A more Rewarding Career in a Low Cost Airline 🚀

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @guraytanc9732
    @guraytanc9732 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dont think Ryanair and Wizzair will consider a candidate to be hired again if he quit himself. At least thats what Ive heard.

    • @airlineselectionprogramme3156
      @airlineselectionprogramme3156  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually they do. If you gave them 8 years of service and come back after 3 because you wanted to see long haul… you gave them a lot and were a good employee, and just want to come back… I’ve heard of very many being rehired.

  • @LACSACR
    @LACSACR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What do you think about the majority of European airlines that obligate the pilot to pay for his own type rating compared to the rest of the world?

    • @airlineselectionprogramme3156
      @airlineselectionprogramme3156  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      +@LACSACR it’s been like this for a while now. Best accept it, get a type rating and start earning a wage. Pilots pay a lot for their education. But if you put it in perspective it lasts only for 3 years. Compare that to being wage less for 8 years as a student doctor. Or paying yourself through college in the US. Do I agree with it, no. But in my case if I hadn’t done it I’d not have hard the career I had. Also some low cost airlines invest back in you and give you exceptional training. Seen this way and considering you can be a captain at 25… and that your salary will only go up from there, the deal is not bad actually.

    • @SuraiyoKudratullayeva
      @SuraiyoKudratullayeva 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@airlineselectionprogramme3156 first of all thank you for the video! Mostly I agree with you in the perspective comparing to the doctors education. However airlines may suggest investments in your Type Rating and having contract for 5 years in return only if you are EU citizen. What about immigrants who have EASA license and nearly 0 opportunities to get hired by airlines?

    • @petersjeanpaul9071
      @petersjeanpaul9071 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @LACSACR The practice may seem disgusting at first sight, but it does make financial sense for the airline. Just imagine if Ryanair financed the TR for all the new pilots hired by the airline, what do you think would happen ? All pilots would receive TR + excellent training but would most probably leave the company as soon as they can for a better paying airline and that's precisely what the company does not want, to invest in people that will leave at the first opportunity. That's why the airline require 30,000€ to be paid upfront for the TR. They want the candidates to see their entry at the airline as a long term investment. Major airlines still finance TR with bond because they know pilots will most certainly stay on the long term, so financing it for the candidate makes sense

    • @LACSACR
      @LACSACR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@petersjeanpaul9071 Ryanair could demand a bonding time and retain the human talent. Like the rest of the World 🤷🏼‍♂️

    • @petersjeanpaul9071
      @petersjeanpaul9071 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LACSACRbut how do you retain talent ? Higher salary is the main lever for it, but that's the point of a low cost airline, to save on salaries too...