Feynman diagrams AS Physics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @rohanverma6058
    @rohanverma6058 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    After 6 years you are still very helpful, Thanks.

  • @blanchet2852
    @blanchet2852 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This is so good!! So straight forward!

  • @littlemissmakeup01
    @littlemissmakeup01 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have this exam today! Thank you sooooo much!

  • @M7RAA
    @M7RAA 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you, 8 years later still useful

  • @hollow9846
    @hollow9846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    an 8 year old video is better than most of the modern videos here which skip so much content 😭

  • @crytp0crux
    @crytp0crux 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much. Learned this very quickly with your help.

  • @azmathchoudhury8702
    @azmathchoudhury8702 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    honestly man keep doing what ur doing! too good

    • @jacksheldrake7712
      @jacksheldrake7712  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you I am in the process of making some new ones.

  • @ronaldprabodha916
    @ronaldprabodha916 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your explanation is awesome

  • @Benedictninja
    @Benedictninja 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    love your videos, thank you so much

  • @nikkiminho1003
    @nikkiminho1003 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much got exam this morning. This helped a lot. Please do unit 2 as well the exam is in two Weeks and I know nothing in unit 2.

  • @ryotokise6745
    @ryotokise6745 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hey iam wondering will you upload new videos for the new specifciation ?

    • @SuperMarley0
      @SuperMarley0 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Ryoto Kise (its almost identical)

  • @agoogleuser2757
    @agoogleuser2757 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why proton-proton interaction doesn't give neutron-neutron under strong nuclear force?
    And why is this not a weak interaction?

    • @1qualitybacon
      @1qualitybacon ปีที่แล้ว

      because when you get two particles that have equal charges they repel each other. Electromagnetic repulsion

  • @PepperAndKeith
    @PepperAndKeith 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This helped alot!

  • @amiriqbaldar6419
    @amiriqbaldar6419 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    in the pair of electron and its antiparticle, they annihalate each other becoz they have same mass and opposite and EQUAL charge,, then why don't elctron donot annihalate proton's mass equal in amount to its own mass as they also have EQUAL and opposite charge

  • @cyndawu1940
    @cyndawu1940 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo thank you very much, this is so helpful. :)

  • @azizhunzai2755
    @azizhunzai2755 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome sir......wana b your student.......

  • @DineshKumar-zw7vg
    @DineshKumar-zw7vg 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How's the positron moving forward in time ?

    • @jacksheldrake7712
      @jacksheldrake7712  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It can't go back in time.

    • @DineshKumar-zw7vg
      @DineshKumar-zw7vg 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacksheldrake7712 but positron is an anti particle and anti particles move backwards in time.

    • @jacksheldrake7712
      @jacksheldrake7712  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DineshKumar-zw7vg Please don't think of antiparticles going backwards in time. They are not going back in time, no A level Feynman diagram will suggest this. Focus on the conservation laws and understanding strong weak nuclear and what decays into what based on their mass / rest energy.

  • @nikkiminho1003
    @nikkiminho1003 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    New subscriber! :)

  • @B4TMAN97
    @B4TMAN97 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, I have this exam tommorow

    • @rubych4096
      @rubych4096 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      me too, how are you feeling about it?

    • @Membusy
      @Membusy 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ruby Ch
      Same and mildly shitting myself

    • @rubych4096
      @rubych4096 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      same here but aqa has been pretty good so far..

    • @Membusy
      @Membusy 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ye'. Good luck!

    • @rubych4096
      @rubych4096 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you too! I'm going t have to pull an all-nighter for this

  • @harshgurung4136
    @harshgurung4136 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Antiparticles have arrow in the opposite direction.

  • @_zay__326
    @_zay__326 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still can't understand how to balance 💔

  • @sampark3998
    @sampark3998 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hate the word electrostatic, the actual word is a contradiction of electrical movement, it can't be electrostatic ,hence if there is no potential the there is no flow( movement) electricity as a phenom isn't static,for anything to change state there must be potential, and when collision is made through potential the energy amassed will decay as energy can't be transferred at the same rate as it was before the collision, a new rate of energy is exposed.
    Great videos though one must ask the question on particle matter as thus , these machines that gather info on particles etc... what's the datum, is it just pure mathematical equations? if it was that easy then we would be living in a world of peacefullness, we are the game and they are playing.we can't see them particles but yet we can make machines that analysis them?

    • @CoconutJones_
      @CoconutJones_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Electrostatic means electrically charged but static. You can rub a balloon on your head and it will store charge that isn't flowing any where; the electric charge is static. Hence the term 'electrostatic'.