Stackelberg Duopoly Model in Hindi

[@manoj99208]

Thanku so much sir ! youtube pe asia koi nahi padata jise apne padaya!!!!! Thanku again!!!?

[@ammarakhan7792]

I am pursuing MA(economics) and I wanted videos for my study preparation and I randomly found your videos. Your way of explanation is very best sir. Your explanation help me a lot. Bht bht Jazakallah sir.

[@DrNavedClasses]

Tons of thanks Ammara

[@mudassirnawaz6298]

Me also

[@mdalquamahussain7408]

From where are you pursuing your ma (eco)..?

[@naziaajabajab2015]

Sir your way of teaching is so amazing and explain each and every concept. May Allah gives you health, wealth and prosper life. Ameen

[@DrNavedClasses]

Jazakallah khair nazia

[@rinkyyadav8918]

Love u sir.......❤
Amazing ...... love the way u teach....

[@DrNavedClasses]

So nice of you

[@kanchanbagri9971]

sir apki explaination bhot achi hai ..... very very good work sir ... it helped me a lot ...

[@PoojaSahu-vw4jw]

Thank you sir for providing this video , mujhe bahut hi jaroorat thi is video ki............ Onc again sir thanks for बेहतरीन explaination ................ 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks a lot 😊

[@rishitabhaduri7878]

This answer is for Lokesh...the basic difference between a cournot model and a stakelberg model is that in counot model all the firms take their pricing and output decisions simultaneously. However in stakelberg model the prudent or the sophisticated duopolist is capable enough to determine the reaction curve of its rival firms and by the virtue of which he can max his profits.(first movers advantage)

[@debendraho5796]

Thank u sir for well explanation stay healthy and happiness ..

[@miliris6276]

U are the best sir 🙏

[@hafizaiman6138]

Thank u sir...may you live long

[@TayyabaRafique-q7t]

Osm teaching method, God bless u❤❤❤❤

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks a lot

[@kainatjavaid130]

Thanks alot Sir for all your efforts for us
I secured my 1st position in 1st & 2nd smester in Masters by the help of your stunning way of explaining every topic
BZU Multan

[@DrNavedClasses]

Many congratulations Kainat

[@mdalquamahussain7408]

@kainatjavaid130 From which institute are you pursuing your M.A. ?

[@DishaGupta-yd5eu]

Thank you so much sir for this wonderful explanation

[@DrNavedClasses]

You are most welcome

[@iqrabibi9022]

Thank you so much stay bless 😊

[@RahulSharma-xr5kt]

very well explained sir worth watching

[@aditidwivedi2419]

Sir please aap ase hi videos bnate rahe they help us alot sir you are great in all ways ❤️

[@poonamyadav-kg4ky]

Thanku sir. Isi trah puri economics pdha dijiye..

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks Ms. Poonam. You can find some of the videos by clicking on the below link:
th-cam.com/channels/NZMrFuHVmpoW7zcITrN87Q.htmlvideos

[@MrPux1]

Thank you so much for your valuable videos It helped me a lot. God bless you sir.

[@easylearning4132]

Very nice teaching and explanation

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks

[@debasishrajbehera]

Thank you Sir.Nice explanation Sir.😊🙏🏽.

[@hrishikeshneog]

very good analysis

[@kavyajha3519]

Sir you are awesome💫

[@sidrabintibashir8616]

Thanks too much .....nice teaching love it.... stay blessed

[@nidhimishra7355]

Thankyou so much sir u r the best 😊😊😊😊😊🙏🙏🙏🙏huge respect ❤️

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks a lot 😊

[@pawanmeena9635]

Hello. at 16:08, P = 100-Q however it has been taken in the equation as 100-Q1. How?

[@hiteshdahiya9509]

I have doubt regarding same....pls help

[@prachetachattopadhyay74]

@@hiteshdahiya9509 same doubt

[@gaganshekhar]

Because, Firm 1 is price leader, and it is initially deciding its output without the presence of firm 2, so it will behave like monopolist, and there would be no difference between firm output and market output, so we can write that Q=Q¹

[@economicsartha]

Hello,Pawan Meena! You are absolutely right.Q= (Q1+Q2) and while determining Q1, reaction of follower firm must be included in demand function according to Stackelberg model.For clarification you may watch my channel on TH-cam- Economics Artha. Videos are, namely, Stackelberg model of Oligopoly and Stackelberg's Equilibrium

[@LivingEconomics]

Yes this is wrong explanation. He should have taken the reaction of firm 2 while deciding the output and therefore revenue.

[@mohammadzaid4100]

Sir isme firm 1
Firm 2 ka bhi production set karta hai kya

[@mdshamshad1351]

Well explained sir
Thank you 😊

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks Shamshad
th-cam.com/channels/NZMrFuHVmpoW7zcITrN87Q.htmlvideos

[@mdshamshad1351]

@@DrNavedClasses sir make a video on Hick's Revision Theory of Demand. Thanks a lot sir

[@rubynaved87]

Bohot achche sir, mazahi agya😊😊😊

[@DrNavedClasses]

thank you dear

[@shafiqhussain5706]

a very good way of explaining things

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks

[@RTknowledge-g1l]

Thanku sir 😊🙏

[@varshagupta7256]

Your videos are very helpful for my net preparation thanks a lot sir 🙏 😊
Sir ish theory me hume ek point samjh me nhi aya jo apne demand function P = 100 -Q liya kis base pr liya gya hai

[@E4ECO]

Great❤️

[@d.u.farooque786]

Helpful sir

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks

[@brindabantripathy1371]

Sir is stackelberg duopoly model and quantity leadership model are same

[@ashirkhan1208]

Very good sir, please upload all the topics of first semester of master level because only you can understand them. Am from islamia university of bahawalpur

[@DrNavedClasses]

Surely i will. Thanks 😊

[@Businesssouled]

Thank you so much sir 🤗🤗

[@DrNavedClasses]

most welcome

[@raginipal5827]

Sir u r too good.

[@AV98520]

Sir econometrics bhi padha de plz.

[@DrNavedClasses]

Will try Ajita

[@priyankakanojiya5208]

Nice video sir good explanation 👌👌👌

[@MdMusabalamECB]

Sir, is the market of cold drink is an example of monopolistic competition please sir give your argument

[@DrNavedClasses]

it is a type of oligopoly

[@kamalprabhakar6055]

thanks by heart sir ji.

[@makarandkamble5244]

Thanks Sir 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼💐💐💐💐💐

[@ksskss2409]

Nice explanation sir
Please give further simplification of derivative

[@DrNavedClasses]

Sure. Will soon

[@deepapal8904]

Thank you sir 💓💓💓💓💓

[@narabbas8733]

Sir model ka sth likh dia krn kb present hua r kis ne kia

[@jkd.1401]

Sir criticisms bhi sath me hi explain kijye Plz

[@DrNavedClasses]

OK, will take care of this, thanks

[@shauryakashyap6637]

Sir aap please growth model pe v apna video share kre... Specially technical change , embodied nd disembodied technical change pe.

[@DrNavedClasses]

ok

[@lokesh7736]

Cournot vaale model m b to sir pahle ek firm n supply ki thi phir doosri firm aayi thi,,, difference kya hua

[@economicsartha]

You are right.You can get your answer on my channel "Economics Artha" on TH-cam.There you can see all my videos on oligopoly (atleast 10 in numbers).In this case you tuber did not included reaction of the follower firm while determining the value of Q1. At the same time, applied marginal cost function of Cournot's(MC=0).So, the result is as of Cournot's.

[@EconomicswithEcoGirl]

Thank you sir🙏🙏🙏

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks

[@KRISHNAYADAV-qu5ms]

Nice episode 👌 👌

[@sillygirlaarya7119]

👍👍 gud explanation keep it up

[@farazabbasi8224]

Love you Sir G.

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thank you soooo much dear Faraz

[@sibanarayanmishra2345]

It's clear now..

[@DrNavedClasses]

😊

[@learningineconomics]

Sir notes kese milega

[@priyankatheartist8643]

awesome sir

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks a lot 😊

[@prachetachattopadhyay74]

why are we not considering q2 while calculating revenue for firm 1?

[@economicsartha]

Without including q2 ,the explanation and conclusion has no meaning.You may find it on my channel on TH-cam namely ''Economics Artha'' where two videos are available on this model- Stackelberg model of oligopoly and Stackelberg's Equilibrium.

[@pankajbisht2587]

As Q1 assuming Firm 1 leader is independent on output of Firm 2. Firm 2 will react once Firm 1 Q1 is established. So Firm1 will be Proactive as being leader and Firm 2 will be Reactive

[@ankursodani7645]

Sir is there is a universal law that output of firm 1 is twice of firm 2 in this model

[@DrNavedClasses]

No there is no universal law of suchs type.

[@ankursodani7645]

Sir one more request to you if possible please make one play list specially dedicated for MA Economics so that I saves our time to find suitable lectures because yours lecture and lecture of Ez Classes help me and my friends a lot

[@economicsartha]

Here you tuber was teaching Stackelberg's model but he solved the problem according to Cournot's model .So, the result is as of Cournot's.He did not included the reaction of the follower firm while determining the value of Q1 which was required in the case of Stackelberg's equilibrium.You can see my channel " Economics Artha" for clarity where about 10 videos are available on oligopoly.

[@srishtywashimkar5780]

Thank you so much very easily explained🙏｡◕‿◕｡

[@ownthinking2868]

Thank you so much sir

[@rohiniharidas]

Sir, Can you help in solving some problems?. Will pay for the same.

[@DrNavedClasses]

I can try dear without any payment. send your problems at [e-mail]

[@narabbas8733]

Mcqs k hawly sw important point dia krn

[@jung_cook]

sir you didn't reply my massage that do you give online classes if yes please i would like to join

[@DrNavedClasses]

Dear Praveen I have not been engaging any online class. I am sorry brother.

[@geetagurung7832]

Sir, profit maximize karna bi bhataena

[@DrNavedClasses]

Ok will upload soon geeta

[@kratikasoni6497]

per edgeworth model to stable equilibrium define hi nahin karta.....? then how both form can move for making collusive. 🙄

[@sshubamsanmotra]

if both firm want to be follower then what happend

[@prashantgaurav2842]

Never

[@muhammmadsharif6876]

Sir ye kaisa aa gia..p=100-(50+Q)
Simpifly kaisa hova =50-Q kaisa aa gia

[@DineshSharma-ox2vx]

P=100-(50+Q)
= 100 - 50 - Q
= 50 - Q
Its simple mathematical calculation....!

[@ownthinking2868]

ماشاءاللہ

[@DrNavedClasses]

بہت بہت شکریہ

[@Shivam-st4kq]

Ty sir

[@ravianand151]

Sir MC =0 lene ke pichhe koi logic??

[@DrNavedClasses]

Just for the sake of simplicity

[@purushottamshriivastav6957]

Ye assume Kiya h hmne simplicity ke liye

[@shivindersinghjamwal1586]

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

[@neelamdhiman4509]

,👍🙏

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks

[@LivingEconomics]

Sir I guess your explanation is incorrect

[@DrNavedClasses]

Thanks for the comment. I request u to plz elaborate the issue.

[@LivingEconomics]

@@DrNavedClasses about the quantity in mathematical expression. You didn’t take reaction function of follower firm to set the quantity of a leader firm. That’s what how its shown in books.

[@Kaur-mx2ox]

Thank you Sir 😊

[@chamanlaldewangan6591]

Thanks sir

[@economics_hub.]

Thank you so much sir 😊

[@kamalprabhakar6055]

infinite thanks sir ji.

[@DrNavedClasses]

Lots of thanks Kamal
th-cam.com/channels/NZMrFuHVmpoW7zcITrN87Q.htmlvideos

[@seemathapa8068]

Thank you sir

[@DrNavedClasses]

Most welcome

[@priyankasharma-hm8sd]

Thank you so much sir

[@comedycollection751]

thank you so much sir ,

[@upscdreams4149]

Thank you sir

[@urmilasharma564]

Thanku so much

[@rinkisahu2806]

Thank you so much sir

[@alexprince3406]

Thank you sir🙏