Why the US Left Vietnam (Documentary)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 เม.ย. 2024
- Get a NordVPN with a 2-year plan plus 4 additional months with a huge discount and 30-day money back guarantee: nordvpn.com/realtimehistory
With violent anti-war protests at home and discipline problems on US bases, President Nixon promises to withdraw American troops from the Vietnam War. But that doesn’t mean an end to the fighting. As US troop numbers drop, the war expands across borders and in the air as more weapons are pumped into the South
» SUPPORT US
/ realtimehistory
nebula.tv/realtimehistory
» THANK YOU TO OUR CO-PRODUCERS
David Garfinkle, Raymond Martin, Konstantin Bredyuk, Lisa Anderson, Brad Durbin, Jeremy K Jones, Murray Godfrey, John Ozment, Stephen Parker, Mavrides, Kristina Colburn, Stefan Jackowski, Cardboard, William Kincade, William Wallace, Daniel L Garza, Chris Daley, Malcolm Swan, Christoph Wolf, Simen Røste, Jim F Barlow, Taylor Allen, Adam Smith, James Giliberto, Albert B. Knapp MD, Tobias Wildenblanck, Richard L Benkin, Marco Kuhnert, Matt Barnes, Ramon Rijkhoek, Jan, Scott Deederly, gsporie, Kekoa, Bruce G. Hearns, Hans Broberg, Fogeltje
» SOURCES
Amter, Joseph A. “America Negotiates a Meaningless Peace” in Yancy, Diane (ed.), The Vietnam War, (San Diego, CA : Greenhaven Press Inc. 2001)
Anderson, David L. The Vietnam War, (Basingstoke : Palgrave MacMillan, 2005)
Appy, Christian G. Working-Class War: American Combat Soldiers and Vietnam, (Chapel Hill, NC : University of North Carolina Press, 1993)
Appy, Christian G. Patriots: The Vietnam War Remembered From All Sides, (New York, NY : Viking, 2003)
Appy, Christian, Vietnam: The Definitive Oral History, Told From All Sides, (London : Ebury Press, 2006)
Blasiot, Leonard A., Dawson, David A., Shulimson, Jack & Smith, Charles R., U.S. Marines in Vietnam: The Defining Year 1968, (Washington DC : History and Museums Division HQ, US Marine Corps, 1997)
Bluhm Jr. Raymond K. (ed), The Vietnam War: A Chronology of War, (New York, NY : Universe Publishing, 2010)
Caputo, Philip, A Rumor of War, (New York, NY : Ballantine Books, 1977)
Daddis, Gregory A, Withdrawal: Reassessing America’s Final Years in Vietnam, (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2017)
Ehrhart, W.D. Vietnam-Perkasie: A Combat Marine Memoir, (Jefferson NC : McFarland, 1983)
Gettleman, Marvin E. (ed), Vietnam: History, Documents and Opinions on a Major World Crisis, (Harmondsworth : Penguin Books Ltd, 1967)
Kolko, Gabriel, “Crisis in the Military” in Yancy, Diane (ed.), The Vietnam War, (San Diego, CA : Greenhaven Press Inc. 2001)
Langer, Howard J. The Vietnam War: An Encyclopedia of Quotations, (Westport, CT : Greenwood Press, 2005))
Lawrence, Mark Atwood, The Vietnam War: A Concise International History, (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2008)
Longley, Kyle, Grunts: The American Combat Soldier in Vietnam, (Armonk N.Y. : M.E. Sharpe, 2008)
Moïse, Edwin E. Tonkin Gulf and the Escalation of the Vietnam War, (Annapolis, MD : Naval Institute Press, 2019)
Rotter, Andrew J. “Chronicle of a War Foretold: The United States and Vietnam, 1945-1954" in Lawrence, Mark Atwood & Logevall, Fredrik (eds), The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and Cold War Crisis, (Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2007)
Ruane, Kevin (ed.), The Vietnam Wars, (Manchester : Manchester University Press, 2000)
Schulzinger, Robert D. “Antiwar Protests Rock America” in Yancy, Diane (ed.), The Vietnam War, (San Diego, CA : Greenhaven Press Inc. 2001)
Thee, Marek, “The Indochina Wars: Great Power Involvement - Escalation and Disengagement”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 13, No. 2 (1976)
Tiu Bin, Following Ho Chi Minh: Memoir of a North Vietnamese Colonel, (Honolulu, HI : University of Hawaii Press, 2003)
Tovy, Tal, The Gulf of Tonkin: The United States and the Escalation in the Vietnam War, (New York, NY : Routledge, 2021)
Yancy, Diane (ed.), The Vietnam War, (San Diego, CA : Greenhaven Press Inc. 2001)
»CREDITS
Presented by: Jesse Alexander
Written by: Mark Newton
Director: Toni Steller
Editing: Toni Steller
Motion Design: Toni Steller, Philipp Appelt
Mixing, Mastering & Sound Design: above-zero.com
Research by: Mark Newton
Fact checking: Florian Wittig, Jesse Alexander
Executive Producer: Florian Wittig
Channel Design: Simon Buckmaster
Contains licensed material by getty images, AP and Reuters
Maps: MapTiler/OpenStreetMap Contributors & GEOlayers3
Music Library: Epidemic Sound
All rights reserved - Real Time History GmbH 2024
Get a NordVPN with a 2-year plan plus 4 additional months with a huge discount and 30-day money back guarantee: nordvpn.com/realtimehistory
I am also of the opinion that the My Lai massacre was overblown, and we are not alone. Those numbers you're talking about aren't insignificant, that's the American people with a common sense opinion.
Not hard to see why he was let go.
Great video.
Will you be covering the 1877 Russo Turkish War or the 1895 Sino Japanese War out of interest
Thank you Real Tme History. North Vietnam like Communist China are pre-industrialized countries. Their weapons come from the Soviet Union. Look at North Korea and South Korea. Where would you like to live? In the land of free speech anyone can say anything. North Korea or South Korea? That is the question. Long live liberalism and republicanism.
Awfully fitting to post this video on the Anniversary of the Fall of Saigon.
I am a Marine combat veteran of the Gulf War. There was a captain in my battalion who had served three tours in Vietnam and was an expert on our involvement and the history of Vietnam etc.
He spoke to us in depth about the war. This is not the forum to go into too many details but suffice it to say that despite winning every major battle and inflicting massive casualties on the NVA and VC - the war was an unwinnable quagmire. After 1969 the men in the field had had enough. They knew the war was for nothing. The pressure at home was huge to get out. Everybody wanted out. We spent the next 3 years slowly withdrawing.
I didn’t matter how many enemy soldiers we killed. They weren’t going anywhere. The South was doomed from the beginning. This is an excellent video.
You have all the watches, they have all the time?
It was a matter of survival for the vietnamese, while american soldiers didn't feel like they had any real business being half a world away
@@DanielGarcia-kw4ep exactly right.
The South actually was not doomed from the beginning if the CIA didn't give the "green light" on the coup aganist Ngo Dinh Diem in 1963 and further putting troops into the South. The act of aking Diem out gave the Viet Cong a huge relief on their side.
@@DanielGarcia-kw4ep The American troops has no real business in Vietnam? Yes. However, The spread of communism will spread even further and beyond Indochina and into Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the the rest of South East Asia. Vietnam was the chokehold to postpone the spread and it was not the cure.
Sun Tzu said: "Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat."
Don't invade countries that got nothing to do w your country
@@RT-bt5ql Someone had to cleanup the french mess. They're fond of leaving messes around the globe.
@@KonglomeratYTcleaned up the french mess and created bigger mess 🥱
Salute to general giap
Lies again? App Store AVN SaiGon
Cause we shouldn’t have been there to begin with.
100% percent. The war was doomed to fail from the start.
things Reddit tells us for $100, Alex 😅
Communist International radicals shouldn't have been there to begin with.
@@GeneralBlorplol no Reddit has suddenly shifted into saying that the US had to be in Vietnam and that the 2003 Iraq war was justified, and bush is hecking wholesome. Get on with the times grandpa 😅
One sentence, four errors.
Do better.
I'm hyped for the next episode. I always wanted to know more about the post-US Vietnam War
the outlook for the next three Vietnam episodes is:
- a deeper analysis of the US/South defeat as well as the Fall of Saigon (late June)
- Vietnam War: Forgotten Armies which will look at the non-US and non-Vietnamese armies in the conflict (summer)
- Vietnam War: Forgotten Fronts which will look at Cambodia, Laos and also include the short Sino-Vietnamese War (fall)
@@realtimehistory thanks for sharing!
@@realtimehistorythanks.
@@realtimehistory Looking forward to this series "Vietnam War: Forgotten Fronts"!
@@realtimehistory 3 more videos?!?! Wow fantastic!!
Thank you for continuing to cover The Vietnam war. It is still a very sore subject here in the US. So many history TH-camrs won't touch it.
Economic effects indicate that LBJ understood after 1967,
that the cost of the Conflict was larger than any returns from exploiting Minerals or Oil,
could provide US Investors.
When the possibility of appropriating money for a War on Poverty became unaffordable,
Johnson's re-election chances appeared to dim.
The program was intended to fulfill Johnson's boyhood dream of eliminating poverty.
The Money was used up delivering payments to Brown & Root for infrastructure construction in Nam.
The clear implications of colonial conflicts that cost more,
than they could produce any return on investment,
appeared to make the continuation unaffordable.
The incentive for continuation of the conflict was over by 1968.
I wonder why that is. 🤔
Plus, they would do a horrible job of covering it. Just regurgitating clichés and false narratives from the new left boomer generation, who still view their opposition to the war as some great achievement of theirs while they further ruin the country at home in other areas.
@@danielhutchinson6604 Many say it had no gain. it definitely helped Russia go bankrupt, that and the space race. Today's Vietnam still has the US footprint, I believe the economy is setup more like China's.
@@kleamatwar crimes plus losing
I was a Vietnam Veteran before it became popular!
Iron Triangle 1969
Thank you for your service.
@@jasonpalacios1363
🙏🪖🇺🇸
@@jasonpalacios1363 service? killing civilians = a service???
@@MD72538 The Russian are doing a lot of that in Ukraine , i'm sure you don't think so!
@@jaypaige7550 stay on topic! If you want to switch, what about Iraq, Afghnistan and now Gaza?
Always a pleasure to watch. Fascinating and enthralling, as always! Thank you so much.
Funnily enough, I just read an article about Vietnam a few days ago. According to the article, the USSR and China sent insane amounts of aid to North Vietnam, to the point that the bombing campaign by the US was essentially useless, since they couldn't disrupt the flow of supplies, and there were no manufacturing centers to destroy.
Interesting point. Yeah, when you have two empire-sized superpowers behind you, you can pull impressive feats like beating the USA. Wow.
they ran into the same problem in Korea
Except the resources poured into NV was dwarfed by the amount poured into by US.
@@huntermad5668All that resources meant nothing if their not being used properly and where they'd count like multi-purpose F4 Phantoms for the Vietnamese Republic Air Force.
@@huntermad5668 US poured in a lot but as it was explained in the video the South Vitenamese were not trained enough to use it to its full potential.
Great outtro to a fine episode as always.
I'm usmc viet vet left Dec 1972 the country was in great shape then
It was torn by civil war.
Navy Vet here, I have two brother in laws, both Viet Nam Vets who served right after Tet, one who did two tours, who would disagree with you on that.
@@kenkahre9262in 1972 South Vietnam was fine, this was literally when South Vietnam was on the offensive, the Tet Offensive was a failure and was in 1968 so it really bares no relevance to this guys original statement.
Great Video! Hoping they would make a video about the Battle of Ia Drang.
In Vietnam, we watched all the battles and I personally learned about each battle from many different sides. Ia drang was a sacrificial battle to consume American manpower and it was very terrible.
Siempre se agradece esta serie documental, sigan así 👍
This is an awesome channel with first rate content. Thanks so much!
Super wonderful historical coverage episode shared by an excellent ( RTH) channel... thanks for sharing 👍🏻
My dad fought for the South, but you know how he was "drafted". He said the army rolled into his village in the early morning, kicked down doors and dragged out every male who looked near service age and tossed them in trucks. Congratulations, they're in the army now.
Sounds like Ukraine’ now
Sorry, but the North Vietnamese side is the same. Even when they are only 13 years old, they are forced to join the army. What is advertised as voluntary is actually because their families are too poor and their families will be subsidized to join the army, so they go. Most of the children of officials above do not go to the battlefield. but were sent to study in the Soviet Union and China, most of them on the battlefield were commanders or not in suicide assault teams.
@thaophamthanh440 Need a source for that bud. For now this just sounds like salty US revenge propaganda.
@@ucanhvungoc7133 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21624887.2022.2073740
research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/32163/1/POL_thesis_NguyenM_2022.pdf
Salty? I don’t think so
@@thaophamthanh440Khmer Separatists propaganda. You have zero proof of this.
Amazing outro, as usual!
You have to be kidding someone
LBJ, early after the build-up whined to his military that he could not understand why the North Vietnamese did not just back off under American pressure. One military staffer said that the situation was deeply rooted in the history of that place. LBJ lost his temper and said... "I don't want to hear any history...we have American boys being killed." Like a surgeon refusing to listen to why he needed to disinfect his surgical instruments prior to an operation. Vanishing hope for a positive outcome... YP
It is quite interesting that the Vietnamization programs were similar to the Americanization efforts of the American Revolution. Both Great Britain and the United States had to allocate resources to other conflicts as well as face political pressures from home, which required the use of locally raised troops to bear the brunt of the fighting and to hopefully pacify the populations. With the American Revolution, Great Britain's efforts came crashing down after the Battle of King's Mountain where Britain's best recruitment officer, Major Patrick Ferguson, was killed and his entire force of 900-1,100 men was annihilated. The United States' own major attempt to push ARVN to bear the brunt of the war in the first real test of its capabilities proved to be an unmitigated disaster during Operation Lam Son 719. And though the programs would continue with some mixed results, the fact was that this campaign was a major red flag for how ARVN would handle itself during future operations.
Defending one’s homeland cannot be compared to fighting for political ideology
In fact, that campaign was exposed because North Vietnamese communist insiders were deeply embedded within ARVN. If the campaign was successful, it would have been a strong blow to the North Vietnamese communists
@@BufordTGleason if that’s your faulty logic, the Cham people were there longer than any Vietnamese, North or South. Both oppressed them.
@@BufordTGleasonThey were fighting for their homeland.
@@ucnguyenanh9414 The secret sauce is that the North very cleverly had a massive public aid program thanks to Russian and Chinese imported food, medicine etc. Despite there being a war on, the people in the North saw their life continue to improve as the gouvernment kept delivering food, medicine and actively worked to build schools, hospitals and other ammenities. They may have been little more than rickety bamboo structures, but they had nothing before that under the French and Japanese.
Now after the war things got a bit more messy as the gouvernment became more authoritiarian and had to deal with the people in the South. Left a bitter aftertaste, just like sidelining many of the people who had contributed to the ultimate victory like Giap and some who were too close to China when those relations became a bit dodgy.
During the war many people saw clear improvement to their lives, so they figured "This is worth fighting for." After that, things were a bit more nuanced.
Thank you.
I've watched a lot of content on the Vietnam War and this is very condensed and well presented, Also, it contains photos I've never seen before and that's always interesting.
I have lived here in Vietnam for 3 years in the North as an English teacher. Living history as both a US veteran and someone who loves history and wants to understand both sides
I am writing this in my wife's living room in District 12 Saigon. This is my 5th trip since 2020. I was told that Vietnamese do not want to talk about the "American War". People ask me if this is my first visit to Vietnam and I tell them my first was in 1970 for one year. I am 76 years old American male so it is obvious I fought in the war. The only response was from a young waiter who said "Oh Before Freedom". The only Vietnamese I have talked to about the war live in the US. I never leave the house without my POW bracelet on, my wife is the only one that has ever asked me about it.
My Great Grandpa was in the 1st Infantry Division during Vietnam. Yes, Great Grandpa. I'm younger and the Vietnam War is starting to get that old now. He saw his draft number coming up and figured he'd join as an MP, however was deployed on the front after partying with alcohol, and became an M60 Machine Gunner in the big red one. He got a purple heart after being hit by an enemy sniper (whether it's VC or NVA is unknown) as he didn't talk about it. Thankfully it missed most vital organs (including the spine), passing through his torso from the stomach out the back. Richard "Papa Lee" Hagan lived a long, happy life afterwards. However he never sought VA counsel, so around the end of his life he separated and lived alone in a cabin. The war haunted him until he passed in that cabin, but he had his dog Taco and neighbors checking every now and then. Rest in Peace, Papa Lee. Always missed.
aka Big Red One. I was part of the forward division in West Germany late 80's. Got reassigned stateside, my 1SG was a 1st ID Vietnam vet. Doesn't seem that long ago to me!
@@mikegreenguitar I was thinking of putting their nickname, but it felt tasteless here.
Great video
Fascinating history.
Nguyen is pronounced "Win", not "New ee in".
So true, I made this same mistake for 50 years. I had to marry a Nguyen to get it correct.
Nah, not even close.
The reason why Europeans and Westerners fought wars in the jungles of the Pacific region is difficult. Because of Western methods of fighting and Europe as a weak point, by not secretly, hiding, or using guerrilla warfare. The same is true for Vietnamese and Thai people The people of South Asia are forest experts and therefore have an advantage
I've seen lots of Vietnam War videos on here over the years, but few offering the unique approach and perspective and presentation, of yours. I have long felt that most American politicians knew that the Vietnam War was unwinnable after the Tet Offensive (and so much more) so what had been said after was mostly about politics and gaining the approval of the American public and winning elections. I too, had questioned the statement that the Christmas bombings were the sole reason that the North Vietnamese had returned to the negotiating table.
Can you guys do a possible episode about Malayan Emergency? Or the Suez Crisis
Love that you present the facts and events as they happened and don't put a political spin or bias on it. The comment section does that for you guys haha
Who doesn't like to spin a bias? You go first
Just curious, did the views go up, and the hate comments go down after you changed the title from Lost to Left?
Excellent Video. It should have many more Views. Its a shame how youtube doenst support such formats more.
It really was a weapons test imo but I could be wrong. I mean especially in the air war we put guns back on fighters after the horrid performance of the f-4 without guns lol
Do a video on the US leaving Afghanistan next! Very similar situation.
Ask mr joe
In vn war that time biden did that too
We have to get our war on some place. Perhaps we will visit Africa nexr.
Nixon’s foreign policy was all about a sharing of defensive responsibilities with states that the US had treaties with. The US didn’t have a treaty with South Vietnam and therefore Vietnamization was his policy to withdraw. Additionally, the Paris Peace Accords were prolonged by the NVA. Nixon’s response to bring North Vietnam to the negotiating table was to resume bombing of North Vietnam with Operations Linebacker I and II.
LOL, NV already accepted the conditions, that was Thieu refused those conditions
I actually blame that slippery snake Kissinger for most of Nixon's disastrous Vietnam policy.
You are correct.
@@markgarrett3647 it wasn’t a disaster.
@@robertortiz-wilson1588 The Vietnamese boat people who fled by the millions beg to differ.
Great work! Go on.
What has always bothered me is that we were at war with north vietnam yet we never really entered the north. Bombing alone can not stop an enemy
I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
Appreciate that you are willing to take a stab at the Vietnam war. It's still a living memory so there is a lot of debates and what if scenarios such as whether North Vietnam could be defeated if the decision was to keep US troops. It also really calls into question of US policy of supporting unpopular governments for the sake of containing communism.
Can you do 1812 and vicksburg?
rename the title to why the US LOST vietnam, stop coping son. the game is up
Yeah, nah. They lost the battle of Vietnam, but won the Cold War. And Vietnam was but one theatre of the cold war..it sux, I know. But it is what it is.🙁
@@andrewthomas695 Then basically the France used the US as their pawn in Indochina it seems, that gotta suck.
My kind of mental hospital!
I laughed out loud when he said "occasionally gets mistaken for a mental hospital"
It's important to note other aspects of the change in US policy. Bombing runs in the North had been systematic, predictable, and ineffective. The general military strategy was killing more than were lost rather than securing territory. Troops were repeatedly put into massive battles for the same territory over and over again, and when they needed air support, they would have to get permission from those all the way back in Washington. Furthermore, the media coverage following the Tet Offensive was completely biased against the war even though it marked essentially the end of the Viet Cong.
Furthermore, the political situation was the worst it had been. The racial tensions, peak drug use, and the highest support for Communism all contributed to a defeatist attitude. There were many elites who believed that Communism would win the Cold War. This view was strong on college campuses as many young men stayed in college to avoid the draft.
You gotta go easy on the American military since they faced a lot of restrictions on how and where they could conduct the War but what would have helped was LBJ blockading the Communist ports along the Gulf of Tonkin and the Cambodian port of Sihanoukville.
That’s not a defeatist attitude, it’s understanding the reality of the situation that you should never have been in the first place. The Americans failed to understand what the Vietnamese struggle was about beyond just hearing the word communism. So they were basically fighting a war with the wrong understanding. Do you want the American friendly brutal raging in the south, or the non-American friendly brutal raging in the north. For the people on the ground, there’s not much difference. And it all came out of an national independence movement which just happened to be communist.
One can not fight a war by way of political input which skews the overall goal to the troops who become confused of "Why We Fight."
9:05 Bamboo pentagon, lol.
Me when I realize this presenter and OverSimplified are the same guy:
"The truth is that the US won the war militarily but the US lost the war politically" as what Thomas Sowell said.
What would the US have won??
@@davidbradley3735 In other words there was no support of the war back home, so no support at home, you lose war, period.
@@jasonpalacios1363Well, duh. When you throw away a large numbers of lives and tax money to some country half the globe away that wouldn't threat your national security, people back home aren't going to appreciate it.
@@jasonpalacios1363Mỹ đã không thể đẩy lùi lực lượng Việt cộng ra khỏi Miền Nam Việt Nam. Bạn gọi đó là chiến thắng hả ?
@@jasonpalacios1363 so can you use that point to the Afghanistan war too? why us silently gone from that war and even get full support from the government every year with multi billion dollar support... so its meaning losing right?
Right then. That's my dad on the right of the photo with the M-16 on his shoulder.
Hello do you plan to continue napoleon's downfall with the 1814 campaign?
Remember Free Birds, if the deal you sign after the fight remain much the same thing you rejected before, no matter how big you making up, you lost that fight
You're made-up rules aside, yes indeed, the Vietnamese ultimately lost that fight and were defeated. Now Vietnamese have to have a giant Lenin statue pointing at them everyday. Oh well, Vietnam lost but they did at least win the next war when China invaded.
@@topsuperseven7910 uh, come again, what is your evidence for the argument of VN losing ? And how come America have to sign the deal they rejected before could be considered a victory, Free Bird ?
@@vinhucnguyen2575 hello, the 'evidence' would be when the Vietcong rebels surged into Saigon and took full control and Vietnam surrendered.
It's in this video.
Vietnam most definitely lost.
Remember, if you sign a deal you considered a victory but rejected before it means it was a victory before.
Mind you, the US wasn't interested in signing 'Victory' for Vietnam but rather anything that they hoped would keep both sides from continued fighting.
It was temporarily successful but of course the traitors ignored it and went on to defeat Vietnam.
@@topsuperseven7910 So you agree that not only the US had their puppet regime of South Vietnam fallen and have to withdraw their forces from VN ( which definitely sound like a loss), but also was acting treacherously and cowardly when leaving the Saigon government on the hand of the Vietnamese despite being its founder and claiming how the war must happened because the US need to protect its allies and interest in Vietnam ?
@@vinhucnguyen2575 Being forced to signing a peace treaty to end a war sounds a lot like losing to me, and that's what happened with NV. Just cause NV decided to invade again a year later doesn't mean they "won" the prior war. They were fighting a completely unsupported SV lol.
It's almost like wars against ideas can't be won🤔🤦♀️
Top tier presentation.
That does it! Viktor no longer on Klaus and Ursula's "People to Let Live" list.
at least the military industrial complex benefited from the warcrimes 🥰🥰🥰
that's all that matters
Hardly much sympathy when you’re fighting a side also committing war crimes.
and how much money did they make from the my lai massacre?
Investments in aviation paid out big dolla dolla bills 🤑
@@robertortiz-wilson1588 if believing that makes you feel better, sure
@@Hys-01 you have your coping narratives, but I don’t need them.
The US just never had a proper plan for South Vietnam. They concentrated on the military part and made no real effort on the nation building part. Aside from being afraid of the communist north's wrath and not wanting to live in an oppressive regime the south-vietnamese didn't have any love for their own state as it was only a different shade of oppressive. Why should you fight tooth and nail for a country you have no love for, that doesn't provide for you in any meaningful capacity and that is unstable at best?
And the sad part is they made the same mistake again three decades later in Afghanistan.
chiếu đấu cho 1 đất nước mình không yêu mến . Không phải đâu. Vì US muốn ngăn chặn làn sóng đỏ từ trung quốc nga xô tràn xuống đông nam á sau VN là Lào. CAMBODIA. THAI LAN. PHILIPIN. NEWZILAND. USTRAYLIA. Do đó VN là tiền đồn ngăn chặn làn sóng cộng sản đỏ
Dont be silly It was for making profits And boy did they made money YAHOO
Afghanistan was different. There was tons of money for infrastructure and internal civilian programs poured in. The population outside of a few cities didn’t see what was so great about them and felt a huge disconnect over their necessity.
Because most of the Southern population were all Communists symphathizer, not because they love communism, frankly only the anti-communists in the country give a s**t about ideology, but the communists were actually the one who fought against the French while the South Vietnam gov was formed by the people who fought for the French. To top it of this "South Vietnam" secceding half of their country and blew up the chance for the country to be reunited by the general election that should have been held in 1956. So it's no wonder few Vietnamese had any love for the Separatists.
@@robertortiz-wilson1588bro the U.S. heavily collaborated local war lords in afghanistan who were so bad the locals perferred rule under the taliban than that
This content is gold❤
Just emphasizing how wasted South Vietnam Army was: The captured equipments have been repurposed to fight against the Pol Pot regime even Red Khmer was just nothing but the ashes in 1985. And those captured equipments were about to last "in few month" under South Vietnam's estimation.
Score board
Who caused more torture or damage, North Vietnamese or the U.S.?
US for sure, they started thís war.
09:38 Historical fact: The Jackson State killings were not related to the war in Southeast Asia.
This tragedy happened 11 days after the Kent State killings and is sometimes considered part the anti war protest movement but it actually was part of the civil rights struggle.
The only thing these two events really have in common is overreaction by authorities to campus unrest.
Some argue that the reason Kent State is more infamous is because it was white students that were murdered and Jackson State would hardly be remembered otherwise.
Same situation as Afghanistan. They were unwinnable situations.
And not a damn thing was learned
Surely we learned from Afghanistan now. Surely.
You don’t even understand the conflict.
@@robertortiz-wilson1588 It is complicated with only 4th grade...
Our enemies learned.
@@Karlach_ If you think wars over politics can impart lessons then you know nothing about Republics. Go back to school lmao. Elections drive decision-making. Not history.
To any Vietnam veterans who might see this comment, do you feel we should have stayed and continued the misson? As a gwot veteran, there's a sizeable amount of us who believe we should have stayed in Afghanistan. For both wars, all that blood and treasure for nothing more than some improved ttps and growing the bank accounts of war profiteers.
Big question should be, could South Vietnam have survived(like South Korea) without too many US troops on the ground.
Why is this 'Nixon's Vietnam War'? More accurate to say 'Kennedy's War' He got us involved. Under him, US troop strength hit 23K - he also gave us the Bay of Pigs disaster.
see previous episodes for our coverage of that part of the war
Kennedy want to get out of Vietnam after he had won the 1964 election but history went differently.
It's a holiday in Cambodia! It's tough, kid, but it's life! It's a holiday in Cambodia! Don't forget to pack a wife!
Nixon is a fascinating president
6:57 sounds so eerily similar to Afghanistan
"How A peasant Nation humbled a Superpower."
Is that it?
Yeah,that's it.
The USA won almost every single battle in Vietnam. If China and the USSR wasn't supplying the Viet Cong then the USA would've starved them out.
Despite this, the USA killed millions of Viet Cong and the Viet Cong couldn't Even kill a single 100k of US soldiers.
Imagine have Superiority of Air Force and Infantry
Already loss to Bunch of farmer or peasants troops while Some are veteran of Indochina
USA didnt leave they were kicked out
You have no idea what you’re talking about the US could have defended Saigon indefinitely
BS. I did 2 tours in Vietnam. In 1970 VC and NVA didn't initiate any fight in daylight because they would die. The could only hope to survive at night with hit and run. Our problem was finding them when they ran away.
This war was such a disaster.
Am i dumb or did i watch this on nebula already?
Nixon the goat
It's amazing that the U.S. govt ended up making the exact same mistakes 30 years later in Afghanistan/Iraq. Especially considering that some of them were guys who experienced the war firsthand.
When you consider that they rose the ranks by being Yes Men, it isn't amazing at all.
It's not mistakes. War is business
@@houm7571And US lost profits in this war
Gi..discover Pattaya beach... when he get holiday..and now Pattaya is famous beach in the world.
The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who's going to stop me? - Ayn Rand
I'm sure that thought goes through every criminals mind just before they commit a crime.
bc we got bored
Ironically a war of attrition that backfired
Because you got clapped hard!
It's a fascinating and tragic story because the US knew they lost, but didn't want to pay the political and reputational consequences for losing. But they did anyway, and did so after the cost of more US and Vietnamese lives alike.
Sunk cost fallacy...
The defeat was never inevitable and it took all of the pro-Communists within the Federal government and the MSM to produce it.
That was Kissinger‘s suspected opinion. In reality though, I don’t think it actually was his opinion. I think that’s what partisan historians and journalists have attributed as his thought process at the time when that wasn’t the case.
Ego won't let the leaders admit to wrongdoing and everyone suffers
We didn't lose
During mid 50s, Soviet conflicted against China over who should be the leader of Communist World, leading to a border clash in 1969. Acknowledging that Soviet was a bigger threat, US secretly cooperated with China in order to isolate and topple the Union. (which eventually resulted in its dissolution in 1991). To swap their benefits, US withdrew from Vietnam and let South Vietnamese fight alone so that the South is faster and more easily to lose this war. From 1972-1973, ARVN had to rely on themselves and kept fighting against North Vietnam and their communist allies. Simply put, they used whatever ammos and weapons left. This was not included Long Bình Depot which was locked by US before withdrawing.
1974's Battle of Paracels was a test to see whether US had completely abandoned South Vietnam or not.
No win war no one is going to give there country away without a fight
A correct title would be "why US was defeated in Vietnam"
but this episode is only part of that. we will do a full analysis in a future video
Yeah maybe. "The USA failed to achieve our political and military goals" is the truth. But there was a certain amount of scheming combined with the stark truth being realized that, if the South Vietnamese were given every chance, every American resource including human blood, and billions of dollars, yet STILL was incapable of defeating the communists in the north, then there was no point for the US to prop them up any longer.
The reasons why the US lost the war are numerous and sometimes contradictory, but in a nutshell, this is what someone once said to me about US involvement in Vietnam: "We couldn't win, but we refused to lose."
the correct title should be "here's why the my lai massacre acstually happened, trust us" also here's a more accurate title "here's how the ARVN was defeated in Vietnam"
@@grdfhrghrggrtwqqudo you doubt the historicity of the My Lai Massacre?!
Nixon's Vietnam War? Nixon had to clean up LBJs mess!
nothing about the shape of the negotiating table.
It cost an awful a lot of money to keep an army halfway around the world for 11 years. By that time, it was clear there would be no victory
The My Lai massacre, and the widespread support for its perpetrators in the US, is something that I wish more Americans knew about. Most would rather forget all of the horrors of Vietnam, the millions of Vietnamese who died because a foreign power felt entitled to determine the country's political system and government. After the horrible crimes committed by Russian forces in Bucha during the invasion of Ukraine, many American commentators wondered how the Russian people could support an army which murdered innocent civilians. Sadly the answer can be found in America's own history, but the refusal to remember and learn from history makes that impossible.
The video didn't mention it, but several US soldiers who attempted to stop the killing, and helped hide Vietnamese civilians during the My Lai massacre, were ostracized and shunned within the Army. They were also called traitors by a multiple US Congressmen from both parties. It wasn't until 30 years after the war crime was committed that these soldiers were recognized for their attempts to help innocent civilians during wartime. Unfortunately very similar war crimes were later committed by American soldiers in Iraq, further demonstrating the cost of refusing to remember such crimes, or to properly bring war criminals to justice. Hopefully this channel and videos like this can make a small difference in fixing this problem, though a real solution needs to take place at a much larger, societal scale.
What do you think you’re babbling about? This almost sounds peak millennial.
@@robertortiz-wilson1588 It's called history. I'd encourage you to learn more about it, though it will require you to read a book, which you might consider a "peak millennial" waste of time. But I have to thank you at the same time, as you provided an excellent example of the refusal to confront difficult moments from US history. It's much easier for people to reach for juvenile insults than to actually reflect on what happened in places like My Lai.
@@zvexevz there you go again.
@@robertortiz-wilson1588 Yes, and there YOU go again as well.
@@zvexevzthe prison Abu gharib torture and its link to the birth of ISIS ,it seems USA orchestrat many problems in the part of world where significant regional power is not present sometimes i think that is why they fear the nuclear arms spreading , you don’t see USA taking steps against north korea except some sanctions and mouth blabbering.
We left because of politicians🤦🏻♂️
Their constituents told them that this was B.S.
@@SandfordSmythe the loud ones.
With due respect to those who fought the unpopular war. Soldiers obey, and politicians dictate all for nothing. It was deemed other people's war.
Kinda like why dude left his old job, didn't feel right to hang around after I got fired. Or rather the company I was working for got taken over by North Vietnam
What a disappointment, the Tet offensive gets a whole video dedicated to the subject but the Easter Offensive is reduced to a footnote despite it’s significant impact on the 1973 ceasefire and it’s interesting way of war, the most conventional of the entire war and the deadliest land invasion since the Chinese offensive in the Korean War.
I guess western historians cannot escape heavily portraying the “Vietnam” war from the “American” perspective which had been regurgitated over and over again in most history outlets.
However I do understand that it’s easier and safer to do a subject that’s statistically popular to portray and understand for a content creation channel.
I agree with you to a degree. I agree it should’ve been its own episode.
They will continue to cover the other more conventional parts of Vietnam from 1973-75, the third Indochina War and other battles
Hello, please use the correct term "Lost" in the name of the video. Thanks!
Won? never happened
The actual Northern Victory and the analysis why will happen in the next video, this video is about the decision to withdraw ground troops. Which didn't completely end US involvement.
I don't know why you say the 1968 election was closely contested. Even with Wallace spoiling Nixon had many more electoral votes.
There is nothing to "win" there...
Us.army no defeated in Vietnam..but politics in Washington defeated in the war..I am 66 year old from Thailand.😂
It certainly was certainly worn down. What's an army if their own soldiers and public are unwilling to support its actions? Well, it's a morally defeated army. It doesn't help that South Vietnam was itself a corpse eating away at itself, thus why it failed to even launch proper or successful military offensives against the North.
It should be noted that Thailand contributed much to the Vietnam War.
@@SandfordSmythe sorry my English very poor..ขอตอบเป็นภาษาไทยนะครับ/ไทยยืนข้างอเมริกันในสงครามเย็นที่เวียดนามใต้ ส่งทหารไปร่วมรบเคียงบ่าร่วมกับพันธมิตรในเวียดนามใต้..ให้อเมริกันมีฐานบืน (US.Airbase)หลายแห่งในประเทศ..มันเป็นการเลือกข้างระหว่างฝ่ายเสรีประชาธิปไตยกับฝ่ายคอมมิวนิสต์/เมื่อสงครามสงบ คนเวียดนามเกลียดไทยมาก หาว่าไทยเป็นลูกน้องอเมริกา.. และในวันนี้ไทยมีความเจริญ.มากกว่าเวียดนามและสหายคอมมิวนิสต์....คนหนุ่มสาวเวียดนามพากันมาเที่ยวไทยเป็นจำนวนมากในวันนี้ ..
@@user-lw6gy9xm8lBây giờ Việt Nam đang thịnh vượng hơn Thái Lan mới đúng. Việt Nam vượt trội hơn Thái Lan về công nghiệp lẫn nông nghiệp trong khi Thái Lan hòa bình và độc lập hơn 100 năm. Việt Nam không ghét Thái Lan, Thái Lan chưa bao giờ là đối thủ để Việt Nam cạnh tranh.
@@user-lw6gy9xm8lDu lịch Thái Lan đang bị Việt Nam bắt kịp, công nghiệp và nông nghiệp Việt Nam đã vượt trội Thái Lan rất xa. GDP thực của Thái Lan thấp hơn Việt Nam từ hồi năm 2020. 😂😂😂😂😂
*North Vietnam turns communist*
US: hall nah that's not ok
*gets into a war it can't win and then loses*
People: well lets just hope they won't do some thing like this again
US: about that 🤭
It wasn't that we couldn't win, it was that we weren't allowed to win because of politics, don't be disingenuous.
@@georgefalcon14 Yeah, I know it's a tough pill to swallow but the US were beaten in Vietnam. Gotta take the L on this one, I'm afraid.
@@heycidskyja4668 yeah many historians agree that, the was going to loss this war because of the fact that the the vietnamese had home field advantage
It wasn’t that we couldn’t win, we actually had won quite a bit in the north. But if you don’t have support from the domestic population then you’re not going to be able to sustain the war effort. The United States far and away could have won the Vietnam War as we had nuclear weapons and a vast technological advantage alongside superior tactics. The problem was nobody at home wanted to fight the war and thus America pulled out
@@heycidskyja4668 I said we lost, but reading comprehension seems to have eluded you, maybe take the W and research the truth of "Why," instead of just jumping on the defeatist bandwagon 🤔
Vietnam had two purposes: First, to test the weapons and strategies of the Military Industrial complex. It was a laboratory for new tactics, weapon systems and equipment. Second it was to siphon off excess population that might otherwise turn to discontented politicizing back home due to lack of jobs and opportunities. The Soviet inspired anti-war sentiment basically put paid to that latter intent. High school students approaching draft age and college students approaching graduation were eager participants in protesting a deadly game they didn't see as having any purpose in their interest.
The Democrats abandoned the South Vietnamese. They refused to sell them arms and armaments, just about the same time they began shutting down the Space Program. That money was needed to promote their welfare state and buy the black vote in particular for the Democrats for the next 30 years.
22:09 weird pause
Intefering a foreign country, killing protesters, massacring civilians, breaking promises, chaotic strategy due to political system, and bringing back home drug addicts with PTSDs. Truly a beacon of light for all human beings.
Unfortunately tho, Korea wasn't able to reunite under one flag. I wonder how things would have been for them.
Have you seen Vietnam today?
@@user-td2jw9ze2cviệt nam giờ sao? Tao sống ở việt nam đây. Hòa bình và thoải mái.
You have been listening to too much propaganda
Neither Kim or any South Korean defeated the Japanese. Ho Chi Minh led the Vietnamese people to victory agaisnt the French, while the "Southern" pretenders fought along side the French.
There's the difference.
@@ArtSmosh1274same as yours
And you will be happy to know Vietnam is now just another little capitalist country and doing very well too. We know why the US left I want to know why you were there in the first place
Vietnam is a socialist republic still lead by the communist party of vietnam.
Vietnam chose capitalism by choice, US had no role in it.
Yes communism failed economically in Vietnam. I am writing this from my wife's living room in District 12 Saigon. Last night I had a Big Mac, french fries and a Coka Cola the McDonald's next to the Dairy Queen. There are about a dozen McDonald's in Saigon. The Communist is still in power but capitalism runs the economy. BTW a Big Mac, regular hamburger, 2 orders of fries and 2 Cokes cost 138,000 Dong. You can look up conversion to US$
@@bboomermike2126 Vietnam politics is hybrid of socialism-capitalism. Communism only in name!
@@bboomermike2126 Communism failed economically, but won militaristically as we defeated France and US then reunified the nation.
Left/loss same thing?
Is a waste of time no cruel oil nothing only today we talk about investment.