All things considered (placement, acoustics, yt compression, mic used, my headphones and headphone amp), I prefer the Dalis. As expected, the R-51s are bright for my taste. Vocals are more forward and sibilant, snare drum more forward and also dry etc
Thank you for your review, yes it is. However, let's say that this klipsch (r51) is the cheapest series than Dali's Oberon. I think with Klipsch's RP series...the rp400m -500m..would be a fairer comparison
@@Chris-rk5dd Fairer for sure, but I don't think we would have different results. I'd expect more refined results and better dynamics, but same character-voicing. The known Klipsh brightness, due to the horn-like twitters they use.
@@Yiannis2112horn has no role in brightness, its the sound signature thats the issue. There are way too many speakers that use horn which are super neutral
Dali better for jazz? Klipsch better for hard rock?
All things considered (placement, acoustics, yt compression, mic used, my headphones and headphone amp), I prefer the Dalis. As expected, the R-51s are bright for my taste. Vocals are more forward and sibilant, snare drum more forward and also dry etc
Thank you for your review, yes it is. However, let's say that this klipsch (r51) is the cheapest series than Dali's Oberon. I think with Klipsch's RP series...the rp400m -500m..would be a fairer comparison
@@Chris-rk5dd Fairer for sure, but I don't think we would have different results. I'd expect more refined results and better dynamics, but same character-voicing. The known Klipsh brightness, due to the horn-like twitters they use.
@@Yiannis2112horn has no role in brightness, its the sound signature thats the issue. There are way too many speakers that use horn which are super neutral
@@SahilFardeen8BallPool Noted! Cheers!
Chris Would you recommend the Klipsch R-51M for a turntable ?
Why not? It is important that the whole system is of close value and performance
1:33
in romania dali oberon it's has 2x price...
Same here ..