Francis Fukuyama, What is Development?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ส.ค. 2014
  • Encina Hall, Stanford University
    2013
    Francis Fukuyama
    cddrl.stanford.edu/people/fuku...
    What is Development?
    This lecture was presented as part of the 2013 Draper Hills Summer Fellows Program.
    Launched in 2005, the Draper Hills Summer Fellowship on Democracy and Development Program (DHSFDD) is a three-week academic training program that is hosted annually at Stanford University's Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law. The program brings together a group of 25 to 30 mid-career practitioners in law, politics, government, private enterprise, civil society, and international development from transitioning countries. This training program provides a unique forum for emerging leaders to connect, exchange experiences, and receive academic training to enrich their knowledge and advance their work.
    For three weeks during the summer, fellows participate in academic seminars that expose them to the theory and practice of democracy, development, and the rule of law. Delivered by leading Stanford faculty from the Stanford Law School, the Graduate School of Business, and the departments of economics and political science, these seminars allow emerging leaders to explore new institutional models and frameworks to enhance their ability to promote democratic change in their home countries.
    More on Draper Hills: draperhills.stanford.edu/
    More on CDDRL: cddrl.stanford.edu/

ความคิดเห็น • 56

  • @moqemomari
    @moqemomari 9 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    This is maybe one of the most important issues in today's' world but i guess everyone is busy watching cuty cat clips

  • @SusanSt.James-33
    @SusanSt.James-33 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    That characterization of Kenya is so apt. Ours is a neo-patrimonial state. The state serves the ruler and allied insiders. The state is not impersonal to all, equally.

  • @coveredmedia
    @coveredmedia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent Mr. Fukuyama

  • @abebawtegegne8545
    @abebawtegegne8545 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for your rich knowlege,

  • @flicksbyhans
    @flicksbyhans 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am from PNG and I think he did justice to try and use it as an example of the extreme

  • @nkosanamaphosa4971
    @nkosanamaphosa4971 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Superb presentation!

  • @natureeye8953
    @natureeye8953 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Lots of information i got. Thanks.

  • @christophercolt44
    @christophercolt44 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Excellent teacher.

  • @barumbadum
    @barumbadum 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot for the video.....

  • @DavidMorley123
    @DavidMorley123 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Videographer: Please try to show both the speaker and his slides at once. The easiest solution is to zoom out so that the video essentially replicates what the audience experiences: (often) a large slide with a smaller speaker. The best solution is to show the slide with a smaller inset of the speaker. Otherwise, always a pleasure to hear the ideas of Fukuyama.

    • @roc7880
      @roc7880 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      imagination is the best teacher.

  • @mihaiserbu8447
    @mihaiserbu8447 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just amazing !!

  • @eye2eyeerigavo777
    @eye2eyeerigavo777 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Highly packed variables in development but parametricing further is the way to decipher interactions between them...

  • @SusanSt.James-33
    @SusanSt.James-33 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In short development is about economic development; social development; and political development.

  • @84Terminator
    @84Terminator 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    His scales apply on GCC states more than any other countries.

  • @heminmirkhan2929
    @heminmirkhan2929 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Kurdistan of Iraq is planning to go through harsh reforms in the public sector. Professor Fukuyama's dimension of development could be a genuine​ roadmap to proceed.

  • @edofitsum501
    @edofitsum501 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    i see it

  • @SuperYouthful
    @SuperYouthful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You are my FUTURE meal ticket for the CIA. Of course I will make sure THAT WE CAN always WIN IN the FUTURE.

  • @diegocortes6262
    @diegocortes6262 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That comparison between Papua New Guinea and San Francisco is problematic, to say the least. The comparison must between communitarian societies AND the life in underdeveloped cities where people do not have access to services. Other than that is to compare the Real Madrid with a team from a minor league in the global south.

  • @SuperYouthful
    @SuperYouthful 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I STAND by MY WORK IN this SOCIETY. This ALIEN is LIVING with me everyday FOR over three months now and I'LL GET you some WORK TO do WITH OUR PRESIDENT OF AMERICA.

  • @eahannan
    @eahannan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The term development came about around the 1950s, probably came from biology
    Marx had a mechanistic view of societies developing until eventually we get to Communism.
    - economic growth : increasing per capita GDP
    - Clarke - little development from 1200- about 1800
    - unprecedented rate of economic growth has to do with political institutions: State, Rule of Law etc,
    - western europe and north America began to grow , buy other parts of the developing world saw a drop in their GDP.
    Social mobilisation is the 2nd measure of development.
    In China living as peasants are all of a sudden City dwellers .
    - anthropologists like going to Papua new Guinea because they are relatively untouched by development.
    -

  • @user-dq6gu1hy2y
    @user-dq6gu1hy2y 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dunno

  • @mistycloud4455
    @mistycloud4455 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A.G.I Will be man's last invention

  • @rayhanisa6812
    @rayhanisa6812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    please add language

  • @calendarcalendar3838
    @calendarcalendar3838 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    At 7:05 Fukuyama notes that the sharp increase in productivity is not the result of new technology or resource, it's a change of the Political System. While this may sound conceited (if you're a Political Philosopher) I think he's right. . . changing the Political institutions can free up people to be MORE productive. . . but he won't consider the obvious conclusion. . . and being so Obvious, it is often ignored. . . that if CHANGING the POLITICAL system was the only variable sufficient to cause a SPIKE in Productivity, then it was the Political System that was retarding the increased output. . . therefore, the Political Structure can trap it's citizens in less-than-middle-class jobs . . . Government is formed to Serve it's citizens. . . and restrictions in economic growth is generally not a good idea.

    • @xandercorp6175
      @xandercorp6175 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Restricting economic growth is usually a tradeoff in stability, security, resistance to shocks, etc.

  • @SuperYouthful
    @SuperYouthful 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love you. And if you want proof, how about 5 years of CELIBACY IN the FUTURE WITH OUR FRIENDS IN YOUR OWN BUSINESS as we CAN GET a JOB WITH her HUSBAND IN law SCHOOL IN OUR CURRENT RELATIONSHIP TOGETHER WITH EACH OTHER. I wanna get a PhD in her HUSBAND's law SCHOOL IN new YORK CITY where she LIVES TOGETHER WITH her OWN FAMILY IN this SOCIETY.

  • @user-ln1il9zf3j
    @user-ln1il9zf3j 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    나 이거 왜 듣냐...

  • @voltaire6668
    @voltaire6668 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's painful to have to watch him pull teeth from the "emerging leaders" who do not seem well informed or able to connect the dots. Just give the lecture!!

  • @music-nm7hv
    @music-nm7hv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This guy messed up everything...

    • @i-nodt8505
      @i-nodt8505 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How?

    • @Arbognire
      @Arbognire 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      …because of his book I suppose, huh❔

    • @belisariocadmomachaieie119
      @belisariocadmomachaieie119 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely. An historically biased narrative.

  • @benjamin_markus
    @benjamin_markus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shameless apologist.