@@psychobeam99 Yes, but this is not War Thunder, and even there the Tiger II has an edge thanks to the better armor profile (less weakspots), much much better reload, gun depression, 5 crew, etc. In Enlisted it's much better to have a short reload to get rid of as much infantry as possible, the IS-2 can kill way more with a single shell, but you also have 3 times the reload, less ammo and Pz. IVs can one shot you if they know where to aim. Also switching ammo when you see a tank means that you need a lot more time to get ready and waste one of your already very limited shells. Personally I'd take the M26 in Enlisted over the IS-2, worse vs Tigers but much better against infantry, unless you happen to play on a map where everyone is sitting around the same place.
@leviathantsp Oh I know. I play Enlisted more than War Thunder. Good points all around but still, IS2 and King Tigers are about even. Soviets 122 having to be elevated to reload is why the reload takes all damn day realistically. Germans didnt have that issue.
@@psychobeam99 I feel you are judging it mostly from a 1 vs 1 situation without much else around them, in which case, they are somewhat even and whoever fires first wins. When you have 20 dudes swarming your tank from different directions, that's when the Tiger II gets a big edge, but it's okay to have a different opinion. Apparently IS-3 assets have been found in the files recently, so...
They need to put better Anti-tank weapons for the US here are some they can put in the game. UK No. 82 grenade (gammon bomb) UK No. 73 AT (N73) Anti-tank grenade UK No. 68 AT Anti-tank grenade US M20 75mm Recoilless Rifle US M18 RR Crew-Served Recoilless Rifle/Anti-tank/Anti-Personnel Weapon
![Hell Let Loose [12]](/img/n.gif)
Ah yes, the BR 6 you are actually playing (premium paratroopers and IS 2)
You are saying it like if the IS-2 was better than a Tiger II
@@leviathantsp Id say they are even personally. Both can penetrate the other with ease straight through the turret cheeks.
@@psychobeam99 Yes, but this is not War Thunder, and even there the Tiger II has an edge thanks to the better armor profile (less weakspots), much much better reload, gun depression, 5 crew, etc.
In Enlisted it's much better to have a short reload to get rid of as much infantry as possible, the IS-2 can kill way more with a single shell, but you also have 3 times the reload, less ammo and Pz. IVs can one shot you if they know where to aim. Also switching ammo when you see a tank means that you need a lot more time to get ready and waste one of your already very limited shells.
Personally I'd take the M26 in Enlisted over the IS-2, worse vs Tigers but much better against infantry, unless you happen to play on a map where everyone is sitting around the same place.
@leviathantsp Oh I know. I play Enlisted more than War Thunder. Good points all around but still, IS2 and King Tigers are about even. Soviets 122 having to be elevated to reload is why the reload takes all damn day realistically. Germans didnt have that issue.
@@psychobeam99 I feel you are judging it mostly from a 1 vs 1 situation without much else around them, in which case, they are somewhat even and whoever fires first wins. When you have 20 dudes swarming your tank from different directions, that's when the Tiger II gets a big edge, but it's okay to have a different opinion. Apparently IS-3 assets have been found in the files recently, so...
They need to put better Anti-tank weapons for the US here are some they can put in the game.
UK
No. 82 grenade (gammon bomb)
UK
No. 73 AT (N73) Anti-tank grenade
UK
No. 68 AT Anti-tank grenade
US
M20 75mm Recoilless Rifle
US
M18 RR Crew-Served Recoilless Rifle/Anti-tank/Anti-Personnel Weapon
At 14:49
new to br5 here, is it any fun?
The blood feature is new???
Nein