Challenging Darwinian Theory: Muslim Perspectives Evolution | Qaiser Ahmed Raja & Hafiz M Shariq

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024
  • In this thought-provoking podcast, polemicist Qaisar Ahmed Raja Sahib and Hafiz Muhammad Shariq critically examine Evolutionary Biology and Darwin's Theory. They explore why many Muslims deny evolution and discuss classical scholars' views on the subject. The conversation delves into topics like Natural Selection, Speciation, Genetic Drift, and Evolutionary Genetics. They also touch upon Adaptation, Phylogenetics, Human Evolution, and Molecular Evolution, and ponder whether there were beings before Adam and Eve. This podcast highlights the importance of understanding the evolution theory in today's context.
    #EvolutionaryBiology #DarwinsTheory #NaturalSelection #Speciation #GeneticDrift #EvolutionaryGenetics #Adaptation #Phylogenetics #HumanEvolution #MolecularEvolution #MuslimScholars #IslamicViews #EvolutionDebate #AdamAndEve #ClassicalScholars #ScientificDiscussion #EvolutionPodcast #QaisarAhmedRaja #HafizMuhammadShariq #EvolutionCritique #EvolutionMatters #ScienceAndReligion #DarwinDebate #EvolutionTheory #MolecularScience #HumanOrigins

ความคิดเห็น • 382

  • @buraqstudio0786
    @buraqstudio0786 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Qaiser Raja is still evolving.

  • @Mr.Adlag.
    @Mr.Adlag. หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Evolution worshippers arnt having fun in comment section 😂

  • @mohammadzakiahmad8389
    @mohammadzakiahmad8389 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Evolution ka koi evidence nahi hai....lekin Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence..

    • @MustafizulIslam-w2y
      @MustafizulIslam-w2y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Then why you don't believe in God ,we can give same argument for God too😂

    • @suhaylmir
      @suhaylmir 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      evolution has enough and strong evidence. Just care to study it. Stop listening to this idiot.

    • @DontOpenThisChannel
      @DontOpenThisChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Then it's believe, bolo eman ha mera.

    • @Sigma.boy.Lucky.786
      @Sigma.boy.Lucky.786 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MustafizulIslam-w2y yes so u also beleive in unicorn , laprocan, fairy tales, dragon, monkeyman, flying sphagati monester, and many more thing like this.😂😂😂😂😂😂. because allah and these all have no evidence to exist

    • @jog.antani
      @jog.antani 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sab evidence hai. Vaccines kaisw banti hai.. virus ka naya strain ata hai wo evolution hai

  • @Silence4peace
    @Silence4peace 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Qaiser Ahmed Raja Zindabad ❤

  • @HamzaKhan-yo5rh
    @HamzaKhan-yo5rh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Anchor ko patience k sath guest ka answer suna chahiye without cutting his answer

  • @faisalsalehvlogs3367
    @faisalsalehvlogs3367 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    MashaAllah ❤❤❤. QAR explains every complex matter in a very simple way.

    • @rationallearner
      @rationallearner 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also everything he exlpains is incorrect and force fitted to make sure that it is in agreement with islam. He has no knowledge of science.

    • @agnostic1111
      @agnostic1111 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He explains only for moron people not for normal mind 😅😅😅

  • @DaDdy-lw9bn
    @DaDdy-lw9bn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    🙂Whale is not a fish, it is still a mammal.
    🙂Theory of evolution (TOE) does not claim explanation of the first cell, humans still have not found that explanation.
    🙂TOE explains speciation of living beings through random mutations and natural selection.
    🙂Nature does not predict a mutation. All egg and sperm mutations (ie germline mutations) are passed to the offspring, nature does no selection at this stage. These mutations then generate features or flaws in the offspring. If the features are beneficial for the survival and spreading of the organism in its environment then those feature become a commonplace in that population and environment. This is called natural selection.
    🙂Low probability of an event does not mean the event cannot happen. It is very unlikely to get 1000 sixes in a row on a dice in Ludo, however it is not impossible.
    🙂Falsifiability argument: for example, finding a mammal fossil in Cambrian era.
    🙂Thus the TOE is scientific, and it is being used in explaining and predicting evolutionary changes, with applications in cancer research (th-cam.com/video/bsMLbKvSVpc/w-d-xo.html)
    🙂People need to spend time on learning and research in science to progress and benefit from science
    Theory vs Law, Falsification:
    A theory is a set of statements which explain how something happens. eg Atomic theory, Cell theory, Kinetic theory of gases. A theory is used while working with the subject the theory is about. For example someone working with gases should keep in mind the statements of Kinetic theory. A theory is formed after sufficient experimentation by several people. Thus a theory is a collection of facts which the humans have so far understood about a particular subject.
    A law is normally a quantitative relationship between physical quantities, mostly in the form of an equation. eg Boyle's law, Newtons laws of motion.
    A law is not better than a theory and a theory is not better than a law. They have different application and significance. A theory does not become a law with more evidence.
    All knowledge can be challenged. A theory can also be challenged. A law can also be challenged. Eg Einstein challenged the Newton's laws which were thought valid at all speeds, thereby limiting their application to only small speeds.
    Humans have made many theories in the past which were later proven false. eg Caloric theory. Caloric theory explained heat is because of some fluid which flows from a hot body to cold body. Someone challenged it by comparing the weight of a body while it was hot to the weight while it was cold. No difference in weight therefore no fluid. This is how a theory is falsified. Newton's laws were falsified for relativistic speeds when new evidence came in.
    TOE claims that there were no horses when there were dinosaurs. If someone finds a horse fossil next to a dinosaur fossil then the TOE will be proven false. Similarly if someone finds a living organism without cells then this would falsify the cell theory. If someone find stable matter without atoms (neutron, proton, electron etc) then the Atomic theory will be falsified.
    Existing theories and laws can be used to make technology, medicine, improve food and environment, and improve human life.
    Existing theories and laws can be improved by new research. eg Einstein improved Newtons theory of Gravitation.
    New knowledge is created by research. Existing theories and laws and principles serve as a guideline and step stone in this process.
    A theory or a law or any piece of knowledge is not falsified just because someone does not like it.
    The definitions taught in school and college are a very simplified and often inaccurate version. The teachers are not scientists so they do not know the full picture of scientific method and terminology. We should always be open to learn new ideas.
    References (Kennesaw State University: Faculty Web Pages/Ronald Matson/Links/Scientific Laws and Theories
    tinyurl.com/Theory-vs-Law)
    LAW:
    😎1) An empirical generalization; a statement of a biological principle that appears to be without exception at the time it is made, and has become consolidated by repeated successful testing; rule (Lincoln et al., 1990)
    😎2) A theoretical principle deduced from particular facts, applicable to a defined group or class of phenomena, and expressible by a statement that a particular phenomenon always occurs if certain conditions be present (Oxford English Dictionary as quoted in Futuyma, 1979).
    😎3) A set of observed regularities expressed in a concise verbal or mathematical statement. (Krimsley, 1995).
    THEORY:
    😎1) The grandest synthesis of a large and important body of information about some related group of natural phenomena (Moore, 1984)
    😎2) A body of knowledge and explanatory concepts that seek to increase our understanding ("explain") a major phenomenon of nature (Moore, 1984).
    😎3) A scientifically accepted general principle supported by a substantial body of evidence offered to provide an explanation of observed facts and as a basis for future discussion or investigation (Lincoln et al., 1990).
    😎6) An explanation for an observation or series of observations that is substantiated by a considerable body of evidence (Krimsley, 1995).
    ...a law is neither "better than" nor "above" a theory.

    • @MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk
      @MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@DaDdy-lw9bn you say theory!!!
      It means, it is not a scientific law and it can be falsified???

    • @aptesinde5560
      @aptesinde5560 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@MuhammadAhmad-rg4mkgo and read the defination of theory eg. theory of relativity,
      something to be called a theory it has much scientific backing.
      there is difference between hypothesis and theory
      even jakir naik confuses this and lie.

    • @MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk
      @MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aptesinde5560 I read, theory stands on hypothesis and assumptions, don't know why you take theory of evolution so serious, 100s of theories in science proved false and it is not a big deal because 100s of theory proved false then one law will form...

    • @MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk
      @MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aptesinde5560 In your above long discussion I,m unable to find the answer QAR's questions, you are just repeating the same things which I read in my 12th standard....

    • @Ag-Abdulrahman
      @Ag-Abdulrahman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1- Correct
      2- Evolution theory claims that. Life begin from single cell.
      3- there are many scientific articles which challenge random mutation.
      4- Natural selection acts from chromosomes to individual or population level. Suppose if there are mutation in one gene but it supprase by another gene alele?
      5- If something have at low probability but happen many times then it will be not more called low probability. For example six can comes 1000 times. Then try it and prove from experiment.
      Finding an Fossil of mammals tells us about that type of species were presents. Then evolutionist try to put in order means they are supposing not proving through experiment.

  • @ImranShaikh-zb3bx
    @ImranShaikh-zb3bx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    No seculars and evolutionists dare to challenge qaiser bhai😂

    • @babaali7050
      @babaali7050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Did he approach any scientist?
      No.
      Did he wrote any significant paper on criticism of evolution?
      No.
      Is he even a biologist?
      No.
      But at the same time he is philosopher historian biologist religious scholar physicist chemist economist sociologist and political scientist. Sorry if I missed anything.

    • @sssssssss-q7c
      @sssssssss-q7c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@babaali7050i am a muslim but you are right.

    • @ImranShaikh-zb3bx
      @ImranShaikh-zb3bx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you think every secular who criticizes islam is a Mufti ? Or are they an islamic secular. Any one can criticize unless you have evidence

    • @MyPersonalSoch
      @MyPersonalSoch 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeh likhne ke liye aapke paas kaun si digree hai inke claim ko galat sabit karo na @babaali7050

    • @ImranShaikh-zb3bx
      @ImranShaikh-zb3bx 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also all seculars and liberals are Mufti's who criticize islam.

  • @50secs
    @50secs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Read "The devil's delusion" from one of the greatest minds in the science David Berlinski for in depth understanding in English.

    • @Faqr-e-Ghayoor
      @Faqr-e-Ghayoor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Read me...

    • @umairmukhtar8049
      @umairmukhtar8049 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Bro ye konsi awam he Jo qaiser Saab k khilaf comments kr rhe he sb ​@@Faqr-e-Ghayoor

    • @50secs
      @50secs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@umairmukhtar8049 qaiser sahab jahan se seekh ke apko bata rahay hein un mein se aik kitab ka hawala diya hai.

    • @sameerhussain2579
      @sameerhussain2579 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@50secs so you are conveying QAR promotes atheism?

    • @50secs
      @50secs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@sameerhussain2579
      Konsa nasha kia hua hai?

  • @mukhtarbinahamed7740
    @mukhtarbinahamed7740 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Evolution is true

    • @iSohaibKhan
      @iSohaibKhan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Theek hy smjhgya 🤣

    • @go_find_god
      @go_find_god 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Aren’t u Muslim? 😂

    • @Yoyo-dx8wz
      @Yoyo-dx8wz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your forefather altogether can't prove evolution on clinical trail

    • @mukhtarbinahamed7740
      @mukhtarbinahamed7740 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @AliAsghar-rl2fg science ka samna sare religion rejected ha Islam boltha ha kohi moon par kohi land nahi kar sakta lakin India China America to moon par land kar chuka ha this is proof that baki religion ki tarah Islam vi jhutha ha

    • @QamarulHassan-hu9hn
      @QamarulHassan-hu9hn หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @AliAsghar-rl2fg a biogenesis is not possible in today's oxidative atmosphere, at that time the atmosphere was different so it was probably possible back then.

  • @MuhammadZubair-mp6cm
    @MuhammadZubair-mp6cm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Hafiz sb, watched your first video because of your guest. And I’m subscribing you

  • @rayyan361
    @rayyan361 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love from India ❤️

  • @user-jw2bk1ny3m
    @user-jw2bk1ny3m 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hafiz Shariq sahib Qaiser sahib ko ans mukamal krnay dain. Ap kafi jaldbazi se kam le rahay ha

    • @hmshariq
      @hmshariq  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Counter format tha program

  • @ajfamous143
    @ajfamous143 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Nothing is more dangerous than ignorance.

    • @manjuralahi6504
      @manjuralahi6504 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What a comment😂? Ignorance is relative Still scientists doesn’t know about 0.001 percent about our Universe.

    • @sakibchowdrey7152
      @sakibchowdrey7152 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ignorance is bliss.

    • @Converted_Muslim
      @Converted_Muslim 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Like you ignoree god

  • @mohdsiddique9796
    @mohdsiddique9796 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Right sir..

  • @ankurkalita2922
    @ankurkalita2922 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How can you evolve when this kind of intellectual in your society,

    • @Converted_Muslim
      @Converted_Muslim 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Ye to random process hai apnee ap hota hai tum kaha evolve hue ho
      How the world come from nothing

  • @baanoooo
    @baanoooo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    بہترین جوابات راجہ صاحب ❤️

  • @shahzaibawan1970
    @shahzaibawan1970 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Qaiser bhai❤❤

  • @rabisiddiqui6127
    @rabisiddiqui6127 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ye to bataen evolution wale phele male aya ya female

  • @whoiswho234
    @whoiswho234 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Perfect Qaiser bhai

  • @theodiatraderjay
    @theodiatraderjay 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Please come and debate with Adam seeker youtube and Exmuslim Sahil youtube. Any momin is welcome to come and debate.

    • @QamarHusain-e3z
      @QamarHusain-e3z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Amir haq k paas jao ek gaya thaa dubara jaane k naam nii liya😂😂😂😂

  • @abraizahmed
    @abraizahmed หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice

  • @mfvohra101
    @mfvohra101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Surah sajda verse 6-9!

  • @S.HDanial
    @S.HDanial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Dude is confused between Darwinism and modern scientific Evolution 😂😂😂😂.If Archimedes introduced Mechanism that doesnt mean that we are studying Classical Mechanics till this date or no changes took place in it now we have Statistical to Quantum Mechanics similary we have modern form of Evolution with different scientific theories.You really need update your self and stufy Scientific Evolution beyond Darwanisnism

  • @cineshop2529
    @cineshop2529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Qar sahib you are most suited in this field than wasting your time on mirza plumber

    • @CatGirl635
      @CatGirl635 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ye is field may kasy suited hain? Biologists hain ye? Or agar biologists nhi b hain to agar ink pas itny hi koi bharay proves hain to international level py jayn or biologists ko gulat sabat kr dyn?

    • @cineshop2529
      @cineshop2529 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CatGirl635 he had debated with foreign bloggers too watch it

  • @FearAllahOne
    @FearAllahOne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great

  • @Yasirknowledgeofficial
    @Yasirknowledgeofficial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ❤❤ mashallah good work ❤❤❤

  • @goharmehmood5469
    @goharmehmood5469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ماشاءاللہ

  • @AnnuSingham-h8d
    @AnnuSingham-h8d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    राजा एक बहुत बड़ा साइंटिस्ट है इसको भाई भेजो मंगल पर नई खोज के लिए

    • @PHALANGE1931
      @PHALANGE1931 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      😂😂😂 Allah taala ne inn sabke dimaag pure taala lagya diya hai 🤣🤣

  • @Converted_Muslim
    @Converted_Muslim 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How nothing to intellectual something and non living to living

  • @babaali7050
    @babaali7050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Here I am publically challenging Raja to debate me in the presence of 5 logicans and 10 biologists. physical debate. Not online.
    Logicans will keep strict eye on arguments.
    Biologists will keep an eye on data presented. 2 molecular biologists. 2 anatomists. 2 paleontologists. One botanist and one zoologist.
    If I lose, I will accept that evolutionary theory is just a belief of some atheist biologists. If he loses, he will publicly announce, on social media as well, that evolutionary theory is a fact based theory and not an opinion of few biologists. Lets see if can accept the challenge.
    These charlatans can talk in front of innocent people who have no deeper understanding of issue at hand. He dabated with non experts and atheists which little knowledge of subject. 10 biologists and 5 logicians. Dare to accept it.
    Kul ke Gazali wali video pay kutton wali hoi hai iski. 2 mints nhe bol skta Gazali k defence main. Jis k sath debate kr raha tha wo bunda philosophy ka student nikal aya. Iski bolti bund ho gae. 3 hours main 10 mints bhe sahe say nhe bol ska. Isko smjh he nhe arhe the k wo kah kya raha hai. Iska hawa nikal k rakh de agaly bunday na 10 mints main.
    Is k sath kutton wali hoti hai phir bhe baaz nhe ata. Sahe dheet bunda hai ye.

    • @DontOpenThisChannel
      @DontOpenThisChannel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Join his stream

    • @babaali7050
      @babaali7050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@DontOpenThisChannel I will not join his stream. My challenge is clear. It should be live ij presence of 10 biologists and two logicans. If he is strong in his claim, he should come in front of experts, not innocent public who are unaware of subtle subject matters. It is easy to fabricate and lie in front of people not in front to experts. I am ready to come in front of experts.

    • @CheemaAMC1979
      @CheemaAMC1979 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aap ka ghussa deikh kar tou lagta hai QAR ne aap ki mama K Saath Kutti waali ki hai.

    • @mrmgs2210
      @mrmgs2210 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You got to disprove him and save us all You came to this channel right? Or were you invited.
      Why don't you debate these guys
      th-cam.com/video/3TrwJOx-kUM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=DHEeE_hMtxIF4APZ

    • @NoobMaster-jq6gb
      @NoobMaster-jq6gb 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This debate should be held in auditorium halls where you both are filmed live and biologist guys are sitting there.. taking notes also this debate goes live on all social media platforms .. you both should prepare so well for this .. and this should be honest with a solid conclusion

  • @akhlaqahmedmt1514
    @akhlaqahmedmt1514 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Polemist? What kind of experts are these?

  • @JaspreetSingh-f1o
    @JaspreetSingh-f1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I want to tell all my Pakistani brothers that the sun doesn't rise from the east and fall west.😅😅😅

    • @mohammadshafaq8919
      @mohammadshafaq8919 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No need to tell us because quran doesn't say that anywhere. But yes tell that to your local newspaper or your phone which says "sun will rise at this time tomorrow". Got the point? It's just for your reference. Even today in 21st century when we know it as fact we still use the term "sun rise" and "sun set". That is exactly why Allah referred to it from the perspective of Zul Qarnain (a human).

    • @JaspreetSingh-f1o
      @JaspreetSingh-f1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @mohammadshafaq8919, but bro, earth is static. Isn't? This is mention in Quran

    • @iSohaibKhan
      @iSohaibKhan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We all know that, when we say sun rises or sun sets, we says it because we're observing the sun from the earth, so w.r.t earth we say it like that

    • @mrmgs2210
      @mrmgs2210 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@JaspreetSingh-f1owhere? Reference from Quran please?

    • @JaspreetSingh-f1o
      @JaspreetSingh-f1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mrmgs2210 Sunan an-Nasa'i 3320 😄😄

  • @arunendrasingh7469
    @arunendrasingh7469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All Religions were just an early attempts of humans to understand their surroundings and give possible answers. Please dont just stuck with ideologies, we need to develop scientific temperament ❤

    • @mrmgs2210
      @mrmgs2210 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Any evidence on your claim?

  • @ahsananwar5074
    @ahsananwar5074 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love you qar sir pal k rkho atheists ko

  • @kamransiddiqui6350
    @kamransiddiqui6350 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I accidentally stumbled upon this video, can't believe that in this day and age people are still debating about evolution with such lame arguments. There is a plethora of fossil and genetic evidence that clearly demonstrate the link between living species. On the other hand creationist are not obliged to present any evidence, you just have to have faith. Science does not say that it got answers for every question but it's the right tool to find the truth. If it one day finds God, so be it.

    • @nameless4014
      @nameless4014 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      what can you expect, most people in Pakistan still thinks that when a scientific theory turns into a scientific law then it is accepted... this single sentence has so many problems that a person can write a book on it.

    • @manjuralahi6504
      @manjuralahi6504 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@nameless4014Can you prove history? Evolution is also like that, it is not proven as 2+2=4, you can gather thousand of small evidence in this regard but it doesn’t proof evolution is correct 100%.

    • @nameless4014
      @nameless4014 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@manjuralahi6504 2+2=4 is not a scientific theory and not every scientific theory has to have an equation to prove it, you don't prove scientific theories you fail to reject the hypothesis. You have this misconception that once something is proven then it is real, it doesn't work like that. I don't think you know anything about science or philosophy of science, to be honest.

    • @CommonManMTahoorH
      @CommonManMTahoorH 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You see links between species, that is not at all evidence for cross specie evolution.
      Links are not good enough evidence for such a big claim of cross specie evolution.
      Its is as absurd as me saying that you are not the son of your father because you have similarities in facial features with your friends father. Now, it can be true that you're not your father's real son, but this evidence is too less to make that claim as a fact.
      The reason creation theory is not required to give proofs, is because that is based on faith and belief. A creationist never says I have scientific proof for my claim.

    • @nameless4014
      @nameless4014 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CommonManMTahoorH Even before the inception of evolutionary theory people knew about the links between species. If that's all you got from evolution then you have not taken the first step towards learning evolution. You talked about an individual as a example without knowing that evolution doesn't deal with individuals, it deals population so your example is meaningless. Lets forget about evolution for a second. I have a simple question for you. Can you name the standard by which in philosophy of science a theory is accepted?

  • @nameless4014
    @nameless4014 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He thinks evolution is not a scientific theory because of philosophy of science? does he even know the standard of philosophy of science to which a theory is accepted? This guy is the champion of Muslims? rofl

    • @nameless4014
      @nameless4014 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nothing can be proven with 100% certainty. The sun "rise" everyday, even if we all disappear right now it will still rise everyday. It can be proven through math and physics that it will rise tomorrow but the probability of sun rising tomorrow is only 99.9%. It's never 100%, even the sun not giving 100% certainty what chance you have with your 2+2=4?. Proven things are not 100% correct.

  • @NobodyUk.
    @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Evidence k bina god ko represent kar sakte h 😊?

    • @MustafizulIslam-w2y
      @MustafizulIslam-w2y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We are religious people that's our faith .But science wants proof ,then give proper evidence of evolution.

    • @NobodyUk.
      @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MustafizulIslam-w2y faith boldiya to jhagda hi khatam mera faith h 👽 alien ne hame banaya.

    • @NobodyUk.
      @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Faith to kisi ka kuch bhi ho sakta h.

    • @NobodyUk.
      @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk Haa 😃 hamara Darwin per faith nahi h kal ko khuda ya alien aagaye to hum taiyar h.aaoka kiya hoga alien aane pe

    • @MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk
      @MuhammadAhmad-rg4mk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@NobodyUk. Have you ever seen an alien??

  • @BRMUSLIM
    @BRMUSLIM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ✅❤️

  • @Kumar-Shivang
    @Kumar-Shivang 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm pretty sure that neither of them have read any book but Qur'an, Hadith and commentaries on them

  • @aiyubaliseikh2474
    @aiyubaliseikh2474 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Every second of this is wadte of internet,time,oxygen, food that they have eTen till date wTer they drank,brain that has developed in their all are waste

  • @1234fsdfdsf
    @1234fsdfdsf หลายเดือนก่อน

    Has anyone seen a chicken? This is a completely artificial animal bred by humans. Same for Dogs and Cats... Persians cats. Horses.

  • @drijazdurrani
    @drijazdurrani หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mr Qaiser Ahmed Raja is devolving . Be careful!!

  • @AcroFitness
    @AcroFitness 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Evolution can not be denied just like that.. science is only a discovery of what Allah Azzawajal has created.
    And Allah is the best of planners, He does everything in a systematic way not in a random way that's why Allah encourage us to ponder over things to get to know how Allah does things in such a perfect manner.
    If it was just a random act, Allah would have never told us to ponder because there won't be an answer, only a deadend.
    So we need to understand this with an open mind.

    • @Dentistsamaksh
      @Dentistsamaksh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      please give evidence of Allah

    • @AcroFitness
      @AcroFitness 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dentistsamaksh Sure!
      We are talking about Evolution so that's take this into account the first cell that scientists claim came into existence by itself has been debunked by the renowned scientist by the name of Lewis Pasteur. He proved it by an experiment that abiogenesis can never happen (No living thing can come out of a non-living matter) so there must be someone who made that one cell and the whole chain of life started. Because today when we can provide a very controlled environment and still can't produce a single cell out of nothing?
      That's the first point!!!

    • @AcroFitness
      @AcroFitness 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dentistsamaksh and the second point is the conscious of human beings. The way we think, reason, learn and make decisions (which differentiates us against animals and makes us human beings who can build the technology and infrastructures like we have today) is impossible to be considered that this was a result of evolution.
      Because for doing all that, a prior cognitive function is required otherwise we would be no different than animals.
      And that's why Evolution theory is not considered a fact yet because it has these loopholes which can't be answered if you take the God's equation out of it.

    • @AcroFitness
      @AcroFitness 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dentistsamaksh and Finally, all the points I have just mentioned are also considered by the worlds most renowned scientist of this time "Michio Kaku" who actually introduced the term "God's Equation"
      I would very much appreciate that.

    • @iSohaibKhan
      @iSohaibKhan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Jazbati ho k adha podcast dekha hoga or sunn nhi pae hoge jbhi ye comment krdia
      Evolution ko koi deny nhi krrha, yehi baat shuru me boli na QAR ne k islam total deny nhi krta evolution ko islam deny krta hy darwin theory ko "ek cell tha jo aese atmosphere me jahn uska scientifically hona possible hi nhi wo apne aap khdse agya or wo through time evolve hota raha or ek specie dusre me convert hoti chali gai" Islam ko ikhtelaf hy is concept se. Agr apko ye scientifc fact sabit krna hy to through science krden sabit, k wo cell kese aya, kese evolve hua or hm kya usko aj test krskte hyn? jisse ye establish hojae k han 100% darwin ki theory me jo evoluion ka concept dia hy wohi evolution hui hy

  • @lionrafale6940
    @lionrafale6940 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bhai Baat puri hone de

  • @tayibatmuscat1474
    @tayibatmuscat1474 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    قیصر بھائی آپ انسانی ارتقاء کا انکار کرتے ہیں تو آپ قرآن کے منکر ہیں
    معاذاللہ
    کیونکہ قرآن پاک میں اللہ تعالیٰ خود کہتا ہے کہ
    سورہ نوح : واللہ انبتکم من العرض نباتا
    ثم یعیدکم فیہا و یخرجکم اخراجا،

    • @tayibatmuscat1474
      @tayibatmuscat1474 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      یہ مسلمان علماء کا کام ہے کہ وہ اس آیت کی روشنی میں آدم علیہ السلام تک انسانی تخلیق کی کڑیاں جوڑیں

    • @tayibatmuscat1474
      @tayibatmuscat1474 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      سائنسدانوں نے اپنا کام کر دیا اب ہم اپنی تحقیق کریں

    • @tayibatmuscat1474
      @tayibatmuscat1474 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      یہ کہہ کر کہ سائنسدان ارتقاء کے عمل اللہ تعالیٰ سے منسوب نہیں کرتے تو یہ ہمارے نہ ماننے کی وجہ ہے تو افسوس، کیونکہ ہم جانتے ہیں کہ اللہ تعالیٰ کی مرضی کے بغیر ایک پتا بھی نہیں ہلتا تو اس پر بحث ہونی ہی نہیں چاہیے، اس کو اکسکیوز بنانا اپنی نالائقی پر پردہ ڈالنے کے مترادف ہے

    • @tayibatmuscat1474
      @tayibatmuscat1474 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      انسانی ارتقاء پر ایک اور آیت : ہل اتا علی الانسان حین امندہر لم یکم شی مذکورہ
      یعنی انسانی ارتقاء کے وہ ادوار جب وہ جراثیم اور کیڑوں کے مراحل میں تھا
      پھر آدمی کی شکل تک پہنچا، اب بھی وہ جانور کی ایک قسم تھا، جب روح ڈالی گئی تو وہ انسان بنا اور وہ پہلا انسان آدم علیہ السلام تھے

  • @MrCake-ui8uo
    @MrCake-ui8uo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kafi makhlooq me evolution hua hai..lekin vo Allah ne design aisa kiya hai..jabhi ye hua.

  • @Converted_Muslim
    @Converted_Muslim 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Inhone baat sahi kahi hai lekin atheist ko accha nahi lagega so log bhadash nikalne kee liye ya apne ap ko sahi dikhane ke liye comments kardete hai so

  • @Thinking-beyond
    @Thinking-beyond 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Allah ka name Al Bari ha.. the evolver or qaiser ka islam me isko guzaish ni... Islam or dunia me har cheeez evolutions k tehad hi chal rhi ha... Koi aik cheez asi ni ha ko evolve na hoti ho.. insan ka bacha b peda hota ha 9mnth evolve hota birth k bad evolve hota...

    • @iSohaibKhan
      @iSohaibKhan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mere bhai wohi bola na k hm musllims total deny nhi krte evolution ka hm deny krta hy darwin theory ko "k ek cell tha jo khd kahin se agya wahn jahn uska ana possible nhi tha or wo through time evolve hua or ek specie dusri me convert hoti chaligai" hamem isse problem hy k ye aap science bna k na paish kren aap iska pehle scientifc evidence deden then isko scientifc fact declare kren hm b maan lenge

    • @Thinking-beyond
      @Thinking-beyond 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iSohaibKhan me b kb darwin ko thek bol rha hn.. but masla humre han b to ha jis trhaa adam ko hum ne piti ka putla bna kr pesh kiya hwa wo Quran me ha ni.. hadees jisko iski bunyad bnaya jata uski understanding b ghalat ha.. Adam evolve hwe ha ye Quran me khud bayan hwa ha.. Allah ne hr cheez ko pani se banya ha.. kiyaa ye evolution ni ha?? Bar bar Allah ne 1 1 chez ko bnaya ha?? Har cheez ko 1 jan se peda kia ha.. yahan hum wo jan adam bna kr bethy ha .. cell b ho skta ha.. q k Allah ne dusri jaga jb humte zikr ha wahan bta dia ha tm sb adam ki olad ho.. jb jahan tkhleeek ka zikr ha wahan batya ha sb 1 se jan peda kia ha... Or pani ka b bta dia .. ye wo sb baten ha jo hunre classical ulma ni smjhty na manty ha ..
      Quran keh rha ha zamany me insan or asa wakt guzr chuka ha jb wo kabil zikr cheez ni tha.. iski jo 3 explanation di jati ha wo mazak lgti ha... Q k ayat me wazia Allah ne btaya ha zamany me asa wakt guzar chuka ha... Khair.. basic masla ye ha evolution hwi b ho khud ja khud kse ho sakti ha.. science ka kam to bs ye btana ha ase ase hwa ya ye ye possible way ha.. ab us par athiest scientists khud ba khud hony ka dawa mrs ro bs ye un k mu ki baten ha.. science ni.. humre han ye fark btaya jata ni ..

  • @S.HDanial
    @S.HDanial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lol,Evolution isn't a part of Philosophy but a Scientific- studies,so proved your bogus pseudo scientific claims by following the scientific principles.#ScientificEvolutionistrue

  • @ahmedsyed921
    @ahmedsyed921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    اللہ قرآن میں کہتا ہے
    کہہ دو زمین میں گھوم پھر کر دیکھو تو سہی کہ اللہ نے تخلیق کی ابتدا کیسے کی
    Al quran 29:20
    اب یہ قیصر صاحب جو بائیبل کے پیدائش کے چیپٹر کو اسلام بنا کے پیش کر رہے ہیں تو مجھے بتائیں قرآن کی اس آیت کا مفہوم کیا سمجھا جائے؟
    اگر آدم کو جنت میں کہیں پیدا کیا تھا تو پھر میں زمین میں چل پھر کر کیا دیکھوں زندگی کی ابتدا کے بارے میں؟
    میں کوئی دس کے قریب ریفرنس دے سکتا ہوں قرآن سے نظریہ ارتقاء کی سپورٹ میں ۔
    قیصر صاحب کیا آپ ہمیں قرآن سے اپنی بات ثابت کر سکتے ہیں؟
    مسلہ آپ کا یہ ہے کہ آپ نے خود سے نہ قرآن پڑھا ہے نہ سمجھا ہے ورنہ ایسی بات کبھی نہ کرتے

    • @Main-event_Muhammad024
      @Main-event_Muhammad024 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're on, sir!
      Let's get off: bother supporting evidence to your claims!

    • @ahmedsyed921
      @ahmedsyed921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Main-event_Muhammad024
      Could you please give me your interpretation or understanding of this verse of the Quran please?

  • @TheCuriousBeliever
    @TheCuriousBeliever 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Adam alaihissalam se pehle jinnat ka zameen par fitna w fasaad phelana farishton ne dekha tha isliye unhe laga jo nayi makhlooq hogi ho sakta hai woh bhi aisa hi kare.

  • @abubakar8863
    @abubakar8863 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Adda tu science dan da bachyaa😂

  • @chaisma
    @chaisma 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @NobodyUk.
    @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1 paw jalebi

    • @iSohaibKhan
      @iSohaibKhan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      te doodh v

  • @NobodyUk.
    @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aap bhi to islam ko manvane per tule h.

    • @iSohaibKhan
      @iSohaibKhan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aaap na mano debate hy aap apne aqeedon me khush raho hm apne me aap apne aqeede ko science na kaho wrna science se sabit krdo
      Koi b theory scientific fact tb banti hy jb usay test kia jae experiment k through or observe kia jae jo apke case me 2no possible nhi na hm evolution ko observe krskte hyn aj ki date me or experiment to krskte hyn but koi kr nhi raha q k krne walon ko b pta hy its not possible
      Wesa mera ek sawal hy evolution insan pe aakr ruk q gai? Insan jo k intelligent b hy wo khdko evolve krke mazeed better makhlooq q nhi bnarha? or jo intelligent makhloq thien b nhi wo evolve krgaien or insan tk safar teh krlia ek cell se
      Insane logic bro

    • @NobodyUk.
      @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iSohaibKhan evolution Rukti nahi bas 100 saal ki life me evolution ko human me dekhna mumkin nahi. Aapne kutta dekha h dog 50,000 saal pehle kesa tha?

    • @NobodyUk.
      @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iSohaibKhan or ye kis chomu ne khaha theory scenes nahi hoti

    • @NobodyUk.
      @NobodyUk. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@iSohaibKhan theory of relativity scenes nahi h kiya?

  • @truthteller-b9y
    @truthteller-b9y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    qaiser Raja har debate me pit kar aate hai pahle haris sultan se pite ab ahmadi muslim se pite

    • @Faqr-e-Ghayoor
      @Faqr-e-Ghayoor 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😅😅😅😅. Challo probationary period nikalo

    • @-wp6oi
      @-wp6oi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Harish shru hi bola atheist koi Morialty hoti nahi

    • @truthteller-b9y
      @truthteller-b9y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@-wp6oi bookish morality nahi hoti atheist ki .... atheist sabse jyada moral hote hai dunia me

    • @-wp6oi
      @-wp6oi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ghor se padho koi morality nahi hoti
      Osme book ha hi nahi

    • @-wp6oi
      @-wp6oi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      kitne moral hote sab ko pata
      Bante isliye pabandiyon limitations nikle Or jo chiye kare

  • @Naruto-oj8qs
    @Naruto-oj8qs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is he really learn about evolution 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

    • @aliso5987
      @aliso5987 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You need to learn english first.

    • @Naruto-oj8qs
      @Naruto-oj8qs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aliso5987 hahaha isko evolution ka ghanta pata nahi aur yeh mera challange

    • @aliso5987
      @aliso5987 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Naruto-oj8qs it's ok. Mr . Evolution. Learn english first

    • @Naruto-oj8qs
      @Naruto-oj8qs 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aliso5987 you learn evolution

    • @aliso5987
      @aliso5987 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Naruto-oj8qs learn the philosophy of science. I am more educated then your whole generation.

  • @theodiatraderjay
    @theodiatraderjay 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Muslim prospective😅😅

  • @karama709
    @karama709 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    La ilah il Allah Darwin Rasulallah

    • @iSohaibKhan
      @iSohaibKhan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ye dekho naam nihad pakistani/indian atheist jisko atheism ka kakh nhi pta aese phuddu ye cheezen isliye follow krte hyn q k dunniya ko bta saken k hm b exist krte hyn hmara b koi opinion hy, hm kch alg krrhe hyn q k hm cool hyn
      PHUDDU CHND 🤣

    • @akhtarrasool7794
      @akhtarrasool7794 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes we as a Muslim don't have any problem with your such believes. We have problem when you portray your belief as a scientific fact.

  • @wwaqashussain
    @wwaqashussain 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    na yai scientists hai na religious scholar, kisi scientist ko bulao

    • @iSohaibKhan
      @iSohaibKhan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Aap scientist k forums dekhlen ja k more than 70% darwin theory me nhi mante or wo khd b atheist or agnostics hyn or jo mante hyn they are just popular scientist jinki waja se ye useless concept baicha jata hy awam me

  • @Mak32189
    @Mak32189 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    fradiya

    • @-wp6oi
      @-wp6oi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tumre level ki baten nahi ye

  • @ala7515
    @ala7515 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Raja the evolutionary drama 😂

  • @JaspreetSingh-f1o
    @JaspreetSingh-f1o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    میں آپ سب کو یقین دلانا چاہتا ہوں کہ کوئی ایسا آدم نہیں ہے جس نے انسان دوست کہا ہو اور اگر آپ سب پاکستانی ترقی کرنا چاہتے ہیں تو تمام مولوی مولانا کو باہر نکال دیں😂😂

    • @-wp6oi
      @-wp6oi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Koi wahiguru nahi

    • @-wp6oi
      @-wp6oi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sing sab

  • @storyverse705
    @storyverse705 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🤧

  • @BEST_AUTO_SALE
    @BEST_AUTO_SALE 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Quran is also copied from Tora Bible Persian culture roman myths and Greeks culture

    • @MR-dz7wh
      @MR-dz7wh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      WHAT A JOKE STOP WATCHING FAKE EX MUSLIMS THEY ARE SPREDING FALSE PROPAGANDA AGAINST ISLAM

  • @kamransiddiqui6350
    @kamransiddiqui6350 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I accidentally stumbled upon this video, can't believe that in this day and age people are still debating about evolution with such lame arguments. There is a plethora of fossil and genetic evidence that clearly demonstrate the link between living species. On the other hand creationist are not obliged to present any evidence, you just have to have faith. Science does not say that it got answers for every question but it's the right tool to find the truth. If it one day finds God, so be it.