Riverside 920 from Decathlon? How is it possible that he didn't make it to this list? Meets all requirements + has an integrated USB charger and dynamo hub...
This year I opted for the Canyon Grail (single decker). It is so fast and light that it replaces my road bike and flies over gravel and forest paths. With the right bags it is also suitable for bikepacking.
I was surprised to not see any of the big brands like trek and giant. Why did you choose to not include the checkpoint and revolt? Was it the price and popularity?
Recently got the Merida Silex 7000 2 with a GRX 1x12 speed. I've been commuting on it (30min ride with large hills) and will be taking it on its first real long distance (125-140Km) next week.
I enjoy your videos. I will say in one category which is brakes. I have toured in many remote and a very long distance from services and I prefer cable disk brakes as you can repair in the field and is a simple system to maintain. I wish more bikepacking bikes came with this style or as an option.
Nice round-up video. I personally wouldn't call 17 gear inches very low gearing, but I guess my legs are noodly and my bags too heavy. :) I'm looking forward to your video on bike packing bikes for more rugged terrain. I'm looking to buy a Tout terrain outback xplore but definitely open to other suggestions.
In blind test you couldn't tell the difference between a Maxxis and a Panaracer. Nobody can... Anyone who says they can is full of shit. I've been riding for 45 years... 99% of riders in a blind test can't tell the difference between the frames and components they run.
Hello, thanks for the video :). One thing, I am always surprised to see the canyon grizl in the list of bikes for bikepacking. I had a canyon grail which is similar except for the tyre clearance, and if for sure it was an efficient bike, it was not comfortable bike. I now ride a chiru vagus with a higher stack on which I put a 70 mm stem so the reach ends up shorter than the canyon and honestly it's day and night in terms of comfort. I feel like the canyon is more a road bike with big tyres rather than a regular gravel
I had a grizl for one day, I totally agree it's a race bike, stack is too low for leasure gravel and bikepacking, also tire clearance is not that great with 50 mm tires there is no room for mud
@@Jean-jk4zv Yes - weird choice. Criteria #1 is an Upright Frame Design - the Grizl Size Medium has a Stack-to-Reach of 1.45 which I would consider to be a fairly aggressive riding position.
Some great bikes there and a really well thought out vid. Well worth checking out Ritchey frames though. Not complete bikes, but very well considered, versatile frames of high quality and reasonable price: the Outback for all around gravel (casual race - bike packing) and the Ascent (bike packing - expedition). My only criticism is a lack of sizes suitable for small riders; but as you say, this is a really common issue.
I'm a big Ritchey fan! They are undoubtedly a step-up in terms of tube selection and engineering on most steel frames, and build up into really nice bikes. I think they are especially great for lighter and more recreation riders, as they offer a bit less lateral stiffness than usual (lab tests suggest ~20% less than average).
CO-Motion Cycles. I own three and they some of the best. Hand built frames in the USA. To your specs, and your drivetrain preference. The Divide model is a winner for example.
Here in western Europe, it seems that gravel bikes are like SUV. They are mainly used on asphalt roads. Every time I see bikepackers on gravel bikes, their bikes are so clean that I doubt they often ride dirt roads.
If you want something cheaper and more capable offroad get a used hardtail and then put a rigid fork, if you want to use a dropbar get a hardtail with a short top tube. I have 3 bikes right now, a hardtail, a rigid mtb, and a gravel bike. The rigid mtb is the best for gravel but if i have one bike to do it all i take my specialized diverge e5.
I think in the not too distant future, to make this list with a conventional derailleur drivetrain or rear hub, a T-47 bottom bracket should be a necessary feature. I would consider a Fairlight Faran if it was T-47, but as it is now I don't see the value add for the prices they charge. It's clearly the future of conventional BBs, no point dropping thousands on a "rugged" bike without it IMO.
I am always surprised that in such lists, Surlys are missing. But that is understandable though...they have been left behind so to speak and are no longer truly unique.
@@sorenludwig3978 True, true. And Surlys were never cheap anyway, so to speak and even less now. Their midnight special costs upwards of 2,000 dollars for mechanical disc brakes. Crazy indeed.
The Grizl 8 1by would be my pick over the 7. Costs only a little bit more and you can just change the mech cage to make it compatible with a 10-51 cassette. Admittedly the 2x mech should be able to fit a bigger cassette but I'll admit I'm biased to 1x. To be honest though I feel like even the tire clearance of 700c X 50mm is outdated and not optimal. Given that wider xc tires are generally proven to be faster, more comfortable and less likely to puncture than gravel tires there's just no excuse not to be trending towards fitting them. If I got any of these bikes I would probably try to shove in a 29 X 2.1 mezcal right away but mud clearance would of course suffer. Bikes like the Lauf Seigla or Curve Big Kev are showing what tire clearances can be while still being able to fit a gravel crankset. Hopefully that kind of design thinking shows up in more affordable bikes. I know I'll probably get hit with "just get a mtb bro" but I do think gravel bikes have their place and if xc mtb tires truly are optimal for "gravel" then gravel bikes should be able to fit them. I'm annoyed that wider tires are still largely seen as just for adventure and not speed/racing. Even the recently released new version of the Canyon Grail can only fit 42mm tires, what a joke. Watch Dylan Johnson if you need convincing that mtb tires are the best choice for speed on gravel terrain. Most of the current gravel bikes should be put in the category of allroad bikes and the next generation of gravel bikes(both adventure and racing ones) should be made to comfortably fit 29 x 2.25 tires IMO.
We see a lot of them here in France (cause it's a local brand). The customer support looks good too, in case of problem with the frame or else. I went with a Canyon for budget issues and because I liked the grizl AL, but Origine was on top of my list for online brands for aluminium and carbon frames.
Curious to know why did you choose the Faran over the Secan? On a list of gravel bikes when the Secan is Fairlight´s former gravel bike, if I’m mistaken it’s the second time you chose the Faran, by the way I love my Secan 😎 and I’m tempted to order a Faran with wide 27.5 tires.
The thin design of GT Grade's top tube and seat stays would make me less confident in vibration-prone/rocky areas. I am sure it is tested, but I wonder how it holds up long term compared to aluminium or steel touring/bikepacking bikes. I get that they are meant for different purposes, but I would prefer a slightly more robust looking design.
The Gemini looks great, finally gearhub/gearbox bikes with dropbars. Too bad it costs double what my current bike budget is. And only seems to come in one boring colour.
Just bought that priority gravel bike, sadly its only in black but on the positive side virtually zero maintenance and less fragility for the win. Their mountainbikes are too heavy.
Thanks for the list But 1 question: Criteria #1 is the upright frame design. What measurements/geometry data is best used to determine what is an upright frame design? From what I understand, a stack to reach over 1.5 is a good indicator. But several bikes on this list have a stack to reach well below this. (Canyon Grizzl, Propain Terrel CF) I´ve ridden a Canyon Grizl and that is not an upright frame design at all - it is a pretty aggressive riding position.
In the case of long top tube + short stem bikes, I'm looking primarily at the stack for a given size, as the distance from the saddle to the stem is often quite consistent. The Grizl with a 20-30mm shorter stem is actually very close in size to the Salsa Journeyer, despite the Grizl having a ~1.4 STR compared to the Journeyer having a ~1.5 STR. Could it be that the Grizl you tested was a bit small, or was fitted with a stem that was too long? But also, keep in mind that I'm weighing up multiple criteria when picking these bikes, so sometimes a bike that's not super upright will rise to the top due to its other attributes!
I have trek checkpoint, and geometry is not all that comfortable for a long day of riding, I wish it was more upright, what would be the best gravel bike with a good upright position if money is no issue?
Before giving up with your Checkpoint, have a look into riser drop bars! The Redshift Top Shelf raises your position by 50 or 70mm (2 or 2.75") to give you an ultra-comfortable upright riding position and easy access to the drops.
I always hated the GT bikes "triple triangle" design for their frames. I never understood why their steel/aluminium bikes back in the day actually had the seat stays joined to the seat post, making them heavier and stiffer with no benefit other than having a "signature look" for marketing (I was just ugly to me). Though I like the design choices on this bike, I can't help thinking that the design working so well now (in carbon & seat tube disconnect) is more arse in trying to maintain their signature look then good design.
Faran wins because of the mounts and price/performance criteria. Geometry is a wash looking at stack vs height. Trail is what will separare the two frames from each other I imagine.
@@omare_biketonature A gravel bike is more than just big tires. Secan has steep HTA, short stays resulting in short wheelbase, and a relatively high BB. Its a road bike with big tires (that's not a bad thing, there's a reason the midnight special is popular). There's a reason Fairlight's own marketing call it a Strael with big tires. Because it is. Its a road bike with big tires.
@@cjohnson3836 Eh, I think there's a lot of pedantry in cycling sometimes. Some people call gravel bikes a road bike with big tires, others call it a cyclocross bike, hybrid, 90s mountain bike... 🤷♂ I actually thought the video was just about gravel bikes and didn't notice the title included "Bikepacking" which makes the Faran the obvious choice over the Secan due to mounting points and beefier frame.
If you want the best value gravel bike and you're in continental Europe, you won't find any better then the Riverside GCR from Decathlon. Carbon frame and SRAM Rival AXS for 3000€. 🤯 And there's a step up for 3800€ which has carbon wheels and Sram Force AXS!
Great video! I'd like to just comment on the first criterion of comfort. As far as I know, a more aggressive, sportive position doesn't invariably equal lower comfort. This is a highly individual parameter, dependent on our level of flexibility and core strength. Proper bike fitting also plays a role. On a bike of a size chosen right to our body proportions and set correctly, one can feel equally or even more comfortable than on the frame forcing a more upright position. Said all this, more upward geometry makes probably for a safer choice for most of us.
The VIral Wanderer is the only one that comes to mind. Unless that's the perfect bike for you, it'll be best to upgrade the fork of a rigid Pinion bike yourself.
The bikes look good but are no where near the best, be interesting to see the criteria and to be honest tyres and wheels play a huge part in comfort, control, and speed.
influencers can. maybe they can influence you enough to spend a little bit more on bikes. Because everybody knows a bike that costs less than 1000 $ is shit. =).
I have a list of excellent gravel bikes under $1000 on my website! Still too expensive? Try finding one of these models second hand: www.cyclingabout.com/best-budget-gravel-bikes-with-drop-bars-under-1000/
never been more rich white folks than today. add to this, GPS w/ IPHONE cockpits, watt meters, and the bike packing myth where folks purchase a lot of styles of bags, straps, mounts, and then decide to get panniers.
@@gregknipe8772Non white here 😅 I have everything you’re mentioning except for watts meter and you’re right about the bikepacking bags, I also have bikepacking panniers and right now I have my eyes on the Mountain Laurel ultra light panniers, I spend my money on bikes, bags, outdoor gear and bikepacking trips.
I appreciate you mentioning stuff like the Journeyer, Grizzl, and Fairlight Faran, but man having a full carbon and also a $5000 ultralight bike set as "bikepacking bikes" just feels ridiculous coming from a guy that CLEARLY knows what he's talking about when it comes to durable bikes meant for traveling on.
I don't think you pay much attention to what is said on this channel. The whole idea is to have touring and bikepacking in mind, the geometry and swapping components to make rides comfortable. Anyone with back problem can also have terrible experience on full suspension with bad setup.
@@SonnyDarvishzadeh Well, kid, the key is to understand what "In my experience" means. After that, you may be able to start a debate. Just in order to make it not too long. I'd say that you don't have to worry, I've been riding every sort of bike since 82', any sort of frame material, over any terrain, and I've done it in several countries. And of course, I got my back injured. Just to let you know that I know what I'm talking about. Cheers.
meh, this is a bow to the current hype, and there are still road riders who have not purchased their "gravel bike". I prefer touring presentations, but I get it. there is untapped market with folks with money to burn. may as well jump in. next will be E-gravel bikes, then trikes. on and on.
This was a HARD video to make as there are just so many great bike options! What bikes should have made my list, and why? 🤔
Thanks for putting this together, I look forward to it each year.
Riverside 920 from Decathlon? How is it possible that he didn't make it to this list? Meets all requirements + has an integrated USB charger and dynamo hub...
This year I opted for the Canyon Grail (single decker). It is so fast and light that it replaces my road bike and flies over gravel and forest paths. With the right bags it is also suitable for bikepacking.
I was surprised to not see any of the big brands like trek and giant. Why did you choose to not include the checkpoint and revolt? Was it the price and popularity?
Bikes with gearboxes because maintenance is a waste of time
Here's a positive comment Alee: Thanks for the video!
Now the real question is Fairlight Secan or Faran… 😅
Recently got the Merida Silex 7000 2 with a GRX 1x12 speed. I've been commuting on it (30min ride with large hills) and will be taking it on its first real long distance (125-140Km) next week.
Great video. I always enjoy your well researched videos
Another excellent Cyclingabout video!
Thank you.
I enjoy your videos. I will say in one category which is brakes. I have toured in many remote and a very long distance from services and I prefer cable disk brakes as you can repair in the field and is a simple system to maintain. I wish more bikepacking bikes came with this style or as an option.
Thank you for doing the research. It is beneficial.
Thanks for another well thought out, accurate & informative video.
We all appreciate your hard work.
Great video - thanks for sharing
Great video! 🚲
Fantastic video as always
Nice round-up video. I personally wouldn't call 17 gear inches very low gearing, but I guess my legs are noodly and my bags too heavy. :)
I'm looking forward to your video on bike packing bikes for more rugged terrain. I'm looking to buy a Tout terrain outback xplore but definitely open to other suggestions.
Tire choice is more important than frame choice, you should review some tires, from big and small brands.
Hot take
Tires are hard to review
Bs
In blind test you couldn't tell the difference between a Maxxis and a Panaracer. Nobody can... Anyone who says they can is full of shit. I've been riding for 45 years... 99% of riders in a blind test can't tell the difference between the frames and components they run.
@@JustJake77 This seems obvious to me
Hello, thanks for the video :). One thing, I am always surprised to see the canyon grizl in the list of bikes for bikepacking. I had a canyon grail which is similar except for the tyre clearance, and if for sure it was an efficient bike, it was not comfortable bike.
I now ride a chiru vagus with a higher stack on which I put a 70 mm stem so the reach ends up shorter than the canyon and honestly it's day and night in terms of comfort. I feel like the canyon is more a road bike with big tyres rather than a regular gravel
I had a grizl for one day, I totally agree it's a race bike, stack is too low for leasure gravel and bikepacking, also tire clearance is not that great with 50 mm tires there is no room for mud
@@Jean-jk4zv Yes - weird choice. Criteria #1 is an Upright Frame Design - the Grizl Size Medium has a Stack-to-Reach of 1.45 which I would consider to be a fairly aggressive riding position.
Priority Gemini is definitely an interesting option. I wish they built a carbon frame version and added some mounting bolts to the fork though.
Some great bikes there and a really well thought out vid. Well worth checking out Ritchey frames though. Not complete bikes, but very well considered, versatile frames of high quality and reasonable price: the Outback for all around gravel (casual race - bike packing) and the Ascent (bike packing - expedition). My only criticism is a lack of sizes suitable for small riders; but as you say, this is a really common issue.
I'm a big Ritchey fan! They are undoubtedly a step-up in terms of tube selection and engineering on most steel frames, and build up into really nice bikes. I think they are especially great for lighter and more recreation riders, as they offer a bit less lateral stiffness than usual (lab tests suggest ~20% less than average).
CO-Motion Cycles. I own three and they some of the best. Hand built frames in the USA. To your specs, and your drivetrain preference. The Divide model is a winner for example.
Great video. There are at least 2 brands ive never heard of. Make that 3
Here in western Europe, it seems that gravel bikes are like SUV. They are mainly used on asphalt roads. Every time I see bikepackers on gravel bikes, their bikes are so clean that I doubt they often ride dirt roads.
Pięknie!
Zaciekawiły mnie koszyki na bidony - co to za modele?
If you want something cheaper and more capable offroad get a used hardtail and then put a rigid fork, if you want to use a dropbar get a hardtail with a short top tube. I have 3 bikes right now, a hardtail, a rigid mtb, and a gravel bike. The rigid mtb is the best for gravel but if i have one bike to do it all i take my specialized diverge e5.
I think in the not too distant future, to make this list with a conventional derailleur drivetrain or rear hub, a T-47 bottom bracket should be a necessary feature. I would consider a Fairlight Faran if it was T-47, but as it is now I don't see the value add for the prices they charge.
It's clearly the future of conventional BBs, no point dropping thousands on a "rugged" bike without it IMO.
Can you do a review on Dutch bicycles .
I am always surprised that in such lists, Surlys are missing. But that is understandable though...they have been left behind so to speak and are no longer truly unique.
Fairlight just builds much better frames, so the steel category is gone, the cheap ones arent that good, so this category is also gone.
@@sorenludwig3978 True, true. And Surlys were never cheap anyway, so to speak and even less now. Their midnight special costs upwards of 2,000 dollars for mechanical disc brakes. Crazy indeed.
The Grizl 8 1by would be my pick over the 7. Costs only a little bit more and you can just change the mech cage to make it compatible with a 10-51 cassette. Admittedly the 2x mech should be able to fit a bigger cassette but I'll admit I'm biased to 1x. To be honest though I feel like even the tire clearance of 700c X 50mm is outdated and not optimal. Given that wider xc tires are generally proven to be faster, more comfortable and less likely to puncture than gravel tires there's just no excuse not to be trending towards fitting them. If I got any of these bikes I would probably try to shove in a 29 X 2.1 mezcal right away but mud clearance would of course suffer. Bikes like the Lauf Seigla or Curve Big Kev are showing what tire clearances can be while still being able to fit a gravel crankset. Hopefully that kind of design thinking shows up in more affordable bikes. I know I'll probably get hit with "just get a mtb bro" but I do think gravel bikes have their place and if xc mtb tires truly are optimal for "gravel" then gravel bikes should be able to fit them. I'm annoyed that wider tires are still largely seen as just for adventure and not speed/racing. Even the recently released new version of the Canyon Grail can only fit 42mm tires, what a joke. Watch Dylan Johnson if you need convincing that mtb tires are the best choice for speed on gravel terrain. Most of the current gravel bikes should be put in the category of allroad bikes and the next generation of gravel bikes(both adventure and racing ones) should be made to comfortably fit 29 x 2.25 tires IMO.
My next gravel/winterroadbike is probably going to be an Origine because you can choose so many options!
We see a lot of them here in France (cause it's a local brand). The customer support looks good too, in case of problem with the frame or else. I went with a Canyon for budget issues and because I liked the grizl AL, but Origine was on top of my list for online brands for aluminium and carbon frames.
Curious to know why did you choose the Faran over the Secan? On a list of gravel bikes when the Secan is Fairlight´s former gravel bike, if I’m mistaken it’s the second time you chose the Faran, by the way I love my Secan 😎 and I’m tempted to order a Faran with wide 27.5 tires.
The thin design of GT Grade's top tube and seat stays would make me less confident in vibration-prone/rocky areas. I am sure it is tested, but I wonder how it holds up long term compared to aluminium or steel touring/bikepacking bikes. I get that they are meant for different purposes, but I would prefer a slightly more robust looking design.
I know it doesn't look tough, but the Grade is in its 3rd generation now! The design is well-proven.
The Gemini looks great, finally gearhub/gearbox bikes with dropbars. Too bad it costs double what my current bike budget is. And only seems to come in one boring colour.
Just bought that priority gravel bike, sadly its only in black but on the positive side virtually zero maintenance and less fragility for the win. Their mountainbikes are too heavy.
Did you check out Obed bikes? They are amazing!!
Thanks for the list
But 1 question: Criteria #1 is the upright frame design. What measurements/geometry data is best used to determine what is an upright frame design? From what I understand, a stack to reach over 1.5 is a good indicator.
But several bikes on this list have a stack to reach well below this. (Canyon Grizzl, Propain Terrel CF)
I´ve ridden a Canyon Grizl and that is not an upright frame design at all - it is a pretty aggressive riding position.
In the case of long top tube + short stem bikes, I'm looking primarily at the stack for a given size, as the distance from the saddle to the stem is often quite consistent.
The Grizl with a 20-30mm shorter stem is actually very close in size to the Salsa Journeyer, despite the Grizl having a ~1.4 STR compared to the Journeyer having a ~1.5 STR. Could it be that the Grizl you tested was a bit small, or was fitted with a stem that was too long?
But also, keep in mind that I'm weighing up multiple criteria when picking these bikes, so sometimes a bike that's not super upright will rise to the top due to its other attributes!
this sounds more like adventure bikes. is there such a category officially now? or it's in the ultra?
I’m very surprised the sonder doesn’t even get a mention
I have trek checkpoint, and geometry is not all that comfortable for a long day of riding, I wish it was more upright, what would be the best gravel bike with a good upright position if money is no issue?
Before giving up with your Checkpoint, have a look into riser drop bars! The Redshift Top Shelf raises your position by 50 or 70mm (2 or 2.75") to give you an ultra-comfortable upright riding position and easy access to the drops.
Try a longer higher angle stem raising your handlebar
Have you looked at the Polygon bend R7? This seems like a great bike at a reasonable price. Would be interested to hear your thoughts.
The Bend and Tambora models are right up there for me! Great price, quite upright, lots of mounts, and ideal climbing gear ratios on some models. 👍🏻
Appreciate your thoughts mate.
I always hated the GT bikes "triple triangle" design for their frames. I never understood why their steel/aluminium bikes back in the day actually had the seat stays joined to the seat post, making them heavier and stiffer with no benefit other than having a "signature look" for marketing (I was just ugly to me).
Though I like the design choices on this bike, I can't help thinking that the design working so well now (in carbon & seat tube disconnect) is more arse in trying to maintain their signature look then good design.
The Salsa Cutthroat ticks all your boxes. Not included because of its price ?
I'd expect it to show up on the off-road list; I think it's probably too mtb-adjacent to qualify as a gravel bike by most definitions.
For petite 5’4/11?
@Cyclingabout Question: Why the Faran over the Secan?
Secan is effectively a road bike with big tires, a posh Surly Midnight Special.
@@cjohnson3836 Strael is a road bike that can accommodate up to 35 mm tires, the Secan is a proper gravel bike.
Faran wins because of the mounts and price/performance criteria. Geometry is a wash looking at stack vs height. Trail is what will separare the two frames from each other I imagine.
@@omare_biketonature A gravel bike is more than just big tires. Secan has steep HTA, short stays resulting in short wheelbase, and a relatively high BB. Its a road bike with big tires (that's not a bad thing, there's a reason the midnight special is popular). There's a reason Fairlight's own marketing call it a Strael with big tires. Because it is. Its a road bike with big tires.
@@cjohnson3836 Eh, I think there's a lot of pedantry in cycling sometimes. Some people call gravel bikes a road bike with big tires, others call it a cyclocross bike, hybrid, 90s mountain bike... 🤷♂ I actually thought the video was just about gravel bikes and didn't notice the title included "Bikepacking" which makes the Faran the obvious choice over the Secan due to mounting points and beefier frame.
My wallet stopped watching after the Journeyer.
If you want the best value gravel bike and you're in continental Europe, you won't find any better then the Riverside GCR from Decathlon.
Carbon frame and SRAM Rival AXS for 3000€. 🤯
And there's a step up for 3800€ which has carbon wheels and Sram Force AXS!
I wonder if Priority is ever going to open a dealership in Europe...
What is the cheapest place (country) in Europe to pick up a gravel bike and bring back to Australia?
It'd have to be of the more competitive markets, so perhaps Germany? Don't forget to claim back the VAT!
Pls recommend more bikes under 1500$/€
Perfectas para las atiiculaciones y la prostata...todo sea x ir a la moda...
Great video! I'd like to just comment on the first criterion of comfort. As far as I know, a more aggressive, sportive position doesn't invariably equal lower comfort. This is a highly individual parameter, dependent on our level of flexibility and core strength. Proper bike fitting also plays a role. On a bike of a size chosen right to our body proportions and set correctly, one can feel equally or even more comfortable than on the frame forcing a more upright position. Said all this, more upward geometry makes probably for a safer choice for most of us.
Are there any Pinion gravel bikes with suspension?
The VIral Wanderer is the only one that comes to mind. Unless that's the perfect bike for you, it'll be best to upgrade the fork of a rigid Pinion bike yourself.
@@Cyclingabout Thank you for the response.
So much negativity in the comments. jeeez. Thx for the list and for taking the time.
No ultralight gravel bike from Specialized or the Diverge STR or the Niner MCR 9 RDO?
Yeah, even Specialized Roubaix with fork suspension is a good choice. All of these are premium and race oriented though.
The bikes look good but are no where near the best, be interesting to see the criteria and to be honest tyres and wheels play a huge part in comfort, control, and speed.
Wow giant or Santa Cruz or meridian didnt make the list
Why are most down handle bars?
Flat handle bars not good?
Subscribe button is right on top of the price :(
Damn, I didn't think about that! Will make sure not to make that mistake again. 👍🏻
How can anyone afford these bikes?
Im wondering how anyone can afford a vehicle as Im riding my bike to work.
influencers can. maybe they can influence you enough to spend a little bit more on bikes. Because everybody knows a bike that costs less than 1000 $ is shit. =).
I have a list of excellent gravel bikes under $1000 on my website! Still too expensive? Try finding one of these models second hand: www.cyclingabout.com/best-budget-gravel-bikes-with-drop-bars-under-1000/
never been more rich white folks than today. add to this, GPS w/ IPHONE cockpits, watt meters, and the bike packing myth where folks purchase a lot of styles of bags, straps, mounts, and then decide to get panniers.
@@gregknipe8772Non white here 😅 I have everything you’re mentioning except for watts meter and you’re right about the bikepacking bags, I also have bikepacking panniers and right now I have my eyes on the Mountain Laurel ultra light panniers, I spend my money on bikes, bags, outdoor gear and bikepacking trips.
I appreciate you mentioning stuff like the Journeyer, Grizzl, and Fairlight Faran, but man having a full carbon and also a $5000 ultralight bike set as "bikepacking bikes" just feels ridiculous coming from a guy that CLEARLY knows what he's talking about when it comes to durable bikes meant for traveling on.
Are we still doing top 10 lists? What year is this
What would you prefer?
no mention of canyon bikes?
The Grizl 7 is right there.
In my experience, I don't recommend a gravel bike for anyone with back problems, unless they are riding on paved roads.
I don't think you pay much attention to what is said on this channel. The whole idea is to have touring and bikepacking in mind, the geometry and swapping components to make rides comfortable. Anyone with back problem can also have terrible experience on full suspension with bad setup.
@@SonnyDarvishzadeh Well, kid, the key is to understand what "In my experience" means. After that, you may be able to start a debate. Just in order to make it not too long. I'd say that you don't have to worry, I've been riding every sort of bike since 82', any sort of frame material, over any terrain, and I've done it in several countries. And of course, I got my back injured. Just to let you know that I know what I'm talking about. Cheers.
Well if you want suspension buy a mtb bloody hell
One's bad enough, let alone ten.
The best gravel bikes are mountain bikes 🤣
meh, this is a bow to the current hype, and there are still road riders who have not purchased their "gravel bike". I prefer touring presentations, but I get it. there is untapped market with folks with money to burn. may as well jump in. next will be E-gravel bikes, then trikes. on and on.