Why Study... The Orthodox Churches of the East with Dr Mary Cunningham

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
  • www.nottingham.ac.uk/theology
    There are many Christian Churches which have ancient roots, but about which western Christians are almost wholly unaware. Here Dr Mary Cunningham seeks to draw attention to the ancient Churches of Syria, Armenia, Georgia, Egypt and Ethiopia.

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @t.e.1189
    @t.e.1189 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just discovered these 'Why study . . .' videos with Mary Cunningham. I find them very easy to listen to. She's obviously well read & knowledgeable, but completely void of all the arrogance than many professors and scholars exhibit today. Thank you for posting these.

  • @neilhasid3407
    @neilhasid3407 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love Mary Cunningham!

  • @antonius3745
    @antonius3745 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is great group of scholars

  • @uniofnottingham
    @uniofnottingham  11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am glad that you are interested in the Orthodox Churches and I am sure that you would be welcomed if you want to visit one. I am not sure whether there are churches in Jamaica, but you could try looking online or in your local telephone directory. Good luck with this! - Dr Mary Cunningham

  • @princelazar5634
    @princelazar5634 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting that she picks mostly Oriental Orthodox Churches and one Eastern Orthodox.

  • @crazycheetha
    @crazycheetha 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice... i can add to ur knowledge... im assyrian.. speak and read a little..

  • @rocoreb
    @rocoreb 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    indeed, brother.

  • @alphansoblake
    @alphansoblake 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I how love to know more about there churches. I live Jamaica I worship@ a Baptist church ware can I get more information

  • @MrDrichards85
    @MrDrichards85 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Google "Is there really a Patristic critique of Icons?" It is in five parts and addresses the Patristic "proof-texts" and shows that there is no substantial Patristic critique of icons. Examples, the Epiphanius quote is a straight up forgery. Those who quote the Council of Elvira fail to note that it was a regional council which never gained any traction in the rest of the Church, it is frequently mistranslated by polemicists, and those who use the canon never follow the council's other canons.

  • @MarkCox73
    @MarkCox73 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    IC XC NI KA Glory to Jesus Christ forever!

  • @princelazar5634
    @princelazar5634 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good point. As I understand it, Orthodox is the only flavor of the Christian faith that is growing. Does anyone have any supporting (or contrary) data?

    • @user-uu5zv9qw1y
      @user-uu5zv9qw1y 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Prince Lazar No. Orthodox has been in decline for centuries. Only Catholicism is growing

  • @StefanEmil13
    @StefanEmil13 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    so...when are you two gonna become Orthodox? (if you aren't already ;D)

  • @neilhasid3407
    @neilhasid3407 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Palestine?! Why don't they say Israel?? Curious.

    • @KaiTakApproach
      @KaiTakApproach 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because Israel wasn't a nation until 1948 and even in Biblical times the tribes of Israel really only controlled a portion of that land widely known as Canaan? The concept that "Israel" is a contiguous, exclusive and continuous state of the Jews is a view limited to Zionism and is ahistorical.

    • @antonius3745
      @antonius3745 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@KaiTakApproach thats not correct. Don't make it political. It just that the Romans called it Palestine. The name has nothing to do with Palestine's in the current sense of the word. It was called according to the sea-people Philisti. The most inhabitants of the Roman province Palestina were in those days Jews and Christians. So keep out nowadays politics please.