I watched Judge Faith for so long that I understand a bit better of the law. Now people are gonna be shocked when they find out I know the law a bit while trying to swindle me 😏
Right lol defendant looked like a coke addict. Little twitchy and kept sniffling. Seen way too many of those in court not to be able to see it right away.
I wouldn't give her a dime if I dropped that phone. We both were drunk and she handed me her phone to take a picture...really?🙄...Girl have several seats...it was an accident...
This is why you protect your phone . My ex friend had her phone on the table and another girl at the table spilled MY drink on her phone . My ex friend calls me the next day about it . I was like I knew this ish was going to happen but I have nothing to do with that I did not spill the drink even tho it was mine , goodbye .
Lol we dont do that where i live. Who ever spills the drink its there fault no matter whos drink it was. But lol we don't expect our friends to replace fones like that no matter whos fault it is , we just get another one ourselves.
Can't even wrap my head around this. Your friend mistakenly dropped your 📱 and you ask her to pay for it? And drove two hours to her place of work to collect 150$ and ended up sharing a 70$ dollar meal with her, while waiting for 150$? this is beyond stupid!!
First Case - this woman drove two hours and spent $70 on a dinner, but is whining about a phone being paid? She obviously got money. She is being extremely petty and to send the court documents to her job was even worse.
Marcus A That's happened to almost everybody. You hand something over and you both lose grip on it. It's noone's fault. She's no friend, she a money grubber Beeatch.
Marcus A she probably works for her money too so I guess she can be petty all she wants if she paid for it with her money. (however she's a friend so dropping a phone between real friends shouldn't. really matter, but you know some people) but the court documents thing that's petty if they were friends I'm sure she knows where she was living
Case 1: Judge Judy would have said, "You stated in a text that you would pay her, therefore, I'm ordering you to pay her." Even if the plaintiff was wacky.
Jason Gates The contention of the plaintiff was that the defendant broke her phone and therefore owed her the money. Since the loss was accidental, under the law she cannot compel the defendant to pay, and the defendants under no obligation to pay despite what she promised. The rulings in these cases are based on law, not our feelings about what is "fair". The defendant needs to get accident insurance on her next phone.
I disagree with you even tho was accident and plaintiff couldn't prove 100% that the defendant fault and as in the message she promised her to pay so the defendant need to pay at least half the price.
so the judge could have ruled either way. On one hand yes she could have agreed to pay for a portion of the price of the phone. %00 or what ever would have been too much especially since it was a phone that was used so it would have depreciated in value anyways. The question is is the defendant responsible. If it was how they described and it slipped and especially if they were both moderately intoxicated it actually can void any responsibility. Reasonable care was made because it wasn't like she was saying .. hey hold on to my phone for the day and she lost it. Bottom line the girl who is the plaintiff spent way to much money trying to recover something that wasn't even worth the money that she spent. She should have cut her losses or got her friend to pay her by the sunday.. and chilled..should have not shown up at the job and probably cut the loss in the first place or... get a good case.
She only talked about paying $150 in the text messages. She said 50 now, 100 later. The plaintiff raise the price to 600. Uh no, the phone isn’t worth that much and she didn’t agree to that. The defendant should have to pay the 150 but should win her harassment argument
This girl is Extra suing a girl for dropping her phone and travelling two hours to stress her out spending $70 plus fuel ⛽️ then filed a £50 lawsuit ... what bullshit?!
yeah but your missing one thing here,,,,, when u sent court documents to someone job they might lose there job all because she wanted her money come on now she knew where she lived she could have sent them there instead of her job. sending court documents to someone job is way more then petty its stuptidy.
I love the defendant in de 2nd case... when you tell the truth you have nothing to worry about... and I do believe the plaintiff stole his items out of the boat, I mean if he could manage to steal the boat itself!!!
She agreed to pay $100. From what I hear. She should have paid that. However for $600? And then send the documents to the defendants work? Drove 2 hours to her work paid $70 for dinner, and then worried about her following her on twitter? She handled the whole situation unprofessionally. She wasn't negligent. It was an accident!!
First case, not sure about the ruling becuz even tho it was an accident it still was gonna cost to get fixed or replaced. Reallly no different from having a car accident and even tho it was an accident, dat person is at fault and they have to pay or their insurance. Not even halfway into the second case I knew dat the plaintiff wasn't gonna win becuz the defendant brought the boat as well, which makes him a victim too. Why sue somebody dat actually brought and had ownership of the boat as well? You sue the seller's, not the buyers smh
Plaintiff didn't prove that defendant was at fault. I think the case would have been dismissed if the defendant hasn't said she would pay. And the plaintiff is petty as fck, she made herself look like a fool in public.
This was a scam. The young boy's job was to retrieve the boat after it was sold. The they just didn't anticipate that the new owner was smarter than them! The seller was clearly a scammer. Outrageous!
The defendant in the second case was both arrogant and immature. Catch him pointing & laughing after the verdict, what adult does that? I also do not understand why people go to JFs court, suing for $19,000 in the second case, when her court can only assess to $5000. Perhaps to use that judgement in different court?
If she had accidentally wreck a friends car, would she have to pay?? “I’m a little disturbed by the judges decision on the cellphone issue” The defendant also mentioned she was drinking. Isn’t that proving her negligence?
If I was the judge that last man who's in possession of the boat would be silenced, sent out or handcuffed, extremely bad mannered. It is incredibly how the audience is applauding him.
technically yeah BUT the plaintiff does have a right to go after her still for other stuff not just this and the defendant has 0 credibility when she lied in court.
Wow, anytime someone ask me to take a photo I get nervous and wonder if I drop it what would happen. I'm never taking a photo of anyone with their phone u less they have an otter box case. 😅
The first case is so ridiculous. The plaintiff asked the defendant to do her a favor. Then got mad when an accident happened. The defendant said things she didn’t mean and should’ve have said regarding when she wasn’t goxing to give her the money. Then the plaintiff drove 2 hours to have a $70 dinner at her job and drove 2 hours back. Then she told the defendant was done speaking to her. Then she had the defendant served with a lawsuit at work. If someone dropped my phone if they were doing me a favor I would be upset but I wouldn’t expect them to pay for it. I asked for the favor. They didn’t just pick up my phone and do whatever they wanted with it without my permission.
In the first case there was proof that the defendant agreed to pay for the phone she broke but didn’t provide evidence of negligence? What would have been the outcome of the friend accidentally crashing a car ? She would have been liable especially if she had agreed to pay. Love Judge Faith but didn’t agree with her judgement and in recent seasons of the show feel that some of the judgements have been emotionally based rather than solely legal, factual and street sensible.
So is it like if you hit someone with your car, since it was an "accident" you don't have to pay?! I mean, regardless if the item was small or expensive, destroying something whether it is accidental or not should have someone being liable for it.
Shelia Pea Sure you can, but it wasn't necessary and could have lost that girl her job. A jobless college student who can't pay rent and tuition won't be giving up any money. She is ridiculous.
So long as you have an address for the person you’re serving, you can serve them papers anywhere. Doesn’t mean you can’t be fired for it for unprofessional conduct.
It's the principle of the thing. If you told your friend that you're going to repair something or pay to repair it or get them a new one then that's a verbal contract as a friend. If she really considered that girl her friend then she would've just gave her the money.
He is just freaking odd in general.... face twitching, rapid eye blinking/movements. Random outbursts of dumb things....seems like he's coked up almost
"That picture was like four days before he took the boat." how do you know the exact date he took the boat, and if you were on vacation who took the picture?
It’s pretty simple. On the first day, the original buyer had taken a picture of the boat. The next day (or any other time within the 4 day course) the original buyer went on vacation. When he comes back, he finds out that the boat was stolen and finds it. The thief could have told him when he bought/took it or legal documentation of when he bought/took it which tells you when he bought/took the boat. That answers all your questions.
What is not going to be done is stoop to your level of ignorance Jamilla. You're entitled to your opinion and if you want to be racist more power to your ignorance. We with intelligence won't resort to that =) have several seats.
disagree with the first verdict. this judge will award damages when a person crashes another person’s car even though it was an accident but with text messages with a promise to pay and admission that it was an accident rules against the plaintiff? not cool.
well by the logic of the judge in the first case, ima just go around dropping people’s phones and I shouldn’t have to pay because it was an “accident”. even if I agreed to pay for the item I dropped, I shouldn’t have to pay. if I drive my car into someone else’s I shouldn’t have to pay because it was an “accident” 😂😂 like what
It was the way it happened tho. It seemed that they were drunk, they both had the phone in their hands when it dropped. It was sort of both of their faults that it broke.
Khyla Cymone oh no she should have paid since she said she was gonna pay for it. But I'm not gonna pay for a phone breaking the way it happened for them. The defendant should've never agreed to pay tbh.
Khyla Cymone now let's take out the agreeing to it. So if you and a friend we're in the process of exchanging the phone and it dropped during the exchange even though neither of y'all had a grasp on the phone, the friend still gotta pay the full price of the phone. Girl what? 😭
I don't think it matters. I mean if I go buy 75 dollar sneakers and someone owed me 200 dollars for a deposit or whatever, it's still owed to me whether I can afford other things or not. It's my money, not theirs. This is a different case though, but I'm just saying because I'm in the middle of an unreturned deposit because the lady "does not have the money yet".
The first video the lady should have gave the woman the money back for the cell phone. But once she started dodging her you know I don't blame the lady for going up to her job at the same time she need to cause a scene at her work
Yes you're right but then the plantif should be accountable as well for being intoxicated. Therefore going to a concert to drink and then handing a phone over without full capacity and control of yourself, means you can't blame the other for negligence. Too bad too sad. stop being a petty pad.
Barbara was too stiff and impersonal compared to the easy-going nature of J. Faith and never stopped the litigants from arguing. Even let a defendant approach the bench alone. Super No-No for a Baliff.
This is ridiculous damn shame, the defendant walking in thou 🙌🙌🙌 very pretty you definitely don’t need a friend like the plaintiff , i hope you learn ....
Watching all these judge faith cases got me feeling like I’m a top notch lawyer or something 😂😂
That's how I be feeling too. I'm ready to give somebody legal advice. Lol!!!
I watched Judge Faith for so long that I understand a bit better of the law. Now people are gonna be shocked when they find out I know the law a bit while trying to swindle me 😏
Exactly
I'm Opening up a law office.. Who's with me??
😂😂
Emotional distress over a cellphone 🙄
Chandy Pierre lol
right!!! 😅😅😅
Cell phones are very important I'm this generation so not having it can be very hard on some people
@@mariama7126 Really important?! Instagram and SnapChat is giving someone such as yourself false hope & pretenses😀
@@TotaloneBadBoy-uo5gu my phone us very important nd not just for social media
No one is talking about the guy that is suing 20,000 dollars for when he only supposedly paid 2,000 😂😂😂😂
Kat Howard okay I thought I heard wrong! Glad you heard that too 😂
Right lol defendant looked like a coke addict. Little twitchy and kept sniffling. Seen way too many of those in court not to be able to see it right away.
Some of them sue for a larger amount just in case they get lucky. He took it too far tho 😂
Hiiiii
1st case- $70 meal and $50 court fee- all to get $150 for a phone. Oh boy
Stoycoff Studios Photography add $30 you have the $150 to get the phone replaced LMMFAO
Lol what is wrong y'all females over there in America 🤣🤣🤣
Well she said it was split with a friend so 35 meal
Plus the gas driving a total of 4 hours 😂
@@lillygirl8436 Men do this too.
The audience really don’t know when to clap or what to clap for 😑
Riiiiiiiight lol. So off putting.
They don't know how to respond to to this f'ery 🙃
CupCake SO CRINGE
They are very annoying
They do it in every episode😹👎🏼
The woman in the first case is beyond ridiculous. It was an accident grow up
Regardless of an "Accident" bottom line she offered to pay for it pay up!! 🙄
I agree Kameelah..... I just don't understand why she even agreed to pay her...
Let me take your phone and break it see how happy you would be
She don""t have no shame , That is the way she makes money very sneaky.
I would tell the lady who dropped it to pay it and then tell the lady suing to grow up.
I wouldn't give her a dime if I dropped that phone. We both were drunk and she handed me her phone to take a picture...really?🙄...Girl have several seats...it was an accident...
Thembeka Zimkhona exactly
Thembeka Zimkhona i know 15 & 16 year olds that its happened to & theyre just like “oh its okay it was an accident “ like wtf
This is why you protect your phone . My ex friend had her phone on the table and another girl at the table spilled MY drink on her phone . My ex friend calls me the next day about it . I was like I knew this ish was going to happen but I have nothing to do with that I did not spill the drink even tho it was mine , goodbye .
Man my friends are so nice compared to these people, I broke my friends phone and she was like oh well and said I didn't have to pay for anything...
Lol we dont do that where i live. Who ever spills the drink its there fault no matter whos drink it was. But lol we don't expect our friends to replace fones like that no matter whos fault it is , we just get another one ourselves.
Exactly
Why am I up at 3am on Christmas binge watching Judge Faith 😂
girl, sameeeee
because you were moved by holy FAITH😂
@@manishagarwal9019 good one
@@manishagarwal9019 hey she makes me go old faithful without touching
Same
Judge faith is the most personal TV judge I have ever seen. I feel like I’m in a real courtroom when I watch her.
He said he was walking 🚶 in park when the a guy said I have boat 🚣 to sell
.....and now it’s his friend.
Your emoji game is on point
Exactly she don’t be peepin stuff lol Judy or Milian would’ve been like ummm no ur scamming
Can't even wrap my head around this. Your friend mistakenly dropped your 📱 and you ask her to pay for it? And drove two hours to her place of work to collect 150$ and ended up sharing a 70$ dollar meal with her, while waiting for 150$? this is beyond stupid!!
right After all of that, she spent well over 150. I guess it was the principle for her.
First Case - this woman drove two hours and spent $70 on a dinner, but is whining about a phone being paid? She obviously got money. She is being extremely petty and to send the court documents to her job was even worse.
At least the Def was happy.
Marcus A That's happened to almost everybody. You hand something over and you both lose grip on it. It's noone's fault. She's no friend, she a money grubber Beeatch.
+Joseph T. She owed her money to fix her phone you stupid scam artist Bitch.
Marcus A she probably works for her money too so I guess she can be petty all she wants if she paid for it with her money. (however she's a friend so dropping a phone between real friends shouldn't. really matter, but you know some people)
but the court documents thing that's petty if they were friends I'm sure she knows where she was living
Marcus A
spent $70 on a dinner, 10 - 20 on gas, and 50 bucks to file the case.
find something else to do lol
Judge Faith is so 😍😍😍😍😍
Hey kids! Let's play fill in the blanks.
indeed 💯 ain't she sexy ?
Queenz Lady for real
That smile 😍😍😍
2:34 😍😍😍
Case 1: Judge Judy would have said, "You stated in a text that you would pay her, therefore, I'm ordering you to pay her." Even if the plaintiff was wacky.
Jason Gates The contention of the plaintiff was that the defendant broke her phone and therefore owed her the money. Since the loss was accidental, under the law she cannot compel the defendant to pay, and the defendants under no obligation to pay despite what she promised. The rulings in these cases are based on law, not our feelings about what is "fair". The defendant needs to get accident insurance on her next phone.
The plaintiff needs to get accident insurance on her next phone.
I disagree with you even tho was accident and plaintiff couldn't prove 100% that the defendant fault and as in the message she promised her to pay so the defendant need to pay at least half the price.
so the judge could have ruled either way. On one hand yes she could have agreed to pay for a portion of the price of the phone. %00 or what ever would have been too much especially since it was a phone that was used so it would have depreciated in value anyways.
The question is is the defendant responsible. If it was how they described and it slipped and especially if they were both moderately intoxicated it actually can void any responsibility. Reasonable care was made because it wasn't like she was saying .. hey hold on to my phone for the day and she lost it.
Bottom line the girl who is the plaintiff spent way to much money trying to recover something that wasn't even worth the money that she spent. She should have cut her losses or got her friend to pay her by the sunday.. and chilled..should have not shown up at the job and probably cut the loss in the first place or... get a good case.
She only talked about paying $150 in the text messages. She said 50 now, 100 later. The plaintiff raise the price to 600. Uh no, the phone isn’t worth that much and she didn’t agree to that. The defendant should have to pay the 150 but should win her harassment argument
I do think coming to someone's job and getting them wrote up should be considered defamation... she's messing with her livelihood at that point
Right ✅
Defamation is when you say something or write something that isn't true. Going to someone's job is not defamation. lol
This girl is Extra suing a girl for dropping her phone and travelling two hours to stress her out spending $70 plus fuel ⛽️ then filed a £50 lawsuit ... what bullshit?!
That boat scammer is hilarious without meaning to be.
On the last case I truly believe the plaintiff was scamming the defended and he did steal the boat and hid it from him. the plaintiff is a thief
Andrew King I did a little bit of sanding on the boat, ( which just happened to be the name )!! Ha, ha,!!
I think this is a scam gone wrong XD. Holarious
She came popping up in there like a strawberry pop tart
Yes
Exactly lmaooo
😂😂😂
🤣🤣pop tart ... funny
I'd eat that Pop-Tart. 😉
Second Case- Erik's Body language and face twitching says he's a liar. Lol
He should’ve gotten some money back for damages to the boat because he admitted that he sanded the name off
She has a really nice clear speaking voice the judge lol
Backward speak I also do.
Even if sis was being petty, the girl said she was going to pay for it. 🤷🏾♀️
yeah but your missing one thing here,,,,, when u sent court documents to someone job they might lose there job all because she wanted her money come on now she knew where she lived she could have sent them there instead of her job. sending court documents to someone job is way more then petty its stuptidy.
She almost had that girl lose her job. Then she was definitely not getting any money, just dumb
Hiiii
She is petty
All this for a cell phone? Good lord. That's why immediately after I buy a new phone, I get a hardcover phone case.
Judge Faith is beautiful.
I live for her SHOW!!! So addictive😊
Defendant in the second case was so immature
In the first case, both the plaintiff and defendant were so beautiful! I like Veronica's style.
I love the defendant in de 2nd case... when you tell the truth you have nothing to worry about... and I do believe the plaintiff stole his items out of the boat, I mean if he could manage to steal the boat itself!!!
when the boat is that low in price there has to be something strange there
She agreed to pay $100. From what I hear. She should have paid that. However for $600? And then send the documents to the defendants work? Drove 2 hours to her work paid $70 for dinner, and then worried about her following her on twitter? She handled the whole situation unprofessionally. She wasn't negligent. It was an accident!!
A “guy” you mean your friend, “walked up to you at the park while walking your dog” what a scammer
First case, not sure about the ruling becuz even tho it was an accident it still was gonna cost to get fixed or replaced. Reallly no different from having a car accident and even tho it was an accident, dat person is at fault and they have to pay or their insurance. Not even halfway into the second case I knew dat the plaintiff wasn't gonna win becuz the defendant brought the boat as well, which makes him a victim too. Why sue somebody dat actually brought and had ownership of the boat as well? You sue the seller's, not the buyers smh
MsCeCe in the case of an “accident” someone is usually at fault for negligence. Not the same thing as dropping a cell phone you hand to someone.
Plaintiff didn't prove that defendant was at fault. I think the case would have been dismissed if the defendant hasn't said she would pay. And the plaintiff is petty as fck, she made herself look like a fool in public.
MsCeCe good point
She was drunk she should've expected it, you don't hand your phone over to someone whose drunk because chances are they'll drop the phone..
If dinner was 70, and the lawsuit cost 50, then she could have paid for a new phone herself.
It was an accident but she agreed to pay something. This is the second case I dont agree with the judge smh
This was a scam. The young boy's job was to retrieve the boat after it was sold. The they just didn't anticipate that the new owner was smarter than them! The seller was clearly a scammer. Outrageous!
The second defendant was really rude during the case. A tad disappointed in the Judge for not calling him out.
The defendant in the second case was both arrogant and immature. Catch him pointing & laughing after the verdict, what adult does that?
I also do not understand why people go to JFs court, suing for $19,000 in the second case, when her court can only assess to $5000.
Perhaps to use that judgement in different court?
"And I say?" "I do?" 😝💩😆The plaintiff should have used the money for English Grammar classes!
Life happens and not everything in life is a lawsuit. The first plaintiff is handling this situation like a child, they both need to grow up.
defendant in case 2: welcome to lala land
Me:*waits for laughs*
Audience: LINE?
Me: u a disapoint
If she had accidentally wreck a friends car, would she have to pay??
“I’m a little disturbed by the judges decision on the cellphone issue”
The defendant also mentioned she was drinking. Isn’t that proving her negligence?
First case she is extremely petty and ridiculous it was clearly an accident. I would have called the police had she stalked me like that
That girl drove 2 hours and paid $70 in food all for a broken cell phone?! And she still didn't seem to realize how crazy she seems.
If I was the judge that last man who's in possession of the boat would be silenced, sent out or handcuffed, extremely bad mannered. It is incredibly how the audience is applauding him.
The first defendant looked so fulfilled and happy after the judgement😅😅
Dont like the defendant in the second case. Even though the verdict ruled in his favour, I find him way too arrogant.
The thumbnail made that girl look crazy
This judge is not only smart but cute
Taqeem Hilton first the weave comment then this. That’s just sad
lol
Sexy as hell, the best looking judge I seen and I seen a lot of judges ..lol
@@macidismuke4326 what's sad about the comment?
Beautiful judge takes no nonsense
she still agreed to pay so she should have that's an agreement
No. legally you can say I will, but then change your mind.
technically yeah
BUT
the plaintiff does have a right to go after her still for other stuff not just this
and the defendant has 0 credibility when she lied in court.
Miki Johnson umm no she does have to and clearly the judge saw it that way. by the way that white girl is pretty
Miki Johnson she should atleast help pay for the phone. Do half of the 150
Um no anyone can promise to pay someone but unless you’re liable, it can not be enforced.
She basically spent over $150 just stalking the girl to drive 2 hours to her job and have dinner. What a duck!!
Wow, anytime someone ask me to take a photo I get nervous and wonder if I drop it what would happen. I'm never taking a photo of anyone with their phone u less they have an otter box case. 😅
Judge Faith is the best Judge in the world by far 👌👌👌👌👌
The first case is so ridiculous. The plaintiff asked the defendant to do her a favor. Then got mad when an accident happened. The defendant said things she didn’t mean and should’ve have said regarding when she wasn’t goxing to give her the money. Then the plaintiff drove 2 hours to have a $70 dinner at her job and drove 2 hours back. Then she told the defendant was done speaking to her. Then she had the defendant served with a lawsuit at work. If someone dropped my phone if they were doing me a favor I would be upset but I wouldn’t expect them to pay for it. I asked for the favor. They didn’t just pick up my phone and do whatever they wanted with it without my permission.
In the first case there was proof that the defendant agreed to pay for the phone she broke but didn’t provide evidence of negligence? What would have been the outcome of the friend accidentally crashing a car ? She would have been liable especially if she had agreed to pay. Love Judge Faith but didn’t agree with her judgement and in recent seasons of the show feel that some of the judgements have been emotionally based rather than solely legal, factual and street sensible.
Judge faith is a beautiful lady
Don't tell her that during your case tho 😂
The black guy behind the plaintiff in the first case is falling asleep 😂😂😂😂
Second case, defendant was not playing...Lmao
The girl should pay for the phone she broke. Doesn't matter if on purpose or accident.
That first case was nonsense.
HER WEAVE!!!!!!😫🤣😂🤣😂
Horrible 😂😂😂
It is toooooo much ... 😂😂
Barbara looked happy this episode. Probably got slicked down that morning 🤣
Both case so ridiculous . One cause the accident, other both victims of scammer.
I like how the gentleman describes the cases. He has a sense of humour.
So is it like if you hit someone with your car, since it was an "accident" you don't have to pay?! I mean, regardless if the item was small or expensive, destroying something whether it is accidental or not should have someone being liable for it.
DollsAndSpooks facts
That's like saying DUI was accident. You're still going get charge under influence.
This is EXACTLY what I thought!!!!!!! Thank you
Am I the only one who doesn't like Barbara?
Nah she bring the energy down for some reason. She's sweet, but I like Juan better.
😴
I almost dropped my phone watching this
second case: seems like they have a problem with the original owner or some body is lying
ladies that is why you put a good case on a phone
Judge Faith is DREAMY 😍😍😍
I definitely believe in the first case that because the girl said she would pay for the cell phone that she should've paid for it.
The judge said though she needs to prove that it was more than an accident before she's actually liable to pay
The black girl is so beautiful!
I think she's even more beautiful without this overdone wig.
You can be served on a job.
Shelia Pea Yup
Shelia Pea Sure you can, but it wasn't necessary and could have lost that girl her job. A jobless college student who can't pay rent and tuition won't be giving up any money. She is ridiculous.
So long as you have an address for the person you’re serving, you can serve them papers anywhere. Doesn’t mean you can’t be fired for it for unprofessional conduct.
19:12 lol that Nelson laugh
extremely petty if she can afford the gas nd the dinner she cud definitely afford to fix the phone evidently she doesn't value friendship smh
It's the principle of the thing. If you told your friend that you're going to repair something or pay to repair it or get them a new one then that's a verbal contract as a friend. If she really considered that girl her friend then she would've just gave her the money.
Who cares if it’s an accident. She still need to pay for it.
Exactly! Car accidents are accidents but you still have to pay
Why is the defendant talking with his eyebrows... Every other word his eyebrows move up and down🙄
He is just freaking odd in general.... face twitching, rapid eye blinking/movements. Random outbursts of dumb things....seems like he's coked up almost
"That picture was like four days before he took the boat."
how do you know the exact date he took the boat, and if you were on vacation who took the picture?
It’s pretty simple. On the first day, the original buyer had taken a picture of the boat. The next day (or any other time within the 4 day course) the original buyer went on vacation. When he comes back, he finds out that the boat was stolen and finds it. The thief could have told him when he bought/took it or legal documentation of when he bought/took it which tells you when he bought/took the boat. That answers all your questions.
She drove two hours to eat dinner and than back another two hours and still sue for phone bills wow!
...that man with(out) the boat looks like Terry Hall
Judge faith is awesome !
The first plaintiff is SOO petty, it's pathetic!
Taqeem Hilton he said petty not pretty.
Jamilla Harris What was the point of this racist comment? What does looks have to do with anything? He was calling her petty...
@@CharliEdwards what u going to do about it bitch
lmao i misread something the other day don't feel bad
What is not going to be done is stoop to your level of ignorance Jamilla. You're entitled to your opinion and if you want to be racist more power to your ignorance. We with intelligence won't resort to that =) have several seats.
I was pretty unique that the court audience was allowed to sit down while Judge Faith presides for the 1st season
Ha ha , pain and suffering .... fore a phone !!!
disagree with the first verdict. this judge will award damages when a person crashes another person’s car even though it was an accident but with text messages with a promise to pay and admission that it was an accident rules against the plaintiff? not cool.
Same narrator as How its made???
Yup!! I noticed that too
Ok Im not the only one. 😊
Duty, breach, causation, and damages. Each element must be proven. If not, no prima facia case.
I wouldn’t ask her for money for dropping my phone that I asked her to use to take my funky picture
In the second case the defendant was a jerk 😂
somebody said it. He was such an ass. Reminds me of some customers I have dealt with
well by the logic of the judge in the first case, ima just go around dropping people’s phones and I shouldn’t have to pay because it was an “accident”. even if I agreed to pay for the item I dropped, I shouldn’t have to pay. if I drive my car into someone else’s I shouldn’t have to pay because it was an “accident” 😂😂 like what
It was the way it happened tho. It seemed that they were drunk, they both had the phone in their hands when it dropped. It was sort of both of their faults that it broke.
Khyla Cymone oh no she should have paid since she said she was gonna pay for it. But I'm not gonna pay for a phone breaking the way it happened for them. The defendant should've never agreed to pay tbh.
Khyla Cymone now let's take out the agreeing to it. So if you and a friend we're in the process of exchanging the phone and it dropped during the exchange even though neither of y'all had a grasp on the phone, the friend still gotta pay the full price of the phone. Girl what? 😭
@@timothiturner5218 Then they should split the cost.
I don't think it matters. I mean if I go buy 75 dollar sneakers and someone owed me 200 dollars for a deposit or whatever, it's still owed to me whether I can afford other things or not. It's my money, not theirs. This is a different case though, but I'm just saying because I'm in the middle of an unreturned deposit because the lady "does not have the money yet".
The first video the lady should have gave the woman the money back for the cell phone. But once she started dodging her you know I don't blame the lady for going up to her job at the same time she need to cause a scene at her work
K v you are so right, but people don't be accountable for their action. She should of got something.
Yes you're right but then the plantif should be accountable as well for being intoxicated. Therefore going to a concert to drink and then handing a phone over without full capacity and control of yourself, means you can't blame the other for negligence. Too bad too sad. stop being a petty pad.
In my opinion, I like when Juan is on the show because he knows to just get the papers and put everyone in line, not Barbra.
The plantiff in the first case full of 🤬
And full of wig ... 😄
What happened to bailiff Juan??
Levi Pinkhasov this is season 1, he’s in season 2
Juan was the bailiff for the last 2 seasons of the show.
Barbara was too stiff and impersonal compared to the easy-going nature of J. Faith and never stopped the litigants from arguing. Even let a defendant approach the bench alone. Super No-No for a Baliff.
Everybody is suing for defamation of character and emotional stress 🤣🤣🤣🤣
This is ridiculous damn shame, the defendant walking in thou 🙌🙌🙌 very pretty you definitely don’t need a friend like the plaintiff , i hope you learn ....
she does not owe that girl anything, she asked her to take the picture tf
1st case. Defendant walks in so arrogantly. She should have paid what she said she would.