Thanks for watching all! Once again, this video is just a fun thought exercise. We may never know the truth of Bob Lazar' story, but one thing is certain--our own level of scientific and technological development will continue to move forward.
Have you seen my other channel on a Graphene space ship concept idea? I used the information from the other videos shown in playlists under the "created playlists" on my other channel. And my other channel can be found by going to my channel, when you get there.. click on the words "created playlists" and save that link to your browser's favorites.
And.. let Bob Lazar know about my Graphene space ships concept idea, but be sure he knows about the "created playlists" on my other channel and to watch everything starting from the bottom. Don't question it, go find out on my other channel under the "created playlists", when you start at the bottom of the created playlists, and work your way to the top playlists. Under each playlist, start with the top video, please don't cherry - pick through my other channel's "created playlists" and not through the videos in each playlist, watch everything.
Jake, here is a really old clip of Bob Lazar explaining with diagrams how they thought the 115 interacted in the reactor/generator/amplifier. I believe their understanding of how the reactor functioned was an educated guess because the reactor's interior could not be directly observed and attempted disassembly of a different reactor had already killed some people. th-cam.com/video/AheoPrqz4L0/w-d-xo.html
All technology is a progression and is bounded by the Laws of Physics. Check how we design and build "billion" transistor chips (we use in every CPU). We are now at the edge of the limit of our technology. - limited by the size of the atom. Transistors are almost reaching the limits of miniaturization at atomic levels. We are approaching the size of atoms which is a fundamental barrier (Laws of Physics) Our Periodic Table of Elements - is a list of all element in the universe, anything heavier than uranium (92) are not usually found in nature, they are radioactive and unstable (decays in seconds - and mostly not of any use) Any "alien" spaceship will be made from the elements in the PTE. And any alien being would be made of the same elements as any other living things like us. - hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, etc. they are also the most common elements in the universe. - their "blood and guts" can be the made if the same things as any other living creatures on earth. These UAP's are something else - we just do not know what. - They do not create a splash when they enter the ocean. They are not affected by anything here on earth or the universe (gravity, atmosphere, ocean, vacuum of space, etc.) We can deduce that they could be massless entities that are alive and conscious, they react defensively to navy jets and even jam their radar.
I 100% agree.. Jeremy Corbell is so full of it.. The amount of times he's constantly trying to promote his self importance, makes you want to vomit. "I discovered Bob", "I broke the story", "I released exclusive whatever".. Then constantly stating things as fact without sufficient proof. If that dude quit talking about himself and interjecting himself into all these stories that he has nothing to really to do with.. I think people would like his material ALOT better.
S4 is still area51... but even the fact that he knew that existed and differentiated it before anyone else knew, since proven to exist, adds credibility.
also people who have been proven to work there have seen him there incl pilot of the u2,also he told of 115 exists then they say...no hes full of shit....then miraculously synthesize 115 ?...coincidence or covering their ass...not 100% sure about all bob says but I belive him in a lot of it...if he was lying I think he would have said he did see aliens,but didnt....as he said,if he was going to make it up he could have said wayyyy more...
One of the most interesting stand out things to me is when he explains that it tilts to its side and is pretty much vertical once it wants to “shoot” in a certain direction. There have been a few videos out there. Like the gimble and the video shot in South America on a Motorola razer phone where the object tilts on its side and then speeds off. Bob was talking about this before those videos surfaced…
Good comment, I also like that he admitted having a hard time describing what the alien technology inside the ship looks like, saying it was so 'weird' that he couldn't find ways of defining what he was seeing. This rings true for me - when confronted with technology person a million years more advanced than ours, we would have a huge problem trying to simply figure out what we were looking at - none of it would make any sense. A faker wouldn't do this - they'd make up something based on TODAY'S technology "Yeah...there were huge computer screens all over" drivel based on things they'd seen in Hollywood movies.
I love the production on the video. I don't really see people using your style of showing us photos, quotes, and bullet points. Its like I'm watching a presentation. Thanks bud.
@@JakeBroe omicron?.... Delta?... configuration?!? Corona!!!! conspiracy much?!! hahaha weird that,thats what it's called and with the coronavirus thing... perfect!
When George Knapp said it all depends on how Bob is if the planets are align and it's a blue moon horseshit cringe AF and let's not forget creepy voice Mickey Rourke sounds like he's talking inward n not outward 😂😂
You forgot to add in on the bullet points is that 30 years ago lazar said that the thing would go up and belly up to go forward. Sort of what the navy footage should when it rotated to switch directions.
good point....aiming the 3 or how ever many drives they have at point they want to go...also several scientists have said if we developed this sytem its how we would do it too,seems the civilizations out there have discovered what does what....usually fiction becomes fact...look at dyson spkheres decent scientists believe some may actuaklly have been detected...wow ..and pentagon dmitting ufos out there...seems reality is most of the ufo "nuts" they called em are actually the sane ones..
Jake, as much as I enjoy this topic, I love the fact that you talked about it, in the easy freeflowing layperson's way that you do, and the sensible logical approach you're doing it. I've already enjoyed your Ukraine/war videos, and came to your channel for that, but now stay for knowing you've got a diverse range of subjects covered to enjoy.
I completely agree. I found this channel around 9 months ago for the videos discussing the Ukrainian/Russian war. I've been a regular viewer ever since but I also really enjoy interesting videos like this from time to time. 👍
Great video. Nice to see someone play around with these ideas instead of arguing over if it's true or not. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Instead of arguing, try playing around with ideas and see if any of it makes sense. First video I've seen in a long time that adds to the conversation instead of yelling back and forth over individual beliefs.
the universe is simply too young to have this occur anywhere else in nature. It is more plausible that quadrillions of years into the future, after 100's if not 1000's of generations of stars like our own, have lived, died, and "spilled their guts" as he says, so that heavier elements can be forged, can this be a reality. Unless we are in a "pocket" universe, where our universe is "younger" than where the aliens come from, this is simply nonsense.
I do the same with Gandalf Magic Wand. If i beleive very very very strong maybe someday.....LOL😅 Since 30 Years he live from this fairytail.....why he should stop when its soooo easy to be surrounded by gullibles.....why? He is not the Idiot in the room, so much its clear...😊 not he....
The Tik Tak “flies” like a weather balloon. The data indicates it was blown by the wind, the story from the pilot is obviously embellished after the fact because he adds details that were not available at the time. The fact that they had the capability to visually record it, and didn’t, is problematic for trusting the often retold story.
@@jeffersonian000 Scott, you come off as one of those people that, if a saucer landed on your house, and little grey men slid down your chimney, you would tell yourself they were part of Orkin spraying for termites, or Santa's little helpers, before you would ever admit the possibility that we are not alone in the universe. Open your mind bruh....
@@jeffersonian000 watch the female jet fighter pilot’s analysis on Wired (TH-cam channel). She will disagree with you regarding its speed, behaviour and pretty much everything. Eye opening short video.
@@jeffersonian000 That de-bunking depends on an analysis from a guy who's never used that equipment being better at it than trained observer fighter pilots with hundreds or thousands of hours worth of experience. Pass.
@@queenlaqueefaall-in2428 1st off, it when need to actually happen. Given that most “close encounters” can be attributed to sleep paralysis and the tendency of our brains to rewrite memories to solve problems, such as why you can’t move and it feels like someone is sitting on your chest or watching you or carrying you. And 2nd, it would actually have to happen.
Jake, thank you. I've been watching your Ukraine coverage for about 8 or 9 months, and I consider your opinion to be substanciated and therefor valuable. You back your opinion with numbers, and you explain the source of your numbers. GLORY BE !!! You give a reference to sources. Jake, referencing your sources is rare in this day and age. I thank you and sincerely appriecate you and your work, ... I sense honesty, a true rarity. John Boach
Yeah that's my biggest problem, how do we or Lazar know (if he's not lying) that the gov didn't just throw out some random element out there? Unless Lazar did a NMR spectroscopy or IR he has no clue as to what was in the fluid.
This was very interesting. When I was a kid, I had a plastic model of Bob Lazar's alien saucer craft. I was fascinated by his description of the gravity amplifier system, even if I didn't completely understand it. This presentation of yours helped me understand the idea much better. Well done!
He made zero money. Someone took his description and made those model kits without his involvement. He is a fairly high-level scientist anyways. He makes damn good money at his job.
If it does nothing else i gives kids a boost to dream of being better things down the road for there's nothing better than a great science fiction story to get the mind to open up to all possibilities?
Growing up in Las Vegas knowing Area 51 was not far was interesting. I grew up seeing George Knapp's UFO reports on the news. I'm glad he did those; it really helped destigmatize the topic. 🛸✴🤩
Assuming that Bob is telling the truth, he still wouldn't be able to add much to such a conversation. His background is in engineering more than in theoretical physics.
Gravity waves were known since the 1920's. Gravity wave detectors were built recently, but Relativity predicted they would exist 100 years ago. Bob Liezar had nothing to do with any of that. He's just repeating what his Sophomore physics prof told him.
@@AnunnakiAaron 23:23 Einstein had theorized gravitational waves way back in 1916. He says Lazar had talked about them "30 years ago" in a way that feels boastful in its supposed prescient quality. So why not try 99 years ago with Einstein's prediction, wherein the properties and behavior of the collision of two massive objects whether they are neutron stars, black holes, etc, the waveform signatures identifying what kind, mass, rotational speed as well as velocity in their reference frame, matched incredibly closely to what would eventually be observed, making the identification of what event had indeed caused the disturbance in spacetime propagating such gravitational waves matching the predicted model.
You have such a gift for teaching complicated scientific principles! This was a wonderful video to follow along as I could actually understand what you were saying. So fun to think about! Thank you 💜
Yeah this was the best explanation ive heard so far. You might actually be right man...With the Element 115, which could be used to "make" gravitational waves and it not occuring in our solar system at all. It could stop us dead in our tracks. Kinda sad when you know that with current technology, its impossible to get to the nearest stars to potentially obtain it.
A half hour of utter techno-twaddle. It's like asking a cave man about the inner workings of a cell phone. Don't know? Just make up any pseudo scientific mash up of physics.
Alien: “What?! You lost a sortie craft?! Great! Now the whole planet is gonna learn about us! We’re fucked!” Alien2: “Actually it seems the government of the location where it was lost is keeping it hidden and secret, even from themselves.” Alien: “Fuck this is a stupid species... delay our planned physical contact another 100 years.”
100 years later: Alien: "So, did you send our message to the earthlings, that we will destroy their planet if they don't change their ways?!" Alien2: "I did. They're calling it "Dubstep" and dance to it..."
Crosses unknown light years of intergalactic space, avoids relativistic collisions and hard radiation, then runs it into the dirt. Some little green guy is getting a letter in his file.
@@plexus Eric, your inability to communicate effectively illustrates your low intelligence or mental deficiencies, perhaps from substance abuse or environmental concerns. If present conditions persist - I suggest you seek help. Thankfully, there are other quality minds we can count on, for valued insight and introspection moving forward.
If my teachers spoke and demonstrated as you do, I can't help but think I would of learned whole lot better and more, I'm 51 and threw the way you explained I have gained knowledge and so I thank you .
dilligaf - there's more to teaching than speaking and demonstrating and if you didn't learn in school it was probably more your fault than your teacher's fault
What doesn't add up to me re the Jo Rogan interview: He mentioned they were only allowed to work in isolation on each element in two's, but then they all gathered while some of them took it for a 'joy ride' around the car park. Seems 'that' bit would be the most secret of all ! & How would they know how to control the thing ...
Not to mention Bob said there's no control switches, levers, gauges or buttons. He also said the only way to activate the anti gravity device is to place the sphere onto the square box. Once active it would repell your hands away so you couldn't touch it. How did they turn it off? He also stated that when in flight, it was invisible from directly underneath. Would those in charge allow their staff to stand under an alien craft in flight. I could go on and point out around another 30 or so points that point to Bob being a complete fraud.
@@robertmorris4784 exactly 💯👏. Much though I'd really love this all to be true, it just doesn't add up. I'm also sceptical of the recent Congress event. The speaker running it seems a bit of a hill Billy 'yo-ll' and I'm not sure whether Grush is out for his 15mins of fame... 🇬🇧
I am pretty sure that's not what was said. Considering he was on the crafts propulsion division it would make sense for them to need to see the reactor in operation. Also regarding the controls there has been speculation it may be an advanced form of direct control from the brain. Like neuralink but more advanced than that. As in you don't need the chip in your brain to operate it. Considering the body nervous system operates on electrical synapses it's not impossible. We just haven't got there yet. But the idea that a technology like that couldn't exist in the future isn't impossible. Just remember one thing when you research this stuff. About 20 or so years ago I can remember the idea of a touch screen device was considered science fiction. Now we have one in everyone's pocket. The idea that you could control a device with hand gestures was science fiction. Now BMW has that in cars as a gimmick. We have advanced more in the last 80 years since Roswell happened than in the last 1000 years. If what Grusch said about getting our first craft from Italy in the 1930s is correct we may even be able to attribute splitting the atom to that tech. If not it is very coincidental how quickly fiber optics, night vision, and a host of other tech advances became public shortly after Rowsell. A lot of what Bob said has come to be true. I am not going to say whether he is right or wrong but to write him off for the reasons people are listing here is silly. Especially when he was able to show these objects to other people on test nights and it's on tape that he could. No one ever said the government made sense. But when it comes to something like propulsion, it would make more sense. Let's say you took the engine and transmission out of a car and showed it to a scientist from 200 years ago. Do you think they would have any idea what it was even for by only looking at the power source of a vehicles movement? Or do you think they may need to see it operate with the suspension, wheels, driveshaft, axles, etc. To get an understanding of what the engine is even used for? In this case we are talking tech far beyond just a 200 year gap so the idea that just maybe they would think the propulsion guys witnessing how it flies might make sense to get an idea of how it operates in the field.
@@JakeBroe I believe it was stated during the podcast, that the several craft Bob Lazar allegedly witnessed, were said by the personnel to have been unearthed -- not intercepted -- and quite old (can't remember exactly, what the supposed dating was). This interestingly translates to your point about the craft pilots not being able to find the necessary fuel in our system. If the story is true, perhaps our visitors couldn't make it back on the remaining amount... and simply died here -- leaving their vessels to be covered by time. One scouting party after another, they seemingly left a decent collection for us.
Hi Jake, Great video! I do have a few observations to Mr. Lazar's story. (1) If Lazar was tasked to work on the reactor system, he would not know about "anti-gravity emitters" or other things in that spacecraft that is not related directly to the reactor. (2) Element 115 has been theorized since the early 1960s. In fact, I want to say that Carl Sagan referenced it in his television series Cosmos (1980, I think). He described it as the only element of its type which may have a stable (non-radioactive) isotope. (3) If Lazar worked at the Area 51 facility, as he claims, then he was legally sworn to secrecy. A breech of that would have been a felony. Why was he not immediately arrested? In court, the government would have simply stated that classified research on advanced defense weaponry is conducted at that facility. (4) If Lazar truly worked on extra-terrestrial craft, he would have been quickly terminated once he had started to give out this "information". He would have suffered some "accident" to silence him permanently. (5) The sort of craft Lazar describes, together with their performance properties, have been a staple of science fiction, since the late 1940s. In fact, doesn't the diagram of Lazar's UFO interior closely resemble that of the 1951 classic "As the Earth Stood Still", and also of the 1955 classic "This Island Earth", which had a reactor in the middle of the spacecraft? The exterior is very similar the spacecraft of the 1956 classic "The Forbidden Planet", down to the "three anti-gravity emitters". According to Star Trek (1966), the warp drive forms a "warp bubble in which inertia is cancelled", and they went so far to have "inertial dampeners" for the time the spacecraft is not at warp speed. (6) in reference to "reverse engineering of extraterrestrial technology". This sounds plausible, but may in fact be unlikely. Case-in-point, If you were to take your cellphone and timewarp it back to the 1950s (or even 1960s probably) it is highly unlikely that it could be reverse engineered. Why? The technology to create the individual components (or some of the materials) simply did not exist. Could some of it be reverse engineered? The LCD screen perhaps, but even that would take many years. The electronics, the digital imaging, the onboard data storage, the CPU... not a chance in any reasonable amount of time. Scientists would most certainly have scrutinized it exhaustively, but that would have been about all they could do. (7) In reference to the US Navy video: My father is a retired USAF fighter pilot (flew F-4). He said that the video is probably accurate, but he strongly believes that the audio is dubbed. Combat pilots speak little in the cockpit to begin with, and become even less talkative under stress. Also he pointed out that the Hud shows the aircraft experiencing up to 5g while the pilots were talking and that is not heard in their voices. ---------------------------- I believe that Bob Lazar is a charlatan, as his story has far too many holes in it. Do I believe in extraterrestrial life? Yes, I do. The mathematical odds, with an estimated one billion Earth type planets in this galaxy alone, certainly speak for it. Do I believe that there is a small percentage of UFOs which many in fact be of extraterrestrial origin? Yes, most certainly. Is it possible that the US Government is in possession of crashed UFOs and possibly the remains of their crews as well? Of course it is. I think it is far more likely, as a student of History, that what is happening with the UFO disclosures is a false-flag operation. It is far easier to hide cutting edge (or beyond cutting edge) technology in plain sight. How would you accomplish this: Simple: The Pentagon releases a statement basically saying that the technology witnessed does not have an Earthly origin. With that said, and a little faked "concern", they can go about testing advanced weapons and other systems openly.
1- The reactor wold be directly related to the emitters as it is their source of power. 2 - That does not mean it does not exist. 3 - Plausible, but does not eliminate the possibility of them letting him go thinking that his story wold be too unbelievable. 4 - That wold just bring confirmation to his claims. In fact, he told that attempts were made and that was what lead him into telling his story. 5 - Just becouse these concepts have appeared somewhere else in media before does not mean they are fake. In fact, the inspiration for some of them might have come from abduction accounts. 6 - They would not know if they didn't try. Just becouse they can't reverse engeneer it does not mean they would not try. 7 - That's interesting, but I'm sure your father can tell you about the endurance training they go through. I don't think that it is impossible that two pilots wold talk about the ufo they are seeing. It's not like the ufo is chasing them, they were not in a stressful situation. I will check if it is possible to have a normal conversation in 5 Gs though. Overall interesting points.
@@sahlamitos5293 My dad viewed the video several more times, and has come to the same conclusion. :) As far as attempts on Lazar's life? If the government (especially NSA / CIA / NRO) really want you dead, there is very little that you will be able to do to prevent that. Unless these agencies are so incredibly incompetent that they cannot even manage to silence a single guy. There are dozens of drugs that would create the illusion of him passing from a sudden heart attack for example.
@@AgentPepsi1 I don't think that letting only a silgle person slip would make such agencies incompetent at all. Mistakes happen. It just happens that in that case Lazar was smart enough to expose his story for protection. I'm sure many people have been taken down for the same reasons Lazar is wanted.
One of the more interesting things about how Bob explained the means of propulsion of these crafts are that these crafts uses an Anti Matter reactor using Element 115 and it basically bends space in front of it to "propel" itself forward. He said this in an interview in the late 1980s. Then a few years later (1994) a Theoretical Physicist named Miguel Alcubierre proposes a speculative warp drive Idea almost word for word of what Bob was talking about. Bending space Infront of the craft using exotic matter as a fuel source.
to be 100% fair, Alcubierre devised the equations as a fun experiment to see if he could solve the solution to the warp drive engines in the StarTrek show he was a fan of... he didn't propose a speculative warp dive idea, he sat down to find out if the math said warp engines were yay or nay.
Alcubierre also discovered that this technology was, in fact, impossible to produce as the energy necessary to bend the space-time a significant amount is higher than the energy contained in the whole universe
@perseus274 Gravity is not a "polar" force in that way, and if it did, the craft wouldn't levitate, it'd go flying towards the attractive pole, just like in magnetism.
Antimatter has positive mass, as shown recently, (in an experiment which took a LOT of people to perform, so no "its fake" nonsense,) and thus, can't be used in an Alcubierre drive.
In the recent Bob Lazar documentary, it appears that Bob Lazar has a business supplying specialized materials to other labs. Located in California. th-cam.com/video/C4jvIGGvQmo/w-d-xo.html
He ran a few brothels, got arrested for it. Sold chemicals to make fire works illegally online. Got busted for it. Now he sells prints of his UFO drawings, merch, book deals, tv shows, etc.
I've been fascinated by Lazar's story since he first called in to Art Bell's late night radio program and remain fascinated and so appreciate the layman's nuts and bolts explanation which I think is pretty good. Like you I find it an interesting exercise in thinking about how the physical universe might work rather than a rabbit hole into which I have to sink all my attention. Will look forward to exploring more of your vids. Tally ho!
I really enjoyed this thought experiment! Seeing the Navy videos somewhat settles the question of "Do these craft exist?" But then we have to ask how they work, and I can't even begin to imagine how they do what they do. Even stranger, I'm starting to think Lazar was being truthful. If that's the case, the universe is a lot weirder than we expected.
I followed Lazar in 89 and throughout the time people were dicrediting him. Then I forgot about it until they announced element 115. Now with the release of the Navy Video's, specifically the gimbel video, it shows a craft doing exactly what Lazar described in 89. He was telling the truth the entire time.
It is obvious he was telling the truth. To me, the big question now is are humans flying around in them now or is it all aliens. They have had the crafts for 70 years now. It is very possible humans could be flying around in them and the navy videos was to test how our military would deal with a vehicle like that. I actually think after watching the interviews of members in the nimitz battle group that its probably humans, at least in that situation. They said that people came on board minutes after the encounters and confiscated all the data. That leads me to believe it was planned or it would have taken much longer for someone to confiscate the data.
@@riftur7636 element 115 was predicted for the first time in 1937 when the electrons per shell preduction were mapped. Creating it and then measuring it just wasn't feasible until moscovium discovery in 2004. It might create gravity but Lazaar just used an already predicted element to back up a flimsy story.
I believe in UFO, I have my own close encounter few years ago just 200 meter away from back door, I was overwhelmed, I thought I was delusional, I called my wife and she confirmed seeing it. I memorized its size and appearance but I forgot to record the event though my phone is just 15 feet away from me. I'm a trained mechanic and I understand what I saw. I'm watching this hovering disc for about 10 second my wife watch it for 5 second before it move horizontally at low speed NE. disc size about 50 feet in diameter, 3 round pole equally placed around disc perimeter with 5 individual round light in between pointed at my direction. At first I thought it was a big drone, but this one is silent, no noise at all. It was around 6.30pm with clear sky hovering about 100 meters above a communication pillar, in shiny dark metallic body. I thought that UFO must be made from planet core metal. This metal has High resistance to electric flow yet excite DC voltage when synchronized with planet's magnetic field. We have abundant of this on the moon surface.
Bob explained in one of his interviews that there's a gravity "a" and "b" wave bound in the nucleus of that isotope of 115, and when the particle accelerator was active, it would consume the 115 by accelerating nuclei into the triangular milled/machined piece of 115, causing a decay reaction in which the 115 would decay into daughter products releasing the gravity waves that the amplifiers use. The remaining reaction products were said to be consumed by a 100% efficient thermionic generator (i.e. all radiation was converted to an electric field) - very interesting stuff.
We've made many isotopes with 115 protons, they all have a half life of less than 1 second. And the US agreed to it being named Moscovium. If the US really thought this element was so important it's strange they'd be fine with it being named after the capital of its major rival.
@@Treblaine The US would have never come out and reveal it on their own. Russia 'discovered' it and went public with it so they get to name it. If it wasn't for Bob Lazar, they'd have no idea that it could made into a stable isotope that has the ability to be modulated to discharge gravity waves. The fact that the US didn't come out with it says it all. The US leads the world in science (hard to believe sometimes).
Another brilliant, extremely well expressed, genuinely passionate and intriguing scientific clip. I do also agree personally that Bob Lazar is legit and i quite admire the way he acted.
@@MrCmon113 what (lies) has he come up with exactly? he also probably has been with plenty of scientists/physicists before just not on camera, he also doesnt want to be on camera in the first place since he is enough trouble already.
@@paulhope3401 it's not obvioua that he's lying at all bruh, as bob said, he had no idea how they managed to fly the thing, he was only there to examine the thing, now anyone with a brain understands that they clearly didn't know how it works but it doesn't mean that they can not test fly it, i mean that's the only way to do progress. for instance someone can drive a car without understanding how it works? how is this any different. there is literally more evidence of him saying the truth than him not saying the truth. your'e reasoning for why it is somehow "obvious" that he's lying is soooo pathetic jesus.
@@paulhope3401 well how tho the aliens control it? maybe thats just how it is? it doesnt have wiring why is it so hard to comprehend. they didn't know the exact star system they were only speculating, bob lazar even said that he had no idea how they got the information where they came from ? so why are u blaiming bob for it lol. again there is so much more proof that he's truthful than that he wouldnt be truthful. you make no sense what so ever.... all of this that u wrote is so irrelevant dude.
@@paulhope3401 no? Why would i believe the earth is flat? That has like absolutely nothing To do with this? Also Maybe the aliens are simply so technologically advanced that simply do not need wiring or physical controls that we would understand, thats why u dont believe Bob but cmon man you can not honestly be that ignorant that because one thing doesnt make sense To you u draw the line completely
Dear Jake. I remember that cursed 24th February when I got you in my feed for the first time. Since then your updates are part of my household's coffee routine. Watching this two years later I could state that you are friend of logic, defender of democracy and an honest, diligent guy that anyone would be glad to have as a friend.
I loved this brainstorming. This is how technology and science pushes forward. Thank you. And you are right, maybe we don’t have that element now, but since there are inter-solar objects, maybe one day we can intercept one.
Thanks Alan! I definitely think within this decade we will be able to identify, track, and intercept an object from outside our solar system and test its composition. I can't wait to see what we find!
@@JakeBroeGravity is NOT a force!! There is no pulling going on between the earth and the moon ! Gravity is simply the warping of spacetime around massive objects ✅
I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but I'm definitely not even remotely close to being the dumbest either. So I understand a lot of this type of science (not talking about element 115, but with the other elements more commonly known) and find it utterly fascinating. However every time I try to either read up on 115 or watch something about it. I either get way to much science and overload lol and end up saying: “screw this, I don't get it." However with this video, you broke it down to where it was not only listenable, but followable in a kinda fun and interesting way. Which to me, is key in learning anything new so for that I say thank you.
Sorry, no. The nuclei in normal matter are already brimming with exchange particles at near light speed and with neutrons too. Energy itself has gravitational pull, transforming between mass and energy doesn't create extra gravity, going to element 115 won't change that.
You're absolutely right. Jake frankly admits he's not a scientist, yet he's clearly got that brilliant teaching talent of understanding and then easily explaining all the complicated knowledge in a just amazingly comprehensive way. Just like prof. Alber Einstein once said to other professors: "Genius is making complex ideas simple, NOT making simple ideas complex."
@@Adam_Adamsky Same guy also said that you shouldn't make things simpler than they are. Ol' Alberts also predicted gravitational waves 100 years ago, which puts Mr. Lazard predicting them 40 years ago kinda in perspective.
@@lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881 why are you addressing your opinions to me? I'm not your censor, you can have any opinions you like, no need to send them to anyone for proofreading 🤣
Thank you Jake for making this insightful video presentation. It’s exciting to think about the possibilities that future technologies may bring us. It’s cool to see someone working into the science of ufo.
Jake, that was a masterclass in explaining complex ideas in a simplistic way. You are much closer to true than many now realize.Sometimes you clays make me so happy - thanks for that! 🙂
Reminds me of a late night diet/vitamin infomercial pitchman 🤭 . Edit: Or the odd home shopping knife dude that will include an "authentic medieval fantasy broadsword" if you call now 🤣
Oh I remember watching a documentary about Bob Lazar many years ago. I was always very skeptical of this guy though. I should clarify, after watching your video I have gain some new appreciation for his story. Love these videos!
Thanks Wolfgang! Ultimately, if Bob had proof he had Element 115 in his house at one point, then this whole debate would be over. Why he hasn't come forward with the element is really what this is all about at this point. He might be waiting to die of old age before releasing his proof because he has threatened the government that if they kill him, then his proof of 115 goes public instantly.
@@JakeBroe Good point, also I remember in one of his earlier interviews the interviewer asked him why government hasn't done anything to stop him from divulging all these supposed classified information. If the government had done anything to him that would actually vindicate his story even more. Probabilistically speaking, I think it's very unlikely that we are alone in the universe but I highly doubt that the UFOs that we are observing are extraterrestrial beings; in fact there are couple videos on TH-cam debunking the two released footage.
@@JakeBroe Because Bob Lazar is an obvious fraud. He is childishly transparent. But he illustrates the whole problem of the area of "ufology". Because the scientific community has steered well clear of it as a legitimate subject of study, the field has been left open to the fantasists, the frauds and the conspiracy theorists. Result: fringe nutbags like Bob Lazar and Jeremy Corbell emerge as the spokespeople for the whole field of study. That is an utter disaster for the credibility of ufology. Hopefully, more and more serious scientists will have the courage to investigate the phenomenon, bringing proper scientific methodology to bear on it - and eventually consigning the likes of Lazar and Corbell to the dustbin of history.
I have researched all those lines for years just out of curiosity..... I keep on open mind. Your logic is spot on. The implications- solid. Hats off brother! No way I can disagree to any part this.. Fabulous job! Keep em flowing..
Jake, correction. The Saucer does not "bump" anything out of the way. According to Lazar, this machine bends space. Therefore, since space itself is bent around the outside of the craft, nothing would hit it since the space it inhabits would curve around the outside of the gravitational field.
@@chompchompnomnom4256 as we are all armchair scientists we can only speculate. We have never created 100% efficient antimatter propulsion system so you are only speculating.....secondly.....Lazar specifically stated that the conversion is done thru a stable version of element 115 inside an exotic form of a cyclotron. There is definitely 0 ways to even speculate on that, so a disbelief in his statement holds as much value as a belief in it.
There are many obvious questions that Bob Lazar’s description brings up. For example: 1. What has antimatter got to do with element 115 and the production of gravity fields? Where does antimatter fit in and how? Where is it stored? In what form is it? Is it used in the reactor? 2. He claims that a working craft had one of the gravity emitters removed and working outside the craft on a bench. This raises 2 immediate questions: a) how was it removed, considering his description of the craft being constructed without parts or seams. Was it cut out somehow? And b) how was it powered since the reactor must still be in the craft in order for the craft to remain functional. So where was the reactor to power the emitter on the bench? And how was it connected up to the bench emitter? 3. Bob describes the propulsion as being derived from the three emitters swivelled into different configurations. But he also mentions a cardioid gravity field created around the craft by the central column. What’s the relationship between these two systems? How does the central column produce the gravity field and what is its purpose, given that the emitters seem to do everything required. 4. Bob describes a pipe that is used to connect the emitter to the ceiling and thus a creates a flexible coupling which allows the 360/180 degree movement of the emitter. He says this was working on the benched emitter but how is this flexing controlled? What is the control mechanism that allows a scientist to operate it on the bench and make it flex? In other words, how do the scientists interact both with the benched emitter - and with the craft control systems, for that matter? There are so many simple questions like this which Bob’s story raises. I would love to hear his answers.
Yes, it would be useful to ask Bob. Unfortunately Joe Rogan wasted at least 20 minutes during the interview with Bob rambling about monkeys with sticks and stoner philosophy, and Beard Guy wasn't helpful. 1) As I recall, the antimatter was not stored anywhere; it was produced by the E115 under stimulation. 2) It had already been removed when Bob saw it, and compartmentalism required that he was not informed things he did not need to know. I don't remember, were there three reactors (one for each emitter) or only one in the ship? 3) It has something to do with the waveguides that were attached to the reactor. The reactor produced electric power for the rest of the ship in addition to powering the three emitters. 4) I got the idea that you could easily bend it by hand but it was stiff to the forces in the direction of emission.
@@codetech5598 1) So that raises even more questions. What happens to the antimatter? Bob says there was absolutely no waste heat. But antimatter production would result in annihilation with massive gamma ray production from 100% mass-energy conversion. It’s also not clear where the energy to create the antimatter would come from. 2) There was one reactor and three amplifiers, one per emitter. Even if he’d not been there when it was removed, it would surely show signs of cutting if it had been removed that way. 3) The descriptions I’ve seen all sound extremely vague, as though it’s just guesswork and theorising. 4) He explains that it’s used to direct the three emitters. I doubt they’d be doing that by hand, after going down the hatch 😄 Bob also said the pipe solidified “like a weld” once it had bent itself into the required direction. Every answer prompts further questions, which is good, to get a better understanding of what Bob experienced while working there.
...Or Why he refuses to be interviewed by a physicist. Or why he gets all his physics wrong. Or why he Lied about being enrolled in MIT and Caltech. Or why he couldn't name his advisor for his program... ...Lots of basic questions. Or we could just accept that Bob Liezar is a disinformation vendor and ignore him. Real scientists are researching real UFO sightings.
@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 Did Bob ever say that he lived in Massachusetts and attended MIT? I just remember him saying he had classes from MIT which could be anything for example night school sponsored by MIT held at another location, correspondence courses by mail, etc.
@@codetech5598 He has had many version's. In his latest he said was sent to MIT for the military on a secret project (JRE podcast).. MIT has no night school for physics, certainty not for advanced courses, and internet courses didn't exist. He claimed the government wiped out his records, yet nobody at MIT ever saw him. (And his story keeps changing).
Insanely well done thought experiment. The idea that we are missing the tech, because we are missing an element that could be abundant in another solar system, is super plausible.
actually its not at all. We would be able to "see" heavier elements like element 115 in other stars with our telescopes using spectroscopy. Its nonsense that "element 115" possibly "occurs in a different part of the universe" .. It might one day exist, a quadrillion years into the future, after 100 generations of stars have been able to live and die and collapse on each other, but the universe, at 13.5 billion years of age, is simply too young to have this be a reality.
Just a short comment on 10:00 the particle accelerator: a cyclotron is a very common particle accelerator and a relatively simple one. It is around since the 1930s, with the first ones built in Paris and Berkeley. If you read about Operation Epsilon (1943-45) you will find that there have been at least two German ones (Berlin and Heidelberg), the French one in Paris and another one in St. Peterburg.
Yes, a cyclotron is a standard piece of laboratory equipment. It is especially useful for producing photons in every wavelength, through bremsstrahlung
The University of Rochester N.Y. had a cyclotron, has been dismantled, the building repurposed. The University had installed a seven million volt cyclotron in Bausch & Lomb in 1936. In 1947 a new 250 million volt cyclotron was installed in a new building on the south edge of the River Campus.
@@jeffd.8917 Why did they wipe his existence, this has been proven because there are documents with his name associating him with the school and the company that weren't destroyed
@@jeffd.8917 HAHAHA Yeah, he's lying. That's why there is an extant copy of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Newspaper with Lazar on the cover with a picture of the jet car he built. The paper describes Lazar as an Engineer. HHHMMMMMMM
@@jeffd.8917 its definitely frustrating to accept that he is telling the truth but take into consideration the fbi, cia, nsa issues of talking about the details. And even how it might be possible that scientists/engineers were hand picked and contracted under private terms of conduct. This implies that the project managers handled all the intelligence and core research while the scientists were left in unsurity. Thats what I believe. Also consider how when asking for data on a certain element at a research lab, that element is sent there to unsuspecting scientists as that is a privately funded task. Those material scientists/researchers would just be observing an element and describing it, as they always do. They wouldnt know why they are doing it and for whom (institutionally) at what insight/reason. Its just the way of the world.
@@jeffd.8917 Jeff, you obviously have not done any research regarding Bob Lazar and it being verified of his employment and employers prior to being contracted by the military to work at S7. Thankfully, other professionals like George Knapp whom has been awarded Numerous journalism awards throughout his 40+ years of reporting. Additionally, multiple ex-coworkers verified Bob’s employment at these world class scientific research and development companies and that Bob was highly skilled at his knowledge of physics. I say all of this not to imply I wholeheartedly agree with his statements because if you had actually watched documentary in addition to multiple interviews he has given over the years, he does not make definitive claims about aliens. The only thing he is and has consistently described in laymen terms, purposely mind you, is the aspect of working on back engineering the propulsion of this UFO’s or UAP’s now. In fact, despite our gov’t doing their best to scrub his credentials they have all been verified. Your lame criticism is Bob in this documentary chose to not use highly technical physics terminology is why you then state as if this is somehow hard evidence, because you are intellectually superior on physics terms to Mr. Lazar, he should be discredited. Jeff, I obviously do not know you but I can use your same logic that you applied to Mr. Lazar to draw a conclusion and apply to you. First you seem like the sort of fella that is confident in your ignorance and furthermore assume because you are so confident in your ignorance you feel compelled to share it with everyone because you assume the rest of us would appreciate if not be downright be thankful to you. I think many that may have wasted their time in reading your post as with many others on a wide range of subject matter would agree with my assessment of your comment and you with humbly asking you to save yourself the embarrassment of showcasing to all your embrace of sharing your ignorance. I’m sure many others would have like to reply to what I can only assume are a multiple of ignorant comments you made many times on social media but simply didn’t want to take the time and effort to reply. I would strongly encourage you Jeff D. to take just a bit more time before you make a comment and ask yourself if it adds anything of value, is what you are going to write well though out and based on fact or if it is just your observation which simply put is an opinion. I’m sure you are not going to like my comment and want to reply fiercely which you certainly have the right to. However, before you do I would encourage you to re-read this reply and implement sound advice I tried to provide to you. Best Wishes, Mr. Lovejoy
I'm not trying to be a pedantic jerk, but I have a couple issues: 0. Bob Lazar is not a dumb guy. In-fact, I think he's a very very intelligent guy. But that doesn't mean that he isn't lying for his own vanity/notoriety/financial gain, or nuts. None of those are mutually exclusive. Also, the claims that these UFOs aren't affected by gravity/don't have exhaust plumes/heat signatures etc. has been examined by several people, but thunderf00t's video is a good example of some of the issues that people seem to be overlooking. th-cam.com/video/VCH7BWGpl5s/w-d-xo.html 1. You can't say "sci-fi thinking" but then reference real-life science (sometimes incorrectly) and think that is a valid shield for criticism. This is what quantum mystics and woo-peddlers do. They will use science that supports whatever they are trying to sell and either ignore or try to invalidate science that doesn't. 2. You are incorrect about the transuranic elements- for example, there is naturally occurring plutonium in pitchblende. It's likely that elements above uranium existed in the solar nebula (and even on earth) originally but have decayed by the current era because their short half-lives. Read about primordial nuclides if you're interested. 3. I have never heard this binary star system theory for the formation of the earth. I've heard of the Nemesis idea, which the sun had a companion brown dwarf out beyond the Oort cloud (95,000 AU). I don't think it's crazy to think that there might have been a companion star to the sun born in the same nebula, but it's much more likely (especially since we don't see a stellar remnant in our system) that if there was a companion star, one of them was disturbed and pulled away from the binary system while still they were still in their birth cluster. 4. The heaviest elements are now thought to only form in the r-process during neutron star collisions. It looks as though supernova nucleosynthesis doesn't seem to be the primary method for creating the heavier elements as was once thought. This is mainly because the densities are so low after the star blows itself apart. This could of course change with more evidence in the future. 5. If you are creating a gravity well, you're creating an event horizon in front of your ship which will, like a black hole's event horizon, catch all matter at it's edge as you travel through space (gas molecules, micrometeoroids, etc.) and cause it to "freeze" at the horizon until you come to a stop. The "frozen" matter will then be released with all of the energy that it's collected during your travels- likely creating a giant death-beam pointed directly in front of you, wherever you come to a stop at. You're also going to get intense blue shifting of light from in front of your ship which will up shift lower frequency light into gamma rays, meaning make sure you have good eye protection and quite a bit of shielding on the front of your ship- well it doesn't really matter- you're going to get baked by high energy ionizing radiation anyways. 6. We can manufacture element 115, it's just not stable. Moscovium 290 has a half-life of only 650ms. According to what we have predicted based on the "island of stability" , it looks like even Moscovium (Mc 291) still isn't stable. Maybe there is a stable isotope at 292 or 293, but I doubt it. But I also don't think it matters- I don't see any property which was ascribed to the element happening, based on #7 below. 7. Beta decay allows a neutron and proton to convert to each other. You're just changing an up quark into a down quark or vice-versa. This process happens all of the time and I don't see why it would produce any type of gravitational radiation or why it would cause properties not shared (even just partially) by any other element.
For your point number 4, check out the possible explanation for the abundance of heavy elements in Przybylski's star.. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Przybylski%27s_Star
He is in fact lying. His science is not real physics and he was actually convicted of fraud in a brothel ownership scheme in Nevada. All in public record. He also lied about having a physics degree from a university Stanton Friedman researched and discovered he lied about attending. He is very charming and convincing but most con men have that characteristic. We don't need him. New data is emerging that actually can be explained by physics--that doesn't mean there isn't a huge wow factor because there is indeed. One being the amounts of energy necessary to achieve the many mach accelerations observed. Thousands of Giga Watts to begin.
I remember years back when I heard Lazar describe that UFO's create a Gravity well, and that they just fall into the well to propel the craft. That made so much sense for me. In 1953 my Dad had a UFO encounter in Colorado Springs at about 2 AM. Just sitting in the middle of a Country road blocking his travel. What he called three small people outside the craft. Dad came to a stop a couple hundred feet from the Craft. He described the incident for the first time to me in about 1970, Years Later when Lazar sketched out his Sport Model drawing . I realized his Sport Model was what my Dad had described that the UFO he had seen looked like. Dad joked to me that proves even Aliens have to stop along road to take a pee once in a while. Colorado Springs is in the area of the Air Force Academy and NORAD, other Military bases, also downwind of the NUKE Tests the Military did in the 50's. So the area would have been of interest to Aliens
What's interesting is Lazar's explanation, as you mentioned, implies the vehicle is constantly falling towards a gravitational center, like an object falls to earth. How much acceleration could a body handle fro extended periods of time? My guess would be 3 -4 g's. Acceleration would be limited by the ability of the ship and occupants do not get 'spagettified', like we've seen happen to objects falling into Jupiter. This would explain the very rapid acceleration.
@@j.d.waterhouse4197 Look at Lazars original sketch of the Sport Model. There is a box next to each of the three crew seats. I think Lazar refereed to the Boxes as Amplifiers. I think those three Boxes also put the crew in a gravity bubble that negates the outside acceleration of the craft the craft goes through. So I think the interior occupants do not feel any movement during flight.
@@stevehughes5403 Well, according to Lazar, the ship AND the crew are constantly 'falling' towards the direction they are moving. A gravitational force is somehow created in the direction the occupants want to move (using amounts of energy we are not capable of creating today). Thus there's no need to 'undo' gravity' in the ship -as long as the gravitational force isn't so great as to cause 'spagettization'. This is still a very great force, 3 or 4 g's would be probably safe. Think of how fast a parachutist accelerates when they jump out of an airplane. That's just 1 g. If a ship and crew were all subject to that same force, all would accelerate at the same time, the same as if you were inside a container and dropped from that plane, you would feel nothing. Inside the ship you wouldn't even know you were accelerating.
@@stevehughes5403 A ship (tic tac) that can great a "gravity well" deep enough to make it go from zero to say Mach 50 near the ocean would suck all the water up into it along with the craft.
I just watched your podcast on UFO's. Very interesting, I think Gene Roddenberry explained the matter/antimatter propulsion system used in Star Trek, 57 years ago with the discovery of Dilithium Crystals found on asteroids and mined on distance planets. That must be Element 115 in its natural state.
@@lucasoheyze4597 why do we have simple people like you that always seem to miss the point. Obviously the original posters knows its a fictional Tv show but the way the creator talked about the antimatter propulsion system is similar to how Bob Lazar described the stable form of Element 115.
Really enjoyed this presentation. Ever since I watched the Lazar interview, I've wondered what the inside of the crafts gravity would be like and whether inertia affected it's occupants. You answered that questions for me, so thanks!
Inertia would not affect someone in a craft that is gravity driven. The gravity would pull uniformly on the ship and its occupants, a bit like free falling. If something like that was possible you could accelerate at 200G, no problem.
Who says the UAP's come from our concept of space and time? They are sometimes an event in the space and time we experience. It doesn't mean they come from another star or galaxy.
This was so entertaining and interresting. I believe having this kind of thought experiments can accidentelly result in real discoverys 😊 Thanks for a fun moment!
Jake, absolutely great video. Other videos only try to discredit Lazar's story without offering much. You offer a creative perspective on the plausibility of how the science might be possible. Really enjoyed it. Question: did you ever wonder how the power generator would be turned off if the event of turning the generator on created a gravity field around it? Also, my favorite part of Lazar's story is his description of the retractable hatch inside the deck of the craft designed like a collapsing honeycomb. The simplicity and efficient design conception of the idea is so appealing and convincing. Was there a particular part of Lazar's story you found particularly compelling?
Hey Paul! Thanks for the comment. I think the most compelling part of Bob's story is just his interest in the technology. He doesn't seem to care about alien life. If he is a liar, then he is just making up a story about alien technology and NOT about extraterrestrial life. It's interesting!
@@JakeBroe well if that's his story (alien beings, spaceship) don't you think that will be the most important story in the whole history of the world? That would make it more important that the Manhattan Project of ww2 (splitting of the atom) - how come the scientific community is silent on this...they are still looking for ET with their SETI
There are no "gravity emitters", so nothing to turn off. There's still inertia in outer space with no gravity. If there wasn't, any asteroid could be stopped by any other object. Bob Lazar just doesn't understand the physics. Not a surprise, since he isn't a physicist and never went to MIT or Caltech. Gravity propulsion is Warp drive, aka wormholes in space-time by distorted spatial geometry. Spatial geometry distorts when large amounts of mass or energy is concentrated into a small area. You need large amounts of gravity to have gravity waves. And that required huge amounts of energy. Energy is related to mass by E=mc^2. So we know you need 1/10 the mass of the Sun worth of energy to bend space enough to make a bubble. That's larger than the little spaceship could possibly carry. It's a definite "No". Any UFOs would be Electro-Magnetic powered, or nuclear powered, or "other". "Gravity powered" simply doesn't work on small scales.
Lol The hatch is funny cause it was the only thing they understood how it worked. We need you to figure out how this craft works "we have no idea its like magic but we figured out how the hatch and the deck door works"
@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 Of course he's not a physicist. That's exactly why military hired him, because they hire only random uneducated bums. Also, it's a long time known fact there's nothing more to discover in physics or in any other field of science, as we already know everything. We should finally stop with all research projects and direct our efforts into building bigger shopping malls.
Thank you for a great video. Mr Lazar mentioned in one of his interviews that the basketball sized particle accelerator on board used a stable form of element 115 machined into specific slices. It was bombarded by a particle and made to transmute to element 116, which decayed instantly. This transmutation created anti-matter, which after combining with an inert gas in a controlled space in the reactor, created pure energy with no waste. Yes, this observation was in direct contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics but this is what Mr Lazar observed, according to his experience. The immense energy created by this transmutation allowed the craft to focus it and distort time and space. This was illustrated by Mr Lazar observing a candle flame placed onto the distortion and observing the candle continuing to burn… but seeing the flame flicker no more.
My father's friend once told him that the n.e.s.t team would be the ones who would escort element 115 freshly prepared at los Alamos to area S4 , ofcourse he might be lying
I have not heard Bob say that 115 was transmuted to 116. I believe he said when the 115 was bombarded it released both antimatter as well as gravitons. You are correct that the antimatter was immediately converted to energy with no heat and used as well as discharged by the ship. The gravitons were directed to the 3 wave guide emitters below deck that amplified the gravity waves and directed them. Bob took a piece of 115 home and conducted experiments on it showing, when electrically excited, it deflected light. That is the reason Bob is still being monitored because the piece of 115 he took has never been recovered and he refuses to talk about it.
@@jamesleadley7872 I’m referring to the talk he gave in 1990. Believe it or not, that video (a bad grainy version with Bob driving off in a red Corvette) has now been censored by YT. In that video Mr Lazar discusses what we knew about gravity at the time and how basically there are two types of observable gravity. Gravity A & B. You can break the hold of Gravity A briefly by jumping in the air. Gravity B is much more difficult to observe but it is basically the force that holds matter together. Again, according to this explanation, a stable version of Element 115 has a larger gravity B field due to it’s bigger size (compared to Hydrogen for ex) Now these fields are still infinitesimal but reactor allegedly had the ability to amplify this field and when this was achieved the operator had the capability to amplify it more or less as you would a volume knob. The 115 to 116 controlled transmutation part of the process was necessary for the other purpose of the reactor - energy to power the craft’s other demands. I’m not a physicist by any stretch, however I do believe that the explanation given to Mr Lazar first, and then by him after he allegedly worked on the reactor, makes a lot of sense. Thank you for a great reply. It’s so difficult to talk about these matters in a serious, organized way. Most people laugh it off as science fiction. I happen to believe what Mr Lazar is saying. His motive to make up a story like this and stick to it for 30+ years is absent.
Ok, so, the craft generates an electromagnetic field around itself. The three engines emit electromagnetic fields as well. The fields are manipulated to harmonize and vibrate in such a way that they cause spacetime to warp, like ripples in water, which is visually observed in the intense light fields sometimes observed around these craft. The generate waves of gravitational effects that separate everything inside the larger field from ordinary spacetime effects, creating its own kind of spacetime which remains somewhat relative to "normal" spacetime. No actually gravity is created, just manipulated, as gravity is a natural effect of the bending of spacetime. This places the craft and all matter within in a state of superposition cancelling out the effects of inertia partially or entirely. However, the energy of these gravitational effects can and are also harnessed, especially when the energy needs for acceleration exceeds the craft's internal power generation capabilities. The craft, amplifiers, and engines are all magnetic within. It's possible sound waves within specialized chambers are also used, but in this configuration may be unnecessary. However, I suspect that certain cavities within the engines, or the lower deck in its entirety, are the gas filled chamber where such sound waves may be used, especially considering how the engines function in this configuration. The lower chambers shape and position based on the function of the engine's would be the perfect place, size, and shape, to optimize performance for this function. The science and engineering is sound behind the description anddesign, and wouldn't actually break physics, just the common misconceptions of physics. Based on my calculations, and in comparison to the navy's recently released patent of similar technology, this ship is about 50 to 100 years outside the scope of public knowledge and capabilities. The nanotechnology and engineering in this ship is necessary for reliability in long distance travel to places where you can't get new parts or pull into a mechanics shop. From our position, it's seemingly flawless, even though it's only nearly not.
"Based on my calculations, and in comparison to the navy's recently released patent of similar technology, this ship is about 50 to 100 years outside the scope of public knowledge " The "public", as in non-scientists, don't understand physics or care to try unless they are physicists so your "50 - 100 years outside..." comment only makes any sense if you are saying its going to take 50 - 100 years for our best scientists to figure it out. Well if that's the case then how did you do "calculations" on it and come up with that lengthy Star-Trek like explanation? If Lazar and his team of equally well known "geniuses" of modern physics claim they couldn't figure out how it worked then I guess your lengthy explanation above is pure bullshit (along with Lazar's own reams of techno bullshit) unless you were there and participated in a more successful attempt, right? BTW, you forgot the part where element 115 is fed through the "flux capacitor" to do the space warping.
@@georgesmith4639 neither one of you know what the f your talking about, but it was cute watching you both regurgitate things you’ve heard and play pretend Physicists.
When can i get my turn in the sports model 👽🛸 . What you say is 🤔 partly right . Best not to think of the physics behind this craft apart from it's not ours. I know Bob Lazar is legit for many reasons . Most fascinating thing to me is that the craft was discovered in an archeological dig 😲 . Now imagine coming across this craft . Doesn't behave like a beamship going from solid matter to fine matter to travel faster than light
Lazar has explained that the "Cyclotron" like device in the craft's power source reactor accelerates Protons which are used to bombard the Element 115 "fuel" similarly to known Fission nuclear reactions where Neutrons bombard atoms, in particular heavy elements such as Uranium to make them split releasing energy.
Anti hydrogen is created by anti proton striking E115 (after some kind of mass reduction of a slightly heavier element) My guess? Hyper static electro field charge generator. Look at me sounding as if I could actually build this sh......t
Problem is moscovium is highly radioactive and bombarding any highly radioactive heavy metal with protons or neutrons is only going to make it a lot more radioactive and with they way he explained it you would require heavy dense metals like lead or tungsten for shielding. Have you seen the shielding around the Large Hadron Collider which is a huge cyclotron just stretched out across 2 different countries boarders or even a submarine nuclear reactor (not a cyclotron but highly radioactive) with the tons and tons of tungsten and lead shielding plus water for shielding and cooling. I’m not so sure if I believe him but if it was true then what they had was not moscovium aka element 115 and I think they called it element 115 because they didn’t know what it was because 115 was undiscovered back then so to add to its mystique they just named it element 115. If it is real and they do have this fuel then it’s probably an artificially made material as I think aliens that advanced would not be mining for a fuel source wether if it is found in their part of the galaxy or not plus moscovium has a half life of a few milliseconds and all projected isotopes have a short half life of milliseconds so they probably is not a stable isotope that they could mine not that they would mine anything with their hyper advanced intellect and technology. Plus how would Lazar know that it was mined ? Has he spoke to an alien did they tell him this ? He said he had not met the crafts makers 🤔
@@jamesstephenson2644 I don't remember Lazar stating Anti Protons bombarded the 115 to precipitate some kind of proton induced fission of the element 115, he has stated once a proton bombards the element 115 an "A wave" emission occurs along with an emission of other radiation including I believe an Anti Proton which is annihilated with possibly atmospheric gas then utilizing the resulting energy being induced into essentially, as Lazar describes, what appears to be a 100% efficient thermionic generator.
Lazar is a lying fool, as Element 115, called Moscovium, was synthesized in 2003. It's most stable isotope has a half life of 0.63 seconds. See, con man Lazar used element 115 in his lies, because it wasn't yet made, and was TOO DUMB to know all physicists predicted a tiny half life, rendering unusable for "fuel". Hence, humans don't use it. Bob is full of BS, and ignorance of science.
@@kennethc2466 my point exactly as I mentioned above. He also tripped him self up when he said they mined it because it was stable where they are from but also said that he had never met the crafts inhabitants so how did he know it was mined ?, presumably they would have to tell him this. His story is so full of holes it wouldn’t hold water. What would a hyper intelligent entity be doing mining lmao, he also never produced his PHD certificate on many occasions when asked to. If this secret was real and he divulged it then it’s tantamount to treason because anyone that has a lawful security clearance has it for life even when they retire like Luis Elazondo so they can divulge nothing and have to take all of the secrets to the grave……
What I found interesting the most is that everything that Bob Lazar mentioned 30 years ago (which sounded ridiculous or improbable back then) has been discovered since the , element 115, gravitational waves and so on... Definitely adds credibility in my eyes.
@@craigmcguire6573I didn't really believe lazars story for the first few years after joes podcast came out. But seeing the craft fly belly first is hard to predict. And people say " We already knew they fly belly first" You can't find 1 single article claiming that before 1989. It literally doesn't exist
@@mattk8810I think he claimed to only work their for 6 months. And likely if there is truth to it, it’s far beyond our understanding and we only know limited info about the craft. I could imagine how primitive our technology is to a civilization far older than ours. I don’t know if bob is lying but I do believe we’re not alone in the universe.
This was kinda profound. Thought provoking for sure, and you explain your concepts well. Glad I came across this video. It's like it's scraping at the outside of a large discovery.
Bob described 115 as the fuel, it was under a hemisphere of metal and a flat thick plate that it all set on top of. 115 was a cone shape. I picture the 115 cone shape releasing particles outward but this hemisphere of material directs it either back to the cone, or down to the thick plate of material.
@perseus274 It doesn't need to be irradiated to decay, it does that on its own. It has a half-life of less than a second. Try storing that in a fuel tank or whatever.
hi Jake I'v seen many of your videos, but this was the most interesting yet. I hope to see more like this one. Someone said we are at the stage with quantum physics where Newton was when the apple fell on his head. thank you
I remember a story that he moved his company out of the southwest and the feds raided his new company location not long after….they must think he chipped off a small piece of 115 …or they’re trying to prove a point. Honestly the guy comes off as being an honest person and his story hasn’t changed a bit since he first told it, rather as time progresses its proven to be true at every turn.
The raid was related to an investigation into the death of someone who ordered a chemical from his store. It had nothing to do with his made-up story. He was convicted of a felony for selling illegal substances.
You are an amazingly good presenter and it is awesome to see yo break out into scientific topics. Well done. However, I did nearly fall off my chair laughing at you calling Gd gold instead of Gadolinium. Understandable under the pressure of presenting, but still a funny blooper.
Nicely presented about an incredibly important controversy: if Lazar is legit, every existential construct is suspect; if he is a fraud, why the Area 51 anomalies, and why are there millions of followers. It’s hard to envision where there might be a middle ground.
Very true: confirmation of alien existence would be a wow moment but in the long term the interesting subject is the technological influence and impact.
I don't think aliens or other unknown earth based intelligences would share their knowledge with us at all. We wouldn't have anything to benefit them in return.
This came up on my feed, a vid you did a year ago.😆i totally enjoyed this trip inside your mind, thoroughly enjoyed some science thrown in there as well. As a Rock Dr you answered some of my queries concerning EVERYTHING you touched on. Please consider doing more of these (fun thought) vids. I really enjoy your vids concerning the Disastress War in Ukraine too,😢 much appreciated. Slava 🇺🇦 .
The strong force is another version of gravity, holding protons close together. Having a large enough amount of protons produces a strong force large enough that it exists outside of the atom that you can access it and amplify. Element 115 has this needed amount of protons for this to happen, or so the theory goes by Bob Lazar. Hope that helps.
@@machinesandthings7121 No such thing Gravity A or B wave.Bob Lazar a pure fantasy liar well proven by many credited scientist and engineer like myself.Dr David Morgan summed lazar up in his well detailed data about him.Fantasy liar and deception artist who knows nothing about advanced physics especially thermo dynamics and fluid dynamics.A must for advanced physics engineers and scientist.Bob Lazar neither any of these.
There have been some advancements in technology that make me think it is not impossible what he is claiming. There are some new metal alloys that we produce today that are only possible after we started working in vacuum conditions. We call them super alloys. The first problem is to understand how the element 115 has produced and if it wasn't stable, maybe they need to be produced in a specific condition to be stable. Or perhaps they need to be grouped or aligned in a specific way to stabilize. If Bob was really hired to work on the project S4 (which there is a lot of people trying to validate his educational background and other information) he did not have all the information about what he was trying to reverse-engineer. And reverse-engineering something doesn't give you all the details of how something works. It gives you an idea based on the observation of the object and the phenomena that it creates. Going back to super alloys, if we get a part made by a super alloy and in some way we travel back in time 100 years. Then we give this part to a scientist of that time, when they probably only know about the materials of the periodic table of their time. Do they be able to analyze the part and explain how it was made? Most likely they will say that this super alloy is impossible to exist or synthesize. So, it is difficult to explain something that we do not have the technology to reproduce.
That should be common sense? Also Bob is a fraud should also be common sense but we live in the age of easily accessible disinformation and scam artists.
Adding some thoughts to your thought exercise and more questions (1 year later): 8:08. No wires: We can make "chips" and "electronic plates" part of the structural frame. It apparently seems to have no wire because all wiring is "in-bedded" in the structure + the wireless devices you already commented. 13:52. Recent discovery (WEBB telescope) may suggest that there were galaxies much earlier than theory predicted. What would (all in the conditional, obviously) that mean: 1. Maybe the universe is older? 2. Maybe 90% of the "unknown universe" (dark matter/energy) - influenced by gravity but doesn't bounce EMW (photons) - has some effect on what we observed so far and made the theory of a 13.77 billion y.o universe, maybe a "little older"? 3. Could Mc115 (stable version?) be a sub-product of "dark matter"? 4. If the universe expand at faster than light "celerity" (it's possible because it can expand at a little bit more than 1/2.c then the combined expansion is faster than light) therefore there may exist an "invisible universe" (the part beyond the faster than light speed). I'm not sure if I'm clear enough... 17:56. Next time Mc115 is synthesized we have very little time to find out what is its spectroscopy signature (given it's not a "dark matter" sub-product... In that case, no spectroscopy possible, from what I understand), then try to find where MC115 is in enough quantity at the surface of a star or a planet. If it's in the Zeta Reticulae area, that would make some sense...! 19.01. I was told (according to A.Einstein) that gravity is not a force, but a "deformation" of the universe "fabric" (as a consequence of variations in density and/or speed), therefore we cannot count it as the 4th force (may the 4th be with you!) 21.29: I was told (S. Hawkings) that nothing can escape a black hole EXCEPT Information. Am I correct in my understanding? 26:49. It has been theorized that it could exist a particle responsible for mass (aka "gravitron"?), what if the stable MC115 would be "made" of more "gravitron" than other element (able to create a gravitational field)? 28:59. We have the ability to synthesize MC115 (unstable version). So, maybe, some day can we synthesize a stable version? Nothing is really impossible (from the observer PoV... ;) )
I am not a scientist but I spent 30 years working at a major research university. I worked with dozens of scientist as a technical resource in time of need. I know how they think and talk. I have heard nothing out of Mr Lazar's mouth that indicates he has any real knowledge beyond common everyday bits and pieces found in basic physics text books and UFO magazines. In my opinion, Mr Lazar's only real interest lays in pocketing money from media sources.
I spoke with Bob Lazar briefly 25 or so years ago buying an item from his company United Nuclear. Then I mentioned his UFO reports of 1989... He was adamant in that he did not want to talk about it. I either accept what he said as truth or not. He was not goting to talk about. As for him making money over it. NO WAY ! if anything it took money making ability from him. Now these videos put out of a disk craft that turns sideways. Look carefully at the haze around it. You can see three distortions in that haze. If anything this one video confirms what Bob Lazar claimed in 1989... A craft without wings, that leaves no exhaust, and a craft that apparently distorts gravity and travels at speeds unachievable by humanity. If so we are seeing that Bob Lazar was right and his story told in 1989, a story that has not changed since... Confirmed by these images taken by our military aircraft and leaked to the public.
Actually bob Lazar hasn't made any money from his story, in fact he has lost money when he lost his job, he's a real scientist and makes rocket cars and is a very smart man.
Lazar did take a lie detector test 30 years ago and passed. The polygrapher Terry Tavernetti said he thinks Bob Lazar was being truthful. Also the Joe rogan interview is 30 years after the events Lazar claimed happened, how much detail do you remember of anything from 30 years ago?
Exactly my thought. The passengers are subject to the gravity produced by the craft. It's not affected by inertia from an "external" gravity. The craft can move faster than the speed of light and the passengers won't feel a thing. If humans do get to discover how to make this technology happen, space travel will become reality. Maybe our solar system (unfortunately) didn't give us this element needed for that technology..
Are you sure? If one can bend the fabric of space/time, is it not possible to tear it open to reveal another dimension on the other side? Doesn't seem impossible to me, but what do I know?
We (the public) don't know much about the phenomena, so it's hard to say. Personally, I'm hoping they are from other star systems, because the universe is awfully huge and I'd love for humans to be able to explore it one day.
@@quantumac Absolutely. It's almost terrifying how large our universe is. The idea that there might be multiple (if not unlimited) universes just on the other side of the door is mind melting. I'm just hoping that we get some disclosure before I die. I doubt it will happen with the current state of humanity but one can hope.
A nice thought “experiment” but a mention of the “Island of Stability” should also be inserted here: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability Btw, we could have stable version(s) around but in such minute quantities that it is very hard to detect, especially since we we don’t really know it’s detectable properties.
Saw you're post today on UFO's and went back to watch what I missed before I found you. Interesting but I will reserve judgement till I see it! Keep up the good work, interesting
Thank you for saying you didn't like the documentary! The creepy weird music and silly narration and transitions irritated me, but all the comments on the video were fanboys gushing about it 🙄. It's nice to see brutal honesty!❤
Totally agree. Jeremy Corbin ruins the believability of anything he touches. That guy wants to believe soooo hard, he’s not objective. But Bob Lazar is 1000% telling the truth.
Thanks for watching all! Once again, this video is just a fun thought exercise. We may never know the truth of Bob Lazar' story, but one thing is certain--our own level of scientific and technological development will continue to move forward.
Have you seen my other channel on a Graphene space ship concept idea? I used the information from the other videos shown in playlists under the "created playlists" on my other channel.
And my other channel can be found by going to my channel, when you get there.. click on the words "created playlists" and save that link to your browser's favorites.
And.. let Bob Lazar know about my Graphene space ships concept idea, but be sure he knows about the "created playlists" on my other channel and to watch everything starting from the bottom.
Don't question it, go find out on my other channel under the "created playlists", when you start at the bottom of the created playlists, and work your way to the top playlists.
Under each playlist, start with the top video, please don't cherry - pick through my other channel's "created playlists" and not through the videos in each playlist, watch everything.
Jake, here is a really old clip of Bob Lazar explaining with diagrams how they thought the 115 interacted in the reactor/generator/amplifier. I believe their understanding of how the reactor functioned was an educated guess because the reactor's interior could not be directly observed and attempted disassembly of a different reactor had already killed some people. th-cam.com/video/AheoPrqz4L0/w-d-xo.html
All technology is a progression and is bounded by the Laws of Physics.
Check how we design and build "billion" transistor chips (we use in every CPU). We are now at the edge of the limit of our technology. - limited by the size of the atom. Transistors are almost reaching the limits of miniaturization at atomic levels. We are approaching the size of atoms which is a fundamental barrier (Laws of Physics)
Our Periodic Table of Elements - is a list of all element in the universe, anything heavier than uranium (92) are not usually found in nature, they are radioactive and unstable (decays in seconds - and mostly not of any use)
Any "alien" spaceship will be made from the elements in the PTE. And any alien being would be made of the same elements as any other living things like us. - hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, etc. they are also the most common elements in the universe. - their "blood and guts" can be the made if the same things as any other living creatures on earth.
These UAP's are something else - we just do not know what. - They do not create a splash when they enter the ocean. They are not affected by anything here on earth or the universe (gravity, atmosphere, ocean, vacuum of space, etc.)
We can deduce that they could be massless entities that are alive and conscious, they react defensively to navy jets and even jam their radar.
Check out studies of diamagnetic levitation, interesting stuff.
The intro killed me "DOES THIS SCIENTIFICALLY MAKE SENSE?, now I'm not a scientist"
🤣🤣
And it becomes very clear throughout these 30 minutes that he's definitely not a scientist.
Przybylski's Star has elements that exist above Uranium
Or a You Tuber !@@brinta2868
The big bang made planets do this I was there' loll
When we think everything is Impossible nothing will be invented.
Deep.
Nicholas. I like that. 👍
Is it just me or does everyone that tries to prove his statements wrong ignore half of the statements in order to prove that he is wrong
@@dominikcapuano9900 just you
Well not quite, physics will always be physics.
Joe’s podcast was way better than the woowoo documentary.
@@thomaslatth665 that's so woowoo
@@mrdan5943 for closed minded fools
Corbellend is a fraud.
I 100% agree.. Jeremy Corbell is so full of it.. The amount of times he's constantly trying to promote his self importance, makes you want to vomit. "I discovered Bob", "I broke the story", "I released exclusive whatever".. Then constantly stating things as fact without sufficient proof. If that dude quit talking about himself and interjecting himself into all these stories that he has nothing to really to do with.. I think people would like his material ALOT better.
This is bullying leave JC alone
He actually claimed he worked in S4. Not Area 51. 15 miles away
Which goes in the Plus column towards his credibility
It's compartmentalized. S4 is section 4, area 51.
S4 is still area51... but even the fact that he knew that existed and differentiated it before anyone else knew, since proven to exist, adds credibility.
@@foff-666lets not forget they denied him working there but the paperwork said he was🥸
also people who have been proven to work there have seen him there incl pilot of the u2,also he told of 115 exists then they say...no hes full of shit....then miraculously synthesize 115 ?...coincidence or covering their ass...not 100% sure about all bob says but I belive him in a lot of it...if he was lying I think he would have said he did see aliens,but didnt....as he said,if he was going to make it up he could have said wayyyy more...
One of the most interesting stand out things to me is when he explains that it tilts to its side and is pretty much vertical once it wants to “shoot” in a certain direction. There have been a few videos out there. Like the gimble and the video shot in South America on a Motorola razer phone where the object tilts on its side and then speeds off. Bob was talking about this before those videos surfaced…
Good comment, I also like that he admitted having a hard time describing what the alien technology inside the ship looks like, saying it was so 'weird' that he couldn't find ways of defining what he was seeing. This rings true for me - when confronted with technology person a million years more advanced than ours, we would have a huge problem trying to simply figure out what we were looking at - none of it would make any sense. A faker wouldn't do this - they'd make up something based on TODAY'S technology "Yeah...there were huge computer screens all over" drivel based on things they'd seen in Hollywood movies.
gimbal video has been debunked, motorola video is obviously fake
@@t4404 the tic tac video showed them spinning.
@@FlydreamMedia thanks for your completely useless comment👍
@@t4404gimble hasn't been debunked what's your source on that
I love the production on the video. I don't really see people using your style of showing us photos, quotes, and bullet points. Its like I'm watching a presentation. Thanks bud.
Thanks Duval! I keep it simple and informative on my channel!
@@JakeBroe omicron?.... Delta?... configuration?!? Corona!!!! conspiracy much?!! hahaha weird that,thats what it's called and with the coronavirus thing... perfect!
@@atomthegreat541 I have absolutely no idea what you’re trying to say
Edit: I got to that portion of the video, now I get it lol
@@Me-kt3gh Hahaha..Word!
@@atomthegreat541 woooooooord!!!
Facts! These stupid "documentaries" add weird music, stupid transitions and effects makes Bob Lazar stories look crazy.
Make a proper documentary.
When George Knapp said it all depends on how Bob is if the planets are align and it's a blue moon horseshit cringe AF and let's not forget creepy voice Mickey Rourke sounds like he's talking inward n not outward 😂😂
You forgot to add in on the bullet points is that 30 years ago lazar said that the thing would go up and belly up to go forward. Sort of what the navy footage should when it rotated to switch directions.
"should"????
What the navy *showed (not "should").
Also the recent footage of ufo’s shows this as accurate
There's photos of UFO's doing this in the 60's so it was nothing new. Lazar made up his tall tale.
good point....aiming the 3 or how ever many drives they have at point they want to go...also several scientists have said if we developed this sytem its how we would do it too,seems the civilizations out there have discovered what does what....usually fiction becomes fact...look at dyson spkheres decent scientists believe some may actuaklly have been detected...wow ..and pentagon dmitting ufos out there...seems reality is most of the ufo "nuts" they called em are actually the sane ones..
Jake, as much as I enjoy this topic, I love the fact that you talked about it, in the easy freeflowing layperson's way that you do, and the sensible logical approach you're doing it. I've already enjoyed your Ukraine/war videos, and came to your channel for that, but now stay for knowing you've got a diverse range of subjects covered to enjoy.
I completely agree. I found this channel around 9 months ago for the videos discussing the Ukrainian/Russian war. I've been a regular viewer ever since but I also really enjoy interesting videos like this from time to time. 👍
I would tell Einstein to quit stealing Henri Poincare's work on C2. Plagiarizing and lying is not cool Einstein.
@@magnitudematrix2653 The old man's dead leave him alone.
Great video. Nice to see someone play around with these ideas instead of arguing over if it's true or not. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Instead of arguing, try playing around with ideas and see if any of it makes sense. First video I've seen in a long time that adds to the conversation instead of yelling back and forth over individual beliefs.
Thanks Mrbig! Could be real, could be pure science fiction! Still fun to consider and think about!
the universe is simply too young to have this occur anywhere else in nature. It is more plausible that quadrillions of years into the future, after 100's if not 1000's of generations of stars like our own, have lived, died, and "spilled their guts" as he says, so that heavier elements can be forged, can this be a reality. Unless we are in a "pocket" universe, where our universe is "younger" than where the aliens come from, this is simply nonsense.
I do the same with Gandalf Magic Wand. If i beleive very very very strong maybe someday.....LOL😅
Since 30 Years he live from this fairytail.....why he should stop when its soooo easy to be surrounded by gullibles.....why?
He is not the Idiot in the room, so much its clear...😊 not he....
Imagine if we met aliens and they were still using dial up modem.
The tick tack flies just like Lazar said they flew. Bobs rendition becomes more likely every passing year.
The Tik Tak “flies” like a weather balloon. The data indicates it was blown by the wind, the story from the pilot is obviously embellished after the fact because he adds details that were not available at the time. The fact that they had the capability to visually record it, and didn’t, is problematic for trusting the often retold story.
@@jeffersonian000 Scott, you come off as one of those people that, if a saucer landed on your house, and little grey men slid down your chimney, you would tell yourself they were part of Orkin spraying for termites, or Santa's little helpers, before you would ever admit the possibility that we are not alone in the universe. Open your mind bruh....
@@jeffersonian000 watch the female jet fighter pilot’s analysis on Wired (TH-cam channel). She will disagree with you regarding its speed, behaviour and pretty much everything. Eye opening short video.
@@jeffersonian000 That de-bunking depends on an analysis from a guy who's never used that equipment being better at it than trained observer fighter pilots with hundreds or thousands of hours worth of experience. Pass.
@@queenlaqueefaall-in2428
1st off, it when need to actually happen. Given that most “close encounters” can be attributed to sleep paralysis and the tendency of our brains to rewrite memories to solve problems, such as why you can’t move and it feels like someone is sitting on your chest or watching you or carrying you.
And 2nd, it would actually have to happen.
Jake, thank you. I've been watching your Ukraine coverage for about 8 or 9 months, and I consider your opinion to be substanciated and therefor valuable.
You back your opinion with numbers, and you explain the source of your numbers. GLORY BE !!! You give a reference to sources.
Jake, referencing your sources is rare in this day and age. I thank you and sincerely appriecate you and your work, ... I sense honesty, a true rarity.
John Boach
His financial stuff is good too. 👍
Ive been abducted by aliens and i need help
@@kmlumd44 how?
@@kmlumd44You ok buddy? What happened?
I wish someone would ask Lazar what instruments he used to determine that the material had 115 protons.
Yes, it's call a bulls!#+ meter.
I wish Lazar was ever in the same room with an actual engineer or physicist.
Who knows what they use?? People need to understand alien thinking not human thinking. We have no idea. What capabilities they are able of.
Yeah that's my biggest problem, how do we or Lazar know (if he's not lying) that the gov didn't just throw out some random element out there? Unless Lazar did a NMR spectroscopy or IR he has no clue as to what was in the fluid.
It's called X-ray fluorescence and was invented in 1928
That's a fun sketch of the Jupiter II that Lazar drew. Must be a fan of the 1960s Lost In Space show from CBS.
This was very interesting. When I was a kid, I had a plastic model of Bob Lazar's alien saucer craft. I was fascinated by his description of the gravity amplifier system, even if I didn't completely understand it. This presentation of yours helped me understand the idea much better. Well done!
Yes but he claims he made no money ! Oh but testers can make his model give me a break
He made zero money. Someone took his description and made those model kits without his involvement. He is a fairly high-level scientist anyways. He makes damn good money at his job.
If it does nothing else i gives kids a boost to dream of being better things down the road for there's nothing better than a great science fiction story to get the mind to open up to all possibilities?
Growing up in Las Vegas knowing Area 51 was not far was interesting. I grew up seeing George Knapp's UFO reports on the news. I'm glad he did those; it really helped destigmatize the topic. 🛸✴🤩
🛸
Area 51 is boring
I’d love to see you and Bob have a discussion on this. I think it would be fascinating.
Why not. Would certainly be a change of pace.
Assuming that Bob is telling the truth, he still wouldn't be able to add much to such a conversation. His background is in engineering more than in theoretical physics.
@@brianm2881 Killjoy...
Rogan interview bob a while back. It’s a great interview.
@@brianm2881 he actually had a conversation with a physicist on artbell radio back in 1990s bob lazar definitely knows a lot about physics
Gravity waves were known since the 1920's. Gravity wave detectors were built recently, but Relativity predicted they would exist 100 years ago. Bob Liezar had nothing to do with any of that. He's just repeating what his Sophomore physics prof told him.
He never said he had anything to do with it re: gravity. What are you talking about?
@@AnunnakiAaron 23:23 Einstein had theorized gravitational waves way back in 1916.
He says Lazar had talked about them "30 years ago" in a way that feels boastful in its supposed prescient quality. So why not try 99 years ago with Einstein's prediction, wherein the properties and behavior of the collision of two massive objects whether they are neutron stars, black holes, etc, the waveform signatures identifying what kind, mass, rotational speed as well as velocity in their reference frame, matched incredibly closely to what would eventually be observed, making the identification of what event had indeed caused the disturbance in spacetime propagating such gravitational waves matching the predicted model.
You have such a gift for teaching complicated scientific principles! This was a wonderful video to follow along as I could actually understand what you were saying. So fun to think about! Thank you 💜
Yeah this was the best explanation ive heard so far. You might actually be right man...With the Element 115, which could be used to "make" gravitational waves and it not occuring in our solar system at all. It could stop us dead in our tracks. Kinda sad when you know that with current technology, its impossible to get to the nearest stars to potentially obtain it.
This is one of the best videos and explanations on Bob Lazar's Element 115 I've seen yet. Thank you. Would love to see more.
I have more planned after the Congressional report comes out on June 25!
@@JakeBroe I'll be looking forward to it!
One of the saucers was actually from an archaeological dig, according to Lazar.
imagine aliens crossing vast interstellar distances in incomprehensible tech, but they crash into earth
@@numbersix9468Imagine people driving vast distances at speeds unimaginable to animals, only to crash on an empty highway. Sh!t happens.
A non-physicist discussing pseudo-physics of another non-physicist. All nonsense.
A half hour of utter techno-twaddle.
It's like asking a cave man about the inner workings of a cell phone.
Don't know? Just make up any pseudo scientific mash up of physics.
Alien: “What?! You lost a sortie craft?! Great! Now the whole planet is gonna learn about us! We’re fucked!”
Alien2: “Actually it seems the government of the location where it was lost is keeping it hidden and secret, even from themselves.”
Alien: “Fuck this is a stupid species... delay our planned physical contact another 100 years.”
Would have been a lot funnier - without the vulgarity.
100 years later:
Alien: "So, did you send our message to the earthlings, that we will destroy their planet if they don't change their ways?!"
Alien2: "I did. They're calling it "Dubstep" and dance to it..."
@@bc-guy852 or it's funny regardless.
Crosses unknown light years of intergalactic space, avoids relativistic collisions and hard radiation, then runs it into the dirt. Some little green guy is getting a letter in his file.
@@plexus Eric, your inability to communicate effectively illustrates your low intelligence or mental deficiencies, perhaps from substance abuse or environmental concerns. If present conditions persist - I suggest you seek help. Thankfully, there are other quality minds we can count on, for valued insight and introspection moving forward.
If my teachers spoke and demonstrated as you do, I can't help but think I would of learned whole lot better and more, I'm 51 and threw the way you explained I have gained knowledge and so I thank you .
Well sed...
Now save the world...
@notaclue.663- Your teachers must have been shite.
"...would of..." = would have
"...threw..." = through
Definitely not a clue...
@@davidearea242 Tbat
would have not would of, through not threw. None of this was your teachers' fault.
dilligaf - there's more to teaching than speaking and demonstrating and if you didn't learn in school it was probably more your fault than your teacher's fault
What doesn't add up to me re the Jo Rogan interview: He mentioned they were only allowed to work in isolation on each element in two's, but then they all gathered while some of them took it for a 'joy ride' around the car park. Seems 'that' bit would be the most secret of all ! & How would they know how to control the thing ...
Not to mention Bob said there's no control switches, levers, gauges or buttons. He also said the only way to activate the anti gravity device is to place the sphere onto the square box. Once active it would repell your hands away so you couldn't touch it. How did they turn it off? He also stated that when in flight, it was invisible from directly underneath. Would those in charge allow their staff to stand under an alien craft in flight. I could go on and point out around another 30 or so points that point to Bob being a complete fraud.
@@robertmorris4784 exactly 💯👏. Much though I'd really love this all to be true, it just doesn't add up. I'm also sceptical of the recent Congress event. The speaker running it seems a bit of a hill Billy 'yo-ll' and I'm not sure whether Grush is out for his 15mins of fame... 🇬🇧
@@doverivermedia3937 Yeah, what a pantomime
I am pretty sure that's not what was said. Considering he was on the crafts propulsion division it would make sense for them to need to see the reactor in operation. Also regarding the controls there has been speculation it may be an advanced form of direct control from the brain. Like neuralink but more advanced than that. As in you don't need the chip in your brain to operate it. Considering the body nervous system operates on electrical synapses it's not impossible. We just haven't got there yet. But the idea that a technology like that couldn't exist in the future isn't impossible. Just remember one thing when you research this stuff. About 20 or so years ago I can remember the idea of a touch screen device was considered science fiction. Now we have one in everyone's pocket. The idea that you could control a device with hand gestures was science fiction. Now BMW has that in cars as a gimmick. We have advanced more in the last 80 years since Roswell happened than in the last 1000 years. If what Grusch said about getting our first craft from Italy in the 1930s is correct we may even be able to attribute splitting the atom to that tech. If not it is very coincidental how quickly fiber optics, night vision, and a host of other tech advances became public shortly after Rowsell. A lot of what Bob said has come to be true. I am not going to say whether he is right or wrong but to write him off for the reasons people are listing here is silly. Especially when he was able to show these objects to other people on test nights and it's on tape that he could. No one ever said the government made sense. But when it comes to something like propulsion, it would make more sense. Let's say you took the engine and transmission out of a car and showed it to a scientist from 200 years ago. Do you think they would have any idea what it was even for by only looking at the power source of a vehicles movement? Or do you think they may need to see it operate with the suspension, wheels, driveshaft, axles, etc. To get an understanding of what the engine is even used for? In this case we are talking tech far beyond just a 200 year gap so the idea that just maybe they would think the propulsion guys witnessing how it flies might make sense to get an idea of how it operates in the field.
@@robertmorris4784The sphere in the square box? Sounds like they got the idea from that child's place the shapes toy 😂.
Out of everything I’ve heard, bob lazar sticks out much more than any other source. In an emotional level too.
U don't find anything he says sus ? ..
@@_RasputinReborn_ no. Why would it be sus? Also there’s no credible sources that we can really rely on..
It the best explanation I have ever heard about this topic. Just continue to do your thing man. You are an inspiration to all.
Thanks RT! Cheers!
@@JakeBroe I believe it was stated during the podcast, that the several craft Bob Lazar allegedly witnessed, were said by the personnel to have been unearthed -- not intercepted -- and quite old (can't remember exactly, what the supposed dating was). This interestingly translates to your point about the craft pilots not being able to find the necessary fuel in our system. If the story is true, perhaps our visitors couldn't make it back on the remaining amount... and simply died here -- leaving their vessels to be covered by time. One scouting party after another, they seemingly left a decent collection for us.
Hi Jake,
Great video! I do have a few observations to Mr. Lazar's story.
(1) If Lazar was tasked to work on the reactor system, he would not know about "anti-gravity emitters" or other things in that spacecraft that is not related directly to the reactor.
(2) Element 115 has been theorized since the early 1960s. In fact, I want to say that Carl Sagan referenced it in his television series Cosmos (1980, I think). He described it as the only element of its type which may have a stable (non-radioactive) isotope.
(3) If Lazar worked at the Area 51 facility, as he claims, then he was legally sworn to secrecy. A breech of that would have been a felony. Why was he not immediately arrested? In court, the government would have simply stated that classified research on advanced defense weaponry is conducted at that facility.
(4) If Lazar truly worked on extra-terrestrial craft, he would have been quickly terminated once he had started to give out this "information". He would have suffered some "accident" to silence him permanently.
(5) The sort of craft Lazar describes, together with their performance properties, have been a staple of science fiction, since the late 1940s. In fact, doesn't the diagram of Lazar's UFO interior closely resemble that of the 1951 classic "As the Earth Stood Still", and also of the 1955 classic "This Island Earth", which had a reactor in the middle of the spacecraft? The exterior is very similar the spacecraft of the 1956 classic "The Forbidden Planet", down to the "three anti-gravity emitters". According to Star Trek (1966), the warp drive forms a "warp bubble in which inertia is cancelled", and they went so far to have "inertial dampeners" for the time the spacecraft is not at warp speed.
(6) in reference to "reverse engineering of extraterrestrial technology". This sounds plausible, but may in fact be unlikely. Case-in-point, If you were to take your cellphone and timewarp it back to the 1950s (or even 1960s probably) it is highly unlikely that it could be reverse engineered. Why? The technology to create the individual components (or some of the materials) simply did not exist. Could some of it be reverse engineered? The LCD screen perhaps, but even that would take many years. The electronics, the digital imaging, the onboard data storage, the CPU... not a chance in any reasonable amount of time. Scientists would most certainly have scrutinized it exhaustively, but that would have been about all they could do.
(7) In reference to the US Navy video: My father is a retired USAF fighter pilot (flew F-4). He said that the video is probably accurate, but he strongly believes that the audio is dubbed. Combat pilots speak little in the cockpit to begin with, and become even less talkative under stress. Also he pointed out that the Hud shows the aircraft experiencing up to 5g while the pilots were talking and that is not heard in their voices.
----------------------------
I believe that Bob Lazar is a charlatan, as his story has far too many holes in it. Do I believe in extraterrestrial life? Yes, I do. The mathematical odds, with an estimated one billion Earth type planets in this galaxy alone, certainly speak for it. Do I believe that there is a small percentage of UFOs which many in fact be of extraterrestrial origin? Yes, most certainly. Is it possible that the US Government is in possession of crashed UFOs and possibly the remains of their crews as well? Of course it is.
I think it is far more likely, as a student of History, that what is happening with the UFO disclosures is a false-flag operation. It is far easier to hide cutting edge (or beyond cutting edge) technology in plain sight. How would you accomplish this: Simple: The Pentagon releases a statement basically saying that the technology witnessed does not have an Earthly origin. With that said, and a little faked "concern", they can go about testing advanced weapons and other systems openly.
1- The reactor wold be directly related to the emitters as it is their source of power.
2 - That does not mean it does not exist.
3 - Plausible, but does not eliminate the possibility of them letting him go thinking that his story wold be too unbelievable.
4 - That wold just bring confirmation to his claims. In fact, he told that attempts were made and that was what lead him into telling his story.
5 - Just becouse these concepts have appeared somewhere else in media before does not mean they are fake. In fact, the inspiration for some of them might have come from abduction accounts.
6 - They would not know if they didn't try. Just becouse they can't reverse engeneer it does not mean they would not try.
7 - That's interesting, but I'm sure your father can tell you about the endurance training they go through. I don't think that it is impossible that two pilots wold talk about the ufo they are seeing. It's not like the ufo is chasing them, they were not in a stressful situation. I will check if it is possible to have a normal conversation in 5 Gs though. Overall interesting points.
@@sahlamitos5293 My dad viewed the video several more times, and has come to the same conclusion. :) As far as attempts on Lazar's life? If the government (especially NSA / CIA / NRO) really want you dead, there is very little that you will be able to do to prevent that. Unless these agencies are so incredibly incompetent that they cannot even manage to silence a single guy. There are dozens of drugs that would create the illusion of him passing from a sudden heart attack for example.
@@AgentPepsi1 I don't think that letting only a silgle person slip would make such agencies incompetent at all. Mistakes happen. It just happens that in that case Lazar was smart enough to expose his story for protection. I'm sure many people have been taken down for the same reasons Lazar is wanted.
hell im not gonna read all that
@@AgentPepsi1 is it possible though that his coming forward did prevent them from killing him as he originally intended?
One of the more interesting things about how Bob explained the means of propulsion of these crafts are that these crafts uses an Anti Matter reactor using Element 115 and it basically bends space in front of it to "propel" itself forward. He said this in an interview in the late 1980s. Then a few years later (1994) a Theoretical Physicist named Miguel Alcubierre proposes a speculative warp drive Idea almost word for word of what Bob was talking about. Bending space Infront of the craft using exotic matter as a fuel source.
to be 100% fair, Alcubierre devised the equations as a fun experiment to see if he could solve the solution to the warp drive engines in the StarTrek show he was a fan of...
he didn't propose a speculative warp dive idea, he sat down to find out if the math said warp engines were yay or nay.
Alcubierre also discovered that this technology was, in fact, impossible to produce as the energy necessary to bend the space-time a significant amount is higher than the energy contained in the whole universe
@perseus274 Erm..... no.
@perseus274 Gravity is not a "polar" force in that way, and if it did, the craft wouldn't levitate, it'd go flying towards the attractive pole, just like in magnetism.
Antimatter has positive mass, as shown recently, (in an experiment which took a LOT of people to perform, so no "its fake" nonsense,) and thus, can't be used in an Alcubierre drive.
Here is my question: What has Bob Lazar done for a living since 1989?
In the recent Bob Lazar documentary, it appears that Bob Lazar has a business supplying specialized materials to other labs. Located in California. th-cam.com/video/C4jvIGGvQmo/w-d-xo.html
Selling bullshit.
He ran a few brothels, got arrested for it. Sold chemicals to make fire works illegally online. Got busted for it. Now he sells prints of his UFO drawings, merch, book deals, tv shows, etc.
He formed and runs a company called United Nuclear, they have a Web site, go see 👍
He has his own company
The reason that even numbered elements are more abundant is they're more stable, it's called the Oddo Harkins rule.
I assume hydrogen is the most abundant because also being the simplest (a proton that found an electron)?
Thanks fella
I've been fascinated by Lazar's story since he first called in to Art Bell's late night radio program and remain fascinated and so appreciate the layman's nuts and bolts explanation which I think is pretty good. Like you I find it an interesting exercise in thinking about how the physical universe might work rather than a rabbit hole into which I have to sink all my attention. Will look forward to exploring more of your vids. Tally ho!
Tall y ho?? English I take it. Hope The 🦊 got clear.
I really enjoyed this thought experiment! Seeing the Navy videos somewhat settles the question of "Do these craft exist?" But then we have to ask how they work, and I can't even begin to imagine how they do what they do. Even stranger, I'm starting to think Lazar was being truthful. If that's the case, the universe is a lot weirder than we expected.
I followed Lazar in 89 and throughout the time people were dicrediting him. Then I forgot about it until they announced element 115. Now with the release of the Navy Video's, specifically the gimbel video, it shows a craft doing exactly what Lazar described in 89. He was telling the truth the entire time.
It is obvious he was telling the truth. To me, the big question now is are humans flying around in them now or is it all aliens. They have had the crafts for 70 years now. It is very possible humans could be flying around in them and the navy videos was to test how our military would deal with a vehicle like that. I actually think after watching the interviews of members in the nimitz battle group that its probably humans, at least in that situation. They said that people came on board minutes after the encounters and confiscated all the data. That leads me to believe it was planned or it would have taken much longer for someone to confiscate the data.
@@riftur7636 element 115 was predicted for the first time in 1937 when the electrons per shell preduction were mapped. Creating it and then measuring it just wasn't feasible until moscovium discovery in 2004. It might create gravity but Lazaar just used an already predicted element to back up a flimsy story.
I don't believe him at all. Someone can easily twist known information to bs people that they had a hand in it.
The universe is even weirder than that.
I believe in UFO, I have my own close encounter few years ago just 200 meter away from back door, I was overwhelmed, I thought I was delusional, I called my wife and she confirmed seeing it. I memorized its size and appearance but I forgot to record the event though my phone is just 15 feet away from me. I'm a trained mechanic and I understand what I saw. I'm watching this hovering disc for about 10 second my wife watch it for 5 second before it move horizontally at low speed NE. disc size about 50 feet in diameter, 3 round pole equally placed around disc perimeter with 5 individual round light in between pointed at my direction. At first I thought it was a big drone, but this one is silent, no noise at all. It was around 6.30pm with clear sky hovering about 100 meters above a communication pillar, in shiny dark metallic body. I thought that UFO must be made from planet core metal. This metal has High resistance to electric flow yet excite DC voltage when synchronized with planet's magnetic field. We have abundant of this on the moon surface.
Bob explained in one of his interviews that there's a gravity "a" and "b" wave bound in the nucleus of that isotope of 115, and when the particle accelerator was active, it would consume the 115 by accelerating nuclei into the triangular milled/machined piece of 115, causing a decay reaction in which the 115 would decay into daughter products releasing the gravity waves that the amplifiers use. The remaining reaction products were said to be consumed by a 100% efficient thermionic generator (i.e. all radiation was converted to an electric field) - very interesting stuff.
We've made many isotopes with 115 protons, they all have a half life of less than 1 second. And the US agreed to it being named Moscovium. If the US really thought this element was so important it's strange they'd be fine with it being named after the capital of its major rival.
Prepare the Dilithium Crystals
@@Treblaineit was first discovered in Russia..
Is that a forbidden chapter in Alice in Wonderland? What a load!
@@Treblaine The US would have never come out and reveal it on their own. Russia 'discovered' it and went public with it so they get to name it. If it wasn't for Bob Lazar, they'd have no idea that it could made into a stable isotope that has the ability to be modulated to discharge gravity waves. The fact that the US didn't come out with it says it all. The US leads the world in science (hard to believe sometimes).
Another brilliant, extremely well expressed, genuinely passionate and intriguing scientific clip. I do also agree personally that Bob Lazar is legit and i quite admire the way he acted.
Bob Lazar has come up with new lies for decades. He's never to be found in one room with an actual physicist.
@@MrCmon113 what (lies) has he come up with exactly? he also probably has been with plenty of scientists/physicists before just not on camera, he also doesnt want to be on camera in the first place since he is enough trouble already.
@@paulhope3401 it's not obvioua that he's lying at all bruh, as bob said, he had no idea how they managed to fly the thing, he was only there to examine the thing, now anyone with a brain understands that they clearly didn't know how it works but it doesn't mean that they can not test fly it, i mean that's the only way to do progress. for instance someone can drive a car without understanding how it works? how is this any different. there is literally more evidence of him saying the truth than him not saying the truth. your'e reasoning for why it is somehow "obvious" that he's lying is soooo pathetic jesus.
@@paulhope3401 well how tho the aliens control it? maybe thats just how it is? it doesnt have wiring why is it so hard to comprehend. they didn't know the exact star system they were only speculating, bob lazar even said that he had no idea how they got the information where they came from ? so why are u blaiming bob for it lol. again there is so much more proof that he's truthful than that he wouldnt be truthful. you make no sense what so ever.... all of this that u wrote is so irrelevant dude.
@@paulhope3401 no? Why would i believe the earth is flat? That has like absolutely nothing To do with this? Also Maybe the aliens are simply so technologically advanced that simply do not need wiring or physical controls that we would understand, thats why u dont believe Bob but cmon man you can not honestly be that ignorant that because one thing doesnt make sense To you u draw the line completely
I learned a lot here. This was absolutely fascinating top to bottom.
Glad you found it interesting! Cheers!
The fascinating part is how Bob has kept this scam going for 30 years now
Dear Jake. I remember that cursed 24th February when I got you in my feed for the first time. Since then your updates are part of my household's coffee routine. Watching this two years later I could state that you are friend of logic, defender of democracy and an honest, diligent guy that anyone would be glad to have as a friend.
Why do you say cursed? Just kidding, right?
I loved this brainstorming. This is how technology and science pushes forward.
Thank you.
And you are right, maybe we don’t have that element now, but since there are inter-solar objects, maybe one day we can intercept one.
Thanks Alan! I definitely think within this decade we will be able to identify, track, and intercept an object from outside our solar system and test its composition. I can't wait to see what we find!
@@JakeBroe It's already a reality but it's top secret!
@@JakeBroe this comment gives me hope
@@JakeBroeGravity is NOT a force!! There is no pulling going on between the earth and the moon ! Gravity is simply the warping of spacetime around massive objects ✅
I didn’t like the Netflix documentary either. The Joe Rogan podcast is very good.
Excellent video Jake - many thanks for creating it and sharing 👍
I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but I'm definitely not even remotely close to being the dumbest either. So I understand a lot of this type of science (not talking about element 115, but with the other elements more commonly known) and find it utterly fascinating. However every time I try to either read up on 115 or watch something about it. I either get way to much science and overload lol and end up saying: “screw this, I don't get it." However with this video, you broke it down to where it was not only listenable, but followable in a kinda fun and interesting way. Which to me, is key in learning anything new so for that I say thank you.
Sorry, no. The nuclei in normal matter are already brimming with exchange particles at near light speed and with neutrons too.
Energy itself has gravitational pull, transforming between mass and energy doesn't create extra gravity, going to element 115 won't change that.
I agree... very watchable. I am not too sure what it was I was watching but it was interesting watching whatever it is I just watched! 😂😂
You're absolutely right. Jake frankly admits he's not a scientist, yet he's clearly got that brilliant teaching talent of understanding and then easily explaining all the complicated knowledge in a just amazingly comprehensive way. Just like prof. Alber Einstein once said to other professors: "Genius is making complex ideas simple, NOT making simple ideas complex."
@@Adam_Adamsky Same guy also said that you shouldn't make things simpler than they are. Ol' Alberts also predicted gravitational waves 100 years ago, which puts Mr. Lazard predicting them 40 years ago kinda in perspective.
@@lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881 why are you addressing your opinions to me? I'm not your censor, you can have any opinions you like, no need to send them to anyone for proofreading 🤣
Thank you Jake for making this insightful video presentation. It’s exciting to think about the possibilities that future technologies may bring us. It’s cool to see someone working into the science of ufo.
The comments here are from many reputed scientists.
Im in awe.
It should be.
Jake, that was a masterclass in explaining complex ideas in a simplistic way. You are much closer to true than many now realize.Sometimes you clays make me so happy - thanks for that! 🙂
At last a youtuber who understands the potential of pseudoscience. Subscribed
Awesome! Welcome to the channel snipergh! Great to have you with us!
Jeremy is like a used car salesman
Hahahaha
Reminds me of a late night diet/vitamin infomercial pitchman 🤭 . Edit: Or the odd home shopping knife dude that will include an "authentic medieval fantasy broadsword" if you call now 🤣
Oh I remember watching a documentary about Bob Lazar many years ago. I was always very skeptical of this guy though.
I should clarify, after watching your video I have gain some new appreciation for his story. Love these videos!
Thanks Wolfgang! Ultimately, if Bob had proof he had Element 115 in his house at one point, then this whole debate would be over. Why he hasn't come forward with the element is really what this is all about at this point. He might be waiting to die of old age before releasing his proof because he has threatened the government that if they kill him, then his proof of 115 goes public instantly.
@@JakeBroe Good point, also I remember in one of his earlier interviews the interviewer asked him why government hasn't done anything to stop him from divulging all these supposed classified information. If the government had done anything to him that would actually vindicate his story even more. Probabilistically speaking, I think it's very unlikely that we are alone in the universe but I highly doubt that the UFOs that we are observing are extraterrestrial beings; in fact there are couple videos on TH-cam debunking the two released footage.
@@JakeBroe Because Bob Lazar is an obvious fraud. He is childishly transparent. But he illustrates the whole problem of the area of "ufology". Because the scientific community has steered well clear of it as a legitimate subject of study, the field has been left open to the fantasists, the frauds and the conspiracy theorists. Result: fringe nutbags like Bob Lazar and Jeremy Corbell emerge as the spokespeople for the whole field of study. That is an utter disaster for the credibility of ufology.
Hopefully, more and more serious scientists will have the courage to investigate the phenomenon, bringing proper scientific methodology to bear on it - and eventually consigning the likes of Lazar and Corbell to the dustbin of history.
@@JakeBroe Who would they arrest if Bob Lazar suddenly wound up dead?
@@JakeBroe
That people believe this bs for an instance is absolutely amazing to me. I think your priors are totally out of whack.
I have researched all those lines for years just out of curiosity..... I keep on open mind. Your logic is spot on. The implications- solid. Hats off brother! No way I can disagree to any part this.. Fabulous job! Keep em flowing..
Jake, correction. The Saucer does not "bump" anything out of the way. According to Lazar, this machine bends space. Therefore, since space itself is bent around the outside of the craft, nothing would hit it since the space it inhabits would curve around the outside of the gravitational field.
To bend space locally it would require more energy than even antimatter can produce.
@@chompchompnomnom4256 key is dark matter
@@UTINNI_36 Key is actually flux capacitors.
@@chompchompnomnom4256 Wow, stop! So you know how space can be bend? Then why you don't build a space bending machine?
@@chompchompnomnom4256 as we are all armchair scientists we can only speculate. We have never created 100% efficient antimatter propulsion system so you are only speculating.....secondly.....Lazar specifically stated that the conversion is done thru a stable version of element 115 inside an exotic form of a cyclotron. There is definitely 0 ways to even speculate on that, so a disbelief in his statement holds as much value as a belief in it.
There are many obvious questions that Bob Lazar’s description brings up. For example:
1. What has antimatter got to do with element 115 and the production of gravity fields? Where does antimatter fit in and how? Where is it stored? In what form is it? Is it used in the reactor?
2. He claims that a working craft had one of the gravity emitters removed and working outside the craft on a bench. This raises 2 immediate questions: a) how was it removed, considering his description of the craft being constructed without parts or seams. Was it cut out somehow? And b) how was it powered since the reactor must still be in the craft in order for the craft to remain functional. So where was the reactor to power the emitter on the bench? And how was it connected up to the bench emitter?
3. Bob describes the propulsion as being derived from the three emitters swivelled into different configurations. But he also mentions a cardioid gravity field created around the craft by the central column. What’s the relationship between these two systems? How does the central column produce the gravity field and what is its purpose, given that the emitters seem to do everything required.
4. Bob describes a pipe that is used to connect the emitter to the ceiling and thus a creates a flexible coupling which allows the 360/180 degree movement of the emitter. He says this was working on the benched emitter but how is this flexing controlled? What is the control mechanism that allows a scientist to operate it on the bench and make it flex? In other words, how do the scientists interact both with the benched emitter - and with the craft control systems, for that matter?
There are so many simple questions like this which Bob’s story raises. I would love to hear his answers.
Yes, it would be useful to ask Bob. Unfortunately Joe Rogan wasted at least 20 minutes during the interview with Bob rambling about monkeys with sticks and stoner philosophy, and Beard Guy wasn't helpful.
1) As I recall, the antimatter was not stored anywhere; it was produced by the E115 under stimulation.
2) It had already been removed when Bob saw it, and compartmentalism required that he was not informed things he did not need to know. I don't remember, were there three reactors (one for each emitter) or only one in the ship?
3) It has something to do with the waveguides that were attached to the reactor. The reactor produced electric power for the rest of the ship in addition to powering the three emitters.
4) I got the idea that you could easily bend it by hand but it was stiff to the forces in the direction of emission.
@@codetech5598 1) So that raises even more questions. What happens to the antimatter? Bob says there was absolutely no waste heat. But antimatter production would result in annihilation with massive gamma ray production from 100% mass-energy conversion. It’s also not clear where the energy to create the antimatter would come from.
2) There was one reactor and three amplifiers, one per emitter. Even if he’d not been there when it was removed, it would surely show signs of cutting if it had been removed that way.
3) The descriptions I’ve seen all sound extremely vague, as though it’s just guesswork and theorising.
4) He explains that it’s used to direct the three emitters. I doubt they’d be doing that by hand, after going down the hatch 😄 Bob also said the pipe solidified “like a weld” once it had bent itself into the required direction.
Every answer prompts further questions, which is good, to get a better understanding of what Bob experienced while working there.
...Or Why he refuses to be interviewed by a physicist.
Or why he gets all his physics wrong.
Or why he Lied about being enrolled in MIT and Caltech.
Or why he couldn't name his advisor for his program...
...Lots of basic questions.
Or we could just accept that Bob Liezar is a disinformation vendor and ignore him. Real scientists are researching real UFO sightings.
@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 Did Bob ever say that he lived in Massachusetts and attended MIT? I just remember him saying he had classes from MIT which could be anything for example night school sponsored by MIT held at another location, correspondence courses by mail, etc.
@@codetech5598 He has had many version's. In his latest he said was sent to MIT for the military on a secret project (JRE podcast).. MIT has no night school for physics, certainty not for advanced courses, and internet courses didn't exist.
He claimed the government wiped out his records, yet nobody at MIT ever saw him. (And his story keeps changing).
Insanely well done thought experiment. The idea that we are missing the tech, because we are missing an element that could be abundant in another solar system, is super plausible.
Lol and why is it "super plausible"? You're just making stuff up.
@@punkypinko2965 Yeah, you're dumber than a damn bag of hammers, kid. If you didn't comprehend what he said, that's on you.
I agree. He's possibly on to something with that. It's absolutely plausible and kind blows the mind to consider it.
actually its not at all. We would be able to "see" heavier elements like element 115 in other stars with our telescopes using spectroscopy. Its nonsense that "element 115" possibly "occurs in a different part of the universe" .. It might one day exist, a quadrillion years into the future, after 100 generations of stars have been able to live and die and collapse on each other, but the universe, at 13.5 billion years of age, is simply too young to have this be a reality.
@@punkypinko2965 do you know what plausible means? doesn’t mean “likely,” it’s just leaving it up to future knowledge
I think this is exactly why Bob Lazar did not want to go public with his knowledge.
Just a short comment on 10:00 the particle accelerator: a cyclotron is a very common particle accelerator and a relatively simple one. It is around since the 1930s, with the first ones built in Paris and Berkeley. If you read about Operation Epsilon (1943-45) you will find that there have been at least two German ones (Berlin and Heidelberg), the French one in Paris and another one in St. Peterburg.
Yes, a cyclotron is a standard piece of laboratory equipment. It is especially useful for producing photons in every wavelength, through bremsstrahlung
Thank you
The University of Rochester N.Y. had a cyclotron, has been dismantled, the building repurposed. The University had installed a seven million volt cyclotron in Bausch & Lomb in 1936. In 1947 a new 250 million volt cyclotron was installed in a new building on the south edge of the River Campus.
Cyclotron are the basis of most radio therapy machines. They are in widespread use.
Jake: *States he isn’t scientist*
Proceeds to state he has a degree in the sciences and speaks in purely science jargon for 30 minutes
Haha, I love science!
@@jeffd.8917 Why did they wipe his existence, this has been proven because there are documents with his name associating him with the school and the company that weren't destroyed
@@jeffd.8917 HAHAHA Yeah, he's lying. That's why there is an extant copy of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Newspaper with Lazar on the cover with a picture of the jet car he built. The paper describes Lazar as an Engineer. HHHMMMMMMM
@@jeffd.8917 its definitely frustrating to accept that he is telling the truth but take into consideration the fbi, cia, nsa issues of talking about the details. And even how it might be possible that scientists/engineers were hand picked and contracted under private terms of conduct. This implies that the project managers handled all the intelligence and core research while the scientists were left in unsurity. Thats what I believe.
Also consider how when asking for data on a certain element at a research lab, that element is sent there to unsuspecting scientists as that is a privately funded task. Those material scientists/researchers would just be observing an element and describing it, as they always do. They wouldnt know why they are doing it and for whom (institutionally) at what insight/reason. Its just the way of the world.
@@jeffd.8917 Jeff, you obviously have not done any research regarding Bob Lazar and it being verified of his employment and employers prior to being contracted by the military to work at S7. Thankfully, other professionals like George Knapp whom has been awarded Numerous journalism awards throughout his 40+ years of reporting. Additionally, multiple ex-coworkers verified Bob’s employment at these world class scientific research and development companies and that Bob was highly skilled at his knowledge of physics. I say all of this not to imply I wholeheartedly agree with his statements because if you had actually watched documentary in addition to multiple interviews he has given over the years, he does not make definitive claims about aliens. The only thing he is and has consistently described in laymen terms, purposely mind you, is the aspect of working on back engineering the propulsion of this UFO’s or UAP’s now. In fact, despite our gov’t doing their best to scrub his credentials they have all been verified. Your lame criticism is Bob in this documentary chose to not use highly technical physics terminology is why you then state as if this is somehow hard evidence, because you are intellectually superior on physics terms to Mr. Lazar, he should be discredited. Jeff, I obviously do not know you but I can use your same logic that you applied to Mr. Lazar to draw a conclusion and apply to you. First you seem like the sort of fella that is confident in your ignorance and furthermore assume because you are so confident in your ignorance you feel compelled to share it with everyone because you assume the rest of us would appreciate if not be downright be thankful to you. I think many that may have wasted their time in reading your post as with many others on a wide range of subject matter would agree with my assessment of your comment and you with humbly asking you to save yourself the embarrassment of showcasing to all your embrace of sharing your ignorance. I’m sure many others would have like to reply to what I can only assume are a multiple of ignorant comments you made many times on social media but simply didn’t want to take the time and effort to reply. I would strongly encourage you Jeff D. to take just a bit more time before you make a comment and ask yourself if it adds anything of value, is what you are going to write well though out and based on fact or if it is just your observation which simply put is an opinion. I’m sure you are not going to like my comment and want to reply fiercely which you certainly have the right to. However, before you do I would encourage you to re-read this reply and implement sound advice I tried to provide to you. Best Wishes, Mr. Lovejoy
I'm not trying to be a pedantic jerk, but I have a couple issues:
0. Bob Lazar is not a dumb guy. In-fact, I think he's a very very intelligent guy. But that doesn't mean that he isn't lying for his own vanity/notoriety/financial gain, or nuts. None of those are mutually exclusive. Also, the claims that these UFOs aren't affected by gravity/don't have exhaust plumes/heat signatures etc. has been examined by several people, but thunderf00t's video is a good example of some of the issues that people seem to be overlooking. th-cam.com/video/VCH7BWGpl5s/w-d-xo.html
1. You can't say "sci-fi thinking" but then reference real-life science (sometimes incorrectly) and think that is a valid shield for criticism. This is what quantum mystics and woo-peddlers do. They will use science that supports whatever they are trying to sell and either ignore or try to invalidate science that doesn't.
2. You are incorrect about the transuranic elements- for example, there is naturally occurring plutonium in pitchblende. It's likely that elements above uranium existed in the solar nebula (and even on earth) originally but have decayed by the current era because their short half-lives. Read about primordial nuclides if you're interested.
3. I have never heard this binary star system theory for the formation of the earth. I've heard of the Nemesis idea, which the sun had a companion brown dwarf out beyond the Oort cloud (95,000 AU). I don't think it's crazy to think that there might have been a companion star to the sun born in the same nebula, but it's much more likely (especially since we don't see a stellar remnant in our system) that if there was a companion star, one of them was disturbed and pulled away from the binary system while still they were still in their birth cluster.
4. The heaviest elements are now thought to only form in the r-process during neutron star collisions. It looks as though supernova nucleosynthesis doesn't seem to be the primary method for creating the heavier elements as was once thought. This is mainly because the densities are so low after the star blows itself apart. This could of course change with more evidence in the future.
5. If you are creating a gravity well, you're creating an event horizon in front of your ship which will, like a black hole's event horizon, catch all matter at it's edge as you travel through space (gas molecules, micrometeoroids, etc.) and cause it to "freeze" at the horizon until you come to a stop. The "frozen" matter will then be released with all of the energy that it's collected during your travels- likely creating a giant death-beam pointed directly in front of you, wherever you come to a stop at. You're also going to get intense blue shifting of light from in front of your ship which will up shift lower frequency light into gamma rays, meaning make sure you have good eye protection and quite a bit of shielding on the front of your ship- well it doesn't really matter- you're going to get baked by high energy ionizing radiation anyways.
6. We can manufacture element 115, it's just not stable. Moscovium 290 has a half-life of only 650ms. According to what we have predicted based on the "island of stability" , it looks like even Moscovium (Mc 291) still isn't stable. Maybe there is a stable isotope at 292 or 293, but I doubt it. But I also don't think it matters- I don't see any property which was ascribed to the element happening, based on #7 below.
7. Beta decay allows a neutron and proton to convert to each other. You're just changing an up quark into a down quark or vice-versa. This process happens all of the time and I don't see why it would produce any type of gravitational radiation or why it would cause properties not shared (even just partially) by any other element.
For your point number 4, check out the possible explanation for the abundance of heavy elements in Przybylski's star..
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Przybylski%27s_Star
He is in fact lying. His science is not real physics and he was actually convicted of fraud in a brothel ownership scheme in Nevada. All in public record. He also lied about having a physics degree from a university Stanton
Friedman researched and discovered he lied about attending. He is very charming and convincing but most con men have that characteristic. We don't need him. New data is emerging that actually can be explained by physics--that
doesn't mean there isn't a huge wow factor because there is indeed. One being the amounts of energy necessary
to achieve the many mach accelerations observed. Thousands of Giga Watts to begin.
8
Thank you someone that can see the holes in his science!
I remember years back when I heard Lazar describe that UFO's create a Gravity well, and that they just fall into the well to propel the craft. That made so much sense for me.
In 1953 my Dad had a UFO encounter in Colorado Springs at about 2 AM. Just sitting in the middle of a Country road blocking his travel. What he called three small people outside the craft. Dad came to a stop a couple hundred feet from the Craft. He described the incident for the first time to me in about 1970, Years Later when Lazar sketched out his Sport Model drawing . I realized his Sport Model was what my Dad had described that the UFO he had seen looked like. Dad joked to me that proves even Aliens have to stop along road to take a pee once in a while.
Colorado Springs is in the area of the Air Force Academy and NORAD, other Military bases, also downwind of the NUKE Tests the Military did in the 50's. So the area would have been of interest to Aliens
What's interesting is Lazar's explanation, as you mentioned, implies the vehicle is constantly falling towards a gravitational center, like an object falls to earth. How much acceleration could a body handle fro extended periods of time? My guess would be 3 -4 g's. Acceleration would be limited by the ability of the ship and occupants do not get 'spagettified', like we've seen happen to objects falling into Jupiter. This would explain the very rapid acceleration.
@@j.d.waterhouse4197 Look at Lazars original sketch of the Sport Model. There is a box next to each of the three crew seats. I think Lazar refereed to the Boxes as Amplifiers. I think those three Boxes also put the crew in a gravity bubble that negates the outside acceleration of the craft the craft goes through. So I think the interior occupants do not feel any movement during flight.
@@stevehughes5403 Well, according to Lazar, the ship AND the crew are constantly 'falling' towards the direction they are moving. A gravitational force is somehow created in the direction the occupants want to move (using amounts of energy we are not capable of creating today). Thus there's no need to 'undo' gravity' in the ship -as long as the gravitational force isn't so great as to cause 'spagettization'. This is still a very great force, 3 or 4 g's would be probably safe. Think of how fast a parachutist accelerates when they jump out of an airplane. That's just 1 g. If a ship and crew were all subject to that same force, all would accelerate at the same time, the same as if you were inside a container and dropped from that plane, you would feel nothing. Inside the ship you wouldn't even know you were accelerating.
@@stevehughes5403 A ship (tic tac) that can great a "gravity well" deep enough to make it go from zero to say Mach 50 near the ocean would suck all the water up into it along with the craft.
I just watched your podcast on UFO's. Very interesting, I think Gene Roddenberry explained the matter/antimatter propulsion system used in Star Trek, 57 years ago with the discovery of Dilithium Crystals found on asteroids and mined on distance planets. That must be Element 115 in its natural state.
Element 115 is called Moscovium and has properties similar to lead. Nothing special about it. Lazar is a fraud.
You know Star Trek is a fictional TV show, right?
@@lucasoheyze4597 why do we have simple people like you that always seem to miss the point. Obviously the original posters knows its a fictional Tv show but the way the creator talked about the antimatter propulsion system is similar to how Bob Lazar described the stable form of Element 115.
The only thing Roddenberry was mining was prospective actresses to play space princesses on these distant planets.
@@JamesHeller-if5kg Bob's story is fiction, and also can be traced to most fiction. Dude has been nothing but a conman his whole life.
Really enjoyed this presentation. Ever since I watched the Lazar interview, I've wondered what the inside of the crafts gravity would be like and whether inertia affected it's occupants. You answered that questions for me, so thanks!
ofc it wouldnt , otherwise they would die
Inertia would not affect someone in a craft that is gravity driven. The gravity would pull uniformly on the ship and its occupants, a bit like free falling. If something like that was possible you could accelerate at 200G, no problem.
Bob Lazar answered these questions as well.
Who says the UAP's come from our concept of space and time? They are sometimes an event in the space and time we experience. It doesn't mean they come from another star or galaxy.
Exactly!!
This was so entertaining and interresting. I believe having this kind of thought experiments can accidentelly result in real discoverys 😊 Thanks for a fun moment!
Jake, absolutely great video. Other videos only try to discredit Lazar's story without offering much. You offer a creative perspective on the plausibility of how the science might be possible. Really enjoyed it. Question: did you ever wonder how the power generator would be turned off if the event of turning the generator on created a gravity field around it? Also, my favorite part of Lazar's story is his description of the retractable hatch inside the deck of the craft designed like a collapsing honeycomb. The simplicity and efficient design conception of the idea is so appealing and convincing. Was there a particular part of Lazar's story you found particularly compelling?
Hey Paul! Thanks for the comment. I think the most compelling part of Bob's story is just his interest in the technology. He doesn't seem to care about alien life. If he is a liar, then he is just making up a story about alien technology and NOT about extraterrestrial life. It's interesting!
@@JakeBroe well if that's his story (alien beings, spaceship) don't you think that will be the most important story in the whole history of the world?
That would make it more important that the Manhattan Project of ww2 (splitting of the atom) - how come the scientific community is silent on this...they are still looking for ET with their SETI
There are no "gravity emitters", so nothing to turn off. There's still inertia in outer space with no gravity. If there wasn't, any asteroid could be stopped by any other object. Bob Lazar just doesn't understand the physics. Not a surprise, since he isn't a physicist and never went to MIT or Caltech.
Gravity propulsion is Warp drive, aka wormholes in space-time by distorted spatial geometry. Spatial geometry distorts when large amounts of mass or energy is concentrated into a small area. You need large amounts of gravity to have gravity waves. And that required huge amounts of energy. Energy is related to mass by E=mc^2. So we know you need 1/10 the mass of the Sun worth of energy to bend space enough to make a bubble. That's larger than the little spaceship could possibly carry. It's a definite "No".
Any UFOs would be Electro-Magnetic powered, or nuclear powered, or "other". "Gravity powered" simply doesn't work on small scales.
Lol The hatch is funny cause it was the only thing they understood how it worked. We need you to figure out how this craft works "we have no idea its like magic but we figured out how the hatch and the deck door works"
@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 Of course he's not a physicist. That's exactly why military hired him, because they hire only random uneducated bums. Also, it's a long time known fact there's nothing more to discover in physics or in any other field of science, as we already know everything. We should finally stop with all research projects and direct our efforts into building bigger shopping malls.
Thank you for a great video. Mr Lazar mentioned in one of his interviews that the basketball sized particle accelerator on board used a stable form of element 115 machined into specific slices. It was bombarded by a particle and made to transmute to element 116, which decayed instantly. This transmutation created anti-matter, which after combining with an inert gas in a controlled space in the reactor, created pure energy with no waste. Yes, this observation was in direct contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics but this is what Mr Lazar observed, according to his experience. The immense energy created by this transmutation allowed the craft to focus it and distort time and space. This was illustrated by Mr Lazar observing a candle flame placed onto the distortion and observing the candle continuing to burn… but seeing the flame flicker no more.
This comment..........explanation is perfect!
My father's friend once told him that the n.e.s.t team would be the ones who would escort element 115 freshly prepared at los Alamos to area S4 , ofcourse he might be lying
tremendous
I have not heard Bob say that 115 was transmuted to 116. I believe he said when the 115 was bombarded it released both antimatter as well as gravitons. You are correct that the antimatter was immediately converted to energy with no heat and used as well as discharged by the ship. The gravitons were directed to the 3 wave guide emitters below deck that amplified the gravity waves and directed them. Bob took a piece of 115 home and conducted experiments on it showing, when electrically excited, it deflected light. That is the reason Bob is still being monitored because the piece of 115 he took has never been recovered and he refuses to talk about it.
@@jamesleadley7872 I’m referring to the talk he gave in 1990. Believe it or not, that video (a bad grainy version with Bob driving off in a red Corvette) has now been censored by YT.
In that video Mr Lazar discusses what we knew about gravity at the time and how basically there are two types of observable gravity. Gravity A & B. You can break the hold of Gravity A briefly by jumping in the air. Gravity B is much more difficult to observe but it is basically the force that holds matter together. Again, according to this explanation, a stable version of Element 115 has a larger gravity B field due to it’s bigger size (compared to Hydrogen for ex) Now these fields are still infinitesimal but reactor allegedly had the ability to amplify this field and when this was achieved the operator had the capability to amplify it more or less as you would a volume knob. The 115 to 116 controlled transmutation part of the process was necessary for the other purpose of the reactor - energy to power the craft’s other demands.
I’m not a physicist by any stretch, however I do believe that the explanation given to Mr Lazar first, and then by him after he allegedly worked on the reactor, makes a lot of sense. Thank you for a great reply. It’s so difficult to talk about these matters in a serious, organized way. Most people laugh it off as science fiction. I happen to believe what Mr Lazar is saying. His motive to make up a story like this and stick to it for 30+ years is absent.
Ok, so, the craft generates an electromagnetic field around itself. The three engines emit electromagnetic fields as well. The fields are manipulated to harmonize and vibrate in such a way that they cause spacetime to warp, like ripples in water, which is visually observed in the intense light fields sometimes observed around these craft. The generate waves of gravitational effects that separate everything inside the larger field from ordinary spacetime effects, creating its own kind of spacetime which remains somewhat relative to "normal" spacetime. No actually gravity is created, just manipulated, as gravity is a natural effect of the bending of spacetime. This places the craft and all matter within in a state of superposition cancelling out the effects of inertia partially or entirely. However, the energy of these gravitational effects can and are also harnessed, especially when the energy needs for acceleration exceeds the craft's internal power generation capabilities. The craft, amplifiers, and engines are all magnetic within. It's possible sound waves within specialized chambers are also used, but in this configuration may be unnecessary. However, I suspect that certain cavities within the engines, or the lower deck in its entirety, are the gas filled chamber where such sound waves may be used, especially considering how the engines function in this configuration. The lower chambers shape and position based on the function of the engine's would be the perfect place, size, and shape, to optimize performance for this function. The science and engineering is sound behind the description anddesign, and wouldn't actually break physics, just the common misconceptions of physics. Based on my calculations, and in comparison to the navy's recently released patent of similar technology, this ship is about 50 to 100 years outside the scope of public knowledge and capabilities.
The nanotechnology and engineering in this ship is necessary for reliability in long distance travel to places where you can't get new parts or pull into a mechanics shop. From our position, it's seemingly flawless, even though it's only nearly not.
"Based on my calculations, and in comparison to the navy's recently released patent of similar technology, this ship is about 50 to 100 years outside the scope of public knowledge "
The "public", as in non-scientists, don't understand physics or care to try unless they are physicists so your "50 - 100 years outside..." comment only makes any sense if you are saying its going to take 50 - 100 years for our best scientists to figure it out. Well if that's the case then how did you do "calculations" on it and come up with that lengthy Star-Trek like explanation? If Lazar and his team of equally well known "geniuses" of modern physics claim they couldn't figure out how it worked then I guess your lengthy explanation above is pure bullshit (along with Lazar's own reams of techno bullshit) unless you were there and participated in a more successful attempt, right? BTW, you forgot the part where element 115 is fed through the "flux capacitor" to do the space warping.
@@georgesmith4639 neither one of you know what the f your talking about, but it was cute watching you both regurgitate things you’ve heard and play pretend Physicists.
@@georgesmith4639 dude if you don't believe and think Lazarus full of
When can i get my turn in the sports model 👽🛸 . What you say is 🤔 partly right . Best not to think of the physics behind this craft apart from it's not ours. I know Bob Lazar is legit for many reasons . Most fascinating thing to me is that the craft was discovered in an archeological dig 😲 . Now imagine coming across this craft . Doesn't behave like a beamship going from solid matter to fine matter to travel faster than light
Tesla may have been onto that frequency and vibration thing
The answer is yes it is possible and we've seen it on video evidence of craft doing things that break the "Laws of Physics"
Human-made laws of physics are very limited at the moment
Lazar has explained that the "Cyclotron" like device in the craft's power source reactor accelerates Protons which are used to bombard the Element 115 "fuel" similarly to known Fission nuclear reactions where Neutrons bombard atoms, in particular heavy elements such as Uranium to make them split releasing energy.
Anti hydrogen is created by anti proton striking E115 (after some kind of mass reduction of a slightly heavier element)
My guess? Hyper static electro field charge generator. Look at me sounding as if I could actually build this sh......t
Problem is moscovium is highly radioactive and bombarding any highly radioactive heavy metal with protons or neutrons is only going to make it a lot more radioactive and with they way he explained it you would require heavy dense metals like lead or tungsten for shielding. Have you seen the shielding around the Large Hadron Collider which is a huge cyclotron just stretched out across 2 different countries boarders or even a submarine nuclear reactor (not a cyclotron but highly radioactive) with the tons and tons of tungsten and lead shielding plus water for shielding and cooling. I’m not so sure if I believe him but if it was true then what they had was not moscovium aka element 115 and I think they called it element 115 because they didn’t know what it was because 115 was undiscovered back then so to add to its mystique they just named it element 115. If it is real and they do have this fuel then it’s probably an artificially made material as I think aliens that advanced would not be mining for a fuel source wether if it is found in their part of the galaxy or not plus moscovium has a half life of a few milliseconds and all projected isotopes have a short half life of milliseconds so they probably is not a stable isotope that they could mine not that they would mine anything with their hyper advanced intellect and technology. Plus how would Lazar know that it was mined ? Has he spoke to an alien did they tell him this ? He said he had not met the crafts makers 🤔
@@jamesstephenson2644 I don't remember Lazar stating Anti Protons bombarded the 115 to precipitate some kind of proton induced fission of the element 115, he has stated once a proton bombards the element 115 an "A wave" emission occurs along with an emission of other radiation including I believe an Anti Proton which is annihilated with possibly atmospheric gas then utilizing the resulting energy being induced into essentially, as Lazar describes, what appears to be a 100% efficient thermionic generator.
Lazar is a lying fool, as Element 115, called Moscovium, was synthesized in 2003. It's most stable isotope has a half life of 0.63 seconds. See, con man Lazar used element 115 in his lies, because it wasn't yet made, and was TOO DUMB to know all physicists predicted a tiny half life, rendering unusable for "fuel". Hence, humans don't use it.
Bob is full of BS, and ignorance of science.
@@kennethc2466 my point exactly as I mentioned above. He also tripped him self up when he said they mined it because it was stable where they are from but also said that he had never met the crafts inhabitants so how did he know it was mined ?, presumably they would have to tell him this. His story is so full of holes it wouldn’t hold water. What would a hyper intelligent entity be doing mining lmao, he also never produced his PHD certificate on many occasions when asked to. If this secret was real and he divulged it then it’s tantamount to treason because anyone that has a lawful security clearance has it for life even when they retire like Luis Elazondo so they can divulge nothing and have to take all of the secrets to the grave……
What I found interesting the most is that everything that Bob Lazar mentioned 30 years ago (which sounded ridiculous or improbable back then) has been discovered since the , element 115, gravitational waves and so on... Definitely adds credibility in my eyes.
Eh, he is lying. Guy cant properly explain what he is studying yet
@@mattk8810 everything lazar claimed 30 years ago has came to fruition.
@@craigmcguire6573I didn't really believe lazars story for the first few years after joes podcast came out. But seeing the craft fly belly first is hard to predict. And people say " We already knew they fly belly first" You can't find 1 single article claiming that before 1989. It literally doesn't exist
@@mattk8810I think he claimed to only work their for 6 months. And likely if there is truth to it, it’s far beyond our understanding and we only know limited info about the craft. I could imagine how primitive our technology is to a civilization far older than ours. I don’t know if bob is lying but I do believe we’re not alone in the universe.
Gravitational waves were discovered long ago
This was kinda profound. Thought provoking for sure, and you explain your concepts well. Glad I came across this video. It's like it's scraping at the outside of a large discovery.
Bob described 115 as the fuel, it was under a hemisphere of metal and a flat thick plate that it all set on top of.
115 was a cone shape. I picture the 115 cone shape releasing particles outward but this hemisphere of material directs it either back to the cone, or down to the thick plate of material.
@perseus274 It doesn't need to be irradiated to decay, it does that on its own. It has a half-life of less than a second.
Try storing that in a fuel tank or whatever.
hi Jake I'v seen many of your videos, but this was the most interesting yet. I hope to see more like this one. Someone said we are at the stage with quantum physics where Newton was when the apple fell on his head. thank you
I remember a story that he moved his company out of the southwest and the feds raided his new company location not long after….they must think he chipped off a small piece of 115 …or they’re trying to prove a point. Honestly the guy comes off as being an honest person and his story hasn’t changed a bit since he first told it, rather as time progresses its proven to be true at every turn.
Yes, and that piece of Element 115 was given by aliens to the US for experimental purposes.
Mc is highly radioactive the known isotopes decay away in just a few minutes. You would risk severe poisoning carrying it around.
The raid was related to an investigation into the death of someone who ordered a chemical from his store. It had nothing to do with his made-up story. He was convicted of a felony for selling illegal substances.
@@gbennett58 Okay fedboy
You are an amazingly good presenter and it is awesome to see yo break out into scientific topics. Well done. However, I did nearly fall off my chair laughing at you calling Gd gold instead of Gadolinium. Understandable under the pressure of presenting, but still a funny blooper.
Nicely presented about an incredibly important controversy: if Lazar is legit, every existential construct is suspect; if he is a fraud, why the Area 51 anomalies, and why are there millions of followers. It’s hard to envision where there might be a middle ground.
Investing plus science? Ok this channel is amazing liked and subbed. Thanks for the amazing content.
Awesome! Welcome to the channel Oranegz! Great to have you with us!
Very true: confirmation of alien existence would be a wow moment but in the long term the interesting subject is the technological influence and impact.
It would be a bruh momento
I don't think aliens or other unknown earth based intelligences would share their knowledge with us at all. We wouldn't have anything to benefit them in return.
You describe the process so well.
I love learning about this stuff
Thanks for a very interesting and informative video.
This came up on my feed, a vid you did a year ago.😆i totally enjoyed this trip inside your mind, thoroughly enjoyed some science thrown in there as well. As a Rock Dr you answered some of my queries concerning EVERYTHING you touched on. Please consider doing more of these (fun thought) vids.
I really enjoy your vids concerning the Disastress War in Ukraine too,😢 much appreciated. Slava 🇺🇦 .
The strong force is another version of gravity, holding protons close together. Having a large enough amount of protons produces a strong force large enough that it exists outside of the atom that you can access it and amplify. Element 115 has this needed amount of protons for this to happen, or so the theory goes by Bob Lazar. Hope that helps.
@@cyberneticinterfacemodular3996 I hate the word " rubbish" so UK
If I'm remembering correctly Bob called it the Gravity A force.
@@machinesandthings7121 No such thing Gravity A or B wave.Bob Lazar a pure fantasy liar well proven by many credited scientist and engineer like myself.Dr David Morgan summed lazar up in his well detailed data about him.Fantasy liar and deception artist who knows nothing about advanced physics especially thermo dynamics and fluid dynamics.A must for advanced physics engineers and scientist.Bob Lazar neither any of these.
The strong force is not gravity lol they are two completely different forces explained accurate by two seperate theories.
@@Jordan-vr7ip Sure remains so far.
This was interesting, I actually subscribed based off of one video.
Awesome! Thanks Michael! Great to have you with the channel!
Same, this video in fact!
Same
I also subscribed. Lol
There have been some advancements in technology that make me think it is not impossible what he is claiming. There are some new metal alloys that we produce today that are only possible after we started working in vacuum conditions. We call them super alloys. The first problem is to understand how the element 115 has produced and if it wasn't stable, maybe they need to be produced in a specific condition to be stable. Or perhaps they need to be grouped or aligned in a specific way to stabilize.
If Bob was really hired to work on the project S4 (which there is a lot of people trying to validate his educational background and other information) he did not have all the information about what he was trying to reverse-engineer. And reverse-engineering something doesn't give you all the details of how something works. It gives you an idea based on the observation of the object and the phenomena that it creates.
Going back to super alloys, if we get a part made by a super alloy and in some way we travel back in time 100 years. Then we give this part to a scientist of that time, when they probably only know about the materials of the periodic table of their time. Do they be able to analyze the part and explain how it was made? Most likely they will say that this super alloy is impossible to exist or synthesize.
So, it is difficult to explain something that we do not have the technology to reproduce.
I KNEW there was someone out there that could try and theorise how element 115 could work nice one mate 👍
Who?
@@vickyp7345 this guy
The best ufo or uap documentary I think at the moment is “the phenomenon”. In my opinion it’s by far the most interesting based on the people on there
The Zimbabwe school kids story baffles me. So many witnesses that day who say similar things and it seemed to have a profound effect on them.
This was great! It’s fascinating to think that, due to our sun, we may not have some elements present in other star systems.
makes complete sense, vitamin deprived also
That should be common sense? Also Bob is a fraud should also be common sense but we live in the age of easily accessible disinformation and scam artists.
Adding some thoughts to your thought exercise and more questions (1 year later):
8:08. No wires: We can make "chips" and "electronic plates" part of the structural frame. It apparently seems to have no wire because all wiring is "in-bedded" in the structure + the wireless devices you already commented.
13:52. Recent discovery (WEBB telescope) may suggest that there were galaxies much earlier than theory predicted.
What would (all in the conditional, obviously) that mean: 1. Maybe the universe is older? 2. Maybe 90% of the "unknown universe" (dark matter/energy) - influenced by gravity but doesn't bounce EMW (photons) - has some effect on what we observed so far and made the theory of a 13.77 billion y.o universe, maybe a "little older"? 3. Could Mc115 (stable version?) be a sub-product of "dark matter"? 4. If the universe expand at faster than light "celerity" (it's possible because it can expand at a little bit more than 1/2.c then the combined expansion is faster than light) therefore there may exist an "invisible universe" (the part beyond the faster than light speed). I'm not sure if I'm clear enough...
17:56. Next time Mc115 is synthesized we have very little time to find out what is its spectroscopy signature (given it's not a "dark matter" sub-product... In that case, no spectroscopy possible, from what I understand), then try to find where MC115 is in enough quantity at the surface of a star or a planet. If it's in the Zeta Reticulae area, that would make some sense...!
19.01. I was told (according to A.Einstein) that gravity is not a force, but a "deformation" of the universe "fabric" (as a consequence of variations in density and/or speed), therefore we cannot count it as the 4th force (may the 4th be with you!)
21.29: I was told (S. Hawkings) that nothing can escape a black hole EXCEPT Information. Am I correct in my understanding?
26:49. It has been theorized that it could exist a particle responsible for mass (aka "gravitron"?), what if the stable MC115 would be "made" of more "gravitron" than other element (able to create a gravitational field)?
28:59. We have the ability to synthesize MC115 (unstable version). So, maybe, some day can we synthesize a stable version? Nothing is really impossible (from the observer PoV... ;) )
Perhaps element 115 isn’t a natural element anywhere but can be made in quantity (and stable) by an advanced civilization?
Is that like a strain of weed
damn man i LOVED this piece, cant get enough of this science! well done!
I am not a scientist but I spent 30 years working at a major research university. I worked with dozens of scientist as a technical resource in time of need. I know how they think and talk. I have heard nothing out of Mr Lazar's mouth that indicates he has any real knowledge beyond common everyday bits and pieces found in basic physics text books and UFO magazines. In my opinion, Mr Lazar's only real interest lays in pocketing money from media sources.
I spoke with Bob Lazar briefly 25 or so years ago buying an item from his company United Nuclear. Then I mentioned his UFO reports of 1989... He was adamant in that he did not want to talk about it. I either accept what he said as truth or not. He was not goting to talk about. As for him making money over it. NO WAY ! if anything it took money making ability from him. Now these videos put out of a disk craft that turns sideways. Look carefully at the haze around it. You can see three distortions in that haze. If anything this one video confirms what Bob Lazar claimed in 1989... A craft without wings, that leaves no exhaust, and a craft that apparently distorts gravity and travels at speeds unachievable by humanity. If so we are seeing that Bob Lazar was right and his story told in 1989, a story that has not changed since... Confirmed by these images taken by our military aircraft and leaked to the public.
Actually bob Lazar hasn't made any money from his story, in fact he has lost money when he lost his job, he's a real scientist and makes rocket cars and is a very smart man.
@@stevewhite6861 correct.
@@predator-gt5ip Thank you.
he did not make money with his story! neither he nor he wants to do it ;)
I dare Bob lazar to take a lie detector test. 100 % he'll fail
I agree. He didn't have a migraine headache on Rogans podcast, he was trying to come up with his answers. Buying time.
Lie detectors are a bigger fraud than Lazar himself.
Lazar did take a lie detector test 30 years ago and passed. The polygrapher Terry Tavernetti said he thinks Bob Lazar was being truthful.
Also the Joe rogan interview is 30 years after the events Lazar claimed happened, how much detail do you remember of anything from 30 years ago?
You wouldn't need seat belts. The craft controls the gravity all around the ship. It's how you could survive the G forces.
Exactly my thought. The passengers are subject to the gravity produced by the craft. It's not affected by inertia from an "external" gravity. The craft can move faster than the speed of light and the passengers won't feel a thing. If humans do get to discover how to make this technology happen, space travel will become reality. Maybe our solar system (unfortunately) didn't give us this element needed for that technology..
@@FallenRaven LHC🤔 atom smasher
and from what I remember from the Roswell accounts, those seats didn't have seat belts.
None of this applies if the phenomenon is actually interdimensional beings.
Are you sure? If one can bend the fabric of space/time, is it not possible to tear it open to reveal another dimension on the other side? Doesn't seem impossible to me, but what do I know?
We (the public) don't know much about the phenomena, so it's hard to say. Personally, I'm hoping they are from other star systems, because the universe is awfully huge and I'd love for humans to be able to explore it one day.
@@quantumac ...granted. But wishful thinking can jade logic.
@@quantumac Absolutely. It's almost terrifying how large our universe is. The idea that there might be multiple (if not unlimited) universes just on the other side of the door is mind melting. I'm just hoping that we get some disclosure before I die. I doubt it will happen with the current state of humanity but one can hope.
Argument from ignorance, teetering on God of the Gaps fallacy. Try again.
A nice thought “experiment” but a mention of the “Island of Stability” should also be inserted here:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability
Btw, we could have stable version(s) around but in such minute quantities that it is very hard to detect, especially since we we don’t really know it’s detectable properties.
This is interesting, thank you for sharing
Saw you're post today on UFO's and went back to watch what I missed before I found you. Interesting but I will reserve judgement till I see it! Keep up the good work, interesting
Thank you for saying you didn't like the documentary! The creepy weird music and silly narration and transitions irritated me, but all the comments on the video were fanboys gushing about it 🙄. It's nice to see brutal honesty!❤
I am so glad I have a teleporter, as these flying UFO devices are so complicated.
And I’m here stuck with my pos time machine 😩
Totally agree. Jeremy Corbin ruins the believability of anything he touches. That guy wants to believe soooo hard, he’s not objective.
But Bob Lazar is 1000% telling the truth.
This video was better than I thought it would be. Great job researching it.