FULL HIGHLIGHTS | Portland Thorns vs. Seattle Reign
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 พ.ค. 2024
- A Cascadia Clash as the Portland Thorns win their fifth match in a row with a 4-0 victory over the Seattle Reign. Goals from Olivia Moultrie, Sophia Smith, Hina Sugita and Payton Linnehan!
Watch every goal, every save live on ABC, ESPN, ESPN+, ESPN Deportes, Prime Video, ION, Paramount+, CBS Sports Network, CBS and NWSL+ this season! - กีฬา
Probably the best I've seen Portland play this season. Smith & Linehan have the potential to be one of the most deadliest combos in soccer. Coffey was phenomenal as always
Agree! And I thought Olivia played one of her best matches ever. Her touch is very good and her movement without the ball has improved immensely.
soph can play solo when chances come,or she can pass the ball to a open player.she is a gem of a soccer player.
Eh, she needs to work on seeing the open player better when in front of goal
Her first touch is damn near flawless
Womens sport has improved so much, Its literaly a joy to watch players like Sophia Smith
whenever smith has the ball she is actually unstoppable great game. highlights were... ok they got the players walking out but no linups
Fans in the 3rd tier??!! Portland showed up! Love to see the support. Great game- this will forever be one of my favorite rivalries!
The announced attendance was 20,223 fwiw. I think there were more fans at the Thorns game on a Saturday night than there were for the Timbers vs Sounders game on Sunday afternoon.
@@HurrikanEagle Attendance I saw for the Sounders/Timbers the past Sunday was 25,218.
@@clipcoug1139 it must have just been the camera angle when I watched it on TV then.
Reing did not play bad today, all teams are creating chances; the difference is: you have to score goals, you have to put aways your chances. Reing had plenty of chances and could not put them away. When the Thorns put away their chances (score goals), the heart of the Reign's player sank.
I want to emphasize something that I like about a player. Sofia Smith is a good individualist player (her tendency), But today she was passing the ball (teamwork). Did it work?_just look at the result: a win, they won.
As the league becomes more professional; the player also will evolve and will overcome "the solo hero mentality" they were taught in college.
Good for Sofia, she has added another dimension to her game: keep it up...The same goes for Rodman, Swanson and company.
you mean the ooover hyped players swanson & rodman?.
@@maharajkumarswamidoss845 no
Lineups!?!?!?
Haha right?! I feel spoiled
I guess the Thorns are not looking for a coach anymore!
Sophia Smith❤
que pasa con huitema la centro delantera de canada que jugaba en el o`reing
Exactly, hit the ball law and to the corners. Is not elegant but effective.
Apesar do pênalti mal marcado, portland jogou muito bem.
despise of the bad penalty, Portland played very well.
❤
Ontem ouve um pênalti,ais claro que esse par o Chelsea contra o Manchester United, o o juizao não deu toque na mão tbm
go Thorns
Was there an injury? Why so much added time?
Seattle goalie sat down beginning of he half for some reason. VAR review was very long. And officiating was Sh!t. So yeah.
One person on eat side took a knee just to get people reset. But mostly it was just the Forever VAR. I was making jokes after the game that "some say the Ref is still looking at the VAR" because he was there for THAT long.
@@HurrikanEagle I was imagining he was pretending he was analyzing the play, but in actuality waiting while the VAR official was looked up the rule on hand ball/leg deflections for him...
When I saw "13" go up for stoppage, I thought: 1) that's cruel - you're asking this team to try and compete for that much longer, and 2) Seems a bit excessive for the time that was actually stopped in the 2nd half. A lot of fun seeing Seattle get beat that way in the end, and I didn't realize Soph had all three assists. Way to be!!!
The highlights didn't necessarily capture just how long it felt the Ref was at the VAR station for the handball. But also in the stands, we were all like "13 minutes? Really, that feels insane"
That penalty call was ridiculous. It bounced off her leg first.
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. I don't think she was making herself unnaturally bigger, it was consequence of her body movement.
The laws have changed recently such that deflections off of the player’s body don’t automatically exclude handling. This was the correct call, as she put her arm out in front of the path of the ball. If the shot had been higher and hit Huerta’s arm directly, this would have been an easy DOGSO red card.
I'll take "How to get a ton of comments from people who don't understand the handball rule" for 1000, Alex 👋🏻⚽
Bottom line is, Huerta could have had her arm tucked in or behind her back. The rules say if your arm is where it doesn't _need_ to be, you run the risk of a handball.
지소연 화이팅😊
What football regulations are applied in the United States? Normally there is no penalty for this action.
Follow NWSL on TH-cam for more highlights!
absurd penalty decision - "Handling the ball
For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit. Not every touch of a player’s hand/arm with the ball is an offence.
It is an offence if a player:
deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, for example moving the hand/arm towards the ball
touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised"
So weird that you quote the rule as if it supports you. Huerta's arm is away from her body and didn't have to be. She could have tucked it behind her. *"By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised."* That's what happened! She fucked around and found out.
5:03 What a shambolic decision here ! VAR overrides the central referee ?!? How is this rewarding good football ? The attacker is not in on goal. They beg for a call instead of playing to the whistle. The defender makes the stop with the foot. Involuntary ricochet / deflection from leg to arm is not handball !! The referee had a good view of it and made the correct choice to let the play continue. Even the attacking squad was not convinced and did not argue for a penalty. And here comes the VAR, takes 3 solid minutes off the clock, killing all the momentum of the game and awarding a penalty based on a new, completely made-up version of soccer rules ! Portland was the better team, they did not need this kind of gifts to spoil their merit in the victory.
Handling rules have changed recently. Please look them up. A deflection off the player doesn’t exclude handling anymore.
There should be no handball if the ball hits another part of the body first. It's absolutely a crazy wrong rule, IMO.
The Laws for handling changed in the last couple of years. You might be thinking of the old rules. Deflection off the player’s body is no longer automatically not handling.
Have to disagree with the handball. The arm was not extended in an unnatural position in my opinion.
Hard to believe that ref took four minutes of review to rule a handball. It's like he was hoping he'd see something different, but it just kept hitting her forearm. After four minutes, he's like "alright fine. Thorns get a penalty." And then Seattle whined and whined like they'd been hard done. 🙄
He was trying to see if it hit her leg first. It didn't, but there's nothing wrong with checking all the angles.
It did hit her leg first, but with the current handling rules that doesn’t exclude handling.
@@DukeTrout Did they change again? Last I checked, if it hit a legal body part first, it wasn't handball unless it was intentional.
Also, I saw those replays, and I'm still not sure if it hit her thigh.
@@davidt3956 The previous rules included the wording that said that deflections off the same player meant that an immediately subsequent contact with hand or arm was not handling. This was a problematic rule, because it meant even deliberate handling after deflection wouldn’t be ruled as such. The hypothetical extreme would be if I, as a defender in the box, had the ball deflect off my leg, I could grab it and run all the way downfield carrying the ball and throw it in the opposing net for a goal, rules-as-written. So it’s a good thing that wording is gone, in my opinion.
@@DukeTrout They are all problematic. There's always interpretation allowed and, no, that theory would never have been allowed.
Will these over excited male coaches ever learn. Very unprofessional with the hold and lifting a female player up.
I was thinking the same thing ….
I mean, it looked like Kling initiated it, no inappropriate contact was made.
@@landryharrell7 Can you imagine touching (taekwondo black belt) Megan Klingenberg without her consent?
que pasa con huitema la centro delantera de canada que jugaba en el o`reing