Former US President Barack Obama’s $11.75 million dollar purchase of an island waterfront estate at Martha's Vineyard, ought to tell you how concerned he is about, “How climate change, rising sea levels are transforming coastlines around the world”
But the actual measured temperature record shows something different: There have been hot years and hot decades since the turn of the last century, and colder years and colder decades. But the overall measured temperature shows no clear trend over the last century, at least not one that suggests runaway warming. That is, until the NOAA's statisticians "adjust" the data. Using complex statistical models, they change the data to reflect not reality, but their underlying theories of global warming. That's clear from a simple fact of statistics: Data generate random errors, which cancel out over time. So by averaging data, the errors mostly disappear. That's not what NOAA does. According to the NOAA, the errors aren't random. They're systematic. As we noted, all of their temperature adjustments lean cooler in the distant past, and warmer in the more recent past. But they're very fuzzy about why this should be. Far from legitimately "adjusting" anything, it appears they are cooking the data to show a politically correct trend toward global warming. Not by coincidence, that has been part and parcel of the government's underlying policies for the better part of two decades. What NOAA does aren't niggling little changes, either. As Tony Heller at the Real Climate Science web site notes, "Pre-2000 temperatures are progressively cooled, and post-2000 temperatures are warmed. This year has been a particularly spectacular episode of data tampering by NOAA, as they introduce nearly 2.5 degrees of fake warming since 1895." So the global warming scare is basically a hoax. SOURCE, INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY
@@yvonneplant9434 May I suggest you learn about reality, and it can be found right here on yt... simply search : 'The In-Depth Story Behind a Climate Fraud'. We do not have a climate emergency, we are simply experiencing a changing climate. So we shall adapt or perish. And unless an asteroid vaporizes humans from the earth, something tells me we shall adapt. Keep in mind that our Homo-sapien ancestors have managed to adapt for the last 300,000 years while experiencing some very drastic changes to our climate.
phew I was worried these stupid science people knew something we didn't. Thank you so much for your expertise in the field. How many years have you worked in it again?
@@dealhunter4536 thousands, think about this. Take the average human life, let's say 80 years. Now take one half of a second of that entire life. That is one year compared to the earth's age. Nice try climate scammers.
Quotes from the WEF playbook: In 1991, the Club of Rome published The First Global Revolution.[8] It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the "problematique". It notes that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common: "The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself-when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing."[9]: 70 "Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons devised." "In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.
Explain how the water in Peru is so cold that the sea vegetation is not blooming to feed the Mahi. The Mahi need 21 degrees Celsius to thrive, but the waters are only 17 degrees Celsius. The climate is getting colder, not warmer. When is the media going to stop spreading untruths.
This whole sham will fall apart in the next 20 years, mark my words. A solar minimum is already underway and it will become so apparent even the least informed will be able to call bs.
I must be missing something - this video is headlined something like "Climate change is transforming coastlines around the world". But I don't recall Ginger Zee mentioning the immense flooding in Pakistan within the last couple of months, something she should have taken into account. This is a version of taking an insupportable and obviously unsustainable crisis - made by humans, yet, and offering no solutions or even raising the question of solutions, thus essentially sugar-coating the problem while holding no one to account. This is the sort of news we've come to expect from Walt Disney Corporation, who are probably well-married into the families of ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and so on. The same people, in other words, who are destroying the planet are left to report on the damage they do.
Could they be a later generation of the same “people” that seduced Eve in the garden? An attack on mankind. Just sayin’. You make an excellent point on climate change. Here’s what I think about the climate change agenda. Plants thrive on Co2. Less Co2=Less plants. Less plants=Less crops. Less crops=Less food. Less food=Less people. Less people=Population Control. These are the “people” that run our corporations, monetary system, media, universities and governments. It may sound far fetched, but definitely worth thinking about. I think you are definitely on to something. And what about that recent pandemic and the “solution” they offered us? The “cure” being worse than the disease. Was it by design?
I'm shocked... SHOCKED I tell you that a story about US beach erosion didn't mention Pakistan. This is a 5 minute segment to get a simple point in some American's heads. You can't talk some people into action until they recognize the problem.
"Sea level rising" does not affect all areas equally. In places like Sweden, where the land rising is outpacing the sea level, you won't feel a thing. The only real victims are the disappearing island nations.
@@roberthicks1612 "The funny thing is, those islands are growing, not disappearing" those islands? AH The Climate Discussion Nexus I'll lie and ignorance believes
@@goe1punkNo, the news was reported in an oceanography science specific journal. A study by satellites showed the size of islands were not shrinking as predicted but growing. Those islands are mostly sand from the ocean and every time there is a storm, more sand is deposited. As per usual, Alarmist ignore REAL science. Rather than pay attention to what REAL scientist say in journals that you must be an expert to get an article written and which is only reviewed by experts in that field, they insist on only reading "science" in journals that do not require you to be an expert in the field you write about, nor require the reviewer to be an expert in that field as long as both claim to be "climatologist". That's why you get articles written by geologist talking about reefs disappearing or atmospheric scientist writing articles about disappearing islands. As long as you claim to be a climatologist, you are assumed to know every bit of science in the world and be an expert at it.
@@roberthicks1612 you must not live on an island or you don’t know anyone living on an island. I have family that are struggling because of the rising sea levels.
Foolish waste of money. You will not defeat the ocean. Retreat willingly, or by Mother Natures wrath, but retreat is how this ends for low lying coastal areas.
Continental drift is about 25mm a year. This invalidates all sea level gauge data. But understanding that would be difficult for a modern climate scientist.
@@bizzjoe No, its true. Decades ago, they choose to drain a swamp on the west side of the city. Either they did not know, or did not care that it fed an aquafer beneath the city. Studies using gps satellites have proven that the city is sinking as a result of the aquafer drying up and the land settling into the space the water used to take up. The sea will rise pretty much everywhere equally and many geological stable sea ports have shown the sea is rising at about 1-1.5mm a year. Miami is sinking at a rate of 4-6mm a year. Combine that and you get a rate of about 5-7.5 mm a year loss to the sea. They say the city has lost 150mm in 25 years with is 6mm per year. That is right in the center of what the combined amount is. So a quarter of the loss is due to rising sea and 3/4th is due to them sinking.
If you get a completly full glass of ice water and let all of the ice melt, The water Won't spill out of the cup, because the same ammount of matter is in the cup but just in a different state. It's basic chemistry guys don't be stupid.
😢The Ocean level (as recorded at Fort Denison in Sydney Harbour in Australia) , reveals that no change whatsoever has occured to ocean levels since 1870.❤
La naturaleza [en conjunto] es un ser vivo y cuando se le agrede exponencialmente, responde con daño exponencial, lo cual es evidente cada día que pasa.
Miami Beach are building amazing, beautiful buildings, very expensive. Why are they doing that when we all know? In 30 years from now, everything is gonna be on the water.
Excellent video ! Solution: Shut down all oil and coal companies world wide, then go all-solar for power generation. Short term, build 20 foot high sea walls along the coasts, then let our grandchildren deal with the issues.
Why is it no one is taking about buying goods made in places like China? Panamax ships use over 60,000 gallons of diesel fuel each day. And they travel at approximately 25 MPH. And on any given day there are 5,000 Panamax ships underway. The world would benefit greatly if everyone would buy Domestic Goods over Chines goods. What happened to "No matter the cost"?
I'd happily buy Australian goods here to problem my wages decimated by 10 years of below inflation rises won't allow me to do that Aside from that I don't decide where the things I buy are made the greedy profit seeking ahole that run companies decided that
@@jaykanta4326 There is no science that can prove this illogical claim of an ice filled asteroid hitting earth and giving us water. Evolution is a scientific impossibility that defies just about every principle of the laws of physics. One more thing, theories dont describe facts. Facts would confirm theories. If you have a fact, you dont need a theory.
Its silly to want to live in an area at risk of hurricane. I would have moved out from there to somewhere safer, rather than rebuilding it for another storm to rip it apart
Y'all funny.. you feel that way stop driving. Oh that's right you really don't care if that's the case. The climate changes duh . You want it to be sunny everyday 😂😂
There is something that doesn’t add up in these reports. Over 95% of water on earth is in the oceans. About 1% is in the atmosphere and 1.7% is tied up in ice and snow. If all that melted, how on earth could it raise the sea levels as high as these people claim?
I am totally in favor of global warming. I hate the long, cold winters in Colorado where I live. So a year ago I began focusing on raising my carbon footprint. So far I have raised the average daily temperature in Colorado by 4 degrees. I will continue until I can grow palm trees in my yard.
Agreed, we could use another couple degrees of warming in mid to high latitudes. It's clear that animals thrive in warmer temperatures and we shouldn't forget that humans are a tropical species.
I’m afraid global warming can not alter the day length, so your winters will always be long, and may seem even longer due to increased cloud cover. An easier solution for you migh t be to move to a lower latitude.
Earth has been changing for billions of year's, you cant stop that. It's making billions of dollars off it and taking away human rights and trying to rule the world that is wrong and won't be tolerated. Young people are being used because they enjoy a good riot and are easily manipulated. (Example: There are still only 2 genders, you are a boy turned into a woman or a woman turned into a boy= 2 genders...iPod gen 1 cost $800, and walkmans that play cassette tapes cost $500) How about we go back to landlines and give up cell phones because someone said it's better?
Fort myers, Sanibel island, Daytona etc the recent hardest hit beaches haven't done any beach renourishment projects in years. Their beaches were extremely small and they had zero dunes for protection. This is what happens when you neglect your beaches. ALL OF THE BEACHES we renourished in the past few years had very little damage. Just minor erosion. Florida might want to plan a massive never seen before beach renourishment plan to include building a much higher in elevation Beach that goes out into the water atleast a few hundred feet and build massive rows of dunes for protection similar to what New Jersey and the OBX are doing. This is Florida's wake up call imho.
I'd look who specifically was deciding to ignore the beaches. Were they just those who didn't want to pay taxes or climate deniers... or both or something else.
Sure, blame it on the engineers smh. Instead of blaming the engineers, why don’t you open your eyes and understand how the increased concentration of carbon dioxide, a known greenhouse gas, is warming up the planet and is causing the glaciers to melt at an increasing rate. People have been building on the coasts for thousands of years and have never experienced these problems.
mother nature said put some respect on her name. This was very interesting and it makes you think deeper about how we have little to zero control over what God put into this world concerning all forms of nature, we can try to post pone or go around but eventually Nature will win
Why is it a problem? I have an rv lot on the port tobacco river and I can’t get a boat in and out of there. I need some damn global warming. Y’all ain’t driving enough. Actually that’s a very old port and used to be the richest place in the world from tobacco. But it filled up with silt from so much tobacco farming. It used to be a deep port and now it’s only 5 feet deep. And the silt and erosion kills the fish and ruins the bay. Your worries are not really that rational. For the ocean it’s not going to be too high or too low. It’s going to be. Environmentally we have to put a ton of effort stopping erosion to keep see levels up. We can save a lot of energy on excavation if we don’t have to worry about that.
No. Sea level appears to be rising at a small and steady 3mm per year. It is neither acclerating or decelerating. The trend is linear. As regards NOAA tide gauge data, let's look at some examples from around the world. N.B. All sites show a linear Relative Sea Level Trend: Kanmen, China 2.40mm/yr; Sydney, Australia 0.75mm/yr; Ferandina Beach, Florida 2.20mm/yr; Los Angeles, California 1.04mm/yr; Mera, Japan 3.8mm; Cascais, Portugal 1.32mm/yr. Remember, all linear over many decades, or more than a century. No acceleration (or deceleration for that matter). Anyway, if you prefer satellite data NOAA's trend was +3.0mm/year Global Mean Sea Level (1993-2022), again linear last time I looked (but hey, it may have accelerated in the last month). NASA satellite data (1993-present) for Global Mean Sea Level shows a linear rise of 3.3mm per year. All linear. No acceleration, so no relationship to the exponential increase in CO2 in the atmosphere. It's going to be decades before even your big toe is submerged.
Linearity (or close to - the data does indicate an accelerating trend, albeit a mild one, over the last couple of decades, which would agree with what is inarguably an accelerating ice melt trend) is not proof of “no relationship” with man made causes.
Or, here’s a thought. We could stop driving in smoke machines, and we could switch to renewables. Why are you republicans afraid of literally any change? We have used oil since the mid 1800s, why can’t we switch?
@@nt_partlycloudy21 Sure and we can all ride unicorns too. We can switch WHEN science makes it possible. It is not now. Rare earth metals are just that, rare. We do not have enough of them to create a society that can be able to depend on renewables as they are now. Republicans are not afraid of change, they are just willing to understand that the vast majority of Americans can not afford to use renewables. Democrats also know this but expect the "deploryable walmart shoppers" to just walk or take the bus and do without heating or air conditioning. Things like cars and home ownerships, according to the democrats, should be limited to the elites.
@@roberthicks1612 Actually, if more went to electric vehicles those walmart shoppers would be better off since there would be even more used gas vehicles on the market... lowering their cost. Plus, demand for gas would go down and thus the price as well. And by the time they wear out those gas vehicles there would be tons of used electric vehicles on the market. What would actually hurt those walmart shoppers is if we held off until the point we had to make the change ALL at once. Then yeah, they would be hurting since they would have no choice but to get a new vehicle or take the bus. Btw, I think the "rare elements" aren't actually rare. They just were thought to be rare when they named them. That said, they do have to be dug up and extracted kind of like how we do with gold. I'm not sure if the process is more or less expensive to do than drilling for oil or fracking.
Build houses on sand and do not expect they will exist for ever. That is what nature does. Some areas of land are rising and some are falling. There are areas around the globe where the sea level heights are actually falling. Oslo (Denmark) since 1885, it has been dropping at a rate of 3.12 mm per year according to NOAA. By 2123 it will have dropped 31 cms. Juneau (Alaska) since 1936 has been falling at the rate of 13 mm per year according to NOAA data. By 2123 it will have dropped 1.34 metres. Quebec (Canada) has been dropping since 1910 according to NOAA data at the rate 0.16 mm per yea. In 2123 it will fall by an amazing 1.52 cms. Stockholm (Sweden) is falling at the rate of 3.77 mm per year since 1889 according to data records held by NOAA. In 2123 it will have fallen 37.79 cms. Indian Creek Island (Florida) will rise by 57. 6 cms by 2123. The Battery (New York) will rise 28.93 cms by 2123. So yes there are some places which will sea level rises by a foot. Martha's Vineyard will see a sea level rise of about 30 cms by 2123 as will Boston and Plymouth Rock. So while the east coast appears to be having sea level rises of about a foot, on the west coast Santa Barbara will have a 9 cm rise by the year 2123. There are numerous other locations which have minimal change over the next 100 years. I watched a film on Puerto Rico which showed beach erosion after a storm surge brought on by a hurricane. It was all climate change and sea levels rising. They showed a NOAA map indicating sea levels were rising. When you looked at the top of the NOAA data chart it clearly stated that sea level rise was 2mm per year. The same with these beach houses, was that they were built on sand. Now I have provided you with a few facts. Yes the sea levels will rise. In the previous inter glacials the seas were 2 metres higher. So It is quite possible that will occur again. We also know when we had the last glacial the sea levels around the world fell by 100 metres or more. This has nothing to do with the burning of fossil fuels. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is about 0.04% of all the gases. If we get some more there is a good chance we may see deserts green again. Species come and go and that includes us. There are always factors which eradicate species. It could be a virus or it could be a meteor. And, yes man may play a part.
Ask your self if the water is 1 ft in one area & 1/2 in another on the same coast and close together something is wrong with that picture. the MORE they try to fill in the more damage the do to the actual original coast WHATS been put their is ERODING not what was orginally there
40yrs ago when I was growing up in SoCal, there would be a big Pacific storm and parts of PCH would wash out and landslides would take out homes, as Jonny Carson (oh wait he’s dead). Back then we called it weather.
Maybe stop manipulating the weather and then blaming cows and regular people, all while certain people live it up on their private jets..eating steak while they try to sell us on Bugs!
So. If sea levels are actually changing. I guess NASA's launch pad is just got the same shoreline as decades ago cause in pics from the same spot. It's the exact same shoreline how exactly. There's even other places from further back with pics of the shore and it's the same. No change in level.... Over 50 plus years.... Are they sure some places aren't just sinking....
"A war they hope to one day to win...", is without a doubt the dumbest damn thing I've heard today, but the day is young and I'm certain the MSM can come up with even dumber shyte as the day proceeds. What left me agape was the fellow in Pinellas who said the sea level there had risen 6" in 6 yrs., if I heard him correctly. Not to worry coastal Floridians, Our Mad King Donald opined in his Mar-a-Lago castle by the sea that "they say the ocean (we have 5 here on earth) will rise 1/8th inch in the next 200-300 yrs". That's straight from the Greatest Mind who knows more than the scientists, so, MAGATS, you know you can believe it!
@@havenmist2216 It was not my comment, but that fellow in the video. Along the East Coast of the US, the sea is rising 4mm/yr., but rate is increasing and may be 5mm now, so 1"/5yrs. All of these climate collapse stats are accelerating, so rates are increasing by the day. At today's rate, sea level on the East Coast rises 1' in 60yrs., 2082. Thanks for the reply! Stress R Us
@@havenmist2216 Thanks for that little bit of cherry picked nothing. Tell it to the inundated South Sea nations, or the collapsing sea front homes on the US East Coast. The East Coast sea level rise data is easily available from reliable sources on the net, 4-5mm/yr. The massive fresh water contributions of billions of gallons of glacial melt are well known. You are obviously a corporate shill sycophant and I won't tell you in public what I really think of you. Can you guess? Stress R Us
@@havenmist2216 Your MAGAT infested mentation is obvious now. Good luck with that and enjoy the ever more energetic record setting storms and flooding on your West Coast. And, BTW, I shill for no-one, unlike your dishonest MAGAT ridden self.
@@emack76 Yes, that certainly is part of the answer, I think. But what about storage of electricity to power cars and trucks? Today’s batteries are nowhere near as good as they need to be.
@@emack76 What types of synthetic fuels? For use in internal combustion engines or some other type of engine? By the way, thanks for giving thoughtful, reasonable answers.
@@bobs3354 yup, direct replacement and no engine modifications necessary. It’s already being done. You can get them at auto part stores in the US. It’s expensive but can be scaled up to be more reasonable in price. This isn’t a bad use for solar power either.
People are finding whale bones deep in ground in Central FL we were underwater this planet has existed for longer the I can fathom to say its going to say the way it is right now is far from the truth as I'm sure we're all aware of. It's happens slowlyyy with natural events assisting in shaping of the land and everything else in the environment. It's inevitable but very interesting
La Agenda2030 y cohorte de palanganeros [EU-UE-CN-GB-AUS] deben dar por terminada la operación de ingeniería cosmética sobre el planeta Tierra: Su misión ha fracasado. El marxismo cultural ha muerto.
At least one St. James 6-1 level not your real friend is whispering to one Tennessee Avenue woman, "you know, we prudes think it's ok for that true savior if the result of persecution would then be all your Tennessee Ave. (Monopoly) sisters even ending up on some unthinkable continuing super serious invincible difficult day of Valhalla lining the roads on crucifixes! like the natural inheritance to be coated with, if the persecution isn't enjoined, on the way down to purgatory regarding the issues it resolves. Pay? the urge to let someone offensive to the least conflicting age concern rot, 3 eons ago. Not one Tennessee Avenue human whispers "pay him!" to New York Avenue, regarding options, truths, or sciences. Extreme difficulties regarding persecution of people of all ages might only be encapsulated in how many farms it might be nice to respond and address safety issues, or... anything else less vastly less productively popular, or tolerable or free the way ordinary people wake up to situations, not never return from. I really am their savior. Rumors become simple objections and hostile rules and the same laws of terror.
THE BIBLE IS THE NEWSPAPER OF THE FUTURE. LUKE 21:25-28 ROARING WAVES REVELATION 12:12 THIS IS NOT THE WRATH OF GOD MATTHEW 24:7 EARTHQUAKES IN DIVERS PLACES 1 PETER 3:7-13 THE PROMISE OF GOD JOHN 3:16,17 BILLY GRAHAM SAID, ONLY BELIEVE!
Who could have imagined building on sea shores will cause buildings to collapse..
Former US President Barack Obama’s $11.75 million dollar purchase of an island waterfront estate at Martha's Vineyard, ought to tell you how concerned he is about, “How climate change, rising sea levels are transforming coastlines around the world”
Yip .. but the sheep will still believe the scaremongering
Exactly.
Losing that property won't happen in his lifetime. He's 61. Your real concern is that the only black potus can afford that property.
he said it would stop when he was elected
@@AndrewBurbo-zw6pf .. It's too late.. we only have 5 minutes to live ... good luck my friend..
We don't need to save our beaches. Remove the homes and adapt the towns. Don't support sea walls.
Shouldn’t have been building expensive houses right on the beach 😢
Doing that has always been dumb.
Never build your house on sinking sand flew right over the cuckoo nest
Yet they keep doing it, yeah the same people who are telling us there is a climage crisis.
I know this might sound crazy but don’t build a house on a sandy beach cliff with 0 foundation rock
Easier said than done!
@@dealhunter4536 idk bro building a house on a beach is hard
Why are officials buying beachfront property if seas are rising?
@@Blazeww Gay strawman, and I don't care
I would love a house by the shore but I know Mother Nature 🌬️
@Victor Novic You are part of Mother Nature! She created you.
@@meghan42 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth" (Genesis 1:1).
Then why did Obama buy beachfront property on Martha's Vineyard?
Mother Nature has been taking beachfront property for tens of thousands of years. The oceans will rise and there is no stopping it.
@@chucklesthered2338 it will stop when all the ice melts again and there will still be plenty of beachfront property left.
But the actual measured temperature record shows something different: There have been hot years and hot decades since the turn of the last century, and colder years and colder decades. But the overall measured temperature shows no clear trend over the last century, at least not one that suggests runaway warming.
That is, until the NOAA's statisticians "adjust" the data. Using complex statistical models, they change the data to reflect not reality, but their underlying theories of global warming. That's clear from a simple fact of statistics: Data generate random errors, which cancel out over time. So by averaging data, the errors mostly disappear.
That's not what NOAA does.
According to the NOAA, the errors aren't random. They're systematic. As we noted, all of their temperature adjustments lean cooler in the distant past, and warmer in the more recent past. But they're very fuzzy about why this should be.
Far from legitimately "adjusting" anything, it appears they are cooking the data to show a politically correct trend toward global warming. Not by coincidence, that has been part and parcel of the government's underlying policies for the better part of two decades.
What NOAA does aren't niggling little changes, either.
As Tony Heller at the Real Climate Science web site notes, "Pre-2000 temperatures are progressively cooled, and post-2000 temperatures are warmed. This year has been a particularly spectacular episode of data tampering by NOAA, as they introduce nearly 2.5 degrees of fake warming since 1895."
So the global warming scare is basically a hoax.
SOURCE, INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY
The comments you are allowed to see [here] do not represent actual public discourse on this matter. This should trouble you greatly.
Exactly
Climate change deniers are not being silenced since they still talking.
@@yvonneplant9434 .. The climate has been changing ever since the dawn of time
@@yvonneplant9434 May I suggest you learn about reality, and it can be found right here on yt... simply search : 'The In-Depth Story Behind a Climate Fraud'. We do not have a climate emergency, we are simply experiencing a changing climate. So we shall adapt or perish. And unless an asteroid vaporizes humans from the earth, something tells me we shall adapt. Keep in mind that our Homo-sapien ancestors have managed to adapt for the last 300,000 years while experiencing some very drastic changes to our climate.
@@yvonneplant9434 do a search here on YT for "operation popeye" The Gubment has been altering the climate for decades. #FACTSMATTER
erosion of coasts is natural..... always has been.
phew I was worried these stupid science people knew something we didn't. Thank you so much for your expertise in the field. How many years have you worked in it again?
@@AndTecks The climate has always been changing. Been changing for thousands of years.
@@dealhunter4536 we both agree on that but I will take my advice from the hundreds of thousands of scientists around the world.
@@dealhunter4536 Yes, climate change has always happened. But it's the RATE of change that is concerning.
@@dealhunter4536 thousands, think about this. Take the average human life, let's say 80 years. Now take one half of a second of that entire life. That is one year compared to the earth's age. Nice try climate scammers.
Quotes from the WEF playbook:
In 1991, the Club of Rome published The First Global Revolution.[8] It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the "problematique". It notes that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in common: "The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself-when things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing."[9]: 70 "Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new strategies imagined, and new weapons devised."
"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together.
These homes should not be allowed to be rebuilt.
Sea level is only rising in certain places. The oceans are lumpy and not flat as once thought.
Explain how the water in Peru is so cold that the sea vegetation is not blooming to feed the Mahi. The Mahi need 21 degrees Celsius to thrive, but the waters are only 17 degrees Celsius. The climate is getting colder, not warmer. When is the media going to stop spreading untruths.
"It doesn't matter what the truth is, it only matters what the people will believe" -Club of Rome
This whole sham will fall apart in the next 20 years, mark my words. A solar minimum is already underway and it will become so apparent even the least informed will be able to call bs.
Its la nina.
I must be missing something - this video is headlined something like "Climate change is transforming coastlines around the world". But I don't recall Ginger Zee mentioning the immense flooding in Pakistan within the last couple of months, something she should have taken into account. This is a version of taking an insupportable and obviously unsustainable crisis - made by humans, yet, and offering no solutions or even raising the question of solutions, thus essentially sugar-coating the problem while holding no one to account. This is the sort of news we've come to expect from Walt Disney Corporation, who are probably well-married into the families of ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, and so on. The same people, in other words, who are destroying the planet are left to report on the damage they do.
Could they be a later generation of the same “people” that seduced Eve in the garden? An attack on mankind. Just sayin’. You make an excellent point on climate change. Here’s what I think about the climate change agenda. Plants thrive on Co2. Less Co2=Less plants. Less plants=Less crops. Less crops=Less food. Less food=Less people. Less people=Population Control. These are the “people” that run our corporations, monetary system, media, universities and governments. It may sound far fetched, but definitely worth thinking about. I think you are definitely on to something. And what about that recent pandemic and the “solution” they offered us? The “cure” being worse than the disease. Was it by design?
She's reading a teleprompter.
Spot on .
Only people ruining the planet are those stopping coal and gas and oil. Need development not going back in time.
I'm shocked... SHOCKED I tell you that a story about US beach erosion didn't mention Pakistan. This is a 5 minute segment to get a simple point in some American's heads. You can't talk some people into action until they recognize the problem.
It would be great. Who cares about how it would effect the economy?
"Sea level rising" does not affect all areas equally. In places like Sweden, where the land rising is outpacing the sea level, you won't feel a thing. The only real victims are the disappearing island nations.
The funny thing is, those islands are growing, not disappearing.
@@roberthicks1612 "The funny thing is, those islands are growing, not disappearing"
those islands?
AH
The Climate Discussion Nexus
I'll lie and ignorance believes
The victims here are the American taxpayers, as usual. $1billion in climate "reparations" from Uncle Joe?
@@goe1punkNo, the news was reported in an oceanography science specific journal. A study by satellites showed the size of islands were not shrinking as predicted but growing. Those islands are mostly sand from the ocean and every time there is a storm, more sand is deposited.
As per usual, Alarmist ignore REAL science. Rather than pay attention to what REAL scientist say in journals that you must be an expert to get an article written and which is only reviewed by experts in that field, they insist on only reading "science" in journals that do not require you to be an expert in the field you write about, nor require the reviewer to be an expert in that field as long as both claim to be "climatologist".
That's why you get articles written by geologist talking about reefs disappearing or atmospheric scientist writing articles about disappearing islands. As long as you claim to be a climatologist, you are assumed to know every bit of science in the world and be an expert at it.
@@roberthicks1612 you must not live on an island or you don’t know anyone living on an island. I have family that are struggling because of the rising sea levels.
Glad I sold my beach house
Thats called erosion ,look at some of the very old lighthouses.. do your own research people.
You are worried for your houses , But you are not worried for your spiritual life
Its the ancestors. When it rains on us all. In retribution for what was done to the idigenous ppls of this planet
The government's greed and lack of people changing lifestyles this world will die
Exactly
ok Debbie Downer
And yet there are plenty of pictures of coastlines from the 1880s where everything looks identical.
There is no way to measure sea level rise. Have you heard of land movement?
That’s why we have universities and people with PhD’s, so people like you can relax and let them figure these things out.
@@emotown1 I am smarter than they are.
Foolish waste of money.
You will not defeat the ocean.
Retreat willingly, or by Mother Natures wrath,
but retreat is how this ends for low lying coastal areas.
Erosion is changing coast lines., not rising seas.
Continental drift is about 25mm a year. This invalidates all sea level gauge data. But understanding that would be difficult for a modern climate scientist.
Or to be different “ Agriculture products exporting nations “ ( APEN )
The United States and the world should use Desalination to stop rising sea levels spread the word please!
If sea levels are rising then why are banks still making 30 year mortgages in Florida? Answer: because they are not rising!
Sorry for you guys . but nothing in this world is permanent
dating life that bad?
Pyramids?
And yet Miami is booming.
It is also sinking 3 times the rate of sea level rises.
@@roberthicks1612 .. Nonsense
@@bizzjoe No, its true. Decades ago, they choose to drain a swamp on the west side of the city. Either they did not know, or did not care that it fed an aquafer beneath the city. Studies using gps satellites have proven that the city is sinking as a result of the aquafer drying up and the land settling into the space the water used to take up.
The sea will rise pretty much everywhere equally and many geological stable sea ports have shown the sea is rising at about 1-1.5mm a year. Miami is sinking at a rate of 4-6mm a year. Combine that and you get a rate of about 5-7.5 mm a year loss to the sea. They say the city has lost 150mm in 25 years with is 6mm per year. That is right in the center of what the combined amount is.
So a quarter of the loss is due to rising sea and 3/4th is due to them sinking.
@@bizzjoe just because you don’t understand it, doesn’t mean that it is untrue.
They have “ OPEC “. I think we should form “ APEC “ ( Agricultural products exporting
countries)
If you get a completly full glass of ice water and let all of the ice melt, The water Won't spill out of the cup, because the same ammount of matter is in the cup but just in a different state. It's basic chemistry guys don't be stupid.
I can't wait to purchase my Overpriced home along the Florida coast soon. Me and my wife are so excited 😊 🤗 🤪
Make sure you invest in good life vests; might wake up floating.
😢The Ocean level (as recorded at Fort Denison in Sydney Harbour in Australia) , reveals that no change whatsoever has occured to ocean levels since 1870.❤
If its 60 below zero at the north pole, and the temperature rises 2 degrees, how does that melt the ice?
We need to invest heavily in clean renewable energy and build a time machine.
I would blame the idiots blowing things up in the ocean and the idiots throwing crap in our oceans and THEN you have just the normal climate …..
La naturaleza [en conjunto] es un ser vivo y cuando se le agrede exponencialmente, responde con daño exponencial, lo cual es evidente cada día que pasa.
I just read the comments section and I am sad to say there is no hope for humanity.
And that could be a low estimate, as it gets experiential.
Miami Beach are building amazing, beautiful buildings, very expensive. Why are they doing that when we all know? In 30 years from now, everything is gonna be on the water.
Sea level was nearly 400 feet lower than today 20,000 years ago so I understand. How do you reconcile this to today’s claims in this area?
Excellent video ! Solution: Shut down all oil and coal companies world wide, then go all-solar for power generation. Short term, build 20 foot high sea walls along the coasts, then let our grandchildren deal with the issues.
Why is it no one is taking about buying goods made in places like China?
Panamax ships use over 60,000 gallons of diesel fuel each day. And they travel at approximately 25 MPH. And on any given day there are 5,000 Panamax ships underway.
The world would benefit greatly if everyone would buy Domestic Goods over Chines goods. What happened to "No matter the cost"?
I'd happily buy Australian goods here to problem my wages decimated by 10 years of below inflation rises won't allow me to do that
Aside from that I don't decide where the things I buy are made the greedy profit seeking ahole that run companies decided that
According to scientists, billions yrs ago, earth was hit with asteroids with massive amount of ice.
And that’s how we got H2O ( hydrogen & oxygen).
Not quite, but sso?
Some scientists believe in evolution, therefore this story could make sense to them.
@@Joskemom no. That’s what the scientific evidence clearly indicates. But it’s trivia when discussing climate change
@@Joskemom You know belief has no place in science, right?
Evolution is both fact and theory, the theory describes the fact(s) about evolution.
@@jaykanta4326 There is no science that can prove this illogical claim of an ice filled asteroid hitting earth and giving us water. Evolution is a scientific impossibility that defies just about every principle of the laws of physics. One more thing, theories dont describe facts. Facts would confirm theories. If you have a fact, you dont need a theory.
Its silly to want to live in an area at risk of hurricane. I would have moved out from there to somewhere safer, rather than rebuilding it for another storm to rip it apart
Y'all funny.. you feel that way stop driving. Oh that's right you really don't care if that's the case. The climate changes duh . You want it to be sunny everyday 😂😂
Yea, if they are so concerned about the climate, maybe they should move into a cave or something.
@@roberthicks1612 right. I feel the same
Anthony Morris, yes it’s true fertilizer are process from natural gas, a lot of sulfur
but we get water naturally, it doesn’t come from fossils.
Twas a foolish man that built his house upon the sand.
Trying to move SAND to avert water often causes more damage later
You have to build your own boat..thanks for this news..
People should've never settled along any coastlines to begin with. I feel bad for the many
There is something that doesn’t add up in these reports. Over 95% of water on earth is in the oceans. About 1% is in the atmosphere and 1.7% is tied up in ice and snow. If all that melted, how on earth could it raise the sea levels as high as these people claim?
I am totally in favor of global warming. I hate the long, cold winters in Colorado where I live. So a year ago I began focusing on raising my carbon footprint. So far I have raised the average daily temperature in Colorado by 4 degrees. I will continue until I can grow palm trees in my yard.
Agreed, we could use another couple degrees of warming in mid to high latitudes. It's clear that animals thrive in warmer temperatures and we shouldn't forget that humans are a tropical species.
😂
Data proves that most of the warming is occurring in frozen uninhabitable places, during winter and at night. Seems like a positive to me.
I’m afraid global warming can not alter the day length, so your winters will always be long, and may seem even longer due to increased cloud cover. An easier solution for you migh t be to move to a lower latitude.
Should not be able to get insurance and FEMA funds for beachfront vacation property.
Oh my😢. It’s all our fault
Where is all this water coming from? If the clouds are producing more rain than the moisture they take from the earth, they are being altered…
Earth has been changing for billions of year's, you cant stop that. It's making billions of dollars off it and taking away human rights and trying to rule the world that is wrong and won't be tolerated. Young people are being used because they enjoy a good riot and are easily manipulated. (Example: There are still only 2 genders, you are a boy turned into a woman or a woman turned into a boy= 2 genders...iPod gen 1 cost $800, and walkmans that play cassette tapes cost $500) How about we go back to landlines and give up cell phones because someone said it's better?
Fort myers, Sanibel island, Daytona etc the recent hardest hit beaches haven't done any beach renourishment projects in years. Their beaches were extremely small and they had zero dunes for protection. This is what happens when you neglect your beaches. ALL OF THE BEACHES we renourished in the past few years had very little damage. Just minor erosion. Florida might want to plan a massive never seen before beach renourishment plan to include building a much higher in elevation Beach that goes out into the water atleast a few hundred feet and build massive rows of dunes for protection similar to what New Jersey and the OBX are doing. This is Florida's wake up call imho.
I'd look who specifically was deciding to ignore the beaches. Were they just those who didn't want to pay taxes or climate deniers... or both or something else.
And Americans (with our usual level of wisdom) are moving to Florida in droves
Folks, the North American continent is still rebounding from the last ice age the edges are still sinking as the center is rising.
Y'all said the same bullshit 20 years ago and guess what? These cities are still high and dry; take your meds.
Some Engineers shouldn't have ok'd some of those locations of roads and homes!
Sure, blame it on the engineers smh. Instead of blaming the engineers, why don’t you open your eyes and understand how the increased concentration of carbon dioxide, a known greenhouse gas, is warming up the planet and is causing the glaciers to melt at an increasing rate. People have been building on the coasts for thousands of years and have never experienced these problems.
@@excuseyou7198 Gee, you are cute.
Gee, your sophomoric comment is so cute. Now back to the adults talking about climate change.
@@didibolter9362 Gee, you are such an idiot.
@@excuseyou7198 I think the same of you !
mother nature said put some respect on her name. This was very interesting and it makes you think deeper about how we have little to zero control over what God put into this world concerning all forms of nature, we can try to post pone or go around but eventually Nature will win
Why is it a problem? I have an rv lot on the port tobacco river and I can’t get a boat in and out of there. I need some damn global warming. Y’all ain’t driving enough.
Actually that’s a very old port and used to be the richest place in the world from tobacco. But it filled up with silt from so much tobacco farming. It used to be a deep port and now it’s only 5 feet deep. And the silt and erosion kills the fish and ruins the bay. Your worries are not really that rational. For the ocean it’s not going to be too high or too low. It’s going to be.
Environmentally we have to put a ton of effort stopping erosion to keep see levels up. We can save a lot of energy on excavation if we don’t have to worry about that.
No. Sea level appears to be rising at a small and steady 3mm per year. It is neither acclerating or decelerating. The trend is linear. As regards NOAA tide gauge data, let's look at some examples from around the world. N.B. All sites show a linear Relative Sea Level Trend: Kanmen, China 2.40mm/yr; Sydney, Australia 0.75mm/yr; Ferandina Beach, Florida 2.20mm/yr; Los Angeles, California 1.04mm/yr; Mera, Japan 3.8mm; Cascais, Portugal 1.32mm/yr. Remember, all linear over many decades, or more than a century. No acceleration (or deceleration for that matter).
Anyway, if you prefer satellite data NOAA's trend was +3.0mm/year Global Mean Sea Level (1993-2022), again linear last time I looked (but hey, it may have accelerated in the last month).
NASA satellite data (1993-present) for Global Mean Sea Level shows a linear rise of 3.3mm per year.
All linear. No acceleration, so no relationship to the exponential increase in CO2 in the atmosphere. It's going to be decades before even your big toe is submerged.
Linearity (or close to - the data does indicate an accelerating trend, albeit a mild one, over the last couple of decades, which would agree with what is inarguably an accelerating ice melt trend) is not proof of “no relationship” with man made causes.
@@emotown1 What would you prefer?
Reporters must be science literate because sea level are normal on this side of Gulf of Mexico!
You don’t have to look too far, with war in Ukraine, the Western nations are out of grains.
Castles made of sand fall in the sea Eventually “Jimi Hendrix” 👻💀👻
We can lower oceanlevels by couple meters or about 7 feet by opening subsea-level area inlands to seas. There are many besides Qattara.
Or we can wait a few centuries and when the Milankovitch cycle ends and the water drops 100 meters.
Or, here’s a thought. We could stop driving in smoke machines, and we could switch to renewables. Why are you republicans afraid of literally any change? We have used oil since the mid 1800s, why can’t we switch?
@@nt_partlycloudy21 not scared of change as long as you don't take my money or force me to change.
@@nt_partlycloudy21 Sure and we can all ride unicorns too. We can switch WHEN science makes it possible. It is not now. Rare earth metals are just that, rare. We do not have enough of them to create a society that can be able to depend on renewables as they are now.
Republicans are not afraid of change, they are just willing to understand that the vast majority of Americans can not afford to use renewables. Democrats also know this but expect the "deploryable walmart shoppers" to just walk or take the bus and do without heating or air conditioning. Things like cars and home ownerships, according to the democrats, should be limited to the elites.
@@roberthicks1612 Actually, if more went to electric vehicles those walmart shoppers would be better off since there would be even more used gas vehicles on the market... lowering their cost. Plus, demand for gas would go down and thus the price as well.
And by the time they wear out those gas vehicles there would be tons of used electric vehicles on the market.
What would actually hurt those walmart shoppers is if we held off until the point we had to make the change ALL at once. Then yeah, they would be hurting since they would have no choice but to get a new vehicle or take the bus.
Btw, I think the "rare elements" aren't actually rare. They just were thought to be rare when they named them. That said, they do have to be dug up and extracted kind of like how we do with gold. I'm not sure if the process is more or less expensive to do than drilling for oil or fracking.
Can't we take some water and pour in space..
The climate has been changing since the dawn of time, what's new?
Coast lines move.
Build houses on sand and do not expect they will exist for ever. That is what nature does. Some areas of land are rising and some are falling. There are areas around the globe where the sea level heights are actually falling. Oslo (Denmark) since 1885, it has been dropping at a rate of 3.12 mm per year according to NOAA. By 2123 it will have dropped 31 cms. Juneau (Alaska) since 1936 has been falling at the rate of 13 mm per year according to NOAA data. By 2123 it will have dropped 1.34 metres. Quebec (Canada) has been dropping since 1910 according to NOAA data at the rate 0.16 mm per yea. In 2123 it will fall by an amazing 1.52 cms. Stockholm (Sweden) is falling at the rate of 3.77 mm per year since 1889 according to data records held by NOAA. In 2123 it will have fallen 37.79 cms. Indian Creek Island (Florida) will rise by 57. 6 cms by 2123. The Battery (New York) will rise 28.93 cms by 2123. So yes there are some places which will sea level rises by a foot. Martha's Vineyard will see a sea level rise of about 30 cms by 2123 as will Boston and Plymouth Rock. So while the east coast appears to be having sea level rises of about a foot, on the west coast Santa Barbara will have a 9 cm rise by the year 2123. There are numerous other locations which have minimal change over the next 100 years. I watched a film on Puerto Rico which showed beach erosion after a storm surge brought on by a hurricane. It was all climate change and sea levels rising. They showed a NOAA map indicating sea levels were rising. When you looked at the top of the NOAA data chart it clearly stated that sea level rise was 2mm per year. The same with these beach houses, was that they were built on sand. Now I have provided you with a few facts. Yes the sea levels will rise. In the previous inter glacials the seas were 2 metres higher. So It is quite possible that will occur again. We also know when we had the last glacial the sea levels around the world fell by 100 metres or more. This has nothing to do with the burning of fossil fuels. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is about 0.04% of all the gases. If we get some more there is a good chance we may see deserts green again. Species come and go and that includes us. There are always factors which eradicate species. It could be a virus or it could be a meteor. And, yes man may play a part.
Dice un dicho: "El francés siempre acaba pagando el vino que ha bebido".
How many years are left before we’re all swimming? 7? Or another 12?
Didn't they say Florida would be under water by 2000?
@@roberthicks1612 yet those greedy banks still giving out loans on coastal properties!! 🤣🤣
Dice un español: "El que rompe un plato se lleva los tiestos pero paga el plato".
Ask your self if the water is 1 ft in one area & 1/2 in another on the same coast and close together something is wrong with that picture. the MORE they try to fill in the more damage the do to the actual original coast WHATS been put their is ERODING not what was orginally there
Oh no rich people losing their home oh darn
When you build on sand, there are no guarantees. Should everyone be paying for it? Lost cause!
40yrs ago when I was growing up in SoCal, there would be a big Pacific storm and parts of PCH would wash out and landslides would take out homes, as Jonny Carson (oh wait he’s dead). Back then we called it weather.
Maybe stop manipulating the weather and then blaming cows and regular people, all while certain people live it up on their private jets..eating steak while they try to sell us on Bugs!
So. If sea levels are actually changing. I guess NASA's launch pad is just got the same shoreline as decades ago cause in pics from the same spot. It's the exact same shoreline how exactly.
There's even other places from further back with pics of the shore and it's the same. No change in level.... Over 50 plus years....
Are they sure some places aren't just sinking....
Bootyjiz z, why aren't you reporting on NASA's claim on more Ice at the poles debunking global warming?
"A war they hope to one day to win...", is without a doubt the dumbest damn thing I've heard today, but the day is young and I'm certain the MSM can come up with even dumber shyte as the day proceeds. What left me agape was the fellow in Pinellas who said the sea level there had risen 6" in 6 yrs., if I heard him correctly. Not to worry coastal Floridians, Our Mad King Donald opined in his Mar-a-Lago castle by the sea that "they say the ocean (we have 5 here on earth) will rise 1/8th inch in the next 200-300 yrs". That's straight from the Greatest Mind who knows more than the scientists, so, MAGATS, you know you can believe it!
This is sitire... right?
@@meamea3733 Sadly, your cryptic no-doubt thumb typed reply is impossible to reply to in English. "sitire...right"?
@@havenmist2216 It was not my comment, but that fellow in the video. Along the East Coast of the US, the sea is rising 4mm/yr., but rate is increasing and may be 5mm now, so 1"/5yrs. All of these climate collapse stats are accelerating, so rates are increasing by the day. At today's rate, sea level on the East Coast rises 1' in 60yrs., 2082. Thanks for the reply! Stress R Us
@@havenmist2216 Thanks for that little bit of cherry picked nothing. Tell it to the inundated South Sea nations, or the collapsing sea front homes on the US East Coast. The East Coast sea level rise data is easily available from reliable sources on the net, 4-5mm/yr. The massive fresh water contributions of billions of gallons of glacial melt are well known. You are obviously a corporate shill sycophant and I won't tell you in public what I really think of you. Can you guess? Stress R Us
@@havenmist2216 Your MAGAT infested mentation is obvious now. Good luck with that and enjoy the ever more energetic record setting storms and flooding on your West Coast. And, BTW, I shill for no-one, unlike your dishonest MAGAT ridden self.
Plant mangroves.
The fact that all they care about is money 😢
I'm more worried about our tyrannical gubment than mother nature.
What is a practical alternative to fossil fuel?
Nuclear is the answer.
@@emack76 Yes, that certainly is part of the answer, I think.
But what about storage of electricity to power cars and trucks? Today’s batteries are nowhere near as good as they need to be.
@@bobs3354 if we have excesses of energy being produced by nuclear power we can make synthetic fuels. No batteries needed.
@@emack76 What types of synthetic fuels? For use in internal combustion engines or some other type of engine?
By the way, thanks for giving thoughtful, reasonable answers.
@@bobs3354 yup, direct replacement and no engine modifications necessary. It’s already being done. You can get them at auto part stores in the US. It’s expensive but can be scaled up to be more reasonable in price. This isn’t a bad use for solar power either.
Stratospheric aerosol injection are flooding places?
What's geoengineering?
Lookup "operation popeye"
weatherford police chase georgia
People are finding whale bones deep in ground in Central FL we were underwater this planet has existed for longer the I can fathom to say its going to say the way it is right now is far from the truth as I'm sure we're all aware of. It's happens slowlyyy with natural events assisting in shaping of the land and everything else in the environment. It's inevitable but very interesting
Still trying to sell this quackery, No you are not creating phony taxation
La Agenda2030 y cohorte de palanganeros [EU-UE-CN-GB-AUS] deben dar por terminada la operación de ingeniería cosmética sobre el planeta Tierra: Su misión ha fracasado. El marxismo cultural ha muerto.
God give God take why. Ask him
THE DANGERS OF LIVING IN A NON FACT SOCIETY. DECLINE
At least one St. James 6-1 level not your real friend is whispering to one Tennessee Avenue woman, "you know, we prudes think it's ok for that true savior if the result of persecution would then be all your Tennessee Ave. (Monopoly) sisters even ending up on some unthinkable continuing super serious invincible difficult day of Valhalla lining the roads on crucifixes! like the natural inheritance to be coated with, if the persecution isn't enjoined, on the way down to purgatory regarding the issues it resolves.
Pay? the urge to let someone offensive to the least conflicting age concern rot, 3 eons ago.
Not one Tennessee Avenue human whispers "pay him!" to New York Avenue, regarding options, truths, or sciences. Extreme difficulties regarding persecution of people of all ages might only be encapsulated in how many farms it might be nice to respond and address safety issues, or... anything else less vastly less productively popular, or tolerable or free the way ordinary people wake up to situations, not never return from.
I really am their savior.
Rumors become simple objections and hostile rules and the same laws of terror.
More b/s.
this report is tepid, lukewarm at best.
The Overall Impact of ARCTIC ANTARCTIC GREENLAND etc Melting.. IS SO BAD,, We have no way to Reverse Course
So everyone should party or should we end it all now?
THE BIBLE IS THE NEWSPAPER OF THE FUTURE.
LUKE 21:25-28
ROARING WAVES
REVELATION 12:12
THIS IS NOT THE WRATH OF GOD
MATTHEW 24:7
EARTHQUAKES IN DIVERS PLACES
1 PETER 3:7-13
THE PROMISE OF GOD
JOHN 3:16,17
BILLY GRAHAM SAID, ONLY BELIEVE!
Your book is worthless fiction.