hey Prof, took your class two years ago. wasn't a big talker during the COVID era unfortunately. occasionally refer to the math 318 series notes/lectures when i need a refresher. glad to see you back!
This helps me so much! My teacher considers these sections review from the last linear algebra class, but the content is so different, I was totally lost self-teaching. Thanks so much for making these, you are my life-saver
Thanks for this. A life scientist here self learning mathematics. I’ve done Calc 1 and 2 and discrete math. I know a bit about matrices, haven’t done linear algebra before but using this textbook. Fingers crossed that my knowledge will carry me through to inner products.
I appreciate the effort you go to to bridge the concepts from traditional linear algebra to the more abstract approach. I do find the comment that the ability to differentiate between vectors and scalers is a matter of maturity and doesn't require any typographical convention disingenuous. Printing vectors in bold type would have improved Axler's textbook and his refusal to do so just smacks of arrogance, not surprising considering the books title.
Hi Professor Won, thank you for posting this valuable series, would just taking your mathematical reasoning before this course be enough? Do I need to learn anything else beforehand? Thank you very much!
I believe that just mathematical reasoning is enough, although in the course, I assume that students have had a first course in linear algebra (which is done computationally rather than rigorously). All of the results in this course are proved from the ground up, but naturally it is easier to learn something a second time than a first time!
An ability with basic logic and mathematical proof techniques is definitely necessary. I have a course on mathematical reasoning on this channel also. Intro linear algebra is helpful but not technically necessary.
![ตีสิบเดย์ [FULL] | เปิดใจ "อาจารย์ เบียร์ ฅนตื่นธรรม" นักสนทนาธรรมสายดุดัน!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vqaBI_mnoDk/mqdefault.jpg)
hey Prof, took your class two years ago. wasn't a big talker during the COVID era unfortunately. occasionally refer to the math 318 series notes/lectures when i need a refresher. glad to see you back!
Awesome! Glad to hear from you and also glad to hear that you’re still finding linear algebra useful in your life
Currently taking an linear algebra class using this book. All of your videos are super helpful.
I'm glad they're helpful! Having more than one perspective when learning any subject is very powerful
This helps me so much! My teacher considers these sections review from the last linear algebra class, but the content is so different, I was totally lost self-teaching. Thanks so much for making these, you are my life-saver
Thanks for this. A life scientist here self learning mathematics. I’ve done Calc 1 and 2 and discrete math. I know a bit about matrices, haven’t done linear algebra before but using this textbook. Fingers crossed that my knowledge will carry me through to inner products.
Thanks! I loved your LA series. I'm about to watch it a second time. Cool that you posted your problem sets too.
Thanks for watching (then and now)! Always good to have more linear algebra knowledge in the world!
Super excited for the series!
You're just amazing professor! Just watched this first lecture and Im so excited! Please keep making such video lectures. Thanks a lot professor
I appreciate the effort you go to to bridge the concepts from traditional linear algebra to the more abstract approach. I do find the comment that the ability to differentiate between vectors and scalers is a matter of maturity and doesn't require any typographical convention disingenuous. Printing vectors in bold type would have improved Axler's textbook and his refusal to do so just smacks of arrogance, not surprising considering the books title.
Hi Professor Won, thank you for posting this valuable series, would just taking your mathematical reasoning before this course be enough? Do I need to learn anything else beforehand? Thank you very much!
I believe that just mathematical reasoning is enough, although in the course, I assume that students have had a first course in linear algebra (which is done computationally rather than rigorously). All of the results in this course are proved from the ground up, but naturally it is easier to learn something a second time than a first time!
pls keep doing this series prof!
making life simpler thank you 😀
Great, Thank you, prof Won!!
Thank you sir for providing these videos...What should I study first as a prerequisite to this course?
An ability with basic logic and mathematical proof techniques is definitely necessary. I have a course on mathematical reasoning on this channel also. Intro linear algebra is helpful but not technically necessary.
That's awesome man thanks! You're the best!
Thank you so much. ❤❤❤
I love you this is awesome
Hi professor. It would be very helpful if you could make videos for chapter 7 and 8 as well in your free time. Thankss.
That may happen in the future! At the moment free time is limited, but I am trying to update these courses where helpful
wow!!
I know you've been waiting for a long time for this first lecture.