Understanding the Classic of Changes (I Ching)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 134

  • @aaronnelson6699
    @aaronnelson6699 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    It's really nice to have this information presented in a way that doesn't mystify it. I've been trying to better understand things like this and Chinese astrology, but I keep running into these new-age hippie superficial websites that really don't seem to have much genuine interest in the culture that they are appropriating. You put a lot of life into the body of old knowledge that too often gets treated as static. These concepts meant different things to different people, and they argued about them. That means that the philosophy was much more dynamic than I've often been led to believe.

    • @sidepriest
      @sidepriest 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Excellent post.

    • @kristinabliss
      @kristinabliss 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The I Ching is literally all about dynamism.

  • @anstoi-va5250
    @anstoi-va5250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Did you notice - lecturer is amazingly perceptive and even using science terms he expresses deep insights that can be called cosmic.

    • @ProfVanNorden
      @ProfVanNorden 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your kind words!

  • @danieljohnson1924
    @danieljohnson1924 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Fascinating lecture. Perfect for an enthusiastic non-expert like myself. Well presented and interesting. Thanks for uploading.

  • @ernestschmidt8761
    @ernestschmidt8761 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great work! Loved your balanced and thoughtful take on this 👏🏼

  • @bartie55
    @bartie55 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Without ever hearing or knowing about the 'I Ching' before, I suddenly came across it in 2 different situations in the same period. First while listening to Terence McKenna lectures. Secondly while reading Herman Hesse's "the Glass Bead Game' in which the 'I Ching' is quit prominently present. When the student is ready...
    Thanks for this great lecture!

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was a huge Herman Hesse fan when I was younger. Loved "The Glass Bead Game"!

    • @rmschindler144
      @rmschindler144 ปีที่แล้ว

      synchronicity! (...funny enough, the video was still playing as I was about to write this comment, and just as I was about to write the word, ‘synchronicity’, Dr. Norden said the word!)

    • @redefinedliving5974
      @redefinedliving5974 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow i have that book i bought around2011-2012 in a used books shop. Precognition bruh

    • @justoguillermomontoya3821
      @justoguillermomontoya3821 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I first heard about Iching through Philip K Dicks “man on a high castle”

  • @IAm-ur9cq
    @IAm-ur9cq 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I have found i-ching to be strangely accurate. It's answers concerning my questions invariably make good sense and provide clear counsel and direction.

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yes, many people have this experience.

    • @ginomazzei1076
      @ginomazzei1076 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Read Jungs commentary to the Baynes book. The ONLY I Ching in town

  • @plusone8015
    @plusone8015 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Dude... excellent integration of the subject matter, history, influences and the presentation harmonizes with the aforementioned.
    I especially enjoyed the contrast of Buddhism vs other schools.
    I wish you would do a video on the Kojiki/takeuchi documents and Kototama.

    • @spiralsun1
      @spiralsun1 ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s pronounced “eye” Ching. That’s an I not and E. It’s translated. Association with “I “ and “eye” makes it more an accurate meaningful translation. Stop trying to demonstrate how much you studied it and look at the bigger picture. 😂❤️👍🏻👁️ The TAO of it.

    • @Smarrie82
      @Smarrie82 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No. It isn't " I" pronounced . New age goobers say it this way. I have never heard any philosopher or teacher pronounce it as the " I " sound 🥴😂 you should look into more cultural and historical facts , not just those that know very little and are trying to twist it into their own thing for profit.

  • @vudshpreyk
    @vudshpreyk ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Mind blowing lecture! I came here because I saw a book about Yijing in His Dark Materials tv show and wanted to know what it was. This lecture gave me so much inspiration and ideas for work. Thank you!

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm glad you enjoyed it! I hope you will check out some of my other lectures.

    • @vudshpreyk
      @vudshpreyk ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BryanVanNordenPhilosophy I'm looking forward to them! Thank you so much for sharing all this information with the world!

    • @astrology4divination
      @astrology4divination ปีที่แล้ว

      same! his dark materials is wonderful because it has introduced the i ching to a wider audience

    • @bymariahenning
      @bymariahenning ปีที่แล้ว

      Love that! I read His Dark Materials a few years ago before discovering my current area of study, Human Design and the Gene Keys, which incorporate the I'Ching. Later, when I re-read HDM, seeing that the I'Ching was in there made me lose my mind! I'm glad the show is now getting both HDM and the I'Ching out to more people :)

  • @MsWindlee
    @MsWindlee ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mind blowing indeed.
    As an Asian descent having lived most of her life outside of China, thanks for helping me understand how I think the way I do.

  • @nataliamironova1507
    @nataliamironova1507 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I Ching looks like a visualization of the calculations in the Theory of Probability, a Theory not in the sense of Statistics, but in the sense of Open Complex Systems. Unparalleled!

  • @waitingforparts57
    @waitingforparts57 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Fantastic material! ! Just being able to understand the meaning behind the Harrison's song becomes an Awakening moment for me. Hearing it since it was released I was ignorant of it's meaning. Today, through the Synchronicity of listening to today's talk I felt my past reinterpretated. Understanding that song in a new way is an incredible feeling. Your talks have been a treasure for me. Thank you

  • @keevancrawford6708
    @keevancrawford6708 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Bro, this is so good it’s insulting.

    • @ProfVanNorden
      @ProfVanNorden 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your kind words!

  • @lukemurray7285
    @lukemurray7285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This lecture was highly informative, thank you so much Bryan.

  • @malcolmmacinnis247
    @malcolmmacinnis247 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    46:12 your analysis of the sentence talking about "The Way" and "The Way of the Gentleman" reminds me of the way Miyamoto Musashi writes his book of 5 rings with "the way" and "the gentleman warrior". Reckon there's a connection?

    • @charliecho5392
      @charliecho5392 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I heard gentleman, 君子,used to be used in its name for people who went to war, was a leader of it, who were effective and noble in their leadership. So this is around 1500BC to 500 BC. But later as scholarship became prevalent the meaning of 君子 became more about the educated man than a war minister. This change must have happened around just before Confucius 500BC to 300BC. This change must have happened for the definition of 'gentleman' 君子

  • @สมาน-ฆ6ภ
    @สมาน-ฆ6ภ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good evening, Bryan Teacher. How are you today? Today I still learn Chinese philosophy from your lectures, and this lecture is useful and exciting for me very much. I remembered that Master Tang Mingbang 唐明邦 told us in his book named "Comments and Annotations of Zhou Yi"《周易评注》that "The book of Changes《周易》(or 《易经》) not only is the book of heaven (天书) in the cultural history of the world, but also has many cultural values, so the book of Changes is the oriental wisdom." I absolutely agree with Master Tang Mingbang.
    Thank you Bryan teacher, I wish you have a nice weekend. From Thailand 🇹🇭

  • @skfanfanfan
    @skfanfanfan ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Lecture, Professor. Many thanks.

  • @jessegibson3548
    @jessegibson3548 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very informative and cogent. Thank you very much.

  • @acidpunk7423
    @acidpunk7423 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for helping me understand such rich history. I will be laboring to learn the language which compliments the master line work

    • @CaptainFluffy1000
      @CaptainFluffy1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have written a book, Classical Chinese for Everyone, which can get you started learning the language.

  • @jaydenrogers8709
    @jaydenrogers8709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is a great lecture. I came curious about the I-Ching after listening to Terrance McKenna

  • @YiTubeChannel
    @YiTubeChannel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You made me really happy with this video Bryan. Thank you so much for sharing 🤗

  • @MrDeadviser
    @MrDeadviser 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you for this lecture, I found it quite helpful even though I'm not new to the Changes. What an amazing book! It seems that it still holds enormous potential for further research, especially from the perspective of cognitive science and psychology.

  • @mafeizaguirre
    @mafeizaguirre 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for this fantastic lecture, professor. Very helpful to understand the system.

  • @gerardlabeouf6075
    @gerardlabeouf6075 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    really insightful and interresting thank you

  • @ernestkienzle6058
    @ernestkienzle6058 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Fascinating and informative. Wish Prof. Van Norden added a pdf of his lecture. It would be a great help to students.

  • @trl3180
    @trl3180 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent video !

  • @breakingthewall2112
    @breakingthewall2112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for this lecture! Really appreciate you posting and sharing this info.

  • @WendyWongAuthor
    @WendyWongAuthor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    An excellent lecture that connects the physics and metaphysics of the Tao may be early insight to the quantum.

  • @astrology4divination
    @astrology4divination ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great lecture thank you so much Prof Van Norden!

  • @Phractal
    @Phractal ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent lecture!

  • @mcpoulet13
    @mcpoulet13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is extremely enlightening, well researched and explained. Subscribed!

  • @recalling_life
    @recalling_life ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative, thank you

  • @lordcublington
    @lordcublington 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for this!

  • @moveslo
    @moveslo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, this was a Fantastic presentation. Subscribed!

  • @TommyAu-ro2pw
    @TommyAu-ro2pw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This gentleman is the best non-Chinese who can pronounce the name perfectly.

    • @ProfVanNorden
      @ProfVanNorden 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your kind words!

  • @ProjectMoff
    @ProjectMoff ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a fantastic lecture! Very synchronous for me, thank you! It's interesting how it is "commonly" thought of as only one thing existing but things are only things when lines are drawn around them whether in space or in concept. "The Ultimate" cannot be a thing as it is infinite and boundless and the infinite is the blank canvas of all potential that "contains" the finite, the finite does not contain the infinite, or perhaps it does I don't know, but that's where I'm at... Things are mental divisions only, the mind is a space, you could say all is truly mind, the foundation is mind, but then you've thingized" it, in the end whatever you say it is it is not, it's all a creation, even what I am saying now, I've noticed people think they talk out of a sense of importance but truly when our motives are examined we do what we do for the enjoyment of it, our words aren't truth they are poetry. Anyway, sorry, ranting nonsense at this point, thanks again Prof ✌

  • @kenwood9382
    @kenwood9382 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you 🙏

  • @spiralsun1
    @spiralsun1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent thanks! ❤

  • @sachalp.courtney2111
    @sachalp.courtney2111 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is this video a part of a greater course I could find somewhere

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, it is part of this series: th-cam.com/play/PLFZtry6b0WR7o6UF9_7jZwW_YtptlDm8P.html&si=IbaiZNv6o0Zvn_2_

  • @sydene54
    @sydene54 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    in horary astrology, astrologers say that when you ask a question, you don't know that you already know the answer. Otherwise you wouldn't ask.

  • @fusion9619
    @fusion9619 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was good. And you can actually pronounce Chinese, so I know your research and commentary come from a viewpoint of honest interest. That's my litmus test - it's like a proof of applied integrity.
    Edit - didn't like the Schrodinger's cat part. You could ask a physicist about that. But overall I really liked the presentation.

  • @luiginoto3352
    @luiginoto3352 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Leibnitz came up with the binary system independently right at the time the I Ching reached Europe?

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, he came up with it shortly before learning about the I Ching.

    • @luiginoto3352
      @luiginoto3352 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@BryanVanNordenPhilosophy An unlikely coincidence

  • @charliecheng3340
    @charliecheng3340 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The 108 Stick divination is very true

  • @rchin75
    @rchin75 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don’t know if synchronicity is real, but I do know that the I Ching works for me. Throwing coins twice for the same question is unlikely to give the same hexagram twice, but this does not matter because each of the 64 chapters provides a frame for thought. Regarding Schrödinger’s cat, I came to believe that there is a misunderstanding about observations on a quantum level. From what I understood it is not the observation itself that collapses the wave function, but the fact that the sensor is placed on the trajectory of the “wave”. It’s like measuring cars on the highway by letting them smash into your sensor, instead of observing them based on the light that reflects off the cars. Obviously that will collapse their wave function, i.e. speed. Maybe I am wrong though, because I am no quantum physicist.

  • @QuantumFengShui
    @QuantumFengShui 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My master taught me both palms shake 3 coins with questions it works all the time.

  • @InquilineKea
    @InquilineKea หลายเดือนก่อน

    are more broken lines representative of change?

  • @michaeltekleghiorghis7692
    @michaeltekleghiorghis7692 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do you know how to play go?

  • @theforcewithin369
    @theforcewithin369 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Your everyday mind is the buddha, if you try to accord you deviate" isn't part of the pattern if you transcend the world after all? Trying to get rid of attachment is attachment so you don't try or not

  • @teadubyatea
    @teadubyatea 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Eric Clapton played guitar on "While my guitar gently weeps"

  • @rmschindler144
    @rmschindler144 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wilhelm’s translation is mentioned as “one of the better” ones; I wonder, do you personally consider any particular translation as being superior to Wilhelm’s?

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Different translations will meet different needs. There is no single, best translation of any classic.

    • @rmschindler144
      @rmschindler144 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@BryanVanNordenPhilosophy ah, I agree and I see now that I should have specified something about my approach to the I Ching: my approach is from the occult angle; an ‘irrational’ and ‘divine’ impulse from within (which I practice listening to) has put the I Ching into the field of my attention. hmm, maybe that doesn’t say that much after all. ok, then I will say I’m not really interested in using it for divination-I’m interested in encountering terminology which can help me describe the truths which my heart reveals to me (ie truths about the nature of reality & the relations between all things and events).

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rmschindler144 Then I would use the Wilhelm translation, and carefully read Jung's Foreword.

  • @tzaphkielmelekiyah1518
    @tzaphkielmelekiyah1518 ปีที่แล้ว

    The pattern is the sequence by which the chi intonates its inner being-resonance

  • @ManMountainManX
    @ManMountainManX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    TY.
    /.

  • @env491john
    @env491john 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did they purposely make this video 108 minutes long?

  • @thetarotauthority
    @thetarotauthority 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The great ultimate looks like the kabbalistic tree

  • @marcususa
    @marcususa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Instead of being cremated, can I ask for my bones to be heated and cracked later to be read by some dude?

  • @SS-qk8oc
    @SS-qk8oc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The use of yarrow stalks makes it a plant-spirit communication-divination-magic….
    -Gordon White

  • @meeksde
    @meeksde 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who was neo Confucius. Was he in the matrix?

  • @tienshou
    @tienshou ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The hexagram in Leibniz binary numbers are upside down. You should also mention the 64 hexagrams represent 0 to 63 in binary numbers. The 64 hexagrams represent snapshots of the moment of the energy patterns in the universe. Just like the weather map you can predict the weather. The moment of the birth of a baby when he cries and sucks in his first breath. That frozen moment of the pattern of stars pattern also based on I Ching and Astrology. But all these are still in the realm of human realm , therefore the six realms . One is still in the cycle of life and death. One can find a way to totally come out of this cycle with the help a Tibetan master.

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! The notes to the TH-cam video include a correction to the format of Leibniz's binary system. :-)

    • @tienshou
      @tienshou ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dear Prof Van Norden, thanks for your feedback. Actually I know very little about I Ching, only consulting it once a while for the last forty years. So I am sorry to give any impression that I know a lot. But from my understanding, the yang and ying lines represent the waxing and the waning of the of the life forces, which are related to the mathematics number of 1 and 0. They are also related to DNA, which I have no knowledge of. I am a retired highschool teacher and a Vajrayana Buddhist for many years. I am very lucky to have met many teachers in my life, most of them are Tibetan Lamas. I have very little accomplishment and a great fortune to meet my wonderful teachers. I'm happy to write to you and wish you the best!

  • @fredwu6000
    @fredwu6000 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think it is an algorithm. Now that we have AI and Quantum computing, perhaps we may have the means to solve the mystery and the meaning of the 64 Hexagrams.

  • @1invag
    @1invag ปีที่แล้ว

    Huh just realised these trigrams are essentially triangles, trigonometry. I was watching a video earlier on babalonian mathematics, they were doing the same thing? Although babylonians didn't think of them as triangles apparently, the thought of them as rectangles divided diagonally. All in golden ratio due to their base 60 number system. Maybe that's where people make the mistake interpreting sacred geometry using out modern fractional system, maybe applying the old approach to "mathematics" will yield "better" results. Interestingly its not just science where we can draw these parallels, we can play this game with anything. It's works with economics too. And I think we can play this game because we're looking at the exact same system across the board just from differing perspectives. Lol we've had one idea, one insight and then just spun it out in an endless variety of forms without realising it bahaha 😅

  • @ginomazzei1076
    @ginomazzei1076 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Harrison was very influenced by lThe Autobiography of a Yogi” by Paramahansa Yogananda

  • @jehnonjohnson8391
    @jehnonjohnson8391 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The entire purpose of the I Ching has been revealed through Ra Uru Hu and Human Design

  • @jocr1971
    @jocr1971 ปีที่แล้ว

    a much more fitting song would have been 'chapter 24' from 'piper at the gates of dawn' by pink floyd.

  • @artstrology
    @artstrology 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My primary comment is: The I-Ching should not be considered philosophical in nature, but rather the meat, fruit, and bread of the pursuit of philosophy.
    My secondary comment is : The hexagrams 1-20 match precisely in order and content with other systems of the 20 days. Thus they are the meat and content of the day, for instance today is #4 Mang. These match (order and descriptors) the 20 days of the Maya Cholqi' calendar. These also match precisely with the images of the 20 major arcana of the tarot drawn by Coleman-Smith. These also match the 10 additional views of Mt Fuji, which were done in pairs of the twenty, thus numbering ten.
    The 21 - 56 hexagrams are the 36 decans of the solar year, and these match precisely with many systems, including 36 views of Mt Fuji, 36 decans of the Dendera Zodiac, the 36 decans on Altar V Tikal, the 36 decan images of the Hindu in Das Indische Horoskop by Marlene Kruger, 36 chapters of Numbers, and the first 36 chapters of genesis. These also match the lesser arcana of the tarot, though she did not have the level of understanding necessary to polish the images and also was hamstrung by the necessity of using the swords and whatnot, so it is mentioned but not used at high levels. It is to me considered a notable attempt.
    Jung and Freud were both born on the 3rd day , #3 hexagram Kun in the Legge trans, and # 3 Aj in the Quiche Maya, both of which mention a certain plant struggling to grow. The differences between Jung and Freud are easily discerned by examining their decans of birth, which clearly shows Freud having a bias toward sexuality and difficulty with parents, and Jung leaning toward wondrous wholistic human discovery rather than focus on ones own sexual perturbations.
    It is a well supported theory that the 20 days are the same order and function of the 20 amino acids, and the 36 decans are the first 36 primordial elements of the periodic table. These are the manifestations of the same energies.
    Index for correlations at artstrology dot com articles - artstrological Index

  • @andy42x
    @andy42x ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Great Ultimate is God. Ineffable, the Source which everything originates from. That's my interpretation anyway. 🙏

  • @InquilineKea
    @InquilineKea ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Unbroken lines as 1 wow

  • @divinicus
    @divinicus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    it is a martial art

  • @perrycomeau2627
    @perrycomeau2627 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm with Texas over the whole situation.

  • @iroulis
    @iroulis ปีที่แล้ว +2

    64 Hexagrams. Hmmm.
    You mean like the 64 CODONS of DNA?

    • @jessicahou8340
      @jessicahou8340 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The DNA 🧬 has the same pattern as the lines ;

  • @midnightchannel111
    @midnightchannel111 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    (Its pronounced "Yee Szhing")

  • @EquipteHarry
    @EquipteHarry 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gonzalez Frank Lopez Paul Gonzalez Matthew

  • @keevancrawford6708
    @keevancrawford6708 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hermetics folks

  • @crouchingtiger6319
    @crouchingtiger6319 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok

  • @Yanqingzhang
    @Yanqingzhang 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    qian gua: man - th-cam.com/video/eIBpMsNSJz0/w-d-xo.html

  • @两岸一家亲-n1h
    @两岸一家亲-n1h ปีที่แล้ว +1

    这是易经,中华文化的根

  • @ssaajjaadd5082
    @ssaajjaadd5082 ปีที่แล้ว

    خرب رب الترجمة والي ما يعرف انكليزي

  • @dwl3006
    @dwl3006 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't agree with Slingerland's translation. Translators should translate what's written, not impose their own interpretation, which they can add by using a convenient footnote.

    • @CaptainFluffy1000
      @CaptainFluffy1000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Slingerland's translation follows an alternative CHINESE version of the original text.

    • @dwl3006
      @dwl3006 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CaptainFluffy1000 I see.

  • @rickschrager
    @rickschrager 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The prof was doing well until he said that the Buddhist philosophy is "all is one." While this is true of other Hindu traditions it is not a part of Buddhist thought.

    • @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy
      @BryanVanNordenPhilosophy  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It depends on which Buddhists. "One is all and all is one" is a motto of the East Asian Huayan School of Buddhism.

    • @TzerMaan
      @TzerMaan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I.. a universe of atoms, and an atom of universe. All is one, one is all.

  • @blazinspace
    @blazinspace 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this!