Love every second of this! Thanks again for creating the IoTT controller and make it so configurable! I wonder where you find the time to do all this on top of your house relocation!) 😉
For short questions, put them into the comment section of the video that triggers the question. For longer or complex questions, please send an e-mail.
It has a differential input, so if you feed it a cutout, it should generate a short circuit on the track, which can be used by a Railcom sensor. Not tested yet, but that was the design idea.
As JMRI supports SV programming, the probable intent was that someone writes a "decoder file" for programming the SilverHat. Then the multiple reads would be covered within JMRI, and fields would have human-readable labels and interpretation, rather than SV numbers.
Yes, I guess that is the idea. But I don't think there is a lot of support. For the SilverHat I figured I am better off to create a browser based stand-alone program because it can be used by everyone, not just JMRI users.
Looking very good Hans! Good feature set! Thanks!
Thank you.
Love every second of this! Thanks again for creating the IoTT controller and make it so configurable! I wonder where you find the time to do all this on top of your house relocation!) 😉
Good question! Probably some late night work ;-)
new to your site have some questions for past videos but not sure where to post the questions.
For short questions, put them into the comment section of the video that triggers the question. For longer or complex questions, please send an e-mail.
This looks excellent....one question though - does the Silver Hat generate a Railcom cutout, or is this still on your roadmap?
It has a differential input, so if you feed it a cutout, it should generate a short circuit on the track, which can be used by a Railcom sensor. Not tested yet, but that was the design idea.
As JMRI supports SV programming, the probable intent was that someone writes a "decoder file" for programming the SilverHat. Then the multiple reads would be covered within JMRI, and fields would have human-readable labels and interpretation, rather than SV numbers.
Yes, I guess that is the idea. But I don't think there is a lot of support. For the SilverHat I figured I am better off to create a browser based stand-alone program because it can be used by everyone, not just JMRI users.