Yeah, but what about the ghost in the machine? Quantitative analysis doesn't account for novelty and yet this presentation demonstrates useful insights.
In my opinion, too much of dramatic narration and neurobiological trivia for a lecture I thought would be more about unobvious Metaverse challenges. I anticipated there would be more food for thought than a "it'll be very believable, we're gonna be manipulated, we're doomed" thesis. It's good that security and privacy defense regulation topic is brought up, but I would appreciate the call for it to be in a calmer and more grounded fashion. I don't like to be intimidated or condensated into thinking about smth
The Meta verse is a modern day Tower of Babel and it will fall. God’s destroyed the Tower of Babel and scattered the different tongues and the Meta verse is a way to be like god and connect the world but it will fail.
Yeah, but what about the ghost in the machine? Quantitative analysis doesn't account for novelty and yet this presentation demonstrates useful insights.
In my opinion, too much of dramatic narration and neurobiological trivia for a lecture I thought would be more about unobvious Metaverse challenges. I anticipated there would be more food for thought than a "it'll be very believable, we're gonna be manipulated, we're doomed" thesis. It's good that security and privacy defense regulation topic is brought up, but I would appreciate the call for it to be in a calmer and more grounded fashion. I don't like to be intimidated or condensated into thinking about smth
The Meta verse is a modern day Tower of Babel and it will fall. God’s destroyed the Tower of Babel and scattered the different tongues and the Meta verse is a way to be like god and connect the world but it will fail.