SUBSCRIBE so you don’t miss our upcoming episodes: - I Tried Air Traffic Control - I Tried Getting A Black Belt in 90 Days - I Tried Hostage Negotiation - I Tried Formula 1
@@MichelleKhare did you know it only takes 100 nuclear weapons to cause a nuclear winter that would destroy civilization as we know it? Your choice was terrible.
Props to the actors they did very well.The way they acted and the video is edited makes this video very scary and the music too. Soo props to the people that were in this video and that worked on the video
If any of her editors is reading. You guys NAILED IT!!, literally im just talking talking in my room alone while watching shouting LARGE SCALLEEE!!, MICHELLLE DO SOMETHING!!! Hats off
@@Greyboi604☺️👍 I understand, thank you very much for happily explaining this unknown scenario to my senses so it could be sent to my brain, and be fashionably processed and completely understood. thanks for assisting me here, this is a very factual message. I will make sure that what you have recently used your device for slash sending this very factual message, is sent out and spread across the chats that this comment will eventually host! I hope you have a good sun time and have a good fun life.
I live in Hawaii. A few years ago we had an emergency notification on cell phones and broadcast on air that nuclear missiles were on the way to Hawaii, I assumed from N. Korea. It ended up being a false alarm that some poor guy accidentally set off, but for about fifteen minutes we thought we were going to get hit by a nuclear bomb. We were looking up nuclear fallout, scale of mushroom cloud, wind direction, where to shelter underground, how to survive a nuclear blast… we called our loved ones and said goodbye. It was the scariest fifteen minutes of my life.
This was so intense, props to all the actors around the table for making the situation so much more immersive and really hammering how stressful this would really be
Not just that but in this sim they already launched missles and 50 million or something are gonna die anyway shit send missles back and destroy them lol war over
Thats probably worst decision you could make, sending the entire world into a nuclear winter even if it's only 2 countries at nuclear war, convential or peaceful response would be best, even if your country dies you would atleast save the world
As a military officer I can say that these simulations are way more stressful than they seem. When you're in the role, you actually have limited time to make decisions while pondering every potential consequence. It's difficult, but you do learn a lot. Great video.
@@taoist32 Pretty much the same as any previous administration would've been. Pacifism and Humanism die when the nukes fly. That's the big lesson you can take from this video.
This is why we do drills and go over most scenarios over and over so that even something like this is muscle memory. Coming from a ballistic missile submariner.
Richard Feynman once said that the thing that impressed him most about a general was his ability to stare out of a window for a few minutes and make a decisive decision.
My decision would be to do nothing. There is nothing you can do. The nukes are going to land no matter what you do. I would never inform the public. There is no point in causing the last few minutes of their lives to be distraught. Responding to such an attack would be that of the attackers. The outcome of the attack would be the support of the people once you go on the news to explain the loss of the people, the question should be why did they attack us in the first place.
This simulation is quite literally a nightmare scenario. There is absence of information due to the fog of war, and trying to get more information takes up time you don't have, giving you absence of action. It's very cruel, and terrifying to think that this could potentially happen
I'd say it's an unrealistic setup. Any president or decision maker in that position would at the very least have a deep understanding of their own militaries capabilities and have some established doctrine around how to respond. Their would also be longer lead up that would provide context to diplomatic situation around the conflict. Countries don't just randomly start slinging nukes at each others population centers. You'd have a lead up that would be months if not years in the making.
@@chriskerwin3904 yes, It's unrealistic that way, though it completes the objective of understanding the average person's decision making skills under stress with very high pressure. Though in reality, once any type of shady business starts a behind the scene plan will also start (more so, defense and offense planning in case of emergencies)
Imagine this but at space scales. The game theory prevents some of the necessary communication at all due to the speed of light, so decisions have to be made in the absence of information about the threat.
May be true but the point of a nuclear deterrent is that it's existance is so it's never fired. Nobody wants to pay billions of pounds or dollars a year for a system a scared leader won't use evemif
He wasn't even the only one, I believe there was also someone who refused an order to launch nuclear missiles. Nuclear war was averted several times by Soviet individuals keeping their heads cold.
If it hasn't been mentioned already, there is a movie called "Fail Safe" originally from 1964 although a live remake was done in 2000 with George Clooney. Not to give too much spoilers for those who hasn't seen the movie, this simulation reminded me strongly of that movie. One minor disagreement that I have with the video is that there was the "Able Archer 83" incident in which also led the world very close to a nuclear confrontation.
This needs to be a mandatory public test for all potential presidential candidates, but also for all nation leaders for other leaders to understand but also for those voting them into power to understand who they are working with. This was such a good video to watch!
@renzowessels505 that's a very surface level cause effect child like thinking. Push yourself to answer your own question as you evidently have never been a leader before. And if you have you would do better with some training and a mentor.
What other rights would also require a mandatory test to enjoy? Running for office is linked to one's right to vote, so requiring a test now restricts that right as well. So, do we have an assembly right test? Association right test? A free press right test? Religion test? Freedom from warrantless search and seizure test? The test is the campaign, now if the citizenry fails to ask the correct questions and demand answers, the citizenry itself has failed the test.
@@renzowessels505 funny, Japan thought that before Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Totally useless, why train in such a scenario, leading to a blunted response to the bombings.
@@dgrano20 Could you explain your thoughtways please. I don't think it's childish to say that its not very helpfull for every country besides the US to run a US based simulation. If other ountries want to do something like this, then they should make their own simulations based on their country's geopolitical situation.
That was unbelievably intense. Even knowing you are in a simulation, the overwhelming magnitude of your decision in that moment is almost impossible for any one person to bear, so all thoughts of this "this is just hypothetical" seemed to just disappear. And all the credit for it seeming so real is due to the actors who ran it. They really were incredible! I just hope that the world continues to see, through stuff like this, that there is no winning, for anyone, in nuclear conflicts. Amazing video, Michelle!!!!
You know what stuck with me? The moment she pushed the button and after that I felt a feeling of emptiness. OK I gave the order now what? She asked said: "Thats it??".
If you haven't ordered the retaliation strike at least 5 minutes before the first wave strikes, you've waited too long. It isn't like the cold war anymore where we have bombers on alert standing by with live nuclear warheads and it takes a few minutes for a land-based launch control facility to go through the protocols to activate an ICBM launch.
What a great episode. This sheds light on something that most people don't ever get to wonder, the weigh of your decision. Obama wrote this : "So, I ran a tight process. I trusted my team. I listened to every voice in the room. I gave myself space to think. And then I made a decision that reflected my own personal sense of what was right. While I couldn’t guarantee the outcome, I was confident in making the decision."
Such a polar opposite of the man who succeeded him 😔. "I know everything better than the experts, and if anyone tries to argue with me I tell them to shut up".
With all the glorious but otherwise empty words he till deemed an ineffective present. The lesson is don't believe in bullshits. True character only shows in actions.
@@higgy82 She still made the decision to do a large scale attack, but that statement showed us she didn't do it heartlessly and full of spite, generalizing a whole civilization based on their leaders. she still had compassion toward millions of innocent human lives being lost. I can respect that
@@higgy82 it also hinted to hoping for an option to just take out THOSE GUYS, the guilty ones who actually committed the attack against us, without having to turn into "those guys" who nuked MILLIONS of innocent
It also shows that she wants an option to just get THOSE GUYS who actually did the deed against millions of innocent, without having to become “those guys” ourselves
@@iany254yeah you do but in case of an worldwide nuclear escalation/war the world would cool down for many years and that would affect the whole world. There is actually historic event in relation to this. In 1815 Mount Tambora erupted and due to the debris cloud, the world cooled down bei 0,5 degress celcius, for example in north america all crops died, it snowed in New York in June. The whole Thing was the worst famine in the 19th century And that was only one (big) volcano.
@@b0k193 you can see tears running down Michelles face mate. she's def feeling a pressure, just maybe not 100% of what the president would. I dont think you get how easy it is to trick the brain a situation is real, just takes good actors who play along with a delusion that becomes more and more real.
That was my largest decision point, as at that point, they were engaging our conventional forces and population centers. Large, to neutralize their military capabilities. Meanwhile, our nuclear armed allies would automatically launch on warning of the attack upon us, per their treaty obligations. Why do you think Putin hates NATO so much?
1. Alert everyone in the affected zones. 2. Confirm that it is, in fact, a real attack. 3. Hear the options. Pick the one that cripples their military the most. Looks better, even marginally, to the global population. 4. Head to the Winchester for an ice-cold pint and wait for it all to blow over.
I love these "challenge accepted" videos. Always garanteed quality entertainment. I know it´s easy to sit behind the screen and post a comment. But I think I would choose the large scale nuclear answer as well.
Fun Fact Michelle: There is a video called "Coldline" and it is similar to the simulation that you did in this video, the game takes place in the height of the Cold War and a Nuclear Missile is heading towards New York City and you are the Chairman of the USSR and you are tasked with stopping the nuclear warhead from reaching New York, and stopping Nuclear Armageddon, and you have a red phone and have to try to contact the President to intercept the Missile. Note: This is not sponsored this is just something I just wanted to Bring up.
I grew up at a Manhattan Project nuclear site. It created plutonium for the Trinity test and the bomb dropped on Nagasaki. Watching this took me straight back to my childhood. We knew we were a target, we wore dog tags as kids, no duck and cover drills at our schools. We knew we were going to die. Every large building in our town was a fallout shelter. As kids, 5-6 years old, we knew where they all were and how many minutes it would take to get there. Ty for doing this video. I think the younger generation doesn’t see the impossible choices and consequences faced by a president. Being a 3rd generation nuclear worker made me proud bc I felt like I was helping to fight communism and keeping Americans safe. I feel like I did the right thing at the time. Ty Michelle!❤❤❤
Curious thing there is someone from the other side of the world who thinks exactly the same but change communist for americans, and both believe be the good guy
It's amazing (awful, but amazing) to hear that perspective. I've always had a weird concern for nuclear warfare even though I've never experienced the fallout (not a pun, I just can't think of a better term) of the warfare itself. Living along a coastline, I've often thought about what we would do and we don't know because it's not thought of much. It's hard to imagine that your understanding of where/how long to to to the bunks was, is equivalent to an arcade in the '00s or a club nowadays. I don't usually post political opinions but with this being more real than ever, there's only one person I want in that chair..
@@javierpdayou’re exactly right. The average person wants what’s best for their country, family, friends, etc. No one ever thinks they’re a bad guy. That’s what makes growing up the way I did so conflicted.
Growing up in the Cold War, having read A LOT of Tom Clancy, and having watched Wargames multiple times, this is something right up my alley. And yeah, tensions were high in 1962 (Cuba), but the introduction of BMEWS in 1961, created a close call and I believe the Russians had a close call as well.
Large scale was the option as soon as they gave me the options. It took just 10 seconds… it is what it is. It wasn’t about me or my emotions, it was just what was best (or least worst) for my people.
The very fact that we are on the cusp of this type of situation is bone chilling . I am so proud of Michelle, showing us some of what the government does a lot of this kind of stuff is hidden a civilians and I feel like we have the right to know so kudos to her for bringing some of the stuff to light!!!
@@darriendove8380 If nothing else, this episode needs to be submitted to an Emmy category, like "Outstanding Short Form Comedy, Drama Or Variety Series." That a TH-cam series hired legitimate actors, that they didn't break character, that they knew what to reply from their role's point of view, all the while dealing with someone stressing out about the ethics, not just playing it like a video game as many would do, that's really, really, really uncommon. It's playing out in real time, too, on a platform where either you shoot a ton and cut a ton, or you just post something overly long. This is the perfect length for the scenario presented.
Man I truely love your videos and how you highlight the things a majority of us wouldn’t even have a chance to experience or even think about. This video here cut deep for me cause it’s like dang what would I do. The response. The decision making. Pray for our leadership, and thank you for your channel and how you utilize your platform.
You've got a half dozen options on how to do so or even not shoot back at all. Meanwhile, allies have already launched their arsenals, as is required by our mutual defense treaties. I'd be assessing between small and large right until our conventional naval forces were engaged, at that point, they're at a full military degradation attack posture, so it's large to eliminate their capability to attack further or ever again. Real world, they'd detect my counterattack and launch everything that they could. There aint' gonna be any winners, just survivors. But then, I started my military career in tactical nukes.
this has me in tears and riddled with anxiety. this video was really well made and beautifully captures the reality that such a position of power holds in its responsibility and duty to millions, if not billions. I knew something like this was stressful but this really drove that stress factor deep inside of me as i struggled to think of how i would have responded.
I have 3 things to add: 1) Kobayashi Maru 2) “In the nuclear age, war itself is the enemy.” (Denzel Washington in Crimson Tide) 3) “What a curious game. The only way to win seems to be to not play.” (WarGames) As soon as the naval assets were hit, there was no going back as this was confirmation of an attack.
Worse, hitting naval assets, which are conventional, as our surface fleet are all conventionally armed now, also speaks to their strategy to eliminate our military capabilities. So, it defaults to large response to eliminate their military capabilities.
Watching this video, also stressed me out hearing everything. This was a tearjerker, like a movie with no good ending at all. I’m really glad youtube recommended this to me, it was 100% worth it. May we never use these weapons forever.
@@lamsmiley1944 it is but by taking too long to make a decision can lead to more of their people dying. When they do something is perhaps more important than what they do. There is a big difference between weighing up the consequences of your actions and being indecisive or having a breakdown. In the last minute or so she wasted lots of time effectively stalling pushing the button and that was very unproductive, that wasn’t reasoning or weighing up the consequences, that was just time wasting because she didn’t want to do it.
@@conorstewart2214 it’s vital that you take as much time as possible to verify the validity of the threat. There has been multiple false alarms that if acted upon straight away would have resulted in nuclear war.
@@lamsmiley1944 yes thats true, but not the way she went about it. The second she heard option 2# she shouldve gone for ir. Option one is automatic no, why tf attack civilians just cause. (in option 2 is different cause they're collateral, we're not tryna kill them we tryna disable their military). Option 3, never, they're killing our people, i'd rather die fighting than pleading. Samething for option 4, we're not gonna do nothing. The faster we respond back the better chance we got at stopping more lifes lost, so its important to take the decisions in a snap
@taoist32 Let me just say this, who had wars continue throughout their term? Who resolved and prevented wars during their term? Who had better strategies and got things done as far as military and protecting those in our country?
Biden wouldn't even know what's going on in his state. Honestly, they would probably bypass his decision. Can't let someone with dementia make life altering decisions.
oh god i love you michelle when you said i dont want either of these options and how it was so ridiculous thats exactly what i was thinking... id be furious if that was the best they could come up with....in my honest belief violence only begets more violence and i would do the non attack response, for the moment because whether americans die or not it wasnt by your hand and if there is no prevention of their deaths than killing more people would be pointless and foolish... but if the enemy continued i would do the military non nuclear option as a "i had no other alternative"... you are such a smart woman and im so glad people like you exist!!
Don’t read if you don’t want a spoiler to the end of Enders Game. Good movie better book Kind of Reminds me of Enders Game. At the end the only option was to sacrifice everything/everyone and kill the queen to stop the threat
clearly not because that's the option everyone chooses. Targeting population centers is a non-starter for most and once the conventional response is taken off the table, there's simply no other choice.
The fact that this made me emotional and felt real says something about this simulation. This would be genuinely terrifying to encounter if this were to really happen honestly, let's just hope this never happens at all.
This is what would never happen… Sure the acting is good but the enemy would not be targeting cities first the first wave of nuclear missles (from both sides) would be targeting the others nuclear assets (silos, naval bases, air bases, mobile launching vehicles etc…) so their is actually not as much deaths as they say within that short time period. Even Russia and china today don’t want to kill everyone they just want to take out the power (millitary and government) of the USA and other NATO members. Then their is the SSBNs wich are nuclear submarines that can go anywhere in the world, undetected, then Launch their missiles then their are multiple launch profiles… blah blah blah. Just keep in kids this is not what would happen
Michelle, this is, by far, one of your top 3 challenges. Goosebumps all the way through. Just like your 911 Operator challenge, they both created a lot of emotion and a lump in my throat. You never cease to amaze me.
iis it weird to say that 4.6m subscribers feels way too low for the quality of michelles videos? these are on par with the best of the best dude, she should have so much more recognition!
I'm shaking to make a decision, and this is through a third pov. Imagine you are in the situation room facing information from multiple angles, to determine which is reliable and which is not, to listen to opinions not only from your allies but also from the enemy in question. No decision will be the right decision here. We can only look back, after all is over and we have the luxury to do so, and judge whether that was a "good" choice or not.
If it makes you feel better then this is likely not all that realistic. Most of the questions she asked during this was information that the president would be expected to know beforehand and know in more detail. For example the president would know the response options and probably already has responses planned out for the most likely scenarios. I wouldn’t look into this too deeply, I would see this as good to get you thinking but not as all that realistic.
@@conorstewart2214 I agree with you. The president would already be aware of the response choices available for a particular adversary launching against us like that. It would be more a matter of conforming the threat is real and responding in a manner as already discussed in prior scenario-based discussions.
Dear Michelle, with all due respect, A large-scale nuclear attack on an opposing country's military could be seen as strategically beneficial for those seeking to swiftly cripple the enemy's defense capabilities, potentially leading to a faster end to conflict. By targeting military assets, the aggressor might aim to prevent prolonged warfare, which could otherwise result in even greater loss of life over time. Despite the tragic loss of lives, such an attack could be argued as a means to achieve a decisive victory, thereby minimizing future casualties and establishing long-term security. Even though it seems inhumane, the OTHER country has done so already, meaning THERE IS NO RIGHT OPTION ANYMORE. All in all- by wasting time, you just constrained yourself to the remaining time you had, as you had mentioned before it felt like you were backing yourself into a corner.😮💨 Your choice was a phenomenal decision, in my eyes, THE BEST DECISION. Keep posting content, its amazing, to come back and see your videos. P.S. Vasili Alexandrovich Arkhipov is a true hero ❤ Most of us would not be born if he said Y . E . S.
I understand your reasoning, and I think thats why Michelle decided to go with that option aswell. But you go and say that "Vasili Alexandrovich Arkhipov is a true hero", when he, in the exact same situation in his eyes as Michelle was given at the start, decided NOT to fight back, not to target civil nor military assets. In your eyes, by your reasoning, in Vasili's shoes, you would've caused most of us to "not had been born", ever; because you would've said Y. E. S. It's not my intention to confront you in any way, just thought it was an interesting dilemma, which highlights the point of the video. NO, full force response was not the best decision; not in Vasili's shoes. Thats why he is a true hero.
Besides, all your doing with a small-scale countervalue attack is nuking 10s of millions of innocent civilians to make a statement without even eliminating the threat. Perversely, eliminated military assets with counterstrike nukes, risking 100s of millions of civilians being collateral damage, becomes the least worse option. It's all truly MAD.
I love the Madam President desk sign. It’s a nice touch. Michelle as usual you guys did totally amazing. Also hanging up on the ambassador was the best part. Michelle, one of my favorite things about you as a person is how personal you get in these videos. Sometimes there is no right or easy answer and sadly way too many do not understand this fact of life. I thank you so much for your videos, especially ones like this video. There is a move called War Games that came out in the 80’s and was remade years later but it taught a similar lesson that you did. In this situation there absolutely is no right answer; there is no correct response for a situation like this.
I've noticed some copycats doing the same type of content as Michelle. Joe Blow tries Marine boot camp or whatever. Nobody does it like Michelle though. What a badass
Marine bootcamp is NOT an original concept. It has been done many times, and it'll keep being done. They aren't copycats, they're merely using a known formula, just like Michelle.
@@modelotimefooooo1853 She's the most entertaining because she manufactures drama & situations to fit the heroe's journey. A lot of it is real, but a lot of it is also fake. I like her videos when they aren't so fake that it completely takes me out. Her "I Tried Treasure Hunting" video is one such example: there was no way to suspend disbelief on that one. To be fair, that's the youtube formula, it's what she's supposed to do, and videos can get boring if you limit yourself to what's actually happening organically. I just don't want to notice it too much :p And well, her production value is top-notch.
I don't care what any other TH-camr does. Michelle is without a doubt TH-cams dare devil. She is the first and, in my eyes the only one that does videos like this. I have been watching Michelle for a few years now and she does these videos justice. One, she is female, and most females wouldn't think of doing such videos. Two, because she is female, she does videos like the ones that she does. The videos challenge her to do or try to do the very best that she can.
Great actors! And it emphasises why this must be trained in advance. If that scenario was real, then this decision is too important to waste ANY second on "this all feels wrong" or "I'm overwhelmed". Also... what about a blackmail option as in "Fire enough to annihilate that entire country. We will stop our missiles if they stop theirs"
The scenario is really simplified and in regards to actual nuclear strategy and response options. Their "small scale" is actually known as counter-value strikes (cities, infrastructure, industry) and their "large scale" is actually called counter-force (strictly military, with emphasis on nuclear assets.) They are not mutually exclusive in reality. Pre-set response plans called SIOPs exist for a spectrum of mixing the two and it is also an option to go counter-force first and escalate (or retaliate) using gradual or full send counter value, after seeing what the enemy targeting was. There's also the strategy of which weapons to employ and when - for example you likely lose 90% of your silo based missiles when the timer hits zero so they are use it or lose it, before the incoming strike impacts. But your submarines can be held for a second strike. My response would be: 1. All bombers scramble instantly upon warning. 1 second into the scenario, i want my bombers loaded and safely up off the ground ASAP. They can always be recalled. 2. Immediate counter force launch with all ground based missiles the instant it is confirmed the Navy was struck. That's the absolutely sure act of war line. Arguably the EMP could be, but the advisors did not seem to have 100% confidence that was enemy action. Bombers released to proceed to targets. 3. Absorb the incoming strike, see what was hit. And respond accordingly... - If the enemy only targeted military assets, order bombers to strike surviving enemy military assets and if no more viable strategic targets, re task for tactical strikes on any enemy mobile forces (fleets or armies.) Stand down submarines, go deep and quiet. These are my reserve deterrence against further enemy nuclear strikes, or escalation to counter value targeting our cities and long term, deterrence against OUTSIDE interference while the country is down and rebuilding. Conventional forces. Finish the fight with conventional forces. - If the enemy strike was counter value aimed and our cities are gone, order bombers and submarines to launch a full counter value retaliation and annihilate the enemy economic potential. Including its draft and labor pool. Hold at least two loaded subs in reserve for aforementioned outside deterrence. Conventional forces disperse and withdraw home. Nothing left to conquer and we need the organized forces for homeland disaster relief.
This is the correct response. The average Canadian and American citizen do not have the knowledge of US or NATO military forces or Stratcom SIOP options. As a layman, I have studied over the years US and Russian military and strategic nuclear forces C3 systems and assets by reading open-source research/books and intelligence. This nuclear war scenario which takes place over 10 minutes would be incredibly stressful and emotional. Even i would have trouble navigating this scenario. However, given this situation once a launch is detected and you know that 2-300 nuclear warheads are incoming you are looking at a "LOW" launch on Warning situation like what was seen in the 1983 movie "The Day After " That means: 1) Ensuring the survival of the nuclear TRIAD by: A) Informing Stratcom to scramble the B52, B2 and modified B1B bombers to scramble immediately to fail safe points and or alternate airfields in the first second. 2) Send orders to Deployed USN Subs to target enemy military facilities via TACMO planes. 3) Immediately deploy remaining Trident Subs from US bases to pre assigned locations. 4) Launch your 44 ABM missiles plusUS Army Air defence artillery THAAD and tell US Navy Pacific Command to send orders to the guided missile cruisers and destroyers to launch the SA-6 ABM hypersonic missiles to stop enemy warheads. 5) Disperse all Continental US military forces 5) Activate the nationwide Emergency Alert System (EAS) 6) Activate the Civil Defense System. 7) launch Minuteman III missiles with 8 MIRV containing W-88 300-400 kt thermonuclear warheads for a massive EMP strike. I would launch 25-50 missiles immediately. 8) Evaluate the conventional or significant Nuclear Strike option. 9) However, once the US missile early warning system confirms EMP detonation at the 200-300 miles above the US. Then 10) You enact the Significant Nuclear Strike option which will kill 100-140 million people and cripple their secondary strike capabilities. This should take 2 out the 10 minutes. The President can leave the Situation Room for Andrew's AFB for Air Force 1 at this point. When the ambassador called you inform him of what we know and that the US of America has responded in order to determine future aggressions. When the Secretary of Defence informs the President that the US Navy has been attacked then you order your conventional forces to attack the enemy. At this point in the 6.22 time index, there is nothing to do but leave for Andrews AFB for Air Force 1 to leave Washington for safety. My last point is I had to read your response and I had to think of mine. However, one point that was missing in the scenario ( and something I did not think about) is that nuclear missiles after their boost stage 10 min out from impact can't be recalled. That means YOU DONT HAVE TIME to delay your response and its too late to negotiate with the enemy. If the scenario took place over 1 hour the response and options would be different and far more realistic.. You have to ensure the survival of the country and military forces. Its difficult to make the decision to kill 140 million of the enemy citizens, but the President of the US of America has the responsibility to make these decisions using logic, critical thinking, an understanding of you military forces and deployment and emotional consequences
Part II- In my comments I think that when the Ambassador of Veloria call at 4:12 to speak to the President it was a delay tactic. Negotiations at this point was impossible. My last point is that when the US Navy is attacked in the Pacific at 2:28 the "Launch On Warning " option effectiveness is seriously diminished so the actress took too long to make a decision to enact the significant nuclear strike option.
The only thing I would've said to the Ambassador is "We have detected numerous nuclear launches and we are preparing a response. Unless you can provide me immediate proof that no such launches have taken place, we have nothing to discuss." Personally, I would have begun mobilizing all armed forces, told civilians to seek immediate shelter, ready all reserve units, and immediately begin preparing for Option 2 (Large Nuclear Strike). You can't finesse a nuclear exchange, once one of them goes, they ALL go. That's WHY no one wants to use them, that's WHY we still have them.
@@brainthesizeofplanet It’s also why there’s direct lines of communication to the Russian Head of State for this exact reason. No arguing with an ambassador, get Putin on the damn phone 😂😂
Counterpoint - Stanislav Petrov. Of course this incident may not be directly comparable and you should be able to trust that your detection systems are not faulty especially during times of increased tension, it still cannot be discounted. In such a situation, it would be difficult for a foreign country to convincingly prove they have not launched their missiles within a few minutes (do you expect them to livestream views of their missile silos??) and even less likely that any explanation would convince you that it's just a "false alarm". Do suggest a way to convincingly and instantly prove that missiles have not been fired and I will be more inclined to accept your logic.
@@shelley1428 I believe a good president would have made the decision immediately upon confirmation that people’s lives were at risk. In that situation, there’s only one option: hit the red button without delay. Honestly, I think Michelle took too long to decide.
But if you go large scale how much response does that give left if another country attacks as well, if you went small scale you would have enough left over to continue to assert dominance
@@du_auch_da4520 it means you use more, that’s why you would ask the question as you very well might have enough or you might leave yourselves open for every country to attack
@@rhysrail they still have over 3500 warheads. And if I'm not mistaken large scale response is about 300 warheads. So they still could do over 10 more large scale responses. I think thats more than enough
Wow, this is amazing. The actors get an absolute oscar. Michelle gets everything the world can give for her questions, responses, and the EDITING. This is top tier.
"Sir, there are nuclear warheads launched by Valoria heading to the-" "See the map of Valoria secretary of state?" "Yes sir but-" "I want it to be a thing of the past"
I couldn't do it. I am sitting here tearing up from feeling the stress build up on this side of the screen let alone being in her shoes or it being a real scenario. I am with Michelle- I wouldn't want ANYONE to die so hearing the options and how many would die on either side made my stomach hurt.
I not only grew up during the Cold War but also served. It was a very real time in America. Michelle showed how it could have been like to make a decision like that, and yes it would be very emotional also. We need to stop taking our freedom for granted, because it could be over as we know it, by nuclear or people.
Most likely our freedom won't be taken away by a foreign country, let alone by a full-blown nuclear war, but rather by our OWN government if we, "the people", don't continue to keep it in check, REGARDLESS of the party that's in power...
This was a phenomenal video! I also appreciate the knife-handing general in the thumbnail. Well done to the actors and everyone behind the scenes who were involved in making this video!
I love how you truly put yourself into the situation with your full heart and soul as though it were really happening. I know how difficult it can be, even with a very realistic simulation, to overpower that knowledge in the back of your mind that it still isn't really happening.
Ever since the video you did being a 911 dispatcher for a day, that made me cry, I’ve been waiting for one that would make me cry again, and I KNEW this one was gonna be the one to do it when I saw the title, I was right. I’m so fucking soft
I’ll be honest, initially I thought it was silly and that she was overreacting to this simulation. But when Michelle later said “one of the options was to bomb civilians to make a statement. That shouldn’t even be an option” 18:20 I teared up so fast.
This video is groundbreaking and marks a new milestone for TH-cam. Michel and his team have managed to create such an intense atmosphere in a single room, delivering an incredible show with excellent storytelling, music, visuals, and performances by the actors and actresses.
I have my degree in emeremergency management. We would do the "zombie scenario". Basically zombies have taken over X state and we need to contain it and control it. The instructor would change the scenario so its flowing and different. Sometimes it just ended up with a mass evacuation order telling people be out by X time or else. Then the origin city would basically be bombed to hell, and any other state or city that that had a massive zombie population. After that we'd send in military to do a "clean up" job.
Isn't telling people to stay within closed doors far more safer? I mean if they are zombified, they're behind locked doors, and if the zombies attacks, the civilians are hidden behind locked doors.
@yogammaka That's where. They problem comes in. The instructor would tell us the last know living population, then we'd have to weigh if losing civilians was worth it.
@@thedinkster2163 Which in a situation with zombies, who can multiply in numbers exponentially... It's better to glass the area they inhabit, even though there might be civilians. Zombies are a thing that could take over the world if given the chance. Think Cov19, but way worse, lol. I know your comment is from 2 weeks ago, but this was just my thoughts on the topic. Its also kind of interesting how rabies might have been an inspiration for the zombie trope, since people become hydrophobic and essentially just want to spread the disease/infection as much as possible before they unalive.
@@yogammaka I'd say zombies are overrated for military. In seige warfare, the armies that comes in thousands has heard to massacre entire cities which comes in hundreds of thousands in strength. That's with spears. An organised army is practically a meat shredder. With guns, zombies really won't have a chance if armies systematically cleaned building by building. That's without considering drone capability, aerial capability and armored vehicles like tanks, snipers.
I cant believe I'm crying aswell eventhough I'm not in the same room as them. It hurts knowing you have so many options but all of them considered bad choices
Ngl, I felt MAD as hell when I heard that our navy got hit with missiles and are engage in active combat. "General, send out option B, Large Scale. We are going to hit them fast, and we're going to hit them hard. Secretary of state, prepare for any fallout on the geopolitical stage, Secretary of Defense, mobilize our military assets for war, and National Secruity Advisor, thank you for your input, your service shall be of value"
It’s so crazy the things she’s allowed to do now ever since she got FBI/CIA clearance. Finished the video and the intensity of the situation is so sickening. I could never. I didn’t expect to be so emotional, but the thought of impending doom got to me. Props to the editors and actors
How would she not be allowed to do this? Anyone could hire actors and perform a scene about Nuclear War. I don't think she has FBI/CIA Clearance.... she did try out their training academies but that doesn't mean she has clearance and is in the FBI and CIA. I don't understand your comment maybe you could clarify
@@lexusrental maybe they where just referencing that episode. But I’m not certain because if this is the actual training that presidents go through then there could be a case for it requiring extra credentials, just in terms of the location, and other background stuff. I do think the average person without having the background of those other videos wouldn’t get this kind of access at the very least. They might be able to make their own diy version but maybe not this specific version. But again I don’t know.
SUBSCRIBE so you don’t miss our upcoming episodes:
- I Tried Air Traffic Control
- I Tried Getting A Black Belt in 90 Days
- I Tried Hostage Negotiation
- I Tried Formula 1
sounds promising af!
@@MichelleKhare did you know it only takes 100 nuclear weapons to cause a nuclear winter that would destroy civilization as we know it?
Your choice was terrible.
this side quests are getting insane
This deserves more likes
we getting all the side quests and achievements form here on out guys
Props to the actors they did very well.The way they acted and the video is edited makes this video very scary and the music too. Soo props to the people that were in this video and that worked on the video
Michelle = Kamala
@@handlemonium xD
@@handlemonium
You're pathetic, just like Kamala.
@@handlemonium she's not terrible AT ALL
ye
If any of her editors is reading. You guys NAILED IT!!, literally im just talking talking in my room alone while watching shouting LARGE SCALLEEE!!, MICHELLLE DO SOMETHING!!!
Hats off
Lol I was yelling also, my brother was "what r u doing"
Literally me!!!
We are reading haha! Glad you enjoyed it!
literally me like i was INVESTED yelling at my screen
I was too😂
Bro, this actors are madddd good😮
Pun intended 🤭
@@Greyboi604what pun
@@heeho6942 the MAD doctrine
@@Greyboi604 LMAO I got it haha
@@Greyboi604☺️👍 I understand, thank you very much for happily explaining this unknown scenario to my senses so it could be sent to my brain, and be fashionably processed and completely understood. thanks for assisting me here, this is a very factual message. I will make sure that what you have recently used your device for slash sending this very factual message, is sent out and spread across the chats that this comment will eventually host! I hope you have a good sun time and have a good fun life.
I live in Hawaii. A few years ago we had an emergency notification on cell phones and broadcast on air that nuclear missiles were on the way to Hawaii, I assumed from N. Korea. It ended up being a false alarm that some poor guy accidentally set off, but for about fifteen minutes we thought we were going to get hit by a nuclear bomb. We were looking up nuclear fallout, scale of mushroom cloud, wind direction, where to shelter underground, how to survive a nuclear blast… we called our loved ones and said goodbye. It was the scariest fifteen minutes of my life.
This was so intense, props to all the actors around the table for making the situation so much more immersive and really hammering how stressful this would really be
Made by some's inFLUencer once again
InFLUencer= never credible
Nice try
Yeah buts parts are very faked
“Nuclear missiles are incoming”….as I’m munching on some Frosted Flakes barely just woken up.
I am literally eating frosted flakes in this moment
Gang gang
im eating bread and drinking tea 😂😂
Its like 2am and so am i 😂😂
i ate frosted flakes for breakfast too lol
forget escape rooms , this should be a thing you can experience as an attraction .
frrr
💯 Fr
Great business idea I would 100% go.
@@l-_-lForkBombl-_-lSame 😃
"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play."
12:52 "Our military assets in the pacific has been hi..."
"SEND EVERYTHING"
THEY TOUCHED OUR BOATS!!!!!!
LMAO same fuck them cities idc how much died SEND EVERYTHING
My exact response ☝️
By this time I would launch the whole bundle of thermonuclear missile ...in massive large scale.....
WHERE IS THE TOTAL ANNIHILATION OPTION?
This exercise should be part of the presidential debate aired live before each election.
😂 Joe be hitting the ice-cream button
@@kiel5390not the ice cream button😭😭
@@kiel5390and Trump trying to hit your mom.
I'm pretty sure it wouldn't fill the airing time for Trump :(
@@FruitsandflowersBeaumont He would be stupid during it
12:18 I love the innocence of "You're lying to me!?" lmao such a good moment
it had me wheezing. imagine this being the actual response of an actual president in that situation.
same, like oh my god that's so mean why would you do that haha
@@Meghanr3 My response, "That's not very demure, not very mindful, of you"
This is why women should not be allowed to be President.
"Why mister President, what ever do you mean?"
editors and actors absolutely ATE here - this was so tense
im saying
What did they eat?
I think the person succeeded her or something
Awful vernacular.
Where is this place
"Mr. President, we have nukes inco.."
Me at 9:59: light 'em up! 🔴🖐
hell ya brother usa usa usa
Not just that but in this sim they already launched missles and 50 million or something are gonna die anyway shit send missles back and destroy them lol war over
If everyone was as rash as you the soviet's would have nuked us in the 80s
Smells like democracy and Freedom 🗿
Trump
"Sir, we have a nuclear th-"
"Send em all'
😂😂😭
Fr that’s me
Thats probably worst decision you could make, sending the entire world into a nuclear winter even if it's only 2 countries at nuclear war, convential or peaceful response would be best, even if your country dies you would atleast save the world
@@Idontknow83829yapper ass
Alr.... Whelp it was nice know the 200 something country's but if I cant exist no one will.
As a military officer I can say that these simulations are way more stressful than they seem. When you're in the role, you actually have limited time to make decisions while pondering every potential consequence. It's difficult, but you do learn a lot. Great video.
So, what do you think will be the response of this current administration if Russia and/or China sends nuclear weapons to both East and west coasts?
@@taoist32 Pretty much the same as any previous administration would've been. Pacifism and Humanism die when the nukes fly. That's the big lesson you can take from this video.
This is why we do drills and go over most scenarios over and over so that even something like this is muscle memory. Coming from a ballistic missile submariner.
Richard Feynman once said that the thing that impressed him most about a general was his ability to stare out of a window for a few minutes and make a decisive decision.
My decision would be to do nothing.
There is nothing you can do. The nukes are going to land no matter what you do. I would never inform the public. There is no point in causing the last few minutes of their lives to be distraught. Responding to such an attack would be that of the attackers. The outcome of the attack would be the support of the people once you go on the news to explain the loss of the people, the question should be why did they attack us in the first place.
This simulation is quite literally a nightmare scenario. There is absence of information due to the fog of war, and trying to get more information takes up time you don't have, giving you absence of action. It's very cruel, and terrifying to think that this could potentially happen
I'd say it's an unrealistic setup. Any president or decision maker in that position would at the very least have a deep understanding of their own militaries capabilities and have some established doctrine around how to respond. Their would also be longer lead up that would provide context to diplomatic situation around the conflict. Countries don't just randomly start slinging nukes at each others population centers. You'd have a lead up that would be months if not years in the making.
@@chriskerwin3904 yes, It's unrealistic that way, though it completes the objective of understanding the average person's decision making skills under stress with very high pressure. Though in reality, once any type of shady business starts a behind the scene plan will also start (more so, defense and offense planning in case of emergencies)
Imagine this but at space scales. The game theory prevents some of the necessary communication at all due to the speed of light, so decisions have to be made in the absence of information about the threat.
Nuke em
May be true but the point of a nuclear deterrent is that it's existance is so it's never fired. Nobody wants to pay billions of pounds or dollars a year for a system a scared leader won't use evemif
this should be something everyone can experience for fun or test their mentality, i just felt like remaking this at home because of how intense it was
6:18 that man really just saved the world
She is. Girl
He wasn't even the only one, I believe there was also someone who refused an order to launch nuclear missiles. Nuclear war was averted several times by Soviet individuals keeping their heads cold.
No… he saved america which in retrospect did not save the world
@@anonymous9074 You tell em boy there are other countries apart from America 😅
@@anonymous9074 do you really think that a nuclear war wouldn't have destroyed the word?
There's a reason the phrase "May God Have Mercy on Our Souls" is prevalent in these types of scenarios in movies.
Valoria sounds like a land straight out of a fantasy RPG, and now I can’t get the image of wizards launching ICBMs out of my head.
"I cast nuclear magic missile!"
@@DarthXombieX "I CAST THUNDER SPELL!!"
It also sound sa bit like "Korea"
It's giving Velaris hahaha
Same😂😂😂😂😂
If it hasn't been mentioned already, there is a movie called "Fail Safe" originally from 1964 although a live remake was done in 2000 with George Clooney. Not to give too much spoilers for those who hasn't seen the movie, this simulation reminded me strongly of that movie. One minor disagreement that I have with the video is that there was the "Able Archer 83" incident in which also led the world very close to a nuclear confrontation.
This video was so well done! You could feel the absolute tension and your emotions while watching it.
Nothing like reality
This needs to be a mandatory public test for all potential presidential candidates, but also for all nation leaders for other leaders to understand but also for those voting them into power to understand who they are working with.
This was such a good video to watch!
Why should other countries with no nucleair capacity train just for a US situation, useless.
@renzowessels505 that's a very surface level cause effect child like thinking. Push yourself to answer your own question as you evidently have never been a leader before. And if you have you would do better with some training and a mentor.
What other rights would also require a mandatory test to enjoy?
Running for office is linked to one's right to vote, so requiring a test now restricts that right as well. So, do we have an assembly right test? Association right test? A free press right test? Religion test? Freedom from warrantless search and seizure test?
The test is the campaign, now if the citizenry fails to ask the correct questions and demand answers, the citizenry itself has failed the test.
@@renzowessels505 funny, Japan thought that before Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Totally useless, why train in such a scenario, leading to a blunted response to the bombings.
@@dgrano20 Could you explain your thoughtways please. I don't think it's childish to say that its not very helpfull for every country besides the US to run a US based simulation. If other ountries want to do something like this, then they should make their own simulations based on their country's geopolitical situation.
That was unbelievably intense. Even knowing you are in a simulation, the overwhelming magnitude of your decision in that moment is almost impossible for any one person to bear, so all thoughts of this "this is just hypothetical" seemed to just disappear. And all the credit for it seeming so real is due to the actors who ran it. They really were incredible! I just hope that the world continues to see, through stuff like this, that there is no winning, for anyone, in nuclear conflicts. Amazing video, Michelle!!!!
You know what stuck with me? The moment she pushed the button and after that I felt a feeling of emptiness. OK I gave the order now what? She asked said: "Thats it??".
If you haven't ordered the retaliation strike at least 5 minutes before the first wave strikes, you've waited too long. It isn't like the cold war anymore where we have bombers on alert standing by with live nuclear warheads and it takes a few minutes for a land-based launch control facility to go through the protocols to activate an ICBM launch.
What a great episode. This sheds light on something that most people don't ever get to wonder, the weigh of your decision.
Obama wrote this : "So, I ran a tight process. I trusted my team. I listened to every voice in the room. I gave myself space to think. And then I made a decision that reflected my own personal sense of what was right. While I couldn’t guarantee the outcome, I was confident in making the decision."
Such a polar opposite of the man who succeeded him 😔. "I know everything better than the experts, and if anyone tries to argue with me I tell them to shut up".
With all the glorious but otherwise empty words he till deemed an ineffective present. The lesson is don't believe in bullshits. True character only shows in actions.
He dropped over 30,000 bombs in his last year. He was a warmonger.
,
@@Coffeepanda294 Who's the only one not involved in a war in decades? Oh, yeah.
8:30 We're killing innocent civilians
"it's defending our own country, THEY attacked us!"
Michelle: Their GOVERNMENT attacked us
(Loved that response)
It's stupid. Who does she think the people that are going to die in America are?
their government attacked our civilians. the President's duty is to protect American civilians.
@@higgy82 She still made the decision to do a large scale attack, but that statement showed us she didn't do it heartlessly and full of spite, generalizing a whole civilization based on their leaders. she still had compassion toward millions of innocent human lives being lost. I can respect that
@@higgy82 it also hinted to hoping for an option to just take out THOSE GUYS, the guilty ones who actually committed the attack against us, without having to turn into "those guys" who nuked MILLIONS of innocent
It also shows that she wants an option to just get THOSE GUYS who actually did the deed against millions of innocent, without having to become “those guys” ourselves
Let this serve as a reminder that in nuclear war, no one is a winner
The only way to win the game is … not to play.
but us in africa would be good
@@iany254 Nope, world would freeze, No more trade
@@dragomeus4730 we grow our own crops have our own natural resources what more
@@iany254yeah you do but in case of an worldwide nuclear escalation/war the world would cool down for many years and that would affect the whole world. There is actually historic event in relation to this. In 1815 Mount Tambora erupted and due to the debris cloud, the world cooled down bei 0,5 degress celcius, for example in north america all crops died, it snowed in New York in June. The whole Thing was the worst famine in the 19th century And that was only one (big) volcano.
The tear drop as she hits the button, what an actress, even if the moment made you feelthe emotions that character you kept was amazing
the video is over.. and I'm still shook. I'm just supposed to go on with my day now?!
1m subs and 5 likes is kinda unfortunate
facts but the problem here is, if someone says no, whats the next action.
@@GioArppe 4 actors screaming at you for 9 minutes.
idk, 5 people in a room acting like there is a nuclear war soon and some crying for no reason, just dramatically edited, not that deep
@@b0k193 you can see tears running down Michelles face mate. she's def feeling a pressure, just maybe not 100% of what the president would. I dont think you get how easy it is to trick the brain a situation is real, just takes good actors who play along with a delusion that becomes more and more real.
"SIr, we have a nucular threat"
"What?"
"And our navy just got at-"
"Send them all"
Dont touch our boats!
DO NOT TOUCH OUR BOATS!
That was my largest decision point, as at that point, they were engaging our conventional forces and population centers. Large, to neutralize their military capabilities.
Meanwhile, our nuclear armed allies would automatically launch on warning of the attack upon us, per their treaty obligations. Why do you think Putin hates NATO so much?
A wise man once said: “We attacked a few boats, they dropped the sun on us twice!”
Its takes her 3 months to make a EPIC video and they are worth the wait! Can't wait for the next one
(thats for the likes and heart!!!)
This is literally just a acting class lol
@@420jdizz an***
@@420jdizz an***
True
@@420jdizzan***
I would have done a full retaliatory strike in the first 90 seconds
Same
Same
Yep you could tell he was bluffing on the phone. Option 2 it is.
1. Alert everyone in the affected zones. 2. Confirm that it is, in fact, a real attack. 3. Hear the options. Pick the one that cripples their military the most. Looks better, even marginally, to the global population. 4. Head to the Winchester for an ice-cold pint and wait for it all to blow over.
@@darkknightdjethat was the best reference i think ive ever read in my life
“Average American citizen” I hardly believe Michelle is average, the amount of challenges shes accepted, more experienced than I will ever be!😅😂😂❤
Yes but a lot of people have the opportunity and shes also an inspiration.
But yes the power an average human has shouldn't be taken for granted
I was also going to comment the same thing.
literally what i was abt to comment 😂
I love these "challenge accepted" videos. Always garanteed quality entertainment. I know it´s easy to sit behind the screen and post a comment. But I think I would choose the large scale nuclear answer as well.
Fun Fact Michelle: There is a video called "Coldline" and it is similar to the simulation that you did in this video, the game takes place in the height of the Cold War and a Nuclear Missile is heading towards New York City and you are the Chairman of the USSR and you are tasked with stopping the nuclear warhead from reaching New York, and stopping Nuclear Armageddon, and you have a red phone and have to try to contact the President to intercept the Missile.
Note: This is not sponsored this is just something I just wanted to Bring up.
thats cool
Tbf that's just a game making fun of phone trees.
War games good to
My toxic trait is that i think i can do this with ease 💀
2:01 "Can an average American" AVERAGE? HAVE YOU SEEN YOUR OWN CHALLENGES?!?!?
Exactly, this is all below average I.Q. nonsense put on for "likes" an entirely meaningless thing.
RIGHTTT
Lol😂
Ikr😂😂
She literally said someone who's not trained in politics right after
I grew up at a Manhattan Project nuclear site. It created plutonium for the Trinity test and the bomb dropped on Nagasaki. Watching this took me straight back to my childhood. We knew we were a target, we wore dog tags as kids, no duck and cover drills at our schools. We knew we were going to die. Every large building in our town was a fallout shelter. As kids, 5-6 years old, we knew where they all were and how many minutes it would take to get there. Ty for doing this video. I think the younger generation doesn’t see the impossible choices and consequences faced by a president. Being a 3rd generation nuclear worker made me proud bc I felt like I was helping to fight communism and keeping Americans safe. I feel like I did the right thing at the time. Ty Michelle!❤❤❤
little did you know you were brainwashed and don’t even know what communism is
Curious thing there is someone from the other side of the world who thinks exactly the same but change communist for americans, and both believe be the good guy
It's amazing (awful, but amazing) to hear that perspective. I've always had a weird concern for nuclear warfare even though I've never experienced the fallout (not a pun, I just can't think of a better term) of the warfare itself. Living along a coastline, I've often thought about what we would do and we don't know because it's not thought of much. It's hard to imagine that your understanding of where/how long to to to the bunks was, is equivalent to an arcade in the '00s or a club nowadays.
I don't usually post political opinions but with this being more real than ever, there's only one person I want in that chair..
@@javierpdayou’re exactly right. The average person wants what’s best for their country, family, friends, etc. No one ever thinks they’re a bad guy. That’s what makes growing up the way I did so conflicted.
My grandfather grew up in Los Alamos.
Growing up in the Cold War, having read A LOT of Tom Clancy, and having watched Wargames multiple times, this is something right up my alley. And yeah, tensions were high in 1962 (Cuba), but the introduction of BMEWS in 1961, created a close call and I believe the Russians had a close call as well.
But the russian close call happened I believe in either 1979 or the early 80s
Okay the russian nuclear close call happened in September 26th 1983
Have you ever played defcon? It has a free demo and is quite scary.
@@ardwetha no I haven't where is it available on
@@ardwetha I played my last video game in 1983.
Large scale was the option as soon as they gave me the options. It took just 10 seconds… it is what it is. It wasn’t about me or my emotions, it was just what was best (or least worst) for my people.
The very fact that we are on the cusp of this type of situation is bone chilling . I am so proud of Michelle, showing us some of what the government does a lot of this kind of stuff is hidden a civilians and I feel like we have the right to know so kudos to her for bringing some of the stuff to light!!!
Those actors all need Emmys STAT
Now now let’s be real
@@darriendove8380 If nothing else, this episode needs to be submitted to an Emmy category, like "Outstanding Short Form Comedy, Drama Or Variety Series." That a TH-cam series hired legitimate actors, that they didn't break character, that they knew what to reply from their role's point of view, all the while dealing with someone stressing out about the ethics, not just playing it like a video game as many would do, that's really, really, really uncommon. It's playing out in real time, too, on a platform where either you shoot a ton and cut a ton, or you just post something overly long. This is the perfect length for the scenario presented.
Man I truely love your videos and how you highlight the things a majority of us wouldn’t even have a chance to experience or even think about. This video here cut deep for me cause it’s like dang what would I do. The response. The decision making. Pray for our leadership, and thank you for your channel and how you utilize your platform.
I would of chosen large scale straight after the report of the navy been attacked.
Same
"Sir! They're shooting at us!"
"Well fucking shoot back!"
Black Hawk Down 😂
shut up cuh
Lol
You've got a half dozen options on how to do so or even not shoot back at all.
Meanwhile, allies have already launched their arsenals, as is required by our mutual defense treaties.
I'd be assessing between small and large right until our conventional naval forces were engaged, at that point, they're at a full military degradation attack posture, so it's large to eliminate their capability to attack further or ever again. Real world, they'd detect my counterattack and launch everything that they could.
There aint' gonna be any winners, just survivors.
But then, I started my military career in tactical nukes.
this has me in tears and riddled with anxiety. this video was really well made and beautifully captures the reality that such a position of power holds in its responsibility and duty to millions, if not billions. I knew something like this was stressful but this really drove that stress factor deep inside of me as i struggled to think of how i would have responded.
The sad part is every single second spent trying to find a peaceful solution meant a million more bodies being thrown into the mountain of the dead
I have 3 things to add:
1) Kobayashi Maru
2) “In the nuclear age, war itself is the enemy.” (Denzel Washington in Crimson Tide)
3) “What a curious game. The only way to win seems to be to not play.” (WarGames)
As soon as the naval assets were hit, there was no going back as this was confirmation of an attack.
Worse, hitting naval assets, which are conventional, as our surface fleet are all conventionally armed now, also speaks to their strategy to eliminate our military capabilities. So, it defaults to large response to eliminate their military capabilities.
Watching this video, also stressed me out hearing everything. This was a tearjerker, like a movie with no good ending at all. I’m really glad youtube recommended this to me, it was 100% worth it. May we never use these weapons forever.
When a leader says “ I want it to be peaceful as possible” that leaders nation is getting cooked 💀
Not sure if you noticed but she "pressed the button". It's far better to have a leader who weighs up the consequences of their actions.
@@lamsmiley1944 it is but by taking too long to make a decision can lead to more of their people dying. When they do something is perhaps more important than what they do.
There is a big difference between weighing up the consequences of your actions and being indecisive or having a breakdown. In the last minute or so she wasted lots of time effectively stalling pushing the button and that was very unproductive, that wasn’t reasoning or weighing up the consequences, that was just time wasting because she didn’t want to do it.
@@conorstewart2214 it’s vital that you take as much time as possible to verify the validity of the threat. There has been multiple false alarms that if acted upon straight away would have resulted in nuclear war.
@@lamsmiley1944 yes thats true, but not the way she went about it. The second she heard option 2# she shouldve gone for ir. Option one is automatic no, why tf attack civilians just cause. (in option 2 is different cause they're collateral, we're not tryna kill them we tryna disable their military). Option 3, never, they're killing our people, i'd rather die fighting than pleading. Samething for option 4, we're not gonna do nothing. The faster we respond back the better chance we got at stopping more lifes lost, so its important to take the decisions in a snap
Morals. Even in a while presidential scale, morals are still to be upheld as much as possible.
Just shows that not just anyone can hold this position. We do need a strong proven leader.
Do you think Biden or Kamala are strong leaders? Thoughts on Trump? We are in heaps of trouble if we have no current strong leaders.
@@taoist32 exactly
@@taoist32I believe Trump is strong enough
@taoist32 Let me just say this, who had wars continue throughout their term? Who resolved and prevented wars during their term? Who had better strategies and got things done as far as military and protecting those in our country?
Biden wouldn't even know what's going on in his state. Honestly, they would probably bypass his decision. Can't let someone with dementia make life altering decisions.
“Hold-on whatttt” was my first reaction
SAME
Mine was, “Oh fuck…”
oh god i love you michelle when you said i dont want either of these options and how it was so ridiculous thats exactly what i was thinking... id be furious if that was the best they could come up with....in my honest belief violence only begets more violence and i would do the non attack response, for the moment because whether americans die or not it wasnt by your hand and if there is no prevention of their deaths than killing more people would be pointless and foolish...
but if the enemy continued i would do the military non nuclear option as a "i had no other alternative"...
you are such a smart woman and im so glad people like you exist!!
I think the president has already failed when they ask if you can vacate multiple cities & 65 million people in 10 minutes.😂
Yea hopefully there will be a brighter bulb than her running the show LOL
I had to laugh out loud, they wouldn’t even make it to their car in less then 10 minutes
@Gregory077 Yea like we need a decision so we can get you on AF1...40 seconds until Washington is vaporized 🤣
@@mikem9892lmao
Wishful thinking
“We have missiles coming”
Me:”just launch our missiles”*rolls back over and goes to sleep*
Yeah simple
She would make a horrible president. She can't stall because she's crying, I would have made the large scale decision minutes before her.
and humanity cooked 😂
yes sleep forever
Well take a nap... THEN FIRE ZE MISSALES!!!
Am I the only one who thinks that large scale is the only sensible option?
Option 2 it is.
yeah, because mutually assured destruction is a thing
@@Someone-sc2hk But if you bomb the country back to the stone age, can they hit back?
Don’t read if you don’t want a spoiler to the end of Enders Game. Good movie better book
Kind of Reminds me of Enders Game. At the end the only option was to sacrifice everything/everyone and kill the queen to stop the threat
clearly not because that's the option everyone chooses. Targeting population centers is a non-starter for most and once the conventional response is taken off the table, there's simply no other choice.
The fact that this made me emotional and felt real says something about this simulation. This would be genuinely terrifying to encounter if this were to really happen honestly, let's just hope this never happens at all.
Props to the editor, the actors, and the concept. Amazing.
This is what would never happen…
Sure the acting is good but the enemy would not be targeting cities first the first wave of nuclear missles (from both sides) would be targeting the others nuclear assets (silos, naval bases, air bases, mobile launching vehicles etc…) so their is actually not as much deaths as they say within that short time period. Even Russia and china today don’t want to kill everyone they just want to take out the power (millitary and government) of the USA and other NATO members. Then their is the SSBNs wich are nuclear submarines that can go anywhere in the world, undetected, then Launch their missiles then their are multiple launch profiles… blah blah blah. Just keep in kids this is not what would happen
Politicians watching this while drinking tea in their mansions.
"Good, Good, live in fear.. yes.." *maniacally sips tea*
How does one sip tea maniacally? :D
With maniacly intent@@jinnturtle
Like Gary newsom or any another Dem......
The obamas in their various private islands xD
This was such a good video, that fact that she was like crying and getting scared tells us there was some good actors.
Doesn't it feel so fake tho?
@@zxkredoright like she knows it’s fake theres no way she’s this sad over a simulation lol. Even the diction shes choosing shows that its fake lol
Wdym? She was overreacting. She stressed me out more than the situation.
Very good video definitely felt the pressure also.
Michelle, this is, by far, one of your top 3 challenges. Goosebumps all the way through. Just like your 911 Operator challenge, they both created a lot of emotion and a lump in my throat. You never cease to amaze me.
YAAYYYYY SHE POSTED
Fr yayyyyyyyyyyy🎉🎉🎉🎉
YUSSS
FR
WE HAVE BEEN WAITING 🎉
YAY NUKES
iis it weird to say that 4.6m subscribers feels way too low for the quality of michelles videos? these are on par with the best of the best dude, she should have so much more recognition!
yes
War games said it best
“The only way to win, is not to play”
I'm shaking to make a decision, and this is through a third pov. Imagine you are in the situation room facing information from multiple angles, to determine which is reliable and which is not, to listen to opinions not only from your allies but also from the enemy in question. No decision will be the right decision here. We can only look back, after all is over and we have the luxury to do so, and judge whether that was a "good" choice or not.
If it makes you feel better then this is likely not all that realistic. Most of the questions she asked during this was information that the president would be expected to know beforehand and know in more detail. For example the president would know the response options and probably already has responses planned out for the most likely scenarios.
I wouldn’t look into this too deeply, I would see this as good to get you thinking but not as all that realistic.
@@conorstewart2214 I agree with you. The president would already be aware of the response choices available for a particular adversary launching against us like that. It would be more a matter of conforming the threat is real and responding in a manner as already discussed in prior scenario-based discussions.
Dear Michelle, with all due respect,
A large-scale nuclear attack on an opposing country's military could be seen as strategically beneficial for those seeking to swiftly cripple the enemy's defense capabilities, potentially leading to a faster end to conflict. By targeting military assets, the aggressor might aim to prevent prolonged warfare, which could otherwise result in even greater loss of life over time. Despite the tragic loss of lives, such an attack could be argued as a means to achieve a decisive victory, thereby minimizing future casualties and establishing long-term security.
Even though it seems inhumane, the OTHER country has done so already, meaning THERE IS NO RIGHT OPTION ANYMORE.
All in all- by wasting time, you just constrained yourself to the remaining time you had, as you had mentioned before it felt like you were backing yourself into a corner.😮💨
Your choice was a phenomenal decision, in my eyes, THE BEST DECISION.
Keep posting content, its amazing, to come back and see your videos.
P.S. Vasili Alexandrovich Arkhipov is a true hero ❤
Most of us would not be born if he said Y . E . S.
I totally agree with you
I understand your reasoning, and I think thats why Michelle decided to go with that option aswell. But you go and say that "Vasili Alexandrovich Arkhipov is a true hero", when he, in the exact same situation in his eyes as Michelle was given at the start, decided NOT to fight back, not to target civil nor military assets.
In your eyes, by your reasoning, in Vasili's shoes, you would've caused most of us to "not had been born", ever; because you would've said Y. E. S.
It's not my intention to confront you in any way, just thought it was an interesting dilemma, which highlights the point of the video.
NO, full force response was not the best decision; not in Vasili's shoes. Thats why he is a true hero.
@@Ggeeko Except in his shoes no Soviet ships were hit with missiles.
The only right option in this scenario was in the hands of the other country, and they chucked it out the window when they launched the nukes.
Besides, all your doing with a small-scale countervalue attack is nuking 10s of millions of innocent civilians to make a statement without even eliminating the threat. Perversely, eliminated military assets with counterstrike nukes, risking 100s of millions of civilians being collateral damage, becomes the least worse option. It's all truly MAD.
Average guy would have launched when the ambassador called with that passive aggressive tone 😂
“Oh you in on it? Word. 💣💣”
Put any male and he'd use his brain a lot better without as much emotions as a woman would.
me lol
Facts, was hasing stress sne didmt just launch Them
Yeah, I feel like there was a lot of time wasted.
@@jeffschauble2110 that's for the TH-cam video
I love the Madam President desk sign. It’s a nice touch. Michelle as usual you guys did totally amazing. Also hanging up on the ambassador was the best part. Michelle, one of my favorite things about you as a person is how personal you get in these videos. Sometimes there is no right or easy answer and sadly way too many do not understand this fact of life. I thank you so much for your videos, especially ones like this video. There is a move called War Games that came out in the 80’s and was remade years later but it taught a similar lesson that you did. In this situation there absolutely is no right answer; there is no correct response for a situation like this.
I’m glad you do these kinds of videos, it’s good to learn how difficult some jobs really are.
I've noticed some copycats doing the same type of content as Michelle. Joe Blow tries Marine boot camp or whatever. Nobody does it like Michelle though. What a badass
Marine bootcamp is NOT an original concept. It has been done many times, and it'll keep being done. They aren't copycats, they're merely using a known formula, just like Michelle.
and people have done it before her? does that mean shes a copycat
Can't top Michelle in this game hahaha she's the real life Barbie of jobs 😂😂 and damnit she's the most entertaining at it too
@@modelotimefooooo1853 She's the most entertaining because she manufactures drama & situations to fit the heroe's journey. A lot of it is real, but a lot of it is also fake.
I like her videos when they aren't so fake that it completely takes me out. Her "I Tried Treasure Hunting" video is one such example: there was no way to suspend disbelief on that one.
To be fair, that's the youtube formula, it's what she's supposed to do, and videos can get boring if you limit yourself to what's actually happening organically. I just don't want to notice it too much :p And well, her production value is top-notch.
I don't care what any other TH-camr does. Michelle is without a doubt TH-cams dare devil. She is the first and, in my eyes the only one that does videos like this. I have been watching Michelle for a few years now and she does these videos justice. One, she is female, and most females wouldn't think of doing such videos. Two, because she is female, she does videos like the ones that she does. The videos challenge her to do or try to do the very best that she can.
Those are some great actors right there, able to convey the seriousness of the situation. Great job Michelle, that was not easy
Great actors!
And it emphasises why this must be trained in advance.
If that scenario was real, then this decision is too important to waste ANY second on "this all feels wrong" or "I'm overwhelmed".
Also... what about a blackmail option as in "Fire enough to annihilate that entire country. We will stop our missiles if they stop theirs"
The scenario is really simplified and in regards to actual nuclear strategy and response options. Their "small scale" is actually known as counter-value strikes (cities, infrastructure, industry) and their "large scale" is actually called counter-force (strictly military, with emphasis on nuclear assets.) They are not mutually exclusive in reality. Pre-set response plans called SIOPs exist for a spectrum of mixing the two and it is also an option to go counter-force first and escalate (or retaliate) using gradual or full send counter value, after seeing what the enemy targeting was. There's also the strategy of which weapons to employ and when - for example you likely lose 90% of your silo based missiles when the timer hits zero so they are use it or lose it, before the incoming strike impacts. But your submarines can be held for a second strike.
My response would be:
1. All bombers scramble instantly upon warning. 1 second into the scenario, i want my bombers loaded and safely up off the ground ASAP. They can always be recalled.
2. Immediate counter force launch with all ground based missiles the instant it is confirmed the Navy was struck. That's the absolutely sure act of war line. Arguably the EMP could be, but the advisors did not seem to have 100% confidence that was enemy action. Bombers released to proceed to targets.
3. Absorb the incoming strike, see what was hit. And respond accordingly...
- If the enemy only targeted military assets, order bombers to strike surviving enemy military assets and if no more viable strategic targets, re task for tactical strikes on any enemy mobile forces (fleets or armies.) Stand down submarines, go deep and quiet. These are my reserve deterrence against further enemy nuclear strikes, or escalation to counter value targeting our cities and long term, deterrence against OUTSIDE interference while the country is down and rebuilding. Conventional forces. Finish the fight with conventional forces.
- If the enemy strike was counter value aimed and our cities are gone, order bombers and submarines to launch a full counter value retaliation and annihilate the enemy economic potential. Including its draft and labor pool. Hold at least two loaded subs in reserve for aforementioned outside deterrence. Conventional forces disperse and withdraw home. Nothing left to conquer and we need the organized forces for homeland disaster relief.
This is the correct response. The average Canadian and American citizen do not have the knowledge of US or NATO military forces or Stratcom SIOP options.
As a layman, I have studied over the years US and Russian military and strategic nuclear forces C3 systems and assets by reading open-source research/books and intelligence.
This nuclear war scenario which takes place over 10 minutes would be incredibly stressful and emotional. Even i would have trouble navigating this scenario.
However, given this situation once a launch is detected and you know that 2-300 nuclear warheads are incoming you are looking at a "LOW" launch on Warning situation like what was seen in the 1983 movie "The Day After "
That means:
1) Ensuring the survival of the nuclear TRIAD by:
A) Informing Stratcom to scramble the B52, B2 and modified B1B bombers to scramble immediately to fail safe points and or alternate airfields in the first second.
2) Send orders to Deployed USN Subs to target enemy military facilities via TACMO planes.
3) Immediately deploy remaining Trident Subs from US bases to pre assigned locations.
4) Launch your 44 ABM missiles plusUS Army Air defence artillery THAAD and tell US Navy Pacific Command to send orders to the guided missile cruisers and destroyers to launch the SA-6 ABM hypersonic missiles to stop enemy warheads.
5) Disperse all Continental US military forces
5) Activate the nationwide Emergency Alert System (EAS)
6) Activate the Civil Defense System.
7) launch Minuteman III missiles with 8 MIRV containing W-88 300-400 kt thermonuclear warheads for a massive EMP strike. I would launch 25-50 missiles immediately.
8) Evaluate the conventional or significant Nuclear Strike option.
9) However, once the US missile early warning system confirms EMP detonation at the 200-300 miles above the US. Then
10) You enact the Significant Nuclear Strike option which will kill 100-140 million people and cripple their secondary strike capabilities.
This should take 2 out the 10 minutes.
The President can leave the Situation Room for Andrew's AFB for Air Force 1 at this point.
When the ambassador called you inform him of what we know and that the US of America has responded in order to determine future aggressions.
When the Secretary of Defence informs the President that the US Navy has been attacked then you order your conventional forces to attack the enemy.
At this point in the 6.22 time index, there is nothing to do but leave for Andrews AFB for Air Force 1 to leave Washington for safety.
My last point is I had to read your response and I had to think of mine. However, one point that was missing in the scenario ( and something I did not think about) is that nuclear missiles after their boost stage 10 min out from impact can't be recalled. That means YOU DONT HAVE TIME to delay your response and its too late to negotiate with the enemy. If the scenario took place over 1 hour the response and options would be different and far more realistic.. You have to ensure the survival of the country and military forces. Its difficult to make the decision to kill 140 million of the enemy citizens, but the President of the US of America has the responsibility to make these decisions using logic, critical thinking, an understanding of you military forces and deployment and emotional consequences
Part II- In my comme
Part II- In my comments I think that when the Ambassador of Veloria call at 4:12 to speak to the President it was a delay tactic. Negotiations at this point was impossible. My last point is that when the US Navy is attacked in the Pacific at 2:28 the "Launch On Warning " option effectiveness is seriously diminished so the actress took too long to make a decision to enact the significant nuclear strike option.
This is Where it gets interesting: 0:01
W comment
this is where it stops being interesting 19:32
In my opinion I think it gets more interesting at 0:02
@@ZacNorris-le5ivnah man it’s 0:31.
0:00
The only thing I would've said to the Ambassador is "We have detected numerous nuclear launches and we are preparing a response. Unless you can provide me immediate proof that no such launches have taken place, we have nothing to discuss."
Personally, I would have begun mobilizing all armed forces, told civilians to seek immediate shelter, ready all reserve units, and immediately begin preparing for Option 2 (Large Nuclear Strike). You can't finesse a nuclear exchange, once one of them goes, they ALL go. That's WHY no one wants to use them, that's WHY we still have them.
With the addition..."you have 30 seconds, time starts now!"
which is why, after numerous "red lines", Russia still hasn't fired one - its because all hell can brake loose an no one knows had bad it will get
@@brainthesizeofplanet It’s also why there’s direct lines of communication to the Russian Head of State for this exact reason. No arguing with an ambassador, get Putin on the damn phone 😂😂
"That's WHY no one wants to use them, that's WHY we still have them." so just dont use them?
Counterpoint - Stanislav Petrov. Of course this incident may not be directly comparable and you should be able to trust that your detection systems are not faulty especially during times of increased tension, it still cannot be discounted.
In such a situation, it would be difficult for a foreign country to convincingly prove they have not launched their missiles within a few minutes (do you expect them to livestream views of their missile silos??) and even less likely that any explanation would convince you that it's just a "false alarm".
Do suggest a way to convincingly and instantly prove that missiles have not been fired and I will be more inclined to accept your logic.
This was one of the most emotional videos I’ve seen on this channel, this is amazing work.
"The missiles will hit in 8 Minutes"
"Can we evacuate the city?"
I like the naive optimism 😂
Some people in that room are secretly rolling their eyes🙄 at the response 200 I.Q.
I can’t get out of my house in 8 mins lol
It's just thinking out loud in a stressful situation
Duck and cover may save the suburbs but the city centers are cooked.
Women☕☕
It takes Michelle almost 10 minutes to decide!
Me: presses the red button 10x
That's why you can't be a president LoL, it's not just that decision you take cos you feel like but it might work or not
@@shelley1428 I don’t have the patience to ask all those questions! I make a decision within a few minutes at most
@@shelley1428 I believe a good president would have made the decision immediately upon confirmation that people’s lives were at risk. In that situation, there’s only one option: hit the red button without delay. Honestly, I think Michelle took too long to decide.
It annoys me when there's 1 minuite left and she's STILL stalling, still asking questions when actions needed to be made.
@@shelley1428 infact the president has to make descisions FAST
That is a high quality video like something like Netflix
Really well made video. I was literally constantly shouting in my head: "Large scale! Large Scale!"
But if you go large scale how much response does that give left if another country attacks as well, if you went small scale you would have enough left over to continue to assert dominance
@@rhysrail large scale doesn't mean that you'll use up all your nuclear capabilities
@@du_auch_da4520 it means you use more, that’s why you would ask the question as you very well might have enough or you might leave yourselves open for every country to attack
@@rhysrail they still have over 3500 warheads. And if I'm not mistaken large scale response is about 300 warheads. So they still could do over 10 more large scale responses. I think thats more than enough
@@du_auch_da4520 yeah you might be right but I’d still ask also it depends on the enemy, I couldn’t imagine Russia would require that few
Wow, this is amazing. The actors get an absolute oscar. Michelle gets everything the world can give for her questions, responses, and the EDITING. This is top tier.
"Sir, there are nuclear warheads launched by Valoria heading to the-"
"See the map of Valoria secretary of state?"
"Yes sir but-"
"I want it to be a thing of the past"
Fr
She’s crying just large scale and they will learn why Japan stopped fucking with us in ww2
HAHAHA
"You see Valoria?"
"Well I don't want to"
And now are allies are engaged in nuclear war with their allies, and the whole world is glowing.
I couldn't do it. I am sitting here tearing up from feeling the stress build up on this side of the screen let alone being in her shoes or it being a real scenario. I am with Michelle- I wouldn't want ANYONE to die so hearing the options and how many would die on either side made my stomach hurt.
I not only grew up during the Cold War but also served. It was a very real time in America. Michelle showed how it could have been like to make a decision like that, and yes it would be very emotional also.
We need to stop taking our freedom for granted, because it could be over as we know it, by nuclear or people.
Most likely our freedom won't be taken away by a foreign country, let alone by a full-blown nuclear war, but rather by our OWN government if we, "the people", don't continue to keep it in check, REGARDLESS of the party that's in power...
While I watched this video I felt an irresistible urge to crouch below a school desk and cover my head with my school bag. Fun times.
This was a phenomenal video! I also appreciate the knife-handing general in the thumbnail. Well done to the actors and everyone behind the scenes who were involved in making this video!
I love how you truly put yourself into the situation with your full heart and soul as though it were really happening. I know how difficult it can be, even with a very realistic simulation, to overpower that knowledge in the back of your mind that it still isn't really happening.
Ever since the video you did being a 911 dispatcher for a day, that made me cry, I’ve been waiting for one that would make me cry again, and I KNEW this one was gonna be the one to do it when I saw the title, I was right. I’m so fucking soft
I’ll be honest, initially I thought it was silly and that she was overreacting to this simulation. But when Michelle later said “one of the options was to bomb civilians to make a statement. That shouldn’t even be an option” 18:20 I teared up so fast.
Thermonuclear Warheads as a response? Targeting military and industrial infrastructure causing the full collapse of valoria
lmfao what the fuck kind of a comment is this
This video is groundbreaking and marks a new milestone for TH-cam. Michel and his team have managed to create such an intense atmosphere in a single room, delivering an incredible show with excellent storytelling, music, visuals, and performances by the actors and actresses.
I have my degree in emeremergency management. We would do the "zombie scenario". Basically zombies have taken over X state and we need to contain it and control it. The instructor would change the scenario so its flowing and different. Sometimes it just ended up with a mass evacuation order telling people be out by X time or else. Then the origin city would basically be bombed to hell, and any other state or city that that had a massive zombie population. After that we'd send in military to do a "clean up" job.
Isn't telling people to stay within closed doors far more safer? I mean if they are zombified, they're behind locked doors, and if the zombies attacks, the civilians are hidden behind locked doors.
@@RamBdehow would they then exterminate said zombies without risk of hurting civilians?
@yogammaka That's where. They problem comes in. The instructor would tell us the last know living population, then we'd have to weigh if losing civilians was worth it.
@@thedinkster2163
Which in a situation with zombies, who can multiply in numbers exponentially... It's better to glass the area they inhabit, even though there might be civilians. Zombies are a thing that could take over the world if given the chance. Think Cov19, but way worse, lol.
I know your comment is from 2 weeks ago, but this was just my thoughts on the topic.
Its also kind of interesting how rabies might have been an inspiration for the zombie trope, since people become hydrophobic and essentially just want to spread the disease/infection as much as possible before they unalive.
@@yogammaka I'd say zombies are overrated for military. In seige warfare, the armies that comes in thousands has heard to massacre entire cities which comes in hundreds of thousands in strength. That's with spears. An organised army is practically a meat shredder. With guns, zombies really won't have a chance if armies systematically cleaned building by building.
That's without considering drone capability, aerial capability and armored vehicles like tanks, snipers.
I really liked this one. It delved into the ethics of nukes and mutually assured destruction, great job, Michelle.
I cant believe I'm crying aswell eventhough I'm not in the same room as them. It hurts knowing you have so many options but all of them considered bad choices
Ngl, I felt MAD as hell when I heard that our navy got hit with missiles and are engage in active combat.
"General, send out option B, Large Scale. We are going to hit them fast, and we're going to hit them hard. Secretary of state, prepare for any fallout on the geopolitical stage, Secretary of Defense, mobilize our military assets for war, and National Secruity Advisor, thank you for your input, your service shall be of value"
I NEED A PART 2, IMMEDIATELY!!
seriously
Also get the people in the south and mid west into shelters as fast as possible
It’s so crazy the things she’s allowed to do now ever since she got FBI/CIA clearance.
Finished the video and the intensity of the situation is so sickening. I could never. I didn’t expect to be so emotional, but the thought of impending doom got to me.
Props to the editors and actors
Wait she has FBI/CIA clearance? When did that happen, what does that mean?
@@BrittanyArtPoetryShe doesn’t don’t listen to this idiot 😂
@@BrittanyArtPoetrywait I’m curious too actually
How would she not be allowed to do this? Anyone could hire actors and perform a scene about Nuclear War. I don't think she has FBI/CIA Clearance.... she did try out their training academies but that doesn't mean she has clearance and is in the FBI and CIA. I don't understand your comment maybe you could clarify
@@lexusrental maybe they where just referencing that episode. But I’m not certain because if this is the actual training that presidents go through then there could be a case for it requiring extra credentials, just in terms of the location, and other background stuff. I do think the average person without having the background of those other videos wouldn’t get this kind of access at the very least. They might be able to make their own diy version but maybe not this specific version. But again I don’t know.
Wow! beautiful editing and acting. This made me emotional and stressed I can't imagine how anyone could handle this.
I feel like the video lacks an end. Like a debrief or an explanation on how the president trains for this type of situation
Its purposefully not shown. You know spies exist.?
The end is Americans get to vote for the person who might have to make such decisions in 3 months.
What I'd rather like is for Michelle how she came to the decision for the large scale attack. What was going through her mind?
@@BEstudent yes exactly, I just felt like the end was really abrupt
15:03 not to rude. I'm pressing that button
Same
@@leannewatkin6261 the moment i hear nukes and retaliate with nukes, i press nukes
Same
@@Jaysigma5😂
Fire with fire or water vs fire
YESSS SHE IS BACK
These actors are mad good