Being Secular is not normal- Sadhguru

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
  • Secular is not normal- Sadhguru

ความคิดเห็น • 98

  • @harshadshelar7948
    @harshadshelar7948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Wow the deepest explanation on secular

  • @krishnamsdhoni
    @krishnamsdhoni 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This is why its important for jnani's to direct the country, because they are not a part of social interest, individuality or attitudes. So as reality is always changing its situations and circumstances, someone who knows how existence works has to read the way of nature of existence using nyaya or reasoning and tell what is correct and incorrect in a dharmic way which includes and involves human qualities

  • @Rahul97115
    @Rahul97115 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    fully agree with sadhguru, india was is and always will be a hindu country.

    • @liliesandtulips2000
      @liliesandtulips2000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's time to announce this officially.

    • @user-hh5hs3zr5b
      @user-hh5hs3zr5b 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      You dont have any shame to insult the very values our country is built on ? Secularism is the cornerstone of our democracy

    • @viswanthvichu191
      @viswanthvichu191 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Religion is secondary. Humanity is first

    • @sandipadas9216
      @sandipadas9216 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@user-hh5hs3zr5b do you have shame to destroy the values of India? And India was not built on anything you said. So stfu with you pseudo knowledge and pseudo secularism of you don't know shit... It's you who should be ashamed.

    • @user-hh5hs3zr5b
      @user-hh5hs3zr5b 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@sandipadas9216 you dismissing indias constitution and our great leaders vision of secularism as pseudo knowledge and people who stand up for it as destroying values of India lol 😂🙏

  • @tesakun3133
    @tesakun3133 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Secular is good

  • @krishnamsdhoni
    @krishnamsdhoni 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The more people are given the oppurtunity to do what they prefer and like over being existantial, the less there will any risks due to security or even bonds, because now there is a liberty to your preference above how reality works so you'll just be breaking the life apart by putting emotions over the way life works while you'll also be breaking other things apart as well because individuality will be put above nature. Its like you have one way, I have another way but existence has its own way in which all of operate. If you are the only one existing here then you may be secular but you aren't nor are you seperate from the laws that govern things. So a secular society is a false society because it puts human preferences above everything and conducts it as social norm which is adharma. When things were not so secular, we were all stuck with each other. Naturally things like tolerance or care comes. Now if you put human interest above existantial way, then you'll have to deal with everything seperately, which will not lead to growth but suffering

  • @themushroom2130
    @themushroom2130 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    my mom told me that never believe a saint that talks politics
    never believe a politician who talks of religious activites
    never believe an NRI who is patriotic

    • @varshitakamal4301
      @varshitakamal4301 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well said sir

    • @sahilthapliyal
      @sahilthapliyal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Third one is not true there are many indians who studies abroad but came to india to help the country

    • @vivekanandrai5824
      @vivekanandrai5824 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ohhh so Kunal kamra is your mom?

    • @ARPIT-gm3lw
      @ARPIT-gm3lw ปีที่แล้ว

      Your mom is right 👌

  • @ya00007
    @ya00007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If India's way of life is better than other countries why do Indians migrate to more prosper countries such as UK, USA, Canada etc?

    • @akshaydushyanth9720
      @akshaydushyanth9720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      How many indians are migrating? Do u have enough stats to prove that many are migrating?

    • @ya00007
      @ya00007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@akshaydushyanth9720 My own father migranted from India to the UK for a better standard of living. UK = 1st world country, India = 3rd world country. How many people migrate from a rich country to a poor country than vice versa? Please stay in India and don't try to come to the UK. It's better for you and me.

    • @akshaydushyanth9720
      @akshaydushyanth9720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ya00007 did i say ill migrate to UK?. Meanwhile every one who migrated to foreign countries from india did it for their own benefit not to the country. There are ppl who are having better standard of living in india in a family of five with only one person earning whereas u cannot live on single person's income in UK isn't it? Why the hell so many returned to their hometowns from foreign countries to india during covid? Don't be biased

    • @ya00007
      @ya00007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@akshaydushyanth9720 All I'm saying is that "generally" the standard of living in 1st world countries is better than 3rd world countries. That's why people move to such countries.

    • @neelparekh6024
      @neelparekh6024 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@akshaydushyanth9720 asking for stats 🤣🤣🤣

  • @aaryan1143
    @aaryan1143 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Religion Has Only Caused People To Divide.
    Two People Can't Love Each Other Just Because They Are of Different Religion.
    Time To End This Concept of Religion & Adapt Atheism.

    • @Smpk12
      @Smpk12 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes

    • @indiandaredevil7497
      @indiandaredevil7497 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yup

    • @anuradhadeokar2692
      @anuradhadeokar2692 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A option reasonable to accept.

    • @neelparekh6024
      @neelparekh6024 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In 10th I also used to think this but later on I realised that removing religion will be something that will cause more hate, I guess 🙄🙄❤️❤️

    • @kmckask4831
      @kmckask4831 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You mean hedonism? Islam is far superior to atheistic ideologies especially from the US. I am aware that not all atheists accept the toxicity of the states, however they are sadly rare

  • @mitrakm5221
    @mitrakm5221 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm not very sure if the statement covered in the video holds truth.
    In my knowledge, the President of India also takes oath in the name of God. I have seen a few President's oath taking ceremony for the office.
    I don't see, how it's different from United States. It would be false to compare the two countries with this example of secularism.

  • @Alex.teimoori
    @Alex.teimoori 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks

  • @parameswaran8406
    @parameswaran8406 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Explanation of secularism is good but the oath is i the name of both God and constitutional rights. I do swear in the name of God.. This is confusing...

  • @krishnamsdhoni
    @krishnamsdhoni 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Human beings have similarities as well as differences, similarities is what creates common law. People who act too secular lost their minds because they are doing a big injustice towards existence by thinking they are or their life seperate from everything that works around them which karmically will bring awful result at some point, it hasn't yet because nobody cared to explain how wrong they are. But because their actions are related to everything around them, this idea of secularity also destroys the way of life around them because their preferences obviously play against nature. When we involve things like dharma, its not based on preferences. It is based on reality

    • @wardenai7650
      @wardenai7650 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what a bunch of nonsense, you just deemed your life higher than others which is precisely the thing Sadhguru is talking about, you have fixed your identity in your way of life and doomed others.

    • @sankalpyadav2926
      @sankalpyadav2926 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wardenai7650 then you could have questioned him brother as sadhguru said

  • @bobubob5025
    @bobubob5025 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Secular literally means non-religious
    IE
    not connected with religious or spiritual matters.

  • @rana-1098
    @rana-1098 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Be Like Water

  • @techihandle
    @techihandle 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Don't believe a saint talking politics & politician talking religion.

    • @swakal8868
      @swakal8868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      because you think saints can't become politicians and politicians can't become saints.
      who asked you to draw line between what person is or could do.

    • @sandipadas9216
      @sandipadas9216 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      What is your view on the Islamic political groups you shameless person

    • @techihandle
      @techihandle 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sandipadas9216 dear lady my views for all the religions are same, all of them are for minting money and keeping power and control over masses including Islam. I don't have any reason to fight like kids about their favourite imaginary characters.

    • @swakal8868
      @swakal8868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@techihandle religion is word alien to Bharat. What you are calling religion is basically rigid beleifs . First draw line between religion and spirituality. Or search video of Sadhguru which clears difference between both. Sadhguru himself is against religion. He says its greatest f1lth mankind has ever made.

    • @swakal8868
      @swakal8868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@techihandle if you think they are imaginary character, respect values which are shown by them.... You don't like religion and its beliefs but on other hand you believed many characters don't existed. HypoCrisy. In both level you are believing what you don't know. There is middle ground between believing and not believing... It called agnosticism.. when you become that you start seeking TRUTH AND THATS WHAT OUR CULTURE TEACHES US. SEARCH TRUTH...

  • @selvamony
    @selvamony 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    With all respect Satguru is trying to mislead people. First of all comparing everything for western democracy and way of life itself is wrong because you yourself claim that we are ancient than them. Another issue is to take from the example you have taken is out of the context by which it's simple to day that the point is misleading. What am I saying? The palace in UK is not secular. FYI the queen is head of the Anglican Church.
    I am not advocating secularism. But the most respected Satguru needs little more seeking of facts and context. Or else the people following the Satguru will be misled and the responsibility will be on the Satguru Himself. Thanks.

    • @aalindgupta9761
      @aalindgupta9761 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What are you trying to say buddy?

    • @sandipadas9216
      @sandipadas9216 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You guys are so shitty that you never want to listen... And since when is following your own religion against secularism? The queen is free to follow Christianity and be head of any church. How do people like you exist

    • @odesau2b
      @odesau2b 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Priyanka Gupta aur aap aandhe Bakht brigade..

    • @RD-rm1ew
      @RD-rm1ew 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have lived in UK for close to 6 years and I can vouch for Sadhguru example... UK is indeed a democracy( constitutional monarchy) ... UK has Queen as head of state and India has President as heat of state.
      Wikipedia info below ...
      The United Kingdom is a unitary state with devolution that is governed within the framework of a parliamentary democracy under a constitutional monarchy in which the monarch, currently Queen Elizabeth II, is the head of state while the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, currently Boris Johnson, is the head of government. Executive power is exercised by the British government, on behalf of and by the consent of the monarch,

    • @pronambiswas2175
      @pronambiswas2175 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok libtard

  • @AbdulRahman-lu6dn
    @AbdulRahman-lu6dn 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    ..