Pro Photographer Reviews Your Images
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- In todays video I review your best work from the perspective of a professional commercial photographer.
I hope you find the reviews of use!
You can find me on;
Patreon / tinhouse
Instagram / scottchoucino
Facebook Group / 1893064874281393
Tin House Website and WORKSHOPS www.tinhouse-s...
My Commercial Workscottchoucino....
![[FULL EP.73] เปิดบ้าน 70 ล้าน "แป้ง Zbing" ยกมาทั้งญี่ปุ่น l เคหสถานบานปลาย l One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YBnJhTt07Pg/mqdefault.jpg)
Im doing my weekly Q&A on instagram today instagram.com/scottchoucino/
This honestly felt like being in a group crit at my old university. Absolutely invaluable feedback and inspiring me to look out for these details myself.
"spliff holder, pokey stick" haha, a man in the know and using the appropriate jargon. Excellent.
The Picanto driving creative thinking a combustion engine's piston is either a weed grindr or a part of a coffee machine was just *chefs kiss*, thank you for that moment Scott!
Thanks for reviewing my image! It was number 3, the pasta arranged into a suit.
I definitely thought I sent an unwatermarked one so I guess I hit the wrong export settings. Whoops.
First off, agree about all the technical suggestions and the next time I attempt it I'll put more work into the lighting. This isn't an excuse, just an explanation, but I only used two of those little LED RGB panels to work with, so that was all the power they've got and putting them farther away would have cost me a lot of light (if you look at the metadata you can see I was already at 1/6 of a second). That said, next time I'll put more work into the lighting. I've been wanting to retry this shot with a tweak to the concept anyway.
More than welcome
if you're low budget neewer lights can more than tide you over till you can afford more expensive ones. tbh you may not even see the point in "upgrading" once you get used to them. my only advice is be sure to get at least 300W strobes. anything less than that you will need to replace the moment you add light modifiers other than the standard reflectors
Cool photo!
29 was an engine crankshaft detail . 32 is a piston.
Thanks!
Beat me to it 😊
I liked the weed grinder better 😂
Correct
7:42 is me!! I shot it on a nikon d3500 and you’re absolutely right about the filenaming, it’s something I’ve been meaning to put a system together for for a long time so hopefully this’ll give me a push, but thank you so much for your critique, I really appreciate it 🖤
So excited to see my onion picture end up in the vid.
Also relieved there wasn't anything I didn't already know was wrong with it
Thank you so much for reviewing my photos. I shot the engine parts 29 and 32. Funny seeing all the comments about them. I got some inspiration for the piston one from your work, so thank you for the advice of it being flat, I will try to make it more dynamic by having the blue box at an angle to cast some shadows. Also the file naming…
Would just to like to say thanks. I've just found your channel and I'm learning loads. Your honest, blunt and educational reviews of photos are very interesting and different from a lot of the other channels. I'm not ready to send anything to you yet but I'm going to. Thanks Steve
Welcome aboard!
@24:58 Thanks for the feedback on my pocket knife image, it is in-fact from America. There are some UK legal pocket knives out there. I’m going to work on my focus stacking skills for sure. Thanks again! -Logan
@18:16 I completely agree, you are right its too messy. I just got those geometric shapes and forgot about the most important thing, the product. Thank you! And f22 cos i wanted it in one shot without focus stacking to save time but i ended up patching two images anyway. I'm glad you liked the green color at least :) will do better next time. Its weird that in this job, you have to focus so much on one image, make it perfect if possible and then shortly after forget about it and move on to the next project.
When you said you have no idea about cars you were not joking hahaha.
Love a brutally honest critique. Definitely see my own images in some of these and also spotted a few things you went on to mention, which helps me understand where my progression is on the grand scale of things.
Please do more.
25:37 It’s an piston for an internal combustion engine, a 4 stroke piston. Hard to tell what engine but, my guess would be some sort of small engine piston. 🤙🏻
Wow, your eye for detail, love it.
One of your main quibbles was on filenames. By so much critique I was wondering what your filing system looks like.
According to my thinking, a file name is completely inadequate anyway. You need tags, stars categories and all sorts of things stuffed into the metadata. But then filing a photo consumes much more time than the time used for taking it. Including any editing.
@8:58 Thank you for making this type of video! They inspire and motivate us to move forward! I'll deffo double-check more about the flash!
Awesome, thanks for being honest and pointing out details. This is something we as beginners need to watch and learn. To many bad Or mediocre images floating about being called good.
Haha of course you found the bit of fuzz on the ice cream 🤣. And yeah, there’s a bit if green color cast on the cone from the surface. Thought I dealt with it, but seems I could have been a bit more aggressive in post
loved this vid so much, helped me figure out how meticulous and professional you are looking at the fine and important details like clean cups, no smudges, etc, along with bits of advice on lighting. loved it. chuckled when you confused engine parts with weed slicers and coffee distribution tools though haha.
Your so blunt, I love it...
3rd from the end is a piston for an engine
Yes I agree Engine Piston at 26:00
Fascinating hearing your take. I think concepts are the most difficult thing for me at the moment.
Glad its been on use
Great vid love these
26:00 Engine piston
and the engine part with the blue background is the piston head
Thank you, much appreciate the video.
Hey Scott. Will there be another editions of photo reviews from you?
The one after the beer and skull image is a piston. The earlier “thing” is a camshaft…from an engine..
StAub is French iron cast pan. Comments alright for the other engine parts
Question: What would you suggest are good ways to keep up with current trends? For years I subscribed to the British Journal of Photography, but stopped as they changed the format and it just seemed like a recycled repetition of the same contrived "edgy" surrealism month after month...
@Tin Houde Studio - Part At 26 min is a piston for a combustion engine.
Overall, a good review of the submissions. Your observations were of value to me, although I’m probably not as competent as these examples.
Looks like we need a follow up video on file management and file naming.
I will try and put sometjhing together
DSC is sony
Do you have a video on suggested file naming as I have the mothers own job finding files I took in the past. Haven't yet stumbled on a good system to be able to lay my hands on exact images quickly yet. Need help before it bites me on the ass down the road.
Could you maybe film a video about image/file name Management? I’m a portrait photography and sometimes I export a websize image for proofs before sending the real images to the client. How would you name these files?
PROOFS
Thanks a lot for the video. Any chance of you doing it again? I'd love to submit some of my food shots for you to review.
This was photo roasting 😅
I would like to have some of my stuff reviewed but I do not commercial work ... know of any otherresources?
The engine part is the crankshaft. The pistons clamp to it.
What is the "Naughties?" You say it quite frequently but I don't think anyone knows what it means.
I ask this on behalf of your fans lol
oh I assumed it was a worldwide thing haha. In the UK its what we call from between the year 2000 to 2010
@@TinHouseStudioUK I like that there is term for that time because the Gen-Z call it "The 2000's" and I'm like... We are still in the 2000's!!😵💫.
I used to refer to the time as early millennial times. Lol
19.13 looks like CGI.
Crap. I wish I could have given one of my images
Absolutely useless. If you have any photo sense, what he adds is pure dribble.
Hey, Ansel, tell us your website, we want to see.
@@seth1066 is that your logic?! Deal w the issue. Apparently you comfort level is quite low.
@@pedrodeweever2850 The logic is you are hyper critical of a published and successful photographer, so you must be better. Seen the Tin Studio's stuff; now let's see yours.