Are Vintage Boutique BASSES worth the HYPE, or is it BS?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 490

  • @devinebass
    @devinebass  ปีที่แล้ว +72

    *PLEASE READ* - It's come to our attention that there are some commenters on our videos who are trying to scam our subscribers with offers of free gifts and message requests. None of these comments are official or from us. We will never reach out via the comments of a social media channel. We're doing our best to remove the comments and flag the accounts in question!

    • @markblackstad8705
      @markblackstad8705 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No worries, just send me one of the Ken Smiths and we're all good!

  • @Tethys213
    @Tethys213 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    It hurts to know that a bass made in 1999 is now considered vintage. I feel so old.

    • @zsoltbocsi7546
      @zsoltbocsi7546 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      i dont think that those are vintage at all

    • @The_sinner_Jim_Whitney
      @The_sinner_Jim_Whitney ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No shit! I have like five basses that are older than 2000, and I never think of them as 'old'. I guess that's because I myself am kinda old (37).

    • @shanemichaelneal648
      @shanemichaelneal648 ปีที่แล้ว

      Man for real

    • @valeriegoulettalbot9900
      @valeriegoulettalbot9900 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have my dad’s Aria bass that he bought in like 1982, would they consider it an antique then? 😅

    • @attilathehun5904
      @attilathehun5904 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@valeriegoulettalbot9900 I"ve got a real antique - Framus Star bass I bought from a friend in 1969.

  • @dannaaa330
    @dannaaa330 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    I feel like the 1999 bass has a more focused and mid-range sound, while the 2021 has a touch more low end and a bit more bite in the higher notes, tonewise i think i prefer the newer model, but they both sound incredible.

  • @VeitLehmann
    @VeitLehmann ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I actually feel the same as you, found the '99 a tiny bit more open and rich sounding. However, your '21 has a bit more bite. But what impressed me the most is that the differences were really subtle which tells a lot about the consistence these things deliver - over decades! Enjoy your new bass!

    • @BourdeoixEterno
      @BourdeoixEterno ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Honestly, strings, how you attack the strings and all of that could make a difference

    • @JettoDz
      @JettoDz ปีที่แล้ว

      To me, all I heard was the same bass... but "in context", somehow? '99 felt like it fitted better in all the tunes, but the more pronounced tone in de '21 made me think that they are actually the same... It's pretty damn wild. I'm confused haha

    • @Vykk_Draygo
      @Vykk_Draygo ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BourdeoixEterno Pickup height too. And the fact that the electronics are different. In order of tonal effect: pickups, pickup height and electronics, then strings.

  • @alexanderlyon
    @alexanderlyon ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I couldn't tell a difference. Maybe I should listen again with my eyes closed. Either way, they both sounded amazing.

  • @adamdixon6326
    @adamdixon6326 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I like the way the 2021 tone way better. It does sound modern but I like the way the sound cuts and blends with the music

  • @ronallen2458
    @ronallen2458 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I like the ‘21. It has such a good roundness to its tone.

  • @alecrisser12
    @alecrisser12 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I'm glad to see some six string love. They're still relatively new and often dismissed as a novelty. They're just now becoming old enough to be vintage. They really are the ultimate Basses.

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We love a six string here at SBL!

    • @ClearStreamsUK
      @ClearStreamsUK ปีที่แล้ว

      P bass 1951 to first Ken Smith 6 string string 1981, 30 years
      1981 to now, 42 years.
      Not so new any more!

    • @alecrisser12
      @alecrisser12 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ClearStreamsUK I believe you're talking about something like a squire VI, which is basically a baritone, not a modern contrabass guitar. I'm always eager to learn. Can you send me some links?

    • @ClearStreamsUK
      @ClearStreamsUK ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alecrisser12 not really, as I said The first Ken Smith wide spacing 6 string Contrabass for Anthony Jackson was in 1981. The P bass was 1951. A difference of 30 years. The 6 string Contra has now been established for over 40 years. 10 years longer than the 4 string lived before the 6 string. So in my book no longer a newcomer.
      I wasn't even thinking about the early 6 string fender or the squier copy.

  • @xtoby44x
    @xtoby44x ปีที่แล้ว +38

    It’s all in the preamp voltage 18v is brighter which is what you are hearing. Livens up the tapping segment, but the 9v’s gives you that darker/sweeter more mid focused sound. It’s a subtle difference but a difference nonetheless. Great video, Ian. Ken Smith is a living legend, the Bass community owes him a debt of gratitude for his contributions.

    • @angelarnaudas
      @angelarnaudas ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I pretty much agreed that's the preamp making most of the difference between them. More than the woods' config imho

    • @wavyseahill
      @wavyseahill ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Can You explain how a different signal headroom can make sound brighter/darker? Doesn't make sense to me, because you most probably can hook up two 9V batteries to the 9V preamp and filters wouldn't change, only thing that will change is the level at which it starts clipping the signal. Another thing - if they get 3 wires from batteries to preamp (0, and +-9V), then You can get rid of bypass capacitors at the input and output, which could have been cutting off some very low frequencies, but it shouldn't make it brighter because of that.

    • @johnb.wessels2115
      @johnb.wessels2115 ปีที่แล้ว

      To my ears the newer bass sounds deeper. I like that

  • @bthonk
    @bthonk ปีที่แล้ว +7

    i love the new model. i think that the hype about older basses only applies to a certain few (thanks leo)

  • @rogermiller2742
    @rogermiller2742 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I prefer the sound of the 2021. It sounds a little fuller/deeper to my ears. Great video.

  • @DMWeekes90
    @DMWeekes90 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Cool video. I can never get over how different these basses sound on their own and in the mix of a track. Never cared for the solo tone but the way these sit in the mix is just KILLER. Same is true for Stringrays IMO. 1999 has my vote in this instance though.

    • @IanMartinAllison
      @IanMartinAllison ปีที่แล้ว

      Man I agree! Love how they feel inside a track.

  • @michaeladamspmp
    @michaeladamspmp ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I agree with danna3309. The newer model has more pop and the lows have more growl.
    I have a slight preference for that.
    I don't think we can make any conclusions about the wood, however.
    I think this is easily attributable to the difference in pre-amp.
    I purchased a 6-string Schecter studio and my kid broke a pickup.
    I replaced the pickups and pre-amp with Aguilar's and it sounds AMAZING, now.

  • @junkyardjoerowland
    @junkyardjoerowland ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sound-wise, for me it's all about context. I prefer the 2021 on the gospel song; it's got more focus to the lows and bit more pronounced top end that I think compliments that song better. Same with the Dream Theater track; it jumps out more on the 2021. I like the '99 better for the slap stuff, tho. Which is kinda weird because I feel like the '99 is more mid-focused, which is the opposite of what most people go for with a slap sound. Verdict: They're both killer basses, and they both sound like Smiths, even though they sound totally different!
    Also, Ian, you're a freakin' MONSTER of a player! Awesome video!

  • @kitsapbass9348
    @kitsapbass9348 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love how when you’re playing the older one, the video is a bit grainy like it’s a VHS camcorder. Nice job Brother!!!!!

  • @simongrant1015
    @simongrant1015 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I bet being played for more than 20 years had warmed the tone of the ‘99. Sounds perfect over gospel. Though I prefer the 2021 for prog because it still has those clear harmonics and resonant midrange.

  • @MrLPeoples
    @MrLPeoples ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For preference - I’m vintage JP all the way.. but the newer model will get/keep your gig- much more versatile.

  • @RossCampoli
    @RossCampoli ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Never felt any desire for a six string until this video!

  • @joemills4663
    @joemills4663 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Be awesome to combine the 99s ken Smith's mid-vowel response to accompany the newer 21s punchy, more focused & even sound. great video and content as usual Ian!

  • @rustyshackelford4503
    @rustyshackelford4503 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can’t pick a favorite. They both sound terrific. 1999 is a little burpier sounding. Bridge pickup maybe voiced hotter. The newer one sounds a hair deeper and smoother. Both are amazing.

  • @DarrellHaase
    @DarrellHaase ปีที่แล้ว +7

    LOVE the DT song. Would love to see John Myung on SBL.

  • @meyersguitars2196
    @meyersguitars2196 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am with you 100% on Scott’s tone. It sounded better but not by a mile. Seems more like it has a touch less mids. Yours pokes out a little more and Scott’s is open every so slightly less mids and more sparkle or snap. Great video and even better playing.

    • @meyersguitars2196
      @meyersguitars2196 ปีที่แล้ว

      I also think the reason your bass sounds more modern is the fact you’re bass has 18 volt system and I feel that is going to push everything just a little more. I think that is why Scott’s sounds more open as it is more passive so to speak. Less effect from the electronics.

    • @Watermelon_Man
      @Watermelon_Man ปีที่แล้ว

      This is just hilarious because one of the top comments on this video also says that the vintage one had MORE mids😂

  • @OscarCherici
    @OscarCherici ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To me the 99 sounds more warm and generally speaking the foundamental and first harmonic is more pronounced. That's a game changer to a bass to my taste as a player and as a listener. Great video, you're great please continue we need you

  • @jaapdesticker
    @jaapdesticker ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome basses. My 1990 BT5 is my main bass. Tuned it down a half step, so I can hit those delicious low Bb's when playing along Richard Smallwood songs...

  • @krimsworld
    @krimsworld ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I definitely prefer the newer one! Sounds more like it knows what it wants to sound like.

  • @PushSueAside
    @PushSueAside ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Personally, i think the the yours is much more attractive (the wood grain and color), and if you like the feel of yours… isn’t that the better one? In my experience with music instruments, the more you play one, the better it will sound. Congratulations on getting the “childhood dream” bass, and cutting board. Cheers

  • @JackiesJohn
    @JackiesJohn ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Representing West and then East Coasts, recommend a 6th boutique builder, MIke Tobias, and comparing his Tobias 80’s custom 6-string with his current MTD 635-24.

  • @Gubgubgoober
    @Gubgubgoober ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was so happy to see Kirk Franklin being played I just saw his tiny desk concert and was blown away by the bass playing.

  • @kmrumedy
    @kmrumedy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wouldn't call a 1999 Ken Smith "vintage". Vintage would be more comparable to a late 80's BT with the black oversized headstock and the original 3 knob preamp. Those are considered the hey-day and most sought after by us Ken Smith aficionados. Great video. I very much enjoyed it.

  • @xxitz_pr0gxx631
    @xxitz_pr0gxx631 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    MY GOD! The Growl this bass has is one of the greatest things I have ever heard! Beautiful basses, guys!

  • @michaelhardie9193
    @michaelhardie9193 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love Ian's passion for bass. It is infectious

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  ปีที่แล้ว

      🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻

  • @slapinfunk
    @slapinfunk ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Long time Smith player here. The difference isn't so much the tone between the difference of them being modern and vintage... The difference is the core when it comes to tone. The tone difference is mostly from the mahogany core. The maple or walnut core Smiths don't sound the same vintage or not. If you can do this with two basses with the same core it will make a difference. Construction wise there a bunch of differences visually and feel wise but that is up to the player which they prefer. The best Smiths IMHO are ones with a Mahogany core.

  • @dannster
    @dannster ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Yours has more girth and growl. Neither is better and both sound great in their own way. Scott’s sounds like how you’d expect a KS to sound and yours has a more modern sound I think.

  • @GroovemanJ5
    @GroovemanJ5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the 99 a little better, but both are killer! Smith basses are amazing.

  • @its.me.jordo.
    @its.me.jordo. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic video, thanks for always leaving me something to enjoy during Saturday morning breakfast!

  • @allbassful
    @allbassful ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great comparison! I’ve tried one Ken Smith bass, it was a 4 string and had the most amazing tone. Bucket list bass for sure.

  • @lockharthorsburgh8601
    @lockharthorsburgh8601 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very slight preference for the tone for the 2021, but they both sound great. Of course, Scott's has more tonal options with the extra switches, and it may be that the newer one will "evolve" with use, so maybe this could be re-visited in a year or so? The playability is a key point, and I'm glad you mentioned that at the end; it means the good tones are more accessible . . .

  • @stephenbobic3226
    @stephenbobic3226 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I agree, I like the tone of Scott's BT6 a bit better. It just sounds a bit fuller than the new one.

  • @enricoviappiani4305
    @enricoviappiani4305 ปีที่แล้ว

    Got a 6 string 2006 Ken Smith and a 1986 4 string ken Smith. The old one is the best sounding bass I ever played. Period. Every time someone tries it, he made me an offer. Hadrian Feraud also.

  • @BYLRPhil
    @BYLRPhil ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These types of boutique basses never appealed to me, but I’m glad you like them!

    • @IanMartinAllison
      @IanMartinAllison ปีที่แล้ว

      They’re just another color on the palate!

  • @danielirvine7468
    @danielirvine7468 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great vid man loved how you did a few styles of music not just slap .

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻

  • @KharmaBodiesGuitars
    @KharmaBodiesGuitars ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I liked Scott’s bass better too. The newer bass sounded a bit muddled. I thought the slap sound was more similar than the other two examples. Both beautiful basses.
    I was making guitar parts in NYC area and supplied parts to many of the luthiers learning their craft from 1975-1981. Some of those East Coast builders were great because they truly loved what they did.

  • @guitarslang
    @guitarslang ปีที่แล้ว

    1999 - drier in sound. Therefore, I think for those who play it, they will feel better feedback from the instrument. And this is one of the main feelings for a musician. 2021 - more oily and fatty zyuk. Also of high quality. Sounds smooth across the entire fretboard. Any of these basses would be my dream.

  • @Bassdriver
    @Bassdriver ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The tonal difference is nearly negligable. The '21 seems to have the tiniest little bit more of top end ("zing" or however you call it) and personally, I think I like the '99 a little bit more, but overall, they have pretty much the same "core tone component". Fantastic basses! However, the Boutique Bass Revolution didn't start in the late 70s on the East Cost. It actually began almost 10 years earlier in California, when Ron and Susan Wickersham started a small family company named Alembic. And I'm extremely fortunate to own one of their creations - a 2000 Essence 5. And I absolutely, totally LOVE it. It's my forever bass, full stop.

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Awesome man! We should definitely try get our hands on some Alembics and put a video together! 🔥🔥🔥

  • @AlxJrz401
    @AlxJrz401 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the upload, I own a 99 as well. From the hand rubbed dutch varnish (matte), book matched headstock and matching back body wings.the attention to detail these basses is in a class of its own. These basses simply cannot be judged simply by sound, but by the wholesome of playing while you hear the delivery of dynamic pressure of the strings. I customed ordered my KS and crazy as it may seem I had huge influence from same John Patatucci's instructional video. I even asked for the Silver Coin S on the headstock that JP had. Ken told me it was no longer offered... and years ago I saw that bass sell on Reverb... heartbroken... well you know my answer on which one I chose. lol

  • @mikeburford3005
    @mikeburford3005 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the sweeter tone of the older bass. I have never had the opportunity to play a Smith...good to know they weigh a ton. Good video!

  • @cd0u50c9
    @cd0u50c9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In my experience basses that were made in the 80s and 90s run circles around newer ones. I only ever bought one bass from new, and it kept giving me headaches and problems, whereas the older ones were built like tanks despite having been on the road for far longer. BTW I'm talking the same brand. Different build quality, different build ethos, then it was built to last.
    I personally prefer that 4-string Spector in the background better, thanks!

  • @Bassic778
    @Bassic778 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't know that Brubaker was making Ken Smith basses!!!!!! I was blessed to own a Smith Black Tiger 5 sting and I still regret selling it! To this day, it was the best bass that I have ever owned. The craftsmanship, playability, and TONE are on another level! I could close my eyes, pick one and be thrilled with my choice. The bass with food all over it and a KNIFE is straight-up BASS ABUSE!!!

  • @adamodimattia
    @adamodimattia ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At times the difference is subtle but with no hesitation I would choose the "vintage" one. I made my decision before knowing what Ian has chosen, but after hearing his thoughts I agree that there is something more open in the tone of the vintage one, especially in the lower registries there is more "roundness" to the sound.

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻

  • @lummond
    @lummond ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Both basses are undeniably Ken Smith, but I hear Scott's as a little rounder - warmer in the mids, perhaps a little muted on the top end, and Ian's is a little clearer with slightly hollower mids. But hey, changing strings can do that!

  • @BLACKSYNTH
    @BLACKSYNTH ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Same with all bass/guitars even speakers. They are all very tight and stiff sounding when new, That goes away and it usually opens up when used daily/weekly as much as it is ever going to within 6-12 months. So it's not much to worry about that 21 will sound like the 99 after a while.

  • @gimmeagig
    @gimmeagig ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a cheap Chinese Brice 6 string which has a great neck, low action, plays like a dream. I changed absolutely everything on it including pickup location. I got it to sound almost like a 70s Fender Jazz. I love this thing and for the money I saved compared to a Ken Smith I could buy myself a used Miata convertible LOL

  • @ultimatebasses
    @ultimatebasses 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Both sound awesome, and I'd be happy with either. My favorite Smith tone comes from Melvin Davis while playing his MD7 with Lee Ritenour. Best 6 I've played would be a tie: Fodera Imperial and an MTD 635, both with Walnut bodies. F Bass has made numerous 6 string basses for Alain Caron that sound fabulous. If my poor arthritic hands would allow me to play a 6, I'd be happy with any of the four builders mentioned above. A 5 tuned E - C is a perfect solution to getting those amazing upper register chords. Just like Janek or Damian Coccio.

  • @fretworks9692
    @fretworks9692 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Both phenomenal sounding basses. The best bass I ever played was a Ken Smith 6. I was in Avenue Guitars in Edmonton years ago and they had a BT6 there. I sat down with it and played the prelude to the Bach cello suite in G and ended up with an audience because the tone was just so incredible, like a fine classical guitar. I couldn't get over it. The sound still haunts my bass dreams. I think with time the '21 will sound even better than the '99 as the wood ages: its slap sound is already nicer IMO but the fingerstyle sounds better on the '99. I've got a '93 Ibanez Soundgear (pictured in my avatar) that sounds incredible after all these years of playing it, and it's just a production bass. Imagine what that many years will do for the '21.

  • @ileutur6863
    @ileutur6863 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I see literally no reason to favor a vintage instrument over a new one. The only advantages I can think of is having a worn in feeling and a neck that has settled into shape, but that's something a well built bass should already have

  • @JohnAldenDavis
    @JohnAldenDavis ปีที่แล้ว +1

    SHEESH, after hearing that angelic playing, I’m gonna have to write up a game plan on obtaining a 6 string. Thanks Ian, I’m jonesing HARD now. Lol

  • @billytai1096
    @billytai1096 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic comparison Ian. Your playing is incredible and you are so insightful and inspirational.

  • @grandvianna8551
    @grandvianna8551 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude, Ive seen you in a bunch of SBL videos but havent really ever heard you play. DAYUM SON, you killin 👏👏👏

  • @ethiopianpoisonouscaterpillar
    @ethiopianpoisonouscaterpillar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always a good day when I wake up to a new SBL upload!

  • @kenichijono7117
    @kenichijono7117 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My overall preference is 1999. But I found it more suitable for 2021 when you played DT. Cheers!

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  ปีที่แล้ว

      🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻

  • @analogholic3651
    @analogholic3651 ปีที่แล้ว

    Came for the basses...went away with YOU! Man you are such a great player!!! Think I preferred the old one...a little more focused to my ears

  • @BlackRootsAcademyOfSoul
    @BlackRootsAcademyOfSoul ปีที่แล้ว

    The 1996 sounds INCREDIBLE, but the 2021 looks so good. 👌🏿
    Greetings from Uganda 🇺🇬👊🏿🖤

  • @driverbass1554
    @driverbass1554 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ken Smith Steel Rounds are my favorite strings. I got turned on to them back in college. I took an "Applied Music" course (private lessons for college credit). My teacher had a Smith that was probably 20 years older than Scott's. He sure could make that bass sing. He played a beautiful solo version of In My Life by the Beatles. I always asked my teachers what strings they use. At that time I was loving Blue Steels by Dean Markley, once they got broken in. Fresh Blue Steels had very "gritty" feel at the beginning, but once "broken in" would smooth out and would last forever. Ken Smith Steel Rounds are smooth and "broken in" right out of the pack and last forever. I'd change my strings once a year just to be safe, but could probably last longer.

  • @nickfoster9350
    @nickfoster9350 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a 2001 BSR5J that I ordered in late 2000, and it was delivered to me in February 2001. It remains one of my most prized possessions, along with my 2009 BRS6EG.

  • @eljanjabrailoff5998
    @eljanjabrailoff5998 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i find your Ken Smith much better and deeper than other instrument
    thank u

  • @MrWilhinds
    @MrWilhinds ปีที่แล้ว

    I own one from the late nineties. She amazing, super tone and very easy to play!!

  • @outsider462
    @outsider462 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would guess the 99 would be easier to play. In my 26 years of playing bass and buying/selling I’ve always found the older instruments to be less stiff and more “settled in” when playing and with tone. My 99 bsr5gn is unreal. I think both basses sound like a smith and are incredible. But, they aren’t making ‘99s anymore lol. Great vid.

  • @MrLPeoples
    @MrLPeoples ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s amazing many of us have had the same story… I grew up the same way… saw the same JP Vid on VHS… and have NEVER played a Ken… playing since 95. I want the first time I play one to be special…

  • @amesfamily9464
    @amesfamily9464 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love both but Scott’s bass tone is the winner for me.

  • @doublebass5y
    @doublebass5y ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Video Guys. I think that Alembic were probably this first Bespoke builders of bass guitars, ie series 1 stanley clarke and also Carl thompson piccolo bass. Early 70,s.
    Some thing to do with Jerry Garcia of Greatful Dead and one of the pa tech guys.

  • @n_phaneuf
    @n_phaneuf ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I liked the B string on the 99 for sure.
    The 21 might be clearer in the top but I’m not sure I prefer that

  • @aarons9259
    @aarons9259 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Holy cow!!! They both sound ridiculously good👌👌

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They (Smith) have been extremely consistent over the years!

  • @zechariahfrink3707
    @zechariahfrink3707 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You forgot about the legendary Michael Pedulla and Alembic! He started in 1975 and I’m not sure when Alembic started but it was around the same time I’m pretty sure.

  • @Hispanicwoman
    @Hispanicwoman ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Cool video, sir. I've been wondering for a long time whether to invest into a newer style bass, or an older one. Think I'm more worried about the weight of an older one though, because I've got some issues with the wrist, where lifting heavy objects are concerned.

    • @BearfootBob
      @BearfootBob ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is a guitar/bass strap from gruvgear called "DuoStrap Neo" that balances instrument weight on both shoulders, which could be a help to you. I am recovering from a serious nerve pinch in the neck, which causes significant pain all the way down the arm and including the wrist. So I highly recommend finding yourself a good physical chiropractor (not a nutrition supplement / muscle testing practitioner using the same kind of license) who may be able to quickly identify what's going on with your wrist.

    • @Hispanicwoman
      @Hispanicwoman ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BearfootBob I appreciate that advice, thank you. Hope you have a speedy recovery as well.

    • @johnhaydin9495
      @johnhaydin9495 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I bought the duo strap as well and totally love the way it puts the weight on both shoulders!!

  • @timball1536
    @timball1536 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both are beautiful. I prefer the 2021. It's a little more clearer in the high end.

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  ปีที่แล้ว

      🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻

  • @Hndsmstrngr1
    @Hndsmstrngr1 ปีที่แล้ว

    I went by Ken's shop in New York around 1981 on a return trip leaving Boston back to Memphis Tennessee where I lived. I was just about to start my double bass degree program. I got to play one of his original 100 builds. There's one in particular with being good top it was just beautiful instrument. After I'd gotten home sometime later he called me and said that the person that had commissioned That Base could not pay for it and had to Forfeit the deposit and ask me if I wanted it for $1,800. I said yes I would really love to have it but I'm just starting back to college to study double bass and I don't see it in my budget at this time but I appreciate you calling me. Looking back I should have gone to my parents and explained it I would still be playing an electric bass in jazz band and this guy was just trying to various of electric bass and it would be a wise investment in overtime to own one. But I was 21 and not very conniving. Now I realize that instrument would be worth about $7,000 but the money is irrelevant to me I could not believe how sensitive and intuitive and easy it was to play that bass. It had low action but didn't rattle or Buzz and you stroked it and you coaxed the sound out you didn't have to overpower it. I would love to still someday maybe on one. Life comes at you kind of weird and sometimes the timing is just way off.

  • @biskitbass
    @biskitbass ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice opening riff Ian!!!! Great video too Btw 😉

  • @kenmarshall3221
    @kenmarshall3221 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm really unsure with out playing the them but Scott gets the job

  • @stcezaire06
    @stcezaire06 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 2 are Awesome very difficult choice ; Same with my 2 WAL MK2 5 strings Fretless years 2000 and 2019 , one day I prefer the 2000 and other day I prefer the 2019 ......

  • @dorianreu
    @dorianreu ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a fan since I heard John Patitucci on that KS, I love the sound!

  • @czarpaul01
    @czarpaul01 ปีที่แล้ว

    Went in assuming I would like the 99 more, but I preferred the 2021. Sounded fuller to me

  • @shawnhuff3920
    @shawnhuff3920 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The new one has more clarity and vibrant sound quality 👌

  • @DennisSattler
    @DennisSattler 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The difference in those two could very well be the adjustments of the pickups.
    As the strings die out, you can raise the different alen screw poles to compensate for the loss in sound on each string.
    And thats two positions on each pickup.😊

  • @jsgovind
    @jsgovind ปีที่แล้ว

    I preferred the fingerstyle tone on the '99 and the slap tone on the '21. These are minor differences though. Both are amazing basses.

  • @OSQCHANNEL
    @OSQCHANNEL ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Even when I feel like a vintage man having my 40's this year... On the other hand just a little bit like starting playing bass... I love them both very much :) And these back sides are just perfect to me :D I'm a little freak as well ;)

  • @absoluteai41
    @absoluteai41 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a nice story and I can definitely relate. Glad you finally got it. Great video! Also, vintage almost wins.

  • @rome8180
    @rome8180 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd like to see this same video done with a vintage P bass and contemporary P bass (preferably one that has similar specs).

  • @PeteLamont
    @PeteLamont ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the modern bass in the mix but the vintage solo. Thanks for the video!

  • @adambidas9425
    @adambidas9425 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Scott’s has that rich low end and midrange growl. Whereas yours Ian I felt the high end was more pronounced. You had that thing singing in the upper register. Both amazing in their own right.

  • @Groovephonik
    @Groovephonik ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer the sound of your KS. The extra headroom of 18v seems to project a fuller eq tone across the board.

  • @bartlomiejciolkowski4716
    @bartlomiejciolkowski4716 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had listened to this record a couple days ago, brought back memories. Anyways nice chops, man and the harmonics sound good.

  • @bustabass9025
    @bustabass9025 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've got a 2019 BSR6. There's nothing like the sound of a Smith 6 string bass. It'll change your life!

    • @devinebass
      @devinebass  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🧡🧡🧡

  • @ruzgaravcii
    @ruzgaravcii ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Those ken smiths are so beautiful

    • @rufussthubbins8891
      @rufussthubbins8891 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Boutique bass for a boutique player!

    • @ruzgaravcii
      @ruzgaravcii ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rufussthubbins8891 my dad used to have one of those 99' ones back in days and they are so fun to play

  • @everready19373
    @everready19373 ปีที่แล้ว

    The bass I'm playing now came out of the trash back in the spring of 2021. New tuners, bridge and a neck shim and it plays pretty good. The action is about 3mm. Not bad.
    I'm tempted to get a better one but right now, my skill level doesn't warrant the expense.

  • @sinakaedwards2009
    @sinakaedwards2009 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the 2021 Bass or your bass better. The sandwich shows up better, the neck thru difference is brighter, and the sound of the 21 has more punch and growl to my ears.

  • @JasonFerguson17t
    @JasonFerguson17t ปีที่แล้ว

    Love this video, I wish more companies made quality 6 strings.

  • @mikebrueggman6666
    @mikebrueggman6666 ปีที่แล้ว

    Comparing the two basses, the vintage(Scott’s) sounds better for Gospel whereas the modern(Ian’s) sounds better for Prog. Especially when it comes to the harmonics fill on Lines in the Sand, a modern will be better fit for that job, but you need something with age to really fit in a gospel sound imo. The slap on the otherhand, there was no clear cut answer for what bass was better
    Also it hurt to say a modern bass is better for prog because I have the first Yamaha John Myung signature bass(also from late 90s), and it’s a beast

  • @JerryAyon-jo4ts
    @JerryAyon-jo4ts 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tough to call it. There both beautiful and sound Great, but being an owner of a 1995 BT custom G6. I'm going with the 99. I know I'm biased, sorry ...

  • @6lillium
    @6lillium ปีที่แล้ว +2

    AHEM.....East coast? Have we perhaps forgotten the contribution of the West coast in the early 70s ..... ALEMBIC , active electronics, as well as filter based controls? Big oversight.( I'm not even mentioning a host of other " firsts"created in their custom shop)

  • @markblackstad8705
    @markblackstad8705 ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer the 2021, a bit more low end and grit but the differences are subtle. Probably the 18v pre amp makes the biggest difference.