Honda S2000 2.0 Vtec ( 240 Hp ) vs Mazda RX8 Wankel 1.3 ( 241 Hp ) Acceleration Battle Pure Sound!!!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • Acceleration Battle!!!!!!
    Honda S2000 : 2.0 Vtec 240 Hp / 208 Nm
    Mazda RX8 : 1.3 Wankel 231 Hp / 211 Nm
    Subscribe to the channel for more videos!!

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @ThrottleTimeN1K
    @ThrottleTimeN1K ปีที่แล้ว +20

    "I'm gonna find two of the WORST acceleration videos for these two cars and compare them."

  • @grahamchapman20-03
    @grahamchapman20-03 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    There was a lot of wheel spin on the rx8, i would try some grippier tires and run the test again

  • @Ben.N
    @Ben.N ปีที่แล้ว +8

    That gauge cluster is so cool

  • @enkerl9172
    @enkerl9172 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    With the RX8 he simply couldn't get the gear from 3 to 4, you can see the delay in the video. Either way, both of them are on the same level, so it doesn't really apply. A second test wouldn't have been bad 🤔🤨

    • @TheXristosG3
      @TheXristosG3 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      here my rx8 type s get to 160km with just 3rd gear, this one in the video maybe is also weaker version of rx8

    • @АртурАгафонов-ш3ц
      @АртурАгафонов-ш3ц 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheXristosG3 5 speed gear

    • @TheXristosG3
      @TheXristosG3 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@АртурАгафонов-ш3ц yea, mine 6speed

    • @АртурАгафонов-ш3ц
      @АртурАгафонов-ш3ц 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheXristosG3 me too.

  • @Yakuuzy85
    @Yakuuzy85 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Omg what a terrible driver 😂 I have both cars, the S2K is a little bit faster above 100km/h but geeeeez, here it is just LOL 😂

  • @aluminumfalcon552
    @aluminumfalcon552 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interesting. I’m surprised how much quicker the S2000 is than the RX-8. As a comparison check out my Golf Alltrack video, it’s just a 0-75mph (0-120km/h) run. With the stage 1 tune it puts out about 220HP and 300 ft-lbs (406Nm).

    • @__dm__
      @__dm__ ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Probably mostly down to the weight differences, gearing looks about the same and the S2000 has a slight advantage due to VTEC VVT vs. well… no VVT.

    • @aluminumfalcon552
      @aluminumfalcon552 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@__dm__ I did a run with my speedo set to Km/h from 0-160. It did 0-100 in 5.7 seconds and 0-160 in 15.3 seconds. So it got to 100 quicker by 1.3 seconds and to 160 just .2 second slower, which makes perfect sense since the Golf has AWD and a massive low end torque curve, but the HP tops out quite low, where the S2000 has half the torque at is peak (a fraction of the torque overall) but it’s peak HP is higher and the car is a lot lighter. A good illustration of torque vs HP, and how two cars with similar HP numbers but very different HP and torque curves will accelerate different off the line vs at the top end.

  • @MrEk-rg8uq
    @MrEk-rg8uq 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    L driver

  • @domo5584
    @domo5584 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The 0-60 on S2000’s are under 6sec.

    • @tsapetro2618
      @tsapetro2618 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      in which planet? 😂

    • @moustachio334
      @moustachio334 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes if you dump the clutch at 6-7k rpm it can do under six and 0-100 in 14. There's so many tests showing these numbers. In the video, we see real world conditions. The magazines can afford to launch these cars hard.

    • @SantanKGhey1234
      @SantanKGhey1234 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tsapetro2618your moms planet

  • @on_wheels_80
    @on_wheels_80 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    S2000 stock 100-160 in 8 seconds is totally unrealistic. Should be more like 12.5 - same territory as the RX-8.

    • @CarlosGonzalez-vi9qv
      @CarlosGonzalez-vi9qv 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is this based on the video, or have you seen other RX8s get 12.5 100-160 kph?

  • @Carboniotecable
    @Carboniotecable 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    quello della rx8 non è bravo a guidare 😂😂

  • @thenet9537
    @thenet9537 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Terrible driver in both cars

    • @MrStealYourSoul69
      @MrStealYourSoul69 ปีที่แล้ว

      What did they do wrong?

    • @itsalexanderbotha1504
      @itsalexanderbotha1504 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MrStealYourSoul69 Second one had too much slip, first one didn’t have enough. Both could have launched much better. Also the rotary driver mis shifted.