Nanotechnology’s Promise: A Big Risk in a Small Package?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 50

  • @christopherkeller7734
    @christopherkeller7734 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's been in our food for years. We're already loaded to the gills, and no mainstream doctor will even discuss this.

  • @brokestudentinschool2731
    @brokestudentinschool2731 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I really did like how you mentioned we need to consider both the positive and negative ramifications of Technology before you continue developing it or consider releasing it to the public

  • @GrowBagUK
    @GrowBagUK 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The environment is already full of plastic nanoparticles :(

  • @thomastedder654
    @thomastedder654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    As in the Days of Noah, all flesh is becoming corrupted but for the sake of the Elect , Jesus Christ will return in shorter time for if He didn't there would be no flesh to save.
    Just say no to this nefarious plan of combining humanity and machine.
    I was born human and I'll die human.

  • @bajpaidevansh3864
    @bajpaidevansh3864 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    OK people in the comments are very judgemental about somasundaran. I perfecly understood him and there is really no need to say things like 'They should call a better english speaker ' and all that. Its not english science festival. Be a lil' nice people and btw thank you utube for recommending this video it was great to the end

  • @theodorebanta9898
    @theodorebanta9898 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    They dodge the labeling question by saying it's a really good question

  • @francarranza434
    @francarranza434 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How many people here believe our cell phones are already linked atomically to our brain?

  • @professorscambuster3063
    @professorscambuster3063 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not including Robert Freitas and Ralph Merkle on a panel about nanotechnology? So cruel.

  • @minegold975
    @minegold975 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nanomachines son

  • @Greenninjadjh
    @Greenninjadjh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting for sure.. not that well discussed though. A little meandering with no real direction from either the host or the panel.. aside from the panelists personal lens and agendas.

  • @benjamindemontgomery6317
    @benjamindemontgomery6317 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Would you need a even smaller particle to clean up a nano particle from the environment? Hmmmmm I Think the nano problem is relay Big problem.

  • @richard2436
    @richard2436 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    vicki colvin has an attitude that's disturbing to me.

  • @sambodhi17
    @sambodhi17 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is nanotechnology risky for humans?

    • @ihsankamil6279
      @ihsankamil6279 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Everything has risks and benefits it’s not black and white silly

  • @DeconvertedMan
    @DeconvertedMan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I want my nanotech! :D

  • @KplusU
    @KplusU 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What kind of person can not even watch the whole thing and put a thumbs down on it?

    • @wimterminator9177
      @wimterminator9177 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      a person who by default is afraid of change can do that

    • @professorscambuster3063
      @professorscambuster3063 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wim Terminator Those people ignore statistics because it doesn't fit their grim narrative that everything is somehow getting worse, but we know damn well that if the actual data was on their side, they wouldn't shut up about it. How dare technology improve to the point of good medicine for the elderly. lol

    • @xthe_moonx
      @xthe_moonx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wimterminator9177 soo...conservatives?

    • @UnleashTheGreen
      @UnleashTheGreen 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      i gave it a thumbs down because it is laced with corporate slock while at the same time being a very pedestrian talk on nano tech. this was not about science but selling people on beliefs. what did you derive from this talk?

  • @sapphirestone3371
    @sapphirestone3371 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Frightening

  • @richnlv
    @richnlv 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sad that we have freedom of speech but you cant even say what sunscreen you use..

  • @brandoncurrypitcher1945
    @brandoncurrypitcher1945 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nano machines son!

  • @WildNwhEELING
    @WildNwhEELING 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope me and BILL GATES don't meet in a dark Alley, only one going to exit

  • @mfanto1
    @mfanto1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "nanoparticles have been there for centuries" these are scientists lol

    • @DeconvertedMan
      @DeconvertedMan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      pay attention to what the context is.

  • @Thedudeabides803
    @Thedudeabides803 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Subtitle the middle guy. Goodness.

    • @istvansipos9940
      @istvansipos9940 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      or just don't invite him to a TALK. let him do the work I'm sure he is brilliant at, and invite a better speaker (of English)

    • @markanthonysalazar1974
      @markanthonysalazar1974 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I heal in a couple of days you talk nano and bio well I am .. ... Look my synapses surface are reacts to stimulus....dumb shit

  • @abz998
    @abz998 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    My man Somasundaran always off topic.

    • @professorscambuster3063
      @professorscambuster3063 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's another reason why Eric Drexler would have been nice to include on the panel.

    • @JuliaHelen777
      @JuliaHelen777 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I found him actualy the most considerate. Yes, difficult to understand his speaking but once I gave the full focus it was manageable.
      At which point into the discussion did you found him "off topic"?

  • @JohnSmith-td7hd
    @JohnSmith-td7hd 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please edit your videos for time.