Thanks for watching. You can transfer facebow to a virtual articulator. What you need is enough reference points to be able to match the position. Use index tray, horizontal and vertical planes. Let me know if you have any problems.
@@wixur Thank you very much for answering, I almost got it, so, if I understood it right... you scan maxillary and mandibular arch, then the bite, and finally the scan of the facebow index positioned with your registration material, I have doubt here, 1.This is done with physical maxillary model or it can be done directly in mouth?, 2.With this method the occlusal plane angle is transferred correctly with respect to the horizontal/zero degree plane?. Because in kois it would be the fox plane but if this attachment will not be used, how this information is being transferred? Regarding the vertical mounting distance between the upper base of the articulator and the maxillary model, is the assertion of a fixed distance of 100mm correct in the mid axis-incisal distance?
How is that good job? Because of his lack of knowledge and arbitrary settings he gave to that patient teeth with balancing interference on last molar...so Dr needs to remove from antagonist to remove his mistake and if that Dr is knowledgeable as he is that patient for sure curses both of them
Ok ..but from what I saw ..you positionated your models on a flat occlusal plane forward over your incisal pin ..you didn't followed the bonwel triangle nor campers angle nor Frankfort plane...you had in option condilar at 30 benet at 15 which is ok ..but you same had 0.5mm imediate side shift..which I doubt u got from your doctor and I doubt you have 0.5mm on your articulator...in your case u are better just going with centric occlusion u would make less mess then either those arbitrary settings.. You come to conclusions that you dont have enough space on your last molar when actually it was balancing interfeerance bcz you let your condilar angle at 30 which obviously wasnt enough for that patient...next time first check your case on real articulator then transfer those setting in your virtual articulator...in this case u gave to that patient teeth with balancing interferance on his last teeth..so either doctor gonna need to remove from antagonist or that patient will curse you and that dr
Hi there, First of all, thanks for watching and all the details you mentioned. This video was made as an work sample and was not going to be used in the treatment. The focus was on how virtual articulator enables dynamic occlusion as an introduction to those who do not use it in design. What you say about pin, angle and planes are true, but it is not the case here. I like to hear more from you. Keep in touch!
Perfect my man❤
Thanks for watching🙂👍
Can something be used to transfer the facebow potion from a Hanau to any exocad digital articulator?
Thanks for watching. You can transfer facebow to a virtual articulator. What you need is enough reference points to be able to match the position. Use index tray, horizontal and vertical planes. Let me know if you have any problems.
@@wixur Thank you very much for answering, I almost got it, so, if I understood it right... you scan maxillary and mandibular arch, then the bite, and finally the scan of the facebow index positioned with your registration material, I have doubt here, 1.This is done with physical maxillary model or it can be done directly in mouth?, 2.With this method the occlusal plane angle is transferred correctly with respect to the horizontal/zero degree plane?. Because in kois it would be the fox plane but if this attachment will not be used, how this information is being transferred?
Regarding the vertical mounting distance between the upper base of the articulator and the maxillary model, is the assertion of a fixed distance of 100mm correct in the mid axis-incisal distance?
@@wixur hi 👓
hi Sir! Is it possible to transfer position from SAM system to exocad articulator?Would be glad for any kind of answers, thank you!
Nice👍
Stay tuned ;)
Good job
Thanks for watching
How is that good job? Because of his lack of knowledge and arbitrary settings he gave to that patient teeth with balancing interference on last molar...so Dr needs to remove from antagonist to remove his mistake and if that Dr is knowledgeable as he is that patient for sure curses both of them
❤️❤️❤️❤️😘👍
Thanks for watching :)
cool
Stay tuned😉👍
👍👏👏👏
🤩👍
Ok ..but from what I saw ..you positionated your models on a flat occlusal plane forward over your incisal pin ..you didn't followed the bonwel triangle nor campers angle nor Frankfort plane...you had in option condilar at 30 benet at 15 which is ok ..but you same had 0.5mm imediate side shift..which I doubt u got from your doctor and I doubt you have 0.5mm on your articulator...in your case u are better just going with centric occlusion u would make less mess then either those arbitrary settings..
You come to conclusions that you dont have enough space on your last molar when actually it was balancing interfeerance bcz you let your condilar angle at 30 which obviously wasnt enough for that patient...next time first check your case on real articulator then transfer those setting in your virtual articulator...in this case u gave to that patient teeth with balancing interferance on his last teeth..so either doctor gonna need to remove from antagonist or that patient will curse you and that dr
Hi there,
First of all, thanks for watching and all the details you mentioned. This video was made as an work sample and was not going to be used in the treatment. The focus was on how virtual articulator enables dynamic occlusion as an introduction to those who do not use it in design. What you say about pin, angle and planes are true, but it is not the case here. I like to hear more from you. Keep in touch!