@@garylinyongjia2574 If you need a booster even though you're fully vaccinated, and still need to be tested even though you're fully vaccinated and boosted, and still need to wear a mask even though you're fully vaccinated, boosted and tested, and then maybe even still have to go to the hospital despite being fully vaccinated, boosted, and always wearing a mask...then it's finally time to admit to yourself that you HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY CHEATED!
Commented before hearing the end. As someone who recently dropped poker as the main professional activity, I can subscribe to everything you are saying. They say I have an 'accelerated growth' in my new field, but to me it's just all the years of poker that make me look at my new activity and say "this is like the easiest game ever, compared to what I've been doing before" That has made me not quit poker entirely, because of the value it provides + it's the best way to unwind after a full day immersed in conversations with people, training courses and all that. Bless you and your knowledge, keep rocking that beautiful self! Cheers!
How often are you deviating from GTO against your opponents? Are you adjusting somewhat in each hand dependent on what you know or can assume about your opponent?
Quite a lot. There is always something to assume :) If I don't know my opponent I already assume that he isn't a top pro and will do mistakes and I adjust vs. that.
You need to include links and more visuals for odin... all the other videos i couldn't figure out what you were saying. finally saw it in the url line!
Im not good at poker, but i am good at chess, one reason i havent ever used a poker solver is because in chess engines are a REALLY bad idea for begginers, yes they come up with the best move but its the best move if you can think several hundred million moves a second, if your a begginer at chess you will struggle to think 3 moves ahead correctly in 20 mins, i assumed poker was the same.
I’m also OK at Chess (flirting with 1500 OL) and not so great at poker. Engines are great at finding missed tactics and blunders for beginners that are not skilled at analyzing their own games.
I believe so, unless you are very good at math AND can understand concepts such as herein (at9 bb LJ v bb): where the defending range is over 30% less than 1-alpha ((75%-51%)/75%) on this type of excellent texture for the tight range, while you are OOP defending cb.
@@daniellojuas2518 that doesn't work at NL100, and below that the rake is high enough that you had better do more than overfold. What about CB strat? Lemme guess, you bet full range on most boards for 1/3 or 1/2 pot?
just keep playing the game and building experience, that is the way stuff gets burned in your memory, tacit knowledge. Solvers are good to practice, but forget about trying to memorize stuff from it, there are millions of different combinations in poker.
ty .. but w all the respect ..2:42 i think u mistaken gto with nash eq. [ nash lines / sum 0 ev lines ] .. gto is a mix of theories startin 7-8 decades ago & its a very complicated definition especially after solvers models ..
"Formulating my thoughts" I call this "guestimating". Like you said you get better feedback because there's an emotional response to the answer. (Always guys what type of hands your opponent will flip over before calling)
Although on second thought our patterns are probably way more recognisable than we feel they are so I might have to look itnto these solvers at the end of the day 1 thing is crystal clear Fedor is in a big boy house Im in a dingy flat that I dont even own lol real talk!
Fedor, if I understand correctly you expect the poker theory to continue evolving as the chess theory has evolved with the appearance of AI? Will poker theory (GTO) feature major changes or only small changes in your opinion? And I have another question concerning the softer odin that you are using. If I understand correctly the strengths of this software is that is easy to use and gives solutions in little time. Is that correct? Honestly I never heard about this GTO software before, I would love to hear from you what are the negative sides of this software. Thank you
GTO will not evolve. Our understand of GTO will improve. Imagine GTO being the "final" stage. If we reached it, there is no improvement anymore. We are still quite far away from that. Solvers are just solving "toy games", so simplified ways to approach it better.
i'm not complaining, but you should know that if you bought a nice camera and mic, and paid for some good production, you would have way more interest in your videos. Even one of the greatest tournament players ever can be hamstrung by poor quality. Big fan, tho!
The subscription to Odin is too damned expensive, even if you have money to pay for it, US$200 monthly is just a ridiculous price. There are better and way cheaper options like GTOBase.
The reason I refuse to believe that solvers work is (Really the fact Im too lazy to understand them) But Qualia as stated by the youtuber exurb1a in his video titled "there's no such thing as orange" - Add that with the element of bluffing in poker coupled with the concept of fate or are we the ones in control = humans are spontaneous and understanding poker I feel is like a mixture of becoming a lockpicking safecracker with an extremely gentle ear & touch mixed with being an artist thats why Im skeptical on how effective solvers may be, not to mention that humans are probably telepathic and thats why we make some great hero calls vrs some great lay downs who the fuck knows it'll all be revealed thousands of years from now.
Dads need to be dad's &Moms need to be mom's. Attention: The following is for well you know..if you don't keep reading... Stop. 🛑 Were made in HIS image. HE made us with the power of free choice A good prayer: I'm a sinner JESUS please forgive me for all my sins I know you shed your Blood for me on the cross at Calvary. Thank you JESUS for my salvation and for shedding they Blood for me. I love you JESUS. Romans 10:5/10 ct...❤️k JESUSisLord!Amen... Amen.. If you'd like to call someone who cares 83 For Truth. bc you don't know when you'll die? .y r u hesitant. Happy New Years 🎊🎊🎊❣️
Poker will NEVER get at the same point Chess is. Chess has no bluff, chess is and objective game, and it can be beaten. Poker can never be beaten because its subjective, too many bluffs win pots, playing wrong wins TOO MANY POTS, including against the best in the world.
@@amazingcabbage39 The long term that you are referring to is infinite years. To make a game with such numbers of odds indifferent to exploitation it must be, in practice, infinite years.
I'm sharing how I've worked with solvers and my history with them. I hope this is valuable. If you have any questions feel free to drop them below
Hello Fedor, are mobile solvers any good?
@@garylinyongjia2574 If you need a booster even though you're fully vaccinated, and still need to be tested even though you're fully vaccinated and boosted, and still need to wear a mask even though you're fully vaccinated, boosted and tested, and then maybe even still have to go to the hospital despite being fully vaccinated, boosted, and always wearing a mask...then it's finally time to admit to yourself that you HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY CHEATED!
@@AB-oe5zh ok
@@roffo not okay.
Thank you sir
Wow. Ty for sharing this Fedor. It seems I always become a bigger and bigger fan of you.
We're glad you enjoyed it!
Commented before hearing the end. As someone who recently dropped poker as the main professional activity, I can subscribe to everything you are saying. They say I have an 'accelerated growth' in my new field, but to me it's just all the years of poker that make me look at my new activity and say "this is like the easiest game ever, compared to what I've been doing before" That has made me not quit poker entirely, because of the value it provides + it's the best way to unwind after a full day immersed in conversations with people, training courses and all that.
Bless you and your knowledge, keep rocking that beautiful self! Cheers!
How often are you deviating from GTO against your opponents? Are you adjusting somewhat in each hand dependent on what you know or can assume about your opponent?
Quite a lot. There is always something to assume :) If I don't know my opponent I already assume that he isn't a top pro and will do mistakes and I adjust vs. that.
legend, and thankyou. U inspire me to be more intuitive
When is a solver for 6 card plo coming out?
2099
thanks fedor! always a huge inspiration!
You need to include links and more visuals for odin... all the other videos i couldn't figure out what you were saying. finally saw it in the url line!
Im not good at poker, but i am good at chess, one reason i havent ever used a poker solver is because in chess engines are a REALLY bad idea for begginers, yes they come up with the best move but its the best move if you can think several hundred million moves a second, if your a begginer at chess you will struggle to think 3 moves ahead correctly in 20 mins, i assumed poker was the same.
I’m also OK at Chess (flirting with 1500 OL) and not so great at poker. Engines are great at finding missed tactics and blunders for beginners that are not skilled at analyzing their own games.
Are solvers necessary to move up from the micros to NL100?
I believe so, unless you are very good at math AND can understand concepts such as herein (at9 bb LJ v bb): where the defending range is over 30% less than 1-alpha ((75%-51%)/75%) on this type of excellent texture for the tight range, while you are OOP defending cb.
Mmmmmmmmm no, so easy to exploit that levels just fold more!
@@daniellojuas2518 that doesn't work at NL100, and below that the rake is high enough that you had better do more than overfold. What about CB strat? Lemme guess, you bet full range on most boards for 1/3 or 1/2 pot?
just keep playing the game and building experience, that is the way stuff gets burned in your memory, tacit knowledge. Solvers are good to practice, but forget about trying to memorize stuff from it, there are millions of different combinations in poker.
Amazing insights! Very very much appreciate this! Thank you!
ty .. but w all the respect ..2:42 i think u mistaken gto with nash eq. [ nash lines / sum 0 ev lines ] .. gto is a mix of theories startin 7-8 decades ago & its a very complicated definition especially after solvers models ..
"Formulating my thoughts" I call this "guestimating". Like you said you get better feedback because there's an emotional response to the answer. (Always guys what type of hands your opponent will flip over before calling)
Although on second thought our patterns are probably way more recognisable than we feel they are so I might have to look itnto these solvers at the end of the day 1 thing is crystal clear Fedor is in a big boy house Im in a dingy flat that I dont even own lol real talk!
Fedor, if I understand correctly you expect the poker theory to continue evolving as the chess theory has evolved with the appearance of AI? Will poker theory (GTO) feature major changes or only small changes in your opinion?
And I have another question concerning the softer odin that you are using. If I understand correctly the strengths of this software is that is easy to use and gives solutions in little time. Is that correct? Honestly I never heard about this GTO software before, I would love to hear from you what are the negative sides of this software. Thank you
GTO will not evolve. Our understand of GTO will improve. Imagine GTO being the "final" stage. If we reached it, there is no improvement anymore. We are still quite far away from that. Solvers are just solving "toy games", so simplified ways to approach it better.
i'm not complaining, but you should know that if you bought a nice camera and mic, and paid for some good production, you would have way more interest in your videos. Even one of the greatest tournament players ever can be hamstrung by poor quality. Big fan, tho!
The subscription to Odin is too damned expensive, even if you have money to pay for it, US$200 monthly is just a ridiculous price. There are better and way cheaper options like GTOBase.
For Pokercode members, we offer an exclusive discount to help it become more affordable :).
You look like that famous poker player.
At the very least, solvers get you thinking deeply about poker.
The reason I refuse to believe that solvers work is (Really the fact Im too lazy to understand them) But Qualia as stated by the youtuber exurb1a in his video titled "there's no such thing as orange" - Add that with the element of bluffing in poker coupled with the concept of fate or are we the ones in control = humans are spontaneous and understanding poker I feel is like a mixture of becoming a lockpicking safecracker with an extremely gentle ear & touch mixed with being an artist thats why Im skeptical on how effective solvers may be, not to mention that humans are probably telepathic and thats why we make some great hero calls vrs some great lay downs who the fuck knows it'll all be revealed thousands of years from now.
this video is brought to you by Odin!
Why's Dom Nietsche against everybody these days? #bencb #rye #odin #fedor
🤷
Dads need to be dad's &Moms need to be mom's.
Attention: The following is for well you know..if you don't keep reading...
Stop. 🛑
Were made in HIS image. HE made us with the power of free choice
A good prayer:
I'm a sinner JESUS please forgive me for all my sins I know you shed your Blood for me on the cross at Calvary. Thank you JESUS for my salvation and for shedding they Blood for me. I love you JESUS.
Romans 10:5/10 ct...❤️k
JESUSisLord!Amen...
Amen..
If you'd like to call someone who cares
83
For
Truth.
bc you don't know when you'll die?
.y r u hesitant.
Happy New Years 🎊🎊🎊❣️
don't trust anyone who has "NFT" bookmarks directory....
Poker will NEVER get at the same point Chess is. Chess has no bluff, chess is and objective game, and it can be beaten. Poker can never be beaten because its subjective, too many bluffs win pots, playing wrong wins TOO MANY POTS, including against the best in the world.
Gto is the long term in which taking certain actions at certain frequencies makes you completely indifferent to exploitation
@@amazingcabbage39 The long term that you are referring to is infinite years. To make a game with such numbers of odds indifferent to exploitation it must be, in practice, infinite years.
Terrible quality vid and sound haha.. thanks for the effort tho