MASTERS OF THE AIR (Parts 1-2) | FIRST TIME WATCHING | REACTION

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 593

  • @filmkid541
    @filmkid541 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    My father went through the Air Cadets program and arrived in Thurleigh England in November '44 as a replacement pilot in the 306th Bomb Group, 367th Bomb Squadron. He was a month shy of 21 years old. His B-17 was named "Punchy' (44-8197). He was a co-pilot for his first few missions and later was promoted to pilot. He was involved in some of the "1000 plane" missions over Berlin. Combat missions ended in mid April of '45 and when the war ended he ferried aircraft and then went to North Africa taking his B-17 on missions with cartographers so we could have more accurate maps of Morocco and other areas there. After the war he was a pilot for a major airline and retired from that after 33 years. He never talked much about his time in the war, but he had a sudden illness and in his last couple of months he opened up to me about those days. I was very proud of his participation in the war and when I was young I must have built two dozen models of B-17s, When I was in my thirties I took him to see a B-17 that travelled all over the country participating in air shows. He had not been inside a B-17 since the war and the crew of the B-17 invited him to sit in the pilot's seat. He was hesitant at first but accepted the invitation. He put his hands on the yoke and sat there lost in thought. (very Dana Andrews in that famous scene in "The Best Years of Our Lives") I have his flight jacket, medals and photos. He lived a long and happy life.

    • @gat569
      @gat569 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s beautiful man. Thank you for sharing it! My grandpa was a copilot in the 388th bg, 563rd sqdrn out of knettishall July-October 44. Very proud of him and so glad they made this series so I could know a little bit more. These were real people. What they fought for, the values of democracy and freedom over fascism/totalitarianism is our legacy to carry on. May we with God’s help meet that mission. Let’s not forget what they and our country fought for. It was the best of us.

    • @filmkid541
      @filmkid541 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gat569 Thanks for your reply. There is a guy who does architectural renderings of B-17's - here is the link to my father's plane "Punchy," www.markstyling.com/1ADJPEG/B171ADCu-100.jpg

  • @samson9535
    @samson9535 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

    My Uncle, Archie V. Benner, Jr., after earning a degree in Architectural Engineering from Texas A&M (Class of 1938), joined the Army Air Corps where he received his commission as a 1LT, and became a member of the 8th US Army Air Force. He was a B-17 bomber pilot in the 549th Bombardment Squadron, also known as " The Bombing Devils". He was one of the original "kindergarten pilots" because, as squadron commander, he led numerous missions over France and Germany before his twenty-fifth birthday. For his valiant service to his country, including missions flown during the Battle of Normandy, he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross, Air Medal with three Oak Leaf Clusters, Presidential Unit Citation, and EAME Theater Ribbon with three Bronze Service Stars. He was one heck of an Uncle and he is missed.

    • @Billy-zv6gv
      @Billy-zv6gv 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your uncle is absolutely inspiring! My great uncle was also a pilot in WWII, and he was awarded a rusty pair of dog tags that barely identified his plane crash dug out of a farm field in France in 2022.

    • @gragrn
      @gragrn 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Salute!

    • @girl_friday9185
      @girl_friday9185 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is incredible how young in age, but not in spirit, heroes such as your Uncle were. Trained quickly & tossed together; given one harrowing mission after another…my deepest love to all our courageous, esteemed military members, heroic vets and supportive families-far too much would be lost without their sacrifices.🫡🎖️🕊️

    • @troyt6864
      @troyt6864 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your uncle and granddad (PBY-5 CATALINA nose gunner) were awesome men. Hope they're enjoying heaven.

  • @ryanweintraub9448
    @ryanweintraub9448 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +123

    The only thing this show is missing is the real guys telling their story documentary style like BoB and The Pacific. It's sad the reason they probably aren't in the show is that they're essentially all gone

    • @panamafloyd1469
      @panamafloyd1469 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yeah. I think the only time I ever had the chance to talk to them (the few that would talk, anyway) was because I was an aviation geek, and hung around WW2 antiques at air shows. One of 'em who'd actually seen "Band of Brothers" said, "..up there, there wasn't anywhere to hide."

    • @Maverick25ish
      @Maverick25ish 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      They aint in the show because this show is recent and they have all left us, But they all did tell their stories! around 2005 the hisory channels all interviewed them and the fighter pilots and their stories are unbeleiveable

    • @ahoyforsenchou7288
      @ahoyforsenchou7288 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Reminder that the Allies fought for the wrong side in WWII.

    • @salto1994
      @salto1994 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      next week there is an episode 10 next week which is a documentary. so kinda like the interviews at BoB

    • @arhickernell
      @arhickernell 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're doing a final 10th episode just with all that.
      th-cam.com/video/ZkYOtyp3hKU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=trShW9cP2-2Rz2Jt

  • @caldwellkelley3084
    @caldwellkelley3084 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Thanks Cassie. I'm an old man now, but my father was Air Force in the 60's and I can remember sitting at the knee of these guys at the end of their careers listing to their stories of the greatest Air War in history. The memories of these gentlemen flood into my mind. Thanks again. A lot of the series is taken from the book by Harry Crosby the Navigator. Another hint: Crosby was in the squadron called the "Bloody 100th" it was considered a hard luck group. Prepare yourself.

  • @ricktaylor5397
    @ricktaylor5397 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    My dad was a navigator and bomb operator in B-17s in WW2. From the photos he had and the stories he told, this series is quite accurate. On his last mission, the regular tail gunner was ill and was replaced by a new airman, whom the rest of the crew never met. Over Belgium, their B-17 was hit by flak and the tail of the plane took a direct hit, along with the engines. Photos of the plane, taken by the Belgian resistance, show essentially half of the rudder and the tail gunner position were missing. My dad took a piece of shrapnel in his leg and was seriously injured. The medical care he needed was beyond what the resistance could provide, so they reluctantly turned him over to the Germans. He spent the rest of the war in German hospitals and prison camps along with the rest of the crew. The pilot and copilot escaped capture and made it back to England via Spain. Many years after the war, the Belgian village who hid the crew, erected a monument at the site of the crash, and the surviving crewmembers returned.

  • @G3rnsback
    @G3rnsback 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    My grandfather was a tail gunner on a B-17 during WW2. Two of his brothers were infantry, and they used to tell me that my granddad had it the toughest. I always thought they were just saying that to make him look good in front of his grandson, but now I know that they were just being honest.

    • @squint04
      @squint04 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks and respect, to your family's service to our nation!

  • @davidharwood1865
    @davidharwood1865 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The airfield was recreated at RAF Abingdon (now Dalton Barracks) In Oxfordshire a few miles from me. Fascinating to see the base buildings in the distance and a full scale B-17 crashed in the middle of the airfield during filming of the scenes in this episode. Amazing people and they seem to have done an excellent job showing us this period in time just like with Band of Brothers and The Pacific.
    I was also lucky enough to be at Uni in Hertfordshire whilst they filmed Saving Private Ryan on the old Hatfield Aerodrome and we could see the town sets in the middle of the airfield and met some of the crew and stars in the Fighting Cocks pub in St Albans. Great to see the finished Movies and Series after seeing them being made.

  • @ilm-def8920
    @ilm-def8920 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    My late uncle did 35 missions in the Ball Turret of a B-17G, he was with the 381st BG, 535th Squadron at Ridgewell. Heard many stories over the years. One night my uncle and I were sitting having a drink and he was smoking one his favorite cigars and he was talking about one of the worst missions. At the end of that talk, he went silent, stared into the dark hallway across the room an in a low voice said: "God Almighty". I will never forget the look in his eyes, mentally he wasn't in the room, he was in that B-17G over Germany. 0I was at the Crew's first reunion after the War (held in 1977). They were such a great bunch of guys despite living through hell. They were only ages 18 to 25 during their time of service. Imagine kids that age now having the same skill and responsibility as these men? To be fair, there are some now who are capable but anyone will say that their Generation (WW2) were the Greatest.

    • @squint04
      @squint04 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      deepest respect and thanks for your Uncles service to our nation

    • @StuartKoehl
      @StuartKoehl 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Believe it or not, the ball turret was (statistically) the safest position on a B-17, with the lowest fatality rate among crews in which some men survived. The waist gunners had the highest casualty rate.

    • @falsenostalgia-shannon
      @falsenostalgia-shannon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      “Imagine kids that age now” - I see comments like that constantly. Guess what? That’s exactly what people, WW1 vets for example, said back then about THESE guys. They said the kids were too soft and spoiled to fight in a war. And look what they accomplished! ❤ I miss the greatest gen a lot, they were so kind to me and always had fascinating stories to tell.

    • @ilm-def8920
      @ilm-def8920 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@falsenostalgia-shannon Not to try and say some WW1 Vets didn't say that but the younger WW2 Vets went through the harshness of the Great Depression which was exactly what hardened most of them when the War came. My point was that with some exceptions, the more recent generations clearly have had things far easier than those guys did as did my generation (I am 58). Their mindset was more resolute than young generations in the last 20+ years. I do agree, there are exceptions and I'd hazard to say those young people have learned from them and the Vietnam generation (themselves being children of the WW2 generation) were also great people who deserve more recognition than they have. There are always selfless individuals in every generation.

  • @James-zg2nl
    @James-zg2nl 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    My grandfather’s cousin was a Navigator on Sterling bomber with RCAF Bomber Command. His Sterling was shot down over the Netherlands in the autumn of 1944, coincidentally my grandfather was on the ground in the Netherlands a few dozen miles away taking part in the battle featured in the Netflix movie The Forgotten Battle. The whole crew were buried together in the community cemetery of the nearby Dutch town in a nice prominent location across from the cemetery’s entrance.
    Lest We Forget

  • @thestormylifeofbrian2636
    @thestormylifeofbrian2636 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Per your point after the first episode about rather being in the air than the ground; more men died in the 8th Airforce (which is the subject of this series,) than in the entire Marine Corps (the subject of The Pacific,) during WWII.

    • @Yeraveragemoron
      @Yeraveragemoron 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Holy shit -
      25,000
      To the ARMY AF’s: 76,000(ish, rough numbers) not that it’s a numbers game, but that we didn’t hear about the Army AF losses, like we do about other ground units.
      I say that as a grunt myself.

    • @thestormylifeofbrian2636
      @thestormylifeofbrian2636 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Yeraveragemoron Yeah this is something I just learned recently myself. It really boggles the mind the scale of WWII.

    • @lyndoncmp5751
      @lyndoncmp5751 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And RAF Bomber Command was even higher. 55,000 dead out of 125,000 crew. A fatality rate of 45%, which was second highest of WW2, only behind German U-boat crews.

    • @Yeraveragemoron
      @Yeraveragemoron 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@lyndoncmp5751 that’s insanity -

    • @lyndoncmp5751
      @lyndoncmp5751 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Yeraveragemoron
      Sure was. 🤯

  • @Tbass-yy8uc
    @Tbass-yy8uc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    My uncle was a bomber pilot like these guys. Made it through all his missions and got transferred home. 2 weeks after being back in the States he had plane problems crash and was killed. Unbelievable he made it through all that only to come back to the States and die

    • @technofilejr3401
      @technofilejr3401 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So sorry to hear that.

  • @Rufus6540
    @Rufus6540 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    When my dad (Korean war vet, Army) and I took our oldest son to a CAF fly in at a local airport and there was a B-17 there. We were under the aircraft wing enjoying the shade when an old-timer walked up and squatted down next to the ball turret and said "That was my office for 25 missions in WWII." Needless to say, we thanked him for his service and were thrilled to meet and speak with him.

  • @leewaffe3
    @leewaffe3 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I'm super stoaked to see you started watching masters of the air. This hits home for me as an Airmen, these men were the giants who shoulders we stood on. I get to volunteer at the Museum of Flight with one of those giants. Pilot Dick Nelms flew B-17s with the 447th Bomb Group from England and flew 35 missions over Europe including attacks on Berlin and in support of D-Day. We just celebrated his 101st birthday and he's always looking forward to voluteering at the museum in front of our B-17. He wrote a poem for the special day.
    No longer waiting for that day to arrive.
    I’m 101 and still alive!
    I think I know just what to do
    To stay in shape for 102
    And then there’s no stopping me.
    The new target will be 103.
    By Dick Nelms

  • @TheSocratesian
    @TheSocratesian 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +196

    These bomber crews had a higher casualty rate than the Marines in the Pacific, believe it or not.

    • @asmrhead1560
      @asmrhead1560 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      In 1943 they had about a 10x higher casualty rate than the Marines in the Pacific, the early daylight bombing campaign was brutal.

    • @ScreamingTc
      @ScreamingTc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Aye, there's a reason the RAF turned to night bombing early on in the war.

    • @jakubfabisiak9810
      @jakubfabisiak9810 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      You know what's crazy, though? The German u-boat crews had a higher casualty rate than the Kamikaze.

    • @Carln0130
      @Carln0130 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@jakubfabisiak9810 yup, roughly 75% for the war.

    • @dallesamllhals9161
      @dallesamllhals9161 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      in %s A-hole!

  • @squint04
    @squint04 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The Norden Bombsight was an early computer. It would calculate air and wind speed altitude etc. and improve the accuracy of bombs hitting a target when dropped. It was patched in to the plane's auto pilot system! When the Bombardier turned it on, he had flight control of the plane! The term Bombs Away meant that the pilot and co pilot had flight control again when the bombs were dropped. The technology was so closely guarded that before a mission, the Bombardier with armed escort would go to a building and sign out the bombsight and then go to the plane.

    • @jsbrads1
      @jsbrads1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The pilot activated the autopilot so aircraft would experience no accelerations during final approach. The Norden got airspeed from the connection.

    • @MightyDrakeC
      @MightyDrakeC 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      This video th-cam.com/video/U6D5rXbMBKo/w-d-xo.html about the Norden bombsight is really interesting.
      TLDR; In reality, it sucked.
      It was pretty ingenious engineering. But, in reality, there were factors that affected accuracy that the bombardiers had no way of measuring during the mission. Their actual accuracy was worse than half a mile. When you're trying to hit a particular collection of buildings, a half mile is a complete miss. The common phrase at the time was, "The Norden bombsight can drop the bombs in a pickle barrel." Not so much.
      The orders to keep the bombsight out of enemy hands was pure marketing BS. The company got the military to insist on that level of secrecy. It turns out, the Norden company tried to sell the same bombsight to Germany prior to the war. So, they already had a couple of working copies and knew how it worked. The German government decided that it wasn't useful and didn't place an order for their air force.
      To this day, the Norden bombsight still has an aura of mystique about it. Most people who have heard of it accept that it's capabilities are nearly magical. Until I watched that video, I was under the impression that it really was amazing for its time.
      Again, it certainly was very clever. But, it never lived up to the hype.

    • @jsbrads1
      @jsbrads1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@MightyDrakeC they couldn’t calculate their ground speed.

    • @weldonwin
      @weldonwin 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MightyDrakeC Didn't help that it was designed by a con-artist, who used bribery and outright corruption to get it adopted by the US Military

  • @charlize1253
    @charlize1253 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    WW2 missions required 15-40 bombers because aiming from high altitude was so poor. The Norden bombsight, the best of the war, only put half of the bombs within 1,200 feet of the target, which meant half landed more than 1,200 off target. Mathematically that meant 100 bombs needed to be dropped to ensure that one actually hit the target.

  • @robspore5046
    @robspore5046 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My dad was a waist gunner on a B17, with the 390th BG, stationed in England. Nothing but praise for all those guys.

  • @mikealvarez2322
    @mikealvarez2322 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    My late father in law enlisted right after Pearl Harbor and mustered out in November 1945. He was a waist gunner on a B-24 Liberator. He fought in Africa, Italy, and Europe. Most of what I know about him I got from his wife Ann. The only thing he ever said to me was, "Thank God you never have to see what a 20 mm cannon from a 109 can do to a man." He managed to get through the war without a scratch and apparently didn't suffer from PTSD. Ann told me that after he came home he had some bad dreams but they went away with time. So he came home adopted a brother and sister, my wife, and had 1 daughter. He was a kind and gentle person, never spanking his kids. My wife said he would punish them by talking to them first then making them sit in a corner to think about what they had done. Ann told me that their son's death in a car accident was harder on Jim than the war. Actually, her death was the hardest thing Jim ever dealt with. My wife and I made it a point to visit with him 4 or 5 times a week. Every time Ann came up he would tear up. They were married 67 years. Don't get wrong, Jim was a tough man's man. He worked cutting wood during the depression to help support his family. He boxed while in the Army and only lost 1 fight. He took down trees using a lineman's belt and spikes to get to the top then taking the tree down piece by piece. He did this until a stoke stopped him at age 78. It was a whole generation of Jims and Anns that won the war against the Nazis and Imperial Japan. We still have those type of people with us but I fear they are becoming outnumbered by those that do not love America.

    • @jimandaud
      @jimandaud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's a very nice, thoughtful addition to this thread. My Dad was a B24 tailgunner who also survived to live a full life, albeit after being a POW in WWII.

  • @charlize1253
    @charlize1253 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My neighbor flew an F4F Wildcat (Navy) fighter, and a family friend was a B-24 navigator (both now deceased). Sadly, and rarely talked about, they were both largely deaf because the engines and guns were incredibly loud and the planes weren't sealed or pressurized so changing altitudes sometimes injured the crew's eardrums.

  • @michaelspehar695
    @michaelspehar695 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I am a retired Air Force pilot. When in pilot training, we were taught to speak calmly and distinctly, especially during emergencies. We were told it helps us to think and reassures the crew. Most problems in the air have established procedures and responses. We studied hard to know the more likely ones by rote memory. That helped keep us calm. I guess it did, but every time my aircraft suffered a malfunction or other emergency, I always thought my voice went up an octave or two. Nobody mentioned it. In fact, I had crewmen tell me I sounded calm when the stuff hit the fan. Go figure.

    • @squint04
      @squint04 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your service

    • @jimandaud
      @jimandaud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am retired AF as well. 3000 hours in AWACS and ABCCC. I love MOTA. Kind of messes with my head some.

    • @andrewdeen1
      @andrewdeen1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most problems in the air have established procedures and responses that were written in blood by guys like those portrayed on this show

    • @michaelspehar695
      @michaelspehar695 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Heck, I flew EC-121s, the forerunner of the AWACS. During the transition, we sometimes flew missions with the AWACS, testing our combat-experoenced controllers with the new guys. Of course, we were at 10 - 12 thousand feet and the AWACS was way above us! @@jimandaud

  • @critic7127
    @critic7127 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The war in the air was just a different animal entirely. Each part of combat had its own unique horrors, but being a bomber crew, especially in the first half of the bombing campaign, was particularly deadly. At one point, new aircrewmen in these bombers had an average life expectancy of around 6 weeks. As you'll see throughout the series, many of these raids suffered insane loss rates, some cases more than 10%. It might not seem like a high number, but remember that you are flying these missions over and over and over again, being required to complete 25 before you can be done. Every time you get in that plane, there could be a 1 in 10 chance of you not coming back, and you've got to roll that dice at least 25 times and get lucky every time. Many didn't make it.

    • @The_Invisible_Hand
      @The_Invisible_Hand 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      0.9 ^ 25 = 7.2% chance of going home

  • @Wolfsschanze99
    @Wolfsschanze99 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The losses of aircrew was horrific, at the America museum at Duxford in the UK they have a very very long glass panel, on each panel is hundreds of engravings of an aircraft, each engraving depicts an airman lost, the panels must be at least 100yrds long, really brings it home.
    The B17 had a crew of 10 & carried 7 tons of Bombs, the British heavy bomber was the Lancaster, it had a crew of 7 & carried 10 tons of Bombs, Aircrews did not have the room to wear parachutes, they were hanging up near each work station, when ordered to bail out crews would have to put them on, in most cases the aircraft was out of control & the G forces so great the crew were pinned & couldn't move, the bravery of these young boys was at another level.
    Lest we forget

  • @garybradford8332
    @garybradford8332 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I love this series for its authentic details like the pre flight checks, the burning of oil on the runways and the post flight "interrrogations", i.e. debriefings, and hands stuck to the frozen guns. These are details not usually shown in previous films. It gives me a much better idea of what it was like. About those bombs dropped in the Channel. There are 500,000 unexploded "items" on its sea bottom including dropped bombs and mines from WWI and WWII. An unexploded Nazi bomb was found in an English garden just a month ago. The evacuation of 3000 people from Plymouth, and along the route taken to destroy the bomb safely, was their largest civilian evacuation since WWII. My father served in the Army Air Corp but had to lie about his age to join in 1946. He served in Korea and occupied Japan.

  • @joshuawells835
    @joshuawells835 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I had three great grandfathers who served in WWII. One was a dental hygienist for the navy, one served in the field artillery and was in the unit that liberated Dachau, and one was in the Army Air Corps stationed in Burma.

    • @joshuawells835
      @joshuawells835 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lucasgrey9794 I think you are the one who was lied to.

  • @allaboutthecookies9642
    @allaboutthecookies9642 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My grandpa was a gunner on a b17 in WW2… he survived thankfully, but never spoke about it.

  • @j00jy
    @j00jy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The actor that plays Lemmons (the main mechanic) is Jude law's son. Kid looks just like his dad and I can't unsee it after I found out. He's good in this show and I hope this launches him a nice career.

    • @InfiniteStates
      @InfiniteStates 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ahhh I did think 'god that guy looks like Jude Law'. Now I know why lol

  • @EdiCemalovic
    @EdiCemalovic 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I'm telling you, this going be crazy ride in the air! "Band of Brothers" and "The Pacific" were amazing reaction on PiB. It was intense, emotional, and all around the series! HERE WE GO!!

    • @yourlifeisagreatstory
      @yourlifeisagreatstory 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Wonder what her reaction to Generation Kill would be like? Haha.

    • @NecramoniumVideo
      @NecramoniumVideo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Except this series has none of that, was not expecting much but i barely wanna continue watching. Huge BoB fan, but this series has none of what made that show good.

    • @ggegeRGr
      @ggegeRGr 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Except this show sucks in comparison.

    • @diegoledezma4045
      @diegoledezma4045 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yourlifeisagreatstoryshe’d be horrified lmao

    • @salto1994
      @salto1994 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@NecramoniumVideo you can't compare both of them, it's different

  • @jakubfabisiak9810
    @jakubfabisiak9810 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Fun fact: Remember the A-4 Skyhawk? The little planes the instructors used in Top Gun? One of those, can carry a heavier bombload, than a B-17.

    • @Ryan_Christopher
      @Ryan_Christopher 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not quite. The Skyhawk can carry an equal payload of 8,000 lbs, not more.
      Today the F-15E Strike Eagle is being tested to carry fifteen 500-pound JDAMs under the Agile Combat Eagle Program. That’s a payload of 7,500 lbs.

  • @duanetelesha
    @duanetelesha 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Main German flak gun is referred too as an eighty eight (88) and they had a lot of them. Norden Bomb sight, manufactured in Connecticut. After two plus years, you still have awesome reactions and still love them.

  • @javierroque2259
    @javierroque2259 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    so happy you are watching the series

  • @davidneel8327
    @davidneel8327 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Two movies about WW2 bombers you may find interesting. "Command Decision" with Clark Gable and "12'0 Clock High" with Greogry Peck. About B-17 bomber groups. There was also a tv series titled "12'0 Clock High". A WW2 I recommend is "Victory at Sea" made in the 50's. Most episodes are about the US but some do talk about other allies.

  • @jeri3808
    @jeri3808 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Cassie, air breathing machines can only fly so high. That's why the Germans set their flak guns for that altitude. Interrogation is basically debriefing after a mission.

    • @jsbrads1
      @jsbrads1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      At this point in technology, they aren’t flying at the air breathing ceiling. A more efficient engine can provide enough to fly higher.
      I was under the impression the Flak gunners were able to estimate their elevation and try to shoot to that elevation. But it wasn’t a very good science.

  • @TheFalconerNZ
    @TheFalconerNZ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The height the bombers didn't matter to avoid anti-aircraft flak as the cannon shells had timers on them so they would explode at the right height, the flak crews could work out how high they were flying & set the timer on the shells. Later in the war the shells were equipped with proximity detonators that would detonate when the shells close to an aircraft. While aircrews had a lower survival rate than other services they did have the luxury of returning home base after their missions & having a warm dry bed to sleep in & hot meals.

  • @jameswg13
    @jameswg13 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Crosby actually navigated the norway mission so well he inadvertently got a medal for it what he called a medal from pure luck.
    His delayed turn and responses meant they hit the Uboat pens at Lunchtime. So the Norwegian workers were mostly off the site and the germams going through a big shift change were on the site.
    The Norwegian resistance thought the americans had deliberately timed it perfectly, and the message got all the way back to the 100th

  • @kentbarnes1955
    @kentbarnes1955 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks for doing this series. Up front I'll say this series sits between BoB (best series ever) and The Pacific. You've obviously already picked up on the fact air combat is WAY DIFFERENT that fighting on the ground. It seems so odd that after a "mission" these guys go back to relative normality...bunks to sleep in, hot meals, and evening entertainment. For this luxury they are blessed with having the greatest odds of dying of any member of the armed forces. The 8th Air Force in Europe suffered more casualties than the entire US Marine Corp. in the Pacific. The fighting is BRUTAL. You did a fine job keeping up....and I know others here in the comments have answered the bulk of your questions. I look forward to your review of Episode 3.

  • @MarcoMM1
    @MarcoMM1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great reaction Cassie like always. I like that is actor that portrait Lt. Harry Crosby (The guy that is always throwing up) the narrator of this series, and the real Lt. Harry Crosby was a author and writer of many books and stories about the 100th bomb group, and the producers use many of his stories as material for this series. In his book 'A Wing and a Prayer: The "Bloody 100Th' Harry H Crosby stresses how incompetent he felt leading the group to Tronheim. All the congradulations he received after the mission left him dismayed. Being switched from Brady's crew to Blakely's was the best thing that could happen to him. Blakely was all about practice. Every day they would fly practice missions to and from Scotland. Sometimes just an individual aeroplane and sometimes in formation with other Forts. Soon Crosby worked out the kinks and built up his confidence. Not only him, but the whole outfit. By the end of the War he was regarded as the best navigator in the whole eighth army air corps. And a heads up dont watch the end credits of the episodes as they show the upcoming episode it may spoil some things. Keep up the good work.

    • @jimandaud
      @jimandaud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To this day the U-boat pens at Trondheim exist. They were too well-built to be destroyed after the war, so the Norwegians built over the top of them. German construction was built for a "thousand year Reich."

  • @allynvannoy4743
    @allynvannoy4743 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Flak. Anti-aircraft (AA) guns - 88mm (others bigger and smaller). I was able to interview a German gun crewmen 3 years ago. He was just 16 years old when he crewed a gun. Some target areas had as many as 1,000 AA guns to protect them. Over 1 million Axis personnel were involved in the Reich's air defense.

  • @CaesiusX
    @CaesiusX 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thanks for doing this show. And I hope you feel better soon.

  • @thegreatgambino5079
    @thegreatgambino5079 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great job as always, girl! I've been following you for years and this is one of your best yet! But I'm also just really loving Masters of the Air. Can't wait for your next reaction!

  • @emperor_napoleon
    @emperor_napoleon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’ve been waiting for your reactions on this Cassie! Im already on episode 8 and I’m looking forward to your reaction😊

  • @mr.e1026
    @mr.e1026 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    My grandfather served in WW2 in the South Pacific. He was 3nd generation German so he was sent to the South Pacific as a cavalry flak gunner to shoot down aircrafts.
    He had quite the knowledge of aircraft tactics. On the other side of the war, in Europe, B-17s did a fairly big job of dropping bombs on military targets. Before grandpa entered the service (he was drafted at 17) the B-17s were tasked with flying over occupied territory, dropping bombs, and getting out of there. They had P-51 escorts, fighter planes, but their range made them have to turn back to base prematurely. That was when Axis forces sent their planes in, and there was a lot of B-17s shot down after their escorts returned to base. One way this was fixed was with the invention of the 200 US gallon drop tanks they put on the P-51's. Like grandpa said, the Nazis probably pissed their pants when the bombers still had their fighter escorts with them. The P-51s were superior fighters to the Axis Messerschmidt 109s.
    In the South Pacific, they had fewer bombers, but the ones they were using were B-24's and B-29's due to their longer range. They weren't just flying across the English Channel. Many of them did their work, and then landed in China.
    Cassie asked why don't they go higher. Planes don't have the luxury of high altitude flight. The air is too thin for the engines to properly work at high altitudes, and the planes themselves were not pressurized. You'll notice the crew wearing masks. That was so they could breathe.
    Cassie asked "Why did that pilot drop his bombs over the channel?" He lost at least one engine. In order to stay in the air, the bombs were likely dropped and not armed because they're heavy. A B-17 can fly with 2 engines out, provided the wings are still intact, even if the 2 engines are both on the same side. They can't stay in the air with a full payload though if even one engine goes out, even if the reason it went out was due to mechanical failure, and not because it was shot.
    "What am I in for? What am I watching?" Cassie, you may not appreciate this the same way I do, but the fact of the matter is, you're watching it, and you understand, while this is based off real events, it really isn't all that far from the truth. WW2 was unlike any war ever fought at the time. Technology was at a peak where the bombs were huge, there were planes that were several times faster than the next worst war (WWI) guns that were more powerful, with extended ranges, and weapons technology was unlike anything ever dreamed of, but yet, not so advanced that bayonets weren't fairly heavily used. So hang in there. It may not be pleasant, or have a bunch of random love stories in it like other movies, that is an unfortunate downside of reality, though.
    It's interesting that Cassie speaks of the mechanical failure part, as there have been 4 of them that she's recounted... That was where the term "gremlins" came from. When something wasn't working as it should, they referred to as gremlins in the works. I suspect this was the progenitor term for SNAFU's and FUBAR's later. (SNAFU = Situation Normal All Fucked Up and FUBAR = Fucked Up Beyond All Recognition).

  • @ColdWarShot
    @ColdWarShot 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’ve had the pleasure of flying on a B-17 twice (Nine-O-Nine). I wish I could describe the experience, abs wish you could experience witnessing a B-17 fire up, warm up and take off. Such a beautiful and awe inspiring sight.

  • @ronniecoleman2342
    @ronniecoleman2342 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Watching this is like watching a color version of the Gregory Peck movie Twelve o clock high. Its an excellent movie about the leadership and problems facing the groups.

  • @jp1170
    @jp1170 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The alternative to slowing down to stick with Curts crew would have been to keep flying at their normal speed, which would mean Curts plane would fall behind and almost certainly get picked off by German fighters. The whole point of them flying in formation is all of the other planes around you theoretically help protect you and cover each other with their machine guns.

    • @jsbrads1
      @jsbrads1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s right. An individual airplane will often be approached by a fighter from an angle that only one gun can shoot at it. Two more planes nearby can can triple if not more the number of guns that hit a fighter plane, and they can usually get even better angles on the attacking plane.

  • @jcorbett9620
    @jcorbett9620 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The shot of the 2 Fortresses nearly colliding in cloud, was unfortunately a very common occurence. There were so many USAAF bases in Eastern England that when the aircraft took off for a mission, the chances of collision were extremely high, expecially in poor/low visibility. Many crew and bombers were lost due to mid-air collisions in poor weather. I read an autobiograthy of a B-17 Flight Engineer (I think it was Combat Crew by John Comer) who took off over the burning remains of 2 of his Groups planes who had crashed at the end of the runway with full fuel and bomb loads in thick fog, due to not reaching full take-off speed before the runway ran out. Men were lost even before they reached the enemy coast.

  • @Rangera-ct1xu
    @Rangera-ct1xu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    having flown Bombers and tankers in the Air Force for 23 years. yes, air crew are very calm during an emergency, they have to handle the problem. when they survive, and on the ground afterwords they can let all the fear and emotion out. if you ever listen to black boxes from a plane crash, you will hear the crew very professional and calm right up to the impact.

    • @squint04
      @squint04 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your service!

  • @redbikerdude
    @redbikerdude 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    There is an annual summer festival of aeroplanes in Oshkosh, Wisconsin called Airventure. You'd be able to see, walk into B17s and even take a joy flight in one. You would get a better appreciation of these amazing aircraft when you can see them in person. If you do, please take us on your excursion. I would love to see your reaction to it.

    • @dzed9191
      @dzed9191 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or she could tour a Lancaster Bomber in her home province in Canada at Nanton or in Hamilton Ontario where there are numerous Second World War 2 aircraft to tour and fly in.

  • @bradleybratten4436
    @bradleybratten4436 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    With regard to your comment about them being calm during the wheel's up landing; there is a saying amongst pilots in an emergency that the three priorities are Aviate, Navigate, Communicate. Meaning fly the plane and stay in control, Find the safest place to put down, and contact others/authorities that can be of assistance. You execute these activities rather than losing your cool to ensure the best outcome.

  • @MrDonJBerg
    @MrDonJBerg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My college math teacher was in the ball. Ask "How did you end up there???" He said, "We all showed up...they had us line up tallest to shortest...and I was the shortest.." All he said was you basically had to shoot WAY in advance of a fighter..and hope they ran into it..

  • @Keithjmcc
    @Keithjmcc 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Lonesome Dove. You will just love it.

  • @jackson857
    @jackson857 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So glad you reacted to this series Cassie. Means a lot.

  • @Rangera-ct1xu
    @Rangera-ct1xu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    any landing you can walk away from is a good landing. any landing where they get to use the plane again is an outstanding landing.

  • @daddynitro199
    @daddynitro199 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The flak cannons were rather versatile. They were used for antiaircraft fire like this, indirect fire like the guns at Brecourt in Band of Brothers, and for direct fire like in Bastogne. A truly devious technology of the time.

    • @facubeitches1144
      @facubeitches1144 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They could kill bombers 25,000 feet in the air, and tanks 2,000+ yards away on the ground.

    • @daddynitro199
      @daddynitro199 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adamscott7354 6000 flak rounds were cheaper than a ball bearing factory. More easily replaced as well, I imagine.

    • @robderich8533
      @robderich8533 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Tiger tank's main armament was developed from the well-known 8.8 cm FlaK 36/37 anti-aircraft gun. So yes, these cannons were indeed very versatile.

    • @Scuzzlebutt142
      @Scuzzlebutt142 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@robderich8533 I believe it was after the Battle of France, where they discovered that there standard anti tank guns couldn't knock out French Tanks, Rommel pressed some 88s he had in service to knock them out, so an anti tank version was developed, as well as the main Gun on the Tiger and KonigsTiger (Tiger II).

    • @jimandaud
      @jimandaud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Flak weapons had timed fuses, so they could be adjusted to the height window of the bomber group. Germans had rudimentary radar to help but fighters would also relay altitude info so they could be hit outbound from the drop. My dad (B24 tailgunner in the 15th AF) even wrote in his memoir of a ghost B24 flying under their group on a mission. In that case, the German plane was under a USAAF 24 when they dropped bombs and was destroyed.

  • @warspaniel
    @warspaniel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your comment at the end of episode one about "...if they hit one part of your plane, you're done for" reminded me of something I read about the allies trying to reinforce the bombers to improve survivability. At first, they studied the planes that came back and saw all the holes in the planes, so they started improving the armor in those locations...but they quickly found out that THAT was ineffective. Then someone (I don't recall who) pointed out that they were solving the wrong problem. Since they were looking at all the holes on the planes that made it back, they were looking at the locations that the planes could take hits and still survive. They needed to figure out where the planes that WEREN'T COMING BACK were getting hit, and improve the armor plating at those locations.

  • @PHDiaz-vv7yo
    @PHDiaz-vv7yo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is why I finally subscribed. Watched Ep 8 last night. The series is an emotional Hail Mary

  • @StuartKoehl
    @StuartKoehl 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Norden Bombsight was a remarkable electro-mechanical computer that used gyroscopes and a pair of optical reticles linked to the bomber's autopilot. As the plane approach the target, the pilot trimmed the aircraft to fly at the required atltitude, while the bombardier actually controlled the course of plane through the bomb sight. When the target lined up in bombsight, the bombardier released the bombs. In theory, when everything worked right, it could drop a 500-lb bomb within a 100-yard circle from a height of 20,000 feet. In reality, nothing ever went right--either there was flak, or fighters, or clouds, or the winds weren't right, which meant the theoretical accuracy was never achieved in combat. The average median error radius (a circle in which half of all the bombs dropped would fall) in Europe was 1000 yards.

  • @mattconner6416
    @mattconner6416 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    A lot of people don't realize the US Air Force was founded in 1947 after the war. The US Army Air Corps was the predecessor to the Air Force.

    • @rbaldino
      @rbaldino 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      True, but the Air Corps became the Army Air Force right before the war started.

    • @Manolo0528
      @Manolo0528 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Army Air Corps became the Army Air Force in 1940. It was more than a name change. Instead of being a tool of the ground forces they were now a semi-independent organization with its own commanding general who had an equal voice in military operations as the Army Chief of Staff an Chief of Naval Operations. They became a completely independent organization, U S Air Force, after the war.

  • @captwrecked
    @captwrecked 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    22 years Air Force. In an emergency, there is nothing more reassuring than a calm steady voice. We train for that.

  • @01HondaS2kXD
    @01HondaS2kXD 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    A decidedly unfun fact is that the Norden bombsight they talked about as being nearly as secretive as the nuclear bomb was basically a sham. It was not anywhere NEAR as accurate as it was made out to be at the time. However, under the assumption that they needed daylight to accurately use the useless bombsight, they continued to conduct their bombing raids in the day which contributed to the appalling number of casualties you’ve already seen in this show.

    • @rbaldino
      @rbaldino 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      That, and the company that made the bomb site concocted the whole secrecy thing to make it seem more important. There was at least one better bomb site that didn't get selected by the government.

    • @NecramoniumVideo
      @NecramoniumVideo 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And they made the Brits look incompetent in the show while the US had so many casualties.

    • @Scuzzlebutt142
      @Scuzzlebutt142 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rbaldinoDidn't help that Germany had drawings of one in 1938, and got one in 1940, so not very secret at all.
      I can understand the RAF decision to switch to Night time bombing, especially after the Blitz. Though they did continue to develop techniques to be far more accurate, with Lead bomber techniques, flares and such.

    • @Chris-ji4iu
      @Chris-ji4iu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They (the higher ups) knew it was a war of attrition - so much so that on D-Day there were almost no German planes in the air.

    • @StuartKoehl
      @StuartKoehl 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      After the war was over, an RAF bomber pilot was in a pub, drinking with an American bomber pilot. He summed up the situation succinctly and accurately. "We area bombed area targets, and you area bombed precision targets". Considering the CEP for daylight bombing in Europe was on the order of 1000 meters on a good day, precision bombing was an urban legend.

  • @ytorwoody
    @ytorwoody 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Being that you previously reacted to Band of Brothers, Saving Private Ryan, and The Pacific, there is a bit of information that you might be interested in. As horrendous as the casualties were for the men on the ground, the 8th Air Force in Europe had more casualties than the Marines did in the Pacific. When I heard that the airmen had to make 25 missions (then raised to 30) before being able to return stateside, initially to me, it didn't sound like that many. Considering that they were often suffering near 10% losses on early missions, that means that the survivors would have seen all of their original friends be replaced two to three times, by their 30th mission.

    • @simonbarabash2151
      @simonbarabash2151 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The reason for the 25 was that statistically the chances were close to zero, so if a crew managed to beat the odds and survive then may as well send them home. It was raised to 30 as the odds of survival went up

    • @jimandaud
      @jimandaud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes. The average survival rate was 10 missions. My dad was shot down and captured on his 10th. He had turned 19 a couple of weeks prior.

  • @Elephant2024-wi2li
    @Elephant2024-wi2li 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thankful to all of the Greatest Generation for their wonderful bravery and supreme sacrifices. Without which we would not be here today enjoying this great channel.

  • @danjmcs
    @danjmcs 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The book this is based on is fantastic, heart-breaking and just amazing... Ep9 and the finale is coming up this week and looking forward to it... enjoy the ride!

  • @williambranch4283
    @williambranch4283 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The first model plane I made as a boy was a B17.

  • @Ryan_Christopher
    @Ryan_Christopher 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The “Exec” in “Air Exec” stands for “Executive Officer,” who’s Second-in-Command of the Wing. Normally XO is a Major’s job.
    You’ve been made familiar with the job from Band of Brothers. It’s the job Capt. Dick Winters got promoted to in 2nd Battalion after Market Garden. That was the last time he fired his weapon and got to do paperwork, typewriting after-action reports with those flashbacks, while 1Lt. Moose Heiliger took command of Easy.
    Here Buck got demoted to Squadron Commander while the other Squadron Commander got promoted to Air Exec. Air Force Squadrons, past and present, are roughly analogous to Army Companies.

  • @richardarmstrong6513
    @richardarmstrong6513 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I live 10 mins from Thorpe Abbotts base. The museum is a wonderful place to visit to learn more and pay respects to the men.

  • @stevecholewczynski6308
    @stevecholewczynski6308 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    British soldiers resented the Americans because they were popular with British women.The saying was "The problem with the Yanks is they're overpaid,over sexed and over here".

  • @jameswg13
    @jameswg13 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ken lemmons played by jude Laws son was actually 21 and a master sergeant by that point not a corporal but he was an exceptionally highly rated Crew chief oh and also already married

  • @joemckim1183
    @joemckim1183 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Austin Butler is such a great actor, probably my favorite actor who's emerged in the last 5 years.

  • @arclite58
    @arclite58 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Two reasons for dumping unused bombs: In the event of a crash landing, the bombs could detonate inside the plane; Secondly, planes only carry enough fuel to make it to their destination. The plane would be too heavy & wouldn’t have enough fuel to make it back to base.
    Even today when you get on a plane, they calculate the average weight of passengers & cargo, only carry enough fuel to make their destination, maybe a tiny bit more for an alternate nearby landing site in case of emergency.

    • @MaikeruNeko
      @MaikeruNeko 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There's no "maybe" for the alternate fuel, it is always carried. Airlines always have enough fuel on board for loiter time and a diversion to an alternate airport. Not doing so will get you in BIG trouble with the FAA or similar.

  • @jsbrads1
    @jsbrads1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    19 yr old mechanic back then. The teenage mechanics today were advising engineers how to improve the Osprey.

  • @martensjd
    @martensjd 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No dramamine. It looks like that was first marketed (and maybe first available) in 1949. Remember in Band of Brothers Blithe said the airsickness medication (whatever it was) knocked him out and made him sleepy when he got to the ground. So that would be one more thing air crew would not be likely to use.
    Cassie: welcome! I'm very glad to see you here, since you always do a great job with reactions. Rumor has it that after episode 9 there will be a documentary, maybe like "We Fought Alone Together." I hope you react to that.

  • @HammerJammer81
    @HammerJammer81 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One thing to keep in mind was that these Aircraft when first produced and used (during these episodes) were flying coffins. It was 50/50 whether the A/C would get you or the enemy. First and foremost were the Engines. The early versions were just as likely top blow themselves up with them.

  • @stevewadman4166
    @stevewadman4166 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    You got to be kidding me Bremen goddamn Bremen for their first mission

    • @SoloRenegade
      @SoloRenegade 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      it didn't have the reputation then.

    • @adamscott7354
      @adamscott7354 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And then its on to "Flak City" St Nazaire as the next stop on the tour!

  • @acehole727
    @acehole727 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If you haven't been told already the reason they had to drop the bombs before landing is it was to dangerous to land with them and also the added weight on return would consume more fuel which wasn't planned for and may not have enough to make it back to the airfield.

    • @bigmikem1578
      @bigmikem1578 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They can also move faster with less weight.

  • @McPh1741
    @McPh1741 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Over 4700 B-17 bombers were lost in combat during WW2. That’s just B-17s. You watched “The Pacific.” There were more airmen casualties over Europe than Marines in the Pacific theater. So far there hasn’t been a miniseries made to show the hell the sailors went through in the Navy.

    • @StuartKoehl
      @StuartKoehl 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's a little known fact that the Army Air Force lost more than 15,000 men killed in training accidents, before they ever got to fly a single mission in combat.

  • @marygoodson4920
    @marygoodson4920 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fighting American who said "Never fight with the Irish" is Barry Keoghan, who actually is Irish. Great actor. He starred in Saltburn and in real life is a boxer.

  • @johnnieangel99
    @johnnieangel99 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You were thinking about fighter planes where they have one or two man crews. The old school Heavy Bombers carried usually ten men into battle. The crews that flew over Europe did so with places that were pressurized like the B-29. Flying that high a man could freeze quickly as it was about -40f as well as C. Not to mention what would happen if they touched anything metal without gloves. As was shown when the tail gunner removed his gloves.
    Not only can the flack guns mess up your day with a lucky hit. When the shell explodes, it sends shrapnel {little bits of metal} flying all over the place. Not the kind of thing that is good for an engine nor the thin aluminum skin of the plane itself.
    Your question about which would be better. Flying or being a soldier is a good one. Best part for the pilots when they got home to their base they were pretty much safe and had nice beds and decent food. Soldiers were not so lucky.
    you also forgot, Sailors. Who were pretty well off, unless they were actually in battle.
    why were they so condescending? The USAAC at the time was drawing a lot of interest from the local women.

  • @marksabottke338
    @marksabottke338 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    FYI - The bombers were flying at altitudes where the temperature was minus thirty degrees or more! Instant Frost bite was a concern. The flight suits in some cases were electrically heated. Flying above 10,000 feet oxygen was needed. Average missions were flown around 15-24,000 feet. Most of the bullets fired at the bombers were at least the size of your thumb! Once a bomber was hit and falling to crash the "G" forces could impair your ability to parachute to safety, trapping you in the plane due to these forces!

    • @jsbrads1
      @jsbrads1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A falling plane might get you to zero G, so you would have to crawl thru like astronauts do in the space station.

    • @marksabottke338
      @marksabottke338 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're correct, there are variable "G" forces in play, that's why I used "Could" vs. "Would" impair or trap you in the plane. Just like the famous vomit comet to replicate zero gravity.

  • @coyotej4895
    @coyotej4895 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have a love hate relationship with this series. One of my grandfather's flew a B17 from 42-45. He was hit multiple times and lost many crew members, but he was one of the few that flew back home in the verry same plain he flew over in. Granted nearly entirely rebuilt. As a teen I got to read some of his journals he kept. I was blissfully unaware of the real truth behind the numbers he talked about in those pages. One bomber, tail number xxxxxxxx named xxxxxx was ten men, ten brothers fathers sons uncles. and today we lost thirty bombers. I cannot help but tear up every episode. However, it should NOT be antiseptic or sterile. We must know the real coast because there are still those in power that think they can use the world like their own chess bord. Use people and lives as fodder to their own greed. We have learned nothing, and I get a knot in my stomach looking at the state of the world today knowing that so many sacrificed for this? I am glad my grandfathers are not alive to see what the west is becoming. We may have wone the war, but politicians are destroying us from within now because we did not learn from history that any government is either controlled by its people or the people are slaves to that government.

  • @felixlersha
    @felixlersha 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This series gets off to a slow start but definitely builds nicely. I appreciate it showing some different elements to WWII to the BoB and Pacific series, and not just aerial combat.

  • @JamesGilburt-lb7sg
    @JamesGilburt-lb7sg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi Cassie, I'm buzzin' you've gotten into aerial warfare, it's my favourite kind of war as it's easily the most exciting and entertaining to watch. It's my thing, I love anything to do with the war in the air and I loved your reactions to the first 2 episodes and i'm glad you're enjoying it :) i's excellent you're seeing war from this perspective. I'm loving this series and everything about it so far; the combat, the effects, the acting :) and if Steven Spielberg & Tom Hanks is involved, you just know it's going to be epic! I'm about 2 thirds the way through watching on Apple TV at the time of writing this & I don't want the show to end. Yes those that fought in the air had it much worse in combat than those on the ground, so the greater the risk the greater the reward. And it's about time a depiction of air war was put out there, I feel that this aspect of war has been overlooked for too long. I can't wait for your continued reactions to this awesome series :) you have to react to Memphis Belle (1990) as a follow up please - it flew in a different bomb group but it's based on the true story of the first US Army Air Corps B17 bomber plane crew's 25th and final mission of their tour of duty in Europe during WWII. It's essential react-to material :) as is Red Tails (2012) also based on a true story: Of the first African American pilots in the US Air Force during WWII :) George Lucas the star wars guy did the CGI visual effects for that! Please react to that too. Lots of love, our beautiful kernel queen, I hope you're feeling better soon. x

  • @igloo2158
    @igloo2158 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Can’t land with bombs armed. Too dangerous. Also Cassie, if you like this series there’s a really good movie from 1990 called “Memphis Belle”. It was the first B17 bomber crew attempting to finish the final 25th mission. Really great cast. Has a lot of heart.

    • @iainmorrison1592
      @iainmorrison1592 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Love the Memphis Belle movie

  • @ApolloCDR
    @ApolloCDR 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At about 13:25 Cassie states that she was thinking these were single seat planes and she is surprised how big the b-17s are. As an airplane enthusiast and a pilot myself I was also under the same impression for a long time. I'm fortunate enough to live outside of Eglin Air Force Base in Florida . Outside of the base, is the Air Force Armament Museum and there they have a collection of various Air Force Planes from almost every era of military flight. Right out front is a B-17 Flying Fortress, and i was quite shocked to realize how SMALL and fragile it looks! It really is hard to conceive that aircraft taking on multiple fighter attacks and flak barrages and all of the stories and film footage show how much damage they could take and still make it back to their airbases. The courage and skill of these incredibly young and brave aircrews is even more impressive once you see one of these "giant" aerial tanks.

  • @Maverick25ish
    @Maverick25ish 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think back in the day they only had and used VHF radio, VHF only has a range of about 100 miles maybe more depending on atmospheric conditions, but thats why the towers didnt have communication with their planes until they got close

  • @jobanh7ify
    @jobanh7ify 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The bombs were dropped in the channel for fuel consumption, the planes would remain heavy on the way back to base consuming more fuel. About not going higher to avoid enemy fire it would be impossible to reach the target without flying through flak.

  • @Armageddon2077
    @Armageddon2077 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You should also try and watch the movie 'Red Tails (2012)' to learn a bit more about other American pilots who served at this time

  • @warspaniel
    @warspaniel 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't know if anyone else answered your question from around the 18:45 mark: They had to drop the bombs over the channel to drop weight so they had enough fuel to get back to base. Planes are given enough fuel to complete the mission -- round trip to and from the target location(s) -- with a little extra "just in case". The amount of fuel required is calculated assuming that the planes return lighter (i.e., they've dropped their payloads [bombs] on target). So, in order to have enough fuel to get back home, the bombs HAVE to be dropped.

  • @billtisch3698
    @billtisch3698 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I like that "maths" exchange. Ask why they say maths and they answer, "You say physics, don't you? You wouldn't say physic would you?" English and Americans. Two peoples divided by a common language.

    • @Scuzzlebutt142
      @Scuzzlebutt142 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Add Canadians, Australians, and New Zealanders to that, and you have 5 peoples speaking technically the same language, with their own unique twists :)

    • @peterireland4344
      @peterireland4344 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Scuzzlebutt142 Yeah except the Canadians, Aussies and New Zealanders (and some Americans) were all in the RAF :)

    • @dzed9191
      @dzed9191 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@peterireland4344 some were in the RAF. Canada had over 30 RCAF squadrons, Australia had the RAAF and New Zealand the RNZAF with their own squadrons. Same with the Poles, South Africans and others.

    • @peterireland4344
      @peterireland4344 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dzed9191 Correct. In that theatre, all of those (RAAF, RCAF etc) operated under Bomber Command. There were also all-Australian, all-Canadian, all Polish etc. squadrons in the RAF proper, and many entire crews of various nationalities within regular RAF squadrons. It's fascinating to look at a list of the personnel of 617 squadron, for example!

  • @BigAl53750
    @BigAl53750 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey Cassie, just so you know, the RAF bombers flew bombing missions at night. When the Americans arrived, the Germans were getting bombed night and day.
    There were ten men in each plane in Flying Fortresses, and seven men in the British heavy bombers. Flak is the name for exploding anti-aircraft shells. The word comes from a German word they used to name their main anti-aircraft guns.
    That word was; fliegerabwehrkanone, which means; aircraft defence cannon. They shortened the word to FLAK by taking these latters from the longer word, like so:-
    FLiegerAbwehrKanone. Taking the capitals from the word, we get; FLAK. Flak guns fired shells that were 88 millimetres in diameter and 571mm long. Each shell weighed from 9.6, to 10kg and were set to explode when they reached a certain height. You’ve seen Band of Brothers and what German artillery did to the trees at Bastogne. The guns that did that, were the same kind of guns, just being used against ground units, instead of planes. That gives you some idea of what kind of damage FLAK could do. A shell didn’t have to hit a plane, just explode nearby. The skins of the planes were not thick steel, but thin aluminium, so you can imagine what it was like. They were amazing young men. Simply amazing.
    My Dad was in an RAF bomber squadron, but he was accepted into Med school and spent the war becoming a Doctor in Northern Ireland. Errol Flynn’s father was one of his professors. He met my Mum in Postwar Germany. She was an RAF nurse.

  • @jamielandis4308
    @jamielandis4308 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The writers lifted a good bit of the first episode from “Memphis Belle.” You really should watch it; I know you’d like it.

  • @Airwolf515
    @Airwolf515 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cassie, there are many aircraft types in the military: fighter, attackers, bombers, cargo, gunship, AWAC, and etc. Within a couple of the categories, there are more aircraft classification. For instance, during WW2, in the fighter classification, there were two types of fighters: 1) fighter and 2) heavy fighter. WW2 fighters were usually single-engine aircraft like the German Messerschimitt Bf109, the Allied air force's main nemesis, and later you will see the North American P-51 Mustang, which you have already seen in the movie "Saving Private Ryan" where a pair of Mustang planes fly over the bridge after blowing up the Tiger tank. Heavy fighters were planes with two engines with minimum two crews like the Messerschimitt Me110. The exception was the Lockheed P-38 Lighting, which was a two-engine heavy fighter operated by a single crew. Later in the war, German Fighter General Adolf Galland introduced another type of fighter, Fighter Destroyer. According to his memoir, the sole purpose of Fighter Destroyer was to shoot down the heavy strategic bombers like the B-17 and B-24.
    The aircraft the show centers on is Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, which is classified as a bomber. You can identify the type of aircraft by it's classification, "B" for bomber. This classification is still used in present day. Currently for fighters, the ID is "F" like F-14 Tomcat and F/A-18 Hornet, the two featured jet fighters in "Top Gun" and "Top Gun: Maverick", respectively. However, U.S. Army Airforce (USAAF) fighters were designated with "P" for Pursuit at the time of WW2. Whereas the U.S. Navy already used the "F" for fighter like the Grumman F4F Wildcat or the F6F Hellcat.
    You noticed the B-17 is a big plane. It has a crew of 10 men (pilot, co-pilot, bombardier, navigator, radio operator, top turret gunner, ball turret (bottom) gunner, two-side door gunners, and tail gunner). Whenever a B-17 doesn't come back to base, 10 men are lost. On the first mission, 15 bombers were lost. 150 airmen are gone.
    The top secret device mentioned in the show was the Norden Bombsight. At the time, it was the most advanced bombsight that used analog computer which constantly recalculated the bomb's impact point based on changing flight conditions, and an autopilot that reacted quickly and accurately to changes in wind direction and other adverse effects. To ensure the secrecy of the bombsight design, the U.S. military made a very strict protocol to remove the device from the bombers after each mission and keep it in storage until it is needed for the next mission. The storage was closely guarded by military police on the airbase. Bombardier were even instructed to destroy the bombsight before they can bail out of their damaged bomber. German spies in England tried to get their hands on the device. Fortunately, they failed.

  • @kevindown1592
    @kevindown1592 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Lemons, the mechanic, is played by Jude Law’s son. Also, Rosie’s grandson plays a navigator in the second episode.

  • @mwhyte1979
    @mwhyte1979 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The 100th Bomb Groud soon earned the nickname "The Bloody 100th". Oddly enough that while the 100th didn't actually suffer the worst casualty rate of the 8th Air Force bomber groups, they seemed to always wind up in the middle of all the disastrous missions and gained a reputation as a cursed unit.

  • @dan1273
    @dan1273 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The European air campaign was positively brutal. Especially early on. We had brass that didn't think sending fighter escorts with the bombers was a priority, that we only needed large bomber formations to cover each other. As a result, R&D into fighters that could stick with the bombers for their whole run was shunned by the brass.
    Later in the war, thankfully, more sensible heads prevailed,

  • @dantehill4748
    @dantehill4748 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This has been a really good series so far. As a veteran of Afghanistan I recommend you watch The Outpost. It seems to be severely underrated. Also another great series to watch is Generation Kill.

    • @jimandaud
      @jimandaud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Outpost is fantastic. True story done very well.

    • @dantehill4748
      @dantehill4748 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jimandaud plus a couple of the guys play themselves. It's just the most accurate, imo, Hollywood war movie I've seen in recent years.

    • @jimandaud
      @jimandaud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dantehill4748 What?! I did not know that. Have to watch it again. Thanks.

  • @saaamember97
    @saaamember97 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Welcome to the story of the USAAC (United States Army Air Corps). We became the United States Air Force, after enactment of the National Security Act of 1947, which made the USAAC it's own military force, separate from the U.S. Army. I am proud to have served for 20 years in the U.S.A.F. (1977-1997) and would do it all over again, if they'd let me ..... Especially for all you grateful young Americans!

  • @sudsy7131
    @sudsy7131 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My grandfather enlisted in 41. Sargent Major. Navigator and radio

  • @megmolkate
    @megmolkate 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    12 o’clock high starring Gregory Peck is a very good movie about flying bombers in the Second World War. Forget Memphis Bell (the Hollywood version anyway). The is an army documentary made during the war called Memphis Belle story of a Flying Fortress which is quite good as well.

  • @geeebuttersnap2433
    @geeebuttersnap2433 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cassie: “their quarters where they stay immediately look nicer than the guys in the pacific. They were just staying in mud.”
    lol, that is the difference between the Air Force and the Marines.

  • @tomobedlam3094
    @tomobedlam3094 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That was my Grandpa's job; Navigator.
    Sitting at a table thirty thousand feet in the air with a map and some pencils

    • @Ryan_Christopher
      @Ryan_Christopher 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Map and Pencils useless without Compass, Stopwatch, Protractor, and Ruler. Don’t forget those.

    • @jimandaud
      @jimandaud 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What a job! My dad's nav had to get the crews from Greenland to The Azores. Bring both up on Google Earth and it's amazing to consider the skill needed to find the little specks of earth in the Atlantic.