While not the most realistic animation I have come across and the fact that the character animations were basically "Lego" people, you have captured the full horror and sadness of the tragedy, in a way others have not. I hope you can appreciate, that this is not intended to be a negative criticism of your work, but quite the contrary.
For those wondering why Boat 10 is lowered late in the animation at 2:09. This is because new evidence suggests it left later than previously thought. The testimonies of Frank Evans and Edward Buley indicate that the red port light was very close to the water when they left. Frank Evans said it was 10 feet from water when they left and Buley said it was under when they reached water. However, if it was lowered at 1:50, this would contradict Charles Lightoller, Hugh Woolner and Arthur Bright accounts as to where water was when Boat D lowered. (Lightoller said it was 10 feet from deck and Woolner implied it and Bright said the forecastle was going under when they left). We can’t change the waterline to account for Buley and Evans and dismiss other survivors. Edit: The officer In charge might have been Murdoch if he went aft after Boat C’s lowering to oversee Boat 10 before Boat A. Therefore, most likely, Boat 10 left later than previously thought, at 2:09 to account for Evans and Buley and not contradict other testimonies.
honestly in my opinion, even though the most part of the sinking was slow and calm, the last 5 minutes were terrifying, because in 5 minutes when water reached the boat deck, the whole ship just fell down dead, with the ship slipping down so rapidly and the splitting apart and the ending with stern almost vertical, it was really violent.
Very Well Done Kief! This Is Easily One, If Not The Best Animation Of The Sinking You Have Ever Made! I Am So Proud On How Much You Have Improved/Progressed! The Marconi Map Transition Scene Caught Me So Off-Guard, I Absolutely Love The Idea! My Legs Couldn't Stop Shaking Through The Whole Sinking, It Really Captured The Horror And Realism, It Felt Like I Was Actually There As A Flying Ghost, Watching Everything Take Place, It Scared Me. The Final Plunge Sequence Is Also A Great Improvement, Especially How Deep The #1Funnel Was Before Falling, And The Break-Up Sequence Was Also Great! It's Great To See On How The Forward Tower (Also Still Being Debated, Got Kicked Out Of Oceanic Odyssey Because Of It) Collapsed On The Surface, It Just Makes So Much More Sense For It To Just Collapse On The Surface, An It Also Adds Up With Accounts! I Noticed On How You Have Improved On Sound Design (No Need To Almost Kill Me For A Whole Week Anymore Lol). I Am Proud Of You! I Am Excited To See What You Will Be Able To Make In The Honor Of Those On Board And Titanic Herself In The Future!
That was amazing! I loved the animation and the sinking theory was great! I just need ask a couple questions what made you revert back to the forward tower collapsing? What caused the collapse of the forward tower? And how did it end up far north east?
I did not revert to the towers falling at the surface, it's a thing that I'm trying to add back in but is currently being further research, if proven, the bow's draft as it went down after detaching from the Stern could have caused an effect where it could have carried the tower along with its draft before it goes on its own sailing east.
@@user-sf1ww4vk2g The drag that it has as it descends, theres a force on the back that can actually pull debris along with its current, it works like a suction of sorts.
@@KiwiKiwf just going to point out, you can actually see the direction and magnitude of that force in overhead SONAR scans of the wrecksite-the darkened field stretching off to the northwest from the bow (where the No.1 cargo hatch cover landed after being blown off) shows where the sediment was packed down by the column collapse. The same effect is also observable with the large triangular debris field extending out due east from the stern section.
I like the minute by minute recap, my only thought is if the text could have stayed up longer and the marconi messages could be more readable as the blended into the background, otherwise very informative...nice work !
Emperor S.G., Its been 2 years since I asked the first time, can you please animate my Titanic sinking theory? I made a new one a few weeks ago and you can find it on my channel. Sorry its a slideshow, I can not animate, which is why I ask you to please bring it to life. Thank you and keep up your amazing work
Can't wait to see this and I'm honestly happy that you did titanic animations very well and one question I'm not sure was this a real time sinking animation
Frank Evans and Edward Buley testifyed the Port light being close to the water when they left. However, if it was lowered at 1;50, then water would have been at the railing at the side ofthe forecastle likely and the forecastle likely didnt submerge until Boat D's lowering as Arthur Bright in Boat D testified the forecastle was going under when they left. The only way to account for them is to have 10 lowered ;ater then prevoiusly thought. Others testified it was the last Boat from the port side lowered. They testified water was at the light when 10 left. Sorry for any offence, no offence meant
just a couple questions to get answered which is 1 when did each of the first beginning lifeboats get lowered and launched? 2 what caused the titanics lights to go out into sections? 3 And what time did Titanics forcastle/well deck start going under? 4 what did Robertha Watt meant about the \/\ sketch? And 5 what's the most reliable sources to learn about the titanic? Just want to know :]
1. What do you mean by this? I am confused. 2. The Titanic's Lights are divided into different sections and have their own circuit, the forward one likely failed by 2:05-2:10AM as evidenced by Passengers on Collapsible D who observed it. 3. 0200H was the time that the forecastle was mostly likely beginning to go under 4. The sketch was more likely an interpretation of the break-up occurring, and not how the break-up behaved. 5. Most reliable sources so far are by reading the survivor accounts, you can read them here: www.titanicinquiry.org/
@@KiwiKiwfthanks and sorry what I meant by 1 is when did all of titanics lifeboats before 2:00 am get launched and because the information on titanic Wiki is kinda outdated
@@user-sf1ww4vk2g Boat 7 12:40 AM Boat 5 12:45 AM Boat 3 12:55 AM Boat 8 1:00 AM Boat 1 1:05 AM Boat 6 1:10 AM Boat 16 1:20 AM Boat 14 1:25 AM Boat 12 & 9 1:30 AM Boat 11 1:35 AM Boat 13 1:40 AM Boat 15 1:41 AM Boat 2 1:45-1:50 AM Boat 4 1:50-1:55 AM
@@user-sf1ww4vk2gThe lights going out in sections would also account for those who thought the ship broke at a low angle as they would the lights in the bow going out as the bow disappearing.
I don't think the forward lights went out during the sinking. (Until they were submerged of course). There are other inaccuracies but the animation is fantastic!
As per current research the forward lights did go out that early. As per survivors on the Collapsible D, they saw the lights go off the moment it was sailing/rowing away. The lights were also separated in different sections (3 to be exact and other main different circuits/sections)
@user-lc8ne6hp2q Please could you explain about the other inaccuracies and about the forward lights not going out? I can't see any other inaccuracies and personally agree with the forward set going out.
The lights themselves wouldn't have been going out due to power failure, but because the ship's engineers were trying to retain as much power as possible. So shutting down power to flooded areas made sense. For a time, there were survivor reports about lights blazing underwater - this is because parts of the exterior can flood lower than the water line and those same spots inside the ship may not have been fully flooded yet. Once the water in the ship reached the fixtures however, they'd have shorted out the lights, had the engineers not pulled power from those areas of the ship first.
@@KiwiKiwf I half agree with you. when collapsible d was being lowered the forward a deck promenade was partially underwater, remember there was a port list. So probably the lights in the section that was partially submerged might have gone out. But there was no reason for all the lights in all of that promenade to go out since the starboard part wasn't underwater. Also, I'm curious in learning more about this theory. Could I have the names of the survivors who stated that the lights went out in that area? Also, you have to be sure to be careful of what year they say this, because memory is fallible, and they might have just remembered something wrong since many years had passed.
It's done for the fact that it will support the stern sinking beyond 2:20AM, as it if it broke quiet earlier it would have went down a bit earlier. Also for the fact that as to addition to new research, Boat 10 still got to a certain distance away from the ship before it broke, and same goes with Boat 2
@danieldoesstuff18 2:20 is an approximation. Watches show between 2:20 and 2:30. Survivors also testified Titanic remaining afloat for a while before sinking. (We know it broke at 2:17 as that was the time Californian saw (What was presumably) Titanic's lights go out) Some said it remained afloat for full five minutes. It might not be conventional, having Titanic sink after 2.20, but it does account for survivors who testified sinking shortly after 2.20. And also explian why some said it was horizontal for a bit and other saying it was vertical for a bit.
@@IloveCruiseShips1912 nah titanic sank at 2:20am any later is too late and inaccurate and also the different times could be due to the watch and how water resistant it was
@@danieldoesstuff18 Testimonies are contradicting with each other, some state it stops at 2:23 others at 2:30, The best estimates as of current research is 2:21-2:25. Any time prior to that may be considered somewhat innaccurate.
2:20 is an approximation. Watches show between 2:20 and 2:30. Survivors also testified Titanic remaining afloat for a while before sinking. (We know it broke at 2:17 as that was the time Californian saw (What was presumably) Titanic's lights go out) Some said it remained afloat for full five minutes. It might not be conventional, having Titanic sink after 2.20, but it does account for survivors who testified sinking shortly after 2.20. And also explian why some said it was horizontal for a bit and other saying it was vertical for a bit. Sorry for any offence, no offence meant
That map transition at 3:31 was OUTSTANDING!
While not the most realistic animation I have come across and the fact that the character animations were basically "Lego" people, you have captured the full horror and sadness of the tragedy, in a way others have not. I hope you can appreciate, that this is not intended to be a negative criticism of your work, but quite the contrary.
18:34 That is the sound of a woman crying out terrified.
For those wondering why Boat 10 is lowered late in the animation at 2:09. This is because new evidence suggests it left later than previously thought. The testimonies of Frank Evans and Edward Buley indicate that the red port light was very close to the water when they left. Frank Evans said it was 10 feet from water when they left and Buley said it was under when they reached water. However, if it was lowered at 1:50, this would contradict Charles Lightoller, Hugh Woolner and Arthur Bright accounts as to where water was when Boat D lowered. (Lightoller said it was 10 feet from deck and Woolner implied it and Bright said the forecastle was going under when they left). We can’t change the waterline to account for Buley and Evans and dismiss other survivors.
Edit: The officer In charge might have been Murdoch if he went aft after Boat C’s lowering to oversee Boat 10 before Boat A.
Therefore, most likely, Boat 10 left later than previously thought, at 2:09 to account for Evans and Buley and not contradict other testimonies.
But who was the officer in charge of lowering Boat 10 if it was lowered that late?
@@EpicJoshua314 I have just edited my comment to say who lowered Boat 10. Thanks for pointing out.
honestly in my opinion, even though the most part of the sinking was slow and calm, the last 5 minutes were terrifying, because in 5 minutes when water reached the boat deck, the whole ship just fell down dead, with the ship slipping down so rapidly and the splitting apart and the ending with stern almost vertical, it was really violent.
Incredible animation, keep up the great work :). Very accurate aswell :)
3:33 Nice video! However in this point I think there is missing ship. The SS Parisien was also close to Titanic, if I recall correctly.
Excellent
Waiting
Very Well Done Kief! This Is Easily One, If Not The Best Animation Of The Sinking You Have Ever Made! I Am So Proud On How Much You Have Improved/Progressed! The Marconi Map Transition Scene Caught Me So Off-Guard, I Absolutely Love The Idea! My Legs Couldn't Stop Shaking Through The Whole Sinking, It Really Captured The Horror And Realism, It Felt Like I Was Actually There As A Flying Ghost, Watching Everything Take Place, It Scared Me. The Final Plunge Sequence Is Also A Great Improvement, Especially How Deep The #1Funnel Was Before Falling, And The Break-Up Sequence Was Also Great! It's Great To See On How The Forward Tower (Also Still Being Debated, Got Kicked Out Of Oceanic Odyssey Because Of It) Collapsed On The Surface, It Just Makes So Much More Sense For It To Just Collapse On The Surface, An It Also Adds Up With Accounts! I Noticed On How You Have Improved On Sound Design (No Need To Almost Kill Me For A Whole Week Anymore Lol). I Am Proud Of You! I Am Excited To See What You Will Be Able To Make In The Honor Of Those On Board And Titanic Herself In The Future!
yeahhhhhhhhh W
That was amazing! I loved the animation and the sinking theory was great! I just need ask a couple questions what made you revert back to the forward tower collapsing? What caused the collapse of the forward tower? And how did it end up far north east?
I did not revert to the towers falling at the surface, it's a thing that I'm trying to add back in but is currently being further research, if proven, the bow's draft as it went down after detaching from the Stern could have caused an effect where it could have carried the tower along with its draft before it goes on its own sailing east.
@@KiwiKiwfinteresting how could the bow theoretically cause the tower section to get dragged far north?
@@user-sf1ww4vk2g The drag that it has as it descends, theres a force on the back that can actually pull debris along with its current, it works like a suction of sorts.
@@KiwiKiwfInteresting! keep up the good work :)
@@KiwiKiwf just going to point out, you can actually see the direction and magnitude of that force in overhead SONAR scans of the wrecksite-the darkened field stretching off to the northwest from the bow (where the No.1 cargo hatch cover landed after being blown off) shows where the sediment was packed down by the column collapse.
The same effect is also observable with the large triangular debris field extending out due east from the stern section.
I like the minute by minute recap, my only thought is if the text could have stayed up longer and the marconi messages could be more readable as the blended into the background, otherwise very informative...nice work !
Emperor S.G., Its been 2 years since I asked the first time, can you please animate my Titanic sinking theory? I made a new one a few weeks ago and you can find it on my channel. Sorry its a slideshow, I can not animate, which is why I ask you to please bring it to life. Thank you and keep up your amazing work
Can't wait to see this and I'm honestly happy that you did titanic animations very well and one question I'm not sure was this a real time sinking animation
Pretty good animation...
Boat 10 being the last lifeboat launched is weird, though...
Frank Evans and Edward Buley testifyed the Port light being close to the water when they left. However, if it was lowered at 1;50, then water would have been at the railing at the side ofthe forecastle likely and the forecastle likely didnt submerge until Boat D's lowering as Arthur Bright in Boat D testified the forecastle was going under when they left. The only way to account for them is to have 10 lowered ;ater then prevoiusly thought. Others testified it was the last Boat from the port side lowered. They testified water was at the light when 10 left. Sorry for any offence, no offence meant
Epic Video Brother
underated
just a couple questions to get answered which is 1 when did each of the first beginning lifeboats get lowered and launched? 2 what caused the titanics lights to go out into sections? 3 And what time did Titanics forcastle/well deck start going under? 4 what did Robertha Watt meant about the \/\ sketch? And 5 what's the most reliable sources to learn about the titanic? Just want to know :]
1. What do you mean by this? I am confused.
2. The Titanic's Lights are divided into different sections and have their own circuit, the forward one likely failed by 2:05-2:10AM as evidenced by Passengers on Collapsible D who observed it.
3. 0200H was the time that the forecastle was mostly likely beginning to go under
4. The sketch was more likely an interpretation of the break-up occurring, and not how the break-up behaved.
5. Most reliable sources so far are by reading the survivor accounts, you can read them here: www.titanicinquiry.org/
@@KiwiKiwfthanks and sorry what I meant by 1 is when did all of titanics lifeboats before 2:00 am get launched and because the information on titanic Wiki is kinda outdated
@@user-sf1ww4vk2g
Boat 7 12:40 AM
Boat 5 12:45 AM
Boat 3 12:55 AM
Boat 8 1:00 AM
Boat 1 1:05 AM
Boat 6 1:10 AM
Boat 16 1:20 AM
Boat 14 1:25 AM
Boat 12 & 9 1:30 AM
Boat 11 1:35 AM
Boat 13 1:40 AM
Boat 15 1:41 AM
Boat 2 1:45-1:50 AM
Boat 4 1:50-1:55 AM
@@KiwiKiwfthanks for the help but what did you mean about the Watt sketch being the interpretation of the break up occuring?
@@user-sf1ww4vk2gThe lights going out in sections would also account for those who thought the ship broke at a low angle as they would the lights in the bow going out as the bow disappearing.
I hope I’m not late
I don't think the forward lights went out during the sinking. (Until they were submerged of course). There are other inaccuracies but the animation is fantastic!
As per current research the forward lights did go out that early. As per survivors on the Collapsible D, they saw the lights go off the moment it was sailing/rowing away. The lights were also separated in different sections (3 to be exact and other main different circuits/sections)
@user-lc8ne6hp2q Please could you explain about the other inaccuracies and about the forward lights not going out? I can't see any other inaccuracies and personally agree with the forward set going out.
The lights themselves wouldn't have been going out due to power failure, but because the ship's engineers were trying to retain as much power as possible. So shutting down power to flooded areas made sense.
For a time, there were survivor reports about lights blazing underwater - this is because parts of the exterior can flood lower than the water line and those same spots inside the ship may not have been fully flooded yet.
Once the water in the ship reached the fixtures however, they'd have shorted out the lights, had the engineers not pulled power from those areas of the ship first.
@@KiwiKiwf I half agree with you. when collapsible d was being lowered the forward a deck promenade was partially underwater, remember there was a port list. So probably the lights in the section that was partially submerged might have gone out. But there was no reason for all the lights in all of that promenade to go out since the starboard part wasn't underwater. Also, I'm curious in learning more about this theory. Could I have the names of the survivors who stated that the lights went out in that area? Also, you have to be sure to be careful of what year they say this, because memory is fallible, and they might have just remembered something wrong since many years had passed.
@@pc_buildyb0i935 Most likely, it was due to water short-circuiting the circuits.
May I ask what the intro song is that is being played? From 0:00 to like 1:00
Barcarolle - from the Titanic Songbook
I'm waiting! When will you do my breakup theory? I would love for you to do it!
Your theory needs to be atleast accurate, chances are, I don’t really know.
You’ll need to prove your research as plausible as well.
Oh amigo cochu444 quero todos os packs de navios do prisma 3d seus
おはようございます❗
Hello!
Fourth
I noticed that the time you have titanic sink is 2 minutes off just wanted to point that out
It's done for the fact that it will support the stern sinking beyond 2:20AM, as it if it broke quiet earlier it would have went down a bit earlier. Also for the fact that as to addition to new research, Boat 10 still got to a certain distance away from the ship before it broke, and same goes with Boat 2
@danieldoesstuff18 2:20 is an approximation. Watches show between 2:20 and 2:30. Survivors also testified Titanic remaining afloat for a while before sinking. (We know it broke at 2:17 as that was the time Californian saw (What was presumably) Titanic's lights go out) Some said it remained afloat for full five minutes. It might not be conventional, having Titanic sink after 2.20, but it does account for survivors who testified sinking shortly after 2.20. And also explian why some said it was horizontal for a bit and other saying it was vertical for a bit.
@@IloveCruiseShips1912 nah titanic sank at 2:20am any later is too late and inaccurate and also the different times could be due to the watch and how water resistant it was
@@danieldoesstuff18 Testimonies are contradicting with each other, some state it stops at 2:23 others at 2:30, The best estimates as of current research is 2:21-2:25. Any time prior to that may be considered somewhat innaccurate.
Any time after 2:20am actually is considered somewhat inaccurate the plus each watch are different some can be more resistant to water than others
23:01 it was 2.20
2:20 is an approximation. Watches show between 2:20 and 2:30. Survivors also testified Titanic remaining afloat for a while before sinking. (We know it broke at 2:17 as that was the time Californian saw (What was presumably) Titanic's lights go out) Some said it remained afloat for full five minutes. It might not be conventional, having Titanic sink after 2.20, but it does account for survivors who testified sinking shortly after 2.20. And also explian why some said it was horizontal for a bit and other saying it was vertical for a bit.
Sorry for any offence, no offence meant