: The Situa...
    Follow me to ask questions of my guests:
    🏄‍♂️ Twitter: / drbriankeating
    🔔 Subscribe th-cam.com/users/DrBrianKeatin...
    📝 Join my mailing list; just click here briankeating.com/mailing_list
    ✍️ Detailed Blog posts here: briankeating.com/blog.php
    🎙️ Listen on audio-only platforms: briankeating.com/podcast
    A production of imagination.ucsd.edu/
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~
    Please watch: "Neil DeGrasse Tyson: Plays the Race Card!"
    • Neil DeGrasse Tyson Hi...
    ~-~~-~~~-~~-~
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 8K

  • @KinkyJalepeno
    @KinkyJalepeno ปีที่แล้ว +11938

    Fun Fact: Nothing in the universe can break the laws of physics. If something appears to, it just tells us we don't know physics as well as we thought.

    • @bundleofperceptions1397
      @bundleofperceptions1397 ปีที่แล้ว +506

      Or it tells us that appearances can be deceiving.

    • @williamgrierson4133
      @williamgrierson4133 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      Facts

    • @steveaustin2716
      @steveaustin2716 ปีที่แล้ว +324

      Or it is manipulating the laws of physics. It seems to me that it would be easier to use the laws than to break them.

    • @samhouston8773
      @samhouston8773 ปีที่แล้ว +174

      Or we can not be arrogant and submit to a higher power and technology than we have

    • @jackhamerordewey9552
      @jackhamerordewey9552 ปีที่แล้ว +260

      @@samhouston8773 we would be in the dark ages if we followed your logic

  • @johnjohnson5818
    @johnjohnson5818 ปีที่แล้ว +1072

    When someone (like these guys) says something breaks the laws of physics, what they should have said is that "the physics of this object is beyond our current understanding".

    • @rayriley4020
      @rayriley4020 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yea what he really saying is more important such as its all a scam.

    • @stevecanfield4166
      @stevecanfield4166 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Yes, we only know what we know. May not even know the questions as ask.

    • @HRHMANSOUR
      @HRHMANSOUR 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      If something occurs that goes “beyond the understanding of physics” then by definition it has broken the pre established laws of physics. The laws of physics outline our understanding, therefore anything that happens outside of that the laws are broken.

    • @Seven_Leaf
      @Seven_Leaf 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rayriley4020 The aliens are among crowd is fanatical over what little evidence they have which supports some sort of paranormal, inter-dimensional or extra terrestrial sightings being anything other than a scam or an imagination gone wild over something, some others humans are doing.

    • @NG-VQ37VHR
      @NG-VQ37VHR 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      It depends whether you're referring to "our" established laws of physics that encompass our current understanding, or the laws of physics in general which we have yet grasp.

  • @over-educated-sp
    @over-educated-sp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +286

    It’s all shits and giggles until you see one with your own freaking eyes.

    • @LOOKINVERTED
      @LOOKINVERTED 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Arhaha, that gave me a chuckle, joking aside I'm presuming you've seen something you can't quite explain.

    • @MrPigryx
      @MrPigryx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yeah exactly I always say the same because the truth is also very experiential some times you really need to see it yourself but ones you see that unexplained outwardly thing then you can’t deny it anymore or make fun of it that’s why there always gonna be deniers even with ton of evidences and maybe it’s for the best but it is what it is if you’re not ready or maybe lucky have experience it you’ll never believe it

    • @over-educated-sp
      @over-educated-sp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@LOOKINVERTED By ways of accolades I’ve obtained a handful of degrees of science. I’ve been a skeptic. All things real can been seen with empirical evidence. I’m 52, 2 years ago my buddy and I were getting stoned in his car here in the Southern California high deserts. Yes, YES, I’ve “seen something’s.” What we saw defied all the laws of physics, and was not made by the hands of men. Everything I once thought I knew about our world flew right out the window that night!

    • @over-educated-sp
      @over-educated-sp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@MrPigryx Yea, but there are things out there, once seen, you can never “unsee.” I totally agree!

    • @LOOKINVERTED
      @LOOKINVERTED 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@over-educated-sp Fair enough, of course I don't know you from Adam but your story is echoed in countless others and even a couple of people I know personaaly. I've yet to have an experience like that for myself (for better or worse) so meantime all I can do is say I believe you. Perhaps an unfair followup but do you sometimes wish you hadn't seen what you saw given what it implies/suggests? Would it be better not knowing - ignorance is bliss as they say (though I'm not convinced choosing ignorance is ever beneficial in the long run). P.S: it may have seemed to defy the laws of physics - the laws of physics we know about - but perhaps the illusion of that law braking is simply our misunderstanding of what's really going on.

  • @jason.l5478
    @jason.l5478 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    Curiosity is the main basis of science. You find a way to find answers.
    Being smart with a phd is one thing. Having a passion to find answers is another.

    • @marcoi7035
      @marcoi7035 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      100

    • @charleswest6372
      @charleswest6372 หลายเดือนก่อน

      PhDs don't know didly. Read books on UFOS and Metaphysics. Forget paying $ for a useless degree.
      I hv a BSEE 1985 and it taught nothing on this.

    • @kwitwerikok8o863
      @kwitwerikok8o863 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No top shelf Physicists on UAP's. Maybe, but for the longest time, doing so was a career ender. That may change. Truth, either way, is always needed

    • @mikelxanadu
      @mikelxanadu 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Passion for answers typically leads to such degrees and qualifications, which then enables them to guide others. Unfortunately we have people like you who distrust anyone with the slightest credential to their name. I'll keep my smart people with phd's, you can keep your Terrence Howard's.

  • @416dl
    @416dl ปีที่แล้ว +2487

    As Joe mentions earlier in the podcast, a show with Bob Lazar and Eric W would see phenomenal response and record breaking numbers of people tuning in. Let's hope that happens too.

    • @michaelqiu9722
      @michaelqiu9722 ปีที่แล้ว +174

      Lazar is obviously a conman and it's actually embarrassing that Joe can't tell.

    • @2ndattention
      @2ndattention ปีที่แล้ว +63

      @@michaelqiu9722 Agreed. If Lazar does for some reason agree to it I’ll be beyond surprised as Eric would out him rather quickly. For anyone in doubt do about an hours worth of research into Lazar’s past, particularly around the time he first surfaced on the scene.

    • @jurtea1
      @jurtea1 ปีที่แล้ว +99

      @@michaelqiu9722 the whole “I got a headache”- Lazar was a red flag.

    • @chrimony
      @chrimony ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jurtea1 The multiple faked college degree claims from prestigious universities is a much bigger one.

    • @JordanDanielWende
      @JordanDanielWende ปีที่แล้ว +40

      There’s actually a physicist online who debunked every aspect of his story down to a T a few years ago. I always thought if Joe had read it he’d do a complete 180. If I can find the original article I’ll post a link.

  • @e1evenchar1ie69
    @e1evenchar1ie69 ปีที่แล้ว +1090

    That comment about B and C level people seeking out D level help so they dont feel threatened feels so on point for explaining a lot of things.

    • @pfzht
      @pfzht ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's why large hierarchies tend to be populated by incompetent sociopaths. Insecure Shitbags promoting insecure shitbags.

    • @thejohnroxbury
      @thejohnroxbury ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Sadly, this happens a lot in government. I witnessed it firsthand.

    • @IronicHavoc
      @IronicHavoc ปีที่แล้ว +25

      ​@JohnnytNaturalclassic "smart enough to not want the job"

    • @AloisWeimar
      @AloisWeimar ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Seen this in the private sector all the time, so many corporate and small businesses are full of these imbeciles usually second generation children of founders.

    • @flojotube
      @flojotube ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, except theyve placed D level people IN CHARGE of A level things at this point.... purposely, so that nothing ever seems credible.

  • @malachi9606
    @malachi9606 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    If something defies the laws of physics it’s because the laws of physics have fallen short and that we need to expand our understanding of the universe

    • @Eyes-of-Horus
      @Eyes-of-Horus 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Einstein said, "Science is Conditional Truth."

  • @ROD852
    @ROD852 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    He is not happy about not being in the big club.

    • @Uno_Floydd
      @Uno_Floydd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      No he is not happy because our government doesn’t tell us what they are doing with our taxes

    • @bradharris1062
      @bradharris1062 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well, he kind of is, like he says, they don't defy the laws of physics, if someone thinks they do, they don't know physics

    • @Naturallytoasty.
      @Naturallytoasty. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@Uno_Floydd they’re sending it to Zelenskyy lol

    • @Uno_Floydd
      @Uno_Floydd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Naturallytoasty. I know. It’s progressive liberal policies to blame

    • @cosmos-smallpiece5786
      @cosmos-smallpiece5786 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Correct …. His ego is bigger than his brain

  • @Itsad23_
    @Itsad23_ 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    Fun fact: When we say the laws of physics we are talking about the laws that we as a human race have already studied and confirmed.

    • @Excremental_Discharge
      @Excremental_Discharge 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The Laws of Physics is just mathematical theories, look it up

    • @dougtaylor7724
      @dougtaylor7724 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pretty much everything in our world is controlled by mathematics.

    • @DavidSmith-ux9hl
      @DavidSmith-ux9hl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Excremental_DischargeRight. They're real laws.

    • @Excremental_Discharge
      @Excremental_Discharge 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@DavidSmith-ux9hl no, they're theories. Do you know what "theory" means?

    • @DavidSmith-ux9hl
      @DavidSmith-ux9hl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Excremental_Discharge Yes. Do you know what a law in science is? Because laws and theories are two different things.

  • @paulyphonic
    @paulyphonic ปีที่แล้ว +129

    Joe must’ve forgotten that he WAS informed about the Wilson Memo. They talked about it when he had Jeremy Corbell on his podcast a good while ago.

    • @tonyping3159
      @tonyping3159 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yep you nailed it.

    • @acousticaesthetics7535
      @acousticaesthetics7535 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I thought the exact same thing I was thinking Joe you got to take notes. I downloaded that memo read it. I think the discussion was in a car if I'm not mistaken by eg&g

    • @jordanhenshaw
      @jordanhenshaw ปีที่แล้ว +5

      There are a lot of memos.

    • @acousticaesthetics7535
      @acousticaesthetics7535 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Memos and acronyms

    • @Sasquiny
      @Sasquiny ปีที่แล้ว +11

      He's was probably really High when it was first mentioned!

  • @douglassmith3016
    @douglassmith3016 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    There can only be one answer: *Our sciences are flawed.* The question: Are they flawed on purpose?

    • @technoweasel8937
      @technoweasel8937 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are they flawed on purpose? 𝗔𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹-𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴-𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗹𝘆 .
      The elites have controlled the general population for decades and want us to have breadcrumbs in comparison to what THEY have in secret. These are your big banks/etc.

    • @charleswest6372
      @charleswest6372 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Of course they are. Anyone can see that.

    • @Man_fay_the_Bru
      @Man_fay_the_Bru 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Noooo, it’s complete & utter nonsense

    • @averyb.476
      @averyb.476 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      More likely that the measurements of the objects are flawed

    • @K2ELP
      @K2ELP 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@charleswest6372 scientists themselcee swy that we cant know everything

  • @cosmicpsyops4529
    @cosmicpsyops4529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Why do you need disclosure? We should stop looking to our government as the authority on this subject since they obviously aren't designed for it or don't care to help us. We can make more progress by circumventing governments. The US is just hamstringing this whole endeavor.

    • @MrSneaksful
      @MrSneaksful 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      We the people are hamstringed by our government in general.

    • @Deletirium
      @Deletirium 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@cosmicpsyops4529 I'd love to hear your ideas on how exactly to go about doing that. Lol.

    • @BChandlerBaxter
      @BChandlerBaxter 14 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      I go right around them and do my own research. I completely agree.

  • @patrick5034
    @patrick5034 ปีที่แล้ว +670

    It’s so comforting to hear two human beings having a constructive argumentative conversation mutually uninterrupted , I’m sitting and listening in silence and enjoying every minute with no compulsion to post whatever runs into my head, it’s a real conversation between two people who have no desire to do one over on the other with there version of what they believe to be true, it’s respect 🇮🇪👍

    • @teresinacalliari-perez
      @teresinacalliari-perez ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Intelligent conversation no less! Shockingly no one is lying either, the horror!

    • @smithy4813
      @smithy4813 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Amen to this buddy^^

    • @truthsconnectionofficial
      @truthsconnectionofficial ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Right, I wish to see/hear the rest of it

    • @jakelovci9183
      @jakelovci9183 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Could you please explain your theory about suggestive listening to Liberals, thanks

    • @butkusfan23
      @butkusfan23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jakelovci9183 so liberals make you cry? Maybe they don’t listen to you because your crowd shouts “fuck your feelings,” and your crowd places last in education, meaning the things they’re shouting are not even intelligent or worth hearing. And when your team is the one trying to teach creationism instead of science, and tells everyone “f**k your feelings,” why should anyone listen to you? It would be a waste of time. And before you throw a tantrum and try to attack me- two things. One, I’m not a liberal. Two, for me to care what you say about me, I would first have to value you. I don’t. 😎

  • @DrBrianKeating
    @DrBrianKeating  ปีที่แล้ว +188

    *Don't miss Eric's first appearance since being on Joe Rogan: **_Click here and hit the bell!_* th-cam.com/video/zDTdm5ZS7gI/w-d-xo.html

    • @MR.COMMONSENSE1776
      @MR.COMMONSENSE1776 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The information is right in front of you man. Read between the lines.

    • @nickd920
      @nickd920 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@derekbentley334 Not caring doesn't explain whether or not it is true.

    • @gliixo
      @gliixo ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I'm confused as to why you felt the need to speedramp the video slightly. Why? It's glaringly obvious and completely unnecessary

    • @dr.brianjudedelimaphd743
      @dr.brianjudedelimaphd743 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Came for the UFOs and got some huge life story about nonsense …

    • @davidcleveland1071
      @davidcleveland1071 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      This is just dumb.. you don't need an MD to tell you you have a broken leg when you can see the freaking bone poking through the skin

  • @OpeneyesGuy
    @OpeneyesGuy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    One of the hardest things for people to grasp is that we aren’t top of the food chain here. It’s even harder for those who have not yet seen with their own two eyes, something they can’t explain.

    • @art0ni641
      @art0ni641 หลายเดือนก่อน

      None of it matters because a higher food chain won't let us surpass them. Even if it's not here one will be out there and it's the same if they are more advanced than us they will more likely be monitoring us and won't let us surpass them. We could just be livestock in this ever expanding universe

  • @blackbass4u2c
    @blackbass4u2c 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    I saw the United States Government's Antigravity craft on August 30th 2023. I was on Indiana highway 446 close to the Hoosier national Forest sign heading back from fishing at Lake Monroe. The craft when I saw it was traveling from west to east. At first I thought it was a helicopter searching for someone in the forest and it came into view and I tried to realize what I was looking at in amazement. It was huge and the light it was putting off was light lights of the city as I drove under it. The lights on it were in the corners and center were crisp white with a blue hue. It had red and green navigation lights and strobe lights and a spot light close to the center. It was painted gray with the access panels highlighted lighter gray. The panels were like the ones on the new stealth bomber design. It also had nose cones in the corners. The sides were rolled and not sharp like an air cutting edge. The way it moved in the sky was like it slid over the treetops and it didn't shake a leaf on the trees. It moved steadily with a slight rotation northward without changing direction. I believe it was built by Northrop Grumman facilities... Most of the sights I have heard of are in direct pathways of their facilities and it resembled it's design aspects as other crafts that they built.

    • @ilovetech8341
      @ilovetech8341 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      we used to go out and watch them in the desert. my family worked underground, deep down there, on stuff.

    • @mariobtron5907
      @mariobtron5907 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Was it an orb ? Did it move sloppy ? Like not in a straight line. But moving up and down rapidly ??

    • @blackbass4u2c
      @blackbass4u2c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@mariobtron5907 it was a triangle shaped craft. It was steady and slipped on by like it was surfing. The bottom was lightly concaved. It was painted gray and the access panels were highlighted in a lighter color gray paint.

    • @depiction3435
      @depiction3435 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      So how big was this fish again?

    • @blackbass4u2c
      @blackbass4u2c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@depiction3435 I am actually known for the fish I catch around the local area... The craft I saw was not a fish story... It happened. People who ridicule others for fun should be ashamed of themselves. I guess you are doing it to lessen my experience or testimony to a sighting... It doesn't work like that. Antigravity craft are real and the United States Government has them. It's probably where trillions of unaccounted for money goes.

  • @natec4133
    @natec4133 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The appearance of “breaking the laws of physics” is usually a good indicator that another physical law is at work. For example: Tens of thousands of pounds of metal defy gravity everyday by flying through the air. We call them airplanes and they use the law of aerodynamics to overpower gravity.
    It’s not a question of what law is being broken, it’s what law is being utilized.

  • @lnAmberClad
    @lnAmberClad ปีที่แล้ว +564

    This is one of the first times I've ever heard Eric Weinstein actually make a point. He usually just eloquently talks in circles without ever actually saying anything.
    It's nice to see him actually do something with his intelligence.

    • @danov3085
      @danov3085 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      "He usually just eloquently talks in circles", 😅. Should have been in politics. ALL politicians talk eloquently, not saying F-all.

    • @videobobdammit4818
      @videobobdammit4818 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      He actually made a point?? I was thinking the same thing: this guy just prattles on.

    • @NeoFryBoy
      @NeoFryBoy ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Joe likes people like this because they make him fell smart

    • @daemonthorn5888
      @daemonthorn5888 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      He actually does that here as well. He talks about travelling huge distances, by simply "lengthening the ruler, and then shrinking it again". Yeah, ok... And how do you do that? He says he has the answer, but never gives one.

    • @lmowner5722
      @lmowner5722 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I listened to the full podcast on Spotify….no clue what he said.

  • @zaxtan6235
    @zaxtan6235 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is there a full version of this podcast? it was cut off ….

  • @imikokodama3054
    @imikokodama3054 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Huge thanks to the people who helped bring us this information

  • @DJTHA-RO
    @DJTHA-RO ปีที่แล้ว +79

    The problem with humanity is, if we can’t comprehend something it’s not logical..to us. We have no idea what’s out there, what they’re capable of, and how far more advanced they are than us. We as humans need to keep a sense of optimism, and just be as prepared as we think we can be, for if/when we make contact.

    • @victoriaxoxo7712
      @victoriaxoxo7712 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You’re smart, I like you

    • @marlonhernandez8367
      @marlonhernandez8367 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Urantia…read the whole thing with an open mind and don’t judge until you finished spread the 🕊️

    • @BobbyDazzler888
      @BobbyDazzler888 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Well
      Just imagine humans with 100,000 years of evolution and technology.
      What have we achieved in 100 years?

    • @ch-yq5yn
      @ch-yq5yn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We has humans are incredibly arrogant and egotistical. We do not matter in this universe as much as we think, and our understanding of reality is nothing.

    • @MH-ev3wr
      @MH-ev3wr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Worse yet, the REALLY ignorant among us claim that which they don’t understand must be fake or CGI. It’s hilariously sad.

  • @Mastermindyoung14
    @Mastermindyoung14 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    My favorite part of this podcast "Michio Kaku is out of control" 🤣

    • @Spartan-Of-Truth
      @Spartan-Of-Truth หลายเดือนก่อน

      Read one of his books!

    • @lalalala8678
      @lalalala8678 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I ADORE Mr Kaku

  • @dirkstewart2043
    @dirkstewart2043 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In the mid-1970's, My Father and I were talking on the upstairs deck at his beach house in Oceanside, CA. A glint of light in the daytime sky caught my eye. When I looked up, I saw two round orbs, each about 60 feet across at an altitude of approximately 2,500ft Above Sea level. They were moving fast. Subsonic. No windows, no wings, no lights, no sound, metallic in color, flying southbound, parallel to the beach line. This was in proximity of Camp Pendleton, CA. I tried to direct my Father's attention to what I was seeing but the orbs were gone by the time he oriented himself. There is something going on. I don't know what, but I saw what I saw and cannot explain what was seen.

  • @jojoboynat
    @jojoboynat 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    If you find yourself the smartest man in the room, re-evaluate objectively.
    If you still find yourself the smartest man in the room, change room.

  • @Peter-jo3wt
    @Peter-jo3wt 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Joe Rogan has got this figured out.
    When you've got a well-connected genius on the program, Therorizing at Full Tilt, you must mumble affirmatively, just enough to keep the genius talking, for the sake of the shiow
    I would pay good money to hear this entire conversation in full.

    • @robbiecale3327
      @robbiecale3327 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This guy is definitely not a genius

    • @lukazupie7220
      @lukazupie7220 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robbiecale3327 why?

    • @lukazupie7220
      @lukazupie7220 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is full conversation not available anywhere?😮

  • @DrBrianKeating
    @DrBrianKeating  ปีที่แล้ว +135

    Is the government _hiding_ evidence of UFO technology?
    *Please subscribe and hit the 🔔 so you don’t miss my exclusive **_two hour_** chat with Eric dropping this week!*

    • @jasonc8307
      @jasonc8307 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yes, they are. With that said, their is a good reason but I see bad outcomes.
      Right time right place.
      Less then 30' from me.
      IPO in 1984 didn't make it you might say.
      3 months later my uncle crashed his plane 🤔 and died.
      His company showed a group of ppl this technology in Burbank CA.
      I was 13 years old.
      It floated, it flew all over the room with no sound.
      1000% fact, no bullshit

    • @rickrobson8122
      @rickrobson8122 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Thanks for your great podcast Dr. Brian Keating, always enjoy watching your YT channel. I'd only suggest that you focus more on the potential challenges to new theoretical models offered by the recent JWST discoveries. This subject of UFO is, IMO, a dead end. After almost a century of covering up by the US Military and Intelligence agencies the private scientific community should NOT expect anything from them at all.

    • @JohnDoe-bi5cc
      @JohnDoe-bi5cc ปีที่แล้ว +6

      HOLY COW!!! You are really keeping us going during this drought of Eric Weinstein content!! For FREE!!! You are a legend, Dr. Keating!!!!!

    • @DrBrianKeating
      @DrBrianKeating  ปีที่แล้ว +13

      My pleasure

    • @ryanlynch3579
      @ryanlynch3579 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There always hiding something. It may or may not be ufo's but one thing could be a strong possibility, that is they are hiding things they themselves aren't competent enough to understand and don't know what to do with.

  • @user-gb5pw3ei7z
    @user-gb5pw3ei7z 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fun Fact: There's about 100 comments saying "Fun Fact: If someone says 'it breaks the laws of physics that just means our understanding of physics is not yet on that level.'"

  • @Elevenated
    @Elevenated หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, sorry eric , but im wondering if I was falliing in an elevator and i perfectly timed it and jumped before impact, could I survive in suspended animation.. it would have to be perfectly timed bit theoretically iit is possible isn't it
    .

  • @sharalynnbillet5996
    @sharalynnbillet5996 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    I just love Joe Rogan he has the most interesting guests. Whether you believe what they're saying or not still makes for a interesting show...

  • @KITLEVEY
    @KITLEVEY ปีที่แล้ว +211

    I loved when he compared what he could understand of this by inserting CPAs into the string section of an orchestra with a reference to them understanding string theory.

    • @gilvietor1918
      @gilvietor1918 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      That was a very high watermark joke. Multilayered.

    • @timpage5021
      @timpage5021 ปีที่แล้ว

      You hear about the galaxies Webb captured that shouldn’t exist? Could be a glimpse into another universe and older universe that is left over from the Big Crunch .

    • @Doingstuff.since76
      @Doingstuff.since76 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally! 100%

    • @Flux_40
      @Flux_40 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      typical arrogant physicist who thinks laymen don't understand basic physics.
      the subject at hand is inertia, which most intelligent people fully understand regardless of knowing the equations.

    • @jmantruth
      @jmantruth ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@timpage5021 They've literally proven this false.

  • @Biketunerfy
    @Biketunerfy หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    There was a physicist called Stanton Freedman. He was a nuclear physicist and he talked about it and studied it and was very openly active researching it and he said they do defy the laws of physics as we currently understand them and he said and I quote: “I say defy the laws of physics as we currently understand them because clearly there is something wrong if these defy laws of physics and we still have more to learn”. I don’t think Eric has even googled it, if he had then he would have known there were physicists studying them 20+ years ago and there are plenty studying it now. Sadly Stan has passed away now.

    • @charleshammel8541
      @charleshammel8541 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm actually from Fredericton and had 2 random encounters with him. The latter was a couple years before his death, and he seemed reluctant to discuss the topics that garnered his notoriety. I'm sure he got a lot of flack, but not from me.

    • @Biketunerfy
      @Biketunerfy หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@charleshammel8541 He was a great researcher and like anyone that seriously digs down into this subject made him think we are being visited from where, when and how is up for debate but for now, there are a lot of scientists who say it’s a real phenomenon and I’m glad it’s finally getting the scientific study it so desperately needed. Certainly, there is now overwhelming evidence to say they exist than evidence to the contrary especially since many governments have come clean and said they don’t know the how, what, why, when and where.

  • @markbrown1609
    @markbrown1609 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i have friends in high-level military ranks who have disappeared, found one in an old PDF file were he was attending a meeting on defense systems.

  • @erom7904
    @erom7904 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Eric - "Do you know about the wilson memo?"
    Joe - "No"
    Hahahaha I remember more than once this Wilson Memo has been mention on Joe's Podcast, the last time was with Jeremy Corbell

    • @thatswhatithought6519
      @thatswhatithought6519 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Don't blame Joe, he is often high

    • @oli.y
      @oli.y 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I can think of a few times it's been mentioned and he always responds with no.

    • @jumpingblue1623
      @jumpingblue1623 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The discussion is for the viewers, not Joe!

    • @franalford202
      @franalford202 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thatswhatithought6519 I think Joe might possibly relate more “high” to people than we can relate straight !!😂

  • @desireeanne916
    @desireeanne916 ปีที่แล้ว +425

    Sounds reasonable and yet jaw-dropping. Let's bring more like this to the table of conversation.

    • @floydsemlow8253
      @floydsemlow8253 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Absolutely!! Everybody talks about Eric can't seem to answer question or goes around in to avoid it, I don't think that there's answers to give. Listening to him is intriguing . If you decipher what he saying in strange way it makes sense

    • @everythingclub599
      @everythingclub599 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is this not sad? How a government you put in power can hold information from you? Are humans that weak or are we just 🐒? Why can't us all around the world let our government know we want only the truth & if we're lied to, we will kill and torture them and their families cause that's what they're doing to us. The truth about Religion, Aliens, Wars And our own HISTORY BUT IM IN A WORLD FULL OF COWARDS & CELEBRITIES/entertainers/social media are distracting us in plain sight... But what does any of those things got to do with God or Death but clearly we got all the answers swayy

    • @joehouses5097
      @joehouses5097 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      IdK, why isn't weinstein working in R&D department for some Space or Defense company. He keeps speaking about academia and not the mad scientist types. The naturals. The geniuses

    • @davidkemp3154
      @davidkemp3154 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Offshore hedge funds for $200.

    • @Jeb51987
      @Jeb51987 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not reasonable cause he doesn’t know that there isn’t any. Just because none want to talk to him or anyone else about top secret stuff doesn’t mean there isn’t any. Everyone are kept apart so just cause the 2 guys he knows says this doesn’t mean anything. There job is to do this and NOT talk about it. And like bob said it’s not a normal job where everyone works together so how would his guy know who does what outside his tiny group?

  • @warias4821
    @warias4821 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    “Faking ufogasim”😂😂😂

  • @robertliss1700
    @robertliss1700 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    aliens do not understand morse code

  • @painless465
    @painless465 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I graduated Stony Brook,1987, Biochemistry major. I met CN Yang in the math tower. Was a complete humble gentleman, and obviously a giant in physics

    • @DrBrianKeating
      @DrBrianKeating  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wow. I’m jealous

    • @kellieborut8037
      @kellieborut8037 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Stonybrook hospital saved my life! I survived stage 4 Lung cancer due to their skill & research. One shot of radiation & 54 immunotherapy treatments. Fabulous doc/nurses there

    • @painless465
      @painless465 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kellieborut8037 awesome! I actually worked in the radiation oncology department as a college student making the lead plates Dr Meek was the chief of rad onc. I wish you great health moving forward and Gid bless you!

    • @rickdeckard1075
      @rickdeckard1075 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DrBrianKeating the dirac equation isnt mentioned in the vid...?

    • @Christopher-qq4dl
      @Christopher-qq4dl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@DrBrianKeating😂

  • @headsails
    @headsails 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    3:50 There is an open source project for deploying and managing these "sensors". I forgot the name of it and am not sure it's still active but know it was operational not long ago. It's basically a really simple system with off the shelf components that track all aerial object on a grid and is able to with other public comm systems target UFOs in real time and with great accuracy. This is where all this needs to head - not the government or corporate sector but the public sector.

  • @andygrenn680
    @andygrenn680 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I’ve listened patiently to this whole dialogue…My head is swimming. Far too much information for my feeble mind to comprehend. I can’t keep up. Where are my crayons?

  • @zmo1ndone502
    @zmo1ndone502 ปีที่แล้ว +350

    Now this is Eric at his best. Saying complex things but properly breaking them down in a digestible way for us non geniuses/physicists. Normally he rattles off a complex problem and provides impossible to understand analogies to describe said problem

    • @benjaminhogan1452
      @benjaminhogan1452 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Well said. Because he doesn't know if he is honest. His ego seems to contain all the answers but sorry , he doesn't know.

    • @drewgoodman7932
      @drewgoodman7932 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Very well said, this is a little bit better than his normal incoherent dross, but still pretty bad. He needs to take notes from Musk who can actually literally explain rocket science to a child in a few short sentences.

    • @murrijuana2842
      @murrijuana2842 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@Drew Goodman maybe it's time for you braindead children to grow up and learn something. Sorry, i mean "non geniuses".

    • @drewgoodman7932
      @drewgoodman7932 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@murrijuana2842 if I grow up and learn can I be as smart as you?

    • @pcproffy
      @pcproffy ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Can science explain why my wife has three orders of magnitude more dark energy than the rest of the universe?

  • @echevarriawilson
    @echevarriawilson ปีที่แล้ว +27

    What I understand about what is happening, is that the scientific community is laughing the data out of the lab and is never seriously being seen. No one wants to touch the subject because of the ridicule from thier peers.

    • @FUNKOfilms
      @FUNKOfilms ปีที่แล้ว

      Which all started because of the psyop conducted on the UFO community.

    • @NaruBrilu
      @NaruBrilu ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ya i was gonna say. Isnt it much more likely that maybe actual scientists/physicists just arent interested and not taking the time to debunk or prove the "evidence". They have more important shit to do and dknt have time to waste

    • @FUNKOfilms
      @FUNKOfilms ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NaruBrilu Not being curious is a sign that they aren't real scientists. Especially now with all the evidence coming out from military pilots.

    • @NaruBrilu
      @NaruBrilu ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FUNKOfilms are u a scientist? They r curious, just on stuff that actually matters. Not trying to debunk or prove blurry 420p footage

    • @FUNKOfilms
      @FUNKOfilms ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@NaruBrilu Sticking to current accepted science is the most anti science practice that someone can do.

  • @wellbi
    @wellbi วันที่ผ่านมา

    Witnesses: These crafts don't obey Newton's laws of motion, as we all know from elementary school.
    Weinstein: I need someone who can do Quantum mechanics and General relativity math to corroborate.

  • @jayb7427
    @jayb7427 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hey Joe, do you think we can get some microphones that don’t pick up everybody’s swallowing and lip smacking it makes it hard to listen to some of these podcast

  • @sonevgirl6331
    @sonevgirl6331 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I’m really glad someone else is talking about the competency crisis in this country!

    • @heathb4319
      @heathb4319 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Military Industrial Complex has taken over.
      They get all the good advancements and we get treated like peons that are just here to pay taxes and obey.

    • @mattschrader5047
      @mattschrader5047 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We stopped teaching people how to think and started teaching them what to think back in the 70's when public education was nationalized under Carter. Almost as damaging legislation to the future of our Republic as the Patriot Act. Both need to be abolished by the next administration if we are to escape this bureaucratic hell hole we have allowed to manifest.

    • @slow-mo_moonbuggy
      @slow-mo_moonbuggy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's crazy is that people are under the illusion that astronomy is a natural science. It's not. There isn't one verified scientific hypothesis constructed in the entire history of astronomy.

  • @Deep_Armageddon
    @Deep_Armageddon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    I love how Joe says he hasn't heard of "The Wilson memo"
    You know Jeremy Corbell is out there crying saying "i ToLd HiM aBoUt ThAt WhEn I wAs ThErE!!!"
    😂😂😂😂

    • @kevinadamson5768
      @kevinadamson5768 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂

    • @IStanAmerica
      @IStanAmerica 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      To be fair, he's getting a lot of information told to him on a daily basis. It's impossible to retain all of it

    • @nicholas.alan85
      @nicholas.alan85 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IStanAmerica that's true..

  • @FEXPL
    @FEXPL 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where to find full version of this intrwiev ?

  • @SudoUser-qo4ng
    @SudoUser-qo4ng หลายเดือนก่อน

    As someone who knows your passwords and Joes - Keeping a secret is hard.. OpSec leaks, hackers, mistakes in operation security, disgruntled employees, and so on..

  • @Jndthree
    @Jndthree ปีที่แล้ว +226

    Shout out to Mr. Rogan!! During the pandemic I was under the impression that he was some kind of quack, but lately I've been getting suggestion after suggestion of various Joe Rogan clips, and I have to say everyone I have seen has been absolutely captivating. His guests are so interesting. He seems willing to talk about anything and he does it intelligently. Who would have guessed a standup comic/Martial artist would be the best thing on the internet. He is like the David Attenborough of the podcast world. Willing to go anywhere to learn and teach and just converse. I love this guy and I love this show.

    • @justinbeck8001
      @justinbeck8001 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      I can't believe" they" tried to make him out to look like a quack!! He is changing the media landscape for the best!! Everyone needs to get rid of their cable TV cuz it's all garbage. Mad props to Joe Rogan and everyone like him , creating open uncensored dialogue. I'm so glad more people are tuning in

    • @heartsky
      @heartsky ปีที่แล้ว

      So you bought into the propaganda, welcome to the real world.

    • @digitalphoenix72
      @digitalphoenix72 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      His content has always been like this, at least since I started listening a few years ago. Interestingly, now you have a firsthand experience where you may notice that your impression of Joe being a quack was probably influenced heavily by the media.

    • @robertt9342
      @robertt9342 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Pretty sure giving nut jobs and experts equal weight on a given subject is not a commendable thing to do.

    • @michelleplombe7019
      @michelleplombe7019 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@robertt9342 Pretty sure that it is. Indeed it is a paradox to claim that an expert is a "nut job" without having heard them .. especially from that expert at length in his or her own words. The more complex and nuanced a topic, the more misleading is an attempt to present that topic in curated sound bites. If it could be presented in a sound bite, then it is not a complex topic.

  • @msallies
    @msallies ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "If you could not travel faster than the speed of light, you could not travel in space at all, and that perhaps is the assumption of many who still think that this is a barrier that cannot be surpassed. Even before there were any human civilizations in the world, space travel was underway to a very large and sophisticated extent. You can travel faster than the speed of light and counteract its effect on time and aging, and this has been practiced far longer than any human civilization." ~ The Allies of Humanity ~ 7th Briefing Questions & Answers

    • @johnchapman5125
      @johnchapman5125 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you.

    • @Vlad.o
      @Vlad.o ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow! I'm definitely checking this out. Very interesting.

  • @IntentionsOfAbsence
    @IntentionsOfAbsence 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    It sure seems like a lotta these laws aren't holding up in court. How many laws will it take to break a hole in a major foundation flaw🎭

  • @numbersix9468
    @numbersix9468 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine aliens traveling vast distances in incomprehensible tech but they keep crashing into earth. just cant get the hang of it

  • @WarzoneUser01
    @WarzoneUser01 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Fun fact: Joe was told previously about the willson memo by Jeremy Corbell on the Bob Lazar ep

    • @AaronKraftCreative
      @AaronKraftCreative 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fun fact: Jeremy Corbell sucks.

    • @kelliintexas3575
      @kelliintexas3575 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Wilson Memo to me was mind blowing. That made me think this might very well all be true.

    • @AbundantYouth
      @AbundantYouth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      The biggest podcaster on the planet I think he’s asking on behalf of his giant audience lol

    • @jasonstein460
      @jasonstein460 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah I think sometimes Joe suffers from information overload.

    • @Gigi1111Layna
      @Gigi1111Layna 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@AbundantYouthIndeed he was.

  • @pigro2
    @pigro2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Love the phrase "faking a UFO-gasm"

  • @propman3523
    @propman3523 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wow...this is the most enlightened dialogue I've heard in years! MORE!!!

  • @KenSiefert
    @KenSiefert 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    If Gordon Cooper said he saw them, they’re real…

  • @JohnDoe-cd6ro
    @JohnDoe-cd6ro ปีที่แล้ว +40

    I don't think they're extraterrestrial but rather interdimensional.

    • @insidejob8309
      @insidejob8309 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      ZERO proof of that. You are just parroting what you have read on the topic. There is something coming here with high technology but its not leaving a road map on where or how.

    • @UMAD666
      @UMAD666 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think is both

    • @insidejob8309
      @insidejob8309 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joseph7105 Just because you parrot does not mean you understand it. Try to parrot mathematics to me. Then see if you can pass a test. Maybe you would prefer I said Mindlessly parroting. Parroting without understanding. I can teach a monkey to cut and paste with a mouse it does not mean he understands what he just pasted. That is all I am saying. A none parrot would understand that.

    • @hugh8090
      @hugh8090 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think their neither. Probably a more rational, aswell as boring answer 😴

    • @insidejob8309
      @insidejob8309 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hugh8090 Well at least you know you are boring, shows great self awareness.

  • @cabochris100
    @cabochris100 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Once you clearly see a silent craft the size of a building, you don't need any physicists to know they're real!

  • @JoseValladaresArias
    @JoseValladaresArias 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hadn’t seen this video before. Agree with how much smarter he seems by trying to solve a problem instead of finding ways to try to disprove it. 👍

  • @georgeperez5662
    @georgeperez5662 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Alex Jones mentioned the Wilson Memo like 5 years ago when he was on the Rogan Podcast !!

  • @Esch_atton
    @Esch_atton ปีที่แล้ว +77

    We need our highest minds to work on the UFO/UAP phenomenon. Like Avi Loeb says "the public pays for science" science should work on the public's interests.

    • @robertsmith4681
      @robertsmith4681 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      the 'highest minds" that you speak of are in the private sector, not working for government or in academia where they wqill be under utilized ...

    • @Esch_atton
      @Esch_atton ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@robertsmith4681 you should listen to this entire podcast. There's a good chance that we barely have any serious high level fundamental physicists working on the UFO problem because we gutted our physics departments within academia over the last 50 years. Eric explains this all in the lead up to this clip.

    • @bidhrohi12
      @bidhrohi12 ปีที่แล้ว

      UFOs are modern versions of dragon sightings. The highest minds have better things to do.

    • @tonywells6990
      @tonywells6990 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The 'highest minds' would probably say 'You're joking! No thanks!'.

    • @Esch_atton
      @Esch_atton ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bidhrohi12 keep your head burried in the sand

  • @gnlilu6972
    @gnlilu6972 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    This blew my mind away. When you are geek and you understand the concept, you don't feel alone in this world.

    • @MrMjrob
      @MrMjrob ปีที่แล้ว +16

      If you want to believe you are special inside of your tiny, miniscule microcosm, then go right ahead dude. :D

    • @improvingdoomer3110
      @improvingdoomer3110 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rentech talk was just💥💥💥

    • @luceatlux7087
      @luceatlux7087 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrMjrob I believe he is special too.

    • @chrisbova9686
      @chrisbova9686 ปีที่แล้ว

      Obviously aliens are a govt psyop. next.

    • @warehousejo007
      @warehousejo007 ปีที่แล้ว

      👍🏽

  • @ckjamn
    @ckjamn 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I spent 80% of my life outside, day and night.
    I am not a non-believer.
    I never saw anything I could not explain. Ever.

    • @nonprogrediestregredi1711
      @nonprogrediestregredi1711 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Alright. That's good to know. Is this just meant to be mundane information or is it your belief that you making a point?

    • @lalalala8678
      @lalalala8678 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I spend that much outdoors for decades . Living at 4000 ft elevation with a view you wouldnt believe .An hr drive to closest town . NO Light pollution . Nothing I like more then sitting outside at night watching the sky . It's all open , not a tree blocking the sky . I have seen quite a few things I cant check off the list . I cant even find discriptions of a couple . They go under the UFO category ,not necc little green men . I wish I knew everything like some people . I feel fairly confident in my ruling out capabilities . It isnt hard to rule out aircraft , satellites , meteorites,ISS . I hear "oh its a satellite" FO I watch satellites for fun . There are so many of them , constant . hard to sit outside for 5 minutes without seeing one , where I live anyway . At least there is SOMETHING to look for . They are very specific and easy to spot once you know what they are . Im always surprised though by people that say they have never seen one or our Milky Way for that matter . I guess I take it for granted.

  • @nixonsmateruby1
    @nixonsmateruby1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I heard that people ask why no one takes a photo when they see one, so I seen a ufo and photographed it. A newspaper didn't want to know? Yet I believe its the best photograph of a UFO I've seen.

    • @lalalala8678
      @lalalala8678 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      People take pics all the time and the responce is " Thats so grainy it has to be fake " then "Thats so clear it has to be fake"

  • @karadan100
    @karadan100 ปีที่แล้ว +158

    Actually Bob Lazar explained this. He said they deliberately employed physicists from community colleges and lesser-universities just so there wouldn't be obvious holes in talent in non-secret sectors. It also goes to explain the stupidity of the people Bob replaced when they tried to open a working reactor with an angle-grinder, killing themselves. They weren't hiring the best.

    • @25oxendine
      @25oxendine ปีที่แล้ว

      or it could be the level of international spies in the American scientific community, especially Chinese

    • @Taunt61
      @Taunt61 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      they didn't put community college types on the manhattan project. this idea makes no sense, you want the best minds, at least good minds on this. not the lowest part of the bell curve.

    • @Omega6489
      @Omega6489 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yeah, that is what Eric was saying about the missing PhDs in the NSA.

    • @salvatoremarchese1792
      @salvatoremarchese1792 ปีที่แล้ว

      First off the smartest people are not in the best colleges

    • @lewis1717
      @lewis1717 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@iamme25yagoexactly, like the so called smart guy on who wants to be a millionaire that got the first question about ikea wrong 😂

  • @geoffsaunderson5766
    @geoffsaunderson5766 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This guy makes my head hurt, the full pod cast is excellent, I had to replay a few bits just so I actually got it.

  • @MrDlt123
    @MrDlt123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Joe: "Jamie, pull up a pic of a sasquatch particle physicist."

  • @paulturner6498
    @paulturner6498 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why did it shut off before the end?

  • @currentcommerce4774
    @currentcommerce4774 ปีที่แล้ว +169

    weinstein is an electric storyteller
    he really has me on the edge of my seat discussing this stuff

    • @sirjohnahayfalcon
      @sirjohnahayfalcon ปีที่แล้ว +4

      electricity and geometry will explain the story weinstien

    • @wannabeprettysoul
      @wannabeprettysoul ปีที่แล้ว

      He is CIA operative, do your research...

    • @drindy5166
      @drindy5166 ปีที่แล้ว

      💯%

    • @Vgallo
      @Vgallo ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Nah man, you haven’t heard him talk enough if you have this opinion, one of the main critiques of Weinstein is he talks in circles whilst eating nothing.
      Although In this clip he did a good job

    • @ricksterk7014
      @ricksterk7014 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you being sarcastic?

  • @chriskucia8348
    @chriskucia8348 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Manhattan project was mentioned. It occurred to me that one of the eventual developments of that project was the info was leaked to the USSR. Given the state of the world at that time, it's not difficult to imagine that drastic measures were put in place to eliminate future leaks of that sort among scientists working on black projects. It's conceivable that those measures were never relaxed and now work against progress, but no one has the comprehensive overview or authority to remedy it.

    • @storksforever2000
      @storksforever2000 ปีที่แล้ว

      If these programs actually exist they're probably so compartmentalized and hyper need-to-know that they're essentially worthless and just sit there burning whatever money gets directed to them.

  • @jje984
    @jje984 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For fun I checked out the stony brook physics departments he mentioned. It's definitely an impressive faculty but I can only count 40 faculty total which probably isn't enough to be at Manhattan Project levels of staffing. They publish a lot of papers that seem to mostly be related to string theory or high energy particle physics. A public university would be a terrible place to try to hide anything because it would be subject to FOIA requests.
    I think it's just a strong theoretical physics department that is either trying to extend the standard model or dithering in string theory. It's not a place rethinking the foundation of how we understand reality.

  • @AncientAmnesia
    @AncientAmnesia 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    There's physicist on the team, they're just never gonna be on a visible piece of paper or anything available to the public

  • @produceresults6864
    @produceresults6864 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    10:28 Cuts off right when he names "black rock", lol

  • @airman4023
    @airman4023 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    The depth of this conversation is astounding!! No BS just straight facts!

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Except - what is it about?

    • @msimon6808
      @msimon6808 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I speak Physics. Some - I'm an EE. What are they talking about?

    • @RetiredInThailand
      @RetiredInThailand ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@msimon6808 I think Eric was TRYING to say that in order to explain the phenomenon as either alien or some new unknown Earthly physics denying phenomenon, you would want a physicist there to examine the evidence to either explain it in terms of the physics we know, or verify that the physics as presented were not possible under our understanding of physics (or maybe physically possible under our knowledge of physics, but only under engineering that would not be possible without harnessing a level of power that would be impossible using the current levels of physics and engineering understanding.)
      I am personally not a big fan of his 'physics', and especially the way he presents his theories (ie. in either complete gibberish, or I guess he could be the smartest physicist and mathematician to ever have lived and no one currently living is capable of understanding his theories ... I lean toward the former) but in this case I agree. The UFO issue is either natural phenomenon, secret advanced military equipment, or people being fooled by good fakes and optical illusions.

    • @poison7512
      @poison7512 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Zero actual facts though.

    • @mickreynolds3306
      @mickreynolds3306 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Straight BS....you almost got it right.

  • @rikkiit452
    @rikkiit452 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wake me up when theres a ufo in a museum what we can view for ourselves 😂

  • @gassgames
    @gassgames 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I miss seeing these full podcasts on youtube

  • @frankcoley1537
    @frankcoley1537 ปีที่แล้ว +161

    This guy is talking sense.
    The smarter you are in this world you're always trapped within the confines of people who know far less than you.
    Most of the time it's your boss and it's rare when you have that one person who Excels further in a position of power.
    The thing is, people are so stupid they wouldn't even know if that person was very intelligent. They're trapped within the confines of "power trips" and "I'm your boss" mentality.

    • @shahveerpatel8974
      @shahveerpatel8974 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably the best comment I have read in decades .... Also my sincerest sympathies for being surrounded with dumb ppl😅

    • @jaymethodus3421
      @jaymethodus3421 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s both a blessing and a curse to know things that none except yourself can ever know without proof.

    • @flowgangsemaudamartoz7062
      @flowgangsemaudamartoz7062 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @Xxaphius Or you felt called out by Franks comment. :)

    • @ihavetubes
      @ihavetubes ปีที่แล้ว +5

      it's funny that people think they are more intelligent than they actually are. I bet most people who work for a boss has this type of mentality, well if I was in change we would make more money, lol sure you would.

    • @DEUltra82
      @DEUltra82 ปีที่แล้ว

      Looks like someone doesn't like their boss.

  • @MrRuffle
    @MrRuffle ปีที่แล้ว +9

    When Joe says he hasn't heard of the Wilson memo he obviously was blocking out Jeremy Corbells annoying voice and delivery like I was

  • @Meineself
    @Meineself ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Eric Weinstein gets it. He was describing the literal "G-Project" which was headed by the likes of George S. Thimble of The Martin Company (later merged into Lockheed-Martin in the 70s), in cooperation with Clarke Electrical Laboratories headed by Dudley Clarke, General Dynamics and Bell-Textron Aircraft circa 1956-1958.
    Search Battelle Memorial Institute.

    • @betterd9160
      @betterd9160 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is that skunk works?

    • @Meineself
      @Meineself ปีที่แล้ว

      @@betterd9160 I wish, because that would mean its declassified and at least somewhat understood. The main winner of the defense contracts after the g project was Bell-Textron... blue book case number 10270...

    • @betterd9160
      @betterd9160 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok I read on Battelle. I’ve never heard of them before. I also had no idea there were so many national laboratories. I only knew Argon. Ok I searched it now I’d appreciate it if you Wikipedia Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism. I think it explains a lot

    • @Maravone
      @Maravone ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Meineself Someone talking sense here! "aliens" or not, the links and weirdness surrounding Martin-Marietta, Battelle, DOE, etc in the early 50s really raises some alarm bells.

  • @patriciaatkinson2435
    @patriciaatkinson2435 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    My bet is that the narrow departmentalisation of the research is to avoid enabling potential whistleblowers from having sufficient info to pass on to opposing powers - as with nuclear secrets following WWII.

  • @carljhirst
    @carljhirst หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Internet communication across the World, defies the Laws we didn't know back then, say 100 years ago.
    So if we don't understand something, doesn't mean it defy laws.

  • @timb350
    @timb350 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    Besides being an incredibly intelligent man...Eric is also one of the best communicators around. He is precise, succinct, economical and intelligible. He never talks down to anyone... yet at the same time he never compromises his own high standards...so his listeners have to make the effort to comprehend where he's at. Brilliant! Easily one of my favourite speakers.

    • @businesscreditconsultants
      @businesscreditconsultants ปีที่แล้ว

      True, but UFO"s DO DEFY the Laws of Physics. We've seen the declassified footage. Bob Lazar wasn't lying

    • @brettharter143
      @brettharter143 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      You have to be deluded if you believe this. He talks in circles, doesnt answer questions and is a bit of a narcissist

    • @thaynealexander
      @thaynealexander ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well said, and I agree. But I don't know If I would like him as a person though. lol

    • @thaynealexander
      @thaynealexander ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@brettharter143 That's because he's talking above your head and pay grade. I understand him perfectly.

    • @automaticwriting4220
      @automaticwriting4220 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@brettharter143 Stay in school. What he’s saying isn’t that hard.

  • @DrakeLarson-js9px
    @DrakeLarson-js9px 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    The Dirac equation was poorly thought of at UCLA in the math & physics department in the 1970s. Eric is astute with his questions and analogies.

    • @michaell.445
      @michaell.445 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I don't get why he's even questioning the laws of physics being broken at all it's a flat out stupid question has he even heard of ANY details about a UFO at all? Does he need to have a physicist explain to him what wings are for and how they work and how none of the craft ever have any?

    • @highdesertbiker
      @highdesertbiker 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@michaell.445Eric goes on these extremely wordy rants to make it seem like he knows some mystery that no one else does. Then at the end of the conversation, I always just pause and go, wtf did he just say? I never get anywhere with his conversations

    • @mathewsawyer4811
      @mathewsawyer4811 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@michaell.445 he’s questioning why there’s no physicist confirming these details. It’s a logical question. It also shows there may be more to this story that isn’t being talked about. I’m obviously not a physicist, so me saying something breaks the laws of physics when I can’t prove it means very little, which is what he’s highlighting here.

    • @michaell.445
      @michaell.445 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mathewsawyer4811 Like I said; it doesn't take one to explain the obvious though it's been done anyway.

    • @gwilymyddraig
      @gwilymyddraig 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@highdesertbiker
      a propos Eric Weinstein...
      "Oh, he'll put you in a coma."
      Joe Rogan

  • @MisterK-YT
    @MisterK-YT 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Fun fact that nobody but me seems to remember: Joe says he doesn’t know who Erik Davis is nor the Wilson memo. Well, Jeremy Corbell talked about the Wilson memo on Rogan. And more interestingly, Joe HAD ERIK DAVIS ON HIS OLD TV SHOW Joe Rogan Questions Everything. It was Duncan who spoke to Davis though, not Joe. So it makes perfect sense that Joe wouldn’t remember him. It’s a fairly generic name too. But I always think about that every time someone mentions Davis on JRE. I‘ve only known about Erik Davis for so many years BECAUSE OF Joe Rogan Questions Everything
    (If anyone is curious, he was in the Skinwalker Ranch episode)

  • @numbersix9468
    @numbersix9468 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't want to live in a world where you can't even believe fireworks-selling brothel owners who say they've hung out in alien spaceships after going bankrupt.

  • @tinfoilpapercut3547
    @tinfoilpapercut3547 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    when I listen to Weinstein, every 4 minutes I feel like I've walked into a conversation I have absolutely no context for and can't quire put into place- even through I 've been listening from the start.

    • @simbafrika
      @simbafrika ปีที่แล้ว

      He is brilliant no doubt but he is so verbose I get lost trying to follow him

    • @sometimessnarky1642
      @sometimessnarky1642 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I felt like I was hearing a lot of words that didn't really say anything personally.

  • @Invisibility6
    @Invisibility6 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    Exceptional information, great podcast would love to see the whole interview. Thanks to both

    • @b3at2
      @b3at2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      What information? it's just two dudes talking about nonsense.

    • @b3at2
      @b3at2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JeanHuguesNumeroOne I voted for the true aliens who gave us the cell phone😂😂😂

    • @b3at2
      @b3at2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JeanHuguesNumeroOne knew you would say that… I didnt vote at all… you assume too much like a twitter user. 😂. Only one type of person assumes a persons character… wheres your hood?

    • @keenannorris3309
      @keenannorris3309 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have no idea what he's talking about 1) b/c I'm not smart enough to understand it, and 2) b/c he's mostly talking about what isn't rather than whatever his idea is.

  • @alexandernunez9728
    @alexandernunez9728 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I believe that. We got doordashers employed as physicists, & gig workers giving us the weather😅😅😅😅😅

  • @bearhead9633
    @bearhead9633 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I live in Setauket. It's widely considered the b Kentucky of Long Island

  • @foot2thepind.-db5md
    @foot2thepind.-db5md ปีที่แล้ว +258

    This has been one of the most informative videos I have watched about this very topic. What really grabbed my attention to this was the logic, and simply asking the questions.
    Doctor Keating, for the sake of the rest of us... keep digging!.

    • @dariofromthefuture3075
      @dariofromthefuture3075 ปีที่แล้ว

      All you need to know. Dr Greer is the guy.
      m.th-cam.com/video/NSLm__BUnmI/w-d-xo.html

    • @jordanmartinez2432
      @jordanmartinez2432 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Shawn Ryan show episode #48. If you want answers.

    • @mikeceebo8611
      @mikeceebo8611 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jordanmartinez2432 is that the dude from the Gaia thing? No thanks

    • @lolwut6434
      @lolwut6434 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      indeed. but i dont think the gov would need a top physicist working on the project if they are trying to reverse engineer the technology. you dont need to understand the intricate fundamental workings of electricity to be able to wire a house, you just need to have seen someone else wire a house and be able to copy them.

    • @dariofromthefuture3075
      @dariofromthefuture3075 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@mikeceebo8611 He's been around for 30+ years- waaaaay before Gaia Tv. He has no affiliation with them other than sharing his independant research with them in a few videos. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater - Greer is incredible.

  • @colinforsecs3393
    @colinforsecs3393 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Not saying I'm smarter than Eric but 3 years ago he said Trump lacked the mental capability to be in charge of nuclear weapons and that we need the democrats to take back the office and set it straight..
    Hasn't worked out well Eric

  • @bx3556
    @bx3556 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We have thousands of Ph.D. Physics people who we don't know where they went and where they work anymore. Can't even find their resumes anymore. Though I doubt you need something as big as Manhattan project.

  • @Thrive910
    @Thrive910 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Anyone picturing Joe Biden asking to see the alien crafts or is it just me?

  • @sylbaster2658
    @sylbaster2658 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The fact the we exist means it's possible. The fact that our species stretches back much farther than history can account for and extinctions have happened so many times means life finds a way.

  • @chelseas4118
    @chelseas4118 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    I listened to the entire podcast and it is so far above my understanding and I’m sure the guest was dumbing it way down.. this is who we need researching ufos.

    • @badtrekee4348
      @badtrekee4348 ปีที่แล้ว

      This guy is a shoemaker compared to Aliens. Once he sees the crafts that Lazar discribed he will know he is out of business. A wise man says he knows nothing. This guy thinks he knows everything. Theories mean shit til proven.

    • @stoptrudeau42
      @stoptrudeau42 ปีที่แล้ว

      1st thing i found out from government lockdowns. Is just cause you have a high iq or a degree. Doesnt mean you have common sense or a open mind. Prob took 4 jabs

    • @decadeyt5891
      @decadeyt5891 ปีที่แล้ว

      Imagine how much more intelligent ai will become

    • @HardMode..
      @HardMode.. ปีที่แล้ว +2

      you're not dumb, they are just rambling on and talking sh**, this is just stoner conversation between two people that are good at talking.

  • @ilovetech8341
    @ilovetech8341 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    we are not allowed to research electrical engineering. Eric Dollard explains how you need to be a marine to work in that field. It is one of the most heavily surpressed fields.

  • @fluxcapacitor
    @fluxcapacitor หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jack Sarfatti, maybe?
    _Crickets_

  • @quantumbitz3473
    @quantumbitz3473 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    There are few people I have tracked across platforms. Thank you Dr. Brian.

  • @solank7620
    @solank7620 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone have a link to this episode? Or the episode number?
    I want to hear about this Blackrock stuff. I couldn't find this episode on TH-cam though. I found another one with him, where Rogan is wearing a different shirt, but not this one...

    • @TenthCrane2788
      @TenthCrane2788 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Joe Rogan Eric Weinstein interview is on Spotify episode 1945

    • @solank7620
      @solank7620 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TenthCrane2788 Great thanks a lot for letting me know 🙂

  • @ajjamaal646
    @ajjamaal646 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If i start floating, i don't need a physicist to tell me me I'm floating.