Matrix67 Puzzle 13 Solved [The Haselbauer IQ Test]
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Discord: / discord
Matrix67: www.matrix67.co...
Matrix67 claims to be one of the hardest IQ tests on the internet with a measuring range above 180 IQ. Every coming Saturday I will post one video per week where I go through one of the Matrix67 puzzles. There are 25 puzzles in total, some seem very hard, some seem very easy and some seem to be impossible to solve. Feel free to join my discord server and help us solve every single Matrix67 puzzle: / discord
-------------------------------------
Contact me
Twitch: / pas1729
Twitter: / pas1729
Reddit: / puzzlesandsolutions
Discord: PAS#2348 [Server: / discord ]
Facebook: / puzzles-and-solutions-...
The Puzzles & Solutions channel will be dedicated to solving puzzles and other things similar to puzzles.
i am very interested in how you reason these problems to be able to solve them by yourself, you should also make videos of how you do it so that people can have a thought guide that nobody teaches them :)
I can't find the way to solve the first exercise, i'd like to see you how you do it
Wouldn't we all, I have only glanced at it but it does look quite scary
In fact we are primitive creatures and I will prove it to you, most of those who score 130 points can't solve these puzzles and we look at them as they are very smart, these puzzles may measure their abilities of 160 and above which means geniuses and emphasizing who designed by a genius but imagine that there are creatures their intelligence degree above 500 points and they set puzzles that no human being can solve. We will see ourselves as idiots and primitives. LoL
@@maherm2 Do you know what your iq is?
@@leofox1676 Denmark 130
Norway 121
😂😂 I think my real iq is 115
@@maherm2 Ah I see, have you tried the Nicologic test? It *supposedly* goes up to 200
You are a genius 🤓
Assume A is on top. D C H B are in the corners so there is only one possible arrangement for them in the grid. Since G obstructs H(as H can only be in the bottom left quarter of the grid but is not shown completely) , F to B and E to C then G is on top of H and so on. However G is in turn obstructed by the D, F by H, E by B then D is above G and so on.
Therefore the general pattern is that A is on top, then upon selecting G, E or F, moving anticlockwise, the one before it obstructs it , and G E or F obstructs the one after it.
25 pleaseeee
Read up on game theory, such as the Hawk-Dove game and then you create a simple outcome matrix, and hence formulae for the population distribution of furbles.
This was the easiest question on the test along with the coin question.
In fact we are primitive creatures and I will prove it to you, most of those who score 130 points can't solve these puzzles and we look at them as they are very smart, these puzzles may measure their abilities of 160 and above which means geniuses and emphasizing who designed by a genius but imagine that there are creatures their intelligence degree above 500 points and they set puzzles that no human being can solve. We will see ourselves as idiots and primitives. LoL
So you 'proved' that we are primitive creatures by telling us to imagine more advanced creatures than us?
@@02_rajatchakraborty18 Yes, because according to mathematics, you can imagine high levels of intelligence. What you may find difficult will be easy for the smartest of you. And so is the chain, which means that we are worthless creatures.
@@maherm2 Oh okay,so the universe also must be worthless,as it is made up of all worthless creatures,who can imagine higher levels of intelligence than them.
@@02_rajatchakraborty18 No, not like that, but humans have little intelligence compared to creatures higher than them. Humans find it difficult to solve puzzles such as this one for example.
Doesn't the same go for all creatures,irrespective of their positions compared to humans,that they can imagine higher levels of intelligence? Got your point by the way,that humans must not think that they have control of everything in the world.
23 pleaseee
Answer appears to be related to the number of sides of each adjacent tile to the adjacent tile of the tile in question. Very confusing to try to word this, 2nd degree adjacent tiles? However there may be an inconsistency with the tile 47, which doesn’t follow the rule, might be a mistake with the question.
Ez
respect !