@@optical-prime It was said in half jest. Appreciate the effort put forward. I look forward to learning from what you did here, when I put forth my own videos. Keep going.
@@EdEdwardsCiphers lol well i take what i can get, nearly fell out my chair when i saw i had a comment, i checked out your channel and watched some videos and will be looking at the information from your bio, i am interested to find out more about Edward Wayne Edwards.
@@optical-prime Thanks. It's appreciated. Ed is hard for people to swallow, and follow. But that is by design. I hope to make more videos soon. But I'm a few months away I think, from being able to explain the concepts fully. If it were EZ then people would have been able to follow what I've written on forums and blogs. But alas, they're either blinded by their bias of their own suspects, or just aren't really capable of holding a thread long enough to understand what Edwards really was. Edwards was the only Zodiac suspect that was a serial killer. He's the only Zodiac suspect that killed people. He's the only Zodiac suspect that killed couples. And he's the only Zodiac suspect that killed couples on lovers lane. And yet, people are confused by what was put out about him, instead of understanding the tapestry of murder that he was weaving. Also , people don't understand the why. But I'm pretty sure I do. I'm pretty sure I've cracked more than almost anyone else for the case of the Zodiac. Well except for one or two people. Or is that 3 or 4? LOL Time will tell.
![The Savage Seven (1968) [Selected for the First Quentin Tarantino Film Festival, 1997]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LpKXE5Rr-N8/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Savage Seven (1968) [Selected for the First Quentin Tarantino Film Festival, 1997]](/img/tr.png)
There are three killers at play here. Examine the methods and circumstances.
Can you break it down for us maybe? Using your insights. Please share with us.
You made this a year ago? And no comments? How is that possible?
There is now at least thank's to you, thank you for your kind word's
@@optical-prime It was said in half jest. Appreciate the effort put forward. I look forward to learning from what you did here, when I put forth my own videos. Keep going.
@@EdEdwardsCiphers lol well i take what i can get, nearly fell out my chair when i saw i had a comment, i checked out your channel and watched some videos and will be looking at the information from your bio, i am interested to find out more about Edward Wayne Edwards.
@@optical-prime Thanks. It's appreciated. Ed is hard for people to swallow, and follow. But that is by design. I hope to make more videos soon. But I'm a few months away I think, from being able to explain the concepts fully. If it were EZ then people would have been able to follow what I've written on forums and blogs. But alas, they're either blinded by their bias of their own suspects, or just aren't really capable of holding a thread long enough to understand what Edwards really was.
Edwards was the only Zodiac suspect that was a serial killer. He's the only Zodiac suspect that killed people. He's the only Zodiac suspect that killed couples. And he's the only Zodiac suspect that killed couples on lovers lane. And yet, people are confused by what was put out about him, instead of understanding the tapestry of murder that he was weaving.
Also , people don't understand the why. But I'm pretty sure I do. I'm pretty sure I've cracked more than almost anyone else for the case of the Zodiac. Well except for one or two people. Or is that 3 or 4? LOL
Time will tell.